&crze HoufloUn versus Joseph Abrahatto l
jj'ghall and anotUr , survivor s, versus Thomas
Bacon ; .
KelfaU and Spalding verfas Lfmuel Lanier ;
M'Goun and others vcrfus John Twiggs ;
n d have obtained in each of the said causes a rule
\o the following effcft viz.
Ordered, That the defendant and defendants in
the laid fcveral aftioaa do appear and plead within
8 year and a day, otherwise judgment will past a-
VainU them by default.
® By the Court,
John Simpson, P. & C. C.
• 24th January, 1781.
Notice is therefore hereby given, That judg
ment will be entered, agreeable to the aforefaid
rule or order, against every of the said defendants
who do not appear and plead conformable thereto.
ROBERTSON, Plaintiffs Attorney
in the said several Causes.
WIIF.RE4S Provost Marshal of the pro
vihcc of Georgia, of a Writ of
Attachment to him diredle'd, did attach the land*,
tenements, goods, chattels, monies, debts, aid
books of account, of William Watson, who is nb*
sent from and w ithout the limit* of the said pro
vince, at the suit of Simon Paterson and William
Lang : And whereas the said Simori Paterson arid
f William Lang have, agreeable to the directions of
the Attachment Ad, filed their declaration in the
General Court against the said William Watson,
and have obtained the fail owing rule:
Paterson & Al. 3 Ordered, That the defendant
against fdo appear and plead within a
William Watson. j year and a day, otherwise judg
ment by default.
\ By the Court,
* - ‘ John Simpson, P. Sc C. C.
74th January, 17S1.
Notice is therefore hereby, given, Tl t nrjefs
■ tfie : ftM WlTlTair Watfdp- do appear’
greeable to the afore fa >'d rule or o.rder, judgment
WHI be entered again ft him according’}'.
■ Wm. JO ES, Plaintiffs Attorney.
_ - . -
WHEREAS the Provost Marshal of the province of
Georgia, by virtue of a Writ of Attachment-to
him directed in the several causes undermentioned, did at
tach the Ifinds and tenements, goods and chattels, monies,
debts, and Eoolcs of account, of the several defendants in
the said causes, who are absent from and without the li
mits of the said province, at the suit of the fever.il plaint
iffs! And whertas the said plalntiids have refnefiively, a
freeableto the diraftions of the Attachment Aft, filed a
declaration in the General Court againfj the several
fendan :s in each of the following g luies, viz.
Jane Grove, Executrix, and John Kean, Executor, of
Grove, v S . John Habrrffium ;
Kean, survivor, vs. Charles Starkey Myddleton ;
Same vs. fame;
Israel Bird vs. Silvanus’Rcbefon ;
Kean, survivor, vs. David Wheeler 5
•nd have obtained in each of the said causes a rule to the
following effeft, viz.
Ordered, That the defendant and defendants in the fiid
several a&ions do appear and plead within a year and a day,
•therwife judgment will pass aoainft them by default.
, By the Court,
* * Jjhn Simpson, P. &C. C.
24th January, 17S1. \ N
Notice is therefore hereby given, That judgment .will
he entered, agreeable to the aforefaid rule or order, agair.fe
every of the said defendants who do not appear and plead
conformable thereto.
Thomas Gibbons, Plaintiffs Attorney
.in the laid several causes.
Ipll J — *” -j— •—’ —” • ♦ rTM - --
llh R E, 4 S toe Provo/} Marshal 0/ the province
of Georgia,- by vh me of a Writ 0) Attachment
to aim dire fled in the undermentioned causes, did at
tach the lands , tenements , goods, chattels . monies,
debts, and hooks of account, of the defendants injfe
fold can es , <tvho are absent f r om and nvtihout the Ji
fnits lfj/js said province, at the suit of the refoeXi ve
plaintiffs; And whe bavr r,.
JpeQively filed their declarations in the General Court
agasnft the several defendants in the tulhivinr causes,
agreeable to the directions of the Attachment AS, viz.
