Newspaper Page Text
Page 6
J
(am
'1 I
JjESz
'Kw i 1 ’
V Cl
\ t
\ f $
An n
BLJ
■i
1 1
□33
TRENCH & CAMP
Published weakly at the National Campa and Cantonments for the aoldlors of the'
United Stater
National Head quartern .
Room 694, Pnlltaer Building
New York City
’ JOHN STEWART BRYAN
Chatrsntfi.' es Advisory Board of Co-operating Publishers
Camp and Ixieatlon Newspaper Publisher
Camp Beauregard, Alexandria, 2a-. . . JNew Orleans Times PicayuneD. D. Moore
Camp Bowie, Fort Worth, Texas.'"ort Worth Star TelegramAmon C. Carter
Camp Cody, Deming, N. MexEl Paso HeraldH. D. Slater
Camp Custer, Battle Creek, Mich..... .Battle Creek Enquirer-NewsA. L. Miller
Camp Devens, Ayer, Massßoston GloboCharles H. Taylor, Jr.
Camp- Dlx, Wrightstown, N. JTronton Times James Kerney
Camp Dodge, Dos Moines, lowa.-Dea Moines Register Gardner Cowles
Camp Doniphan, Fort Sill, Okla.)Oklahoma City OklahomanE. K. Gaylord
Camp Fremont. Paio Alto, Cal San Francisco Bulletinß. A. Crothers
Camp Funston, Fort Riley, Kan Topeka State Journal Frank P. MacLennan
Cann* Gordon, Atlanta, GaAtlantic Constitution Clark Howell
Camp Grant, Rockford, IIIThe Chicago Daily News Victor F. Lawson
Camp Greene, Charlotte, N. C...Charlotto ObserverW. P. Sullivan
Camp Hancock, Augusta) GaAugusta Heraldßowdre Phinlzy
Camp Jackson, Columbia, S. CColumbia StateW. W. Ball
Camp Johnston, Jacksonville, Fla Jacksonville Times-UnionW. A. Elliott
Camp Kearny, Linda Vista, Cal Los Angeles Times Harry Chandler
Camp Lee, Petersburg, Vaßichmond News Leader John Stewart Bryan
Camp Lewis, American Lakes, Wash.. .Tacoma TribuneF. S. Baker
Camp Logan. Houston, Texas Houston PostGough J. Palmer
Camp MacArthur, Waco, Texas Waco Morning News Charles E. Marsh
Camp McClellan, Anniston, Alaßirmingham (Ala.) NewsF. P. Glass
Camp Meade, Admiral, Md. Wash., D. C. Evening Star... .Fleming Newbold
Fort Oglethorpe, Ga..... Chattanooga (Tenn.) Times>H. C. Adler
Camp Pike, Little Rock, Ark Arkansas Democrat Elmer E. Clarke
Camp Sevier, Greenville, S. CCharleston, S. C., News and Courier..R. C. Siegllng
Camp Shelby, Hattiesburg, Miss New Orleans Item James M. Thomson
Camp Sheridan, Montgomery, Ala Montgomery AdvertiserC. H. Allen
Camp Zachary Taylor, Louisville, Ky.,.Louisville Courier Journalßruce Haldeman
KeHy F^rtn^camrsunle^’’:::} 81 * 1 Ant ° n, ° L “ ht Char,es S ’ Dlehl
Camp Upton, Yaphank, L. 1., N. YNew. York World Don C. Seitz
Camp Wheeler, Macon, Ga. Macon TelegraphP. T. Anderson
Published under the auspices of the National War Work Council, Y. M. C. A. of the
United States, with the co-operation of the above named publishers and papers.
Distributed free to the soldiers In the National Camps and Cantonments. Civilian
subscription rates on application. ‘
When they call you in to give you
these new mental tests they are talk
ing so much about, you will hesitate
between two opinions: One will be
that the man who is testing you is
crazy. The other will be that he mis
takes you for a fool. You will think
one or the other of these must be the
only possible explanation of the fool
ish questions asked you and the fool
ish tests to which you are put.
