The banner of the South. (Augusta, Ga.) 1868-1870, December 26, 1868, Page 5, Image 5
~ General Early is a valuable
,hf to un * rilten hist,,r >' of
t but unsuccessful struggle for
'!'■ "Lfenal I***- A ’ such ' "•
rou&u* 1 * 1
iinnJ ,. D d it to our readers
v,,r the Bauner of the South.;
- ,ET US HAVE PEACE."
* ‘-If the passions of tbe day
: ~l tillUC to bear swr.y; if prejudice
! i tbe hour: H a conflict of races
• ! " ! if ambition shall turn tbe
“r- the sword shall be thrown in the
"V’,',.' .‘ (l inst patriotism; if the embers
: : ,t ' ; .fp C war shall he kept agiowing
; , v : t h ,ew fuel they flame up again,
r T. re>e iit gloom is but the shadow,
‘ , u/übi a, of that deeper and darker
.‘'.' which is to totally obscure this
I? uobere and blight, forever, the aux
'Unectatinns and anticipations of
i kind. — Stephen*.
IU The above words will be found in the
( ~( . ]u s; o ]) of the address of tbe Hon.
’\[ - 1 c liens before the General Assem
f/'; r.r the State of Georgia, Feb. 22d,
jlt would seem, it we looked at
,j it , r , r ,is and at the state of affairs now,
i |j ia t has been enacted since that
might almost think that Mr.
Stephens looked into the future with
~r , etic eye, and drew the picture
Acii has come, and is coming, so truly
~. If we take but a moment to
c . ij-idor, it must appear to a practical
that the things which he spoke of
1 arc daily coming to pass, and can we do
■ uvihiug else than fear that we are toex
j erieiice what he predicted, that the then
j resent shadow was but the penumbra of
the eclipse which was to totally obscure
us from the eyes of the nations of the
earth forever.
Let ns consider the propositions which
L 3 mentions: First, “If the passions of
the day shall continue to bear sway.” Do
we n-.t see it exemplified every day in
political circles. Instead of brotherly love
and unity, and harmony, reigning in
legislative halls, while endeavoring to re
store peace and quiet to our distracted
country, theie is every demonstration of
lanco: uus leding. Scarcely can we glance
at our political papers but we find some
g eat dispute between two contending
parties on some question or another. In
stead ui that quiet and deliberate man
ner in which such questions should be
tre&tod, we have violent demonstrations
i ot the party spirit which is so paramount
in the breasts of all our public men. And
even it* our public prints do we see the
: same. \-p. rit manifested—scathing and abu
% ai 'g ,la £e> one from another, because,
1 pori'hiiuce, the respective editors differ
hi th ,i :i opinions. None of the essence
0i brotherly, love is there to be found,
o. i< i any circumstance, and what more
tan we do than fear the awful conse
i lices which the illustrious Mr. Ste
phens has predicted. But, to continue:
Secondly, “If prejudice shall rule the
i . Ah! how muoh of this same in*
i stigatoi of mischief do we find in our
: ver ." wu]k ol' life, and more particularly
hvw eu the inhabitants of these two
great sections. And how very strong,
;I! ‘id, and.injudicious, it is in us to give
i ' l it instead ot standing up like
: ; 11 ’11, debating the great question of the
l . t;e\ id of any prejudiced feeling, one
‘ " " ,,r - ls tn *e, as a people, we
; ! v<! ( oi eto be prejudiced in a greater
j ' “ u - tee; we have known wrongs,
' l }P h Kis I1(, f becoming in us, as a
' 1 people, to stand up with a
hearing, but rather leave all
i . i: m the hands of an overruling
1 .^vu -nee. Who has said “Vengeance is
1 ‘“ ,,le -J!»Hwill repay.” Thirdly: “If
I K * ‘ ot races shall arise.” One
' V| > D ’ < r an sa y» has not come to pass
I bW : !‘ y - in . a * ma]l . degree; and what a
that ;,V tb t 0 di&tracted country
p, n’eat evil has not been added to
! P- ] which is already bitter, indeed,
fel ,Ut she dnmk to the
i. a l >eroißm and fortitude which
cuuse ? of le,u S applied to a better
ehoulil dV" 1 . 0 ’ ‘V. ls ?lia " leful she
man ;• jV' 1 "J,! 10 ' B «t,whereabrave
tain.,' Pi,, ""a O'crcome, he does r,o
hi. -”i v " submit quietly to whatever
fc'thc li. f;!' J °? er - for *• Discretion
kUt I’? 11 ol va lor:" and “why
Ifanihh I th n pricls Fourthly:
have ,n' j" 1! ‘i 1 t,u '. n . th '| scale.” Wo
ciicleg ,:;;r ambll,uu ,n our political
V si, ,v. le , illl ' b ‘tion which Should
more 0 „l. .f to raise us once
the I'aioo K.'j! h 0l!r - aister States in
hitioti a useless am
eaeho’ue ■',) ! !i '-endeavors to climb
th ° fickle
whether if i world, not caring
Dfetio,, Jt f y hc good Os the main
So far fro,, i“ 1 ," e wouid not have to
taace toan exam ple; for in
home- : .. i : . lre Uleu who leave their
! e; c“hundreds of miles, to pan
■hi: '. ll( -'hnations and intentions of
o'.vi. f P° w ’-*r, merely fur their
nieu k aR d to gain for them
selves notoriety among the persecutors of
his once flourishing State and country.
