Newspaper Page Text
Washington, D. C.
1941’s ‘GREATEST TRAGEDY’
You don’t have to wait for his
torians to record the fact that the
greatest tragedy of the year 1941
as far as this war is concerned is
the way the British have twiddled
their thumbs, watched the Russians,
and done almost nothing except
cheer.
Over three months have passed
smce Hitler sent his mechanized
masses hurtling across the Russian
border, and in that time the British
sent only a trickle of help.
Yet the British knew that pro
longed Russian resistance was the
biggest chance they had of defeat
ing Hitler. They also knew that
Hitler’s tactic always has been to
pick his victims one by one.
Yet realizing this, the British have
done virtually the same thing Poland
did when Czechoslovakia was in
vaded, what Jugoslavia did when
Bulgaria was invaded, and what
Turkey did when Jugoslavia was
invaded. They have merely sat on
the sidelines, sent 200 airplanes, plus
a mission to Moscow, taken a good
long rest—and cheered.
Second Front?
Meanwhile, the general staff ad
visers of both the British and Amer
ican armies have bluntly warned
that the Russians were sure to be
defeated unless a second front was
created against Hitler.
This second front against Hitler
meant, of course, a British expedi
tionary force landing in France,
Holland or Spain. This question
has been discussed carefully behind
the scenes, but the British have
wanted two things: one was tanks,
most of theirs having been de
molished at Dunkirk; the second
has been an American Expedi
tionary force to help them.
The British did not really push
this idea of an A.E.F., for they
knew politically it was impossible
for Roosevelt. But nevertheless they
did want company in attempting to
land troops on the Continent. They
had plenty of troops in England—in
fact so many that there has been
restlessness and bad morale be
cause of inactivity.
It is true that these troops are
not completely equipped and are
sadly lacking in tanks. But there is
considerable belief that they wore
equipped sulliciently to make a land
ing in Spain from Gibraltar; and
that in France the local people
would have risen up to welcome
them.
However, all summer long the
British have maintained an “after
you, Alphonse” attitude. Meanwhile
the situation in Russia has become
darker and darker—as every mili
tary expert knew was inevitable.
All of which brings up the vital
question of exactly who is the dom
inating factor in the now virtual
Anglo-American alliance. We have
thrown a very large pile of chips
into the gamble on a British vic
tory; yet no one seems to know
whether the British are taking ad
vice from us or whether we are tak
ing orders from the British. Presi
dent Roosevelt and Harry Hopkins
may know, but if so they have not in
formed those closest to them.
* * *
HITLER’S OIL PROBLEM
Most of the reports from Russia
look black; and to U. S. army ob
servers they have been that way
for some time. However, one en
couraging factor stands out. This is
the question of oil.
Without oil no army or navy can
move. And despite the tremendous
areas taken by Hitler in all Europe,
he still faces, two years after start
ing the war, almost the same oil
shortage as before.
Rumania, seized chiefly for her oil
fields, has a capacity of 8,000,000
tons annually. However, the Rus
sians bombed the Rumanian oil
fields so badly that production is
now down to about 4,000,000 tons or
less.
Germany itself has a synthetic
gasoline production of about 3,000,-
000 tons, making a total annual pro
duction today of about 7,000,000 tons.
On the other hand, Germany is us
ing oil and gas to operate its army
at the rate of about 25,000,000 tons
a year, most of which has come
from reserves. It is estimated that
Germany still has reserves on hand
of 10 or perhaps 15 million tons.
All of which means that the real
pinch will come next spring. In
other words, Hitler has enough oil
and gas to last through the win
ter, but by the end of the winter he
absolutely must take the Russian
oil fields of the Caucasus. In fact,
he is sure to stage a terrific drive
to take them even earlier. The tre
mendous Nazi sacrifices to take Kiev
and Odessa all were because those
two cities are the path of the Nazi
march to the Caucasus.
Russian Chances.
During the coming winter, howev
er, the Russians should be able to
hold out. The Caucasian mountains
are high and rugged. The Russians
have a huge force in this area.
The British also have rushed
troops through Iran to the border of i
the Caucasus.
However, if Hitler’s gasoline situ
ation is even more desperate than
indicated above—which may be
quite possible—then he is almost
sure to put the pincers on Turkey
harder than ever before in order to
drive on the Caucasus.
|
Youth Work Defense Program
A new national defense work experience program of the National
Youth administration, designed to fit young people for jobs in defense
industries, has been put into operation. This new effort, the “Youth
ff orh Defense Program,” for which congress appropriated 560,000,000 ,
will supplement the regular out-of-school work program of the National
Youth administration. Young people , 17 to 21, who are N. S. citizens,
out of school and in need of employment, are eligible.
Here in the NY A work center girls learn, through actual on-the-job
experience, how to operate metal machinery.
Learning the elements of draft- Welding is one of the important
ing will help this youth in reading jobs in metal industries. The NYA
blueprints in the shop, is giving youth this experience.