But there’s a method in this seeming
madness—a very sensible method and
a very saving reason. It is this: No
two men in the army are exactly alike
in mind and muscle any more than
they are alike in face. Put two good
soldiers in the field and one can walk
as far or run as fast as the other. Put
them in the mess and it is a draw as
to which of the two can eat the most.
But call them both suddenly, and one
will start nervously, while the other
will answer quickly. Hurl them
around rapidly in a chair, as they do
with the candidates for aviation, and
one will regain his balance almost on
the instant, while the other will feel
that whole room swimming ajpout
him. Tell both *to perform certain
muscular actions while a third person
counts five, and one will regulate his
movements to the count while the
other will be confused by the very fact
that he must make haste. All these
differences between men are the so
called muscular, mental and nervous
“reactions” and if thejr mean very lit
tle in ordinary business they mean
all the difference between success and
German duplicity does not end with
the battle-lines. It extends to diplo
macy, to trade and to government.
It seeks to deceive the Russians into
believing that Germany favors peace
“without annexations and indemnities,”
and, in the same breath, it assures the
junkers that nothing will be done to
limit the conquests of the sword. It
maintains the unyielding autocracy of
the kaiser and, almost in the same
phrase, it tells the German people that
theirs is a free government.
This was the spirit that prompted
the Allgemeine Zeitung of Essen, whan
in discussing Mr. Wilson’s great ad
dress on peace terms, it scoffed at the
President’s arraignment of the Ger
man system of government. “Presi
dent Wilson,” it said, “seems not to
know that the smallest appropriation
for the army requires the sanction of
the reichstag, the most democratic
parliament in the world.”
“The most democratic parliament in
the world”—the phrase is turned with
such calm assurance that the unthink
ing may be disposed to accept it as a
statement of fact. In reality, it is cf a
piece with the whole German policy of
deception—including self-deception.
For this “most democratic parlia
ment” is only one house of the Ger
man parliament, and if it is democratic,
its influence is largely offset by that of
the other house. In the reichstag.
which corresponds to our Federal
House of Representatives, members
are chosen by universal suffrage on
the basis of population. That is de
mocracy. But the upper house, cor
responding to ouf Senate, is a far dif
ferent body. It is composed of fifty
eight members, of which seventeen
come from the kingdom of Prussia.
At its head is the chancellor, the direct
spokesman of the kaiser. Its members
do not represent the people of the
several kingdoms, duchies, principali
ties and free tcwxu, but the govern-
TESTING TO SELECT AND PROTECT
GERMAN “DEMOCRACY” AS IT IS
TRENCH AND.CAMP
failure—yes, sometimes, between life
and death—when it comes to selecting
men for the thousand varied duties of
the army.
Every good soldier is ambitious—to
shine, if he can do so honorably, to
rise, if he be found worthy■—but am
bitious above all to do his duty. That
involves a world of things, courage,
persistence, willingness to learn, pa
tience and real manhood. But it -in
volves more than some of us think
being rightly placed to do one’s work.
Most men who are worthy of the name
try to do their best, no matter what
task you give them; but few men can
really do their duty—their full, whole
souled duty—unless zlhey ar’e as
signed work they are fitted to per
form.
These tests are designed to demon
strate what duty a man can do best.
If he was born to be an aviator, the
general test will show enough to war
rant more detailed experiments. If
he has the eye and the sense of time
that fit him for bomb-throwing, the
tests will d.isclcse his qualities. And
if he ought to be assigned duty in the
rear, in justice to himself and his com
rades, those simple little experiments
and those innocent little questions will
put the right mark on him.
Some of these boys will probably
growl a little at more examinations.
That is our prerogative. But you may
write this down and remember it:
These long-named tests are as truly
protective as they are selective and
they are to help make Uncle Sam’s
the best army possible.
ments, and they must always vote
under instructions. This state of
things makes the bundesrat the crea
ture of the governments and sets at
naught the seeming democracy of the
reichstag.
