The Bainbridge weekly democrat. (Bainbridge, Ga.) 1872-18??, April 11, 1872, Image 1
THE
WEEKLY DEMOCRAT.
VOLUME I.
BAINBRIDGE, GEORGIA, THURSDAY, APRIL 11, 1872
HUMBER 44
The Weekly Democrat,
PUBLISHED
every Thursday Mournso.
SUBSCRIPTION TERMS:
One Copy one year - - - $8 00
One Copy six months - * * 1 50
Reading Matter on Every Page.
From the Atlantd SutL
Ex-Gov. Jenkins’ Letter to Gov.
Smith.
It if" with no ordinary pleasure tve
lay liefore our people the lolloping
highly important and exceedingly
interesting letter from that noble
citizen of Georgia, Chaa. J. Jenkins,
detailing historical facts and retain
A .connected with his adiaiuis-
its removal from office as-j March, 13«6. amounting to six hun-
vrfltiuu
Governor of Georgia.
It is a simple recital, sublimely
grand in its simplicity, logic and
truth; ,
Augusta, Ga., March 13,18 <2.
His Excellency, James M. Smith.
Sir—Since my removal from the
office which you now hold, in Jan
uary, 18G8,G>3 Major General Meade,
of the United States Army, com
manding Department of Georgia, I
have refrained from communication
with the dc facto government of the
State.
Hail there been no interference of
the Federal Government, my term of
office would have expired in Novem
ber, 1867, and there would then have
been assembled a Legislature to
whom I would have rendered an ac
count of my stewardship, accompan
ied by the usual reports of the Treas
urer and Comptroller General for the
year. Such a communication, with
like accompaniments for the preced
ing year, had been submitted to the
General Assembly at their second
session in November, 1866. There
having been neither Governor or
Legislature elected in 1867, I under
« provision of the Constitution, held
• <ovei; hut there was no Legislative
Assembly. From the time of my re
moval until the installation of the
present Governor and Legislature,
those departments have not, in my
judgment, been filled by persons
rightfully representing the people of
Georgia, or faithfully guarding their
interests.
I am informed that a committe ap
pointed for that purpose by the Leg
islature convened in 1868, examined
the books and accounts of Mr. Treas
urer Jones lor tfhc last year of my
administration, and ccporwxl thorn
correct.
I desire, however, to make a for
mal representation of Certain trans
actions during my official term, of
which no account has been given,
and some of which have been gross
ly misrepresented to the public.
Such a communication to a State
Executive, from «, predecessor, is, I
know, unusual, if not unprecedented;
but I trust you will find in the cin
cumstances, heretofore and now sur
rounding me, a justification of it,
and that you will kindly place it on
tffie, with the archives of the State,
where it may hereafter be accessi
ble for reference if desirable.
I need scared}' remark that, ow
ing to the snsjiension of the State
government at the close of the war—
serious complications with the Fed.
«t;U government reselling from that
conflict—the utter exhaustion of our
treasury, the impoverished condition
■of our people, and the interference
by Congressional legislation with the
■State government first iaangurated
after the war, my administration
\vas fraught with difficulty, respon
sibility anil anxiety. When I enter-
«d upon the duties of the office there
Was no money in the treasury—there
were outstanding liabilities of Gov
ernor Brown's last term, (owing to
his removal by the United States
government several months before
its constitutional cad)—debts con
tracted by Provisional Governor
Johnson, to carry on the govern
ment and the expenses of the Con
vention of 1865, provided forty tem
porary loans. There were also ante-
war bonds, and interest coupons of
considerable amouut which matured
during and after the war—the ex-
|>ensc of the Legislature which came
in with me, and the accruing de
mands of the civil list.
The bed and track of the Western
9»d Atlantic railroad were in a di
lapidated condition, its depots and
bridges in a great measure destroy
ed, and its rolling stock partly lost
or destroyed and partly worn out
and valueless. Its Superintendent
pgderJYovisional Governor Johnson,
*vith Ins approval, had contracted a
/debt with the Untied S&des Govern-
p*euA of about four hundred and sev
enty thousand dollars (470,000) in
/the purchase of rolling stock and
other railroad property, ami still in
these items there was a large defi
ciency.
