Southern recorder. (Milledgeville, Ga.) 1820-1872, November 21, 1820, Image 1

Below is the OCR text representation for this newspapers page.

HHBH VOL. I. MILLEDGEVILLE, TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 21, 1020. No» 41. PUBLISHED WEEKLY, (on Tuesdays) BY S. QRANTL.1ND if 11 M. ORME, at three dollars, in advance, on four DOLLARS AT THE EXPIRATION OF THE YEAR. (HT Advertisements conspicuously inserted nt the customary rates. FORTUNATE DRAWERS IN THE LAND LOTTERY, From tlir Ihtft to the 21s/, and part of the 2 3d nil. contained in sheet .Vo. 12. APPLING. Moses Vick, Rennet Abbet, James Smith. Baldwin. Daniel Hammond, Benj. Leonard, Sa muel Johnson, Sam’l Buffington, R. Ry an’s orps. ; Tho’a Branham, T. Young’s orps. ; Wm Reid, John Pitts, J. A. Per due, J. Lucas, Sarah Peters, J, Hamits' orps.; J. Collins, J. Maclin, Willis Per ry, Wm D. Tavlor. BULLOCH. E. Petty, Wm Miller, J. Jones, I. Elc- bv’s orphans, J. Lane’s orphans, Jesse Odom's orphans, I. Lcevens, Wm Shuf fle Id, jr. BURKE. Moses Cox, T. Bostick, L. Collins, Mary Madey, A. H. Anderson, Nancy Farmer, Green, Wm and Geo. Goodbce, orps.; M. M'Clammv’s orps. ; C. White, A. Carter, Wm Wiggins, D. Barnes, J. Greene, Wm C. Norris, R. Palmer, E. Johnson, Wm Gordon, Kembrel’s orps.; S. Sancer, orp. E. Drake, M. Goodwin Wm Hester, D. & M. Clemons, orphnhs D. Wooten, E. Beall, Martha, Amanda and Caroline Bostick, orphans ; Eliz. A Sapp, B. Mathews, Wm Churchwell, O Tomlin, J. Floyd. J. Cravev, Enn’s orps BRYAN. S. Harvey, J. R. Maxwell, J. J. Max well, Louisa & J. Thompson, orphan CAMDEN. J. Worlley, C. Atkinson, orp. ; Eave Wright, widow, Levice Btfrco, orphan Z. Burnett, orp. ; S. Osteen, A. Harrald F, Slade, E. Perry, J. McClain, G. M Blount, C. Raine. CHATHAM. C. H. Camlield, J. Falun, P. Young J. M’Henry, J. Maxwell, J. Roa, P. Rox W. Wright, Wm Richardson, Mary Cant boll, Washington & Wm Hcwlct, orps. J. Grayson, R. Habersham, William P Clarke, Ann Lawson, widow, Ann Now land, Wm Long, J. D. Cale, J. H. Cun ningham, widow, T. D. Porter, P. Killer J. M. Zipperu, G. Gordon, Wm Morel P. J. Yoloton, N. Hunt, G. Lewis, Eliza Bolinger,orp. J. Griffin, T. H. Williams CLARKE. J. Oates, B. J. Pringle, S. Elder, G B. Jacks, E. Ward, B. Ward, D. Craft, sen. G. Spinks, E. Hardgree, wid. Tho's Wade, II. Hunton, wid.; G. Fenn, sn. J. Williams, J. Flint, Wm Roberts, J. Bris coe, orp. J. Smith, J. Hunton, B. Simms. COLUMBIA. Wm B. Luke, J. Wright, A. G. S. L. Zabrey.J. B. Brown, orphan, R. Davey, M. Whittenton, widow, R. Lacctcr, J. Farrar, H. Sexton, W. Jennigs, J. Winn, VV r m West, Joel Crawford, Wm Young, P. Perkins, A. Daniel, A. Tinsley, Wm Cox, B. R. Jones, S. Crawford, D. L. Marshall, D. Adams, R. II. Berry, A. Foster, R. Averitt’s orphans, Wtn ilar- tup, Wm Richardson. EARLY. Isaac Ledbetter. EFFINGHAM. J. Anderson, II. White, 11. Berry, W. Wamack, seu. C. Gnann, orphan, Sarah Cook, J. Lineburgor, B. Grey, G. J. Zi- tromer. ELBERT. Mary Lawson, J. Webb, T. Horton, jr. D. Kerlin, J. Hansard, M. Bryant, Jas Wright, Wm Dye, J. Martin, A. Henry, J. Ballinger, sr. E. Hendrix, II. Crump, W. Myatt, J. Bragg, E. Rowscy, sr. E. Thornton, Jas Banks, sr. J. Daniel, P. « Butler,jr. Ann Allman, w idow, D» Banks, Asa Dobbs. Wm Mill, \Ym C. Terrell, J. Dobbs, T. S. Carter, Win Thornton, J. Penn, jr. R, Smith, R. Hall, I. White. S Childs, Y. Dickerson, R. B. Christian, T. Moore, E. Ginn, C. Oliver, J. Gor don, J. Middleton, N. M’Mullin, S. Jones. Martha Head, EMANUEL. F. Palmer, J. Snell, Wm Wcelcr, A. White, A. Smith, A. S. Lane, J.Kdlam. FRANKLIN. C. Rucker, widow, G. Huggins, Jacob Hearn, Richard Millen,E. Ilenslee, Job