Newspaper Page Text
THE J3AILY ..SUN.
TvtBDAi Moanna Aoouira 15.
Office •'» Uu Sun Building, We*/
tide ef Broad ttreet, Second Door South of
Alabama.
tgf New Advertisements always found
n First P"”' • loanl and Business Kottct
on Fint Poof, Lotto! and Business
on Fourth Page.
We clip 0- following gloriow Mr
nonnoement bom tke WMhington Clfty
rabid, and commend is wA only to the
11 that i
r to pfod&0o
>v4 of Mr. Secretary
‘bill, in any way, bo Nmftny on (bn oft- ,** sort of Bate" -(MlM te «t. under
oo'^ual detriments of'the Gown- ft *
meat, or preclude tlioso from the proper
exeroiao of their official functions upon
the same subject matter; anil further,
that neither House of Congress, nor both
together, having any euch power them
selves, they can not confer it npon any
other person or body whatever.
If Congress! tbero/oro, did by this act
of 1818, intend to confer this power upon
the atcrelury of 8Ut«, and in this way
aid attempt to "gpndnsle" all imp dries by
the Opurts into matters touching the
himself, as wall ns
Editor eMMJowrnd hta**elf,«« we
nil olka- “New Departure" ndvoentsn
OLD KENTUCKY'S SOAR
“X33KS? rn.ru.
HIS JIAtftam WMi BEACH 60,«0.
■..arm'll VOTE) XI* OOMX < IPOM TBB **"
anAvr DFrncnnsi or vnrt mm **■
■limn, run.
[Sp.sU DUpaMi to tko retook)
rnmuwiram. lv>. Anitutll, remwa
JSSrtto. *— UUrt,-slm.,oomH
T?'** XIiTZL n roootvUw oat^alj **
sedtdity of amendments to the Constitu
tiop, and to estop all Judicial Investiga
tion ns to the fad* touching the "mode
nod manner" of their proposal and adop
tion. then (ho act is limply null and void.
Slid Will be so treated by every Court
•btoh^dasstand* its powers and duties,
and has the integrity faithfully to cxer-
eias and disohaige them.
Our view of this act of i818 is this—
It was intended only to meko it the dnty
of the Sasoataryod Bute to give publle
,-p f - tf the official proceedings of tho
several States upon the Constitutional
Mtendments ss they appeared of hie in
office. This was highly proper; and
when from the returns so filed, it ap
peared that three-fourths of tho States had
dnly ratified an amendment, it was to bo
published by him, leaving, of course, all
questions touching its validity, jost as all
questions touchiug tho constitutionality
'cZrts tko. * ursto'lVr
"SlSnSS rj»«W about oaotol/lto "oasM..
nLMMSQSi
oitr aailor Isslg.r,
Is he who conducts the Vsihington Pat-
not pls«MA»itb"aiit> Knurosrt Boar,"
that heralded through his oolnmnsf If so
doss he not pensive that it is the “old
Kwrooti aoaa" ell708 f It is a “uoaa”
against v<uru«r>, and «U their A to* orinaes
aa wolles *wl one*. It la noeiwckyroutl
against the Ku-Klux, and Enforcement
notn nT farcical as the gentle moan of
him in the play—who notifies his audi
ence, not to be alarm**, for though ho acts
the
snug,
iflrtc
.a lion, yetheia only “one
_Mner!"
In these utterances from Kentucky,
does not onr eotompctaiy itcoguUc the
“roar" of anr* enough lion—*u enraged
people thorongbly aroused to a sense of
their (Wongs, in hot pursuit of the viola
tors of tbeir rights, and determined
neither to approW'61' sanction nsurpa
tion, but at the poilt, "in the numner and
by the motlv Constitutionally appointtd," to
rid themselves,, not only of those who
of acts of Congress published in the
In this “hoas,” does ho not catch the
Ivy note of the canvass of 1873, if Dem
ocratio success on Democratic principles
is »lint he wants?
Does he not see thut the old Demo
cratic Banner of 1788, now Hosts most
triumphantly in Kontnchy, where "it Into
been hot'jui highest nntl boldest in tkf* caste
fin ‘ t " A. H. 8.
