■i . assa; : ■ — : r*i : : ; ~ . ; . • -. ’ • ~ - r •'C " . -.; - -• r
The G-eorgia, "Weekly Telegretph. and Jonrnal &p Messenger
In
Telegraph and Messenger
MACON. FEBROAKY 21, 1871.
C TIicKcwfi.
• Noon’s advices, yesterday from France
State that tho Beds are thorougldy beaten in the
Assembly. A Herald correspondent pronounces
the indications strongly in favor of a revival of
tho Orleans dynasty, while the World quotes
from Favre as expressing the opinion that
Conservative Republican Government will
inaugurated. A good idea is that of tho i
moval of the seat of government from Paris.
Great apprehensions aro felt about tho result
of the Gorman triumphal march through Paris
on Sunday next.
Tho London Times reports that the German
peaco terms are comparatively moderate.
Admiral Lee arrived at Key West yesterday,
had hoard nothing about the Tennessee,
did not doubt ehe was all right.
Bowen, the Congressional bigamist, escaped
conviction yesterday in Washington by one dis
senting juror.
Tlie Tennessee.
A Washington correspondent of the Jonrnal
of Commerce states that Gen. Sherman says
tho Tennessee was bnilt cut sharp at tho bow,
and plated to bo nsed as a ram. She had heavy
engines and sat well down in the water. But
tho heavy engines were taken out and light
ones put in, and when that was done she stood
above tho mark of steadiness in tho water,
other words, she was top heavy, and the
gincs were too light for tho vessel. As sho
had a very light load on this trip, tho effect
in a heavy sea can easily be imagined.
Now, if wo add to that the statement of Han-
scom, Chief Naval Constructor at Brooklyn,
that besides taking out four boilers and putting
on lighter engines, Admiral Porter added a spar
deck, and raised her coal bunks and other heavy
armament, wo have, altogether, such a disturb
ance of tho centre of gravity that it would be
no wonder if the Tennessee capsized in the first
heavy sea. Moreover, to add to these facts, she
is reported to have been full ship-rigged—im
plying necessarily great height and weight of
mast and spar, which would vastly increase her
danger. If these be the facts, it will it
not bo surprising to learn that slie wa3 thrown
on hor beam ends and foundered tho first day
out, and if nothing be ever heard from her
something like that will bo tho popular solution
of her fate. But if she shonld get to Domingo,
the next question will be, can she 6ver get
back ? ^
Something About ‘•Onirta.”
A correspondent of the Savannah News who
has recently returned from England, furnishes
that papor with somo information concerning the
author, whose novels written over the above nom
de plume, have had such extensive sale, and
about whose merits there is so much diverse
opinion. Tho writer called on Miss De La Ra-
nie—her real name—at Langham’s Hotel, Lon
don, and found her “exquisitely attired in a
summer toilette of blue and white—very fair,
about forty years of age, slender, graceful, rath-
or below the medium height, a sweet, intellect
ual face and melodious voice, xnannerssingular-
ly fascinating and refined; in a few words, the
very bean-ideal of a gentle, refined, highly cul
tivated, fascinating and intellectual woman.”
She was enthusiastic in her praises of the Sonth
and its people, asserting that “the Southerners
are the true aristocrats of the earth.” She
spoke in terms of hearty admiration of General
Breckenridge, whom she had met, and demon
strated, in divers other ways, her “rebellions”
instincts. ^
Congress Chartering Kail Roads
through the States.
A correspondent leaves a memorandum on
our desk wanting our opinion about the right
of Congress to charter Bail ways through tho
States as asked for and proposed in the case of
the Cincinnati Southern Road. Wo expressed
onr views on that point briefly a few days ago.
Congress hng the same power to confer the right
of way throngh a State thatithasthroughFrance
or Great Britain, and that is—none at all. But,
nevertheless, Congress proposes to assume that
power in several cases—(the air-line road to
New York is another of them)—and wo have
• little doubt will do it in the Kentucky case.
Tho ilacon Connection and the Sonth
Carolina Railroad.
Under this head, the Charleston Courier, of
Tuesday, says:
The annual meeting of the stockholders of
the Sonth Carolina Bailroad Company will con
vene to-day at 11 o’clock. The meeting is one
of great importance. The people of the State,
and especially of the city of Charleston, cannot
be too deeply interested in the prosperity and
welfare of a road, which is the great connecting
line with the arteries which supply it with trade
and the elements of commerce. It is a public
enterprise created for the benefit of the State,
and in which, therefore, every individual has a
deep concern.
Abont three thousand shares in the road aro
owned by the citizens of Macon. Georgia, and
of whom Mr. W. L. Ellis, of the firm of Ellis &
Brother, is the representative, and attends the
meeting on their behalf. It is probably, next
to tho city of Charleston, the largest number of
shares owned by the inhabitants of any city.
The Macon and Augusta Hoad was finished oir
the first of January, and promises to he a vain-
able auxiliary to the South Carolina Boaa. it
opens up a large and important trade to this sec
tion, which it is important to secure. For this
there will doubtless bo competition. It is esti
mated that there will, with the proper means
taken, bo abont five hundred thousand bales of
cotton per annum pass over this road, which,
with the proper connections made, will enure
to tho benefit of the South Carolina Bailroad,
and, therefore, to the city.
Macon is surrounded by a growing country
which mnst yield a large and increasing revenue.
This route fonns the shortest and most desira
ble way, via Charleston to New York, and North
ern markets for products. The citizens of Ma
con, regard it of importance in order to build
up this trade, and foster this connection, and on
account of the large amount of stock held by
them in tho South Carolina Bailroad, that they
should bo entitled to a representation in the
Board. This claim is worthy of consideration,
and ns such we commend it to tho attention of
the stockholders.
How tUo Codfish Quarrel Re-opened
—Diplomacy outlie Alabama Ques
tion.
In an article of some length the Journal of
Commerco explains how certain politicians,
much against their will, have ro-opened diplo
macy upon the Alabama claims, in their effort
to feed the flames of the war-spirit by liberal
contributions of Canada codfish oiL The fate
of a few trespassers upon tho maritime juris
diction of Canada could never have awakened
much concern in the United States; and the
English Government, in fact, attached no im
portance, whatever, to tho vindication of tho
rights claimed by Canada..
Butler, however, representing a fishing con
stituency, naturally thundered in his own in
terests. Tho codfish question to him was a
special and momentous buncombe. Accord
ingly, he flamed in speech and press. He was
able, not only to singe the British Lion, but
also to manipulate Grant into a flaming mani
festo in his last annual message—wherein the
codfish question takes the lead as a grand in
ternational dispate of tho first importance,
while tho Alabama question is disposed of in a
few lines.