But this is not all. AU the delega
tions in the bundesrat must vote as a
unit, although the total number of the
votes of each delegation is counted.
This naturally gives Prussia an advant
age which is made positive tyranny by
other sections of the constitution. For
when it comes to military and naval
matters, the Prussian representatives
in the bundesrat have an absolute veto
upon all legislation. If, tomorrow, the
reichstag were to vote for demobiliza
tion and the majority cf the bundesrat
would approve it ft he vote of Prussia
alone could continue the <ar. It is
the same with all laws affecting the
Imperial taxes. Prussia can absolutely
control these through the veto. And
to make assurance double sure, the
kaiser has the right to appoint the
whole ox the bundesrat committee on
naval affairs and all except one mem
ber of the committee on army and
fortifications. As the consent of the
bundesrat, but not cf the reichstag, is
necessary fcr treaties and declarations
of war, Prussia once again is supreme.
As is the bundesrat, so must be the
reichstag; as is Prussia, so, manifestly,
must the bundesrat be. And when we
come to Prussia, the mainspring of
this “democratic” empire, all the world
knows that its electorate is controlled
by the kaiser and by the ruling class.
The richer a man is in Prussia, the
more his vote counts. The pooiti he
is, the less he is considered. Equality
in representation is not even pre
tended. On this foundation of class
distinction and autocracy rests the
corner-stone of German democracy.
Is it a wonder that such a state is
absolutely controlled by an ambitious
line of autocrats?
War Secrets Are Disclosed
By Controversy At Capital
“The country will soon learn
whether he (Secretary Baker) or his
critics understand the business in
hand.’’
This significant paragraph ap
peared In the statement Issued by
President Wilson in reply to the ad
dress by Senator Chamberlain, Chair
man of the Senate Military Affairs
Committee, in which the legislator
said the war machinery of the coun
try had broken down.
President Wilson, while conceding
that “there have been delays and
disappointments, and partial miscar
riage of plan, all of which have been
drawn into the foreground and ex
aggerated by investigations,” insist
ed that “nothing helpful or likely
to speed or facilitate the war tasks
of the government has come out of
such criticism and investigation.”
The chief executive said, “the War
Department has performed a task of
unparalleled magnitude and difficul
ty with extraordinary promptness
and efficiency.”
THE DAY OF RECKONING
v By H. ADDINGTON BRUCE
Dully, almost with unseeing eyes,
he gazed out of the window of the
doctor’s waiting-room. It was late
afternoon, and a ceasless flow of
automobiles whirled up the fashion
able avenue, homeward bound. His
own car, a massive limousine of un
usual lines, wafted at the eurb. Pas
sers-by gave it quick, approving
glances. One portly old gentleman
paused to ask the chauffeur a ques
tion, evidently moved by admiration
for the car.
The man in the window noticed
this, but with no feeling of satisfac
tion. On the contrary, he stirred
uneasily.
“I must get rid of that thing,”
was the morbid thought that flashed
into his mind. “Strange how much
like a hearse it looks.”
He heard his name spoken, and
knew that the doctor was ready for
him. Eagerness battled with re
luctance, as he walked from the wait
ing-room into the office.
The first Impression he got was of
a pair of eyes, keen but sympathetic,
looking up at him from across a small
fiat-top desk. The doctor, for his
part, perceived instantly the anxiety
in his patient’s finely chiseled fea
tures.
“Sit down,” he said gently, “and
tell me about yourself.”
' “Perhaps I have waited too long in
coming to you,” began the other,
nervously. “But you know how it
is. I hated to admit to myself that
I was ill,”
“Yes. And your symptoms?"
“There are times, increasingly
frequent, when I have momentary
feelings of suffocation. It is hard for
me to get my breath.
"Sometimes I have attacks of dizzi
ness. I have queer coughing spells.
But worst of all is the pain I oc
casionally feel here."
He put his hand to his breast.
"Is it only there that you feel
pain?” asked the doctor.