This is what we call a useless and selfish
ambition. But, on the other hand, let
there be a noble ambition, one that dees
not look to petty causes and pecuniarv
considerations, but that struggles to free
the country, the whole country, from the
thraldom in which it is entangled. That
is an ambition worthy of emulation.
Fifthly. “If the sword shall be thrown in
thp balance against patriotism.” We
think we can safely say that this is one if
in Mr. Stephens’ catalogue which has not
come to pass, and may we not all join in
fervent prayer to Heaven that this great
evil may be averted—that every thing
may be amicably ai ranged by peaceful
legislation rather than by an appeal to the
sword t \\ e have seen such a thing
tried to our sorrow, and better would it
have been for both parties had it been
settled by the very means we are now
advocating.
Mr. Stephens, whose remarks we have
taken the liberty to quote, says : “Wars,
and civil wars especially, always menace
liberty—they seldom advance it, while
they usually end in its entire overthrow
and destruction. We have taken into
consideration the few' points of that mem
orable address* we have endeavored to
look at them in a proper light, and if we
have said anything which is wrong or im
pi oper, we crave the indulgence of those
whose eyes may light on these columns,
from the fact that we did it unwittingly.
We would close by hoping that the Great
Disposer of events may speedily restore
peace and quiet to our distracted country.
H. W. J H.
Herndon , Ga., 1868.
For the Banner ot the South.
WOMAN’S INFLUENCE, CAPACITIES,
AND ADVANTAGES.
BY LILIA.
Someone has written, that Influence
is a talent of tuidefinable but universal
extent. Others have argued that Wo
man s Influence was weak and worthless.
This is the argument of a weak mind.
In this great Universe, there is no such
thing as a neutral being. We all do
good or harm. Every atom of matter is
of some importance—from the blade of
grass to the towering oak ; from the
sparkling gem upon the brow* of beauty
to the grain of' dust beneath her feet;
from the smallest animalculse that purify
the ocean’s waters to the bee that makes
our honey; from the swine up to the
king of beasts—all have a use, all exert
an influence. Can it, then, be denied to
anv human being?
An ebulition of spleen against the
female sex lias been common in all ages.
The old Greek bards indulged in it freely;
but, among those same old Greeks, every
man who excelled in noble qualities was
thought to have been taught by his
mother. Many of the wisest men of our
own day attribute their success to careful
mothers. Webster was an advocate for
the culture of female intellect, and he has
shown her powerful influence on the
morals of man.
llow unfortunate, that so few acknow
ledge, or realize, the extent of her influ
ence for the good of humanity. More
common than the denial of her influence
is the denial of her capacities; which last,
is quite as absurd as the first. Can anv
one deny her those abilities which the
pages of History reveal to all who read ?
There is scarcely any station in life
which has not, at some time, been filled
by Woman. The sacred writers, in the
Old and New Testament, have given nu
merous instances of her capacity to fill
high places. Even there, we read of her
as a Queen, a Judge, a Prophetess. If,
through Woman came the first sin, and
the first punishment, through her, also,
came the Redeemer.
An Assyrian Queen built great Baby
lon. Catharine of Russia, Elizabeth of
England, Maria Theresa of Austria, are
illustrious examples of Woman’s capacity
to govern, and to fill high places. Joan
of Are, and the Heroine of Switzerland,
arc not the only ones who have fought in
defense ot Liberty. Y\ Oman’s eloquence
once saved Rome.