James Her riot v. Da del Mole con ; as
- ffdnftoun, survivor of George Fraser, demaf
•d, st. Sarah Fcrref erf Executrix of'Jams s For
refer, dtetafed-, 1
**d bav< obtained h ,ach of the said causes a rule to
. the following rfieif, viz. v
” n- r^ere ** defendants in the fa:d several
*,, :ons do a PP ea randpl£aJ vlithia a year and a day,
mnvjfe judgment will pass againf him or her by
By the Court,
701 m Simpson, p. &c. c.
April rg, i 7 Br.
y,? 11 /* “. therefore hereby given, That judgment
J IU be *t*rsd, agreeablejo the aforefaid rule or or
er, againf each of the said defendants who does not
a *Vl^i and conformable thereto.
IrTZLT, Plaiut\ffs Attorney, in the above causes.
* GEORGIA.
XTTH, re3S thc p rhvoft Manlul es t Hi, province, by
VV t , v ‘ rr , uc * Wfit of Attachment to him directed,
iu* r ands ,’ tencrne nts,"goods, chattels, monies,
abf.nr f ® f , of Mordecai Sheftoll, who U
•She *4? W ifc Ut the limits of the said Province', in
t tttftds aod poffcflion of Le.vi Shcftall, at the suit of
Johjl Fotfii*: And whereas the said Levi Shcftall, as a
creditor in poffcflion, hath, agreeable to the <jire£l]on.s of
the Attachment A£l, filed his declaration in bt ß IVTpjcf
ty’s General Court of the said province against the said
Mordecai Sheftall, and hath obtained the following lule,
viz.
Levi Shcftall, creditor Ordered, That, the defendant
in pojfcjfcrt, f do appear and within a ye:y
Againff sand a day, otherwise jndga ent
Mordccui Shcftall, 3 will pass agiipft him by default.
- ■ ‘By the Court, ‘dl
John Simpson, P. & C. C.
25th April, iySr.
Nolice is therefore hereby given, That, unless the fa*d
Mwrdccai Slicftall do appear and plead agreeable to the a
forefaid rule or order, judgmctK will be entered against hind
accordingly.
Wm. Jones, Attorney for the creditor in pofleftion.
GEORGIA
WHereas the Provofl Marshal of this province, by vir
tue of a Writ of Attachment to him dire&e'd, dtd
attach the lands, tenements, gobds, chattels, monies,
debts, and book* of account, (In the hands and poffcflioh
of Joseph Fox) of Nathan Brounfon and Elizabeth his wife,
late-fflizabeth M’Lean widow, who ar4 absent from and
without thc'limit, of the said province, at the suit of Sa
muel Pouglafs aid Andrew Lord : And whereas the said
Samuel Dongiafs and rrew L*rd have, agrstable to the
. direction f •■he \t .'.-t-ric • j A'cb file * their tipclasftioh in
the Oeneraj Cou-t of the faid’ province against the said
Nathan Brounfon and Elizabeth hit wife, and have ob
tained the following rule: —....
Samuel Dor.glafi id a!- Ordered, That the defendants
Ag-'inft /do appear and plead within a year
Nathan, fir'iunfori and s and a day, oiherwife judgment
Wife. 1 will pass against them by default,
the Court,
———: : John SimasoHs P. So C. C.
April, 1781.
Notice is therefore ereby given, That, unless the said
Nathan Brcmnfort and Eli/3b“th h.is wife do appear and
plead agre able to the aforefaid rule or order, judgment
will be jcnlarpd agaiiift them accordingly. .
► Wm. Jones, 1 laintiffs Attorney.
T r/HVeas the Ptovoft Marsh;.! of the province
- V V of G- or jh. b\ r yl/ltir of a• wrtt of; at
’ tfiChrrfefft tht.-Xeu*-
_ • v ••••.■*• 7 •••■’ 7 ; i .
dermentiorerl v did attach tlxfirinds and tenements,
‘g'todV and chattels, mohies,’ debts, and book* of
account, of the several defendant's in the said
causes, who are absent from and without the li
mits of in? said province, at the suit of the several
plaintiffs t Aid whereas the laid plaintiffs have
refpefbve'y, to the dire&jons of the At
tachnrunt \:1, filed a declarat on in the General
’ C )u:t agai .il the several defendants in each of the
.following CutU'f, viz.