Meanwhile, there was a deadlock in tho Ala
bama negotiations. A liberal treaty, proposed
and sanctioned by Great Britain, had been igno-
minionsly rejected by the Senate, and it de
volved upon tho United States to re-open tho
negotiations, if she intended to settle tho ques
tion peaceably. But just here the domestic
trouble began. The Radical party was all at
sea upon what they would demand—what it was
safe to demand, if they meant peace, and what
it was proper to demand if they intend to go
before the country on tho question of war. ,
Moreover,. it was in dispute whether they
wanted war or not, and whether a war would
work, as believed, in the radical party interests.
Some wanted it and some did not. Some be
lieved, with Butler, that the party could not be
saved without war—some said war would not
save it, and a few did not care to save it at that
exorbitant and felonious price.
In this condition of things, tho Cabinet had
stood on tho policy of non-action till-it could no
longer stand there with credit—somo movement
most bo made. Motley was therefore recalled
and Schenck appointed to go the Court of St.
James, bearing tho new programme, whatever
that might be—but what it was to be, that was
the puzzle.
In this condition of affairs, which we have
sketched independently of the Jonmals’ article,
and for which we do not desire it shall be held re
sponsible, let ns see from the Journal of Com
merce, how Butler’s libation of codfish oil to
the flames of war has been cunningly nsed by
the British diplomatists in tho interests of
peace. It has been snatched from the Are and
thrown upon the waters ol strife. Says the
Journal:
Those of us who read the English journals
were well aware that England cared bnt lit
tle for the monopoly by the dominion of the
fisheries, and would cheerfully throw them open
to Gen. Butler’s constituents rather than have a
fuss abont it. But, seeing how mnch ado the
President choso to mako in the matter, tho
Gladstone Cabinet shrewdly decided to join
the President in magnifying it into a vast con
cern, and rendering its adjustment the business
of an extraordinary commission. Their idea
was, and is, to grant the most liberal conces
sions on the fishery question, in order to get
easier terms in tho Alabama negotiations. Such
at least aro tho probabilities of the case. If
so, the President overshot the mark in his mes
sage. After attaching so great importance to
the removal or modification of tho Canadian
fishing restrictions, ho cannot with consistency
belittle it; bnt must admit that the giving way
of England on this point (where sho was never
at all tenacious), entitles her to a considerably
reduced bill of damages for losses by tho Al
abama.
In another respect the raising of the question
by tho President, gave England a great diplo
matic advantage. It enabled her to feel tho
way to settling the Alabama claims without a
Ions of her self-respect, which would in Engiicfc
opinion hnv« boon fuireiiea iiad she first pro
posed a commission at Washington to sit on the
Alabama controversy alone. It was morally
certain that, when Sir Edward Thornton opened
the subject of a fishery commission, this gov
ernment would ring in the Alabama claims os a
kindred subject to be settled by the same au
thorities. And thus it is, we say, that the pro
posal to reopen the Alabama dispute comes from
us at last and not from England; and she has
imported a new item in to tho general question,
namely the fishery difficulty, by gracefully yield
ing upon which she can hardly fail to procure a
reduction of the grand total.
We learn from a well informed American gen
tleman abroad, who has sounded members of
the Gladstone Cabinet, that other odds and ends
of more or Ies3 value will bo thrown in by Eng
land to lighten her payments in cash. Tho San
Juan question is one that will doubtless be re
vived in this connection; and also tho naviga
tion of the St. Lawrenco; and the rectification
of certain Northwestern boundaries; on all of
which points English diplomacy will be complai
sant to a degree. If, as a net result of all the
transactions, thi9 country makes anything like
as good terms (cash or tangibly valuable), as
she would have made on the basis of the John-
son-Clarendon treaty, we shall be pleasantly dis
appointed.
Having thus shown that England enters upon
tho commission with advantages of various
kinds which she did not have before, we yet do
not grudge them to her. The Alabama claims
ought to be settled as soon as possible, and so
ought every question at issue between the two
nations. It has been for the interest of a few
politicians to keep open the disputes between
the United States and England, and wo imagine
that some of them are now deploring the pros
pect of a perfect reconciliation. Bnt commerce,
peaceful industries, and all considerations of
well being, demand the obliteration of the last
rotioi.D.1 cause of quarrel: nnd wo earnestly
hope that tho commission will not adjourn until
that great work has boon accomplished.
Is Trouble.—The letter-writers say the claim
ants under the Alabama spoliations are in a
peck of trouble lest their claims shonld be set
tled with the government of the United States,
tvhich bas proved itself a very unfaithful col
lecting agent. In tho treaty made during Jack-
aon’s administration with France the govern
ment collected from Franco twenty millions in
demnify, for spoliations and losses suffered by
Amorican ships daring tho wars of the first Na
poleon; and of those twenty millions the gov
ernment has yet to pay ont tho first cent to tho
sufferers. They apprehend the claimants un
der the Alabama spoliations will meet with the
somo fate.
The First Game Bagged.—The Legislature
of Mississippi set a trap to catch tho Ku-klux,
and the firat game bagged was a “trooly loll”
Radical negro schoolmaster of Meridian, named
Price. Disguised, with eight or ten others, he
dragged an old negro from his house and nearly
beat him to dnath.
A corpulent wife in Cincinnati appears over
anxious to hasten tho permanent absence of her
invalid bnt absurdly tenacious of lifo husband.
She bad prepared for him, and occasionally airs
in his presence, the neat suit in which his corpao
will be dressed “if I shonld be so fortunate as
of lose you, my dear.”
Carious Telegraphic Feat.
Tho Richmond Dispatch records tho most
singular achievements by the telegraph of which
we have ever heard:
A gentleman suddenly became ill of pneu
monia in Washington City. His physician, a
gentleman of great attainments and fame, Re
sided in New York, and he was anxious that
this physician should bo consulted abont his
. A telegraph wire was by bis direction
taken into his room, and the New York doctor
being summoned to the telegraph office there,
the Washington physician attending the patient
informed him of the state of the case, and even
enabled him to fed his patient's pulse by caus
ing the wire to vibrate as the pulse did. Tbe
case thns being thoroughly diagnosed in New
York, the necessary prescriptions were sent
thence to Washington. The attack, though vi
olent, soon yielded to the treatment, and tho
datient is now a veiy cheerful convalescent.
