Newspaper Page Text
Page 4 - The Wiregrass Farmer, October 22, 2008
Editorial & Opinion
The WIREGRASS FARMER - Established 1902
Official Legal Organ of Turner County
109 Gordon Street • P.O. Box 309 • Ashburn, GA 31714
Telephone 229-567-3655
email wiregrassfarmer@yahoo.com
THE WIREGRASS FARMER (USPS 487-460) is published
every Wednesday by Ashburn Newspapers, Inc., 109 N. Gordon St,
Ashburn, Georgia. Periodicals Postage Paid at Ashburn, Georgia.
POSTMASTER: Send address changes to The Wiregrass
Farmer, 109 N. Gordon St., Ashburn, GA 31714
STAFF
Bob Tribble, President • Ann Knight, General Manager
Ben Baker, Editor • Linda Sellars, Sales Director
Robin Tillman, Office Manager
SUBSCRIPTION RATES
Senior Citizen discount in county only $20.00
Inside Turner County, $24.00 • Elsewhere in Georgia, $32.00
Outside Georgia, $40. Overseas rates on request.
OUR POLICIES
Signed letters to the editor are welcomed. Please limit letters to 500
words and include a name, an address and phone number where the writer
may be reached during the day. Addresses and phone numbers will not be
published. Unsigned letters will not be published. All letters become prop
erty of the newspaper. Liability for an error will not exceed the cost of the
space occupied by the error.
We cannot be responsible for the return of pictures or materials unless
a self-addressed stamped envelope is included.The deadline for LEGAL
NOTICES is Monday NOON before Wednesday’s publication. Holiday
deadlines will be announced at least one week in advance.
Letters
An honest opinion
Editor
There has been a lot of back and forth in The Wiregrass about
the presidential candidates this election year. I’ve decided to put
my two cent worth in this week. I am not a fan of either candi
date, but I know who I will be voting for.
Neither Mr. Perry nor Ms. Watson has been untruthful in their
letters to the editor, but both have had their slant. I’m sure mine
will as well. I promise to be as honest as I can about both candi
dates.
Neither McCain nor Obama appear to be great presidents in
my book. Neither have any executive experience, a must in my
opinion. Neither seems to understand that government interven
tion is not the answer to the financial crisis we face today. The
free market always works itself out. Just look at gas prices. The
price has dropped 35 cents in two weeks, without any government
regulations.
With that said, here are my pros and cons of Senator McCain.
He is a war hero, a HUGE plus for Commander in Chief of the
armed forces. He was a U.S. Representative from 1983 - 1987.
He then went on to the Senate from 1987 - present. He has
always been known as a maverick that would cross party lines to
get things done (even if I disagree with most of them). That is
why he has had a hard time energizing the conservative base, he
is not a true conservative. As a tme conservative, it scares me that
McCain has sponsored bills with the likes of Ted Kennedy and
Russ Feingold.
The McCain-Kennedy bill was an attempt to provide amnesty
to the illegal immigrants who have entered our country illegally,
thus becoming a criminal the time they touched American soil.
We already have the laws in place to combat illegal immigration.
We just need to enforce them.
The McCain-Feingold bill basically limits free speech con
cerning elections. The only side the public gets to hear is what the
candidates tell them and the media's spin on the candidates views,
which is always tilted in favor of the liberal politician. The media
is totally exempt from the restrictions that McCain-Feingold bill
has on other groups. This of course would make them even more
powerful in leading the public down the liberal primrose path.
The NRA, Unions, and Christian Pro Family Organizations can’t
educate voters on a candidate’s record or history. Thanks, John.
On the other hand, John McCain is in favor of overturning
Roe v. Wade. Don’t get too excited yet, this doesn’t actually ban
abortion. It would return the decision to the individual states,
which is a good thing. He has voted to ban partial birth abortion,
something I think we can all agree on.
I’m mixed on McCain’s spending policies. He is in favor of
vetoing all pork barrel spending and making public those who
sponsor pork. He has voted numerous times to cut federal spend
ing, yet he supports the bailout. On top of that he has promised
another $300 billion to rescue people who bought homes they
couldn’t afford. That is just foolish and socialistic.
