Bulletin (Monroe, Ga.) 1958-1962, September 20, 1958, Image 4
PAGE 4—THE BULLETIN, September 20, 1958
JOSEPH BREIG
Lady Of Our Love
other married
is that we are
I have never seen a medita
tion — although that doesn’t
mean that nobody ever wrote
one — on the fact that Mary the
Mother of God was born of the
two-in-one-flesh union of St
Joachim and
his wife St.
Anne.
No one, to
my know
ledge, has
brought forth
the deep
meanings of
this fact for
couples.
The trouble
all troubled with puritanism to
some extent. We just can’t quite
get a firm mental hold on the
truth that the body, like the
soul, is holy.
God, being incapable of im
patience, does not become an
noyed with us for this weakness,
but if He were anything less
than God, I think He would. He
has tried to make everything
plain to us.
HOW COULD HE EXPRESS
the sanctity of the flesh more
strongly than by Himself tak
ing up a human nature becom
ing incarnate, becoming a man?
And what more do we need
in the way of emphasis on the
nobility of marriage than the
fact that God formed His Mother
through the consummation of
the vows of a husband and wife?
Let us go back and see what
happened.
Here was Joachim, a Jewish
young man, and here was Anne,
a Jewish maiden. And they took
each other in wedlock, and lov
ed each other.
Did they have any intimation
that from their love would come
forth the woman promised by
God to Adam and Eve, the Vir
gin who would mother the Re
deemer who would crush the
head of Satan?
WHETHER THEY KNEW or
not, I do not know. What mat
ters to us is that God does work
His wonders through us; that
marriage is so holy that He sent
His Mother to Himself and to us
through the embrace of husband
and wife.
Since the sanctity of this state
is as exalted as that, how can we
for one moment, be deceived
about it, or tempted by the pag-
anistic modern debasement of
it?
Joachim and Anne came to
gether with faith and trust in
the Lord; and He made them
the parents of Mary, whose
birth we celebrate, whose name
we hail and to whom
this month is dedicated as
Queen of Martyrs.
ETERNALLY, Anne and
Joachim will walk together in
the glory of God, honored by
angels and saints; and why? Be
cause they put their trust in
their Creator, and humbly loved
under His overshadowing love.
We who have seen such splen
dors—what have we to do with
the cheapening of love into lust
that we see all around us, in
films and advertising; in degrad
ing books and magazines; on the
stage and in night clubs?
St. Paul put it well when he
suggested that we not so much
as let such things be mentioned
among us. For we are caught
up in Christ, we are reborn, we
are lifted to another plane al
together.
Mary our beloved, our Queen,
Mother and Sister; our proudest
boast—Mary was born of clean
love, of the fidelity of wife to
husband and husband to wife of
their faithfulness to God and
His grace.
SHE OWES her existence, and
we owe her, to the cooperation
of Joachim and Anne with God
in the act by which God has
given us power to bring forth
new immortal beings.
Joachim is her father, and she
salutes him so. Anne is her
mother, and she honors her as
mother.
Out of their love Mary arose,
and out of their solicitude for
her education in the things of
God and religion came her pre
paration for the central moment
of all history, when she brought
forth her Son and wrapped Him
in swaddling clothes and laid
Him in a manger for the rejoic
ing of all men of good will.
Such is the holiness, such is
the soaring everlasting import
ance of the good life of man
and woman in marriage.
Theology
For The
Layman
Sh
*anoe but t r o
.title.K nown
By M. J. MURRAY
Fact* for Catholic*
IW, N.C.W.C, Net* bnto
E
(By David Q. Liplak)
Q,: Is there any special obli
gation for Catholics to practice
the corporal works of mercy?
Or are they only a matter of
counsel? Is there any specific
command on the subject in the
Bible?
A.: The practice of the cor
poral works of mercy is not
elective, but mandatory upon
Christians in general. These
works, so-called because they
pertain to the corporal (Latin
corpus: “body”) or material re
quisites of men, are traditional
ly enumerated as seven:
1) to feed the hungry, 2) to
give drink to the thirsty, 3) to
clothe the naked, 4 to visit the
imprisoned, 5) to shelter the
homeless, 6) to visit the sick,
and 7) to bury the dead.