The Southern Lite Insurance Company.—
Mr. Jos. B. Randall, whose retiremont from the
editorial control of tho Augusta Constitutional
ist has already been announced, is now in
Charleston as the special agent of the Southern
Life Insurance Company. This company is
already well known, nnd its officers and agents
speak in the highest terms of tho progress it has
maoe.' This at least is certain—tho officers and
agents of the company are gentlemen of high
character and position, and weigh well every
statement they mako. Mr. Randall will doubt
less bo as successful in his new profession as he
was in the editorial chair, and will find new op
portunities of serving tno people who remember
him with affectionate .respect. From the
Cameo Bracelet” and “My Maryland” to a
life - insurance agency is avast change. The war
poet of the Sonth now makes policy the study of
his life. We invite attention to tho communi
cation of tho general agents of the company, to
bo found on the fourth page of this issue.-
A Sexegambian, arrested in Philadelphia, -had
four chickens in his carpet-bag. He said “de
man dat put urn dar was no fren” of his. KJ# „''
THE GEORGIA PRESS.
The factories at Columbus were compelled to
suspend work Tuesday on account of high water.
The Columbus Sun soys the effect of tho late
rains in that section is giving a heavy backset
to work on plantations. Few had jnoro than
organized their force when tho rain set in, since
which the rains have boon so incessant that
little in the way of preparations for tho crop
could be done.
Tho steamship Saragossa, which arrived at
Savannah Tuesday afternoon, encountered a
tremendous hurricane last Sunday off Capo
Lookout, losing her mainmast, rigging and sails
and one seaman, (Charles An drews,), who was
thrown into tho water and drowned.
A Savannah merchant was in Columbus Sat
urday offering to bet $5,000 that the receipts at
the United States ports for this cotton week,
which ends to night, would amount to 185,-
000 bales. A* gentleman of the city has been
hunting for him to take the bet, and was disap
pointed when he found he was gone.
The Sparta Times and Planter says guano
meets, with a very slow sale in Hancock. There
are abont eleven agents in Sparta, and it is the
opinion of “a farmer” that one ton to tho agent
will be tho maximum of the amount sold for the
present season.
The Savannah News says:
Colored • Georgians. — The question has
arisen in the minds of tho colored people of
Savannah as to whether they aro competent to fill
publio offices or not. Even colored carpet-bag
gers are preferred over native negroes. For
instance, Toomer and Arison, in tbe Post Office,
and Porter in tho Custom House, are natives of
Sonth Carlina; and White, ex-Clerk of the Sup
erior Court, but now Assistant Appraiser under
Bobb, is a native of Ohio. It is strange that
the great intellectual qualifications of the darkey
Rads of Savannah are thus ignored. “Why is
this thus ?” Whore are the African Ku-Klux ?
The following record of land sales at Sparta,
last Tuesday, is furnished by the Times and
Planter. Tho lota sold are eight miles west
from Sparta:
Gray lot, 6 acres, $8 20 per acre; Jenkins
lot, 4 acres, $19 00 per acre; Cady lof, 4 acres,
$82 20 per acre; lot No. 4, 297 acres; $8 00 per
acre; lot No. 5, 320.4 acres, $12 95 per acre;
lot No. 9,173 acres, $9 13 per acre.
Levi Genterfeit and Thomas Stuart have been
held to bail in the sum of $1000 eaoh, in
Lowndes county, for placing obstructions on
tho Atlantic and Guif Railroad.
Valdosta is soon to have a fire engine.
Gen. Robert Toombs will deliver a lecture on
the “Magna Charts, ” in Atlanta, in the course
of two or three weeks.
J. L. Wilson, Ordinary of Do Kolb county,
died of consumption, Wednesday night...
Tho valuable mining property of the Georgia
Company, in Lumpkin county, was sold at
Sheriff sale, last Tuesday, for $11,000. S. L.
M. Barlow, of New York city, was the purchaser.
John Olardy of White county was killed last
Tuesday by fallingover a bluff twenty feet high.
Drunk.
Tlie Iniprove«I I’snlms.
From a review in the Sanday World of Dr.
Conant’s new version of the Book of Psalms,
we take tho following:
Tho Psalms were originally sung in publio
worship by alternato choirs, who responded to
qach other from different parts of the temple.
Sometimes they echoed back the some senti
ments in other words; sometimes tho response
was a contrast in the sentiment with a strict ro>
semblance in tho structure of the language
sometimes it consisted in mere similarity of
poetical form which carried on, instead of mere
ly echoing, the sense. We have no space to
trace the structure of the Hebrew verso through
all these peculiarities, and will merely give one
or two illustrations of its simplest form. It
was regnlar strophe and and anti-strophe be
tween alternate choirs. We will take an exam
ple where the same sentiment is repeated, using
the common version of a familiar psalm:
Fisrt Choir: The heavens declare tho glory of
God;
Beconu Chois (responding): And the firmament
ehowetb his handiwork.
Wiacr Ohoxev : Day unto day nttoreth speech;
Second Chois : And night onto night showeth
knowledge.
Fisst Chois; There is no speech nor language
where their voice is not heard;
Second Chois : Their lino is gone out through
all the earth, and their words to tho end of the
world.
What would seem to a cool literary critic
reading the common version without any other
knowledge as mere tautology and tasteless rep
etition, becomes, when properly understood, a
curious illustration of the forms of Hebrew
worship and of the structure of Hebrew poetry;
all of which is completely obscured by the or
dinary translation. We will farther illustrate
tho absurdity of tho common version of tho po
etical parts of tho Bible, by taking a few lines
from Shakespeare and printing them in arbitra
ry verso like those which chop np and confuse
the English scriptures:
1. Livo, Brutus,.live! live! Bring liim with tri
umph home onto his house.
2. Give him a statue with his ancestors; lot him
be Caesar.
3. Cicsar’s better parts shall now be crowned in
Brutus; we’ll bring him to his house with shouts
and clamors.
Who could recognize, when transformed into
this biblical disguise, tbe spirited dialogue which
we will now restore:
Citizens. Livo, Bratus, live! live!
1. Citizen. Bring him with triumph homo unto his
house.
2 Citizen. Give him a statue with his ancestors.
3 Citizen. Let him be Ctcssr.
4 Citizen. Cmsar’s better parts
Shall now be crowned in BrntuB.
1 Citizen. We’ll bring him to his house with shouts
and clamors.
BY TELEGEAPH.
.Wo now proceed to give a pretty close paral
lel taken from the Psalms. The following are
tho last verses of Psalm cxxxv., taken from tho
common translation:
19. Bless the Lord, O house of Israel; bless the
Lord; O house of Aaron;
20. Bless tho Lord, O house of Levi; ye that fear
the Lord, bless tbe Lord.
