Newspaper Page Text
OPINION
®he Srttics
gainesvilletimes.com
Sunday, November 18, 2018
Shannon Casas Editor in Chief | 770-718-3417 | scasas@gainesvilletimes.com
Submit a letter: letters@gainesvilletimes.com
The First Amendment: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right
of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
JIM POWELL I For The Times
EDITORIAL
Building on a vision
Revitalization must be fair to property owners, taxpayers
[ THE ISSUE: The Gainesville City Council on Nov. 6 approved an ordinance
banning 30 uses in the city’s Midtown Overlay Zone, including homeless shelters,
crisis centers, coin laundry facilities and pawn shops. Existing businesses or
nonprofits that would be banned under the new rules are being grandfathered in. J
The leaders of Gainesville have
grand plans for the city’s midtown
area. As visions of a new skyline
downtown begin to take shape —
with Carroll Daniel’s new head
quarters and the still anticipated
Parkside condominium building,
both with first floor space reserved
for retail and restaurants — the
council seems to be shifting its eyes
back toward the portion of the city
just across Jesse Jewell Parkway.
The city is in the midst of pur
chasing, for $10 million, the land on
the midtown side of the pedestrian
bridge, and it has approved new
regulations for a midtown overlay
zone, a 350-acre area bounded by
E.E. Butler Parkway, Jesse Jewell
Parkway, Queen City Parkway and
the railroad.
City Manager Bryan Lackey has
said city officials want to see more
housing and retail in the area as well
as possibly office space and a hotel.
The city’s aim is to encourage that
by using the overlay zone to address
redevelopment, allowing properties
there to be treated differently than
others.
The midtown area is dotted with
empty storefronts and dilapidated
buildings. Pumping new life into the
district could raise property values
and give city dwellers new places
to spend their cash — both of which
translate into more tax revenue for
the city.
Some businesses in the area
already have bought into the vision
— with more than just words.
JOMCO Construction has remod
eled its building since opening in
midtown about two years ago.
J.R. Johnson, president of the com
pany, has said “the vision that the
leaders in the city have is starting to
play out a little bit.”
Jason Everett, owner of the
Gainesville Design Center, said
he’s also seen the area trending
toward more retail, “which is good
for people coming over from down
town as the square gets a little more
crowded.”
The list of restricted businesses
limit the rights of property owners
in the area, but some businesses
already were disallowed through
zoning regulations, including mini
warehouses, auto/motor vehicle
sales and service and sexually-ori
ented adult uses.
Meanwhile, the city is giving prop
erty owners more flexibility with
increased residential and mixed-use
options in the district.
Revitalization is an admirable goal
when done in a manner that is fair to
existing and new property owners,
and with an eye toward conservative
stewardship of public funds.
The city has spent a considerable
amount on its vision.
The city in 2012 spent $7.2 million
to purchase Hall County’s old jail on
Main Street in midtown.
The plan was that Corrections
Corporation of America, a private
company, would continue leasing
the facility for 14 years to operate
a detention center for immigrants
in the country illegally. The lease
agreement through 2026 would
“more than cover the expense,”
Gainesville Mayor Danny Dunagan
said at the time, noting the city would
break even in seven years.
But within a year, the CCA broke
its lease — the city’s agreement laid
out no penalty for that — leaving tax
payers on the hook for the bill.
By 2017, the city had demolished
the jail. The city still owes about $5
million on the property.
The city is now spending $10 mil
lion for the land on the other side of
its infamous “bridge to nowhere.”
Whether private investment will
follow remains to be seen, but with
so much public money tied up in the
revitalization effort, it is vital that
plans for moving forward are struc
tured to be revenue positive for the
city.
Enticing developers to the overlay
district with promises of long-term
tax breaks and special financial con
siderations is a risky business at best.
The suddenness of the city’s acqui
sition of the latest property after
years of awaiting the previous own
er’s proposed development, and a
lack of public discussion about plans
for the area, has some questioning
the city’s role in the process. Invit
ing increased public input and being
totally transparent in all land trans
actions will go a long way toward
alleviating any concerns.
Amid all the talk of revitalization,
there’s a nagging feeling about what
will happen to the people who have
been operating businesses like laun
dromats or those providing beds to
the homeless.
Society hasn’t eradicated the prob
lem of homelessness, and people still
need to shop at thrift stores and wash
their clothes at laundromats.
By banning them in this portion of
the city, these types of businesses and
nonprofits are likely to be pushed
into another area of the city, creating
a sort of economic segregation.
Pushing what city officials consider
to be less than desirable businesses
into ever smaller areas in the city
only reinforces the idea of a neighbor
hood on the wrong side of the tracks.
An alternative worthy of consider
ation is to control the quality of rede
velopment through building codes
and architectural requirements, so
an upscale neighborhood can still
have its laundromat or dollar store,
but with a design that looks like it
belongs.
None of the current business own
ers showed up to meetings about
the changes, but the city also wasn’t
required to notify the property own
ers about the changes, so the likeli
hood they knew about the proposal
was slim.
By grandfathering in the current
establishments, the character of mid
town isn’t changing overnight. But if
revitalization comes, rent prices will
increase and some may be forced out.
If the city is willing to invest mil
lions to demolish a jail and buy a
vacant piece of property, we’d like
to see it make some investments to
help businesses already in the area.