Although all these works are
mentioned many times in Scrip
ture, the first six are grouped
together in the closing verses of
St. Matthew’s twenty-fifth chap
ter (Christ’s description of the
Last Judgment. The seventh is
especially emphasized in the Old
Testament Book of Tobias.
THE SPECIFIC MANDATE
enjoining all Christians to the
performance of the corporal
works was issued by Our Divine
Lord. Its seriousness follows
from His warning that those
who refuse to fulfill it according
to their circumstances would be
liable to condemnation on the
last day:
“Then he will say to those
who are on his left hand . . .,
Go far from me, you that are ac
cursed, into that eternal fire
which has been prepared for the
(Continued on Page Five)
How Do You Rate
on Facts of Faith
Vv'VM
1
1. Who was the
(b) St. Julius?
(By Brian Cronin)
one Pope born a Jew? (a) St. Marcus?
(c) St. Peter? (d) St. Linus?
2. A person who is undergoing instruction before reception
into the Church is called a: (a) Convert? (b) Cathecist?
(c) Apologist? (d) Cathecumen?
3. Father Patrick Peyton is well-known for his Crusade on
behalf of: (a) The Legion of Decency? (b) Catholic Chari
ties? (c) The Family Rosary? (d) Catholic labor unions?
4. Martin Luther was originally a monk in which of these
orders?: (a) The Jesuits? (b) The Dominicans? (c) The
Franciscans? (d) The Augustinians?
5. Jesus during His life on earth spoke:
brew? (c) Greek? (d) Latin?
(a) Aramaic? (b) He-
6. The circular dish on which the priest holds the bread to
be consecrated is called the: (a) Purificator? (b) Pyx?
(c) Paten? (d) Pall?
7. Who said: “Indeed this was the Son of God” at the scene
of the Crucifiction?: (a) Pontius Pilate? (b) Dismas, the
thief? (c) The Roman Centurion? (d) Mary Magdelan?
8. The convert who founded the Paulist Fathers was: (a) St.
Paul? (b) Fr. Hecker? (c) Cardinal Newman? (d) John
Calvin?
Give yourself 10 marks for each correct answer below.
Rating: 80-exeellent; 70-Very Good; 60-Good; 50-Fair.
ANSWERS: 1 (c);
6 (c):
2 (d);
7 (c);
3 (c);
8 (b)
4 (d); 5 (a);
(By F. J. Sheed)
The Trinity being the supreme
mystery of our religion, this is a
good moment to clarify our no
tion of mystery: which does not
mean a truth that we cannot
know anything about, but a
truth that we
cannot know
e v e r y t hing
about.
The first
step is to see
why it must
be, and this
happily does
not call for
any vast insight. The moment
our mind has to cope with a
mind superior to itself, the pro
cesses and the products of the
superior mind must be largely
shrouded in mystery to the less
er. We cannot see how the other
mind arrives where it does, we
can comprehend only part of
what it has arrived at. Nor do
we see this as any reason for re
jecting the other’s insights. If
we are sane, we are delighted
that the world should contain
greater minds than our own: it
would be a poor prospect for the
world, if it did not: it would
be a poor world in which your
mind or mine was the best mind
existent.
Given that God exists at all,
it is clear that His ways are even
less our ways than Einstein’s or
Shakespeare’s, and that howev
er much their minds may tower
over ours, they still bear no pro
portion at all to infinite mind.
A Shakespeare wholly compre
hensible by us would be not
worth reading; a wholly com
prehensible God would be no
God, and no use. Of the ocean of
intellectual light which the
mind of God is, we can receive
but flashes and gleams, and im
measurably luminous they are
in our poor darkness. But it
would be a gross error to mis
take them for the whole ocean,
and a gross folly to wish that
they were.
