Below is the OCR text representation for this newspapers page.

THE ATLAOTA GEORGIAN AND NEWS. WIDXMIUr, FBBgUAUI U, IK. Bad enm an best cured by the famous Sr. Bull's Cough Syrup. It is — a aure pro7ontivn of whooping oouyn and croup. Thousand* of mother* Bare their children from hours of torture and threatening death by It* timely use. . - - {TrirrtfldAe.iiid.lt cured two or i have DR. BULLS COUGH SYRUP DANCED WITH JOY WHEN TOLD HE HAD I ESTATE •MOPU «ent riouc Brannen & .Anthony’s, THE NEAREST DRUG STORE’ Orphan Boy Made Happy By News of Wealth He Would Receive. gpsrlsl to Ths ftoorflii Washington, (Is., Frliruarr U—Tbs la formation ,-nrrled to Tb. Ooorsiaa at tho food foftuno wblrb bn* rome to naor*. and Kiln Hmltb la tbr olin|o’ of a largo inherited rstnte la bwltsrrlsnd wan tb. first DOW. rmluf by tho Motor, of St. In (hi. i liy. wbsra one Joooph srsdemr, of tko rblblrru. Oeoffs Smith, bao boo. taboo .gw of Mono the death of hla motbor I* UN. Tko sisters were r.ry miii-h plot sod with _ _ word of tb _ orphanage In tbl. <-liy slnr* ho wao tbroo roam of 1*0. while tho mtio follow boo ‘ raarhed Iho ago where ho ran fully — tho'algnlflo.noo of llio nnnour • °S _ i|h|i f Urrd In th«* *• ar»~ *»f th© (%lboUc ... ... 0f Atlanta* ft lila father •*With our special attention to telephone orders and mpt delivery service, every family in this city can mu'™. of 1 prompt consider ours “the nearest drug store.” irtllfltrfy ifteMhc ilrpartura to tli*» Philippine#. Ho far llte alatera "f St. Jiwnh of- ' ‘ lit any oth#r ratatlrfa Wl»« waa placed In home, in Havannar bit n.mlug to Waal Dr.Lvra’s ^ hohe uo children ^ TO BE DISCUSSED PBRFKOT Tooth Powder Used by p*oplo of refinsmaat fox over a Quarter of a oeatuzy. Convenient for tourists. pnssAaio py, LJJfTT. - riwx:: of Mid (tita and for themselves, (half associates, aonrwaaara aad assigns. .to bo- o incorporated a ad or I bo atria tad A. R ADAMB COMPANY foil ton* of twenty ftOT y*» tC*l Ilia renews! at the. expiration (SlOOt dolltra noli. P a unnii ui m luamiii, scwiuin. r Toluo of tbecspltal. stock, to a mm not thousand . 'otltlooera do.tr. the right tab*- gtn btiilneM wh.n tb* caplt.l atork hag been aubarribod and M per cent thereof, baa TELEPHONE US FOR ANYTHING THAT COMES FROM A DRUG STORK. AND FOR. ™ ™*XS ' 321 AND 323 WHITEHALL.. ST. OPIUM and WHISKY * nd ,n b ' ,y and dru ‘ * dd,f tfon* nclentlfloiilly treated with- out ahork or never© Buffering after. A homelike, pleaaant. Comfort of patient* carefully looked sanitarium, not a prtnon. Treatment entirely free from any harmful re quite. Our thirty yearn' experience mIiown thexo dii'emtr* are vurabiw. K<*t full partlcvlara, call or addrean The Victor Sanitarium or B. M. Woolley Company, 104 North Pryor Strait, Atlanta, Ga. SUPREME COURT CASES r_r "FILED FOR MARCH TERM I V l+?t*~*'**-*4*M»a V fLong Docket Frorp $ Every preuit in v ", the List. Tuesday wan return day fur March term of the nupretilc court. Oconee Circuit. 1. (trace V. Mean, et ul. 2. Ha*board Air Line Railway ‘Couroey. ■ 3. Kin* v.- Kin*. I. Itrun.wlck and nirniln*hnm Rail- « road Company v. Huodenpyle. S. Plnnebad v. I'lnnetuul. t. Hall v. Davis. 4. Atlantic and Rlrmlngham Railway Company v. Roberaon. by next friend. 