“ Is It a Judicial Question 1”
Minn way, and certified to under -tbe
‘great Beal,” are loftj^lor judicial
iuraetigatioij and determination,
By the act the Secretary ia to certify
to t^io apparent validity of tho amend
ment from the official Document* and
retains in his office ; stating particularly
the {Mss which have ratified it—just aa
tbe Governors of States oertify, and also,
sometime**, attach the “great Beal” ol
their rospeotivo States to the returns of
the election of members of Congress,
Seu&tora and Representative*, a« appear
from official document* iu their reapoo*
offices. AU buJi atriifi&Ue* carry with
them nothing but jtrimu facie evidence
o! the truth of the fade to which they re-
They do not pnoiude, nor aro they
intended to preclude an overhauling of the
Records in a case made before, and by a
proper tribunal,
Thoso views of ours as to the iutoution
of tho act of 1818 are confirmed by
looking to the antecedent action of
the Government npon the subject of
Constitutional Amendments.
The first ten Amendment* were adopt
ed soon after tho Government went into
operation under tho Constitution of 1787.
The fad of the ratification of these, by
the several States acting upon them, was
communicated by General Washington,
the President, in messages to Congress,
aocompsnied by the official Documents
In the issue of Tun Suit to-day will bo
found an article under the above heading,
L •*
k *
k o
k
from the Augusta (Go.) CoiuHtudmudist
of the Uth inataut
Oar ootomporary seems not to nnder-
staud what we denied, and what wa join
ed issue with him npon, in oar notice of
his first article upon tbe inbjeot of the Ju
dicial power over question* oonuoeted with
Oonstitntlonal amendments. This misap
prehension on hit part oleerlyappean tom
his seoond srtiolu referred to, end which,
ea stated, we give our reader* lu full to
day. We did not deny that the Secreta
ry of State had any authority to issue
a proclamation upon the aubjeot of Con
stitutional Amendments; hut wodid deny
his rightful authority to determine by
proclamation, even with the great seal of
State attached to it, what is and what is
not part of the Constitution; and this
denial tru repeat, notwithstanding the sot
of Congress of 1818, arrayed against us
with so maeb-eoeniiag confidence by our
ootemporary. That set of Congress we
were well aware of when we penned what
we did On thispoiat, and hence weoon-
fined onr language to the denial of any
ripifWfinthoiity (underscoring the word)
on his part, ia this way, to
judgments the eaUdUy of amendments
to the Constitu tion, or by his attachment
of the great seal of State to auoh procla
mations, to •'preclude’' the Courts from
going behind this great seal so attached,
and inquiring irito the real facte of the
once. We utterly deny the rightful pow
er of Congmaa to confer any such “ ow
thority" apw the Secretary of State, or
upon any offioer eadsw the ttovernnaect
nor do we believe that My inch intention
existed at the Ume of the paamge of the
aet of 1818. Bat whether It did or not,
nothing is dearer than that under the
Constitution of the United States, Con
gress had no power to pern an act with
such intention or with snob effect
Be the question between tu end oar
ootempowy, on this point, ia not one to
be settled by the adduction of the sot of
1818. If qffitotd with this view, we aamil
it upon the same grounds weamail the
whole dooMaee of ooreotemporary upon
this entire anhiect.
We need not, we trust, elaborate troths
aa indisputable as these: that Congress
can rightfully exercise no power which ia
not dearly delegated by the States in the
oompaot of their union; and that no
power is therein delegated to them, either
direetlyor indimoUy, to pern final *n4 ...
absolute Jnfigmeht upon the validity <rf]hia
whet pnrpmtsteheM amen dm mtttothe
Oonetttaltoo, except in eaaaafiUieg with,
in the separate and exoludve jarisdickoa
of their Homes reepeetivdy; in othm
States had duly ratified these ten amend
ments, uad no one controverted the fact,
they were all by general consent accepted
and aetod upon as valid parte of the Or
ganic Law—there was no proclamation or
public announcement of tho foot what
ever. In all subsequent editions of the
Constitution they were published ns parte
of the same; end so regarded by the
ntbur Departments of onr Oovorment, as
well as the people elsewhere; because
there was no moro question as to the va
lidity of their proposal and ratification
than thoro was as to tho Constitution
itself.
