The bulletin (Augusta, Ga.) 1920-1957, April 01, 1920, Image 3
THE BULLETIN OF THE CATHOLIC LAYMEN’S ASSOCIATION OF GEORGIA
3
It was Peter who told the rest of the Apostles that
it was necessary to select a successor to the traitor,
Judas. And he quoted the prophecy of David in ref
erence to the choice.
“When the Apostles, filled with the Holy Spirit,
came down from the Cenacle, it was Peter who first
spoke to the multitude the name and Messiaship of
Jesus, and as a result of his preaching we are told
that three thousand persons were converted.
Peter and John went up to the Temple to pray, and
at the door of the Temple which was called the Beau
tiful Gate, there sat a lame beggar looking at them
for alms and stretching out his hands. Peter an
swered him: “Silver and gold I have none, but what
I have I give unto thee. In the name of Jesus Christ
of Nazareth rise and walk.” And the lame man was
instantly cured.
Ananias and his wife Saphira fell dead at the feet
of Peter because they lied about the price they had
received from the sale of lands.
Wherever Peter went they brought their sick so
that at least his shadow might fall upon them, and
those on whom his shadow fell were healed. (Acts V.)
St. Paul tells us that after his conversion to Chris
tianity, he went up to Jerusalem to see Peter and
spent a fortnight with him. (Galatians I.)
In the second chapter of the same epistle St. Paul
says that God gave to Peter the Apostolate to the Jew
ish people.
In the ninth chapter of the Acts of the Apostles
we are told that Peter while at Joppa raised to life
Tabitha. And at the same place God vouchsafed a
wonderful vision to him by which he was taught that
God is no respecter of races or persons and gives His
grace to all.
In the twelfth chapter of the Acts we are told that
Herod, after killing James, cast Peter into prison;
and “prayer was made without ceasing by the Church
unto God for him.” And God sent an Angel to the
prison who released Peter and set him free.
y When a dispute arose among some with regard to
circumcision Paul and Barnabas came to Jerusalem
to have it definitely settled. And Peter rose in the
assembly and at his word the dispute was settled.
(Acts XV.)
And now let us see what is the obvious meaning of
all these quotations from the inspired Word of God.
Remember the point which I set out to prove was:
On Peter were conferred by God certain privileges
and honors, which were not given to the others. Thus
proving a certain primacy or pre-eminence was his.
I will take up these texts in the order I have ob
served in quoting them:
I. Every time that a list of the Apostles is given
by the Evangelists the name of Peter is always men
tioned first. These men wrote under the inspiration
of the Floly Spirit. It is foolish to say that this order
in naming the Apostles is merely a coincidence and
means nothing. There are no such things as acci
dental and chance phrases in the Word of God.
Peter’s name is mentioned first because there was a
recognition of his superiority.
II. Why did our Lord at first sight of Simon tell
him that his name should be called Peter, which
means a rock? Possibly we will get an idea if we
look at what the Evangelist tells us when recording
the words of Christ of the wise and prudent man who
built his house not on the shifting sands, but estab
lished it on the rock; so that neither winds nor sea
could destroy it. (Luke VI.-48.) When we are told
of the crowd pressing on the Master as He stood on
the seashore, it is said there were two boats there,
but the Lord taught the multitude from Peter’s boat.
Was this merely a coincidence? Or was it not be
cause Christ intended that from His leaving the world
until the end of time men would always hear His
voice from Peter s boat? If, as we will see further on,
Christ made Peter the foundation and the Teacher of
His Church, His meaning here is very clear. Why
was Peter told to launch out yet farther and let down
his net? Why did the miraculous draught of fishes
come? Why did Christ tell him that he would hence
forth “catch men”?
The answer is plain. Christ was to make Peter
the teacher of all. All men were to be gathered in
his net, for he was to draw them all to Christ.
III. It is well to notice here that Peter, as usual,
spoke for all the Apostles, though he was not par
ticularly addressed by the Master; but. here as else
where he answered for all.
Christ speaks of His Church, which He was to
build. What He thought of that Church may be seen
in St. Paul’s Epistle to the Ephesians: “Christ loved
the Church and delivered Himself up for it; that He
might sanctify it, by the laver of water in the word
of life; that He might present it to Himself a glorious
Church not having a spot or wrinkle or any such
thing, but that it should be holy and without blem
ish.” (Ephes. V.)
Of this Church which Christ so loved and for which
He died, He made Peter the foundation. And He
gave him the keys of the Kingdom of Heaven. It is
well known that to “give up the keys” was the symbol
of surrender of authority. He promised that what
ever Peter bound on earth should be bound in Heaven
and what he loosed on earth should be loosed in
Heaven. Is there any sane and unprejudiced man
who can fail to admit that here is a very plain con
ferring on Peter by Christ of wonderful powers and
privileges? It is to be noticed here that when Peter
made this confession of faith in the Divinity of Christ,
our Lord expressly stated that the revelation of Flis
Divinity had been made to Peter by God Himself,
which seems to me a special mark of favor and a
very distinguished favor to Peter.
IV. At the raising to life of the daughter of
Jairus, Jesus permitted only three of His disciples to
accompany Him, and as usual the Holy Spirit in nam
ing them says: Peter and James and John. Does
anyone suppose this was done by chance? When the
Jews found—as our Protestant friends yet do our