Newspaper Page Text
PAGE FOUR
’ REGIMENTAL
(MIRROR]
Office: Building 73
Published Every Thursday by and for the Enlisted Men of the Academic
Regiment. The Infantry School, Fort Benning. Qa
THURSDAY, MAY 4, 1944
The REGIMENTAL MIRROR receives Camp Newspaper Ser
vice material. Republication of credited matter prohibited with
out permission of CNS, 205 E 42 St . N Y C., 17
COL E P. PASSAILAIGUE LT VERNON C HOYT
Commanding Advisor
SGT. WALTER MILLER ■ • • Editor
Cpl Johnston C. Woodall Assistant Editor
Pvt. J une Freed Secretary
INFANTRY DAY CONTESTS AID
TO PERSONAL "ORIENTATION"
The announcement of Infantry Day contests by both
The Infantry School and the Academic Regiment head
quarters should receive warm response from members of
this command, who are on the threshhold of the crucial
hour in their military career. Most men of this regiment
will be overseas as combat Infantrymen before the year is
out and will be present when the great decision is made
against the enemy at close quarters. In the quiet way that
the American soldier has, each and every G1 in the outfit
is thinking about his part and preparing himself in mind
and body for his graduation to the more active branch of
the Doughboys. No contest could be announced at a more
fruitful time in world history or in local affairs.
Those men who have returned from combat will not
have to think very hard for subject matter for the con
tests. But men who are yet to go have something just as
important to say. They have an unusual opportunity to
put into creative form the very things they have been
mulling over in their minds as they await reassignment.
We are naturally proud to be in the Infantry—that branch
of the service which, significantly, gets more and more
recognition as the war develops. The Army itself has made
two important gestures expressing the importance of the
Infantry. First there came the announcement of the Com
bat and Expert Infantryman badges; then came the 275,-
000 new ratings passed out to combat Infantry outfits.
Recognition from enlisted men in other branches of the
service has come too in the thousands of applications flood
ing the War Department for transfer to the Infantry!
But now, for the first time, we have a chance our
selves to express OUR feelings in the matter. We have
always been proud of the vital part WE have played in the
training of combat leaders and technicians for the Infan
try. We are even prouder now that when our men go
‘over” they will be in on the ground floor of the fight—
literally! Our feelings are important. What do we ex
pect? What are we going to do? Why are we going to
do it? Why are we proud that we’ll be wearing the blue
of the Infantry?
Questions like these will figure in many entries to
the contests, which will help us formulate those final ideas
we all like to have in mind when we get ready for an im
portant step.
11TH STREET USO WELCOMES
CONTEST WRITERS, ARTISTS
Academics interested in com
peting for the $250 worth of
bonds offered as prizes in the
Infantry Day contest have been
invited by the 11th Street USO
in Columbus to use the center’s
facilities while working on their
entries
Water colors, oil paints, brush
es and other supplies for artists
are available, according to Miss
Mabel Boles, program director.
‘‘For those Gls and WACs who
are interested in creative writ
ing, our second floor lounge is
open for use. We will do every
thing possible to create the prop
er conditions for serious writ
ing,” Miss Boles said
Two separate contests have
been announced for Infantry
Day, to be celebrated on June
15th. The Infantry School con
test, open to all military person
nel at Benning, offers a SIOO
Phone 3046
bond for the best literary work
and a SIOO bond for the best art
work on the theme of “The
American Infantry and The A
merican Infantryman.” Entries
must be submitted to The Infan
try School public relations office
by May 31st. The School contest
judges will be announced short
ly.
The second contest, open only
to enlisted personnel of the Aca
demic Regiment, offers a SSO
bond for the best expression, in
any form or medium, on the same
theme. Entries to the regimental
contest must be submitted to the
Academic Regiment public re
lations office by May 31st. Gls
may enter one, or both contests,
but except in the cases of large
plastic art forms which can be
made in only single copies,
a separate copy of each work
must be submitted for each con
test
REGIMENTAL MIRROR
THE MARSHALL ISLANDS
. ;
® National Gao^raphk Society RiL >r
Distributad by C.MA. DlKar [Pawsonj
[Brown]Bikini^ Rongelap .
^ORongerik Utink [Kutuzov]
Ailinginae*©^ ’ Taka**
[ENIWETOK |
Hr
^Ujelang [Providence] 4 / V&Likiep ^^^^TTWOTJEI
* y* Ro I WWWSJW
Ujae« Z HnH [Menshikov] ^Erikub
[Katharine]'*' ♦ ... SV
Lae/*’ '♦Kwajalein Maloelap 4 ^ ^1
I A i n, Aur [lbbetson]
KWAJALEINj z K-’Namu [Musquillo] %
' W • Jabwot 0 [Arrowsmith]
. Aihnglapalap
z [Elmore] gj? Arno [Daniel | fc ]
O
. Pingelap i a ! [
CAROLINE ISLANDS [Bonham] Mili [Mulgrave]
Namorik^ Kill- Narik
Kusaie^v [Baring] [Hunter] [Knox Islands]
[Ualan] o too zoo
[Boston] Ebonf® Miles
THE MARSHALL ISLANDS COMPOSE ANOTHER HUGE SECTOR OF THE PACI
lic war theater which now, far from being of any use to their former Jap owners, are a
definite headache for Hirohito. Only four Marshalls remain now in Jap hands—Jaluit,
Mili. Wotje, and Maloelap—and they fit perfectly into General MacArthur’s idea of the
Japs’ "withering on the vine.” During the past few weeks the Army Engineers and the
Navy Seafjpej have built up greater bases on Eniwetok and Kwajalein than the Japs
were able to build in 30 years. Air strips on Kwajalein are probably the bases for recent air
attacks on the faraway Carolines more than 700 miles deeper west in what is still Jap-con
trolled territory. Both Truk and Guam, previously important Jap bases, are now almost
completely untenable due to the American advance into the Marshalls. Truk especially
has been repeatedly bombed with great damage to shore and harbor installations and to
shipping caught in the Truk lagoon.
