Funding for the digitization of this title was provided by R.J. Taylor, Jr. Foundation.
About The Royal Georgia gazette. (Savannah, Ga.) 1779-1782 | View Entire Issue (May 31, 1781)
£ei/an and Spalding; *u, Janies Mficwell, Ton -of Aedlcr JCelfill and others <v. fame* “ * . ■ v £elfall and taother, survivors, ‘v j Kelfaii arid other#.t; Palmer Goulding ; J£el fa 11 and Spalding *v- fame; lv lfall and another, survivors, v. fame; Kelftil and others <v Jchn Goulding ; iaoiea Spalding v. Lachlan M'fntolh ; Leifall and SpUdirg Gideon Dcv. it ; Ke’fall and a o he?, fcrvivdrs <v. fame ; Graham and Kelfall, Efqrs. <th Roderick Williatnfon, ETq Sir |amei Wright, Bart. <v. Joseph Clay y L~_ : gaiil Cos wper v. Joseph Clay ; Wili am Telfair, Esq. <v. Joseph Clay and Joseph Haberfham ; John Bond Rai/dell r u. Joseph Habcrlham Same v. John Kean, furvivbr of Pe,er La Vien and Cos. John Nutt James Haberfham; Eleanor Patton v. Matthew Gr.filn ; Sir James Wright, Bart, v John Houf touh $ Same <v. Thomas Stone } Same *v. William P’Brycn ; and hav*. obtained in each of the fa’d causes a-tule to the following effect, viz. Ordered, That the defendant and defend, ants in the said several afticn# do appear and plead within a year ard aday, othrerwife ju lg. meni.will pass against him, her, or them, by default. By the Court, John Simpson, P. & C. C. ; 47th Ofl .1780. Noticed i t therefore hereby given, That * judghient will bs altered agreeab e to the a - against every qpthe fiid . ; j&Un&ijjm who mot . formaple thereto. */ Robbrtson, Plain tiffs Attorney in ISi laid several caoi'cs. fTfHereas the Protfojl Marffal of the province of * Georgia, by virtue of a nor it af attachment to him directed in the several caufet under - mentioned, did attach the lands, tenements goods , chattels monies, debts, and books of accouit, cf the several defendants in the said causes, nvho are absent from and w/thegt the limits of the said pro vtnce, at the suit oflhe several plaintiffs : And whereas the said plaintiffs have, agreeable to the ■ dire A ions of the Attachment A3, fled a declaration in the General Court again/ the Jeveral defendants in each of the following causes, v'z. jm Joachim fubly verjus David Xml!; David Maxwell verffs Coffman Pollock ; ff and have obtained in each of the said caujh a rule * to the following effedi, viz- Ordered, 7 hat the defendants in the said Cevernl aßions do appear and plead within a year and a day, Other wife judgment Will pa/s again(i them by default. . Bj the Courts ’ ]OHM SIMPSON, P. & C. C. O Holer 27, 1780. -Vr-’ Kotu, i, tbtrtfarc bireby gi vtn , That judgment. •Hill! bantered agreeable U ibe afmjaid rule er - trder dgainfl eaeb es the fdd defendants rn.be and, net appear and plead conformable thereto, FARLEY, Plaintiffs Attorney. JTff’HEREAS the Provo/i Marffal of the pro vince Os Georgia, b x virtue of a Writ of Attachment to him directed feveral taufes undermentioned, did attach the, lands and tenements, goods and chattels tnmies, debts, and b kjof ca fY without the halts of the sud province, at the fait of the several phint ffs : And Whereas the Jaid plaintiffs have re fp‘fitvelj agreeable to the Mre3ions of the At tachment A3, fled a declaration in the General Court again/the several ufenc&Hts in each of the Jollowing causes, viz, Sir James Wriglu, Birt. v. Nob’e Wim* * “My Jones i Graham, Esq. Noble Wimbe.l, Jo,*,. George W.im, Lyman Hall, Benjamin Andrew, John Elliot, lofiah Bacon, Par- Way, Gideon Dowse, and Jamea Cochran; . Sa “® Z- •••**. Ma " !n DaOier, ChnlLan Dalh r, John Cooper, and Ro bert Hit}fo© jiih; ..Same v William Holzendorff; - , < Stiles v, Elilha Maxwell • ,i>torr an£R led Peter Bard ; gowper and Telfair a;. EdwaJd Telfair and’ jamts Ao(s, who, . V, ooftcu , ri and Graham -u. Jofcph Reynold-; Jttf’lff' a ‘’“ J J n ‘ ac >>‘f‘b‘ /aid can/,, a ruU lit laid"*’ /. iff dtftndants in ‘ laidjt vtral t su, ¥ and, / ■’ * . “ **'"l ? nia *9> -fotnoiji, judgment did ini s g gttttffP kirn Os ite:n fPy default . Bj the Vou v, * 1 ’ •* *. w x? ” &U c. c. 4 • Jo/fl November,. \-7%0. , *ill h.e fntrr(d, agreeable to the or (said rule or trde r p againjl every ofthe said dfgndunti who do tut appear andplead confumuble tberciO) Robert son, Plaintiff Attorhtjg in the laid se veral cases. ■ ■ | ( “ f-r , m -■- 9 - - _ x Whereas the provoii Marihiiofthepro _ vinci*.of Georgia, try virtue of a Writ of Attachment to him directed, did attach the lands; tenements, good , chattels, . monies, debts and books of account, of William Watson, who is ab sent from and without the limits of the fajd pro ’ Vince, at the suit of Simon Paferfon and William Lang 1 And whereas the said Simon Puteffon ud ; William Lang have, agreeable to the directions of the Attachment A&, filed their declaration in the * General Court agair.ft the said William Watson, . and .have obtained the -following rule ; l - Emon is Al ) Ordered , ‘That the defendant ?, S a^n ? r do appear and ptead within a llift am Watson J year and a day, other wile judg v - meut by default. By the Courr, T J John,§4MpsoN, P. &C. C. | 7 24th Jarliar}', 17S1J Notice is therefore hereby given, That, unless the fajd Wili lam Watson do appear and plead a greeubie to the aforefaid rule or order, judgment will be entered againii him accordingly. Vm. JOiSES, Plaint.fis Attorney. f he Provost Marlhal of the pro fr’ “i AkltSClJlJWii ttrftmf affecreSTiTr the undermentioned, did attach the % lands and tene ments, good?, and chattels, monies, debts* and books of account, of the, several defendants in the laid caufci% who are absent fiom and without the limits ofthe/nid at the suit ofthe seve ral plaintiffs: And whereas the said plaintiff, have relpectivel), agreeahre to.-{he directions of the At tachment Act, filed a declaration in the Genferal Court agmnit the several defendants in each of the following esufe% viz. John Char lei Lucena versus Robert- Walton i Kelfall and Sliding verius J Wn Bacon fen. Ceorg e Hiulioun vertus Joseph Abrahams ; Kelt alt and another, fiir-viaors y versus Thomas . a aeon ; ar,d Hating versus Lemuel Lanier ; M L jun and others vedu, John T-ivro a f ; and hare obtained in each or the said causes a rule to the follow mg effect, v z OtftrO; Thi, the detemi :nt and defendants in the laic several actions do appear and plead within a year and a day otherwise j idgnient will pafi a gaicll them by default. ** By the Court, - Simpson, P. & C. C. , 44th January, 1 7 5,. Notice is therefore hereby given, That judg meat will be entered, agreeable to the .forefaid rule or order, against every of the fidd defendants who do not appear and plead- conformable thereto R.OoERrsON, Plaintiff, Attotadjr in the said several causes, k ® - ” - - Mil X— HERE AS the Provofi Marflial of the pco - v,nce by virtue of a Writ of Attachment to him directed in tfie causes under mentioned, did attach the lands and tenements goods and chattels, monies, debts, and books of account, of the defendantsin the fhid caufes* who are absent from and without the limits of the said province, at the suit of the several plaintiffs: And whereas the fard plaintiff* have refpe&ively, agree able to the direftiops of the Attachment Ad, filed a declaration in the General Court agaipff the seve ral defender.ts in each of the following causes, viz. lfaac Perry versus Fredericb Francis j Moore and Pantqn versus William Candler ; and have obtained in each of the said causes a rule to the following effed, viz. Orderedp 1 hat the defendants do appear and plead within aycar and a day, otherwise judgment. By the Court, John Simpson, P. & C. C. 2 jfch January, 1781. , J ’ Notice is therefore hereby given, That judgment will be entered, agreeable to the aforefaid rule or order, againff the said defendants who do ndt ap pear and plead conformable thereto. ’ h ARLEV, Plaintiffs Attorney in the said causes. •rrrHERF.AS the Provost Mar Ail ofthe provi^eTf” ** eo , r 2 n ’ v,rtc of * Writ of Attachment t. him direded in the several eaufe unierthentioned, did at ych the bnds and tenements, goods and chattels, monies, b - ooks °u accoun . t of the several defendants in the said iaules, who are absent from and without the li- W<* MFoYiHSe>eftllj fever*! plain*. iffs: And whereat tht said plaintiffs have refpeAivelr, if greeaWe to the dirtAions ofthe luJd i declaration in the general Court against the several de fendants’ in each of the following causes, via* r Edeeutria, and John Keart, Exeattor* of Grove, va. John Haberiham ? /. * Kean, fundvor, Same vs. faraej ‘-f-'". r ‘ Ifraei Bird