The Capitol, its grounds ami fur
niture, and the Executive Mansion
and its furniture required extensive
repairs and renewals. The Peni
tentiary had been partially burned
and rendered insecure, requiring a
large outlay }q rebuilding and
strengthening it.
Besides all this, there were no
,5*? es collected in 1865. In view of
this condition of our financial affairs,
|t must, I think, surprise the reflec
ting mind that the Legislature, to
meet these liabilities, and put the
machinery of government again in
motion, resorted to' the credit of the
State by the issue of its bonds only
to the amount of three millions and
thirty tiiousand dollars($3,080,000.)
The Convention of 1865 did, in
deed, authorise the issue of bonds,
amounting to five hundred thousand
dollars ($500,000) to meet the em
ergencies < f the hour. But these,
owing to restrictions put upon them,
were found available only for tery
short loans, ahd were so used, and
redeemed with proceeds of bonds af
terwards authorized by the Legisla
ture, except about twenty-six thous
and dollars, (20,000) which had not
been presented at the Treasury, al
though called in.
There were also bonds authorized
by 7th section of the act of 12th
($3,030,000.)
The authority for issuing these
bonds, and the purposes, to which
they Wefe to be applied, will be
found in the act of the 12th ofMareh
1860, and the i 1th section of the
General Appropriation Act of the
same year. The following items
embraced in the act first mentioned
were obviously provisions for funding
existing indebtedness, and therefore
did not increase the public debt:
Section fl—To pny the nu nred bond debt
and intex'eet thereon 930,000
Sec. 1—To pny debt to United >-Uiten Gov
ernment for railroad property purchas
ed during Provisional Gov. Johnson’s
•term, and iuterest 500,000
IiTians con (fact*d by Provisional Gover
nor Johnson ..... .. 30,000
dred thousand dollars ($600,000,)
to pay file land tax issued by the
United States Government against
the people of Georgia.
These bonds were engraved witli
others, but as the Uuited States
authorities refused to receive pay
ment of the tax from the Executive
of tiie State, were not signed or seal
ed until after the next session of the
Legislature (Nov. 1866.)
On their assembling, I reported to
them the failure to use these bonds
for the purpose intended, and ad vis
cd that the Executive be authorized
to issue them in redemption of,
or change for bonds of the State,
which would mature within a short
time. Authority to that effect was
given by the Legislature, and then
these bonds in all respects similar to
other bonds issued under the act of
March 12, 1866, were executed. As
tiiesc bonds bore a higher rate of in
terest than tiiose to be redeemed by
them, and were secured by a mort
gage on the Western and Atlantic
Railroad, it was believed that no
difficulty would be encountered in
exchanging them for the latter on
terms advantageous to the State,
and thus our suffering people be re
leased from taxation, to meet a heavy
demand upou the treasury at no
distant day. They were according
ly placed in the National Bank of
the Republic (New York) for that
purpose, and notice of the terms on
which the State would make tiie ex
change extensively published. This
exchange had been commenced, but
no great progress had been made in
it at the time of my removal. Know
ing no safer place of deposit for
them, and desiring not to suspend
the process of exchange, I suffered
them to remain there, giving writ
ten instructions to the agent to con
tinue it, but beyond that, to deliver
them to no person except upon the
order of John Jones, Treasurer, or
of myself.
The Legislature assembled in
1868, /passed a resolution authoriz
ing the Governor inaugurated by
them to take possessionfof all bonds
of the State executed but not nego
tiated, wherever to be found. Un
der this authority, as I have been in
formed, the acting Governor R. B.
Bullock, demanded of the bank the
uncxchangeil bonds then in their
possession, and the agent, under le
gal advice, surrendered them to him,
but required of him an indorsement
on each bond, of the manner in
which he became possessed of it.
