Newspaper Page Text
’ IS
JSi AabL 3# ia ds**.' Jfo
♦-
r o.a t!ic t'r <!tra' l ’nn • n
judge schlep . —v» c staffed»» our
Vi.-' i.i.r we were it.iiy m posst-ssion of
Ir—, _r.• Sehiey’s opinio.:s of tins decisiou
■Kite S.i|.r Court in the case ol W or
against the Mulit of (loorgiit*
l'r .in ,1 v, ig rumors, and an intimation i.
« ir- of the puiiho gazettes, «r linvc anii-
Cip*'-e<i an attack ti|>oa lion on tins suii
j;-ci. As early therefore as tiie month «*t
jtf iv, we took occasion to pi ace ourselves
I'll;V in possession of .fadge. Sc It tty’s cx
pl c.t views on the subject. i lie expcct
has Uc<*n made through tile col
uin sos the .Southern Recorder. M ;j,<r
Stocks, the President of our Senate Had
niso received the impression from some
tourc ■, that Judge Schley supported the
decision. A correspondence passed be
tween them in which Air. Stocks became
perfectly satisfied that the charge was
false—and lie lias frankly said In the
Ju Ig ', that lie would take occasion to
contradict it, win never it should be
brought up in conversation befor him.
e now have it in our power to do Judge
{Schley the most ample justice in tins mat
ter Though his letter lias been lying ev
er since tlie latter part of Mas, as we did
not choose to come forward m defence <d
■So honorable, open, a. (I upright a man
till lie should have been attached. — At e
now give the writer ol liie Recorder, and
the people of Georgia, the undisguised
and clear views ol Judge Schley iuinsell,
written to one ol the Editors ol tins paper
on the 28th may 1~32. AN hat will Ins
enemies sav next ? Vv dl they •ol call
him a Xuliifieri Should it become ne
cessurv, we \v ill publish the Report drawn
up by Schley m the Legislature of 1830,
to which lie alludes in his letter But we
think ins letter sufficient to clap an extin
guisher opotL this false rumor against
him The following is his letter—
Avgusta 28th May, 1832.
Dear sir —l was in the net ol sealing a
letter written by me to Maj. Stocks upon
the subject of the report in circulation its
regard to my opinion of the decision in
the case of Worcester vs. the State of
G-orgin, when your letter ol the '2lst
inst- on the same subject, cante to hand.
I had received a letter from a Iriend in
AA'ashingtou City informing me that Maj.
Stocks, whilst there on Ins way to the
Baptist Convention in New-York, stated
that I sided with or approved of the decis
ion of the Supreme Court of the United
States in the Case of Worcester vs. the
State of Georgia.—From what source
Maj. Stocks derived his information I
know not; and as lie was circulating a
report founded, to sav the least ot it, on
a misconstruction or misrepresentation of
toy opinions, I deemed it a duty I owed
to him and tnyselt, to undeceive him in
that regard, and I have accordingly done
80.
So far from having expressed or enter
tained an opinion in favor ot the decision
of ’’it- Supreme Court, I have uniformly
held and avowed the reverse. And tins
too, long before the cast ol Worcester oc
curred. My opinion upon the subject of
the State’s right af jurisdiction over the
Cherokee country was formed on mature
investigation a. and deliberation whilst a
member of the Legislature in 1830, and
acting as Chairman of a subcommittee
oh the state of the republic, to whom that
subject was referred. And by a reference
to tbe report of the Committee on ' hat
subject which was drawn up by me, you
will find that 1 declared the right of Geor
gia to jurisdiction over all the territory
■within her chartered limits, and over nil
persons within those limits, whether “white
tneu or red men or Illaclc men." —The
reason for this opinion you will find at
large in the report.—When the decision
of the Supreme Court come to hand, 1
read it over and over again with the view
of ascertaining whether the opinion 1 had
formed in 183!) and expressed in the a
hove stated report was right or wrong; or
in other words, whether there was any
reasoning in the decision of the Court
which could change rny opinion, and
convince me that l was wrong. And I
now declare to you, as I have repeatedly
said to others, that so far from changing
may opinions that decision has confirmed
them; and convinced me that Georgia is
right in her course.—Yes, so confirmed
am l of the justice of our cause, that I
have said, that however presumptuous it
might seem in me to make the assertion,
yet 1 did assert that 1, even I, could in
one hour convince any men whose minds
are not preoccupied or prejudiced either
way, that the decision is wrong, illegal ,
unconstitutional and oppressive, totally
destructive of the rights, the honor, and
the sovreiguty of Georgia.