Tho eleventh amendment, thut which
prohibits the bringing of Bults against a
State by citizens of other States of tho
Union or of Foreign States, Whs pro
posed in 1704.
Quito a number of States, it was
kuowu, had ratified it between its propo
sal and the closo of the year 1797; but
w hich ones mid what lmmla-r was nof
exactly known in tho country generally.
Congress, therefore, by Resolution, called
upon tho President for the official infer
motion in his office of the proceedings of
tho States which had passed upon it. In
reply to this Resolution Mr. Adams, who
was till'll President, stated in a message
dated the 80th of December, 1797, that
from official documents in the office of
the Hcefctary of State it appeared that
this Amendment had been duly ratified
by three-fourths of the States.
No Other pirvdamatiim was nude about
it. No ouo In Congress questioned its
validity on any grounds whatever, and it,
too, Was afterwards publishns part of
theOoMtitution in nil subsequent editions
of that instrument,
Tho twetflh amendment—that which
ohanged the mode of electing the Presi
dent and Vice President of the United
Slates—was proposed in 1803, and adopt
ed by threo-foarths of the States as early
ss the month of September, 1804,
Mr. Jeffereoowaaat this time President;
and when official information was receiv
ed in his offioe of tho notion of the requi
site number of States ratifying it, he
~ tho lllen Socrotary of State to
give public notice of the tamo in tho news-
This was important information
for the people'of all the States to have at
that time, aa the choioo of electors for
President Md.Vloa President tar another
term was to oome off that fall. This
public newsjtopcr notice of the ratification
of fill amendment was given by the Sec
retary of State on the 25Ut September,
1804.
No one questioned tbe validity of tho
amendment in any way. This is a suc
cinct review of those matters np to 1818.
M .that time other amendments had
bcM proposed; and the object of the act
of 1818 seems dearly to have been sim
ply, by tarn, to direct tho Secretary, of
State to give public notice of the foot, when
appear from official returns in
that any new amendment
had been ratified by the requests num
ber el States, just as Mr. Jeftnon had
directed him to do in 1804 of his own
aooord, and mdhosd <my lose. This is the
whola of it One thing is oectain, and
■fii* rnhdity ol the 14th and loth amend
mente, so-called, nor preclude judioia! in
vestigatious concerning them, any more
than the public newspaper notice of Mr.
decretory Madison, given upon tho bare
instructions ol Mr. Jefferson, 00*11 h&vo
estopped or prcuudml Uke inquiry or inves
tigation concerning the validity of the
J2th amendment.
Now, the question between us and our
ootomporary of Augusta, On., is whether
tho courts of tbe countr/ out ever, in any
investigation, go behind this public no
tice or certificate of a Secretary of State,
setting forth baroly what appears from
returns iu his office.
Our cotemporary says: “We maintain
that the Supreme Court is precluded
from going behind the certificate, and
discussing whether the amendment so
certified is valid. It is bound to accept
tho same as valid.
This is the clear and distinct position
of our ootomporary. Ours, on tho con
trary, is equally clear and distinct, tliat
neither the Supreme Court of the United
States, nor any other Court in the land,
either State or Federal, high or low,
is thus precluded from going behind any
such certificate and inquiring whether
the amendment so certified to is in truth
and fait valid or not. All courts in this
country aro judgos of what is and what
is not constitutional in Legislation. Tho
Judioiol Department of onr Governments,
both State and Federal, was instituted
for the purpose of “opening the door,”
and opening it wide, too, for just such
inquiries and investigations, however
"interminable they may be."
All courts were instituted to make in
vestigations into frauds and wrongs of
all Boris properly ooming before them, ee
"interminably" as thejunjust perpetra
tors of them shall render it necessary.