The precise amount so delivered I
know not, but suppose it could have
varied little from six hundred thous
and dollars. I am, of course, ignor-
aut of what disposition has been
made of them. If they have been
faithfully applied to the object in
tended, they have not increased the
indebtedness of the State, but have
only postponed, to a more conven
ient time, its payment, protanto, and
the relief has accrued, or will accrue,
to the administration succeeding
mine.
If otherwise, the misapplication
is chargeable to the Executive, who,
rather than conic to an account with
the fairly elected and honest repre
sentatives of the people he has charg
ed with having plundered, inglori-
ously fled l he State. In no event
can those bonds be fairly set down
as an original indebtedness incurred
by the State during my official term,
and by my advice.
Other bonds were issued by me,
in conformity with the act of Febru
ary, 1856, authorizing a subscrip
tion to the stock of the Atlantic and
Gulf Bailroad Company, acd the
issue of bonds of the State, in pay
ment of installments on that stock,
as the corporation might show itself
entitled to them. Evidence that
they were so entitled, was in each
instance adduced, before the bonds
were issued: amounts, debts, etc.,
will appear by reference to the re
cords of the Treasurer's and Comp
troller General's offices..
But this Jiabilty was incurred ten
years before my time. The amount
of the two classes of bonds
last mentioned have, in an indisci im
itating. unscrupulous partisan spirit,
beeR adiled : to the three million* and
thirty thousand mentioned before,
and the grand aggregate presented
as gn increase of the public debt
under my administration and by my
advice.
I think I have disposed of those
two classes, and will not again refer
to them. I now propose to show
that the publie debt was increased
Making an aggregate uf.... $1,360,0.0
Which deducted from the new bond debt
of $3,030,000 leaves as increase of public
debt.... 1,670,000
Among the sppropriatlons filade and paid
from proceeds of these bonds were two
extraordinary items of pure charity,
ha ring All the moral obligations of
debts, viz.; to purcLX* e co: n for the des
titute aud artilicisl limbs lor disabled
soldiers .,... 220,000
Learinga balance of....... 1,450,000
This balance was relied upon to
repair and complete the equipment
of the Western and Atlantic Rail
road: to repair and refit the State
House, and its grounds, the Execu
tive Mansion and furniture; the Peni-
tentia;y; to pay the unfunded debts
of the State (by no means inconsid
erable,) and to defray the entire ex
penses of the government for one
year, including the support of its
great public charities, and the ac
cruing annual interest on the public
debt.
This sum of* oiifs ttiillicn font* hun
dred anil fity thousand dollars was
subjected before it came into the
Treasury for general use, to a dimi
nution by the -expenses incident to
the preparation and engraving of
the bonds, the execution of the mort
gage, commissions to agents employ
ed in the sale of them, and the rate
of discount upon them, for no bonds
of any other Southern State could
then be negotiated at par value.
The 1 Kinds first sold—about nine
hundred thousand dollars ($900,000)
in amount—yielded about ninety
per cent. A few were aftewards
sold for ninety-five, and they would
undoubtedly have reached per value
in the market but for the depressing
effect of the Congressional legisla
tion upon the credit oi the Southern
States. Under this withering influ
ence, these bonds afterwards fell
below ninety in the New YoVk mar
ket. For more minute details re
specting the disposition of these
bonds, reference is made to the _re-
cords of the Treasury aud of Comp
troller General’s office, to which as
I write I have not access.
