Newspaper Page Text
PAGE 4A
BARROW JOURNAL
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 17, 2016
Opinions
“Private opinion is weak, but public opinion is almost omnipotent. ”
~ Henry Ward Beecher -
Of spring, presidential voting and making a stand
Real beauty isn’t plastic
Items from my reporter's notebook as /
hope spring arrives soon:
• The weatherman (pick whichever one
you prefer) is calling for warmer tempera
tures for the rest of the week. Personally,
I’m glad.
With spring sports now underway, few
things are tougher than standing outside
with the temperature in the
40s (or colder) and the wind
howling. For those who have
been to an Apalachee High
School baseball game this
time of the year, you know
what I’m talking about. It’s
the only place I’ve ever had to
leave an event because it was
simply too cold to tolerate.
• Barrow County, as well as
voters across the state, have
been taking part in early vot
ing which began Feb. 1 and
continues through Feb. 26.
(Note: I ventured to the Barrow County
Elections Office last Thursday to cast my
ballot.)
Georgia’s official date for the 2016 pres
idential primary is March 1. Secretary
of State Brian Kemp successfully moved
Georgia’s primary up to take part on the
same day as several other states, cre
ating what he termed a “Southeastern
Conference” primary.
Certainly, the voice of Georgia voters
is as important as those of Iowa or New
Hampshire or South Carolina or Nevada
or anywhere else for that matter. Often
we are not treated that way by presidential
candidates, however, due to the fact that
our state’s primary was not among the first
few to take place.
South Carolina is on deck for the
Republicans this upcoming Saturday while
Democrats will caucus in Nevada. The two
states will flip flop the following Saturday.
• Speaking of the presidential election,
I’m going to go out on somewhat of a
steady limb and say if Donald Trump wins
the South Carolina primary on Saturday
then we are going to see a snowball effect
take place.
Trump rolled to a win in New Hampshire
despite many slanted political commenta
tors trying to predict a big Trump collapse
in the state. A victory that large is probably
not in the works in South Carolina, but
even a Trump win by six to eight points
(he is currently up from 15 to 22 percent
in most South Carolina polls) would be
a huge win for him in a state that actually
favors a candidate like Ted Cruz, on paper
at least.
Trump has defied most political
“experts” from the day his campaign
began. Footnote: What happened to those
who said Trump would drop out of the
race before Iowa? It seems we
haven’t heard from them of late.
Even with Trump making sev
eral campaign appearances in
South Carolina, he has been
holding rallies in other states as
well. That’s a sign of a candidate
who has confidence he is going
to be the nominee. He is not
solely focused on one state, but
making his campaign viable in
numerous states.
We’ve still got a long ways to
go in this campaign season, but
clearly the story has been the rise
of Trump’s candidacy, something many
tried to convince us would never get off
the ground.
• The recent series of columns by
Barrow Journal co-founder and co-pub
lisher Mike Buffington has caused quite a
bit of feedback. Many people have asked
me about the columns (see the latest on
page 5A in today’s edition) and whether
Mike fears any backlash from law enforce
ment over his single pot plant protest over
the use of medical cannabis.
Clearly no one wants to be arrested
and that includes Mike. However, if you
are going to seriously take a stand for (or
against) something, then you have to be
willing to accept whatever consequences
happen.
As the person who oversees the edito
rial part of the Barrow Journal, as well
as all of its sister publications, Mike has
always told his editors and reporters to be
prepared to stand your ground when nec
essary. If a government meeting is closed
when it is not supposed to, then we have
been told not to leave the meeting.
Not long after I began working for this
company in 2005, Mike and I went to
the scene of an accident in neighboring
Jackson County. Mike was going to take
pictures and I was there to obtain whatev
er information I could about the accident,
which unfortunately was a deadly one.
One of the deputies on the scene tried
to tell Mike where he could and could not
be. Mike calmly told the deputy he was not
in the way of anything and that he would
continue to take pictures from the vantage
point he was at. The deputy continued to
insist Mike move at which time my boss
called the sheriff and told him he needed
to talk to his deputy about trying to prevent
him from doing his job.
The phone was handed to the deputy
and after 30 seconds or so of conversa
tion, nothing else was said to Mike. I
remember wondering at the time, how
ever, if I would be going to the newspaper
office that afternoon alone with my boss
in the back of a sheriff’s deputy’s car after
being handcuffed.
That didn’t happen, but I witnessed
first hand how Mike handled it. My mind
flashed ahead to a future edition which
said “Newspaper publisher arrested” with
a pic of him being taken away.