21. Blessed be the Lord out of Zion, which dwell-
eth at Jerusalem. Praise ye the Lord.
Prejudice and devotional associations apart,
this is tasteless and wearisomereiteration. Now
witness the transforming effect of putting it in
its proper.form! -It is the conolosion or dox-
ology of a very striking hymn used in the sor-
Trice of the temple at Jerusalem, while that
worship was maintained in its pristine and im
posing magnificence. Imagine the high Priest,
the Priests, the Levites present in their robes,
together with tho congregation, all arranged in
due order,' and alternately chanting or singing
with instrumental accompaniments. We use
Dr. Conant’s translation, taking the dramatic
costume, so to speak, from an appendix to
Lowth: . .
High Priest and Priests to the Congregation :
House of Israel, bless ye Jehovah;
Congregation to the High Priest and Priests :
House of Aaron, bless ye Jehovah;
High Priest and Priests to the Levites: House
of Levi, bless ye Jehovah;
Levites to the High Priests and Priests : Ye
that fear Jehovah, bless Jehovah.
Priests, Levites, and Congregation all to
gether, in full chores : Blessed he Jehovah out
of Zion, who inhabits Jerusalem.
Full chorus continued, each division in turn
addressing the'other two : Praise ye Jah!
How insipid and spiritless is tho common
version in comparison with this. Dr. Conant,
as a mere translator, had to omit the vivifying
scenery and surroundings; bnt pray observe
now much better his veraion-corresponds with
them!
Beecher on Religions Reserve.
The Sun of Saturday says that in Mr. Boooh-
er’s lecture in Plymouth Church, the evening
previous, upon “Religions Reserve,” he said
that he was of opinion that a certain amount of
air and atmosphere was good for the soul, yet
he did not hold with those religionists who
would forcibly intrude upon a person’s con
science. If a man came up to him and, slap
ping him on the shoulder, demanded, “Brother
Beecher, how is your soul?” he would answer,
“None of yonr business! ” [Laughter.]
Mild persuasion was the only means of reach
ing a man’s inner self. With a sudden burst of
eloquence, Mr. Beecher exclaimed, “Round
came tho north wind, and swept down upon the
rosebud, saying, ‘Give me a kiss.’ But the rose
bud answered *No 1’ Round came the east wind
and swept down upon the rosebud, saying, ‘Give
me a kiss.’ But .the rosebud answered ‘No!’
Then came the south wind, blowing mildly and
lovingly, and the rosebud kissed it.”
Washington, February 1G.—It is stated that
tho Madrid Govomment will postpone the elec-,
tioninCuba. The Belgian militia who guard
ing the frontier have been disbanded.
A Herald special from Bordeaux, dated the
15tb, says .the Deputies manifestly intend to
overthrow the violent Republicans and remove
tho capital from Paris in order to shield tho
Government from the mob. A personal con
versation with the Deputies induces tho belief
that a temporary provisional government will
be first established. Thiers,- Grevey, Trochu,
Delscluz and Dorron are favorably mentioned
and in connection with prominent citizens in
the provinces will certainly bo placed in power
Tho Radicals are making a desperate struggle,
but the cries for the continnenoe of tho war and
no surrender, havo evidently lost force. The
Conservatives aro confident that there is a strong
under current in favor of tho Orleamsts. The
election of the Orleans Princes to tho Assembly
is likely to bo declared valid.
A World’s special from Paris, dated tho 15tb,
states that Favre says the elections have evinced
an unexpected reaction against tho Republicans.
The country is alarmed at tho action of tho
Radicals, who played into the hands of tho
Monarchists. It is .not probable that the Or-
leanists will bo successful. They aro too wise and
prudent to involve tho country in war. A Re
public will unavoidably be adopted.
Versailles, February 16.—Tho surrender of
arms by tho Paris garrison has boon completed
The prudent of all parties aro apprehensive
abont tho triumphal march of the Germans
throngh Paris. A single pistol shot fired by
some insane fanatic might result in fearful
consequence.
Washington, February 1G. - The Bowen jury
was discharged. It stood eleven for conviction
and one for acquittal.
In the Senate last night Trumbull from tjje
Judiciary Committee reported adversely to tho
supplemental civil rights bill from tho House.
Tho House last night did nothing.
London, February 16.—A special correspon
dent of tho London Times at Berlin telegraphs
that Bismarck’s -terms of peaco aro compara
tively moderate.
Washington,.February 1G.—Admiral Lee has
reached Key West, and telegraphs tho Secretary
of tho Navy that ho has no news of tho Tennes
see and don’t expect any until the last of tho
month, when the Tybee returns, Leo haB no
doubt that the Tennessee is all right.
Washington, February 16.—Nearly all the
windows on the avenno aro engaged. All res
ervations on tho avenue aro equipped with seats
for tho accommodation of spectators. A largo
force is engaged in putting the avenue in con
dition for tho- carnival. Preparations for the
masquerade at the National Theatre promises a
brilliant result.
Bowen has been arrested on another charge
of bigaroy, at tho instance of Frances Hicks,
whom the charge alleges ho married in Augusta,
Ga., in 1852.
The commandant of Fort Dodge, Kansas, tel
egraphs tho Secretary of War his apprehension
of the renewal of Indian attacks on the frontier
settlements.
Judge Wylie, in discharging tho Bowen jury,
said that if the prosocution failed .to- obtain a
verdict on that evidenco, he did not think they
wonld over have a -verdict. Ho said that one
bribed juror was more than a match for his
eleven fellows, bnt ho did not mean to insinu
ate that thero was a bribed jnror on this panel.
He did not see how a juror could hesitate for a
moment on finding a verdict in a case like this,
and he thought that the evidence of two wit
nesses, who testified to their own infamy,
should not have mnch weight. A wretch of
that kind ought not to be believed.
The Committee on Reconstruction ordered
tho Chairman to report a bill ropealing tbe test
oath according to tho President’s recommend
ation. There were two negative votes, Chas.
H. Porter and Hamilton Ward. The committee
also reported, bnt had recommitted with the
privilege to print Cobb’s bill creating a Ku-Klux
Commissioner in each county of States lately in
insurrection and Kentucky. The bill gives the
Commissioner extraordinary judicial powers.
He can Call posse, comitatus or militia, or tho
nearest army or naval forces to serve his pro
now elections for delegates to the National As
sembly will bo necessary in this city.
Cresson, Prefect of Police, has resigned.
The authorities have fixod tho price of bread
at 50 centimes per kilo.
The Journal des Debats says Thier3i3 uni
versally regarded as the future President of
France, with Favre, Picard and Buffet in tho
ministry.