Has Woman no capacities for the
Arts and Sciences ? Can she not soar
aloft to the home of Genius, and revel
amid the glories of Literature ?
From the time of the Lesbian Poetess
down to the present century, a bright and
glowing record of her achievements
might be given? Madame De Stael,
Hannah More, and Mary Summerville
are known to all; but there are a host of
others, too numerous to mention, that
are bright stars in our literary horizon.
Do you need proofs of her desire for
knowledge ?
Ever since the thirst for knowledge
tempted Sheba s Queen to travel from
far off Arabia to learn of Israel’s King
\\ ornan has shown an eager desire for
learning.
Morally and intellectually Man’s equal,
if not superior, why is it she occupies, at
the present time, an inferior position ?
Is it because of physical insuperiority, or
waut of proper culture ! Why is it, that
having these elements of greatness, she
so often neglects them ?
Many of the opposite sex are ready
now to question : why, if Woman is so
influential, so richly endowed with
capacities for doing good, why is it she so
often tramples everything like noble
efforts beneath her feet ?
These are questions 1 desire to an
wer; not trying to prove her wholly
guiltless, for, alas ! I must acknowledge
that, like some great pyramid, she casts a
long shadow on one side, but she catches
as much sunlight on the other
Dear friends of my own sex, fain would
I shield you; but candor compels me to
admit that Woman neglects many oppor
tunities of improvement, because her
gieatest, happiness is an absorbing desire
for admiration Irom the opposite sex.
\\ lien Woman becomes Mans com
petitor in the field of Science, he may
admire ; but his affections are given not
to those who emulate and surpass him,
but to those who can look up and adore.
W oman should be educated, however,
even though she should be called to fili
no higher place than the housewife. The
comfort and happiness of thousands de
pend upon a well ordered household.
1 his is the province of Woman. To con
duct it well, she should be, morally and
intellectually, capable. Must she, then,
be allowed to emulate the animal that
never raises its head above the ground
where it feeds ? Should not Man lay
aside Envy and Jealousy, and elevate
Woman, by giving her superior advan
tages to those now within her reach ?
I have already given one reason why
she dare not become Man’s competitor in
the Sciences. There is another. She so
seldom has the necessary advantages to
develope her capaicties, there is no field
open where her unemployed energies may
be exercised. Like Ruth, she would
willingly glean; but she has no Boaz,
like lluth, to give her encouragement.
We live in an age where Mind is not,
the “statue, of the Man,” far less the
Woman. Worth is now measured by
many things before the Mind is put in
the balance.
Among us , this is Woman’s mission—
TO GET married. From the cradle, the
importance of marrying well is taught to
her. “Get a husband,” “get a husband.”
She hears this song in some form or
other from the time she can speak.
Ah ! yes, a young lady must marry!
0! if she don’t! Dear girls, is it
necessary to enumerate the long catalogue
of consequences, if she don't? We°all
know it by heart. We must marry, to
be respected. Married ladies are of so
much importance in society. Old maids
are always a subject of ridicule; they are
always in somebody's way ; they are
always ugly, sour, cross; young men
laugh at them, Ac., Ac. Our careful
friends make us familiar with all these
horrors of a maiden life, and they are so
often hurled at us, that girls naturally
think all the horrors of pandemonium lie
in the terrible thing—a life of celibacy.
0, yes 1 a woman must marry—that’s the
end and aim of life, particularly of South
ern women. A Northern woman may
work her way through the world single,
and sometimes gain a little respect ~if
she don’t, she can go into business; she
can teach; she can lecture; she can write*
but, unfortunately, the majority of South
ern girls have never been taught that life
had any higher aims than matrimony.
The girl of twelve begins to paint, curl,
flirt, and what not, until she lias caught
a husband.
A terrible thiug it is for a Southern
girl, particularly those in the so-called
higher circles, to remain single. A life
of idle misery waits her. Reared up to
believe work degrading* she scarcely dare
do more than her own embroidery, lest
somebody say she is a poor girl.
Augustus Caesar boasted that bis
imperial robes were made by bis wife,
sister and daughter. Alexander the Great
wore garments woven by bis sister.
Women do not boast of such work in
these days.
It she happen to improve her mind
enough to turn her attention to literature,
she is at once spurned as a blue stocking.