G. Hay, J. Murdock, G. Stovall, Robert Brown, J. Westbrook, jr. T. P. Bur roughs J. Burton, Wm Nicks, C. Baker, J. Evans, sr. G. Carrel, C. H. Burton, A. Down, F. Smith’s orphans, M. Fagaus, sen. A. Lankford, E. Swann, sen. E. Wa ters, jr. S. Halebrooks, S. Chandler, A Glass, orphan, A. Blackwell, H. Smith S. Chaneler, M. Turmon. B. Baker, J Nelson, J. Brvant, sen. J. Lee, jr. Wm Johnson, sr. J.’D. Parker, G. W. Jones J. Johnson, Wm Bush, E. Bratlctt. jr. N R. Dorch, R. Pulliams, jr. M. Sewell William Saryer. GLYNN. Wm Dyer, Job Tyson, M. Palmer. UREENE. D. Paiillu's orphans, T. Cheatham, Crawford, J. Freeman, D. Jett, Wm 11. Phynaes, E. Bradshaw, C. Liadsey, Wm Greer, James Akins, P. H. Greene, R. I liornton, Wm B. liurralson, J, Brook- cr, J. Stephenson, A. Barnett, T. B. Garrell, M. Cridell’s orphans, J. Sayres, J. M. Carter, Ann A. Early, O. Jaiinson, W. W. Greer, Win Pryon, J. Hendrick, Jas Anderson, Jas Stewart, A. Loving#, II. O’Neal, Jas Fetwell,’ Tho’s Greer, B. Reynolds, J. Shaw, A. Foster; D. Z. Hughes, Jas Lyme, C. Nelms, M. Sim mons, Tho's Merritt, Amrc Pcevy, G. Mitchell. GWINNETT. R. Johnson, D. Wester, J. James, S. Strickland, John Clark, Fr’s Winn, sen. HANCOCK. Allen Jones, Henry Graybill, Jas Car ter, L. Mapp, Mason Hnrvill's orphans, John Bartlett, Wm G. Waller, llenry Lvcas, Mark Condea, Wm Brown, John Mann, Martin L. Hill, B. Bass.G. Moore, Tho’s Pritchett, Eli Hart. A. F. Smith, Rob'l Pettegrew, Charles Ennis George Butt's orphans, Arthur, Foot's orphans, John Thornton. B. Waller's orphans, R. l’emplin, Jos Chappell’s orphans, John Leak, Henry Tray wick, Benj Blow, Ann Tray wick, Tiro’s C. Butts, J. Cain, Lee Griggs, [sham Coleman, Ch’s Aber crombie, sen. HABERSHAM. Stephen Griffiths, John Morton. HALL. Armstead Husley, John M’Connell, jr Wm Holcomb, L. M. Eliot, John String er, jr. M. Hulsey, John Pilkington, Jas Gailey, George Barnwell, Joel Hulsoy. JACKSON. Joseph Kurbon, John Smith, jr. Tho's Reeves, jr. James Young, jr. Shadrnch Greene, Rob’t Boring, John L. Hamil ton, Win Kennedy, John H^Jrbs, Rich'd Ellison, Ann H. Martin, widow, Thomas Conner, Joseph Baggy, G. Griggs’ orps Levi Akridge, Sain’l Hanson, J. Brazel- ton, sen. Wm Laughlin, Jesse Horn, Jas Anglin, Jos W’iglev, sen. Hiram Perry, Stephen Key, John Thomas, A. Boyd, Moses 11. Potls, Rob’t Boyle, Ch’s Mar tin, J. Doster, John Benton, Jas Calle- han, Sam’l Henderson, 11. J. Watts, W. Perry, John Waits, jr. E. M’ConnelL Wm Rnkestraw, Sain’l Burnes, Samuel Christian's orphans, John Borders, sen. Greene Williams, Ira Bell, Jas J. Wil son, Jas R. Lnwrey, John Kirk, Ilosca Camp, Jas Smith, David Bradford, John Sea, Jas Farmer, sen. Jacob Beds, B. M’Daniel’s orphans, John M'Vav, sen’r, Moses Mathews, John Madcaif, Archibald Nichols. David Smith, sr. John Cook, Ralph M’Rees, C. M'Kinncy, sr. M. T. Hamilton, Tho's Williams, sr. JASPER. Agnes# Craig, Jonas Holland, Jesse A. Gill, Tho’s Gaston, Young Thornton. J. Higginbotham, Jos Waller, L. C. Hol land, Abram Waldrobe, Jas Pearson, D Phillips, Wm B. Pennington, John Hob son, Rob’t Seymore, Abdon Alexander, Robert Porter, John Cardin, M. Stanley, Hardy Jones, Larkin Turner. James E. Bankston, L. Worthy, Rob’t Sturdivant, P. White, Jas Hodge, sr. Jos Black, Jas P. Sharpe, 0. Wilkinson, Wm S. Bond, John Keith, Wm Buttrill, Cli's Kitchens, lienry- Maulden, J. Lumsden,jr. Robert West, Wm Hearn, sr. Jas Marcrnm, J. M’Clure, John Coots, Wm Coggiti, A. Evans, Hailey Baker, Wm Ragland, J. Campbell, Henry Smith’s orphans, Elias Jones, John Chapman, Rice l’. Knowles, Edw'd Castleberry, Henry Overton, T. Bullard, A. Smith, sr. Win Gay, John Compton, sr. John R. Eadv, George