Church And State Interests
Inseparable In Current War
By Chaplain Glenn S Reddick
Jesus Christ was accused of
two charges at His trial—blas
phemy and treason. Pilate tried
Him on the treason charge. The
Pharisees thought they had Him
for treason over the tax ques
tion. Jesus answered them clev
erly and said “Render unto
Caesar the things that are Cae
sar’s”.
The question of a man s atti
tude towards the State is an old
one. Socrates took the attitude
that a man should obey the State
even if it cost him his life—to
Socrates the laws of the State
was sacred.
Laws are the foundation of the
State. A sovereign State is com
posed of a definite territory, a
definite people and a definite
body of laws. By a law I mean
crystallized public conscience.
A law is not a law merely be
cause it is on a statute book. It
has to be in peoples’ conscience.
(Prohibition, for example, never
was a law.)
Ancient people believed that
the State was divine and its laws
were given to it by the Gods.
The Hebrews thought this. Both
the Hebrews and Greeks thought
that the State was more impor
tant than any member or citizen.
Pythagoras and Democritus
both taught that everyone should
devote himself to the good of
the State. After the Persian
Wars the people of Athens began
to question blind loyalty to the
powers of the State. Individual
ism was in the air. The Sophists
believed in the freedom of the
individual They thought laws
were made by the stronger to
keep the weaker in subjection.
This attitude towards law tended
to make for anarchy.
GOOD CITIZEN
Socrates and Plato and Aris
totle in answer to the Sophists
thought up an adequate philoso
phy of the State. Socrates be
lieved that the good citizen was
one who constantly searched af
ter knowledge He was intensely
loyal to the State. He was will
ing to die because a law court
of Athens had sentenced him to
death To him the State was a
mother who had given him life
and made him what he was. Pla
to thought the State necessary
for the highest development of
the individual. The good man
was the good citizen Laws were
necessary only because some
people refused to cooperate with
the good State. Aristotle thought
the State should enable, each
member to become wholly good.
He believed that a democracy
was a bad form of government.
Monarchy and aristocracy were
good forms.
The Epicureans did not be
lieve that participation in public
life would contribute to the hap
piness of the individual, there
fore a wise man should shun
public office. The Stoics took the
opposite view. They believed
that all have duties and obliga
tions to the State and its laws
are natural laws which we must
all obey whether we like it or
not. A good State was one whose
laws and practices were in har
mony with the good of all man
kind. The Stoics were almost
internationalists in their views.
The Christians put God above
the State. Man should be loyal
to the State only in so far as it
obeyed the laws of God. Some
early thinkers of the Church hes
itated between world denial and
world affirmation. They substi
tuted the Church for the State,
as did for example, Augustine,
in his “City of God”. Earthly
rulers of States may make mis
takes but the ruler of the Church
never made a mistake.
In Mediaeval times the idea
grew up that the King received
his authority from God Author
ity was superior to public opim
ion and the State superior to the
individual. Between the nomi
nalists and realists there were
two views of the State. The Re
alists held the State to be the
only reality and its members
to have no true reality The
Nominalists held man to be the
true reality and the State as
having no existence apart from
its members Aquinas sought to
fuse the thinking of Aristotle
Thursday, May 4, 1944
and Augustine. He believed that
rebellion against government can
never be justified. Changes in
government must come through
legal means, since government
is of divine origin. Aquinas
taught that the Church was su
perior to the State. The State
received its power from the
Church.
IN UNIFORM AGAIN
Anyone who has gone through
a war may question the State. I
myself have done so. For years
after the last world war I ad
mired Eugene V. Debs in his at
titude towards the State. 1 vow
ed that in case of another war I
would oppose it and speak a
gainst it and advise any young
man not to enter it. Now I find
myself in uniform again. Why
the transition?
In the first place, no State can
exist that allows or permits it
self to have its sovereign terri
tory violated or taken from it
by force. Japan has done this
with the Philippines. In the sec
ond place no State has a right to
exist which eliminates Christi
anity and preaches the doctrine
of the Super Man, as Germany
our enemy has done. Honesty
should be the basis upon which
the solid foundation of any State
rests. Both Germany and Japan
have forsaken honesty and sub
stituted lies and deceit for it and
therefore have forfeited the
right to exist Among civilized
people No State has a right to
block the economic progress of
its citizens or the economic prog
ress of mankind. Germany and
Japan by reverting to State Cap
italism have forfeited all rights
to exist, because they hold mil
lions in economic slavery for the
sake of a favored few of their
citizens
PEACE TO MANKIND
If I had to choose between the
Church and the State I would
rather obey the Church. In this
present conflict the interests of
the Church on the side of the
Allies are so bound up together
that we cannot separate them
We live in a world of force be-
(Continued on Page 5)