Newspaper Page Text
PAGE SIX
■ Issued Every Thursday.
Office of Publication: THOMSON, GA.
SUBSCRIPTION PRICE.. SI.OO Per Year«
Advertising Rates Furnished on Application.
Entered as second-class matter, Dec. 8, 1910,
at the post office at Thomson, Georgia,
under the Act of March 3, 1879.
Hl w y IS tlie a *’ ove date appears on
gfo vs t^lc a^ ou y° ur paper it
eJ means that your subscrip-
tion expires this month. Subscriptions are dis
continued promptly on date of expiration.
RENEW NOW.
Thomson, Ga., May 28, 1914.
An Ex-Nun Arrested, Just As
Watson Was, For Quoting
From a Roman Cath
olic “Saint.”
. (continued from rage one.)
POPERY CANNOT AFFORD TO BE
EXPOSED.
No American Catholic would be a papist,
if ho knew what popery is.
THE ITALIANS KNO W THIS!
hi prosecuting Watson and Anna Lowry,
the object is, not only to prevent the Protest
ants from learning the hidden depravities of
popery, BUT TO KEEP THE AMERICAN
CATHOLICS FROM FINDING IT OUT!
The infamous traitors, the Knights of
'Columbus, prosecuted Miss Anna Lowry.
The lawyer whom these traitors hired to
prosecute the ex-nun had the impudence to
(demand that the trial judge should not
impose a fine, but should put her behind the
bars.
, iWhy?
BECAUSE, IF SHE WERE PUT IN
MAIL, THEY COULD SCARE HER INTO
KEEPING HER MOUTH SHUT, OR
THEY COULD KILL HER!
What was the ex-Nun, Anna Lowry accused
t)f ?
She was charged with using obscene
language, in that she read to her audience
Certain parts of Saint Liguori’s teachings.
Those obscene teachings have been officially
approved by Pope Pius IX. and Leo XIII.—
both of whom were contemporaries and per
sonal friends of Cardinal Gibbons.
The trial judge actually fined that woman
js3s for reading page 275 of Vol. 6, of Liguo
ri’s book—a book which the Italian popes
endorse, the Romish seminaries teach, and
the Roman priests use.
The very language which Miss Lowry was
fined for reading, is spoken by the Catholic
priests to American on aids and wives in the
secrecy of the Confessional.
Miss Lowry has appealed the case.
What do you think is ahead of us when
these Powers-that-be are lending their aid to
the Italian priests, to prevent our people from
learning THE HIDEOUS SECRETS OF
POPERY?
‘No other religion has to prosecute people
for reading out of its text-books.
Think of that.
No other church has hidden doctrines and
approved practices, which it dares not allow
husbands, fathers, sons and brothers Itnow
about.
THINK OF THAT.
No other church would prosecute me, or
you, for publishing an extract from its official
teachings.
Think of it—for God’s sake, think!
♦ ■■■
Read “Life and Times of Andrew Jack
son,” by Thos. E. Watson. Beautifully
printed. Illustrated. Paper, $1.00; cloth,
$1.50. Jeffersonian Pub. Co., Thomson, Ga«
THE JEFFERSONIAN
I Did Not Vote For Woodrow
Wilson, and I’m Glad of It.
VW ILLI AM JINGLE BALDY says that
your uncle T. E. W. voted against Wood
row Wilson. Well, what of it?
Isn’t this a free country, and isn’t T. E. W.
one of the “we?”
The dishonest manner •in which an
instructed Clark delegate betrayed his trust
and knifed his own candidate, by telling lies
on him, in his absence, and thus defeating the
will of the people and of a decided majority
of the delegates, was sufficient in itself to
release the anti-Wilson men from the implied
obligation to vote for him.
In law and in equity, a title that is tainted
with fraud, is null and void; and a nomina
tion to office which claims the loyal allegiance
of voters, is subjected to the same principle
Nominations obtained by fraud, by false
promises, by the use of money and whiskey,
or by any other dishonest practices, are as
void as contracts, notes, motgages and deeds
are, under the same circumstances.
Because the Hog-eye man, who appointed
himself to the Senate, got a second guberna
torial nomination by the use of money and
false pretenses; and then used his success to
choke free speech in a Democratic Conven
tion, so that he could again stab the county
unit plan, I refused to support him for Gov
ernor.
Because falsehood, bribery and whiskey
were used in the Tenth District, to keep in
Congress an utterly worthless Representative,
I declined to vote for that Representative—•
who is the asidious ape of Senator Hog-it-all
Smith.