II. Monk, Jas Back, J. C. Jordan, J Lazen- by r , J. W. Crenshaw, Mark House, Han nah Thompson, Pollv Harrel, Jas Patton, Jas Marcrnm, C. Hobson, Tho's Robin son, Harris Cross, Burtin Martin, Joseph Betts, John Bean, John Traylor, Tho’s Lawrence, Rich’d Edmusdon, Ab’m B. Dale, Wm M’Dowell, sr. Tho’s Gav, J. M’Clendon, John llooton. John Ham, jr. John A. Goolsby, R. Robertson, A. How ard. E. Mobley, J. G. W. Brown, G. Lewis, John S. Gibson, Wm Hammock, Rich'd Head, O. II. Kenan, Wm II. Kim hrough, John G. Towns, D. Millner, W. Jackson. JONES. James Farley, Thomas Curuthcrs esse Ros«, Jas Smith, A. Coursey, sen WyntC. Williamson, John Lewis’ orphs M. Whcelis. James R. Davis, Peter San ders, Wm Trice, D. Beasley, J. Long L. Williamson, Agnes Dark, Jas Picket Benj. B. Lamar, Win Grumble, A. Ho bertson, Allen Hudson, II. Hobson’s or phnns, Harris Horn, James King, J. W Jarvis. Burton Crnbb, Peter Northern John English. WmChambless, I). Jam s, Sam’l Smith's jr. orphans, J. Newby, jr. B. Hawkins’ orphans, Tho’s King, Rob t Caruthers, Wm Ballard, John Pittman, Jas B. Smith, R. Reynolds, Lewis Wynn, J. Whatley, sr. B. Stripling, sr. R. M’- Gee, S. Goslin’s orphans. A. Coursey, jr. Elias S. Wright, Allen Hodge, J. Hay- man, Lewis Wimberly, Jas Turner, E. Sliarley, Silas Monk, P. Williams, wid.; A. Rice, T. M. Gough, Wtn Holstead, S. Cooke, widow, R. Adams, M. Brooks, Fields Lewis, Tho's Davis, John Dunn, Tho’s JollitL E. Harris, S. Brown. Phe- by Thomas, widow, Henry J. Goodwin, Jas Gordon ley, E. Hawkins, John Br< JEFFERSON. James Hogan, John G. Bostick, A. Crns- Rell, J. A. Hudson. More Foreman, H. Gil more, Jolm Powell, John M'N'eely, Win Ab bot, sen. li. Mnrphey, G. Turner’s orphans, John M’Gill, Joel Dorsey, J. Bostick, wid.; Wen Harper, J. Hatcher’s orphans, S. Jones, J. Cheatham, Rob’t Garvin, J. Yarborough, E. Herod, J. B. Terrell, A. Mathews, jr. W. Webb, J D R Figg, S Perkins, widow ; J Jordan, J Three wit’s orphans, C Mathews, A Campbell, S Paulk, A R Cheatham, Jas Jackson, Wm Grimes, J Fleming, D Wood, R Martin, J M’Cullough, MMarshall, J La nier, J Lanier, T Powell, Win Cook. LAURENS. B. Spurlock, D Smith, Mary So Anti Horn, orphans ; J Turner, N Johnson, E J Jackson, J Howard, N Swilley, I Smith, H Smith W Flowers, J Stanley, J Turner, J Row- anil, sen. S Hickman, H Montford, W A J M Sailer, Wm Rye, W Royals, S Kirkland, A Bnncle, J B Spivey, II Sharp, J Faircloth, B Brantley, J Dominy, orn.; W Benson, 1) Faircloth, I) M’Daniel, W Wood, II Averelt, D F.vans, sen. M Carey, D Stephens, N Pic kering, J Johnson. LIBERTY. J E Fraser, P Wiggiith, S Barber, J Nor man, .1 Coker, J Daniel, J Maulden, 11Ham mons, C Hodges, widow ; T Shepherd s or phans, Wm Osteen, J C Broughton, John Pupham. LINCOLN. Eli Baniet, J Sudduth, S Haws, B Sto vall, jr. A Levcrett, J Swords, D, Covington ,1 Smith, J Fowler, V Wethers, J Jaeo, J B Turner, J Cook’s orphans, T Farrar, Wm IPs orphans, Wm Elliott, M Levritf, Tho’s Elliott, J Waller, .1 Lockhart, T Holliday, T W Traniil, Wm D Jones, J Woodard, I. Turner. MADISON. II Williford, C Polk, G Reid’s orphans. £ Groves, A Cox, J Hail, J V Williford, Elisha Ware, J Burton, L Lan,J Ru&el, J Alexan der, M NeAburn, A Upshaw, II Seegroves, MANTOSI1. A M ‘Ivcr, .T flunwoody, M Hathorp, Eli- 7,i, Marian, John U. Caroline Brown, orphs D Fox, R Middleton, <B Rolua-k, M M’Do- nahl, widow, N Pearson, widow, J Oliver Ann Bradford, widow, J Powers. J UAhorn II Harford. .MONTGOMERY. N Clark, L Gilley, D Davis, jr. D Shaw, Win King, N Griffiu. MORGAN. U Feilder, Wm-Corley's orphans, SI Hutchinson, R Davis’ orphans, T Allen, J Fuller, R Davids on, E Ford, R Copeland