The Augusta daily herald. (Augusta, Ga.) 1908-1914, February 14, 1909, Image 9
|SpS 0 *4 . vv OL' <-&sJmk %-^mk .. M ALTHOUGH we have been led by comparatively easy stages from ' the Empire gown with Its girdle ascending toward the shoulder blades in the back, to the Dlrectolre with Its waist line crowding the bust, It Is In spite of the many indications of medie val tendencies, something of a shock to find ourselves suddenly over whelmed, and as it were whirled back through the centuries, to come up breathless and wondering, face to face with faithful reproductions of thirteenth century robes with their uncompromising severity, revealing every line of our too seldom faultless figures, with never a frill or a frou-frou to beguile and mislead. Surely women can now be released from the stigma of vanity, for no style could be more trying to the greater number or more becoming to the favored few. All the Winter my letters and sketches from Paris have been leading In this direction, but I have had some hesita tion in launching these ideas, think ing they were a little too extreme and Do Men Regard the Domestic Woman as ‘A Woman to Avoid?’ MR. COSMO HAMILTON, a brilliant English playwright and drama tist, had written an amusing ar ticle which was reproduced in this paper the other day, in which he de clares that the name of the domestic woman Is anathema, and warns all of his fellow men who wish to enjoy their lives In peace to flee from her. He tells of the miseries of the poor henpecked man who has to wipe his feet on the mat before he enters his own door. He depicts the sufferings of the husband whose wife is always after him with a dustpan and a broom; who may not smoke In the parlor for fear of injuring the curtains; who dare not lie down upon a couch lest he muss the sofa cushions, and whose whole comfort is sacrificed by his wife on the altar of cleanliness and neat ness. Therefore, argues Mr. Hamilton. If you would be happy tHough married, give the double cross to the dear, demure domestic girl. These be bold and iconoclastic state ments, but they are worthy of profound consideration because they fall from the Ups of a man who represents at least one viewpoint of his sex, and he raises the Query: Do men really dislike domesticity In a woman? Is the domestic woman, after all. not the pearl of great price as a wife that we have been led to suppose, but a tiresome killjoy that makes her husband's life a burden by her petty exactions? In a word, is the domestic maiden the one to avoid when a man goes to pick out a wife? Leaves Girls in the Air. These words will fall with the dull, cold thud of despair upon the ears of the mar riageable young women of to-day, because they offer another proof of how difficult It is for a woman to really find out what a man likes in a wife, and what qualities a girl should cultivate as a first aid to the altar. For years and year 3 donv :tlclty has been held up as the goal toward which jfApdiaeval Tendency inSprinpfashiiini |U t&Jfflttfitfasliiend/eNewYaMressmaknj^A AA By DOROTHY DIX a maiden who wanted to marry should struggle. Men have celebrated the vir tues of the woman who knew how to kr-ep a clean house and cook a good dinner, and old bachelors have even taken refuge behind the bulwarks of domesticity, and declared that the rea son that men didn’t marry was because the giris of to-day were taught every thing except how to make a home. All of this has sunk deep into the fem inine breast, wherefore women have taken up the cult of domesticity. Cooking has been established In the public schools as a necessary part of the curriculum, and there is no girl left, except a fore ordained spinster, who can’t do things with a chafing dish. It’s All Love’s Labor Wasted. Ana now it appears that this is love’s labor wasted; that men are bored by do mesticity; and one of their number has come boldly out and asserts that the domestic woman is a woman to avoid. It is certainly discouraging to women, for it shows that they are as tar off as ever from having solved the problem of what a man realy likes in a woman. Of course women have always had an inkling of the fact that before mar riage domesticity was not the lodestar it was popularly represented to be. Any observer could see t-hat little Fluffy Kuffles, who didn’t know how to boil water or sew on a button, and who sat in the parlor reading Marie Corelli and keeping her hands in a nice, squeezable condition, had ten men flocking around her; while industrious Jane, who had taken the prize at the Housekeepers’ Fair for the best bread and cake, and was mother's helper, was left to pursue her tasks alone In the kitchen without being interfered with by any beau at all. It has also been a matter of common