A rising tide should lift all boats,
but it doesn’t always work out that
way without someone providing
options for those who may otherwise
get priced out of buildings they’ve
rented for years.
Lee s work a
reflection of
age he lived
Stan Lee, the reinventor of the comic book,
died Monday at the ripe old age of 95.
Comic books get a bad rap, although not nearly
as bad as they used to. There was a time when
comic books were the cause of an all-out moral
panic. After the release of psychiatrist Fred Wer-
tham’s book “The Seduction of the Innocent,” the
Senate held hearings to grapple with the alleged
moral rot of comics, which were supposedly fuel
ing juvenile delinquency
and moral degeneracy.
Batman and Robin, you
see, were secretly gay.
Superman was an un-
American ersatz fascist.
“Superman (with the
big S on his uniform — we
should, I suppose, be thank
ful that it is not an S.S.)
needs an endless stream of JONAH GOLDBERG
ever new submen, crimi- goldbergcolumn@
nals and foreign-looking
people not only to justify
his existence but even to make it possible,” Wer-
tham wrote.
The Comics Code Authority was established in
1954 to protect children from consuming Satan’s
apple in cartoon form.
As silly as all that was, at least the anti-comic
puritans took comic books seriously. And while
Wertham et al. went too far in the wrong direc
tion, comics are an important window into our
society.
Prior to Stan Lee and Marvel Comics, super
heroes were fairly two-dimensional characters.
Superman was, well, just super at everything. He
fought for “truth, justice and the American way.”
He was also a kind of super-moralist, always
knowing instantly what was right. Some writers
claim he was the first “social justice warrior.”
In Superman’s first adventure (Action Comics
No. 1), long before he ever battled Lex Luthor,
he saved a woman from being wrongly executed,
stopped a senator from being blackmailed and
protected a woman from her abusive husband.
“Delivering justice, protecting family and stop
ping corruption, Superman represented the
newly expanded New Deal state,” observed Ben
jamin Moore in The Washington Post.
The New Deal was a real-world example of
political philosopher Michael Oakeshott called
“politics as the crow flies” — a rationalist
approach that tries to use the state as an active
participant in life to achieve desirable ends
without much concern for the means. It should
be no surprise that Superman transitioned from
New Deal warrior to World War II warrior. He
was fighting Nazis long before American troops
were.
Lee grew up professionally in this “Golden
Age” of comics, but he also rebelled against it.
While a member of the so-called Greatest Gen
eration, Lee better represented the more ironic
attitudes of the postwar generation. His superhe
roes struggled with their powers and their moral
responsibilities. Spider-Man, the quintessential
Marvel character (at least until the introduction
of Wolverine) was a nerdy, angst-ridden teenager
who only reluctantly accepted his role and the
idea that “with great power comes great respon
sibility.” Lee’s heroes quarreled with each other,
had romantic setbacks and sometimes even
struggled to make the rent.
The baby boomers, Lee’s target audience,
were plagued with a great unease about living
up to the legacy of their parents’ generation.
“We are people of this generation,” begins the
Port Huron Statement, the 1962 manifesto that
largely launched the ‘60s protest era, “bred in at
least modest comfort, housed now in universities,
looking uncomfortably to the world we inherit.”
They believed they were special but didn’t know
exactly what to do about it.
This kind of ambiguity suffused Marvel’s sto
rylines. The X-Men were mutants, a government-
persecuted minority community, bitterly divided
between assimilationists and rejectionists. Their
powers were a thinly veiled metaphor for the
confusion of puberty. The Thing, constantly
harassed by a local street gang, hated that he had
become grotesque, but when given the choice
of becoming human again, he opted to keep his
powers.
Captain America debuted in his own comic
by punching Hitler in the face on the cover,
but by Vietnam he was emoting, “I’m like a
dinosaur — in the cro-magnon age! An anach
ronism — who’s out-lived his time! This is the
day of the anti-hero — the age of the rebel —
and the dissenter! It isn’t hip — to defend the
establishment! — only to tear it down! And, in
a world rife with injustice, greed, and endless
war — who’s to say the rebels are wrong? ... I’ve
spent a lifetime defending the flag — and the
law! Perhaps I should have battled less — and
questioned more!”
Of course, there was plenty of fighting, derring-
do and onomatopoetic “pows,” “bamfs” and
“snikts. ” But future historians looking to under
stand the near-century of Lee’s lifetime would be
well-advised to look at his life’s work.
Jonah Goldberg is an editor-at-large of National
Review Online and a visiting fellow at the American
Enterprise Institute.
(The Ernies
Founded Jan. 26,1947
345 Green St., Gainesville, GA 30501
gainesvilletimes.com
EDITORIAL BOARD
General Manager Editor in Chief
Norman Baggs Shannon Casas
Community members
Cheryl Brown Mallory Pendleton
David George J.C. Smith
Mandy Harris Tom Vivelo
Brent Hoffman
To submit letters: Send by email to
letters@gainesvilletimes.com or use
the contact form at gainesvilletimes.
com. Include name, hometown and
phone number; letters never appear
anonymously. Letters are limited to
one per writer in a month’s time on
topics of public interest and may
be edited for content and length
(limit 500 words). Letters may be
rejected from readers with no ties to
Northeast Georgia or that address
personal, business or legal disputes.
Submitted items may be published
in print, electronic or other forms.
Letters and commentary express the
opinions of the authors and not of The
Times.