J Bojvgs, M Edrtlemon, A Greathfhise, Wm Chancy, J Barkley, 7. Templeton, C C Mills, 8 A Greer, T Duke, E G Berry, N Hackney J Evans, Win Allen, II Gibbs, A BM'Guin Wm Collingsworth, J M'Nahli, G Langford T Maddin, J Chwthren, G Cryer, I Hendon .1 Stib', J Wakefield, B C Anderson's orphs D G Hardwick, J Morrow, LT Wellborn S Merritt, M Brown, J Baul. J Burney, M Harris, J Burtoil, 8 Black, R Smith,.I Herd N Griffin, E White, R A tin of, S Adcock, H Philips, J Chancy, J Sparks, J Nealy, T B Watson, N L Williams. OGLETHORPE. Ishaui Chcctani, M Hudson, G Vickers, II Sneed, Aon Ray, J Glenn, sen. B Stamps, E Zubcr, II Hill, N Edwards, V Atkinson It Ayeoek, A Kilmorp, T Stewart, I Mnldc Wtn Pittard, R Carter, J West, N Bnriitn .1 Wright., It Ham, C J, Mathews, Wm Gn sham, A Moody, 11 Tribble, M Waters, l Patrick, L Brockman, J I. Richardson, 1 Cooper, .1 Ayeoek, Wm Ellis, sen. S Jolm son, A Tumble. S English, E Gnsderi, 11 IM’KIerny’s orphans, J II ,Merritt, C Taylor, T Serriggin, sen. B Woodruff, W 'Gosden, Win Pye, C V Callier, D Langston, IfTye, Smith, Wm Dillard, A Lester, William Campbell, sen. T.I Stamps, E Price. PUTN. 1M. R Wright, R Iverson’s orphs. D D Fcips’ orphans, T Giles, F Williams. I) L Laurens, T Clark, jr. Wm Ottsley, It Hill, .1 A Cog- hurn, E llill.D M‘Kay, J Maddox, Wm Bos- , Win Wilkinson, At m Lutkey,sen. Wm inters, II Bird, Wm Walker, sen. T Jones, 1 11 Dawson, IVm Worthy, Win G Bryant. Wm Album, R Finch. B Shepard, .1 Brooks, N G Slaughter, L Lindt, J Jloss,jr.D Whit J Greene, 1) Weaver,.I M’Kessack, S Wil iams, J Foreman, A Ward, M Spivey, Win Robinson, J It Howell, ,1 Love, A (l Hall, widow; A Griggs G King, G Allen, E F.vans, Win Holiday, J Lake, 8 Woolscy, C Heath PULASKI. I Scarbrough, B Bradlv, E. Page, orp. F Johsoo, J 9 Ivey, Win Garbetf, E Herring J Pratt, H King, J O Kelly, B F.idson, A James, D M'Nair, R Gnlitely, M Holland C Lanear’s orphans, C Sevhcrt, I Blount, H llolleyman, M Wilson,L. Love, \ Johnston A Moore, J Lee, jr. T Wcllon, 11 Dees’ orps, RICHMOND. E Quin. JAnsly, C Grant ilic, J Collin Wm Watkins, orp. Orasha, Alford, fc Joiin Ponge, orphans : R Cone, J Lyon, A Cain M Stephens, Blanford, Joseph, Am Sc Mahe Burch, orphans ; C Wilson, J Boyd, N Mu pliey, M Kelley, Lucinda fc M Adams, orp E Birch, orp, Wm C Ware,' Win iVI'Kean, 8 Smith, wid. J M'Manas, N Burkes, Sam’l S Starnes, J L Oliver, J A Rhodes, T Ma tin', s, S Gofl', A Tardy, jr. G Foster. SC R IVEN. S Lee, orp. G W Best, J M Wade, C Par mer, E Wilder, J Gamble, .1 Pearson, F. Robins, J B Shephard, It Fain-loth, J H Wade, J Emanuel, Wm Smith, D Berke, It Phillips, E Gipson. TATTNALL. N Bead, P Kemp, .1 M Tippins, A Lord, Win Conyers, A M‘C|el;tnd, II Cullen’s or phans, II Powell, 8 Crews, widow ; B Mims, A Baxley, J Strickland, M Hardin. TELFAIR. D Campbell. C Ramey, J Reid’s orphans. C J Shelton, M Gibson. TWIGGS. S Farris, M Walker, N Darby, T Spaul ding, W Mickler, jr. T Smith, M Pitts. W Cornelius, widow ; MeKinny Miiton, A Eth ridge, J Griffin, E Wimberly, jr. J Wells, T Wynne, C Bradshaw, T H Duffel, Wm Mar tin, Wm Dye, J Clark, J C Hammock, John Jones, It Angily, J Strickland, H Solomon, It Adkins, B Roberson's orps. J Jessop, ti Womack, II Linton, J Thomas, Wm Wilson, J G Slappy. WALTON. J Bryan, jr. D Ray, G Choppel. E Hill, S Morris, T Duke, It Hampton. WARREN. J Grnnade, R Mitchell, J Bailey. M Dra per, wid. J Gristin, I Sanford, It Rees, J S Waggoner, M Jenkins, P Mays, wid. S Gees- lin, ;r. A Ausley, Wm M'Nease, J W Stan ford, /Tin Clark’s orphans, J Beall's orphans, J Gray, Wm J Cooper, S Scott, Wm Mc- Nealse, J Daniel, II Neal. IP. 1SIIINGTON. J //.inly, // Mobley, J Amerson, sen. J Jordan, sen. J Brown, TN M’Williams, Asa Garret, .1 //ndges, M Garner, W //nod, sen. E Wort ban, sen. L Jenkins, B W hite, J Law- nco. L Jenkins, L //orton. E Merry, M Clvtsteen, Wm Lenier, B Jordan, Win Li- num, J Acrage, 'Wm Rogers, L Collins, R Motley, Sen. J Rnhinsni,, R Tompkins, N Renfroe, J Brnhnun,E Fnrlis’ovps. Willliam //icklaiid, F Jackson, S Howard, SR Vick- rs, S Anderson, WAYNE. Philip Giger, Frederick Bryan. WILKES. 