knowledge that the girl who had best fitted herself to make a good wife gen erally never got a chance to be any kind of a wife at all. But these have been supposed to be the vagaries of a young man’s fancy, and it has not disturbed our faith that the Ideal wife must bo as domestic as the cookbook, for a man’s ante-nuptial and post-nuptial demands of a woman are as different as poetry and prose, as a souffle and roast-beef and potatoes. So it is jarring, to say the least of advanced for the majority of women, and knowing that there are hundreds of women who wish to dress well and even handsomely who have not the taste or Inclination for extremes. Now that the Spring models are being shown and everything savors so strongly of this long past time, I need no longer hesitate to advocate tho lines which predominate. Personally, I have long been fasci nated with the middle ages, and dili gent searching in the old costume books has been a source of great de light. Comfort seems to have been tho keynote of the dress of the ladies of the thirteenth century, but comfort from their point of view may have been rather far removed from the twentieth century Idea. And I have been led to wonder if some over-zealous person w’ould soon launch the gorget, or wimple—l am not sure | which Is correct —but it moans the \ drapery which swathed throat and ; \ head crossing under the chin and | f pinned up to the hair by large orna mental pins. They wore rats, too, in their hair, only they didn’t call them that, I suppose, but pads over which the hair was rolled, to give a firm foundation on which to pin the drapery. This wimple was bound to the hair by a filet. Then there was the tall cornucopia shaped head dress from the end of which floated a long veil, sometimes covering the entire figure, very pictur esque. and recalling fairy princesses, but wouldn’t It be uncomfortable in a taxi! I was much amused to hear that the wife of one of the early French Kings inaugurated the guimpe, w'hen most wom en showed bare necks, because her chest was flat and her neck skinny. Forhnps it would be wiser not to re mind the fashion exploiters in search cf novelties of those long oversleeves which swept to the bottom of tho gown, for every woman who has tried to manip ulate a tea table in flowing sleeves knows it, to learn from so distinguished an authority that domesticity after mar riage Is as little alluring to men as In the days of courtship. Nor 1b confirmation of Mr. Hamilton’s theory wanting. Only a few days ago I heard a most intelligent and success ful man speak with disgust of the sacred subjects of the clean hearth and the well-spread table. “Pooh!” he exclaimed. “With a good hotel on every corner of the street, and an excellent restaurant In the middle of the block, what does It matter whether a woman knows how to cook or no? “L l i er u ? re plenty of p |ac « 8 tor a man to get all he can eat. What, he wants In a wife is companionship—somebofiy that wifi be cheerful and entertaining and charm him Into forgetting ail the worries ?o n ugSt r wHh n,1 an l8 d a f;*- ab?e Pe ° PU “ 6 h ‘ 3 ™^ n 5 oubt l dlsr ’ however, the majority of men do not take this ultra liberal view of matrimony. Most men marry to get ?v"r e^ and a bo !" e ‘hat Is not a trave, ty on the word is a place that Is kont lio ~a nd c, f an and orderly, and Is „ r !!l a ov / r , by a woman who is , cook and knows how to set a good table. But It Really Isn’t All True. Ray what you will, domesticity Is the little tin god that sits up aloft over to, home; for love very soon files out of the window of the establishment where everything Is higgledy-piggledy, and where a tired man comes home at night to un swept rooms and unmade beds and to dinner that would give dyspepsia to an ostrich. Cupid has choked to death on tough beefsteak and watery potatoes many a time, and there’s no grounds for divorce so common as the grounds in the coffee pot. In spite of this. It Is true that domes ticity, per se, does not attract men. They like the results, but fhey loathe the process. They demand that the house hold machinery shall run without a hitch, but they also desire not to see the oiler at work, lubricating the bearings. In short, then, men want to avoid the domestic woman, hut not her works. They desire the impossible—a woman who has cooked dinner, hut who never smells of the kitchen. how disastrous it Is to one’s best china. In all these feverish changes how one does admire the men, with their stead fast adherence to their never-varying clothes, and have you ever realized that the Japanese and Chinese have not varied their style for centuries? There was in the thirteenth century a fashionable effect which I have lately seen indicated in a