Bordeaux, February 16.—M. Grevy has beoD
elected President of the Assembly.
London, February 1ft—The Queen of Spain
is atNioo, en route to Madrid.
It is asserted that the husband of- ex-Queen
Isabella has offered to swear allegiance to Ama
deus. *
Chableston, February 16.—Sailed—Steamer
Cuba, Baltimore; steamer South Carolina,
Now York; bark Rio do Laplata, Amsterdam;
bark Walter, Liverpool; schooner Fawn, Bos
on.
Sanannah, February 1G.—Cleared—Steam
ship General Barnes, New York; Saragossa,
Baltimore; schooners Traveller, Charleston;
Jas. A. Brown, Gienfuegos.
Liverpool, February 16.—Arrived, Sabine,
from Galveston; China, from New Orleans;
Eblana, from Mobile; Foerloss, from Savannah;
Elizabeth and Belgravia, from New Orleans;
Sidney, from Charleston; Talisman and Gib
son, from Mobile; Groat Western, froin Now
York. -
Senate.—A veto bill relieving certain naval
contractors was sustained by a vote of 57 to 2.
Paul submitted several affidavits attesting the
signatures to tho petitlonagainsl tho removal of
Gov. Vance’s disabilities. A appropriations
wero discussed to adjournment.
House.—Wheeler, Chairman of tho Commit
tee on tho Facifio Railroad, gave notice that he
would on Tuesday call up tho Southern Pacific
railroad.
Tho West Point case was resumed. Resolu
tions wero finally adopted as reported by tho
Committee on Military Affairs. It restores tho
three deserters and orders a court of inquiry.
A bill for tho safety of travelers carried by
steam was taken np, It contains 71 sections
and covers 55 printed pages. It establishes
regulations to guard against' fire, leaking, ex
plosions and other accidents. ■ Passed. It goes
to tbe Senate.
Tho House adjourned.
Boston, February 15.—Tho Legislature Com
mittee on Federal Relations have reported on the
Fisheries question that tho recent Legislation
of tbe Canadian Dominion on tho fisheries on
tho North-east coast as an arbitrary and un
friendly action on the part of the authorities
there towards our citizens engaged in that pur
suit, and constitutes a grievance which demands
attention and protection of tho General Govern*
ment and it is of great moment that negotia
tions abont to take place between England and
tho United States should re-establish in a clear
manner the rights of onr citizens on the fishing
grounds shonld reserve to them such privileges
tho present state of the fisheries make
reasonable and right, and provide indemnify for
any nnjust seizures' that have been made.
New York, February 16.—Tho total Frenoh
subscription to date is $77,630.
Tho damages awarded against the Canard
steamer Russia for tho sinking of .the Italian
brig “Figdia Maziori” two years ago aro $150-
000. .* .
Richmond, February 1G.—Tho Mechanics’
Cotton Mill at Swift Creek, near Petersburg,
was totally destroyed by fire last night. Loss,
$70,000; insured for $5G,000.
Louisville, February 16.—Tho first number
of tho Ledger, a new Democratic paper, ap
peared this morning.
New Orleans, February 16.—In the Legis
lature a special committee from the Houso was
appointed to investigate the affairs of the
Slaughter House Company, reported that the
Company had forfeited their charter, and re
ported a bill to that effect, which passed by a
vote of 90 to 4. This bill authorizes any ono
to slaughter anyanimals at or bolow tho slaugh
ter house either side of the river for tho city
market. .
St. Louis, February 16.—A special to the
Republican says nearly a square of Helena, Ar
kansas, was destroyed by fire. Loss $82,000.
London, February 16.—In consequence of
certain preparations in the south of Franco for
calling into service tho military class of 1871,
Bismark will consent to prolong the armistice
five days only. Tho capitulation of Belfort has
been signed and the garrison has boen with
drawn with arms and baggage.
Paris, February 1G.—It is now reported that
Decision of tlie Supreme Court ’of
Georgia.
Delivered at Atlanta, Tuesday, Fob. 14,1871.
From the Atlanta Constitution.']
Thomas B. Rains vs. Charles Dunning and
Jas. Suggs. Injunction-from Randolph.
McOay, J.—Where A., holding an execution
against B., caused his land to be levied upon,
and before tho sale, it was agreed between them
that B. shonld sell to A. tho lands in satisfac
tion of tho judgment-, which was shortly after
wards done, B. making a deed, and A. satisfy
ing tho judgment, and it subsequently appeared
that, after the contract was made, but before it
was consummated by writing and signature, O.
had purchased from B. tho timber upon a largo
portion of the land, with fall notice of the
agreement betweon A. and 15!, and had . taken
a deed from B, past dated, so as to go behind
A.’s judgement against B., with intent to de
fraud A., and permitted A., without notice, to
go on and perfect his agreement with B., in ig
norance of the sale of tho timber.
Held, That this was a fraud upon A., and a
bill to cancel the deed conveying tho timber to
O.; and to enjoin bim from catting the timber
is not demurrable for want of equity.
Judgment reversed.
B. 8. WorriU, for plaintiff in error.
Hood & Kiddoo, by Moses & Downing for
defendant.
Blanford & Braun, for .use of John T. Clark,
vs. H. G. Feagin, Sheriff. Rule vs. Sheriff,
from Stewart.
MoOay, J.—A return by tho Sheriff upon a
fi. fa. that he bas “received of the defendant
$9.25 in full of tho costs oh this fi. fa.,” is such
a return or entry as, under section of tho
Revised Code, will prevent the dormacy of tho
judgment.
Judgment-reversed.
John T. Clark, for plaintiff in error.
E. H. WorriU, for defendant.
James D. Leonard vs. W. F. PoweU, trustee.
Assumpsit and motion for new trial from Ran
dolph.
MoOay. J.—1. A trust estato is ordinarily
liable for necessaries for its protection and
preservation and, to the extent of the income,
for necessaries for tho use of the beneficiaries
who are in want, unless tho trust deed other
wise provide, but it is not error in the Court
to refuse to give this principle of law in charge
to a jury, in a case which turns whoUy on an
oUeged express contract with the trustee, and
there is no evidenco from which the implied
liability of the trust estate can be lawfully as
sumed.
2d. Where there was a trust estate in Ran
dolph county, in the possession of a trustee, for
the wife of A, and A with his family lived on a
farm in Early county, and articles were furn
ished to A and nsed by him in the support of
his wifo and family, the law wiU not presume
that tho wifo of A is in want, and charge her
trust estate in Randolph with the artioles sim
ply because it is proven that the trustee has not
supplied her.