8 Reynolds, J Ogle tree, J Williams, T Mmicreef, A Sheats, A //arris, M Talbot, jr. L It Montford, Wm Berry, F Fret man, M Ganawny, .T M Cambrnn, .1 Ford’s orphans, J Littleton, S Moore, B Calmvav. T Moore, J Minton, J Boren’s orphans, N Childs, orp. J Hancock, .T M’Intosh, M A Blakey, S 8 Wellhorn, Win Plant, M Jones, wid.; Alfred Wellborn, B //arris,,Win Mathews, Henry //oltsclaw, J P.tones’ orphans, Wm Weaver. WILKINSON. F, Wehh, Wm Adam, ,7 Manderson, Vv Sikns, orp. S Gilmore, J Napper, R Purvis, It Etheridge. H Hutts. J Honks, It Dixon. I Garrett, C Davis, Eli Nunn, V Elkins, N Nicholson, Wm Mitchell, J Mays, l Hooks, R Turner, Win West, C Davis, P M’Crary, widow : J Murphy. J M'Clendnn, Z Psalter, 8 Bowing, A M’Cook, J G Baskin, Benj. M'Culler. POLITICAL. A NEW WORK. FROM THF. RICHMOND ENqOIRFR. There, is now in the press of this oily a new work, making about 3i)() pages, which will be published about the 15th November the name of the author, the important questions he discusses, and the bold and ori ginal manner in whieli lie diseosses them, ;ire.rnh'utaled (o stamp a value upon it. To give the reader some idea nfit. we lay before him its Title ; Table of Contents, and Pre face. CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUED, CONSTITUTIONS VINDICATED, BV JOHN TAYLOR, AUTHOR OF THE ENQUIRY AND All,'.Toil. Sections. 1. The Principle# of our Constitution. 2, Cjinstriietion. ft. Sovereignty. 4. The Union. ft. Division and limitation of Power. O. Property. 7. The Bank Decision—Corpora'ion. C. The Bank Decision—Sovereignty of spheres. P. The Bank Derision—Supremacy'. 10. The Bank Decision—Common De fence, and general welfare—Necessary and proper—Convenient—National. 11. The Bank Decision—Precedent 12. Protecting Duties and Bounties. 13. Assumption of Judicial Powers and Palron igr by Legislatures. 1 t. ThifLaW# of Nation#. 15. The Missouri Question. 19. Tlte Distressesufthe United Stater. PREFACE. The author of the following work ear nestly wished to remain unknown ; but circumstances having rendeml it irnpos- ible, bis alternative was reduced t.f an avowal, or an affectation of concealment; be hopes, however, that no one will be lieve him to have been induced bv mo ney, or fame, or any personal considera tion, except that kind of feeling experi enced when about to take a last leave of our friends, we. say to them, “ God bless you.” He docs not solicit (he indulgence of his readers, as lie wishes bis errors to be corrected • nnr dees he expect any, except from those whose interest is not disunited from that of tlx’ society. The. end of fostering eiemosynary fur.i- lies has evidently suggested a mode ol construing our constitutions, w Inch re quires that such phrases as the following should be reconciled : “ Sovereign ser vants—Supreme equality—Unlimited li mitations—Consolidated divisions—Infe rior superiority—And desirable mise ry.” Thus, representative power may be made despotic ; a coordinate sphere may be made supreme; convenience, like the waves produced by a pebble thrown nioolh water, may be made to undu late indefinitely—a subordinate judicial power may start up into a dictator to the tiite governments ; divisions