walking suit, although the old name was not given, that of the “dagged costume,” where all the edges were cut out in little squares or leaf shaped pieces which must have fluttered gaily in the breeze. However, there Is one thing to be thankful for—their skirts were not so tlgrt around the bottom, and our skirts are showing a corresponding tendency to widen, consequently they are becoming much moie graceful. In a recent French fashion paper n writer, who must have been a man, gave vent, with apologies to tho fashion writer, to a wail for the lost allurement of the petticoat, and the lack of coquetry in the lady of the maillot, or knickerbocker, when she took off her dress skirt. It is Impossible for anyone to predict with certainty, but 1 feel per fectly sure that women will return to the saner point of view in regard to clothes and wear what Is most becoming. If the close-cllr.glng skirt is her best effect she will stick to it, and if she feels that the fuller pleated or scantily gathered skirt Is kinder to her figure, she may feel equally assured of being in fashion. French model gowns are invariably long in the skirt, but one must remember thut driving in Paris Is much more com mon and much less expensive than in America. Now, that sleeves are so frequent ly made of the material of the gown, the sleeveless coat Is one of the Spring novelties, and very attractive they are, too. Coats and skirts are not nearly so often seen as tho one ple-e dress and coat, uno can see why these dresses are called cas socks. for they frequently resemble a priest’s gown, with their severe unfit ted look, buttoned well up to the chin. Only a priest would be scan dalized at tho daring little bits of embroidery and fancy braiding. A number of these one-piece gowns have a straight band of trimming across the back of the skirt about ten inches below the waist line, from which fall narrow, scant pleats. One of my latest Paris sketches has this effect, the band stopping abrupt ly at the hips. The same band crosses the shoulders from the mid dle of the back, turning squarely at the bust line to continue down each jrifi H I fz llwUSm f 11 * * yimi jS JHhlc: JpHHra i LJJKm jp M HSBKj «ldo of the front to the button of the skirt. Among the many beautiful gowns at the opera, my feeling for color was much gratified by a confection in blue and pink. The satin under-dress was of a lovely shade of pink, which was nearly covered with a tunic of rather deep blue net. This tunic was*ln turn covered with a second tunic, heavily embroidered In gold and held at the waist line with a beautiful band of gold embroidery. Although there were many handsome gowns at the Automobile Show, gener ally covered with evening wraps. The most perfect color scheme was a little mahogany-colored pickaninny at one of the exhibits who wore a gorgeous orange-colored uniform, which toned In agreeably with his rolling eyes and glistening teeth. In Paris, the play “Le Hoi Dago bert,” with Its wonderful costumes, seems to have given a decided Impetus to the medieval trend, and the photo* graphs shown to-day are Interesting In this connection. I have been favored with a glimpse of some of the early straw hat models and sketches of three of the most novel ones are shown on this page to-day (E, F, and G). In spite of the prophesied revolt aguinst the extremely large hat, ad vance hints for summer hats show that, with tho ndvent of warm days, fashionable women will return to large hats heavily trimmed with flowers, al though small flower toques will be very populur. Artificial fruits are vory plentiful, luscious looking bunches of grapes, currunts, and even gooseberries. Flowers were never more lovely, dull faded roses and brilliant colored ones. • aggcd natural looking violets with foliage, and prim set bunches of th< flower alone. Hyacinths and tiny tea roses. very natural looking, ami bunches of small button roses vie with hydrangeas and wistaria blooms in shaded violet. All sorts of shapes nro seen, tho newest being tho Mario Louise, tin Cabriolet, tho flower pot and tho Hen ry VIII. Black, as usual, holds the palm for popularity, and black Jet trimming is in high favor. One model hat in finely fluted black tullo is orna mented with llttlo strands of black pearls terminated with a Jet lozenge Around tho crown Is a quadruple string of largo black pearls. JANR. (A) (AA) —Merovingian model In dull sage green by Margalno La Croix. c •«* wife 1 I '■ A /jfe 1 % \ ' K'; i \I w m X «iiKb 4 ! ivi The braided not band, which Is over a lining of copper color, follows the long waisted line, below which the skirt falls in narrow side pleats. The side view of this gown shows where the band of trimming stops on the hips, while the back is laid In