And yet notwitstanding the fact these
are my opinions and have always been,
since 1 first investigated the subject; and
which opinions have been publicly ex
pressed both by writing and speaking, 1
can bear from 'ill quarters of the state,
"that / hare declared mi/self in far or of
the decision of the Supreme Court."
Ifnw is tins to be accounted for? Charity
compels me to believe that the originators
of the report must have misconceived my
views and opinions, fori am unwilling
to believe that any man with whom I have !
ever conversed on the subject would
knowingly and willfully assert what he j
did not lielievf.
WM. SCIILEY.
GENERAL MSAVN AN.— The great
miriet if t, ft t.ff the fronds of this gentle,
man, ari l the man if statements afloat in |
relation !•> teis ••pinions, hart ranted him\
to submit his views to the people, 7he u j
drt now bfjvrt i, m Constituents, irho can
;<• gi Jar tin uncle. s — t\ L .
To the Fiiitars of the Feotrai L ilian:
Gentlemen —As many ot' my constitu
ents have manifested much solicitude to
ascertain my views in regard to the pre
sent erila al state of atfiurs in our beloved
country, I seek this occasion, to coiiinui
nicaie them through the medium of your
paper.
In the first place, I believe, that any
iiieinlu r of the I iiion, upon her own re
sponsibility and as a free, sovreign and
iinicpendniit Btate, lias the right to pur
sue such a course as she may deem the
nest calculated to arrest the mischievous
and destrtictiv elfects of the odious, une
qual, and unconstitutional tariff act of
IStt.
2 i, I believe the proposition for assem
bling delegates in convention from all the
counties in tins Slate, at Milledgeville, in
November next, to take into considern
tton our grievances, and the proper rem
edy for their removal, is a wise and pru
dent measure ; and I am willing to abide
bv the decision of the convention, if rat
ified by a majority of the people.
3d. I am opposed to a separation of
the States, unless we are driven to this
expedient, by continued roliei v and relent
less oppression ; anil rather than support
any measure which I thought calculated
to weaken the Union, I would acquiesce
in tin- present tan If, bad as it is, fora few
years longer, provided 1 could now be
convinced, that ;t would gradually, and
in a short time, he reduced to a proper
revenue stun ar!
4th. 1 am opposed to a Southern con
vention, for I am apprehensive that in it
we would havo to encounter the wiles of a
“magician,” and the projects of high ta
riff, constitutional tariff, and protestando
men ; and like the I 'lihidelphia conven
tion it would proveto be an abortion, and
somewhat similar to the miserable hoax
that was got up at Baltimore in the
month of may last.
fitli I believe the tariff hill of the last
session of Congress, as much opposed to
the true spirit of the constitution, and as
burdensome upon the protected articles
used in the South ns the act of 1828; and
viewing it m this light, I felt mysel con
scientiously hound to record my vote a
gainst its passage, and I rejoice from sub
sequent rt th-ction and examination, in
having done so. At the same time I
have the charity to believe that many
Southern men who voted for the tall were
governed by good motives.
DANIEL NEWNAN.
August 29th, 1832.
rr.OSI TIIF FEDERAL L’NION
TIIE BALDWIN MEETING.
Saturday last was a great and glorious
dav for Baldw in. Her citizens have put
down Nullification by an overwhelming
majority !! W e publish to day the pro
ceedings of this meeting. The manner
in which they are reported renders it diffi
cult for the reader to midersiand the ex
act shape in winch the resolutions passed.
AVc will remark, that J dge Lamar’s pre
amble and resolutions passed with such
amendments as he willingly accepted. In
point of principle they remain the same.
Tilts county, has never before been the
theatre of such a public meeting. Al
most the whole of the citizens, who could
add talent or respectability were present.