It seems a little strango to us that our
ootomporary, aftor his broad and unquali
fied ilonial of our position, should hnve,
in the very next sentence, admitted
enough to upsot tho entiro fabric of h>s
declamatory assertions; for argument it
cannot be called. The admission wc re
fer to is in these wand* : “Wo have met
“ with but one case reported where tho Su
preme Court entertained a question of
“ fact as to whother on amendment to the
“Constitution was constitutionally rati-
“fled.” ,
WoU, if • tho Supreme Court of the
United States lies in one case entertained
a question of fact, os to whether on
amendment to tho Constitution was prop
erly ratified or not, why may they not in
another ? How can it be affirmatively
and broadly answered iu advance of tho
question being presented to thorn,
that they will not in another ? How can
it be so unqualifiedly ussertod that they
are "precluded” from entertaining the
...rt-T-t- "... fir.lanuv.i-AH' ’ ""Tu t.nat
“ case the point was not made denying
“the right of tlio Court to go iuto the
“ inquiry."
Now, we suppose that the cose here re
ferred to is tlio case of Hollingsworth cl
ah vs. Virginia, 3, Dallas 378.
In Hint ease, at any rate, a question
touching tho vatulity ol the eleventh
Amendment did come up or was raised —
the jioint made was that the Joint Reso
lution of tlio two Houses of Congress
proposing this Amendment to the States,
had not been presented to tho President
and had not received his approval; nnd
therefore the Amendment itself was void.
Tho Court overruled the point. They
held, and rightly held, after urginnent
upou it, that the approval of the I'nwi-
dent was net necessary to a Resolution of
tills character, and that tho Anii'iidnnn)t
was not mtalid on the grounds alleged.
If the counsel on the other side did not
object to tho Coart's taking jurimliotion
of the qtW.Htie«, it Was, perhaps, beeanao
they thought as we do, that atteli a [Hisi-
tion would ho utterly untenable.
llut tire greet foot which wo wish now
to call IBjrini attention to is that tlio
Supreme Ckmit of the United Statee has
taken jurisdiction of the .pteslion and pro-
nouiicetl jwhpnrn' npm it in at bast oh*
lakes issue. It goes iartlier, and de
nies the authofity of tho Secretary of
State t, i-.-ov' n proclamation on the
ini bicot.
This ia the language of Tin Si'S f
“To this we have barely to say at this
time, that tho Supreme Court is not pre
cluded from going behind tho great seal
of State attached to any proclamation of
Mr. Secretary Seward concerning matters
over which he was clothed with no proper
power or authority to issue a proclama
tion. The great seal ol State, iarespected
l»y tho Supremo Court, or any other
-ourt, only when attached by tho proper
officer to such papers and documents us
lie has duo authority to sttacli it to. Of
the nature of the paper, as well as tile
constitutional authority to attach the
seal of State to it, by the parson so at
taching it, the Court must judge and de
cide.
“Suppose a Secretary or President
should attach the grout seal of Stato to a
warrant for the arrest or imprisonment
execution of any one, even the moat
notorious and reckless criminal in the
land, ia the Supreme Court, or any oonrt,
precluded from going behind it, and in
quiring and deording w hether he had any
proper authority for putting it there or
uot? Wo
say no!—and woe be to the
to of this country if such doctrines
shall ever be entertained and sanctioned
by the people! Wo say the Secretary of
State has no more riyhtful authority to
attach the great aoal of State to a prWoJ
motion declaring what is aud what is not
a part of the Constitutinu of the United
States than ho has to a warrant for
the arrest or execution of any person
oithor before or after tijaL It is no part
of hi* duty; and no oourt, understanding
its ddties, with integrity aud firmness to
discharge them, will over pay any more
attention to it in tho ouo case than in the
other. “A- H. S."
As this is a matter of fact, and not
of argument, we simply quote in re
ply the statute of 1818, prescribing
tv* r 41.„ Rtuto-
the duties of tho Secretary of State
“Whenever official notice shall have
been received at the Department of
Stato that an amendment has been
adopted, the Secretary of State shall
cause the amendment to lo published
in the newspapers authorized to pro
mulgate the laws, witli his certificate
specifying the States by which the
same may have been adopted, and that
the same lias become valid aa a part
of the Constitution.”
We maintain tliat the Supreme
Court is precluded from going behind
the certificate, and discussing wheth
er the amendment so certified to is
valid. It is bound to accept the same
as valid. If the door is to be opened
for investigations before the Supreme
Conrt as to the validity of parte of
the Constitution, aud how they came
to be adopted, all ideas on this sub
ject become unsettled. Such investi
gations might be interminable.
