The Golden age. (Atlanta, Ga.) 1906-1915, November 22, 1906, Page 8, Image 8
8
The Golden Age
(SUCCESSOR TO RELIGIOUS TORUM}
Published Ebery Thursday by the Golden Hge Publishing
Company (Inc.)
OFFICES: LOWNDES “BUILDING, ATLANTA, GA.
Price: $2.00 a Year
WILLIAM V. UPSHfXW, - ■ - - Editor
A. E. RA/fSAUR, - - . Associate Editor
LEK G. ‘BROUGHTON - - - Pulpit Editor
Entered at the Post Office in Atlanta, Ga.,
as second-class matter.
To the Public: The advertising columns of The
Golden Age will have an editorial conscience. No
advertisement will be accepted which we believe
would be hurtful to either the person or the purse of
our readers.
Students of the fashions may have decided that
with the winter would come some change in the
styles; but an advertisement of “shirt-waists one
third off” -would indicate that the styles -will be
the same as during last summer.
Young Mr. Pulitzer insists that he recently
struck Mr. Hearst a blow in the stomach in a
business ofiice in St. Louis. Mr. Hearst says there
is no foundation to the story whatever; that he was
not struck by Mr. Pulitzer. Under ordinary con
ditions we would believe Mr. Hearst, but it is
possible that a man who has had a terrific blow in
the neck may not be able to notice a little touch
on the stomach.
Mrs. Sage’s Problem.
Mrs. Russell Sage is trying to give away in the
proper manner the immense fortune which Mr.
Sage left her. She wishes do bestow it more
upon individuals than upon institutions. She is
very.much perplexed and is having some difficul
ty in choosing beneficiaries. She has had some
few suggestions as to the bestowal of the money,
but she needs a few more. If ever there was a
path of duty, this is an open one. The situation
must appeal to every reader of The Golden Age.
It is a fearful responsibility, a big undertaking
to give away this much money. It is more money
than many of us ever saw. It is more than most
of us will ever own. In silver dollars placed side
by side it would reach a great distance; no telling
how far; and there are other interesting facts
connected with this great fortune; but that is not
what concerns you, reader, and the writer of these
lines. The real issue is the proper bestowal of
it. Here the path of duty is plain. Write to Mrs.
Sage; give her your suggestions. Let her know
that you are interested; offer her any assistance
in your power. If you feel that you are willing
to assume the responsibility of taking some of the
money yourself, speak out and say so. The troub
le with this world is that we are not willing enough
to make sacrifices for the sake of others.
The Passing of Kipling.
A great number of people are abusing Mr. Rud
yard Kipling because he is not writing better mat
ter now. They have a positive picnic knocking his
“Stalky & Co.” and some later works. It is
true that Mr. Kipling’s hooks since the “Soldiers
Three” and similar stories of Indian and army
life, have not had the movement and grip and
ring that these books had; and it is undoubtedly
true that his popularity has waned. In the field
in which he at first achieved success he is and will
ever be without an equal. He immortalized Tom
my Atkins and he created a poetry with a jin
gle and clank to it that is in a class by itself.
He became a fad; and, like all fads, has passed.
He has turned his hands to other tools and his
workmanship is not as attractive and as accurate
ly finished as formerly. But, granting all this,
it is no rpason for his being so coarsely abused
pS bp wap jecently by 4 Yale professor, who said
The Golden Age for November 22, 1906.
it was a pity Mr. Kipling did not die during an
illness he suffered some time ago. His soldier
stories and Bai rack Room Ballads are a distinct
gift and ornament to the books of the time; they
probably will not endure as literature, but the
Recessional will. Think of the men whose names
are household words now who are remembered by
but one effort. Robert Gray wrote a number of po
ems—but not more than one man out of every
ten well educated men knows of anything he
wrote besides the Elegy. John Howard Payne
wrote and did many things, but who knows of
anything besides “Home, Sweet Home”? As
present day instances, take away the Girl from
Gibson, and there would be nothing left; Rem
ington could not successfully enter any field ex
cept that in which he is pre-eminent—the portray
al of the Western man and horse, the round-up,
the gun fighter and the army man. If Mr. Kipling
writes no more, he has already given us much.
He has struck a broken zone and is hunting for
iihe main lead; when he finds it he may open a
richer mine than any he has yet developed.
Our New Cabinet Minister.
The recent appointment by President Roosevelt
of Oscar Strauss, of New York City, to the cabinet,
is one that has caused universal comment through
out the country. The fact that Mr. Strauss is a
merchant of high standing gives him peculiar fitness
for the portfolio of commerce and labor and apart
from all other considerations it is safe to predict
that this man will fill the high office given him with
credit to himself and profit to the administration.
It is well known that Mr. Strauss has been the
real head of the great retail business house of “R.
H. Macy & C 0.,” the largest department store in
New York City, and a pioneer in its peculiar line.