I have mentioned a debt contrac
ted by the Provisional Superinten
dent of the Western and Atlantic
Railroad under Provisional Gover
nor Johnson, and which debt occas
ioned my first unpleasant complica
tion with the United States Govern
ment. The Superintendent insisted
that he was by the terms of the con
tract, entitled to a clear credit of
two years, upon the amount of the
purchase. The Sale-Agent of the
United States, on the contrary, af
firmed that by the terms of sale, the
purchaser could only be entitled
to such credit on giving bond with
approved personal security, for the
payment of the debt at? the expira
tion of two years; in default of which,
monthly payments of the twenty-
fourth part of the debt, with inter
est, at 7.30 per cent, must be made,
until the debt was extinguished. The
contest between these officials was
an unequal one. The monthly pay
ments were peremptorily demanded
I suggested to the Legislature the
expediency of authorizing the Su
perintendent of the Western and At
lantic Railroad to give a bond for
the payment of the debt within two
years, and of pledging the faith of
the State for its payment. Accord
ingly the act of the 13th March,
1866, was passed, and a bond execu
ted in conformity with it, and deliv
ered. Still, for lack of personal se
curity, the monthly payments were
demanded. In an interview with
Mr. Stanton, Secretary of War, I
protested against this, and insisted
on the payments oi the whole sum
at the expiration of tiie two years—
urging that the pledge of the State’s
credit was more than equivalent for
personal security.-
He heard me patiently, but when
I concluded, remarked curtly, “I
can give you no relief. You seem to
think because this railroad is the
property of the State, and the debt
incurred, her debt, and because she
had given her bond for it, she
should be admitted to the privilege
of purchasers giving bond security. I
cannot make that distinction. The
terms must be complied with.”
I asked permission to take issue
with him on that Doint. I pressed
upon him the universal recognized
comity between nations and States,
between organized governments,
and stated a carollary from it, that
one Government would accord to
another a credit never given to an
individual, I concluded thus: “I
have not supposed, Mr. Stanton, I
should live to see the day when the
Uuited States Government would
send the Governor of a State out to
hunt after personal security for a
money contract. I cannot lower
the dignity of my State by doing
such an act.”
The eteth Secretary relented, con
sldered, and finally took the matter
before the Cabinet, who referred h
to the Secretary of War, and the
Attorney General, with power to
act. I then went before the latter
to discuss the question with him. So
soon as I broached the proposition
requiring a Slate to give personal
security for a debt, Mr. Stanberry,
that upright man, courteous gentle
man, and able jurist, interrupted
me with the remark, “Governor, I
confess that proposition revolts me.”
“As it has done me, Mr. Attorney
General,” I replied. He rejoined,
“Oh, that will not do. Mr. Stan
ton must give that up.” And he
did glrc it up, and cheerfully, at
last.
I refer tpxthig matter partly to
show that, among those distinguish
ed men, members of the administra
we may infer, by the
CalSS^^E jeorgia was, at that time,
recognize^ as having the status of a
State of the Union.
Early in the year 1860, the Collec
tor of Internal Revenue for the 4th
District of Georgia, required the
Superintendent of the Western and
Atlantic Railroad to make monthly
returns to him on the gross receipts
from the road,jand to^pay a tax of
2 1-2 per cent, upon them.
Believing the tax to be illegal,
because assessed upon the revenue
of the State, L appealed against it
to the Secretary of the United States
Treasury, who, after a reference of
the question to the Solicitor of the
Treasury and a report by him, over
ruled my appeal and ordered the
collection to proceed. Not satisfied
with the decision, I filed a bill in
equity in the District Court of the
Uuited States, in the name of the
State of Georgia, against the Collec
tor; seeking to enjoin the collection
of the tax. After argument upon a
rule against the Collector, to show
cause in Chambers why an injunction
should not issue, the Judge reserved
his decision until tin next term ot
the Court iu Atlanta; but assured
the Solicitor ot the State, in the
presence ot the District Attorney
and the Collector, that meantime
no further action iii collection of the
tax would be taken.
During his temporary absence
from the State, however, and before
his decision, the Collector peremp
torially demanded payment of the
tax then accrued (amounting to
more than twenty-four thousand
dollars) within ten days, in default
of which a levy would be made upon
the property of the road. Informed
of this, I directed the Superinten
dent to pay under protest, which
was done.
As soon as practicable afterwards
in a personal interview with the Sec
retary of the Treasury, I brought
all those matters to his consideration
and found him profoundly ignorant
of the filing of the bill, the proceed
ings in Chambers, the assurance of
the Judge respecting suspension of
action, aud the subsequent inforce
ment of payment. I do him the jus
tice to say that he manifested genu
iue surprise and indignation at the
last stage of the proceeding. He pro
nounced it “all wrong,” and immedi.
aiely summoned bet'oie him the Depu
ty Commissioner of Internal Revenue
(the chief being absent at the time,)
who, after hearing the recital, concur
red in the Secretary’s opinion, and
declared himself equally ignorant and
innocent of the wrong.