We have met with but one case rc
ported where the Supreme Court en
tertained a question of fact as to
whether an amendment to the Con
stitution was constitutionally ratified.
In that caso the point was not made
denying the right of the Court to go
iuto the inquiry.
But if the Supreme Court is com
petent to pass upou the validity o:
amendments duly declared and adqp
tgd, und can by its decision strike
less excuse'for The revolutionary pro
cess of treating them as nullities by
President or Congress. If the Su
preme Court has jurisdiction in the
oa.-e, then it is a judicial question,
und that is the proper tribunal to re
sort to, to nullify the Constitution
or any part of it.—Augusta Constitu
Homilist, Aug. 1L
Head of Third St., Sign of “The New Flag.”
M1ACONJGEOKCHA.
THE LARGEST IN THE SOUTH!
Skilled Labor and Modern Machinery.
All Worm Warranted..
Northern Prices for Machinery Duplicated.
STK.IAI EAftlATES OF .f.fl' MATO AJFn SIZE.
FindlayImproved Circular Satr^mil, JUerchant^WjURearing,
*1 appr * ~-
Fronfs.
it should appear
his Department I
This fiu-t alone is a suffioieul answer to
our coteuqiorary's position, until that
tribunal ahull reverao the principles of its
notion, and abjure tliat jurisdiction for
the future which it lias heretofore exor
cised. Wc have a great deal moro to say
ui>ou tiiis subjest, but must conclude this
article by saying to our cotoinporary that
tho validity of those most fraudulent ao-
callcd Aiucudincnts, the 11th and 16th, is,
hi our judgment, not ouly a Judicial Ques
tion, but a Legislative Question, an Ex
ecutive Question, and also a great popular
question. Thera is, ill our judgment, no
shelter or hiding place forsurli monstrous
iniquities iu any corner or nook of
the country, nor in any branch or
department of the Government —tho
only hope they hnvo. Read Hon. J,
Proctor Knott'* masterly aud graud
speoch upon them publish,xl iu our issue
on Saturday- Imt we must clo*e for tlio
present.
A H. H
NEW ORLEANS CORRES
PONDENCE.
Letter from lvunlioe.
H. .finblag'e Soffit 3vott Works. -®
* Macon Comes to Atlanta Again ! ”
(£tic flcrcutt Sewing fKithinc.
INDLAY’S
WORKS
ndlay's Improved Circular Saw jnui, ducremam
most approved Hind*; Stiffen- AliiI* and Syrup Hcllt**, Iron
Front*,H'lsulow kill* and Lintel* ; dotting* of iron
a
asuf Brass of Every inscription. andAlachinc-
ryof all kinds TO ORDER.
IRON R A I L I N
or Elcs«aXlMlaus.»na«trrloc» Ui»t Defy Competition. «»-S» Ch.rge for New Put Larin in Famishing
Outfit of Mechlnery i n Sew or Mordant MilU.J*
REPAIRING IN ALL ITS BRANCHES !
Competent Workmen furnliliod upon .ppltction to overhaul Englnee, Saw Mllh,. etc.. In enj eecUon of
tho country.
FINDLAY’S SAW -BUST GRATE
SHOULD BE USED BY EVEBV SAW-MILL PROPRIETOR.
Millstones Bcltlnp, Circular Saws, Steam Fittings, Rabbit Metal, etc., etc.
FURNISHED TO ORDER. TERMS, 0A8II OR APPROVED PAPER.
R. FINDLAY’S SONS, Macon, On.
BAR
ECLIPSE
THE GBEATj
Screw Cotton and Hay Press
I* It a Judicial Question 1
In refurence to tho i>ower of the
Supreme Court to pass upon the va
lidity of amendments to the Consti
tution, wc recently stated the propo
sition aud took the negative side, in
the following lauguage:
"This i«, that the validity of the
amendments is a judicial question—that
it ia inoompetent for the Supreme Oonrt
of the United State* upon » can made to
p*** upon the fact, whether the amend
meats were duly proposed and duly rati
fied by tho requisite number of State* ac
cording to the organic law of the Und.—
ild that the ccert* are praciadad
Wahol
from inquiring into tho matter. They
are precluded by the very nature of the
itooeeding from going behind the Great
State which gave unction to the
iinwtaraition ol Secretary Seward, that
he amendment* were constitutionally
"TTn
Jpon this The Atlanta Sun
New Orleans, Aug.8,1871.