In studying God — we begin
with darkness, knowing nothing,
we progress into light and revel
in it, and at last we find our
selves face to face with darkness
again, but very different dark
ness from the first, a darkness
richer than our light. It is the
experience of all who have set
themselves to a real study of
divine revelation, that as the
mind begins to take hold of the
great realities proposed to it,
they seem to be all light; and it
is only as they come to live in
the light that they are aware of
the mightier darkness, which
must be because God is infinite
and we are not. The theologian
sees far more “difficulties” in
the doctrine of the Blessed Trin
ity than the beginner, and it
would be strange if he did not.
Nor does he repine at this, but
rejoices. It was one of the great
est of theologians who created
the phrase caligo quaedam lux
— the darkness is a kind of
light. It is a kind of light in two
ways, a lesser and a greater; the
lesser because it involves seeing
why the mind can see no fur
ther, it is not merely baffled by
mystery, but to that extent en
lightened by it; the greater be
cause of the very richness of the
felt darkness — if the light that
they can see be such, what must
the darkness be which is light '
too bright for human eyes.
Mystery presents itself to us
not only as something we cannot
see because the light is too
strong for our eyes; but also,
and sometimes worryingly, as
the appearance of contradiction
in the things we do see.
As we come to grasp what
God has taught us through His
Church, we find certain ele
ments at which our intellects
cry a challenge, certain others
which stir our feelings to some
thing very much like revolt. We
find the notion of eternal suf
fering so painful that we cannot
reconcile it with a loving God;
or we find the doctrine of hu
man freedom impossible to rec
oncile with God’s omniscience.
The answer, of course, is that
all these elements are reconcil
ed in the whole, and we do not
see the whole. But we know that
God is not only all-wise, but all
good. What He does and what
He reveals is supreme truth and
supreme love. In that confidence
we can ask God for light to see
how it is truth or love; but our
trust is not diminished by one
iota if our prayer for that extra
gleam of light is not granted.
The smiting qravedigget
PLAGUE MEMORIAL at
MITTEL-LLWGENOLS,
SlLEElR, is O. curious Way .
Of Commemorating tfus
BLACK t>EATH urfuck :
rat/agcd. Europe in. ike
Middle Ages. ^
sF”
‘dne lieaSureS of
AACHEN CATHEDRAL]
GERMANY;
include:
the cloak: OF
OUR, LADY;
SWADDLING CLOTHES Zr
A LOIN'CLOTH OF
OUR LORD;
AND THE CLOTH ON WHICH
THE SEVERED HEAD
SAINT JOHN"
THE BAPTIST.
iWAS PLACED.
Alcohol—An Instrument Of The DeviI?
THE BACKDROP
'f:-7t[is is a. /6ik
CENTURY GERMAN
CRUCIFIX CLOCK.
C7Ae eagles beak
points zb ike time.
IT IS IN THE ILBERT
COLLECTION, LONDON
«Ti,i
SUS/NEi J CENTER, a
SHARING OUR TREASURE
Explains Faith To Sweetheart
—Wins Convert
By REV. JOHN A, O'BRIEN. Ph. D.
(University of Notre Dame) „
Mrs. Clarence L. Struckman,
232 10th Ave S.W., Oelwein,
Iowa, believes that the greatest
gift which a Catholic can help
to secure for non-Catholic
friends is membership in the
Mystical Body of Jesus Christ.
Such membership comes
through baptism, which makes
one a child of God and an heir
to heaven. That Mrs. Struck
man has puti
belief into I
practice is ev
ident from the I
fact that she
has led three
non- Catholics
to the baptis- '
mal font and
reclaimed a
fallen-away.
“When Clarence and I were
keeping company,” related Mrs.
Struckman, “I realized how
much it would mean to the hap
piness of both of us if we could
worship together and receive
the sacraments together. My
greatest treasure is the, holy
Catholic faith. How ardently I
longed to share that treasure,
the greatest source of my hap
piness, with the man I loved.
“I decided that we shouldn’t
talk merely about moonlight
and roses and the other frivo
lous topics which engage the at
tention of lovers, but should al
so talk about religion. I explain- .
ed to Clarence how much my
religion means to me, how it is
an integral part of my very life.