John V- Hub yfham Tate the
younger, J tepb lHhe>/harn a>;d John Haber
am. Executors of James Haberfbam the elder,
FjqdJteedftdi fi *
James hguiding, Pfq. v. Partninas May, Samuel
Miller. John fluktK db-r elder. Jojtu’j Powell,
Job-i P v.dfo J, and Ed ard Ball ;
Kell nil, l. q v. Samuel Satus j
Bpaeiding and KeifhH v James Lamon ;
Maenur, by v. Daniel ff'olecon ;
Marl ay, Executor of Maxwell, V. Samuel Miller',
and have obtained fit-each of the laid caulesa rule
to t.;e following effeift, - yet.
Ordered, i fiat the defendant and defendants ifi
the hud several .161 ions do appear and plead wiflv
in a year and a day, o.thei wife judgment will pass
agamft him or them by default.
By the Court, T‘
John Simpson, P. & C. C.
29th April, 1781.
Nonce is therefore hereby given, That jadg,
ment will be entered, agreeable to the aforefaid
rule or order, against every'of - the said defendanfs
wiio do not appear and plead conformable thereto.
RO'-iER > SON. Plaintiffs-.Attorney.’
\A/ iie e ’ 6 ine iviaiihal ot the province
W of Georgia, by virtue of A W;it of At.
direffiejjTTii^h e ffverai causes un
de, mentioned, did attach the lands and tenements,
and chattels, monies,’ debts, and hooks of
account, oft the several defendants in the said
Ciuries, Avtro are {|bferi| without the limits
1 ofttlicdaid pftfVlnce, at theTuit of the several plaint
iff : And whereas The said plaintiff* have refpec
tiyfly, ngreeab e to the dyre&ions of the Attach,
ment AdL declarations in the General
Court against the several defendants in each of the
following causes, viz.
Zubiy, Ext tutor of Mfoldburger, V Joseph Gay }
Zubly v. David Keall f.
Moses Nunes v John Haberfbam ;
Hannah Gibbons, Executrix of Joseph Gibbons, v.
jojepb Gibbons ;
Tbe fame y. Wiliam Gibbons } ; ‘
The Executor of Watson v Jonathan Bryan ;
and have obtained in each of the said causes a rule
to thie following effed, viz.
Ordered, X’h it the defendant and defendants in
the said several aftions do appearand plead within
a year and a day, otherwise judgment will pass a*
gairdt him or them by default.
By the Court, • - • **
... and John Simjsqn, p. u, C, C.
Msy 8, 1781, r
Notice* is therefore hereby* given, (Thai judg
ment will be entered, agrefeable to the aforefaid
rule or order, against cvety of the said defendants
who do not appear ants plead conformable thereto.
PARLEY, Plaintiffs Attorney.
■ ‘ . * ; *• *. ,
*f jlTTHervas the ProvoftMsr/fnl of the Geof-
VV . gia, by virtue of A Writ of Attaclrmcnt to him <3l
- did attach the lands, tenements, goods, chattel (
monies,, debts, and boots of KcMflnt, of Abraham De
roche, who is absent from and without the ftmiti of the
said province,' 4t the suit of John Hanglider : And whereas
the said John Hangliddr hh, agreeable to the dirfftiojjs
of the Attachment A Sty ffled his declaration in the Ge
neral Court against the said Abraham Deroche, and hath
obtained the following rule :
Hanglider T Ordered, That the defendant do appear and
versus I plead within a year and a day, otherwise
Derocbe. I judgment.by default.
By the Court, ,
I f John Simeson, P. Sc C. C.
J 26th July, .1781.
Notice is'therefore hereby given, That, unless the said
Abraham Deroche do appear and plead agreeable to the *-
forefaid rule or order, judgment will be entered against
him accordingly.
FARLEY, Plaintiff’s Attorney.
