The Southern Israelite. (Augusta, Ga.) 1925-1986, March 01, 1929, Image 8
The Southern Israelite
t)w
Executive Offices: 161 Spring St., N. W.
Published In Atlanta Monthly by
THE SOUTHERN NEWSPAPERS ENTERPRISES, Inc.,
M. STEPHEN SCHIFFER, Managing Editor
Subscription Rates: 15 Cents Single Copy, $1.50 Per Year In Advance.
Entered as second class matter at the Postoffice at Atlanta, Ga.,
under the Act of March 3rd, 1879.
All communications for publication should reach this office not later than
1st and 15th of each month.
The Southern Israelite Invites correspondence and literary contributions, but
the Editor is not to be considered as sharing the views expressed by the
writers except those enunciated in the Editorial columns.
minds. If the Bible were written in present day prose form i n
modern English, then there would be no need for comment. The
passages would read like the exciting adventures of the Arabian
Nights, and the children would really derive meaning from what
is read to them. But the Bible is, naturally, not written in modern
style, and the immature minds of children in school are not capable
of grasping the meaning of Biblical passages which are read off
to them without comment and without interpretation. To read the
Bible without comment to the children of the public schools i s to
waste time which could be used to some good advantage in other
fields.
Conversion and the Jews
Missionaries activities against the Jews in America have be
come more pronounced in recent years than ever before. An effort
to stop these activities was made within the past few weeks by a
sincere rabbi of New York, but his efforts were fruitless.
Dr. Israel Goldstein appeared before the Home Mission Coun
cil of the Presbyterian church at their annual conference in
Atlantic City and urged, in behalf of peace, fair play, American
freedom and interdenominational good-will, that all missionary
propaganda to alienate Jews from the faith of their fathers be
stopped. The Christian leaders lent their ears to Dr. Goldstein’s
plea, but rejected the insinuation that they were trying to convert
Jewish children without the consent of their parents, denied the
charge that they sought converts through baits and bribes, repu
diated the idea that they were antagonistic to religious freedom in
American life.
Dr. Goldstein no doubt meant well, but it was a mistake to
urge Christian leaders to desist from one of the most fundamental
duties of the Christian church. The only way to prevent conver
sion among the Jews is to arouse in the Jewish people the con
sciousness of a glorious past, a wonderful present and a greater
future for our religion. The Jewish people must have before them
a clear impression of the beauty and serviceableness of their re
ligion, so that no other creed, no matter how attractive, can tempt
them away from Judaism.
When we beg Christians to desist from missionary activities,
we are confessing our own weaknesses and fears, thus giving them
cause to redouble their energies and reorganize their campaigns
to bring about the greatest measure of success in converting our
people. The number of people who are actually converted to the
Christian religion is indeed small, so there is no reason for us
to make a confession that will display weakness on our part.
Only the ignorant Jews, without courage and without truth,
are the ones who can be swerved from the Jewish religion, and
it is because of them that wide publicity should be given to the
missionary activities that are carried on by the Christian sects.
When our people are well informed on Jewish religious principles
and thoroughly disciplined in habits of self-control, kindness and
morality, we have nothing to fear from missionaries, even though
they have huge sums of money at their command and an organiza
tion that is mechanically perfect.
We will not criticize the honest missionaries for their effort
to convert us, for their effort is sincere, and they believe that it is
the command of their Savior to win all the people of the earth to
their religion. However, we shall resist their efforts, for the Jew
ish spirit has endured for thousands of years, and we believe that
the Jewish heritage will be carried on through the generations
to come.
Current Philanthropy
America is a land in which the wealthy seem to acquire a
spirit of responsibility for the proper distribution of their funds
Bequests, donations, foundations are events of daily occurrence and
the value of the type of citizen which they represent is often lost
sight of in their frequency.