“I told him that mixed mar
riages are far from the ideal,
since they lack the powerful re
enforcement of a common faith
and practice. I asked him to look
into our religion and especially
to examine the evidence of its
divine origin and of its authority
to speak and teach in the name
of its divine Founder.
“Clarence’s father had been
reared a Lutheran and his mo
ther a Methodist, but their five
sons and five daughters were
reared in no faith. It illustrates
perfectly the point that mixed
marriages often lead to the loss
of faith on the part of the chil
dren and even of the parents.
Clarence listened attentively but
said nothing. I gave him a cate
chism and another book ex
plaining the Faith.
“One evening while we Were
out for a ride, Clarence turned
to me and said, ‘Look what I’ve
learned to do.’ He then made the
sign of the cross on himself. He
had been driving seven miles
each week to take instructions
from Father Collins at Waverly,
the priest nearest his home, lat
er he got work at Oelwein, fin
ished his instructions with Fa
ther O’Connor here, and we
were married with a Nuptial
Mass at Sacred Heart Church in
June.
“Our common faith has in
creased our happiness and has
enabled us to rear our three
children as devout Catholics and
set the proper example for them.
That’s what counts.
“Perhaps I should have men
tioned that my first convert was
my father, David Howard. I
used to ask him to hear me re
cite my catechism lesson and
my prayers. That got him inter
ested, and mother and I took
him to a Mission and to Sunday
Mass. One day he said to us,
‘I’ve got a surprise for you. I’m
going to be baptized tomorrow
morning.’
“We have an excellent dio
cesan newspaper, The Witness,
and after reading it I would pass
it on to a non-Catholic neigh
bor, Nellie Dempsey. That got
her interested in the Catholic
religion and she asked me many
questions. Then I arranged for
her instruction at Sacred Heart
rectory and served as godmother
at her baptism.
“That brought her husband
Frank, who had been out of the
Church for 25 years, back to the
sacraments. My little experience
shows that we of the laity can
do much in sharing the Faith if
we only make the effort. God
will give the needed grace if we
do our part.
Prohibition lobbies were more
active than usual in the recent
session of Congress, but they
failed to achieve any of their
goals.
A case can be made out that
alcoholism is becoming a serious
problem not -
only in the
United States
but in Canada
a n d in many
Eu ro pean
countries. But
the profes
sional dries,
having learn
ed nothing, apparently, since the
repeal of the 18th Amendment,
are not content to state a case.
As always they insist on over
stating it, thus weakening the
force of arguments that other
wise would merit consideration.
For the most part, the pro
fessional dries are not interested
in temperance. They look upon
alcohol as an instrument of the
Devil and demand nothing less
than prohibition of its use by
statute. Although their experi
ence with prohibition should
have taught them that people
cannot be made to change their
habits by repressive legislation,
the statutory banning of drinks
is still their aim.
“Our children are getting al
coholism education rather than
alcohol education,” said a
spokesman of the Women’s
Christian Temperance Union at
a recent convention of the dries.
“Alcoholism education cannot
contribute to the health and hap
piness of the child, nor to an at
tainable solution of the alcohol
By JOHN C. O’BRIEN
problem.”
ALCOHOLIC HAZE?
A yet more fanatical advocate
of total abstinence, speaking at
the same meeting, called for the
banning of liquor at all interna
tional conferences, including
presumably the United Nations.
“National leaders must enter
conferences with a clear head,”
said the speaker. “They must
not permit themselves to be
drugged or befuddled by alco
holic beverages.
“Living in a Sputnik age, as
we are, important decisions
must be made suddenly and the
statesman under the influence
of alcohol will ‘miss the bus’ if
his mind is deranged by even a
slight amount of alcohol.”
Whether or not the speaker so
intended it, his suggestion
leaves the clear influence that
the heads of governments of the
western world and their foreign
ministers conduct international
conferences in an alcoholic haze.