The result was that the Secretary
ordered the suspension of the collec
lion, until reutlitiou of the Judge’s de
cision, (saying he thought I had adop
ted the best course for the settlement
cf the question,) but declined to ri
fund the sum paid under dures
which had been pronounced “all
wrong” until the decision was made.
At the next term of the Conrt,
Judge Erskine delivered an elaborate
opinion, concluding with an order of
junction pendente litft. A copy of
this decision was forwarded to the De
partment with a second demand of
payment, which was declined on the
ground that the Secretary was consid
ering the propriety of carrying up the
question.
The Collector, I was informed, nev
er answered the bill nor put in an ap
pearance; and at the September term,
1867, the Jndge granted a perpetual
injunction, and decreed that the sutu
paid under duress, be refunded.
A third demand was then made for
repayment, but I was answered that
the legality of ilia tax had been refer
red to the Attorney General of the
United States, and that the Depart"
ment would await his opinion. That
was soon after given, sustaining the
decree of the Court, which declared
the tax illegal. Then upon a fourth
demand the money was refunded, but
interest on it was rpfused. although
the Treasury of the United States had
held it about eighteen months, and al
so during the same time, interest was
accruing at the rate 7.30 per cent,
against the Western and Atlantic
Railroad to the United States, on the
debt before mentioned, and soon after
paid in fulL
B ut for this appeal to the Judiciary,
in limine, it cannot be donbted that
tbisonerou3 and illegal lax Would,
year after year, have been extorted
from oar impoverished State by the
spoiled aud spoiling millions of pow
er. It is but one of many exhibitions
of the tyrannous and rapacious spirit
j l which the ruling party have requited
the unconditional six) n-ineere sub
mission of the Southern people to tbe
authority of tbe Federal ^Government
These wrongs I impute to the ruling
party—tbeir* Is tbe mu; and theirs, iu
tbe time of recompense, will bn
tbe shame and tbe suffering. We can
only possess ourselves in patience,
looking for ihe outstretching of Ills
right arm, who has «ai<l, ‘‘ Vengence
Is mine any I void repay.”
Bpt these things should not be al
lowed to pass unheeded or uuebrosi-
cled.
Great as were the embarrassments
encompassing the office during tbe
first year of my term, they were vastly
increased by tbe passage of tbe Recon
struction Acts, and tbe entrance into
tbe Slate of a military ebieftuin, trans
ferred from “head-quarters in the
saddle” to tbe beudquaiteis in Atlau
la. This man came invested with des
potic power over tbe people of Geor
gia, and with authority, at his sover
eign pleasure, to remove from office
any one of their chosen servants. And
these tilings, shades of Washington,
Jefferson and Madison 1 were done,
notwithstanding the distinct recogni-
tic n of Georgia (cither before they were
commenced or daring their porgiess) as
a Stats within the, Union by every de
partment in the Fedeltll Government.
I pause not, to produce proofs of (be
assertion; but I cha'lengc an issue
upon it.
These reconstruc ion acts, it will be
remembered, had been passed by the
Congress of the United States over
he veto of tbe President, based upon
their unconstittuiouality. So soon
action was tskeu under them—so soon
as the fool of the military despot was
impressed upon the soil of Georgia—
epaired to Washington and filed
bill in the name of the State of Geor
gia, against the intruders in the Su
preme Court, seeking to enjoin aud
set aside these proceedings, as in
fringements upon tbe reserved sover
eignty of the State, and in violation
of the Constitution of the Uuited
States.
The right of the State to file that
bill, and the jurisdiction of the Court
in the case depended upon the fact
alleged, and she was one of the State
of the Union. As a foreign power, or a
conquered province, she would have
had no right to do so—the Court, had
no jurisdiction in the premises. Still,
as the records of the Court show,
upon full presentation of the com
plaint, formal permission was grant
ed to tile the bill; nor was she after
wards dismissed the Court, nnredress
ed, on the ground that she lacked
that status.