5 Hrantley Company v. Huutherand, aheriff. (. Southern Railway Company v. Thompson. 7. Atlantic Coa.t Line Railroad Com. pany v. White. ■_ * Wadley Lumber Company v. Lott. 9 Atlunttc and Hlrmtnirham Railway Company v. Kirkland ct al. 10. Atlantic Coa.t Lino Railroad Company v. Harrl.. II. Baxloy Tie Company v. Simp.on & Harper. 11. Curry v. Curry, lulmx 13. Murray et al. v. Mctlulre. ■ • Atlanta Circuit. L Atlanta Ict> and Coal Company v Rarnee. 3. Morrlo Storage and Tran.for Com- • pany v. Wilke., I. Lelnkauf v. Wellhotue nkibiirnTTH 4. Craddock v. Kelley, iilmr, et al. ’'•-^TMrAj&v, JJAmey. i ■ h.^3t*3A (jpi. CoropkpxV Treat *<* w# • T« \ 7. Htarne* et SI. V. Atlanta lt>Ilce Re lief AaMM'letlon. 0 Lyndon v. Georgia Unllway and KleoUii* C.'ompaoy. 10. Georgia Hallway and Electric Company v. Hamer, by next friend. . 11. Uulnn v. Allen. 12. City of friend. »• fiiirn, ► c4P At^npt v^arper. by next Trin.ii; caoatfMf.. . Company n et al. Viaduct Place 14. Georgia Railway and Electric Dbvtew Company Houchln Mf*. CO, •* A flwafbv.. Harper l«. City of 1J. Morila et al., admra.. v. tiunran li. fia.llnga A-Co. v. Chrl.topher. 13. Itrook. v. City of Atlanta et al. 30. Mt-Uarry et al. v; Sel« et al. 31. (leorala Railway ami F.leelrlc Company v. Town of Ouklund city et Stone Mountain Circuit I Georgia Uranlte R. Co. v. Venable et al. 3. Neal et al. ve. Roykln 3. and Andaman v*. LouIrvIIIo and Nashville Railroad Company et .il. 4. Atlanta and Went Point Railroad Company v. Camp. Alexander v». Thompaon. 0. Weaver vr. Davta ct nl. ?. Weaver vs Pavla el nl. s. Vlrglnla>i'itrollna chemical Com. patiy va. Young. 0. Georgia Railroad and Ranking Company ut nl. va. Town of Decatur. lo. Htone vr. Gurrclt a- IluaaGlt. Middle Circuit. 1. Southern llell Telephone and Tele, graph Company va. Smith 3. Boatwright va. William* 3. Wrtghtavllle and Tennllle Railroad t'omiainy va Oornto. 4. ciaxton, executor, va. Lovett. r>. city of Stateahoro va. Slmmona. «. Ilendrlx va. • Daughtry. 7. Pariah va. Cowart. s. Cahb va. Wrtghtavllle and Tennllle Railroad Company, a. Carter va. Tapley. 10. Macon, Dublin and Savannah Railroad Company va. Joyner 11. Jones va. Roughlon *t al, 13. Walkhr va. Hodges et al. 13. Joyner vs. Macon, Dublin nnd Havnnnnh Railroad Company. 14. Consolidated Portrait and Frnni, Company va. ciaxton et al. IS. Haahlnakl, aurvlvot, ve. Western Cnlon Tclegraidi r'ompeny. 13. White va. Like*. 17. Aetna Insurance Company ' Llpalt* , 13. Wldlncamp va. James. Augusta Circuit. 1. Reynolds et al. vs. Norvell et al. 2. Nugent vs. Watkins. 3. Lucas vs. Southern Railway Com- 4. Gibson va. Wilson. E. Gibson, by next friend, va. Wilson. 8. Johnston, by next friend, va. terprlae Manufacturing Company. 9. Harley va. Riverside Mills. 10. fulhreath va. Martin. 11. Downey va. Pogerty. 12. Phlnlay vs. Bush. 13. Dugiu va. Hammond. Eastsrn Circuit. 1. Drought et al. vs. Poage. 2. Southern Railway Company Rosenheim A Son* 3. Rater-va. Baler. - - 4. Iloltsendorff vi. DeUenne .agd Casualty Atlantic Circuit. I. Zlpserbr vat Seaboard Air Line Ballwdjt Company. ■ *" S j - Maotin Circuit. RedtngtlsM & Co. vs. Hates Ad- vortl-ln* Company. 