Now on to Senator Obama.
I’ll begin with the pros. He has energized his voting block like
no other politician before him. He is an American success story in
his meteoric rise through the political ranks. He is the first
African-American major party nominee. He has managed to sur
vive numerous email attacks against him. I don’t think we should
use unproven statements to disqualify a candidate from receiving
my vote.
On the other hand, one has to ask how he rose so quickly. No
politician has ever come to prominence like Barack Obama. His
greatest strength is also his biggest weakness. Experience.
He was a member of the Illinois State Senate from 1997-2004.
He then was elected to the U.S. Senate in 2004. He immediately
began his bid for the White House. Most people think he came
out of nowhere this year, but those of us who follow politics knew
he was mnning four years ago. This is why he voted “present” on
many controversial topics. He was writing his own history in a
way that he thought would make him the best candidate for the
White House. In my opinion, if you can’t decide on one vote out
of a hundred, how can you make a lone decision as President?
Obama claims to be a new type of politician, but his record
and actions show that he is just another panderer like those before
him. He has no record of bipartisanship, his positions seem to
change depending on who he’s speaking in front of. He will throw
anyone under the bus that may hurt his chances of winning the
election. This includes his own grandmother, who he referred to
as a “typical white person” who is afraid of blacks. Why exactly
did she help raise you then, Barry?
He has acquaintances that he has flat out lied about in order to
distance himself from them. He sat in the pew for twenty years
and listened to the sermons of Jeremiah Wright. The man married
the Obamas and baptized their children. Yet Sen. Obama claims
he never heard any of Wright’s anti semetic, anti American
speech. I can’t prove that he did, but that dog just don’t hunt.
(See LETTERS Page 7)
Letters to the editor welcome!
Your opinion is important! Write: Editor, P.O. Box 309,
Ashburn GA 31714 or email <wiregrass farmer@yahoo.com> We
do not charge to publish letters to the editor. But, your letter must
meet our publication requirements. Letters must be signed. We
must have a phone number to call to verify the number. (Your
phone number will not be published). Letters which do not meet
our publishing requirements won’t be printed. Call 567-3655 for
more information.
Bailing someone out of jail
A longtime friend called ^ than blaming all Congressmen
me the other day and ask me to
write something about the gov
ernment bailout. She jokingly
said she thought a bailout was
when you bailed someone out
of jail. Her call prompted me to
do what she asked so the fol
lowing are my thoughts on the
issue.
In my expert economic
opinion there are two main fac
tors that have caused the large
majority of our present prob
lems. First, the banks who
made loans to those who pur
chased homes with no down
payments and questionable
ability to repay the loans did it
to themselves and should have
to suffer the consequences of
their mistakes. And secondly,
the outrageous prices working
folks have had to pay to keep
gasoline in their tanks over the
past year when all they could
do was sit back and watch the
oil companies make record
profits month after month. Had
these two problems been
solved there would have been
no need for a $700 billion dol
lar bailout.
Again, in my expert eco
nomic opinion our country is
not in as bad a shape as those
in power wish us to believe it
is. Yes, unemployment is up
and other factors are somewhat
out of line but not enough to
panic and try to bailout banks
and Wall Street with taxpayers’
money.
Many bad business deci
sions have been made over the
From Where I
Sit
past few years, especially by
our country’s lending institu
tions. Other businesses have
made bad business decisions
and they are faced with solving
their own problems. We have
made a good number of bad
business decisions within our
newspaper group but would not
let the government (taxpayers)
bail us out of those situations if
they offered.
Most people are blaming
President George Bush for our
economy’s present situation
when the blame should not be
put on his shoulders alone. If
President Bush is to be blamed
then our Congressmen and
Senators must also take part of
the blame. There are not many
things the president can do
without approval of the House
and Senate.
Presently, many people are
blaming Senator John McCain
for part of the problem and that
has no basis either anymore
and Senators as stated above.