After argument, the bill was dis
missed because in it there was alleg
ed neither interference, not* the threat
of interference, witli her property,
which the Court held was necessary
to make a case for their sublime con
sideration. Nothing, so far, had been
disturbed, or threatened, save the
tnodesl, though peculiar, priceless
diadem of her reserved sovereignty,
(in Radical estimation a paultry
bauble), of which that elevated Tri
bunal could not condescend to take
cognizance.
The deep humiliation Which theft
pervaded the entire mass of a proud
people—proud in their historical
reminiscences, and their conscious
ness of thorough rectitude of inten
tion of conduct, will be long remem
bered. Their final submission was as
truthful and unqualified as their re
sistance had been honost, open, and
heroic.
But that humiliation Was intensifi
ed iu the person of their Executive,
forced as he was by circumstances,
into daily contact with the insolence
of an intruded Ruler, trained to arbi
trary military command, unfamiliar
with civil government, and rChdei-
ed giddy by his unwonted eminence.
Had I yielded to the promptings of
personal feeling, I would at oftce
have escaped the pain of this unpre
cedented subordination by resigning
the office. But knowing that the
position would enable me to keep
open to our people, a channel of com
munication with the Chief Magistrate
of the Union (who was a reluctant
agent in their erushde against liber
ty) and might thus in some degree,
alleviate their sufferings, I resolved
to remain in it, yielding all questions
of mere policy, but maintaining prin
ciple, to the extent of my power,
and falling (if fall I must) in its de
fense. I was powerless to prevent
the removal of faithful officers, of
the judicial department, or tbe ap
pointment of others to fill their places,
or to arrest the latter, in the unau*
thorized exercise of their ill-got
ten offices; but I declined to pay them
the salaries appropriated to officers
constitutionally appointed and com
missioned. This alone would proba
bly have induced my removal; but an
occasion of greater moment soon af
ter occurred.
The Congress of the United States
by their nefarious reconstruction acts
had provided for the assemblage of
Convention, at Atlanta, to frame
Constitution lor the State in lieu
of that adopted in ’65, after the dose
of the war. . The latter was confess
edly Republican in character, ac
knowledged as the Supreme law ot
the State, the Constitution of the
United States and all acts of Con
gress in conformity therewith—had
received the President’s approval,
and under it, the existing State Gov
ernment bad been organized.
The Congressional act which call-
ed-tbe Convention pf ]ge7 and ig£g
together, provided for defraying
their expenses, only by authorizing
them to levy » tax for that purpose.
The body, finding themselves anpro-
vided with subsistence, and incapa
ble of feeding upon their patriotism
until relieved by the process of taxa
tion, experimented •♦non the credit
ot tl»e State, which though always a
previously reliable resource in emer
gencies, failed to attract capital
wheu tampered with by them.
In this extremity, they turned
their longing eyes upon the Treasu
ry of the State. Whether originally
prompted, or only encouraged by
the military Dictator, they passed a
resolution requiring the Treasurer
of the State to pay to their financial
agent the sum of forty thousand dol
lars, for the present use of the Con
vention. This resolution (being only
an vutering wedge) waa approved by
General Pope, under whose broad
shadow they held their daily sittings’,
and armed with this high 'authority,
the agent designated repaired to Mi In
edgeville, aud made formal demand
of the money upon Colonel John Jones,
Stale Treatirer.
