The Presbyterian of the South : [combining the] Southwestern Presbyterian, Central Presbyterian, Southern Presbyterian. (Atlanta, Ga.) 1909-1931, March 03, 1909, Image 7
THE PRESBYTERL
VOL. I. ATLANTA, OA.,
This Week-?
Page
Tne Pharaoh of the Exodus 4
Our Bright-Side Letter 4
Faith and Health 5
Death of Dr. Cuyler F.
The Proposed Amendments 6
Several Reasons ' 7
Anniversary of Cyrus H. McCormick 8
What Think Ye cf Christ 9
The New Theology 10
A Tribute to Presbyterianism 11
A Resting Place For Our Ministers 20
Publicity Campaign In Atlanta 21
Editorial Notes
Suffer a special notice to our subscribers. The consolidation
of the papers which form the "Presbyterian
of the South" took effect January I, 1909. At once
we undertook to rearrange the lists so that each subscriber
should have his proper credit on the united
paper. Each one will find, on the address label of
his paper (this week and every week) a notice of the
date to which he has paid. We ask that each one will
refer to this date and make whatever remittance is
due for the current year.
nr.. i icnson, in urging people to take a religious
paper, says, "You will not always agree with it; it docs
not always agree with itself. No man will always agree
with himself unless .he is an incorrigible Bourbon or a
hopeless imbecile."
The frequent changes in recent years in the Day of
Prayer for Schools and Colleges have marred its general
observance. Cannot the Presbyteries do something
to bring it again into effective use?
If the truth will not draw, and if the truth will not
it. i ?
*-?..?!y me Dcnever ana promote piety in the believer's
life, how may one reasonably expect coffee and ice
cream and oysters and stereopticon shows to bring
about these results?
\
No subject under discussion at the recent meeting in
. Pniladelphia of the Western Section of the Presbyterian
Alliance excited more interest than that of Christian
education on,l +i,_ x.-c ,v- -l
a..u me iuiuic ui mc tnurcn coue^s.
So much had been sai^ about the great temptation put
before the small Christian colleges to lower the flag
and abandon their connection with the Church in order
to secure the benefit of the Carnegie Pension Fund,
that it Was refreshing to hear a minister of the Northern
Church declare that only two Presbyterian institutions
had yielded to this temptation and severed their
connection with the Church: one west of the Mississippi
river and the other south of the Ohio.
i - -
IN OF THE SOUTH
MARCH, 3, 1909. NO. 9.
This is a golden sentence, with a practical end to it
worthy of thought. It is from "The Associate Reformed
Presbyterian." "If the discovery of good in
others were as common with Christian people as it
should he, a new word would have to be coined similar
to the word 'fault-finding' in form but opposite in meaning."
Dr. Crapsey's latest lecture on "The Birth of Jesus"
has for its fundamental principle the notion that the
Christ of the Christian religion is not a man born of
woman but a spiritual personality born out of the religious
nature of man. He tries to distinguish between
the birth of Jesus and the birth of Christ.
In striving for "success" and worldly pomp and
glory, the Church loses the respect of the world, and in
her frantic efforts through all sorts of devices to recover
the loss and to win back those who have rejected her,
she only makes herself ridiculous in their eyes. There
is a better way. Christ's promise to be always with
those who go into all the world is 'conditioned upon
their going there to preach his gospel. There is no
rUllPr nnm? r\r /lotrioa ...HI -1
? WV. V ,\.y. niai will U1 dW IIO.
A church that turns its Sunday evening meetings into
an "open parliament/' and invites the public to diagnose
disease and suggest a remedy, shows what is the matter
without any need for further explanation. It has simply
forgotten Christ and his gospel, the "power of God
unto salvation." Would Christ or the apostles have
called in the Scribes and Pharisees and others who
hated Him and His work to tell Him why He did not
have a large following?
A good Christian woman was pouring into our ears,
a few days ago, a tale of wot. Something turned her
4.1 1-^ i-- - ? ? - ' * *
iiiuuguts towards a sadder case, and one which she
had relieved, just before. Her whole attitude, countenance
and voice chapped. It was borne in upon her
that God had given her the opportunity to alleviate another's
woes to fortify herself against her own trouble.
One happily suggests that it would be well to substitute
the enquiry, "What would Jesus have me do?"
for the present popular "What would Jesus do?" "Doing
as Jesus would do" is something nobody can be
sure about. No one can tell exactly what He would
have done. He gave great principles, and in the record
i- * '? * 1 1 *
ui iijc gu;>pci5 siiowcu now ne wouia act in certain
cases, but he did not cover all the possibilities of situation
and relationship in life. "What would he have
me do?" is far more practical a question than "What
would Jesus do?"