Judgment affirmed.
H. Fielder, for plaintiff in error.
L. S. Chastain, B. S. WorreU, for defendant.
A. E. Marble vs. Robt L. Lanoy. Certiorari
from Muscogee.
MoOay, J.—When a Justice of tho Peace com
mits an error of law in a matter material to the
issne before him, as if he takes jurisdiction of
a claim of more than ono hundred dollars, and
a certiorari is applied for, and all the require
ments of tho law in reference to a certiorari are
complied with, it is error in tho Judge of tho
Superior Court to refuse tho writ of certiorari.
Judgement reversed.
I. F. Gerrard, for plaintiff in error.
No appearance for defendant.
tinoal desertion of tho wifo for tho term of three
yo irs;
Held, That the husband was a competent wit
ness on the trial thereof, under tho provisions
of the 3,795th seotion of tho Codo; bnt he
conld not testify as to any facts derived by him
from the confidential relation of husband and
wifo.
Judgment reversed.
Moses & Downing, C. R. Russel for plaintiff
in error. • .
No appearance for defendant.
M. T. Hickson vs. Qeo. H. Bryan. Home
stead from Harris.
Warner, J.—Whoro H died intestate, leaving
a widow as his solo heir at law, who eleoted to
take hor dower in the lands of her deceased hus
band, and afterwards applied for a homestead
ont of the other lands of her deceasd husband:
Held, That, after electing to take her dower,
she was not entitled to a homestead out of the
other lands of which her husband died seized
and possessed.!
Judgment affirmed.
Ramsey & Ramsey, H. L. Banning for plain-
iff.
Jas. M. Mobley, E. H. WorriU for defendant.
Felix McCardle vs. N. ■ J. Fogarty. Certiorari,
from Museogeo.
Wabneb, . J.—A petition for a wnt of certiorari
presented to tho Judge of the Superior Court
for tho correction of errors in law, alleged to
havo' been committed on tho trial of a case in a
Justice’s Court, under tho provisions of tho
Code, and tho Judge refused to sanction tho
same:
Hdd That the errors complained of in tho
petition for ccrtioriari were sufficient in law to
have authorized the Jndge to have sanctioned
the certiorari and that it was error to refuse to
do so.
Judgment reversed.
Moses & Downing, for plaintiff in error.
No appearance for defendant.
i i7 ^. That the verdict was no ,
law as tho application of tho
turned npon the question of fart lr i ^
jufy wero properly to adjndce’ ^'*1^
Judgment affirmed-. K *
Pontiff in .
ant.
H. L. Benning, E. H. WorreU.
Ejs
Lochbane, C. J—Where in
ejectment for land, the contw. n a <*<*
the dividing line, aid the *222* *
in himself to tho lot, but not'fi, thoip 5^
from the State, and the
— boundary. SSSSfJN
and such witness discloses bv hi,
existence of such deed, and a
rule out tho evidence relativetoth»° a
the deed, was overruled and the
hm case, and the jury found foriil
with mesno profits:
Held, That the plaintiff had nnf
title as would aUow him to recover N
his evidence being no
State to him. 6 foas |
Held, furtlur, That while evident .
quiescence
this caso was competent evidence it ^
competent to go into the contents of tv ^
and on tho fact of tho existence of^ ^
from plaintiff to defendant being
the duty of tho Court to stop the
until.tho parties,'one or the othw^S
under such deed, prodneed it, and
ti°n of practice, .ho who claims &L J? 1 *
benefit arising under any instrument iJ J?'«
is the party whoso duty it is to nresJ?-
Court, and put it in evidence.. P c
Cubbedge & Hazolhurst vs. O. F. Adams.
In junction from Bibb. -
Wabneb, J.—A bill was filed by tho complain
ants, alleging that they wero bankers, brokers,
and partners, doing business in the city of Ma
con, and that tho defendant was indebted to
them by open account, in tbe sum of $9,308.97,
which indebtedness was created by advances
made by them to him of money at different
times, during the cotton season of 1869-70;
that tho credit was given to the defendant on
the faith of his representations to them that
he was able to protect them from loss, on ac
count of the advances made by them to him,
Where illegal testimony has heca
admitted by the Court, and the
not made out such caso as entitles uT,
cover upon his title:
err??’ ^ ‘° erant 8 ***
Judgment reversed.
Judgment reversed on the ground
court erred in not ruling out the testiZ*
Shields upon the objection made therein
E. L. Douglass, B. S. Worrill, f Qr
in error. ^
A. Hood, for defendant.
Benedict, Hall & Co., vs. B. F. Dav's. a,
plaint, from Stewart. ’
Loohbane, 0._J.—When on a suit upas
and that they had the right to behove, and did t troduction of tho d!aft, L said dJ
^ th ? ^Presentations and conduct; that it was payable at a certain tiiTarfS
of Iho defendant, that every dollars worth of j after date, and accepted by tbe party fervid
proper tywhiehho owned was pfodged as aeecur- wasdrawn and there was ho
ify for the paymentofany sum of monoy which ; trodueed, and the Court, on motion?2
ho might owe them. .Tho complainants also al-1 now su jt. > P*"*
ttat, at the close of tho cotton season of j md ^ order to render , h .
1869-.0, when they ciffied on tho defendant for \ the holder must present tho OrafUUhS
a settlement of his indebtedness, ho was not ^signated for payment, .-md gi vo noto^
prepared to settle or secure their debt; and, fnsalto the aSTwer, that notice is a
upon inquiry, they ascertained that thedefend-1 precedent to his liability, and must be ^
ant had made a voluntary conveyance of all tho . and proved and if ther e be anjthingin
property he-owned (with unimportant excep- j which tho plaintiff relies ondispeunigiS
tions) to his father-m-law, in trust, for the ben- present ation and notice, as that the to™*
efit of Ins wifo and cluldren-that-tho deed was ; no elIeot3 in tho haEd3 of tho d
executed on the 22d of September 1809 but was damaged, that must be averred .-xdpZT -
not recorded until the 8th of March, 18i0; that o,;*
Mary E. Shorter vs. Moore, Trimble & Co. Il
legality from Muscogee.
McCay, J.—Where thero was a judgment
against S., a garnishee, in a.suit in favof of T.
& Co. against H., and S., after tho judgment,
pays the money to a judgment in favor of B.
against H. of older date, than the judgment of
T. & Co. vs. H., S. having also been served
with suffimons of garnishment in B.’s suit vsl H.