That worthy gentleman and faith
ful officer, refused payment, in the ab
sence of au Executive Warrant. About
this time General Pope, (proofs of
whose numerous abuses of power had
been multiplied to the President by
myself and others,) was removed from
Ins command in Georgia, and General
Meade appointed to succeed him. One
of the successor’s first acts was a requi
sition upon me for a warrant upon the
Treasurer to satisfy the demand of the
Convention. With this I refused to
comply, on tbe ground that the Cotisli”
tntion, under which 1 was elected and
iuauguated, and which I had sworn to
obey, expressly provided that no money
should he taken from tbe Treasury,
except by Executive warrant, upon
appropriation made by law; and that
no appropriation ha-1 been made by
law to defray the expenses of that
Convention. I insisted that the requisi
tion was unwarranted, eveu by the re
construction acts. The Congress had
nos ventured upou an aat so flagrant
as the direct appropriation of money
from the Treasury of Georgia. But
they i ad bestowed a largess of power
upon a military chieftain, whoso lack
of training in the principles of civil
government, rendered him little scrupu
lous in overstepping constitutional
barriers. I felt, aud feel, that the
argument was with me; but tbe power
was with the General, and beneath its
pressure, I mid the urgnment went
down together. I was removed by a
military fiat, and Brevet-Brigadier-
General Roger, of the U. S. Army, a
subordinate of Gen. Meade, appointed
to supercede me.
On presenting himself to assume the
Government, the appointee in answer
to a question by me, read ine an ex
tract from his instructions, directing
him, in case of resistance, to employ
such force as might be necessary to
overcome it. Having at my command
no force whatever, I contented mys3lf
with a protest against the proceeding,
a9 a flagrant usurpation, violative of
ihe Constitution of the United States,
and a declaration that I forbore re
sistance, only because I Was powerless
to make it-=-aud so retired.
I believe it is pretty generally under
stood, that as far as practicable, in the
brief interval allowed me, I placed
tbe movable values of the State, aud
certainly the money then in the Treas
ury, beyond tbe reuch of the spoilers,
and in the exercise of a legal discre
tion, suspended the collection of tax
es then iu progress. At all events the
immediate oqject of this extreme
measure, the placing of the funds act
ually ill tbe Treasury at the disposal
ot the Constitution -makers, then un
constitutionally Assembled at Atlanta,
was defeated. Cotemporaneonsly with
this entire, undisguised usupation of
the Executive Office, those military
men took actual possession of the
State Capitol, and its grounds—K>f the
Executive Mausiou aud its furniture
and grounds, and of the archives of the
State.
Furthermore, they revoked my order
suspeDdicg tbe collection of taxes,
which they required the collector to
pay to their owji ’appointed treasurer,
seized upon the iucorne of the Western
and Atlantic Railroad (then in goo<£
order, and ancoeasful operation] and,
in short, took within their grasp every
dollar of the subsequently incoming
revenue of the State.
No insinuation is intended, that
they appropriated to their own use
soy portion of the State’s money, un
less in the way ..of salaries to which
they were not entitled, and about
which I know nothing.
It is doubtless true that they went
out with cleaner hands than did their
immediate successors, the so-called
Representatives of tbe people.
The charge is, that by the strong
hand of power, they wrested this prop
erty from the rightful possession of
the constituted authorities of tbe
State, and applied it, in their discre
tion, to public uses authorized by her
fundamental and statutory law, and
subversive of her sovereignty.
Seeing that they bad then made
themselves amenable to the jurisdic
tion of the IL S. Supreme • Court, as
that Court had been understood to de
fine it, in their decision of the previous
case, and believing myself still dejure,
though not de facto, Governor ot tbe
State, I again went before the tribu
nal, alleging these acts of progreseive
usurpation, aud seeking redress
against the wrongdoers.
Tbe bearing of dm erne would karst
broogbi dietioctfy major tbe itTieW of
tbw Coon the oooauustioaaiity of ifid
reeoaetiaction «c's, which 1 especially
desired. Not m> ihe Court. They—'
or a majority ol then— Mt a royal
repugnance to that delicate iaeoq.
Leave to AU tbe bill, on application
made in open Court, and upon a state'
men* of tbe allegations contained in
it, was onheeitaxingly given; tbs Ah*
torney General of ihe United States
being present, and making so objec
tion; aud the bill was delivered to the
Clerk.
But tbto permission was revoked
within twenty-four hoars, as having
been improvideotly granted, although
it ueither infringed any existing inlo
of practice, nor committed the Coert
to anything toaebiog the merits of tbs
case. Then why revoked ? For no
conceivable reason other than to opus
that cms to the operation of ~a new
rule of practice, adopted after the pev>
mission to file the bill; and .which pro
duced unnecessary and vexations di<
lay. Yet more, in consequent stages,
additional delays were occasioned by
exceptional rulings of the Coart; and
at last we were gravely told that there
did not remain of the form time
enough to hear and determine a mo
tion for injunction.