V*. Sfivanhs Robefdn; Kean, survivor, vs. David Wheeler; ami ha*e obtained each of the said causes a rule to the following effoctj vix. thC defendant * ld defendants in the fs*d fexeral aft.ont do appear and plead within a year and a dat Otherwise Judgment, will pass against themhy default. * By the Court,’- • tL. *’ f John Simfson, P. *C.C. * J*nuaryi , be That J^Smen^wili ntered, agreeable to the atorefaid rule Or order, against every of the said defendants who do not appear and plead conformable thereto. . .. . . P Thomas Gtsiokj, Plaintiffs Attorney in the said feviral causes, .TTITor Gur Hcreas thePrOvoft Mar/hal of tMI pmvloco, tyvir attach ftt J*/ * W "’ ot Attachment to him dirtied, did Tht- fchattels, moniei> nflof 1F b w?T f C . oUn '’ ( ,n '- the hands and possession hti Euhbnh M*f arhan ?, rounfor ‘ and his wife, late fchz.ib.rh M Lean widow, who are dbfent from and without thehmitsot the said province, at the suit ofSa- Sm,L?nl e a |V n d A r- r / W Lorii: Aad w the said ’ d^^f, lafS / nd u ndrCW L^ rd have *B?eWle to the tbr C .1 Attachment Ail, filed their declaration in C J urt 6( . the said Province against the said f N a io?! rh ß r h nfon and , E,i2abeth his wife, and have ob taineil the following rule: Samuel Di/uglaft &ah y Ordered, That the defendants A | 3,n ' t (do appear and plead within a year Nathan Bratnjon Wfarid a day, othetwife'judgment m ‘f e ’ J will pass against them by default. ‘ -By the Court, - , .. • John SiMrsox, -P. Jc C. C. *itb AprH r r 7 Sti f , uatfifx the {uid plead agreeable to t he aforefaid ruse or order, judgment ’ w.ll be entered against them accordingly, ‘ Wm. Jones, .Plaintiffs Attorney o E O R G I A. the Provost Marihal of this province, by , 0t j Wr,t of A hmeHt to him dire#ed, b r tenements > chattels, monies, debts, and books of account, of Mordecai Sheftall, whoH absent from and without the limits of the fafd province, in the hands and ooffelfion of Levi Sheftall, at the suit of John I oulis; And whereas the said Levi Sheftall, as a creditor in l poffeflion, hath, agreeable to the direaioqs of the Attachment Aift, filed his declaration in his Maief. vV u Gea - er c a i ?°, l ! rt of thc said Province against the said Mordecai Sheftall, and hath obtained the following rule, Levi Shtfrull, creditor n Ordered, That the defendant m pojfefpony I do appear and plead within a veat sand a day, otherwise judgment Moi Jccai Sbeftal/. Jwiil pass again:! him by default; ‘ By the Court, . .. . John Simpson, P. &C. C. 2?th April, 1781. Noticels therefore hereby given, That; unless the said A-. rdecai Sheftall do appear and plead agreeable to the a forefaid rule or order, judgment will be entered against him VV m ; J owgs Attorney for the creditor in poffciliorw WHercPs the Provost Maiihal of the province of Georgia, by virtue of a Writ of At tachment to him dire&ed in the several causes un eeiojemionetl, dki attach the lands and tenements, goods and chattels, monies, debts, and books of account, of the several defendants in the /aid causes, who are absent from and without the limht of thefaid.province, at the suit of the several plaint. iffs; And whereas the said plaintiffs have respec tively, agreeable to the dire&ions of the Attach ment A&, filed their declarations in the General Court against the several defendants in efech of the following causes, v-z. v >/# aar ’ Moses bunes v. John Haberjham ; Ha ™ h Gibbons, Executrix of Joseph Gibbons, v. JoJeph Oibbons ; ‘Sht famt . William Gittcns i Tbt Executor of Watson v. Jonathan Bryan ; m < !hi a f„ e t| obti ‘' ned m m „ each of the causes a rule to the follow mg effect, viz. 1 and defendants in h an s ' V r a ’ afl,on ‘ do appearand plead within Jilt Mm and^ y ’ ° ,^*rw, lo judgment will pass a gamft him or them by default. By the Court, May 8, 7. Notice 1* therefore hereby given, That judg ment will be entered, agreeable to the aforelafd rule or order, agantf every of the said defendants who do not appear and plead conformable thereto. _ - EARLEY, Plaintiffs Attorney. T HAVE enquired into the PRICE of FLOUR y"*; I,Th } 3 zs. 6d. pd AWJ'Jd. of the belt iort ; Loaves Ihould therefore weigh as fol lows: > 4d. Loaf, <rr o lb. 15 oz. 1 dr. , , 7- Ditto, 1 6 14 14d. Ditto, • t 13 %2 r* ■ iEWIS JOHNSTON, Treaflftr-