The wise and efficient management of Mr. Strauss
and his two brothers, who compose the chief mem
bers of this firm, has, however, been but an inci
dent in the varied phases of his career. During the
administration of Grover Cleveland, Mr. Strauss
held the posi'ion of minister to Turkey and he
has always been regarded as a desirable represen
tative of our government. His grasp of affairs is
good, and his high sense of personal honor is bet
ter. Apart from his business or political career, he
has won quiet distinction also, as a philanthropist,
one of the notable features of his work along this
line being his distribution of free ice to the poor
of New York City and his campaign for pure milk
at a merely nominal cost. He has accomplished
more toward the latter lefoim than any other one
individual.
Mr. Strauss is a Jew. In a recent interview when
this fact was mentioned to him in connection with
his appointment to the cabinet, he said that while
he was the first of his race to hold such a position,
it was of value merely as a proof, not that his race
was at last receiving political recognition, but that
an individual could receive recognit : on regardless of
his race or creed. The practical demonstration of
this fact in the ease of Mr. Strauss’ appointment
certainly reflects credit on the present administra
tion and would seem to mark a decided advance in
the direction of appreciation for the personal quali
fications of the man, regardless of any unusual con
ditions surrounding him. Such a just and generous
attitude on the part of Mr. Roosevelt cannot fail to
win our approval and commendation.
J. Walter Bennett.
The daily press announces the death of Hon. J.
Walter Bennett, city attorney of Waycross, and we
feel constrained to say that in the untimely going
of this stalwart Christian lawyer Georgia has
lost one of her most splendid illustrations of noble
citizenship. The Editor of this paper feels a deep
sense of personal loss. He can never forget the
generous speech of rythmic beauty which the
young lawyer employed to introduce the young lect
urer to his first Waycross audience more than a de
cade ago.
Since then we have watched Walter Bennett’s
course with the pride of a treasured friendship, re
joicing so see him become not only a leader at
the bar, but more than all, an acknowledged power
in exemplifying and directing the forces of Christ
ian citizenship in a rare community whose very
name has become a synonym of civic righteousness.
The world needs more Christian lawyers and lead
ers like J. Walter Bennett. May his princely man
tle fall on many ambitious young men who will
be as ready as he was to lay the twin powers of
genius and eloquence on the altar of unselfish de
votion to the cause of God and humanity.
Two Great Gatherings.
This week will hold within its compass the most
intense interest on the part of the majority of the
people of Georgia, because of the meeting of the
North Georgia Conference at Milledgeville and the
Georgia Baptist Convention at Cartersville. The
M. E. Conference, about five hundred strong, will
mingle amid the classic and historic shades of
Georgia’s foinner capital. Bishop Ward will pre
side and a time of great and blessed fellowship is
anticipated by the preachers who come from the
mountain paths of Rabun to the great city churches
of Atlanta, Augusta and Macon to recount the story
of their year’s trials and triumphs in the name of
their Master. The Baptist Convention which car
ries with it a constituency covering the whole state
is expected to call together something like a thou
sand messengers and visitors who, in the strength
ening of fellowship and the “multitude -of counsel,”
are expected to plan for greater achievements the
coming year. It is devoutly hoped that both of
these militant bodies of Christian men will take
high ground on the liquor traffic, urging our
governor-elect to recommend in his message, and
the Christian citizenship of the state to demand in
the next Democratic platform some practical and
sweeping anti-saloon legislation. Such action would
be entirely in consonance of course with the spirit
of these gatherings and certainly within the prov
ince of any body of Christian men who stand for
the building-of our Christian civilization.
Commercial Temperance.
We think of no other name to fit it—we mean
that friendship for temperance which says: “I am
opposed to the saloon—l hate the liquor traffic,
but I am opposed to an election now.”
That is the kind of argument with which the
friends of the saloon sow down every community
that contemplates a prohibition election, and there
fore it is the brand of argument that we are hearing
on all sides in Atlanta these days. And the sad part
of it is that many of the real friends of temper
ance—men of hitherto heroic mold and stalwart
stand are suffering themselves to be inoculated with
that argument. There are no nobler men living
than some of the ministers and laymen who took
the position in the recent meeting of the Anti-
Saloon League that the prohibition election which
was decided on soon after the riot in Atlanta
should be indefinitely postponed because of the
apathy of many of the leading church members in
Atlanta.
Alas, Alas’ If we must wait to pitch the battle
against saloons until these conservative, commer
cialized “prohibitionists” lead in the fight, there
will never be a prohibition battle in Atlanta be
tween now and the blasts of Gabriel’s horn.
Verily the battle must be fought and won by
the rank and file of the plain people. Valdosta
was as much under the rule and ruin of saloons
according to population as Atlanta is today, and
because four brave pastors determined that the
saloon should go and sounded the bugle note which
rallied the real friends of temperance in that fair
little city, the victory was won without one drop
of blood. True, their concerted action made an
election unnecessary. But such concert of action
on the part of Atlanta’s preachers (absolutely
uninfluenced by their wealthy, conservative mem
bers') would make the mayor and council of Atlanta
tremble in their boots, and, election or no election,
the saloons would have to go. What brave men
can .do in one community, they can do in another—
if they only mean business with their conscience
and their votes.