Many folks are trying to make
a big connection between
President Bush, whose ratings
are not very high, and Senator
McCain. Check the voting
record. Senator McCain has
not been a yes man to all of
President Bush’s proposals.
Many questions are being
asked about the bailout of the
financial institutions and other
businesses, and if there was
really a major crisis. Small
businesses that required mod
est lines of credit to meet oper
ational expenses and pay their
bills on time probably were
feeling a “trickle down.” So
Main Street USA did feel some
of the problems larger busi
nesses were having.
Most members of Congress
have never run a business, or
have not in a very long time, so
their understanding of Main
Street economics was not at the
level of economic advisors
who most had to rely on.
Since the Wall Street and
financial institutions bailout
has cost $700 billion dollars,
we need to expect better eco
nomic times in the future. Fet’s
hope that lessons have been
learned from events of the past
several months.
In conclusion, my longtime
friend is probably right when
she said that bailout was bail
ing someone out of jail. Our
government probably did that
maybe unknowingly.
T K f tf; M; J i.v
ll'.yj.- yrrYlniiU IwifjR. Tv
Wishbone, Backbone, & Funnybone ... by Charles B. Perry
A few weeks ago during a
trip out west, we stopped in
Deadwood, South Dakota. As
we were walking down one of
the streets we drifted into an
old, small antique store where I
purchased several old U.S.
Marshall, Sheriff, and Texas
Ranger Badges. Upon return
ing home, I decided to browse
my collection more closely. As
I studied each of them each it
was the Texas Ranger badge
really peaked my interest. I
then realized that although I
had heard of the Texas Rangers
all my life, I knew very little
about them. I hope you enjoy
the following brief history of
the famous Texas Rangers.
As a group and as individu
als, the Texas Rangers brought
order to a wild and lawless
land, They grew into one of the
most respected and best-known
peacekeeping forces in the
world.
The history of the Rangers
can be traced as far back as
1823 and to Stephen F. Austin,
the man often called “The
Father of Texas”. Eager to pro
vide protection for the first
American settlers in the region,
Austin offered to ‘employ ten
men to act as rangers for the
common defense.” To fill the
job as “rangers” they would
need to provide their own hors
es and weapons, and be hardy
enough to handle a life on the
trail. There had never been
anything quite like the Texas
Rangers before! Fike police
man, they tracked down mur
derers, outlaws, and cattle
thieves, the Rangers had a
jurisdiction as big as all of the
state of Texas; their ‘beat’ cov
ered more square miles that
there are in some countries.
Tough and resourceful, the
Rangers patrolled the wide-
open frontier of Texas for
weeks and months at a time,
often living off the land and
navigating without maps. As
the Rangers protection from
Indian Raids to the settlers,
they soon matched the Indian’s
skills of horsemanship and
tracking. They fought with
such ferocity they soon gained
respect from the Indians.
Fending aid to the U.S. Army
in the Mexican War, the
Rangers were such fearsome
combatants that the Mexican
army dubbed them “Eos
Diablos Tejanos”...the Texas
Devils.
There have been many
famous Texas Rangers...
although few are household
names. Individually, the Texas
Rangers were some of the most
colorful heroes in America’s
history. Together, they brought
peace to an untamed frontier,
where settlers faced dangers
from hostile Indians, cattle
rustlers, marauding bandits and
murderous gunslingers.
Maj. John B. Jones, the first
commander of the Frontier
Battalion in 1874. Through his
leadership the Rangers were
transformed from a loosely
organized band of on-again,
off-again volunteers into a per
manent, well-organized and
highly disciplined law-enforce
ment division.
Capt. Feander McNelly was
the leader of a group of
Rangers officially known as the
‘Special Forces’ who patrolled
the Texas-Mexico border. They
were more popularly known as
‘McNelly’s Rangers’ and they
showed no mercy to the des
perados that were foolish
enough to tangle with McNelly
and his Rangers. Sgt. John B.
Armstrong, a member of
‘McNelly’s Rangers’, was
tenacious in his pursuit of an
outlaw. He tracked killer John
Wesley Hardin from Texas to
Pensacola, Florida where he
was arrested.