and limit.t- tioas of power may he ctfhfounded anti abolished ; and English lollies are con verted from objects el our abhorrence into models of our imitation. Under a reconciliation between republican and despotic principles, effected by the new idea of ” sovereign servants,” our legis latures are converted into British parlia ments, daily new-modelling the substance of our government, by bodies politic ex individuals and combinations, at their pleasure. If our system of government produces these hitter fruits naturally, it is sub stnntially European ; and the world, af ter having contemplated, with intense interest and eHger solicitude, the experi ment of the United States, will be sur prised to find, that no e: periment at nil has been made ; and that it still remains to ho discovered, whether a political sys tem preferable to the British is within the scope of human capacity. But, if these fruits are not its legitimate off springs, but of foreign importation, we ought to fullil the hopes ol mankind, by returning to those principles in constru ing our system, by which it was dictated. Let us remember that the lucrative par- inlities of a government, instead of be ing destroyed by use, like the splendid fabric# of (ha loom bespangled with gold and silver to gratify pride and luxury, become richer and stronger, the longer they are worn by ambition and avnrice. The habit rf corruptingfur political system, by the instrumentality of infer ence, convenience anil necessity, with an endless series of consequences attach ed to them, is the importer of contraband principles, and the bountiful grantor of power not given, or withheld by our con stitutions. It is, therefore, the natural enemy of our homebred form of govern ment, and ought to awaken the resistance of all legislative and judicial departments, and tlte detestation of every person not enriched by this ruinous commerce.— Every lover of our institutions ought to be a vigilant custom-house officer, and do his utmost to prevent a heavy govern ment from being brought in gradually by these seemingly light skiffs. It is con venient for the transmission of taxes, that Congress should create banks; but the constitution does not delegate to the fe deral government a power to create po litical combinations, invested with a pow er to regulate the wealth and poverty of individuals. This new powerofindefi nite magnitude is, however, said to be conveyed, as n consequence of the cou- v/nieut mode of removing money. A- gaiti ; Congress have a power to regulate commerce ; but the constitutor floes not delegate to the federal government a power to make several states tributary to one, nor a power to make the people of all the states tributary to orcoinbinatiun of capitalist#, ronstiti ling, in fact, a hotly politic, materially affecting the interests of all'persons. In this case, also, the in ference is made to bestow a fat greater power than that from which it is extrac ted. The nourishment of exclusive inter ests, in all .its forms, is the universal cause which obstructs I lie progress of political science, and has placed that winch ought to he the /ifsi in the rear of human improvements. The emoluments attached to the ndminiRrution ofcivil go vernment ate unhappily a sufficient sug gestion to avaricu muiatnhition, tun: fraud and oppression tn.iy afford them gratifi cations. Even this excitement was view ed by Doctor Franklin as so dangerous to liberty, that he wished for its suppres sion, and refused to receive any compen sation as president of Pennsylvania ; and Washington would only receive bis ex penses for all'Tiis services. However