3. Thomas & McCafferty vs. Selael. aprvlvor. Dunlap Hardware Company v Tliurue.. Si-hofleld v. Little. Durden-ct nl. v. Soulltern Railway Company. ’ Harris v. Raitllisni Railway Com- pany. 7. Mr ran v. Benlt of Forsyth ct al. s. Thomas et al. v, Rosa, et al. ». Wiley, orrty., for u*e, etc., V. June* et nl. • * it. Wollf, for use, etc.,, V. Southern Railway Company. II. Smith et al. v. mayor., et al , of Marietta. » - 12 Dennarfl S Co., v. Rptler. 13. Newberry v. Johnson 14. Rogers v. American Guild et al. 13. Willingham \- Cone v. Hilgueuln HI. Fidelity ami Dc|»>*tt Company of Maryland v. Butler, receiver. 17. Emerson v Knight, for use, etc. 18. Fair v. Metropolitan Life Insut- anco Company. 19. Tabor v, Macon Railway nn l Light Company. 20. Central of Georgia Railway Com pany v. Grlgg.r. tl. Belfert v. Western Cnlon Tele graph Company. ‘ Central ul tleotgln Railway Com pany v. Ray. 23. Robinson v. Southern Railway Company. 24. Hendlrv v. Adams. Northern Circuit. 1, Pearson v. t'out-son ot al, 2 Hank of Sparta v, Rutts. 3. Palmer v Ingram. 4, Harden et nl., next friends, V. , and „ , ‘TVKUbfct or mi perauUrj gain and |»rom ok iib ■iw»noia- eta. and for that Mrpoor they pFopoao to carry on a bnslaeaa of bayihff. arllfng and manufacturing all kinds of dry goods, no- ds, ooreltJes and knit Ilona. Idttkcr -goods, tho : vest the proceeds of thr corporation In ancji manner as *" “ “— ers, lo iris! f or tho government <>r the corporation and t« officers, ami geuernlly to do any and all tblu^r* usual, necessary and expidl^nt in rled on. C. The prluclpnl nfrico nnd boms of aatd ror|M»rstloii wilt l>e In Fulton county, Goar* gtn. hut petitioners desire for said corpora tion the right go do business lu and to os- All Intonated In the klafergertob. the bane end (be children of AUesU are la- *1t«t to sites,] IS- Mat la*.flag of tk. AtUktx •odologlr.l Sotlsty which win be bald la Carnegie library oa Tbaradsy svau- Isg at d o'clock. Bavanl ldletaeUng peyera M the relation of tbs Madwgxftaa to the koaie will riBSUARY 8HIPMBNT8 MAY BRRAK ALL RECORDS. •tfectal la Tbs Gcnglam. Brunswick, da* Fob. II.—It le Very probable that the February (hipping record tar the port of Brunswick will unusually targe one, notwith standing Iho fact that a strike ha* ob during the month. If this maintained during the ra il will far ex- malndar of tbs month oee* that of January, which was con eidtred to ba unusually good. Many vessels have come .Into port Isoe the first of the month, WHIle over twenty which arrived during January will dear apd sail duriag February. DEBATERS ARE SELECTED AT BMpRY COLLEOE. Special to Tbs Georgies. Oxford, as, Feb. It,—May debaters have been chosen a*, follows: Phi 6eminW—w. C. Cooper. Nor wood. Oa; A. L Moore, Condor, Oa, and Horace Bandlford, Oxford. Oa Few—l. T. Pearson, Richland. Oa 8. C. Morgan, Tusculum. Oa.. end J. N. Townsend. Tlfton, Oa The February-debate has been post poned until March 1. INVITATIONS FORWAROED TO PROMINENT GEORGIANS lories sail po«*c*»loas of the Uni. Wherefore- ncillloncra pray Utst they ba ode a laxly corporate uimer tb* UBS autl style aforskald, with all ut the rlgbta prlri- leges heroin prayed anil to which they ad f.y Inw. W. It. TKilENOIt. I'.tltJontr* Attorney. of Feb- uiay lie eSIltlod Filed In offl, il.ry, 1,07. Clerk Huperlor Court, Fulton Coanty, On. Special to The Georgian. Macon, Oa, F>b. lit.