’ 1 ■■ ■ 1 -* .■ m*
WHereas the Provost .Marshal of the province of
Georgia, by virtue'* of a Writ-of Attachment to
him ujretted in the several causes undermentioned, did
attach the lands and tenements,-goods and chattels, mo
nies, debts, and books of account, of the several defend
ants in the said causes, who are absent from and without
the limits of the. said province, at the suit of the several
plaintiffs: And whereas the said plaintiffs have refpe&ive
ly, agreeable to the dire&ions of the Attachment Aft,
itied-a declaration in he General Court against the several
defendants in each of the following causes, viz.
Robert Farquhar v. John Adam Treutlen;
Mary Magdalen Gignilliat v. James Gignilliat;
Executrix and Executors of Peter Lavien v. Bard and
Thompson;
and have obtained in eacli of the laid causes a rule to.the
following, efteft, viz. , .j:
Ordered, defendant and defendants in the said
■-* several aft ions do appear and plead within a year and a day,
- will pass plmft them by default.
’ • v ■*. By the Court,. *
• John iSimesonj P. fi C. C.
25th July., 1781. .
Notice is .thc,;a!fore hereby given,'That judgment will
be entered, agreeable to the aforefaid rule or order, against
every of the fai.d defendants who do not appear and plead
conformable thereto. .
Gibbons, Pontiffs Attorney.
m 1-1- - rr T - ‘ I I mmmmmmnmrn
YTTHereas the Provost Marflial of the province
__yT of by v irtue of a Writ of Attach
ment to him direded i.n the ffvgralA&ufh. under
mentionecfl dkl attach the lands and tenetnentf,
goods artd # chattels, monies, debts, and books of
account, of the fSveral defendants in the said
causes, who are absent from and without the limits
of the said province,, at the (uit of the several
plaintiffs: And whereas the said plaintifß have
refpeftively,’ agreeable to the dire&ions of the
Attachment Ats, filed'a declaration In the Gene
ral Court against the several defendants in each of
the following causes, v;z. / . J. .
Samuel Hunt Jenkins and William Gibbons ,
survivors, V'. Alexander Reid ;
William Fox and Cos. v. John AT Lean ;
William Knox , Esq. v. Matthew Griff n ;
Joshua Pearce v. O’ Bryen and Wade ;
and have obtained in each of the faki'Caufes a rule
to the following effett, viz.’ .
Ordered , That the defeodant'and defendants io
the said several aifions do appear and pjead within
a year and a day,, otherwise judgroeut will pass a
gainst him or thenvby'defauit.-
Bynhe Cdurr, • 4
John StMVSoii; P. & C. C.
August 9, 178 1, ■
Not-ice is therefore hereby given. That judg
ment will be entered, agreeable to the aforefaid
rule or order, against nvery of the said defendant!
who do not appear and plead corifirmable thereto*
GIBBONS, Plaintiffs Attorney.
gg j . __ —.77.--
- ‘ ‘ * 1,1 “ “
“YTTHereas the Provost Marshal of the proviac®
.YX Georgia, by- of * Writ of Attach
ment to him.dire6Jed, did attach a Mulatto WO7
mart^ lave * n . anre<l Fanny,* and- her Child, the
property of Samuel S,tirk, who is absent from and
without thejinjits of province, at the suit
of Catharine Gordon and .Janet, Gordon: And
whereas the* said Catharine Gordon and Jane Gor
don have, agreeable to the *diregions of the At
tachment A6t, filed their declaration in the Gene
ral .Court jigaiqft the said Samuel Stirk, and have
obtained the following rule : <
Cat Purine Gordon's Ordered, That the defend
& al, I ant do appear and plead within
• a g air jft .. (a year and a day, otherwifiA
+ Samuel Stirk* /judgment by default.
By the Court*
John SrMPsow, P. & C. C#
. J Oth August, 1781. r
x Notice is therefore hereby given, That, unless
the said Samuel Stirk dd appear and plead agree
able to the-aforefaid rule or order, judgment will
be entered against him.accordingly.
r— Wm, Jones, Plaintiffs Attorney.