Matrimony is the only dose of escape.
She must fly from the ills she lias to
those she knows not of.
Again, woman will risk much for
love. She is so constituted by nature as
to desire it above all things. Truthfully,
has the poet said :
“01 man's life, Love is a thing, apart—
'Tis woman’s whole existence.”
Since Lesbian Sappho took the fatal
le ap from the Leucadiau rock, in the
vain hope of finding a cure for the pangs
of unrequited love for Phaon, since
Cleopatra died for Antony, Woman has
been sacrificing her time, her talents, her
life for Love.
If, then, \Y Oman’s influence is weakened
n her capacities are improved— it
niu>t be that she has not the necessary
advantages for improvement, and that
she has no stimulus to exert it to action.
Elev ate the standard of intellect and
morality among the young men of the
present day, and Woman will soon begin
to emulate the example, by using all the
means within her reach for improvement;
not with the desire to outstrip man in the
race for fame or wealth; but with the de
sire to be a loved and appreciated equal.
ffost
[i rider this bead, we propose to pub*
li>h, weekly, Sketches, Anecdotes and
Reminiscences of the struggle for South
ern Independence; and earnestly solicit
contributions containing such Sketches,
Reminiscences and Anecdotes.]
STONEWALL JACKSON AT FREDER
ICKSBURG,
LETTER FROM MAJOR GENERAL
JUBAL A. EARLY.
Drummondville, Ontario, Canada, )
December 10th, 1868. j
Editors Morning News:
The communication to your paper over
the signature of “ A Virginian,” in refer
ence to Pollard’s statement that Gen.
Jackson “once recommended a night
attack, to be made by assailants stripped
naked, and armed with Bowie knives,”
with your comments, I have met with in
another journal, and I trust it will not be
considered obtrusive on my part to make
a statement of facts coming within my
knowledge, and going to show that there
was no foundation either for Pollard’s
statement, or that of your correspondent.
Os what little is left us, there is noth
ing which we should guard with more
care than the sacred memory of our fallen
heroes, and in the case of General Jack
son, it is more necessary to protect his
reputation against the commentaries of
injudicious friends, than even the assaults
of open enemies.
I served under Gen. Jackson from the
beginning of the battle of Malvern Hill to
his death, and I was personally* present
as a Brigade, or Division commander in
every battle in which he participated,
during that period, from the beginning to
the close of the engagements, except the
battle of Chancellorsville, proper, at which
time, I had a separate duty assigned me
at Fredericksburg. I served with him
longer than any other General officer of
Lis command, and I was a Division com
mander in his corps longer thuu any who
survived the war. It will therefore be
seen that it is not inappropriate that I
should say something, when statements
are ostentatiously put forth, which, how
ever intended, are calculated to bring
discredit on the great, and pure soldier,
and Christian who gave his life to his
country’s defence.
I have not seen Mr. Pollard’s article
in 1 utnam s Monthly, and all I know of
it, is what I see in the communication to
your paper, and your own comments. I
can undertake to assert, with the most
perfect confidence, that Gen. Jackson
could not have made such a proposition
as that mentioned by Pollard, because it
was a moral impossibility for him to have
done it. Gladiators, in ancient times, or
the members of the prize-ring in modern
times, might strip for their brutal con
tests, but there is a sentiment among all
civilized, Christian people, which would
prevent a decent man from being as
brave when stripped naked, as when his
nakedness is concealed by his usual cov
ering. A naked sword is more terrible
than a sheathed one, but there is no
reason why a naked man should be more
terrible than a well-clad one; and certain
ly at the battle of Fredericksburg, in the
middle of December, a body of naked
assailants would soon have become so
paralyzed by the cold, that the enemy
would have had no trouble in dealing
with them. Geu. Jackson not only could
not have made so foolish, so absurd a
a proposition at Fredericksburg, or any
where else, for these reasons, but he could
not have done it for the simple and con
clusive reason, that at no time were the
Bowie knives to be had. In the very
beginning of the war, some men carried
with them into the service Bowie knives,
but they were never very plenty, and
the only Military use I ever knew to be
made of them was in aiding to throw up
a slight entrenchment the day after the
light at Blackburn’s Ford, on Bull Run.
After that time there were generally
abandoned, or, if used at all, used only
for chopping beef. I don’t think that
in General Jackson s entire corps euough
could have been found to arm one Com
pany, and there were certainly none in
the Ordnance Department.