The noise and clamor, kept up by the
Nullifiers, produced much fear for the re
sult, in the bosoms of many worthy citi
citizeiis. They justly thought the occa
sion demanded their presence at the meet
ing. Matty attended who are generally
in the habit of abstaining front visiting
j such places. In spite of the protracted
discussion, they remained till the adjourn
ment. They had set their hearts on put
ting their seal on Nullification ; and they
made good their determination, by a ma
jority of three or four to one. AVe shall
no longer, we trust, be viewed as the hot
lied of this dangerous doctrine. Our neigh
bors of South Carolina will direct their
toasts, and their plaudits to other quar
ters.
From the Georgia Journal.
Some feeble attempts are still made in
several quarters, to keep up before the
people of Georgia, the name of I*. P.
Barbour, for the Vice Presidency. We
should be gratified in knowing what is
the real object, of such movements. Not
the election of that gentleman. No one
entertains that idea. We have too much
respect for the understanding of that por
tion of our fellow citizens, individually
and collectively to inqiute to them the
madness and folly of supposing for an
instant that Air. Barbour can he forced
| upon the States of Main, New-Hamp
slnre, New York, North Carolina, Ten
nessee, Mississippi, Kentucky, Indiarina
and Illinois North Carolina, his great
est hope, and A’irgiina, his native and res
ident State, declare their utmost fondness
for the man and his principles, hut deem
it due to the great republican interests of
the Union to postpone Ins claims ; and
yet a few people in Georgia persist in urg
ing Ins name, with a pertinacity for which
it is difficult to account.
Dismissing therefore all fruitless spec
ulation as to motive, let us look a moment
to the effect The whole number of elec
toral votes under the new appointment is,
according to our recollection, 283—requi
ring for a choice,l42. The whole repub
lican force may lie taken at 171. Now
it Mr. Barbour could obtain all that lias
ever, vv itliiu our know ledge, been cl limed
lor him ; and some of which it is now pos
itive I v ascertained lie cannot get; and it’ j
lie could i.hian Georgia, which it is e
qui llv certain he cannot g« i, Ins utmost
aniout, (all of winch uu.st be amputated j
from l.is friends,) would be GD. 'i lie
vote would then stand,
For Seargent 109
“ Aan Linen lii.i
“ Barbour 09
And no one having a majority ot the
Vt hole, the Election goes into the Senate,
and that body we know will elect Air.
Seargent. And so those good people of
Georgia who are endeavoring to get up vV
keep up a Barbour schism in Georgia,
would have the pleasure of reflecting that
they had assisted Mr. ( lay and the Uni
ted States Bank as far as within them lay,
hi electing their V ice President, it they
can succeed in getting this election into
the Senate, they will have the further
pleasure of reflecting that they have con
tributed their mite to the election of a se
cond officer of the Goverunien, who will
be always ready with Ins talents, his inlhi
cnee and his easting vote w henever neces
sary to impede & embarrass the action of
\ tiie government; •Sc, at times, to prostrate
| ihe best objects of the administration, anti
I cripple its energy in defence ofti.ose .State
rights in which we, at live South and par
! ticularly in Georgia, have so deep stake
j and at present so lively an interest; and
I they will have assisted to sow s eds of dis
| trust and jealousy, which w ill foster and
| flame into disunion of the great republic
jan family. That these are the legitimate
! co a seep ten ces of keeping up the. name of
Air. Barbour, may he denied by the lead
! ers of that measure; hut they can hardly
(repel from the minds of the calm reflect -
jingpart of the community, conclusions
| so plain and manifest.
AVe hnvt ever entertained a high regard
for the talents, the virtues and the doc
trines of Mr Barbour. AVe now of no
act of his life that we disapprove, except
the present one ot pi muting las name
and his influence as » solvent to break
down the unity of the republican party
Lr. day and his friends arc of opinion
that it is the only solvent of sufficient pow
er to do this, if vve may judge from the
fears which they have publicly betrayed,
of Ins taking down.
But Mr. Van Buren is a Tariff man !
lie is for protection ! And so is President
Jackson. Is it fair to presume that Mr.
Van Buren who voted for the Tariff act
under instructions, more a tariff man than
Jackson who voted for it without ?—The
truth is that tli- re-election of Jackson af
fords the best prospect of bringing down
the tariff to the revenue standard; and
does any man really suppose that Vn ll
Buren differs from him on tins point ?
Suoh is not Jackson’s opinion, or he
would not believe as he dot s, that they
would so perfectly harmonize in their ef
forts to preserve the rights of the States
and the Union of the States. For our
own part we should have preferred Mr.