Held, That this was a satisfaction of tho
judgment of T. & Co. vs. S., unless it be shown
that B.,’s judgment was not, in fact, tho oldest
lion, and that the whole question of the pay
ment, and which of the judgments was, in fact,
the oldest, may be inquired into on an affidavit
of illegality by S., settingup tho payment to
tho oldest judgment
Where the Judge of tho Superior Court re
quired tho affiant in an affidavit of illegality to
an execution, which affidavit was quite volumin
ous, to make a brief of the grounds taken in
tho shape of a motion, this was not such an er
ror as this court wiil correot it being mere mat
ter of praotioe, for tho convenient transaction
of the business of tho court, but in so doing,
if a material allegation in the affidavit is not
included in tho brief it is error in tho court to
reject evidence going to support it, and confine
the defendant to the brief.
Judgment reversed.
Chappel & Russel for plaintiff in error.
Peabody & Brannon for defendant. %
O. Faramore & Co. vs. .Woolfalk Walker.—
Motion for new trial from Muscogee. .
MoOay, J.—Where on a trial before a jury,
it was in issue whether a horse was sound at the
time of a sale, and there was evidence on both
sides upon the point, one of the witnesses say
ing ho was slightly lame and continued to grow
worse for a year, and after the trial a witness
was fonnd, who would swear that the horse was
not lamo at the sale', or for a long time thereaf
ter, when he got a hart whioh made him serious
ly lame.
Held,~That this wa3 only cumulative evidence,
and not a ground for new trial. In order to
justify a new trial on tho ground of newly dis-
covered evidence, it mnst appear that that the
newly discovered evidence is such as will prob
ably change the verdict.
Judgment affirmed.
Peabody & Brannon, for plaintiff in error.
Blanford & Thornton, for defendant.
John M. Hill administrator ,vs. George Bell.
Complaint from Terrell.
Warner, J.—An action was brought by the
plaintiff, as administrator, to reoover tho pos
session of a piano from tho defendant aB tho
property of his. intestate, and, npon the trial,
he failed to introduce his letters of administra
tion in evidence, or to prove the actual posses
sion of tho piano by him as such administrator,
before the commencement of the suit, although
thero was evidence that the piano had boen ap
praised as tho property of tho intestate: ~
Held, That tho plaintiff did not show such
evidence of title as would authorize him, as ad
ministrator, to reoover tho possession of the
piano from the defendant, who claimed to hold
it adversely to tho plaintiff’s intestate, and that
thero was no error in the Court below in grant
ing a nonsuit.
Judgment affirmed.
O. B. Wootten, by Hill & Candler, for plaintiff
in error. '
Hines & Hobbs, by Geo. Beall andR. H. Clark,
for defendant.
Thos. Gastello vs. Sophronia Gastello. ' Di
vorce, from Stewart.
Warner, J.—When an action for divorce was
brought by tho husband against bis wife, alleg
ing as a ground for divoroe the willful and con-
tho deed was made to defraud them and other
creditors, and that the deed was withheld from
the record by the defendant that ho might get
credit on the faith of tho property conveyed to
his family, that it was voluntary, without valua
ble consideration,.and made with intent to de
fraud creditors, and at a time when said defend
ant awarding to the best of complainants
knowledge and belief was insolvent, that the
defendant at the time of the execution of the
deed was indebted to them more than $7,900,
and without advising them of its exeention, con
tinued to do business with them until the close'
of the cotton season of 1869-70, and had no
means to pay or secure them, that Flanders
the original trustee named in tho deed, has
been discharged, and the defendant has been
substituted in his place as trostee under the
deed, that the defendant has sold some of
tho property, and has advertised somo of tho
other property for sale, that the defendant
has converted and used tho money arising
from tho sale of said property as if tho same
belonged absolutely to him, and that the
family of defendant, by his own admissions,
havo enjoyed the money Which he owes com
plainants, and that the property mentioned in
said deed is justly subject to the payment of
complainants debt, and that they have reason to
apprehend, and do seriously apprehend that the
defendant, unless restrained by the injunction
of the Court, will sell all of said property, and
convert tho proceeds to his own uso. The bill
prays that the defendant may be enjoined from
disposing of the property conveyed by said deed,
either in his own name, or as trustee. Tho i
Court granted an order calling npon tho defend
ant to show cause why tho injunction should not
issue as prayed for. The defendant appeared
before the Judge and filed his answer to the
complaint’s bill, in which he admits the making
of tho deed, but denies that it was made with
intent to defraud the complaints, and sets forth
his indebtedness to them at the time of its exe
cution, the amount of collaterals held by them
at that time, and tho amount of property then
held by him as well as the amount of his gene
ral indebtedness at the time of the exeention of
the deed. Several affidavits were filed by the
respective parties in support of, and in opposi
tion to, the granting of tho injunction. Tho
Judge in the Conrt below, after hearing tho
motion for.tho injunction, and considering the
bill, and answer of tho defendant, and the affi
davits on each side, and the argument of coun
sel thereon, refused the application of the in
junction, whereupon the complainants.excepted.
The complainants also excepted to the refusal
of the Jndgo to allow the complainants to file
exceptions to the defendant’s answer, so as to
reqoire him so answer more folly the allegations
in the bill, and also excepted to the refusal of
the Conrt to compel the defendant to be orally
examined as a witness by the complainants, on
the hearing of tho motion for injunction:
Held, That as a general role,- a court of equity
will not interfere at the instance of a general
creditor, before judgment, to set aside a volun
tary conveyance alleged to have been made for
the purpose of defrauding creditors, and restrain
by injunction tho' sale of property held by tho
debtor under that voluntary conveyance as trus
tee or in his own right, on the ground of fraud
when tho fraud alleged is the execution of such
voluntary conveyance without notice to the cred
itors.
Held, also, That tho original jurisdiction to
.grant, or refuse to grant or to continue, or re
fuse to continue an injunction in an equity
cause, is vested by tbe Constitution and the
laws of this State, in the Superior Courts, or in
the several Jndg03 thereof as regulated by law,
who may, in the .-performance of that duty so
devolved cn them, exercise a. sound discretion
as to the granting or refusing an injunction, ac
cording to tho circumstances of each case pre
sented for their consideration.