On Mike’s fight to make medical can
nabis accessible for those who need it, it
seems like such a non-issue. This is some
thing which should be between a doctor
and patient. There is no need for politi
cians or law enforcement to be involved.
However, the times we still live in dictate
there are those involved who shouldn’t be.
From a strict Libertarian standpoint,
marijuana should be legal for any reason.
If it were legal tomorrow, the criminal
element would be eliminated. Some law
enforcement groups are certainly against
it since it would not allow as many “cus
tomers” in county jails and not allow for
the seizure of personal property, often
before any type of trial or conviction takes
place.
Legalizing medical cannabis is certainly
something whose time has long since
passed. There should be no restrictions
on what a person can use it for in terms
of medical reasons. If a doctor and patient
agree it’s best to use or try, then that
should end the discussion.
It’s time for politicians, law enforce
ment, district attorneys and judges to get
out of the way.
• Finally, for those who claim that the
judicial process is separate from the politi
cal process, watch what transpires con
cerning the nomination of a new Supreme
Court judge.
Chris Bridges is editor of the
Barrow Journal. You can reach him at
cbridges@barrowjournal. com.
chris
bridges
The religious freedom battles have started
Barbie has evolved. Mattel, the company that
creates the iconic toy, recently revealed new
options for the doll’s appearance.
Barbie is now available with 24 eye colors, new
hairstyles and with seven skin tones. And she
can now stand up on her own feet. The new
design removes the permanent arch of Barbie’s
foot, allowing her to stand up without her plastic
heels.
But the more notable
change to the doll’s form
- or at least, the most talk
ed about - is the addition
of three new body types.
Those on the market for a
new Barbie can now find
one with a petite, tall or
curvy frame. The original
doll frame is still available
to purchase, but the new
bodies add diversity to a toy
that is popular among young
girls in the country.
The change reflects a
larger cultural shift towards
body acceptance, as a new wave of women push
back against the idea that beauty is confined to
a certain size. Beauty no longer means thinness,
or tallness, or shortness...or whatever physical
qualifier. And Barbie’s change reflects that. The
new body types show that, yes, you can be beau
tiful no matter your size. But is it enough?
Creating a plastic doll to represent a real human
is naturally conflicting. Barbie is perfect. Original
Barbie, tall Barbie, petite Barbie, curvy Barbie...
they are all perfect. Their skin, make-up and
hair are perfect. Their bodies are molded into a
perfect hourglass shape. Their clothes always fit.
But real women aren’t perfect. Our human bod
ies stretch, wrinkle, roll, dimple and eventually
sag. Our faces get pimples. Our hair turns gray.
Fat starts to accumulate in places it really and
logically should not be. We aren’t plastic. We
aren’t perfect.
Over the past 55 years, many girls, including
myself, have looked at the Barbie doll as a sym
bol of beauty. She has grown to represent our
culture’s desire for unattainable perfect beauty.
The blame doesn’t fall solely on Barbie’s per
fectly sculpted shoulders. The doll is just a part
of a larger culture of photo-enhanced advertise
ments, overly whitened teeth, and products that
offer the false promise that we can achieve the
unachievable.
We change our bodies with surgeries and injec
tions. We enhance our features with mascara and
blush. We fight natural aging with ointments and
creams that likely do more harm than good.
I’ve made my fair share of attempts to achieve
the unattainable over the years. I’ve waxed,
teased, plucked, poked. I’ve accidentally burned
my neck with a curling iron. I’ve tweezed my
eyebrows to the point where I looked more alien
than human. I’ve washed my hair with mayon
naise. I’ve tried very hard, but none of my efforts
resulted in perfection.
There’s no harm in wanting to look your
best, but the pressure to look perfect is danger
ous. Some develop eating disorders, or have a
botched plastic surgery. Some permanently dam
age their skin with chemical peels, or ignore the
dangers of sun exposure.
Many develop a low self-esteem, because
they’re constantly unable to live-up to what cul
ture says is good. And having a plastic doll that
preserves these ideals of perfection is dangerous.
I’m not saying we need to toss out all of our dolls
or declare a boycott. But more of an emphasis
should be placed on the value of real beauty. We
should teach the value of all women’s real beauty,
instead of confining it to a fake and plastic beauty.
You can be tall, petite or curvy, and beautiful.
But you can also be real and beautiful.
Alex Pace is a reporter with the Barrow
Journal. She can be reached at apace@barrow-
journal.com.
Whatever happened to
faith, hope, and love?