—Thousands of invitations have been forwarded prominent business men In Georgia by W. J. Dontan, secretary of Hie Geor gia Immigration Association. These In vitations ore directed to men In all the -Aqlk- of business |tf« and enclosed with ?ach Ibvltntton ls ti private curd upon which the twply may be written. From the Interest that has been dis played throughout the stats In the con ference 4n Macon on life 13th. one of the largest end most representative gatherings ever seen In this city Is to be exiiected. I, Arnold Broyles, clerk trm- anil correct,copy of the spirt chartsr In the matter ot the A. H. Adams psuy, bs the same appears of file In this C orpin Witness niy hand and seal of office this the Dtb itay of February, 11817 ARNbf.D RROYI.ER. Clerk Huperlor Court, Knlton County, Gs. IHeeb. stockholders of the Georgia tlranltc Hull CnniUer building, Atlanta, Gs.. .on the »tli day of. February, 1307. al 10 o clock a. tii., at xrmetnm tssnsare of Ik* tmnd* —f th* rood wUl Uc C'Jti*Mcrcrt_ hjr Its Becrehiry stockholders. W. U. FAIT Ueorgla Rallrmul Company. S. Hinton v. Brower. fi. Harrison, ailmr., V. Hnrrlaon. 7. Bowen, Jewell A Co., v. Adams. 8. Mellon v. Browr. Bros Western Circuit. 1. Gresham v. Hewolt. 2. ‘ Pylant v. Webb. 3. Lively rt nl. v. Hunter, cxr.” 4. Stocking v. Moury. * E. Gower v. Fowler. ti Edwards V. Hale. 7. cable ?oni|>any v. Hancock 8. Van Winkle Gin and Machine inks v. Pittman et at. 3. Van Winkle Oln and Machine Workn v. Mathews et nl. 10. Jordan v. Dooly. 11. Western Union Telegraph Compa ny v. Cooper. 12. Bank of Lawrencevllle v. Rock- inure A Co. 13. Rucker. r"o river, v. Williams. 14. Harris v. Clcghorn. 15. Harris ct ul. v. Equitable Securl- rs company. Nsrthsastsrn Circuit. 1. Tallulah Falls Railway Company v. Purls. 2. Paris v. Tallulah Falls Railway anpnny. 3. Williams v. Tallulah Falls Hall- ,iv Company. t. White et al. v. North Georgia Electric Company et al. Mayor, etc., of Gainesville v. Mll- Cornclla Planing Mill Company Wilcox. Capps v. Edwards. Hawkins v. Tanner. Brackett et nl. V. Etowah Gold pps v. Eduards. 11. Roberta V. Dot-kins. 12. Roberts v. Docklns. 13. Tallulah Falls Railway Company Harris. Blua Ridgs Circuit. 1. Brooks v. Day et ak 2. Center v. McKinney. 3. Venable v. Burton. Venable . Ratclirre V. Smith ot al.-. commis sioners. • Chsrokss Circuit. - 1. Western and Atlantic ttbllroad Company v. Clark, ndmlntatrator. Z' Western and AtUn “ Company v. Loughiidfie. 3. Baker V. Keever. 4. Southern Railway Company Puryaar.' antic RaMroad 5. North Georgia Milling Company v. Henderson Elevator'Company. ' rt. Loutsvllls and Nashville Railroad Company et al. v. Hurt. 7. Western and ’Atlantic Railroad Company v. Tate ct al. Roms Cirouit. 1. -Shahan v. Love. 2. (lavender v. Atkins. 