New Orleans to-day is in a complete
ferment. Tlio grand Convention
which is to decide the Radical policy
of tho btate of Louisiana, during the
next Presidential canvass, is to come
off.to-morrow. The first fight as
immensely important point,
whether tho Convention should hold
its session at tho.Mechauios’ Institute,
or at’Undo Sam’s Custom lloua*.
terminated in favor of the latter,
whtolt is regarded as u triumph
the Dunnite over the Warmonth par
ty, the Governor having determined
that the Convention should hold its
pow-wom at the Mechanics’ Institute.
It is, at tho presont moment, some
what doubtful which of these factions
will prevail. Both have cnoourag-
ttig prospects. Warmonth will be sus
tained by a numerous body of State
officials, whose continuance in their
places is dependent on his will; hut
opposed to him, stands a powerful
phalanx of Federal officers, the Col
lector of the Port, the Postmaster of
New Orleans, and other well known
wire-workers, backed, it is said, by
President Grant himself.
I The Convention will be a very
checkered body, conijtosed, iu a large
degree, of tho colo.ed element. A
good deal of sport is anticipated, ami
1 shall take an early opportunity to.
give you any intelligence in resjiect
to the aotion of this extraordinary
assemblage, which I think may either
directly or indirectly bear on the po
litical issues of the day. If War-
month fails in maintaining and con
solidating his ascendancy, you need
not bo surprised, should you find him
occupying, ere long, an entirely new
platform. Ho has been sometime past
eudeavoring to kick from nnder him
the underpinning by which he rose to
power—I mean the negrooa, and to
affiliate himself respectably with the
Caucasian race. He is ambitious of
Federal distinctions. If he can-
uot get the next United States Sena-
tonhin from this State that is vacant,
he will wait patiently for the next
that oflera. Iu the meantime, he will
hold on to the Governorship, if he
can, and probably inaugurate a white
man’s party as against tho colored
race, with which he hfts cettaed to fra
ternize as vehemently as formerly.
I suppose yon have seen the Times’
arraignment of yonr Political Editor
in its issue of last Sunday. It ie
queer what blunders the Times com
mits. Ivaxhoe.
Patented Feb’y 27, 1871, by Findlay & Craig.
An ANTI-FRICTION SCREW—A MECITANICAT. WOXDElt. Thi« wonderful Mechanical achievement in
point of RAPIDITY and LUHITXE&S of DRAUGHT, STANDS WITHOUT A RIVAL, and in destined at a
early day k> eupornado ALL OTHER Cotton Screw*, bo they Dibriratod of Wrought or Cast Iron.
CoLAPABcniCR, Ga., Doccmbor 21,1870.
R. FINDLAY’S BON8, Findlay's Iron Worfcfi, Macon, Ga.:
I>kau Hitw-Lato tltia fail l purohased front you ono of your Findlay k Craig Eclipao Patent Screw Cot
ton Presses, and, after a full and fair trial, do not hoaiUto to prononneo it tho most rapid, of li^htoNt
draught, most powerful—In f»ct, the beat (without an ckceptiou) Cotton Press I oVfcr aaw. Do tween this
and all othar Iron Screw Pruasoa I luvo over aeen or used, there !■ just simply no comparison. Every
planter niiould into your Pros*. JOHN L GILBERT.