pleats which extend nearly to the neck. (Bj—A Redfern gown In medieval mode, which has the close fitting up per part covered entirely with brown and gold embroidery simulating a coat of mail. The neck Is filled with chif fon guimpe, while, falling plainly be low the girdle of dull gold beads and Jewels, is a skirt of bronze satin. (C) The priestly influence Is shown In this tailored suit of gray chiffon mohair, with Its long straight effect. The embroidered bands are done In self-toned crewel 6tltch. (D) —Superb evening gown designed by Margaine La Croix, worn by the Queen In Le Roi Dagobert, the French play. Over a straight gown of peach silk are five panels of net, studded with iridescent beads and paillettes. Each panel is furnished with a fringe | nU 1 szsi I jaSS/L Jmtft of the same beads, and strands of beads lace the panels togcU- Fes toons of shaded pink roses t. ;ross the bust and pink chiffon sleeves. (E) —The medieval influence is quite i jpparent In this, which is very sug 'gestive of a Crusader’s helmet In Its square broad top. The crown is of bright green hemp straw, and the Tight Lacing Not to Blame for Appendicitis. A MONO flu* vfirlcnis long standing In dictments against corsets and light lacing ban been that they are the cause of appendicitis. This Indictment wan ‘‘quashed” the other day by Dr. John It. Murphy 1 n a lecture before the Chicago Medical Society. “Whatever causes appen dicitis nobody knows,” said Dr. Murphy, “hut It certainly has nothing to do with corsets because It Is four time* as common among men us among the corset-wearing sex. “Some people charge It up to rheumn tlstn, others to measles. There are per sons who believe that overfed people yet It, others that underfed people are most liable to have the trouble, but no surgeon has ever discovered Its real cause, “But we do know appendicitis Jn all of Its nature and In the destruction that It produces. It Is more common In Hummer than In Winter. It Is something Unit vo cannot run away from, because It Is found In all quarters of the globe. Thorn are countries, perhaps, where they still call it inflammation of the bowels, hut that Is be cause they have not recognised It as appen dicitis. ‘ There Is no dl.e*:; «• where the symptoms are more uniform, and it Is oim of the easiest of discuses to diagnose lu-t there is the pain, than the nausea, the f ore- •JANE" r*«4* -ro m c m»< «*e*- & <• KO. * Hr I II W 9 9 L ***** 1* I fcsai~—i Vs* 1 I - brim, which Is cut up In the baok the Game as In front, la of black rough straw, joined to the crown by large cut Jet cabochonß at Intervals all the way around. A fine large aigret of green rises straight up at one aldo of the front. (F) —This model Is made of a soft taupe color In rough straw, the brim decidedly Napoleonic In shape, com ing well down over the ears on each side and flaring up away from the heir front and back. On the right side spreads a magnificent group of taupe colored tips. Two long streamers of black satin are sewn, without any softening loops whatever, on the edge of the brim In the back, whence they are tied around the neck. (Q) —This severe little hat of roee colored hemp is simply trimmed In two shades of rose, the lighter ehadee in flat loops from left to right In front, and the darker shade coming In the same flat loops across the’ back and ends at the left side. This shape ie very flat and narrow from back to front, the sides being distinctly pointed. Dens due to local pressure, and, lastly, the elevation of the temperature. The appen dix can float around In a large space, and while It :h generally on the right si Jo It bag been found on the left side. There are times when the pain entirely disap pears and tie patient may still tie on the lightning < press \<t death. The suddea cessations of pain are <1 no to ruptures which allow rj discharge Into free cavities, temporarily relieving the pressure. “It 1* a dangerous disease. l,e-ause ths appendix can till up and the patient dlo In thirty one hours. Therefore, procrastina tion Is the cause of the greatest mortality In appendicitis, inflammation of the bow el , which was the name It was formerly known by, was an extremely futal disease, and appendicitis would he Just a* fatal If It were not, for the surgeon’s skill In re moving the appendix before It had *n op portunity to rupture and send Its ;lery nnd poisonous dls'hnr.:** Into the vital organs of the body. Sometimes nature protects life by causing a discharge Into natural channels. 'The mortality rate with medical treat ment alone I* about 20 per cent, while it Is less than one-lifth of ! per cent under sur gical treatment If operated on In Its Inclp bujt stages. No medicine has ever bee* discovered that will cause a curs.’*