I was taught those
Christian virtues at a very
young age, but they were
scarcely in evidence
last week as members
of the Georgia House of
Representatives debated
one of the “religious free
dom” bills that has been
introduced this session.
Instead, I heard a lot of
anger, fear, and hostility.
Of the eight religious
freedom bills that are pending,
tom
crawford
the
House was considering one of the mild
er versions, the “Pastor protection” bill
that keeps preachers from being sued
if they don’t want to perform same-sex
wedding ceremonies.
Legislative leaders like Speaker
David Ralston supported the measure
because they hoped it would satisfy
the wishes of conservative legislators
who are determined to pass a religious
freedom bill this year.
“We can draw lines in the sand, we
can lash out at those who oppose
us and remain intractable, or we can
seek out common ground and move
forward together,” Ralston said. “What
the bill does is address real concerns
from constituents all over the state of
Georgia.”
Several lawmakers, however, made
it clear they want to vote on other reli
gious freedom bills that would be more
far-reaching in their effects.
“This bill doesn’t cover Georgians like
me, in my opinion,” said Rep. Kevin
Cooke (R-Carrollton). “I believe it is our
responsibility to protect all Georgians
and I don’t think this bill goes far
enough.”
“This bill only starts it,” insisted Rep.
Ed Setzler (R-Acworth). “This is an
important protection, but friends, we
have to do more. If we stop here and
don’t go further, we have not done our
duty.”
As the debate moved along, some
lawmakers seemed downright angry
that they should even have to talk about
gay marriages being legal.
“The religious community
is being persecuted ... the
religious community is being
attacked,” Rep. Paul Battles
(R-Cartersville) declared.
“It may be the last time the
people of God can stand up
and say, ‘enough is enough.’
Enough is enough, and we
speak today when we vote yes
to this legislation.”
All of these proposed bills
that would protect the religious
liberties of besieged Christians
are yet the latest example of legislators
searching for a solution to a problem
that doesn’t exist.
If you want to talk about genuine reli
gious persecution, take a few moments
and read about the extermination of
six million Jews during World War II.
Nothing even close to that is happening
in Georgia.
There are no recorded incidents of
any Baptist preacher or Methodist min
ister being jailed because they would
not perform a same-sex wedding cer
emony. The First Amendment has pro
tected the clergy for more than two
centuries.
People aren’t being arrested because
they choose to go to services at a par
ticular place of worship, nor is anyone
putting a gun to someone’s head and
forcing them to attend a church they
don’t believe in.
If Christians are being persecuted so
strenuously, as lawmakers contended
during last week’s debate, then how do
you account for the fact that more than
70 percent of the American population
in public surveys identifies its religious
affiliation as Christian?
There are evidently a substantial
number of people who never took the
time to study the U.S. Constitution and
don’t have a very deep knowledge of
American government. They believe
they’re going to be overrun by hordes
of vengeful gays with marriage licenses.
“I started getting a lot of phone calls
from pastors I knew in my district and
other districts who were concerned and
afraid about it (the Supreme Court’s
gay marriage ruling),” said Rep. Kevin
Tanner (R-Dawsonville).
“I got a call from a woman who was
crying because she was sure her hus
band would go to jail for refusing to
violate his faith (and perform a same
sexwedding),” Tanner recounted. “I felt
we needed to do something other than
words to reassure our faith community.”
State government isn’t going to force
anyone to attend a gay wedding if they
don’t want to. It’s silly to think that.
On the other hand, it’s obvious that
some folks still need some reassuranc
es. That’s why we’re destined to hear
a lot more debate over these religious
bills in the last few weeks of the General
Assembly session.
Tom Crawford is editor of The
Georgia Report, an internet news ser
vice at gareport.com that reports on
state government and politics. He can
be reached at tcrawford@gareport.
com.
Barrow Journal
Winder, Barrow County, Ga.
www.BarrowJournal.com
Mike Buffington...
Co-Publisher
POSTMASTER:
Send address changes to:
Scott Buffington..
Co-Publisher
The Barrow Journal
77 East May Street
Winder, Georgia 30680
Chris Bridges
Editor
Published 52 times per year by
Jessica Brown....
Photographer
Mainstreet Newspapers, Inc.
Susan Treadwell
Reporter
Periodicals postage paid at
Winder, Georgia 30680 (USPS 025-132)
Alex Pace
Reporter
Email: news@barrowjournal.com
Sharon Hogan....
Reporter
Phone: 770-867-NEWS (6397)
Fax: 678-425-1435
Member
SUBSCRIPTIONS:
Georgia Press Association
National Newspaper Association
$25.00/yr.