Ranger, Capt. William
McDonald had been a Deputy
Sheriff and U.S. Marshal. He
also served as a body guard to
President Theodore Roosevelt.
He was noted for his fearless
ness and provided history with
two of the Rangers most
famous quotations.
McCondal was sent to
Dallas, Texas to break up a
fight, when McDonald arrived,
the Mayor of Dallas seeing he
had arrived alone asked,
“Where are the others?”
McDonald answered, “Ain’t I
enough? There’s only one
fight!” Another of McDonald’s
quotes that certainly help label
the Rangers was “No man in
the wrong can stand against a
fellow who’s in the right and
keeps on a-comin’!”
Today, the Texas Rangers
remain an integral law enforce
ment agency. As times have
changed, so have the Ranger’s
methods. Employing the latest
technology and training in the
latest methods of scientific
detection, they are equal to any
investigative agency in the
world. Though time has
brought many changes, the
Texas Rangers remain an elite
force. They are still the
resourceful, untiring lawman
whose exploits are legendary
around the world...’the men in
the right who keep on a-
comin’. Until next time...
Baker’s Dozen
F ar aints
For the person who gave
the name to the festival that
has generated international
attention for this small South
Georgia town, you’d think I’d
feel differently about
Solenopsis invicta.
Yes, I refer here to that
invader who was welcomed
with the same open arms that
greeted yankee carpetbaggers
after the end (on paper any
way) the War of Northern
Aggression. I bring your atten
tion to that mighty mite, that
midge of mayhem, that
diminutive dynamo of destruc
tion, that colossal creature of
chaos and that’s enough alliter
ation for right now.
Fire ants.
Call ‘em what you will, call
‘em what you want, if you are
from the South you have a vast
number of names for this South
American invader.
Fire ants have, at various
times, thought to be beneficial.
Except for educating a few
folks as to why they do not
need to live in the South, I can
not see how the fire ant has
done anything helpful. You’d
think fire ants would gleefully
attack termites, but nooooo.
You can have a huge infesta
tion of both of ‘em.
I think they gang up on us
underground to stage massive
practical jokes.
“Here’s the plan,” say the
queens (oh yes, fire ants and
termites are led by queens,
females. Betcha THAT gives
you a new understanding of
fire ants). “The termites will
undermine the floor. When
they have all the wood chewed
up so that it barely supports a
human, the ants will attack.
When the ants attack, the
humans will begin jumping up
and down and the floor will
collapse.”
This of course happens and
both colonies of critters then
nearly die laughing.
You can hear ‘em if you lis
ten closely enough.
Anyway. Even as I type
this, I have a fire ant blister on
my left wrist. As I prop my
hands on the edge of the table
which serves as my desk, this
particular bite is also resting on
the table. Happy happy, joy
joy. Arg.
But this also reminds me of
a time back when Farry
“Hawgin”’ Fishbreath and I
played golf. He still does now
and then, whereas I have sworn
off except for charity golf tour
naments when I get to drive the
refreshment wagon.
We were on the course one
day when an obvious yankee
pulled up next to us. He rooted
around in his bags for a while
at the tee and finally quit with
a disgusted look on his face.
“Youse guys gotta tee?” he
asked.
“Naw. We don’t use ‘em no
more,” Hawgin’ said. “I find I
get a better drive without one.”
I too was lacking tees. And
clubs. And golf balls. I was in
charge of the cooler and fish
ing gear. Every time we got to
a water hazard, we fished.
The yankee golfer muttered
under his breath and walked to
the tee. He dropped the ball.
“Hey. Rather than do that,
why don’t ya prop yer ball on
that mound of dirt over there,”
Hawgin’s said.
Yep. Prezackly what you’re
thinking.
A light glinted in the
golfer’s eye. He got behind the
mound and eyed down the fair
way. Hawgin’ slid into the cart
driver’s seat.
“Baker, we best be goin’
now,” he whispered.
“I totally agree,” I said.
The golfer laid his ball on
the mound. He took his stance.
He swung.
The mound exploded.
As we crested the hill driv
ing wide open back to the club
house, we could hear his
screams.