Held, further, That this Court has no orig
inal jurisdiction to grant or refuse an injunc
tion, bufr-is alone a court for'the correction of
errors from the Superior Courts and City Courts,
and unless it is manifestly apparent from the
record that tho Judge of the Superior Court has
abused tho discretion vested in him by law,
either in granting or refusing to grant an in
junction, thero is no error which this Conrt can
correct and that, according to tho facts as pre
sented by tho record in the case, there was not
such an abnso of that discretion which the law
has vested in the Judge of tho Court below, in
refusing to grant the injunction prayed for as
will authorize this Court to control it:
Held also, That, inasmuch as tho answer of
tho defendant was not filed under the order or
process of the Court requiring the defendant to
answer the complainant’s bill, bnt was volunta
rily filed by him by way of showing cause against
granting the injunction, it was to be considered
sy the Judge for what it was worth, in the shape
in which ho voluntarily chose to. present it, and
that the complainants did not have the' legal
right to complain of his action in regard to that
matter; nor did the Judge err in refusing to al
low the complainants to examine tho defendant
orally as a witness, on a motion to grant an in
junction.
Judgment affirmed.
Nisbets k Jackson, for plaintiffs in error.
Lanier & Anderson, for defendant.
without this tho caso is not prima fade
out against the drawer.
Judgment affirmed.
E. G. Raiford, by John Peabody, for pi»wg
in error.
J. L. Wimberly, by E. H. Beall, for defat
ant
C. B. Taliaferro vs. E. O. Pry. Horned
from Harris.
Lochbane, C. J.—Where a party rents ki
from another, and a distress warrant forreiti
levied for such rent and the wifo, by hats
friend, applies for exemption of personaltyc
der the Homestead Laws in the property sole
ied on for rent, and npon objections being fie
before the Ordinary, ho sustains the objection
and the case is appeoled to the Snperior C<c.
and the objections are demurred to, and
demurrer sustained, the objections showingth
fact that th.e distraint was for rent of the pq-
erfy:
Held, That tho landlord’s lien-on the propeij
was paramount, and the Court erred insss*i»
such demurrer to the objections filed in it
case. HBI
Judgment reversed, on the ground thsttSi
Court erred in sustaining the demurrer k ob
jections filed in this case.
Ramsey & Ramsey, by H. L. Bennh^'h
plaintiff.
James M. Mobley, E. H. Worrell, fordefui
ant.
Theophilus Sapp vs Felix McArdle, i2s£»
trator. Certiorari from Muscogee.
Lochbane, O. J.—Where summons of go
ishment is served upon an administrator btfa
the twelve months have expired:
Held, Under section 3498 of the Code of tb
State, such garnishment may be served c-
the provision of law which postpones his»
swer until he is enabled from the admini*
tion of the estate safely, to answer the sasce.
Held, That the effect of such gamishmeh
to retain, in the hands of the administrator; #
property finally to be ascertained and diga-
of by the Court on a review of all thepnris
and equities of existing claimant, under®
rules of law, and is not in conflict with the»
tion 2507 of the Code, prohibiting suit to»
cover a debt due by decedant until the eip
tion of twelve' months from his qaalificatiffi
Judgment reversed on the ground that«
Court erred in discharging the administrs-
from process of garnishment in this case.
Moses & Downing, for plaintiff in error.
N. L. Howard, for defendant.
Wm. Hawes, et al. vs. Elizabeth Paul, adsi
istratrix. Equity from Stewart.
Lochbane, C. J.—Where, on the trial o* 1 -
in equity in relation to the settlement of oop»-
nership transactions, the question in contra^
sy is the amount due on the books, and o: w
trial the defendant lays the foundations^
ciently in law for the admission of seconA
evidence of the extracts of the books, and ■
Court rejects tho testimony:
Held, That while questions of
are addressed to the Court, and in donbtfnk
of accessibility or diligence, this Court**
reluctant to interfere, yet whon the . eyl( "“jL
materially to the elucidation of questions tx-;
the jury, and the loss of the original is t-
the roles of law sufficiently-accounted for,
Court will direct its admission.
Held, again, Where the extracts of boon
are attached as exhibits to the answer to to ^
and are in evidence, yet this fact «•** ^
prive the party of the right to iotroa?.^
secondary evidence, if material, ana tno 10
tion for its admission is properly laid. ^
Judgment reversed, on the ground
secondary evidence ought to have beenaumi.
in evidence under the facts of the <^ se - .
R. S. WorriU, J. L. Wimberly, for P !aL -
in error.
F. EL Beall,, for defendant.
A Stumper.—Donn Piatt say3 General
and General Porter were veiy active in
to defeat Logan for the Senate, on the
of his opposition to the Domingo 'schex^ ^
Logan’s success gave Grant the J 0 ***?*, e-
has met with in the West When b°S
rived in Washington, saysDonn: $
•“Gen. Porter caUed and said: aro
to congratnlate you, General, upon yon ^
I called to have a little explanation, 8 . . yi
reot a misapprehension on yonr part,
the Administration had in any manner
or been inimical to yonr election. 4 c ;
sure yon, on the contrary, thatthe Pres.u
great solicitude for your success.’ c i: e Misl
“‘Ah!’said Logan, with just the .J c tf
smile of contempt and disbelief creep
his dark face, and reaching ont five orsK
in Porter’s handwriting, with “Execnti
sion” in larger print on the envelopes, ,rj
to different members of the Legist ’
you write these ?’ tie!-
“Porter modestly assented.
opening the door at which Porter nau
bowed ‘good evening.’ ”
month,
• #
If you have a bad taste in yonr _
ness or yellow color of akin, feel desp° n
pid and drowsy, appetite unsteady, frequ^ ^
ache or dizziness, you are “bilions,” an g
wiU arons o yonr Uver to action and sirens
your system equal to Dr. Pierce’s Alt. Ex - ^
den Medical Discovery. Used moderate?
exposure to malarial poisons it enables tn^ ^
work off the poison, and will thus pr“' Tfln
J. F. Winter vs. Matthew, Bnrke and Came
ron. Assnmpsit, from Muscogee.
Lochbane, O. J.—Where a party receives
money for investment, and the evidence con
flicts as to the use made of the fands, and os to
whether.they were in faot used in investment,
and the question is fairly submitted to the jury,
on the law of the ease, and the verdict of the
jury is sustained by the evidence;
Hdd, That in such case there is no error in — — r .
the court below refusing a new trial on this J diseases, it has never yet been equaled-
ground. | druggists
Where the plea and proof of the defendant,
by his own testimony, makes ont a ease of file-1 A toreign geuuemeu
gal contract, and there is other evidence d«- whenever he crosses the border ^ j, s v«
nying it, and the jury find against such plea on ! setts, because all the women d g
the facts snbmitted under the law to the jury ; “views.”
irevent
and bilious fevers. It is just the thing
dice. Aa a blood purifier for the care o P ^
blotches, eruptions, salt rheum, and^ t;
■ ^ j ii | nt^
A foreign gentleman declares that