impracticable those speculations may he, yet the opinions of these great men are weighty authorities against the policy of superathling to an unavoidable tempta tion a host of unnecessary solicitors in behalf of avarice and ambition, retained by exorbitant fees paid by the people, whilst no reward whatever is ollereffto the advocates for integi ily & moderation. By this pernicious policy a union is for med between the mluiinistratinns ol"go vernments mid corrupted combinations, creating an impulse towards oppression, which abstract principle?, however good, have hitherto been unable to withdraw. As the brightest beacon may be extin guished by throwing some hostile ele ment oil the Ibime, so tlte best principles are destroyed by fostering their foes. Yet the argument in firor of exclutivc privileges is, that it is the l»cst mode by which knowledge can bo advanced and arts perfected. Under color of this as sertion it is said tlml manufactures have never been introduced into any country, except bv tho coercion of the govern ment. Thus, a despotic power of distri buting wealth and poverty, ns (lie ca prices and vices of individuals may dic tate, is artfully coveretl by the pretext, that it is the best mode of a Ivnncing arts and scicricea ; hut the truth is, that they have flourished in proportion as industry has been free anti property safe. The gratitude of knouuledgo is, therefore, due to that power which ha# selected in- dufltry, and philosophers for its commu nication. The claim of governments to lie considered as the apostles of know ledge, is precisely the same with their claim to religious apostolic power, and experienc* has sufficiently proved that both powers beget oppression. This is a subject which would fill a hook of no small size, and therefore a nl principle, Ibil governments Might te have a power of granting e*clii»ire pri vileges. Yet it is highly worthy of pub lic considerntinn.-^-rrivileges imply a general deprivation. To take away in order to bestow, is merely to pull down w ith one hand for tbo purpose of buil ding up with the other, if the deprivation discourages as much induatry, a» the privilege will excite.---1 heie political rout! adictions would then neutrgliw each other. But, if the discouragement ope rates upon greater number* than the privilege, ns is always the ca#e, i* bal ance arises unfavorable to industry, arts’, aud sciences. Hence, they have flour ished as exclusive privileges have de creased, and dw incited where they a- hound. The abolition of a vast number of feudal and hierarchical privileges gave them a great impulse in England, and a gradual multiplication ofpecfirnlaW privi- . leges since, has brought the same coup- try to a state of misery, vv hit h may in volve them m the same general ronvul-, rion. Is this misery, or the mysterious advance# of knowledge and liberty, the best hostage tor their improvement ?— These have co-extensively pushed for ward all arts and sciences aided or un aided bv the patriotism of gnvenments, . anil agriculture has kept pace with thn rest, under exaction# and withuut boun ties. This concern it ancy ascertain# a'com- tnnn cause, establishes the ascendancy of knowledge, and explode# the necessity for the partialities of governments, or the policy of dispensing general evil, to enrich selected sects. After the dark ages a manufacturing superiority appear ed in Italy and France, without any spe cial patronage from their disorganized governments, because those countries surpassed’the rest of Europe in know ledge ; and several English king# tried unsuccessfully /o rival it by legal co ercions. The revocation of the edict