3. Van DyltC V. Menlo Fruit'Co. 12. Irey et al. r. (illy.of Rnjno at al.. 4. Johnston v. Oeorgla Loan A Trust No Need To Suffer WRITE US FREELY and frankly, la strictest confidence troubles, and Mating your age. mi ADVICE, in pistn Mated envelope, and a vsl- teUInc sH your We «1U send you l M-tugt Back an “Homs Tree to-, cot for Women Address; Lbdtet* Advisory Ocptriswitt, The Chattanooga MoSdne Co., CbstUnoo*s, Tsuo., Why Be Sick? \ Ladles, do you suffer from headache, backache, sldeache, waist- pains, Irregular habit, weakness, nervousness, irritability, general mis* erableness and lack of ambition? If so, much of your pain and suffering Is needless, for It Is due to diseases peculiar to your sex, which can be cured by proper treatment For over 50 years Wine of a0 Cardin’^ ’S has been beaol|tlng the** disease! In the parsons of over a million women, of whom Mn. W. H. Gage, of 232 N. Clark St.. Chicago, la one. She writes; ‘I waa taken sick three years ago and was In bed six months. Since than I have been troubled with head ache, backache, leg-ache and avfut bearing-down palm. I could get no relief until I began ta take Wine of Cardul. I have now been taking It about six weeka and f feel like a new woman. My friends hardly know me." Tiy It for you r trouble. At Every Drug Store in $1.00 Bottles 5. 8lm» V. Rchcusslcr. 6. Hill A Moqltrle v. Wheeler. 7. Smith ot Al. V. Moore, admr. 8. Chtdsey et ul. V. Brookes et nl. 9. Brookea et al. v. Chldsry et nl. 10. Gordon v. West. it. Town of East Rome v. City of Roma et al. 12. Walker v. Hlllyer. 13. Danmond V. Hlllyer. for use. etc. Tallapoosa Cirouit. 1. Whlsenant v. Southern States Portland Content Co. 2. (Ydartown Cotton A Export Co. V. Miles. 3. Stewart v. Marietta Trust A Banking Co.. James v. Cooledge A Bro. Southern Railway Co. v. Harde man. Cowata Circuit. Atlanta A West Point R. Co. v. Hudson. 2. sterling v. Park. 3. American Beverage Co. v. Atlanta Beverage Co. Flint Cirouit. 1. Woolsey at al. va, Lawehe. 2. t-RWshe vs. Woolssy si al. 3. Thornton at al. va. Jackson, exr. 4. Southern Railway Company i Poi>e. J* fttn BBWTMve N6(l - AlcofeoHc TONIC of the day, made entirely of native medicinal roots and without a drop of alcohol in its composition, is known a$ DR. PIERCE’S GOLDEN MEDICAL DISCOVERY. There are no secrets about its com* position—all its ingredients being printed on the bottle-wrappers. The "Golden Medical Dacovery” not only builds up the strength of the feeble, debilitated, languid, nervous and easily fttigtftd, wheth er young or aged, but it enriches and purifies the blood, thus making the improvement lasting. It corrects and overcomes indi gestlon, dyspepsia, biliousness, tor pid liver, chronic diarrhea and kindred derangements of the stom ach, liver and bowels. Bronchial, throat and laryngeal affections, attended with hoarseness, persistent cough, and all mariner of catarrhal affections are cared by the "Golden Medical Discovery." Inf Chronic Nosdl Catarrh, it is well to cleanse the Basal passages ont freely with Dr. Sage's Catarrh Remedy fluid while ' taking the "Golden Medical Discovery’’ ax a constitutional treatment. Old ob stinate cases of catarrh yield to this thorough count of treatment. Through enriching And purifying the blood, the "Discovery" cures scrofulous affections, also blotches, pimples, eruptions, and other ugly affections of'the skin. Old, open, running sores, or nlcers, are healed by taking the “Golden Medical Dis covery" internally Brid applying Dr. Pierce’s AlWHeallrig Salve ak a. local dressing,'- The Salve can by return mail on receipt of 5* cents in stamps. Address Doctor Pierce as below for it. In short " Golden Medical Dis. covery ” regulates, purifies and