Shoulder to shoulder the boys and girls of America are finding their
place in the defense program.
r
L . .. $ |
■ #' I
“The youth themselves are our principal product,” says Aubn
ff illiams, administrator of the National Youth administration. “The
have been made to feel that they are part of a social structure.”
America's youth learns correct work habits —one is being on time.
HOUSTON HOME JOURNAL, PERRY, GEORGIA
I
WKL'Wrv*. IlMtlUa * $
Eleanor Roosevelt
AN ENTERTAINING EVENING
We had an interesting evening as
we watched some short documenta
ry films, and then two gentlemen,
Mr. Charles L. Todd and Mr. Son
kin, who have been making record
ings of interesting folk songs and
dance music in the migratory camps
on the West coast, for the Library
of Congress, played some of their
records.
One, a song by a boy of 14, was
a gem, though he was covered with
confusion and ran away when he
heard it played! Many of the rec
ords, like the song written by a
woman about her trip from Texas
to the West, were heart-rending, in
spite of the fact that one could not
i help laughing at certain little twists
of language and expression.
These recordings are going to be
■ historically interesting, but the in
spiring thing to me is that people
can live through such hardships and
still have music in their souls and
the ability to express themselves
hopefully. Mr. Todd told me that
when they have a dance, or are
| happy, over the prospect of work or
I some small event in their daily
lives, these people apparently seem
| to be able to enjoy themselves with
complete forgetfulness of the past
and the future. They have learned
what so many of us do not learn—
that the present is the only thing
we really possess.
♦ * *
CHINESE PHILOSOPHY
That night I read a little volume,
arranged for publication by Stan
wood Cobb. It is called, “The Wis
dom of Wu Ming Fu,” and is a col
lection of his translated poems and
sayings. The Chinese philosophy
over the centuries has come to the
same conclusion as our migrants,
and they would agree wrth Mr. Fu
that “it should be our concern to
make each present moment per
fect.”
‘WE HOLD THESE TRUTHS’
The next da? was most beautiful
and four of us went by car to Sugar
Loaf mountain and basked in the
sun, with a beautiful view spread
out below us After lunch, in the
: shade of some trees, with the rocks
j as our seats we read aloud the
j preface to a Jihort anthology called
“We Hold Xnese Truths,” compiled
by Stuart Gerry Brown of Grinnell,
lowa.
This address impressed me, for I
know two pretty good representa
tives of what American citizenship
means, who are now in Washing
ton and who have had close associa
tion with this same place in the past.
This anthology is a collection of
documents, written by our great
men over the period of our whole
history. Documents which all of
us frequently want and should turn
to, to clarify our own beliefs.
One afternoon I received Dr. Juan
Carlos Blanco, the ambassador of
Uruguay and Madame Blanco, and
Mr. Fernand Dennis, the minister
of Haiti, and Madame Dennis. They
were my first diplomatic visitors for
the fall, and they certainly were
charming ones.
Secretary and Mrs. Morgenthau
dined with us that night, and the
next day Mrs. Morgenthau was
catching up on some of the civilian
defense work on which we are go
ing to work together in the coming
months. I find a wealth of volun
teers who are anxious to do some
thing useful, but I shall not be satis
fied until I begin to see people ac
tually at work in communities all
over the country. That is where
the real civilian defense must have
its roots.
By proxy, that day, I learned a
good deal about my new job, be
cause Mrs. Henry Morgenthau Jr.
met the staff in the morning, and
sat in on Director LaGuardia’s
meeting. In the afternoon, she met
with another group, which discussed
the complexities of the jurisdiction
of work. All existing organizations
will finally be drawn into a pattern
| where everybody will do his best,
with the least possible friction.
Anybody with experience knows
what this can mean in the way of
difficulty during the period of or- 1
ganization. A hundred times a day
I shall wish what I have so often
wished in the past, that human be- \
ings could be reconstructed over- i
night. If we would think only of
the objectives to be achieved and
never of the instruments to be used,
least of all ourselves, how much
more we could accomplish.
Great teachers through the ages
have tried to teach us that this is
the only efficient way of work
ing and, perhaps, in the end, the
only way through which any civili
zation can be saved. However, we
do not always believe these teach
ers.
• * *
‘DIGGING FOR MRS. MILLER’
i I read through a little book called
“Digging for Mrs. Miller,” by John
Strachey. It is an account of the
I experiences of an air raid warden
S in England. It is certainly different
from anything I have ever read by
| him before. He is dealing with facts,
whereas in the past he has dealt
almost always with theories. It is
a valuable little book and will en
able people to visualize daily life
for the ordinary man and woman
where total defense is required
Kathleen Norris Says:
Time Heals All Wounds
(Bell Syndicate— WNU Service.)
Ted’s mother came to stay with us and ran me out. We lived at an army post tmdl
became intimate with an army officer who was a married man. / teas carried away by
I his devotion to a lonely girl.