of Nantes at length expelled a great ntas# of manufacturing knowledge from France, and supplied England with (he leading cause of manufacturing prosperity ; from litis epoch she dates hers. The im provements of machinery in England were the work of individual knowledge and industry, after her prohibitory sys tem had become nominal. The wonder ful art of ship building, carried to suchi perfection in the Unitpd' State#, propo sed to he cheeked by commercial restric tions, proves that when the knowledge of an art is obtained, it is only necessary that it should correspond wi;h the inter est of indit idnals. Compute and com pare the progress of the United States in- the. arts end sciences, in about thirty tears, with the progress of Europe > du-t ring a similar space, nnd anticipate its /I a h in six centuries, during which Eu-’ tope has been employed in effecting lier ? nttuinm.'nte. To whnt can the vast dif-, ferrnce in velocity toward excellence be ascribed, hut to a greater freedom of in ti lloct and industry ? Why, then, should tve substitute for these, avarice and. fraud, as letter teachers of art# and sci ences ? . 1 Alexander of Russia a few years past, asserted the right of all states to internal self-government, mid entered into a trea ty w ith the Cortes of Spain, to guaran tee the constitution they had made.— Now, to advance the interest of a com bination of monarch#, he renounces his principle and his honour, and even for bids '.he penitent Ferdinand to sveknow- ledge vvliat he had as-erted, and to con firm what he had guaranteed. The fe deral constitution as expressly guaran tees to the states the right of internal self- government. ; but a mode of construc tion is introduced to advance the interest ef mercenary combinations. Is not tlia analogy between the Russian and this mode of construction apparent l Tha dillerences are, that Alexander proposes to overturn principles aud a compact, by force, nnd constrtu tion nets by sap ; ha adheres to the interest of hereditary monarch# ; construction to the interest of exclusive privileges. The impor tance of these differences may be ascer tained by comparing force with fraud, and a confederacy of foreign kings, with a confederacy of domestic parasitical privileges. Whatever may be the re sult of (his comparison, it can offer us nothing but the old alternative between monarchy and aristocracy, and almost all w riters have agreed, that the former is to be preferred. Against all such inodes of construction, as being adverse both to republican principles, und’our positive institutions, the? humble reasoning tj.fThe following work is levelled, ..te. , Ncw-Yonx, Oct. 30. For the following important letter, we are indebted to a mercantile friend:— “ Liverpool, Oct, 6,1020.' “ Dear Sir— We have the pleasure to a- gain wait upon you with the result of last week’s business in. Cotton. There wtitre of fered nt auction 200 bags Sea-Island, of which 80 of fair quality were sold at 18 l-4d a lit l-2d ; 3220 Uplands, of which 1080 ve ry ordinary to good, gold at 9 1-4 a 11 l-4d, average 10 l-4d; 1140 Orleans, of which 380 very ordinary to good fair, sold at 9 l-2d :;v lTw"; sen'. JLthcws RJaeksot^M Jones, widow; Gj pr i viltft( ;’pensions, bounties, fc limited place would not admit.of its lull 1^,’^ JuThS. n it Mem 15T’‘rn'TuI’r "uVniv"*^Mt'en ! judicial acts, comprising an arbitrary application to tbe manufacturing art, so-L nl j Tennessee, of which ftO middling soldat . firiUon Hen -1ij‘hc'y', wbi.^Ym IVtv, John \v I pmver of dispensing wealth or poverty to* iectcd to establish the pernicious gcuor-! o i-4d a <J t-2d—dm rest were withdrawn*