Before the commencement of the
next term [as the Court has probably
anticipated J the Atlanta Convention
has done its work—Meade and Ruger
have disappeared from the scenes, aud
Bullock and his hungry horde, by
force of the bayonet, under the flimsy
veil of Constitutional reform, had be*
come “lords of the ascendant.” The
suit before the Court was not of a vin
dicative character—Jamages were not
sought against the defendants; but
only a riddance from their usurpations.
Of course it wouid have been folly to
pursue them after their abdication.
The causes could not have been press
ed against them.
Let it not be said that the object
aimed at by this litigation was aceom-
piished without tbe action of the Court.
Far from it. Had the Court pro
nounced the leconstruclioo acts un
constitutional, we would not only have
been delivered from Meade and Ruger,
but from tbo whole Atlantic Conven
tion. The existing Slate Government
would have been sustained; Bullock
would have remained iu the Ex
press Office, and the present derange
ment of oar finances, as well «a many
other evils, would wave been avoided..
When it is considered that the en~
foaceinent of tbe reconstruction acts;
then in progress, would inevitably
overthrow existing State constitutions^
and with them existing Slate govern
ments; that the Executive and Legis
lative Departments of the Federal
Governments were distinctly at issue,,
upon the constitutionality of those
acts, and that there was in the Su
preme Court a care pending and a no'
lion in that case, ready for a bearing,
which called for a judicial teilieineet
of that question, what can. excuse a-
refusal to hear it ? No more momen
tous question was ever submitted to-
that Court, If the allegations in the-
bill failed to give the Court jurisdic
tion, why not say 60 ?
If tLe Executive Department were,
wrong, and the Legislative Depart
ment right, on that great issue, why
not, by a solemn judgment, term in* to
tbe controversy, and give quiet to (btr
country ?
They said there did not remain of
the term time enough for tbe bearing
—but why uot ?
The term was not closed by legal
limitations, but by judicial disoretioo.
Were these, their Honors, weary—ex
hausted by their judicial labors? Ah!
let them contemplate the wearrneae of
spirit, the exhaustion of resources^
since inflicted npou tbe people of
Georgia by the misrule they were
called upon to arrest, but would not
even enquire into, and then jtmtify,
if we can, tbeir delinquency.
I entered that court with all. tfed
veneration for it inspired by « Mar
shall, a Taney and tbeir Compeers. I
left it with painful impression, which
time has not mitigated, that the then
incumbents (or a majority of them)
had, by procrastination, deliberately
evaded a judgment they could not
have refused, without dishonor L*
tbemselves, yet could not have render- —■ - 1
ed without offebse to the despotic arid
menacing faction then and still wield'
ing tbe power of tbe Government.
It was probably under ihe promptitie
of a similar feeling that the venerable
J nstice Grier, the senior in years of
them all,- about the same time; from
his seat on tbe Bench, in open eeSnoif,
declared himself ashamed Of the atti
tude assumed by the Court )in anoth
er case resulting froiti posWyVreuriy),
and like an olo Roman, shook the re
proach from his skiria;
Here 1 tarn aside to notice a rumor,
invented and circulated to toy preju
dice. by certain mendacious Radicals
of Georgia—that in these soiM I bad,
without authority of law, feXpObded
thirty thousand dollars of the people’s
money. The expense of the first
suit, instituted and ended whilst I waa
still undisputed Goverudr of Georgia,
amounted in all (htefdding lawyer’s
fees, Court costs and printing expens
es) to two thousand seven bandied
dollars [$2,?00,
This sum I psh^ont of tbe contin
gent fund, placed.*at my disposal; a
ballance of which' remaioed unexpen
ded on my retirement. That the pas
sage of the reconstruction aet% and
[COyiLUDEft OS KWrXTRFAGX.]