Barbour. But shall we stickle for even
thing ?—Shall we yield nothing in the lib
eral spirit of compromise to onr brethren
who are fighting our battles with ns, and
for us? Shall we childishly alienate and
cast off those Great States whose wishes
and feelings are engaged for Van Buren,
|as much as for the President ? And ti
| nallv, is nothing due to the President
I himself? He is acquainted, perhaps bet
ter than is any person else, with Mr.
Van Burea’s view's in the present posture
of affairs ; and he is certainly satisfied of
his aide and efficient co-operation in the
great constitutional objects of his admin
istration ; and asks his aid to accomplish
those objects. The people must indeed
judge for themselves; but they will admit
j the President to be a competent witness,
and will receive Ins opinions at what
they feel them to be worth. Shall we
not defend the administration, and the
republican phalanx at the point where it
has been attacked ? or shall we suffer our
selves to do the business of the opposi
tion—and play the very cards that Clay
and his friends would put in our hands,
by keeping up a schism among ourselves?
Monroe Walton Cos “Gpi 10,1832
Falsehood corrected. —A report ha
ving been circulated that I was an “advo
cate for the Protective System,” or at
least friendly to it;” which if uncoutra
dicted might w ith persons not personally
acquainted with my feelings, do me an
injury, 1 take tins method to declare that
wheresoever or however it originated, or
by whom propagated, it is wholly and in
conditionally false —nor can I conceive
how it ever was thought of, unless from
my open and uniform opposition to Nulli
fication, a doctrine which I believe to he
neither constitutional nor peaceable. I
always have been, and still am op|Mised to
the protective, system, or any Tariff recog
nising the principle of protection, and w ill
go as far as any man in resisting or reliev
ing ourselves of its burden, (short of Re
volutionary measures) to w liich [ ant most
decidedly opposed, and shall he, until I
loose all hope of a returning sense ofjus
tice in our National Councils.
TIIOS AV. HARRIS.
of papers throughout the
State friendly to the cause of truth, will
please give the above one insertion
FRENCH MARKET COTTON.
H I*, subscriber will with to purchase from
■ new crop in Ihe Fall about 2,000 l.alea
choice ( niton for the tench market —lt most
be clean, well ginned, in ißpmre hales not less
Ilian 400 lbs. and not over 450 lbs in strong ba.r
ft * n g
niuv 19. G. W. DILLINGHAM.
G J Met’Ll SKI Yis imsmmiilv emupelli«
to lie absent the duties of IpH school, therefore
will be suspended for -i s!,e,i _v, , M .. t ; |
A. Hfticlnuriit
W 1 t spend Ins leisure hours in ihe
"T execution of 1.i1.V i. H.y M TXT. It.
VTltlTl\<-
Os si v ile* ,- i olloii —• r ui.- iimih latr\t>.
ply s tlir ( OLt.'MBU* HOOK STOHth
August 1-f v
i jj£ S's bP fi<a sjfrtz ii-a AT.
SATURDAY. SEPT. 15. IK2.
n».\y; ui:ssiomif /•:/./•: < 7v <>. m
UNION CANDIDATES.
James M. AVavne, ol'Clmtlmm,
(Jen. J as. C. AV atson, of Muscogee
Maj. G. AV . Owens, of Savannah
Judge AV. Scmi.lv, of Richmond
I>. M. Stewart, of Glynn
Gen. John Coffee, of Cherokee
Cot., .las C'l cruel, of Franklin
JrnoF.Tito.AV. Harris ofAValton
Charles E. Haynes, of Hancock,
Sentiments on this subject not yet authen
tically known to us.
Henry Branham, of Putnam,
Thomas F. Foster, of Greene,
Roger L. Gamhle, of Jefferson,
George R. Gilmer, of Ogh thrope,
Richard 11. Wilde, of Richmond.
Nullification or Disunion f andidates .
Augustin S. Clayton, of Chirk,
Gen. Daniel Newnan, of Henry
Sf.arorn Jones, of Muscogee,
M. B. LAMAR Esq. of Muscogee.
are authorised and requested
to announce, Duct. HUNT, as a
candidate to represent Muscogee county
in the Convention to be held at Milledge
ville, on the 2d Monday in Nov. next.—
Doct. Hunt has consented to serve the
people if elected, upon the earnest appli
cation of many of Ids fellow-citizens,
who are opposed both to the Taritf, and
to the doctrine of Nullification.