in* vigurates the -whole system and thus cures a very large range of diseases. The reason Why it curies such a varied list of diseases is made clear in a little booklet of extracts from the leading medical authorities, compiled by Dr. R. V. Pierce, of Buffalo, N. Y„ and which he will be pleased to send post-paid and entirely free to any who send him their names and addresses. Ypsef'tafMtivx. ept a sub* stitnte of iMstfimrii "composition for this non-secret mbdicine of KNOWN COMPOSITION. Dr. Pierce’* Pleasant Pellets cure con- ■tipation. Constipation is the came of many dileases. Cor* the cause end voo epra the disease. One " Pellet" i* 1 S mtle laxative, and two • mild ctthir- c. Druggists sail them, and nothing is "just u good." They ore the original Little Liver Pill* first put np bv old Dr. Pierce over 40 year* ago. Much mg,'- iueoaive can eiotttfconnd oow." Addreta Dr be had of druggists, or «fll be sehtia* abort. ** '' imitated, bat never equaled. They in granules — euy is tiny sugar-coated take at candy. Dr. Plaice’s Medical Adviiar (lOri) page*) Is sen* Aw on nN^t of n one- cent stamps (to cover cost of txsailingl for psper-eoTeird, or 81 stamps for ‘ ~ rlerci llwny Company Jordan. • 7. McDonald vs. Siwoll, sheriff 8. Uoortwyn vs. Uentral of Oeorgla Railway Company. 9. Thompaon va. Recliham. ID. Beckham et al. va. Beckham. 11. Barham ct nl. vs. Weems et al. 12. Redman Broth -rs va Mays. II. Houlharn Railway Company vs. Tollerson. 13. Hodgaa va. City of Jackson el al. Oomulge* Circuit. 1. Price va. Price al al. 2 Maynard et al. vs. Oreer at at. 3. Brooks vs. Robson. 4. Robert et al. vs. Kslly. E. Kelly va flobet t et al. (. Cheney vs. Louisville and Nash ville Railroad Company at si. 7. Rousch Jrs. Green. 8. Rhodes, Dolvln A Co. vs. Con tinental FuroflUr* Company. 3. Hall ve;"Co*U et al. 10. Georgia RhlnoEd and Banking Company-vat Lloyd. 11. Loulavlllg^ aifl Nashville Rail road Company aval. vs. Varner. 12. Mayor, ate., of Madison vs. Thom as. by next-Niskid.. 13. Mason el al. vs. Terrell, governor. ChaAahoaoha* Circuit. 1. Baldwin ti Lowe. 2. Swift vs. Swift et al. 1. McDaniel va. ‘twin Manufacturing Company. * 4. Olddan *1 al. vs. qiddens. 3. Fay A Eagan Company va. Dud ley A Boos. , 3. 8lory. vs. Bull. 7. Central of Georgia Railway Com pany va. toman A Co. 8. Central ot Oeorgla Tlallway Com- f va. b -- - - pany va. Inman. Akers A Inman. 9. Eagle A Phenlx Mills vs. Muscogee Manufaoturlng. Company. PatsLla Cirouit - ‘ I. Smith vs. 8k*|ipard. x. Strickland, administratrix, va Thnrhton A Nosworthy. 3. Randolph County vs. Ellis. 4r-Gftv*F xra^AIIller. 3. Sorrels vs. Matheas. ». Earir county vs. Fain. 7. Hartford Fire Insurance Company 1. Liddell Company. / (. MaiWllltams st al. vs. Jacobs et al. Southwestern Cirouit. 1. Vogt Machine Company va. Bai ley. 2. Hougabook Vs.' Atlantic and Birmingham Railway Company. v 3. Jackson vs. Williams. 4. Clark, administrator, vs. Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York. Cerdols Circuit. 1. Clark A Williams vs. Empire Mercantile Company. 2. Merchants' and Farmers’ Bank vs. Seaboard Air Line Railway Companv. I. Cordcle Sash, Door and Lumber Company v. Wilson Lumber Company. 4. Glenn, sheriff, v. Graham, solicitor general. , Albany Circuit. 