And because Solicitor-General, Joseph Rey
nolds refused to make use of the legal and
sufficient evidence placed before him, that
money and whiskey had been unlawfully used
by that Congressman, I am against the said
Reynolds in his race to succeed the said Con
gressman—-especially as he, the said Reynolds,
is the candidate of the said Congressman, and
of Dan Fogarty, and the other Knights of
Columbus of Augusta, Georgia.
Everything that I can do to prevent the
Romanists from deceiving our people into vot
ing for candidates who are secretly allied to
popery, I consider a duty.
We are right up against that issue, and we
must draw the line.
Those that are afraid to speak out against
the foreign oligarchy of Italian cardinals w T ho
want to rule our country, abolish our public
schools, penalize free speech and free press,
and use the mask of “religion” to assassinate
our liberties, are not the men who can train
with loyal Americans.
Let those candidates who truckle, to the
priests, look to the priests to elect them.
Did not William J. Bryan afterwards
admit that he had never intended to impugn
the honor of Champ Clark?
Did not the old war-horse of Democracy
lose the nomination at Baltimore, on account
of Bryan’s malicious and unfounded attack?
IP«s not Bryan the instructed Clark dele
gate from Nebraska, honor-bound to use all
legitimate means to secure Clark’s nomina
tion ?
Did he ever give Clark any notice of his
intended attack?
Did he cry, “On guard!” to Clark, before
he ran the poisoned knife into him?
Could Champ Clark suspect that the fatal
stab would come from an instructed Clark
delegate ?
There never was a blacker case of pre
meditated perfidy, than that of Bryan at
Baltimore.
Bryan accused Clark of a sell-out to Wall
Street. That accusation hurled into an
excited mob of delegates, with nobody pre
pared to reply to it, gave the nomination to
Wilson and- the Roman Catholics, aftet
Champ Clark had received a decided
majority, again and again.
WHAT HAVE WILSON AND BRYAN
DONE FOR WALL STREET AND THE
POPE?
(1.) They legalized the Money Trust, giv
ing it Government currency free of cost, and
perpetuating its power to make monopolies,
crush competition, check enterprise, and con
trol production.
Under the new National Bank system, the
non-producers will rob the producers of every
bit of their surplus.
Wilson and Bryan have done for Special
Privilege what the Republicans under Taft
could not do.
(2.) ( They have given the manufacturing
Trusts a tariff bill that is worse than the
McKinley bill, and as bad as the Dingley bill
-—a law which neither lowers the cost of liv
ing to the masses, nor lessens the inquitous
profits of the sheep-shearing classes.
Th& Farmers’ Free-list bill, which Taft
vetoed was never revived after the election of
Wilson. :
During the campaign, the Free-list bill
which the Republicans had opposed and
killed, was used to win votes for the .Demo
cratic ticket. Under that bill, everything that
the farmer has to buy for the making of his
crops, was exempted from tariff duties.
Therefore the law would have reduced the
farmer’s expenses by at least one-third.
But under the law which the Democrats
passed, after the election, not a single dollar’s
expense has been saved to the man who tills
the soil.
Am I ashamed that I voted against a man
and a set of men who deceived the
masses, in that manner?
No, I’m not! I knew that a candidate
whose nfimination had to be won by deliber
ate fraud and subterfuge could not possibly
give the people an Administration free from
the designs of the Money Trust and Manu
facturing Trust.
(3.) Where is the Rural Credit system
that was to give the people cheap money?
Didn’t the Baltimore platform pledge Wil
son and Bryan to a financial system which
would lighten the load of the agriculturing
classes who have to borrow ?
It “shore” did.
Wasn’t an expensive Commission sent
to Europe, to study the practical workings of
Rural Credits?
It “shore” was.
European farmers have had the benefit of
4 per cent loans for 50 years; and with that
low-priced money they run the farms that
compete with ours.
Didn’t President Wilson declare, last year,
that he would give us a Rural Credit system,
this year?
He “shore” did. . i [' *
Has he done it? NO. >■
Has he tided to do it? NO.
On the contrary, he has fought it, AND
KILLEDIT!
He says that the farmer cannot have relief
“at this time.”
My God! Is the time ever to come, when
the farmer will cease to be made the yellow
dog of Federal legislation?
The Wall Street money-kings have got
what they want: the Manufacturing Trusts
have got what they want: the- expenses of the
Government have .been so prodigiously
advanced that the office-holders have almost
got what they want: the Army and Navy have
been so enormously increased in power and
in number, that the Military Jingoes have
well-nigh got what they want: but as for the
tillers of the soil, the workers in the mine and
mill and field and shop—nothing can be done
for them, “at this time.”
1 alk about ostracising me for not voting
.with a lot of debauched politicians whose offi*