On its face the suggestion is
preposterous. None of the states
men who have participated in
international conferences before
or after the end of the Second
World War have been fond of
the bottle, except Former Prime
Minister Winston Churchill,
whose liking for brandy has
been widely publicized, and
vodka-guzzling Nikita Khru
shchev. But no one who has
dealt with these men at the con
ference table would dare to say
that either one ever “missed the
bus” because of a derangement
of mind due to alcohol.
ANCIENT CUSTOM
As though the absurdity of
suggesting that international
conferences are conducted in the
atmosphere of the cocktail par
ty was not enough, the same
champion of abstinence .volun
teered the astounding informa
tion that “drinking is really a
carryover from the .Middle
Ages.” As if he never had read
the injunctions against overin-
dulgence in wine in the Old and
New Testaments or the orgies of
the Bachanals in Rome.
Although the use of alcoholic
beverages is as old as the re
corded history of man, he would
have us believe that drinking
was an invention of the Middle
Ages — that time in history
which is made the whipping
boy for so many things that dis
please the modern mind.
It was, in a measure, because
the demands of the professional
dries were so extreme and their
arguments so overlaid with
sheer nonsense that they failed
to make an impression on the
lawmakers.
Many Congressmen are deep
ly concerned over the mounting
evil of alcoholism. They would
like to curb excessive use of al
cohol, which is responsible for
so much misery and so many
deaths on the highways. They
appropriate $700,000 for alcohol
ism research. But they turned a
deaf ear to the proposal of the
dries that no funds be provided
the State Department for enter
tainment, for fear that an
American statesman might go
into an international conference
so befuddled by liquor that he
would “miss the bus.”
Plan OFM Midwest Centennial
Pictured during his visit to Home, Father Pius Barth,
O.F.M. (right), Minister Provincial of the Franciscans’ St.
Louis-Chicago province is shown with the Order’s Minister
General, Father Augustine Sepinski, O.F.M. The centennial
observance of the coming of the brown-robed Franciscans
to the Middle West, has just been opened at the novitiate
in Teutopolis, 111., first foundation in the midwest. Other
celebrations will be held throughout the next two months.
(NC Photos)
Church
Nature
In Shrine's
(N.CW.C. News Service)
LOURDES, France — The 28-
year-old cure of a tuberculosis-
stricken pilgrim to Lourdes has
officially been recognized as
miraculous by the Church and
entered as such in the archives
of the medical bureau here.
The case, which became the
55th cure proclaimed as miracu
lous by ecclesiastical authorities
in the shrines’ 100 years of ex
istence, dates back to October
10, 1930.
Lydie Brosse was a 41-year-
old bedridden pilgrim who suf
fered from intestinal tuberculo
sis and tuberculosis of the bone.
She made a pilgrimake to
Lourdes from her home in St.
Raphael on the southeast coast
of France.
Doctors judged her condition
desperate. Owing to her state of
weakness, nurses at the shrine
decided against the customary
immersion in Lourdes water.
They merely applied compres
ses soaked in the water to the
sores that covered her body.
On the train on her way home
Miss Brosse’s condition improv
ed with dramatic rapidity. She
sat up on the stretcher for the
first time in 18 months. Her
sores healed, leaving only small
scars, as she started walking
around the train carriage.
In St. Raphael the patient as
tounded nurses who had comfl
to meet her by jumping off th@
train and walking with com
plete ease around the platform.
The doctor who treated Miss
Brosse examined her immedi
ately and found her recovered
from her illness. The following
year she returned to Lourdes
where the doctors of the medical
bureau again declared she was
in perfectly good health.
In 1955, on the occasion of the
25th anniversary of her cure,
Miss Brosse made a pilgrimage
of thanksgiving to Lourdes,
where she presented herself once
more before the medical bureau.
Thirteen doctors then declared
her cure to be medically inex-
plainable.
According to the usual pro
cedure, the case was submitted
to the International Medical
Commission of Lourdes. The
commission confirmed the con
clusions of the medical bureau
and declared that there were
sound reasons for turning the
case over to the authority of the
Church, who alone could qualify
the cure as miraculous.