{ arc authorised to say that G.
E. TI.IOM AS, Esq. upon the application
of many of Ids fellow citizens, has con
sented to serve the people of Muscogee
county; if they desire it, in the proposed
Anti tariff Convention, to lie held at
Milledgeville, on the 2d Monday in No
vember next.
Sept. 8, 1832.
[for the democrat.]
Mr. Editor: —Reports are frequently
circulated of late in the up country, unfa
vorable to the health of tlie town of Co
lumbus, and calculated to greatly injure
it, and if false should be contradicted.—
A few days since a person direct from Co
lumbus, stated that there was eighteen
new cases of fever on the day lie left town
—since which, 1 have seen a gentleman
of known veracity, who states the report
to be wholly unfounded, and that there
had been hut one death in town, for up
wards of a month. A little attention to
this subject weekly by the board of Health
or editors of newspapers, would entire Jv
counteract the bad effects of these »n
--founded report^and be of great service
to vour town. Merriwether.
A writer in the Inst Enquirer pretends
to consider the invitation to the meeting;
of the 30th ult. as of a general charac
ter. Notv that’s hI! fudge. Why the
writer knows and tbe people know,
and every body knows, that the Nullifi
ers are not the friends of tbe I’nio'a;
and as the invitation was only extern
tied to such, the Nullifiers could not
have been invited■ Besides, the leading;
Nullitiers knew very well, and the wri
ter knew very well, by whom that invi
tation was sent out; and his object in
sending it out; that it was expressly to
consult on measures proper to be adop
ted to counteract the influence which a
late meeting of the Nullifiers might have
on public opinion abroad. Ami if we
deemed it of sutfieient importance, we
could establish by legal proof, tlv; fact,
that tbe Nullies drummed up their re
cruits for the avowed purpose of pre
venting this object being effected . To
say that the meeting was intended to be
n general one, is all nonsense; just as
if the two parties bad not taken ground
—had not assumed names, and become
known by their names! Why there
was not a nully of any information ;it
the meeting, but what knew that he
was not invited, and that he went there
on purpose to raise a row.
Now as to the abstract right of every
individual in the community, to attend
a public meeting of this sort, we shall
at this time say nothing. Suffice it to
say. that since the division of the com
munity into parties, it has been deemed
convenient to permit each party to hold
their meetings separately, without in
terruption from the other. And. after
this practice has been obtained an tl been
acted on, it is certainly indecorous and
unconrteous for either party to violate
an implied understanding. Suppose
for one moment that a contrary prac
tice should prevnil: suppose that when
one party called a meeting, the other
party shouid concert a plan to rush in
upon them, obtain a mastery by mini-1
hers, mid interrupt their proceedings; j
wliut would be the consequence? Why,
uproar and confusion, if not violence j
nail bloodshed at once? Actuated
by feelings of delicacy, ns well is by
a love ol order, the Union party have I
acted on this implied understanding, j
and have stood aloof from the meetings
of the NuMlfiers, allowing them to get
together and nullify among thenuelves I
IIS much as they pleased. When the
niillics held their meeting at the close !
of the court, though n feeble band, did
the Union men rush upon th< m * They
did not ,• they attended to their own bu
siness. And certainly they bad r.-la
to count, and tint count, u-Kin a corres
ponding courtesy, on the pint of their
opponents. How their e vpeetafions
were realised, vve have sera.
But vve would not charge mV those who
attended that meeting, and who took part
with the nullies, with having gone there
for the purpose of creating confusion ;
vve know such is not the fact. JAinnv re
paired to the courthouse on the solicita
tion of some of the active nullies, nithout
reflecting on the subject, or coiisideniu'
at all. the object of Inc limiting. Bome
were told that the Yankees weie about to
rise, and must be put down; others that
Tariff resolutions were to iie brought for
ward, and they must go aid vote them
out; others, that it was an old party strii«-
gle, and they must show tlien> which side
was the strongest. Thus, crow ds arrivin'*
tit the court house, in the midst of ihe
confusion, clamored for tin ir leaders with
out know mg the cause of contention.