By KATHLEEN NORRIS
ONE of the hardest lessons
for an American woman
to learn is to leave any
thing to time. We are an impa
tient people, and whatever we
do must be accomplished in a
very fury of speed. Hundreds
of women go to Reno for di
vorces every year, only to
plunge into fresh matrimonial
experiments the moment they
are free. Decisions that should
be made only after months or
even years of planning and
praying, they reach in a few mo
ments. Having failed conspicu
ously in one attempt at wife
hood, they plunge into another,
sure that if happiness doesn’t
wait on one pathway it must on
some other.
But happiness and charac
ter and success in marriage
are things of slow growth. They
are never ready-made. It takes
months and sometimes years of
patient effort to work out even the
simplest domestic problem, and in
these days almost no marital prob
lem is simple. Impatience and
marriage never mix.
Threats of European conquest and
invasion from sea or air have never
given me a moment’s concern. But
the destruction of that all-important
thing—American marriage—through
the hasty and ill-considered action
of husbands and wives who flock to
divorce courts at the first sign of
trouble, is a real blow at the safety
of the nation.
Divorce Is an Evil.
Divorce is not a solution, it is an
unmitigated evil and it ought to be
used sparingly, like the poisonous
drugs that help pain, or the sur
geon’s knife that is employed only
in the last emergency.
Unless this national failing is
somewhat lessened, we are going to
be a nation without homes; and a
nation without homes is no nation at
all.
It doesn’t hurt children to grow
up in the care of a mother who is
silently enduring difficulties and in
justices. It hurts them irreparably
to be told by their mother that
Daddy is a bad man; and by Dad
dy’s mother that their own mother
is so selfish and vain that poor Dad
dy had to leave her.
In the beginning the men and
women who contemplate divorce al
ways assert eagerly that there will
not be this sort of criticism before
the children. But when those chil
dren, missing their father, shifted
uncomfortably about, trying to ac
custom themselves to a stepfather,
ask wistfully why their own Daddy
has gone away, then Mother has to
take a defensive attitude.
So she tells them how mean
Daddy was to her, wouldn’t give
her any money, and liked another
lady better than Mummy, and twist
ed her arm. And when they tell
their paternal grandmother this she
can only counter majestically,
“Well, Mummy doesn’t always say
what’s true, dear. She was very
unkind to poor Daddy. Don’t be
lieve everything Mummy says.”
The army of the children of di
vorced parents—that’s the army we
ought to fear. What possible train
ing in self-control, consideration,
patience can they derive from the
ill-disciplined man and woman they
call their parents? And how find
happiness against a background of
changes, recriminations, charges
and countercharges?
1
HOME DEFENSE
Far more terrifying than the
possibility of invasion by a for
eign army, says Kathleen Nor
ris, is the menace of divorce,
which is breaking up our homes.
More sinister than Hillers le
gions is the army of children of
divorced parents. But how are
we to prevent divorce? Patience
will help. Impatience is prob
ably our greatest national iveak
ness. We leap from one mistake
to another; we plunge into ill
considered marriage and hasty
divorce , . . Don't fail to read
Kathleen Norris’ uncompromis
ing discussion of the part women
can play in building one of our
first lines of national defense,
happy homes.
Here is a letter from a woman
who has made a series of hasty
mistakes, and who feels that to
make a fresh series would be the
way out.
“I am 28,” writes Em-Bee, from
Indianapolis. “I was married at
19, and have two sons, seven and
four. That first marriage was a
girl’s mistake; Ted seemed to me
the epitome of everything that was
wonderful, but I was too much of
a kid really to judge a man as a
husband. We were miserable from
the start, quarreling, making it up,
quarreling again. One of my babies
was delicate and the other unman
ageable, and we had very little
money.
“Ted’s mother came to stay with
us and ran things generally. She
ran them so well that she ran me
out and I went home to my step
mother, as I cannot stand the man
my own mother married after di
vorcing my father. We lived at an
army post and I became intimate
with an officer who was a married
man. I don’t excuse this, but I was
carried away by his devotion to a
lonely, bewildered girl of 24. This
gave Ted an excuse to ask for com
plete guardianship of the boys,
which was granted him. Floyd s
wife divorced him and we were
married.
“Ted died last December and his
mother has my boys. They come to
see me now and then, but we are
strangers. My husband does no
understand how a mother fee s
about her children. We have been
married three years and as yet
have no hope of another chil •
Ted’s mother, who is well fixed,
says she is going to take the boys
to another city and place them in
school, and Floyd feels that that is
a good thing for them. But they
are mine, mine, mine, and I W1
not have them carted about as
they had no mother.
Can’t Help Her.
“On the other hand, we have on y
Floyd’s pay, not sufficient for
many expenses connected with tw
growing boys. I feel strongly t a
I have made many mistakes 1
handling my life, and am anxio
not to make any more.
“What do you think of my present
plan of going to Reno for a £ t lvor^ j {
asking an alimony that will P® r .
me to learn a profession that
support my children, and suing n
mother-in-law for their c ■
Does that seem the best thing-
Em-Bee is not speaking honest,
when she says this, nor when
speaks of a mother’s feeling for ■*
children. Having broken up her
life and Floyd’s and Ted's and •*
children’s, no advice will s a ' e
now from crashing ahead m o ILJ
ther mistakes.