1. Glllts v. Pow'ell. 2. Broun v. Brawn. .1. Britt v. Davis. I. Worth County v. Sikes, treasurer. 5. Georgia Southern and Florida Railroad Company v. Greer. 3. Simpson A Harper 8. Handers A Jenkins ct ul. 7. Martin, executor, v. Monroe. 8. Varner V. Thompson et al. 9. Allen A < o. V. Hastings Industrial Company. 10. Commercial Union Assurance Company, limited, of London, v. Chut- lahoochee Lumber Company. II. i.tvlngiton & Stawurt v. King. 13. Askcv.- v. Thompson. Southern Circuit. 1. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Com pany v. Hart Lumber Company. 2. Bell v. Foss. 3. Hand Trading Company v. Jones. 4. Austin v. Feral'* Sons A Co. 6. Taylor v. Chambers. 6. Gress Company v. Berry Bros, 'limited. 7. Clarke v. Knowles. 8. Monk v. Oay. 3. Supreme Lodge Knights of Pvthlss v. Crenshaw. 10. Gray r. Swindle. 11. Cortor *4 al, v. Carroll, executor. 12. Dulum Grocery Company v. Ty son A Vickers. 13. Melnhard, Bchaul A Co., V. Fol som Bros. 14. Durant Lumber Company v. Sin clair A 81ms Lumber Company. 13. Ford, administrator, v. Clark. 16. Penn v. Georgia Southern and Florida Railway. 17. Clark v. Clark. 18. Walker v. MrCant, guardian. 19. Crosby v. Putman. 20. Drawdy, administrator, v. Hes-‘ tar*, guardian 21. Green et oL v. Hutchinson. T. & Certified byjCourt o* Appeals. COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA dir, Cam Argued and Submitted Mi February 11, 1W7. / 78—E. W. Rucker vs. Tabor A Al mond. from City court or .Elberton »—W. D. Perktdx AV al, vs. J M. Terrell, governor, from city couri of Washington. 10—F. C. Austin vs. N. O. Long, frora court ofWushlngtnn. *1—M. E. Chapman V*. O. F Con- wsll, from Elbert. 82— D. At. Ferry A Co. vs. Slattox h Turner^Trom Elbert. 83— Houthern Cotton Oil Company va Jim Gladman, from city court of Wash ington. 80 rtfy 84— C. N. Bond ct al. vi. C. I. Kidd, from city court of Elberton. 85— George Williams vs. Fain A Stamps, from Wilkes. 86. 17—R. L. Moss Manufacturing Company v«. Carolina Portlnml Ce ment Company and vice versa, from city court ot Athens. 88— W. R. Hearn at al. vs. I!. H. Oower, from city court of Monroe. 89— Bouthern Railway Company vs Chestnut Mountain Merchandise com pany, from Hall.' 90— Houthern Railway Company va Oliver A Morrow, from Hall. 91— Joe Landrum vs. W. II. Smith, from Hall. 93— Houthern Railway Company *t al. vs. W. M. Miller, from'cliy court » Hall. 91—Houthern Railway Companv va J. E. Rowe, from city court of Hall county. 94— J. L. Landrum Vi. A. Y. M"*A from Cobb. *5—W. A A. Railroad Company va J. W. Clark, administrator, from < »• loos a. , „ „ 86— H. E. Chapman at at. v* M. E. Taliaferro, from Catooaa. 87— J. C. Johnson VS. Mrs Douglas, from Gordon. 38—J. T. Payne vs. J. from Gordon. . ... 89—Mack Charles v». H. L. Brooke., from Whitfield. , 101—J. F. Oraaa vs. Barry Wrlgh. from city court of Floyd county 1*2—R. Underwood at al. vs B*** A Heard, from Walker. 101—J. H. Reynold* vs. J. B. from Floyd. , lOI-Jess. Beck vt. Standard m«« H. Sirv*nt Mills, from city totlrt bt Polk oonnty- 1U—Lot Favors vs. M. I-. Hath! oca from Douglas. ' ,, , 106— City of Codartawn v* > ■ ' Brooks, from city court of'l'olk c ' un '-' 107— Atlanta and Blrmlngh Lina Rallwpy Company vs Manus, from-etty court of Poll, Me 1