P. 8.—You mav consider my ordor iu for two moro of tho above Pronsca for next season, and may look
for many nrdftra from this section i my neighbor* aro determined to havo thorn, aa tin y can pa< k by hand
'L r
„ <1 labor-savin* conveniences—
pin, liw a pitch, or full, of f. 1 .,' Inches ; that is,
end*, aa tho oase may bo) 0,> 4 ' inches. The de
vice of tho tubo or nut iu wliioh tlio screw works, is euch aa to materially reduce tlio friction, «o great in tho
common screw ; thereby rendering ittm easy task for threo hands tf) pack a balo of cotton in SALF THE
TIME OF ANY OTHER Iron Screw Press by Iiorso-powcr. [Hoo J. L. Gilbert's cortilicata.) When deal
ble, an Ordinary mule ran bo substituted for throe nu n without change ol fixtures. .STRENGTH, DURA
BILITY, RAPIDITY. LIGHT DRAUGHT, and STANDING 1IOOM attop of box etc., etc., in short, we pro-
nonnooltthe BEST Screw Proas IN THE WORLD, and reftpootfnlly invito a public tent with any and all
other Screw Presses. To purchiuars we GUARANTEE SATISFACTION or REFUND PRICE MONEY.
SEND FOR PRICE LIST, ETC.
B. FINDLAY’S SONS, Muoon, Ga.
-:o:-
CRAIG’S PATENT HORSE POWER,
FOR T>1UVINO COTTON GINH
4F*Simplest, Strongest and Best over yot invented. Gcquiroal
can bo put up XHTIIOVT tho aid of
Halisfatioii Gnarantocd or Moik-j
or Mono,- l{otun<lo<t.
SEND TOR ILLOSTUATBD CIBOtJLXR.
R. FINDLAY’S SONS, Mueoii, On.
Tlie Now Portable Sloaiu
For Driving Cotton Gina, Printing Preaaca, and for any purpose requIHn" front
1 1
rilHSY u>«(« Tlu.fum«c»U«m<m»aed by wrt»r,«ra.pt min-.lo«r. Th- w»t..r heUom I. •
F,,U! K maETn,
TbeoU POSITIVE TOOTXOTIOIt AOX1KNT EXPLOSION. It la , ti.tnr.l ", nr k «rTe.U-r ” u NO
SPABE CAXEHCAPK.NO MATTKU WHAT I’UEL IS DSXD-m kMI B0
■iDff ia4 UinlUr work. A.,rl«l fint promlnm. bj Antrlau inmate uSSr^ !• -»ttoa ,
Olrcutar lad 1’rtce LUt.
klmuu-. B. k A. B. H. maae, nealved toe old olalm. or new order,.
la oottoa cla-
far Deaertpttve
H. FINDLAY’S SONS,
FINDLAY IRON WORKS* MkOON, OA.
VW
5
*4
Q
W
M
W
w
►
H
W
b
A. J. HARALSON,
Corner Marietta and Broad Street*
BE ATE RAC AUCTMAT
COJBAUSSIOAr AtKRCUAA'T,
^HD Wholesale andR*UiII)a«torinFUttNIIDmi*
SV Oaoaignmanta aoliclUd* Ca&h advancc| ou
n—dgnaaeuU for auction tm jion.
nxctcia— Mmu Gordon, WiUu A Co. Bank
era, Wall Street, Atlanta au«* lm.
Georsia—Fnltoa Conti.
IA P. RYAN)
Grondi 4. Btam. )
M»al for Divorce in aaM Oonrt
n appear lug to the Oonrt by tha return of tta
Btutf,Wo»ani« A. Ryau, the Defendant in tha
emutj rS
»— -lana. o, uaa^Sirta^S
J. M. uoxnaea * Bek., PtaloMff *. AtOrniej.
I A true Extract from the miuutoa of aaid Court
, June lat. Inti,
juned-Unitm W. R. VENABLE, Clerk-
LAND FOR HALF.
7Hft ACRES OV Lfiltl)—well tuabmd ia.lv
■ tewd-nudi ail in wood*—400aoraa on l
the McDonough road
, — ef Atlanta. Both tnrta have
SECSS^Tr 5fT^2%rud" w - T ^"' I
i Handtown Road, for
JfMtW
•4A1TL H. STOUT, M. 1)..
Agent Car Introdnation of
Harper 4 Brothers’
educational WORKS.
HFt*0. at Phil 11 pa * Craw,', conun Morlctu
Id PoObh- *—' ----- - -
ad raobhwo atreata, Atlanta. Oa. Judea T. S. Eoa-
tar.laaai alway. prea.nl la attend to baUneee in