Your correspondent states, as corrobo
rative of Pollard’s statement, that at
Fredericksburg, on the night of the 13th
of December, 1862, after the enemy’s
repulse, a council of war was held by the
Confederate Chiefs, at which, General
Jackson “suggested that the Artillery
ol tae h lrst and Second Corps, his and
Longstreet’s should be collected upon the
nils directly front of the town, and a
he.ny lire opened upm, it, and that the
men o. i~ corps be stripped to the waist,
to distinguish them from the enemy, and
under cover of the Artillery tire, force
their way into the town, and bayonet all
who were not similarly attired.” This
suggestion, your correspondent says, was
adopted, but not carried out, and, he
further says, “it was afterwards told by
men of the Second Corps, that they had
received orders to strip to their waist.”
Your comments on Pollard’s statement
•tie \eiy just, though you seem to concede
the correctness of that ot your correspon
dent. Not doubting the sincerity
correspondent’s belief in what lie states,
yet, it he has no better authority for it
than the uncontradicted statement of
some Army correspondent, or a. camp
rumor, I will say that he has very bad
authority. There were numerous erro
neous statements which found their way
into the newspapers, and went uncontra
dicted, as there were many false reports
in camp which obtained credence son
times even from officers. General Lee
never thought it consistent with his po
sition to contradict any of the many
erioneous statements put afloat during
tbe war, and he discouraged everything
of the kind on the part of his officers. I
knew his views on that subject, because
on one occasion, when I had corrected a
misstatement of a correspondent in regard
to some ot my own operations, lie gave
me, privately, a gentle rebuke, which dis
closed his own views, and effectually pre
vented me from repeating the indiscre
tion. Ihe reasons which govern Mili
tary men, especially such Military men
us Generals Lee and Jackson, are very
different trom those which govern politi
cians in dealing with newspaper state
ments. Nothing, therefore is to be
inferred in favor ot the truth an anony
mous statement in regard to the Military
operations in the Army of Northern
\ irginia, because it has gone uncontra
dicted.
Ihe statement of your correspondent,
if true, shows either that Gen. Jackson
proposed to commit a very great blun
der, or that General Lee was guilty of
an unpardonable negligence.
1 think there is as little truth in that
statement as there is in the one made by
Pollard, and I will state the following
facts to show why I think so:
At the battle of Fredericksburg, I
commanded a Division in Gen. Jackson’s
Corps, (tbe 2nd,) and my Division met
a part ol the enemy, who had broken
through our lines on tbe right, and drove
him back inm the plains beyond, a fact
which will be well recollected by some of
your readers, as a Georgia Brigade,
(Lawton’s, afterwards Gordon’s,) led in
the attack, and greatly distinguished it
self. Two of my Brigades which had
met the enemy, and aided in his repulse,
then occupied portions of the front line,
lor the rest of the day, and it was very
apparent to us that while the enemy’s
attack had been repulsed, he had a very
large force that had not been engaged,
which still threatened another attack on
our right. Late in the afternoon, Gen.
Jackson did determine to attack the
enemy after the repulse of the attacks on
our left, and I was ordered to lead in the
proposed attack with my Infantry pre
ceded by Artillery, while General D. 11.
Hill followed me with his Division in
support. Everything was got ready for
the attack, and the movement was begun,
but the enemy opened such a terrific fire
from his Artillery, which swept all the
wide plain in our front, that General
Jackson, who was out with the advance,
countermanded his orders, because, as It
says in his report: “The first gun had
hardly moved forward from the wood a
hundred yards, when the enemy’s Artil
lery re-opened, and so completely swept
our front, as to satisfy me that the pro
posed movement should be abandoned.”
It was getting dark when this movement
was abandoned, and it was well that it
was given up, for the enemy had an im
mense force of Infantry, that had not
been engaged, massed in the road which
ran through the middle of the river bot
toms, behind the high, thick, and solid
embankment of earth, which served as an
enclosure for the adjacent fields, and
furnished a breastwork co-extensive with
our whole front ou this part of* the line,
and much stronger than the famous
stone-wall at the base ofMarye’s Hill.
There was a similar embankment on the
other side of the road, forming a second
Hue, and the front one had been pierced
in numerous places lor Artillery, so that
irom behind it a storm of cannister and
rifle balls would have belched forth, that
would have rendered it utterly impossi
5