"I have it also in my arm, at times,
my left arm, and in my neck, a sharp,
shooting pain. It does not last long,
but it is very severe.”
"I wish you would strip to your
wajst,” said the doctor.
The physical examination was long,
deliberate, careful. When the patient
had again put on his clothes, the doc
tor asked him:
"How old are you? Forty?”
"Just about. I shall be forty next
month.”
Then, with startling unexpected
ness, came the query:
"Have you ever had syphilis?”
The patient winced, flushed a little,
but answered candidly:
"Why, yes. I did have syphilis
when I was a young fellow in my
early twenties. But it was a very
light attack. I needed treatment only
a short time.”
"So you thought,” commented the
doctor, "just as so many other poor
young fellows have thought. Some
day, perhaps, young men will know
better.”
"What do you mean? The medi
ciirel took made me well quickly. I
have had colds that affected me worse
than that trouble did? But”—sud
denly appreciating the physician’s
drift —“was I not really cured? Am
I suffering from the late effects of a
youthful indiscretion?”
“I’m afraid you are,” said the doc
tor.
"And,” in a voice now trembling
with undisguised alarm, “?*• r-y cor.
dltion* serious?"
.“it might bo uniter than it
February 13
“To add, as Senator Chamberlain’
did, that there Is Inefficiency in every
department and bureau of the Goy*
ernmeht is.to show such ignorances
of actual conditions as to make it
impossible to attach any importance
to his statement,’’ said the President
In reply to the White House state*
ment, Senator Chamberlain made at
lengthy speech, into which he intro*
duced considerable confidential id. 4
formation given the Military Affairs
Committee in secret session behind
closed doors. This information about}
the United States Government’s wai;
plans and how they were progressing
thus became public through the col
umns of the Congressional Record,
Immediately after Senator Cham-i
berlain’s speech Secretary Bakeft
asked to be heard by the members
of the Military Affairs Committees
of both houses of Congress to whoM
he wished to explain in detail exacts
ly what the War Department had and
had not done since this Nation en«t
tered the war.
is,” answered the doctor
“Your heart Is not in the best con
dltion in the world. ;
“You will have to ease down in
every way possible. But do not fall!
into a panic. You may depend on]
me to do the best I can for you.’’
Alas! There was little that could
be done. Within a year the stricken!
patient was dead, from the suddenl
bursting of the enlarged arterial tubej
at the top of his heart.
In his sad fate there is a lesson for|
every young man. •
Had this doomed man of forty not]
been “indiscreet” in his youth, had’
he not through Immoral intercourse
contracted the germ disease knownl
as syphilis, his life’s ending would
probably have been altogether dis-J
f erent —and probably would have
been far longer postponed. i
As he perished thousands of other
men have perished, from a similar
cause. The syphilis germ lurking id
their system for years has suddenly
sprung into activity, attacking thd
heart and blood vessels. t
And once syphilis clutches at a>
man’s heart his chances of escape ar®
slim indeed. k
“Syphilitic heart disease,” say®
that eminent medical authority, Dr.|
Richard Cabot, “gives with one ex-'
ception the worst prognosis. Th®
syphilitic heart does not often survive
five years. j
"It is seen IN YOUNG AND MID
DLE-AGED MEN, far less often ini
women, almost never in children,
seldom in~the old.” ;
These are facts for all young men
to ponder. ’
Syphilis is easily acquired, but
with difficulty cured. Its imrfiediata
effects may not be serious. But its
remote effects may involve a terrible
day of reckoning, a sudden cutting)
short of life when life is
most successful, most rich in mean-]
ing. J
To be on the safe side, prevention’
of syphilis is imperative. And therqt
is just one rule for the sure pre
vention of syphilis: ‘
BE MORALLY CLEAN. '
SORROWS OF SALUTING
■
MT
/b w
-
. _
FRAMK HINCi
First Lieutenant—“ Why, what’%
the trouble, old fellow? Did you;
sprain your arm?”
Second Lieutenant—“ Worse than
th*'-, i walked down Main sFrcti.