Tims it happened that several union res
olutions were voted down in Coliin.hue
where a vast majority of the |K o ph
for the union up to the huh! Thus it
happened thatilie nullies were backed bv
men who are ever ready to go too h and
toe-nail against nullification !
As to the assertion of this writer, that
the number of the Union party at tliis
meeting did not exceed thirty, ‘and ti ~t
then were more than a hundnd null f. rrg
present, vve reply without hesitatio. , that
it is altogethern fiction. That tl.inv I
- should have withstood n,0,.„
than one hundred nullies, who assembled
expressly fora row, should have . leetcff
their officers, maintained their me; t ng„
passed their resolutions, and fimdlv
edout the nullies—why it is at least sav
ing a great deal for them. And vve hope
the union men every where, will always
be found of thf same materials—thirty
more than a match for a hundred! that’s;
all.
PUBLIC MEETING.
on Thursday last
The Nullies have had their great meet
ing, and nullified. But it is not ia their
nature to do a tiling openly and above
hoard. They had all along' talked about
a dinner; invi'ations were sent through
the three states, Alabama, Georgia, and
So. Carolina, to those of their own pro
fessions to meet and dine with them. Con
sequently, the assemblage was s lect; such
met with the nallies, as the nullies had in
vited by name. And as the nullies invited
nullies, w liy it happened as a matter of
course, tnat it was only a nullification al
together.
But when it appeared that a large col
lect on had been assembled in Columbus,
; it was very-adroitly proposed to c<> i«.rt
! the assembly of nullies, into a public m et.
j mg, for the purpose of openly disemso »
j public affairs! The nullies c died over
their company to the Methodist Church,
| threw open their doors and mviteti the
I people to come and ta e part in tin u i s
j cussiotis. The Methodist Church was at
(one tune nearly full, perhaps there were
500 people, nullies and all, present. But
a- the nullies had been principally invited
n happened ns a matter of conr.-e, ,} mt
they formed the greatest propoition of
the meeting. Several distinguished U
iiion men were also noticed irTriit n->,
lily. Judge Shorter offered a set of w *o
i lotions asserting the doctrine ot Nuliifi*
j cation m its broadest sense. U he j, ast y
I "? tlce which time permits us now to take
ol tins meeting, it will be impossible . veu
to give an abstract of the interesting and
i able debate which ensued on these resolu
■ tions. Judge Wayne offered an able and
triumphant argument in vindication ot Ins
vote in favor of the tariff of 1832, i„
i swer ton statement of one of the Reso
lutions: and if his charge on the doctrine
ot South Carolina nullification, was not
equally triumphant, it was equally able
: and conclusive. About four o’clock tho
I meeting ad journed for dinner, to meet a»
i gain next day.
The next day the meeting again as
sembled at the hour of ten o’clock, but
with greatly diminished numbers. Those
who had been invited to dinner, had got
their dinner and gone home— such of them
as did not feel any particular interest in
the fate of the resolutions. The resolu
tions were supported by Judge Shelter
I Col - Jones, and Mr. Lamar. They were
| , " ,s ‘wered by Col. Iverson, Col Thomas,
and Judge AVavne.
The debate continued till |oiv* after
candle-light o>, Friday evening; and at
the time the question was called, tv, saw
scarcely a single countrv genthmanor far
mer present. They had gone berm be
fore dark. The meeting at ibis time was
elaefly composed of the Nullifiers invited
imm abroad, many individuals from Ala
bama and, vve believe, some from S. Car
olina—and the idle and curious id.out
town. The whole number present may
have been 150— not exceeding 200. 1,,
such a collection it could not have been
doubted that the nullifying Resolutions
would have passed nearly unnniiuou.lv.
I hey cannot however be represented as
the voice of Muscogee county. 'Fbe peo
ple of Muscogee had nothing so ,(«> with
their passage, and will speak a different
language on the first Monday of Oc'oher
hut they should only go for what they
are worth—-the language of the nullies of
Alabama of South Carolina, and other
places Who chose to gather together and
nullify on tin waters of the ClintH.lionche,
Judge ( 'l.'iy ton, sr. vs the Federal Union,
• n lus letter to the Augusta committee, tells
the iq.le, ,f « wish to have tin Tariff
nu i Ift a nd, I! <y utlist -said nullfiers to Con#
grctn.