A canonical commission was
established in the Diocese of
Coutances, in northern France,
where Miss Brosse now lives.
The commission examined the
case and declared that her cure
Recognizes
Of Lourdes
Miraculous
Cure: 55th
100 Year Existence
presented all the characteristics
of a true miracle.
A report issued in recent
weeks by the ecclesiastical com
mission stated that:
— nothing either in the man
ner or in the circumstances
showed the least impropriety
that might cast any doubt as to
the divine character of the cure.
— the cure was obtained
through prayers during a pil
grimage to Lourdes.
— the primary aim of the mir
acle, which is the glory of God,
had been attained in the highest
degree.
— secondary aims had like
wise been assured: proof of the
holiness of the Blessed Virgin
Mary and of the power of her
intercession in particular.
— other supernatural effects
can legitimately be supposed:
strengthening of the faith of the
witnesses and an increase in
their devotion.
While thousands of “cures”
are recorded in the archives of
the medical bureau of Lourdes
as scientifically unexplainable
only 55, including Miss Brosse’s,
have so far been recognized as
miraculous by the Church.
Services For
Mrs. Goepper
ATLANTA, Ga. — Funeral
services for Mrs. Dan (Manie)
Goepper were held August 26th
ai the Cathedral of Christ the
King, Msgr. Joseph Cassidy
officiating.
Survivors are her husband;
four daughters, Mrs. Joseph D.
Thompson of Atlanta; Mrs.
Dewey F. Cheeks of Atlanta;
Mrs. Robert T. Blackwell of
Phil., Pa. and Mrs. Joseph W.
Hale of Birmingham, Ala.; two
sisters, Mrs. F. H. Jarrell of
Little Rock, Ark., and Mrs. L. J.
Martin of Chicago, 111.; 14
grandchildren and one great
grandchild.
DECATUR SERVICES
FOR J. J. JOYCE
DECATUR, Ga. — Funeral
services for Mrs. James J. Joyce
were held Sept. 4th at St.
Thomas More Church, Rev. T. J.
Roshetko, S. M. officiating.
M rs. Ted Minahan
Services Held
ATLANTA, Ga. — Funeral
services for Mrs. Ted (Meta
Shinholser) Minahan were held
August 22nd at the Sacred Heart
Church, Rev. Matthew Faschan
officiating.
Survivors are Mother M.
Canisius, C. S. C., St. Mary’s
Notre Dame, Ind.; Mr. and Mrs.
Robert M. Margeson, Mr. and
Mrs. Andrew Bindewald, Green
ville, S. C., and Mr. and Mrs.
H. A. Kane, grandchildren and
great-grandchildren.
luiirtut
416 8TH ST., AUGUSTA, GA.
Published fortnightly by the Catholic Laymen’s Association of
Georgia, Inc., with the Approbation of the Most Reverend Arch
bishop-Bishop of Savannah, The Most Reverend Bishop of Atlanta
and the Right Reverend Abbot Ordinary of Belmont. Subscription
price $3.00 per year.
Second class mail privileges authorized at Monroe, Georgia. Send
notice of change of address to P. O. Box 320, Monroe, Georgia.
REV. FRANCIS J. DONOHUE REV. R. DONALD K1ERNAN
Editor Savannah Edition Editor Atlanta Edition
JOHN MARKWALTER
Managing Editor
Vol. 39 Saturday, September 20, 1958 No. 8
ASSOCIATION OFFICERS FOR 1957-1958
GEORGE G1NGELL, Columbus President
E. M. HEAGARTY, Waycross Honorary Vice-President
MRS. DAN HARRIS, Macon . Vice-President
TOM GRIFIIN, Atlanta Vice-President
NICK CAMERIO, Macon Secretary
JOHN T. BUCKLEY, Augusta Treasurer
ALVIN M. McAULIFFE, Augusta Auditor
JOHN MARKWALTER, Augusta Executive Secretary
MISS CECILE FERRY, Augusta Financial Secretary