We have witnessed at least three cases of this kind. Largest
in amount is the gift of $1,000,000 by former Congressman Lucius
M. Littauer, of Gloversville, N. Y. The purposes of this are
research in cancer and pneumonia, promotion of Jewish communal
activities and studies in Hebrew, the welfare of mankind and
better understanding. This is not the first of Mr. Littauer’s bene
factions. They have been numerous and for both scientific and
social purposes.
In Pittsburgh, Mr. A. C. Lehman has given the Carnegie
Institute the wherewithal to award a prize of a maximum of
$12,000 for the best painting at its annual exhibition. This is said
to be the largest sum ever offered in the art world. It consists of
a prize of $2,000 and a maximum purchase price of $10,000 for
the painting selected.
A former Philadelphian, Dr. Frank Alfred Golder, professor
of history in Stanford University until his recent death, has
bequeathed his entire estate to a trust fund for the orphan children
of college professors. Dr. Golder was an outstanding authority on
Russian history and the Russian people. He had also been asso
ciated with President*. • Herbert Hoover in relief work during
and after the World War.
In viewing these three gifts, perhaps the fact that will strike
the reader as most obvious is that they were given by Jews. This
is very gratifying. It must not, however, be forgotten that what
credit is due, is due to the person making the gift and that none
of his co-religionists have any sanction for personal pride, unless
they, themselves, have been worthy to a proportionate degree.
There is this to be said, however. Every general law is composed
of a large number of detailed occurrences. The greater the num
ber of individual Jews who are of benefit to the world, the more
the world will find that it lacks justification for intolerance or
prejudice.—Rochester Jewish Ledger.
Benjamin Spigel
From time to time a community is
called upon to face the loss of one or
more of its respected citizens. There
is a period of heartache and general
mourning, and for a while the loss is
keenly felt. But time, the great heal
er, gradually assuages the intensity
of the loss; the threads of communal
life are slowly wrought together at
the point where they were severed,
and others learn to perform the com
munal tasks which the departed had
been wont to perform.
the heart. He was, indeed, a lay-
minister whose heart and hearth were
ever open for the needy, and now
that he is gone, many will be com
pelled to harbor their inner sorrows
without help from him and to solve
their problems without the broad vi
sion that came from him. They can
go to no one else—truly, his place
can not be filled.
Benjamin Spigel was not only Nor
folk’s finest Jew and citizen; he was
Compulsory Bible Reading
We fail to see what possible benefit can be derived from
compulsory Bible reading in the public schools. Georgia already
has a law demanding this, as well as have the majority of states
in this part of the country. For what purpose? Supposedly to ac
quaint the public school children with the Book of Books. It is a
part of the Georgia law that this reading is to be done without
comment. That is where the hitch comes in. If certain passages
of the Bible could be read with comment, then perhaps the children
would gain an understanding of the Book which underlies all
religions, and the law would then be worthwhile. But the law
emphatically states: “without comment”. This means that several
times a week children must sit at their desks in the schoolroom
and listen to reading matter that registers absolutely nil to their
But in the loss of Benjamin Spigel,
of Norfolk, whose sudden demise
plunged our whole community into
profound grief, there is something ir
reparable. His going has produced a
void which can not be filled, and the
passage of time, far from bringing
forgetfulness, will make us realize all
the more that his place can not be
taken by any other citizen of Nor
folk. To him came the orphan and
the widow, the sorrowful and the op
pressed, the ill and the troubled, for
aid in their perplexing problems. To
him came Jew and Gentile, big and
little, for the sort of help that comes
not only from the purse but also from
man what the rainbow is to the cloud-
filled sky. He was an ambassador of
hope and an apostle of human love.
He lived Hillel’s Golden Rule in the
truest sense of the word. Born in
December 1878, his too-brief life was
dedicated to the welfare of his fellow-
man. His acts of service are too nu
merous to detail, and though he wa*
affiliated with a score of fraternal
and civic orders, it may be said ol
Benjamin Spigel that he fitted in best
with that broader order whose consti
tution is the love of God and whose
purpose is the service of man.
—Rabbi Alex. Alan Steinbach,
Beth El Temple, Norfolk, Va.