The Presbyterian of the South : [combining the] Southwestern Presbyterian, Central Presbyterian, Southern Presbyterian. (Atlanta, Ga.) 1909-1931, September 08, 1909, Page 3, Image 3
September 8, 1909.
against it only and solely
ly consequences of this h<
he ignored the moral cri
were we astonished when
would not concern themse
of those who commit thi
when such knowledge wa
This is an extreme case
institutions would be thi
the associations of the stud
derelictions that are a sc
young. Among these, by
spirit of worldliness. \V
idle hint is sufficient to nu
fully before entering his c
-
i nere are a plenty of sell
which to select.
MORE ABOUT "TH
Dr. Eliot's address at
Summer School of Theolo
tised. It consisted of a s<
mental Christian truths, a<
long ago announced by paj
modern infidelity. Decryi
chief of dogmatists, withoi
authority or argument to si
negations consist of the d
ligion, a veritable moral a
supernatural is totally rejei
fication of remarkable hut
between God and man. X
ncss as tne iruit 01 earthly
change of character; no c
our frail humanity. Purel
love to man is the comprel
is positive in this pseudo-r
(lent, of course, spoke for 1
ances savor much of an i
ting before the public, lit
Gladstonian alertness in g
he conceives to be new anc
But rash as these assun
ing to the religious faith ol
the highest character and
age, they are logically the
ern "liberal" teaching whic
about Harvard, and on to t
imported stock. Let the <
posedly Christian teacher
granted as premises and tl
inevitably follow. It is c
respect all sorts of religiov
century, but that means th
spect the destruction of fai
all religion.
It may interest our rea
men comments of evangel
Says the Lutheran:
1. "It will not be bound bj
say religion la no longer to be
works only. Hence It will ma
Bible teachings about God, al
demption in Christ, about eterr
cepted or not. He who accepti
1
l
THE PRESBYTERIi
on the ground of the earthorrid
sin. In his remarks
minality of it. Yet more
he declared that his faeultv
:lves to seek for knowledge
s sin, but would act only
s placed before them.
We apprehend that few
is criminally neglectful -*f
lents. But there are minor
>urce of temptation to the
r no means the least is the
e use no space to specify,
ike the parent enquire carehild
at an unknown school.
rvr?1e rvf K?/vU .. ?1 ? ?
bii^ii Mtiiiudiu irotn
E NEW RELIGION."
the close of the Harvard
gv, has been widely adverjries
of negations of funda:companied
by assumptions
jail writers and repeated by
ng dogma, he becomes the
it deigning to furnish either
itstain his deliverances. The
enial of all authority in rend
spiritual anarchy. The
cted. There is to be no deinan
beings. No mediation
o promise of future blessedj;
?_ i! -
discipline; no supernatural
livine energy wrought into
ly natural love to God and
tensive summary of all that
lew religion. The ex-presitimself
alone, and his uttertbnormal
fondness for get;
has frequently exhibited a
etting to the front of what
1 popular movements,
lptions may be, and insult:
the millions who represent
intelligence of this or any
"assured results" of modh
emanates especially from
he westward, but bred from
assumptions of certain sups
of the liberal school be
he conclusions of Dr. Eliot
onsidered magnanimous to
is opinion in this twentieth
at it is magnanimous to reth,
and the abandonment of
ders to peruse some speciical
papers.
' dogma or creed.-' That is to
a matter of belief, but of good
ke little difference whether the
bout man, about aln, about relal
life and eternal death, be acb
them all Has no better chance
\N OF THE SOUTH.
of pleasing God and doing His will
all. "By their fruits ye shall knc
difference does it make whether j
cucumber seed, or a poisonous be
not believe alike, what's the use c
2. "The new religion will not
There will be no supernatural ele
liance on anything but the laws <
the Bible,?without whose lndire<
himself would have walked in da
better off than the American Indii
Bible. The horizon of our spirit
ries fixed by what we can here see
this is reducing religion to lowest
better off with such a religion thi
was before he was transformed by
3. "In the new religion there w
markable human beings. God wil
intermediary will be needed." Tb
the divinity of Christ brought pr
wonderful educator indeed who
called "the mighty God, the Pr
where Christianity with all its re
be today if the apostles and all CI
ent bad believed as Dr. Eliot does
4. "The new religion will not a
to present ills by the promise of I
so there is after all no gateway
sorrows and sufferings of this pr
beyond? Verily, how mistaken
mivst have been to hold out to tt
the promise of blessedness unspe;
sort of religion were to be preach<
year, how many people would be
to it?
5. All that seems to have a s<
this new religion is that it "will 1
commandments"?love to God and
God? How are we to know him i
can he be revealed If there is no
which to read of him? So this n<
from faith and brings us to two
before these it leaves us helpless
to have the flower and the fruit ?
cut off from its stem. What a wit
soon be.
But Dr. Eliot wields an enormo
tional world and therein lies the
of his before a body of intelligen
seldom had a more potent hearing
lips. But the Church of Christ wi
gospel of Christ and him crucifledfoollshnes8
to men, is yet the pow
of God. Between the teachings oi
uiau n^aar anu me leacuings OI 1
much as a man, and very otherw:
not be difficult for men. who feel i
ture, to choose. Really, Dr. Elliot's
as old as unbelief itself.
The United Presbyterian c<
ment:
Dr. Eliot, president-emeritus of
his light shine along the path of tt
a long way from being the light ol
undertakes to put himself on a le>
in providing a way of redemptioi
should be sure that he is the be
no s 11 on in not attempt to ieaa his
In the heavens, or undertake to d<
man race until he has something
It is but natural for a creedless p
Dr. Eliot's new religion starts on
rabble of negations, telling the w
lieve. It will not be founded on 4
or spiritual." Therefore this new
prophet will have no foundation t<
no definition of remarkable hum
.
3
than he who rejects them
>w them," and hence what
rou plant an apple seed, a
rry seed. As all men can
if believing anything?
be based upon authority.
>ment; it will place no re)t
nature." So away goes
.?. i ay ? U1 11*111. UI". C.UOI
rkness. Hence we are no
in who had nature for his
ual world has its boundaand
feel and touch. Surely
. elements. Are we really
in the South Sea Islander
the gospel?
rill be no deification of re1
be so immanent that no
ius with one fell swoop is
ostrate. That must be a
can unmake him who is
ince of Peace." Wonder
markable conquests would
iristians down to the pres7
ttempt to reconcile people
future compensation." And
of relief leading from the
esent life to joys that lie
Jesus and Hts followers
le weary and heavy laden
akable hereafter! If that
?d in the churches for one
left in the pews to listen
jmblance of vitality about
je based on the two great
love to man. But who is
f he is not revealed? Howother
book but nature in
ew religion takes us away
great commandments, and
and undone. Thus we are
)f religion, but it must be
Lher?d, wilted thing it will
us influence in the educa
sadness of this utterance
it men. Unitarianlsm haa
than it received from hia
U go on preaching the old
-that gospel which though
er of God and the wisdom
t one who spake as never
Jr. Eliot who speaks very
Ise than Jesus did, it will
the limitations of their nai
new religion is very old?
ontains this racv com
Harvard, has been letting
te immortals; but it comes
r the world. When a man
'el with Jesus of Nazareth
a for the human race he
arer of a divine message,
fellow men without a star
estroy the hope of the hu
a 1? ?*- -?
ucvici iu uui iu us place.
rophet to cry, "No creed." \
it# career with a merry
orld what It must not beauthority,
either temporal
testament of the Harvard
a rest on. "There will be
an beings." There will.