Newspaper Page Text
The So uthern Israelite
Page 5
• NEW YORK TOPICS 9 •
Thirty thousand garment workers,
11s11 v Jews, are on strike since July
The Manhattan district from 23rd
t!eet to 40th Street, called the gar-
,nt center, is the scene of daily un-
, st _ Nothing fundamentally danger-
tn be sure. Those who have wit-
. ss ,.d revolutionary labor struggles
other centers, with their direct
m . a t to society as now constituted,
•ill he inclined to view these events
s a rather mild occurrence. The fights
cvelop, not between the state and
ahor as a class, but between organ-
,,.,| labor as a social force, construc-
vc and state building in the final
na lysis, as against the anti-social
.ores of the sweat shops on one side
nd the left wingers on the other.
The sweat shop was the enemy that
tood at the cradle of the Jewish labor
no vi olent a generation ago. The in-
hvidualism and the innate sense of
ustice of the Jewish worker waged
t tierce battle against it. Due to the
•nergy and intellect invested in the
inht against this social plague, it was
>y and by recognized that the aboli-
ion of the sweat shop is not only in
lie interest of labor but perhaps more
u tlic benefit of the state, of the indus
try as such, and of business in gen
eral. Under the influence of these la
b"r struggles, social legislation was
placed on the statute books of the
State of New York which stands out
as a shining example of a fair and
humanitarian approach toward a so
lution of the problems under modern
conditions.
As a result of the unfortunate 1926
tnke under the left wing leadership,
tin ladies’ garment workers, who were
m the forefront of progress, seem
acain to be threatened with the sweat
>h"p menace. The war declared
must it is significant in more than
« a- direction. It certainly has the sym-
I'itthy of the enlightened New York
public, who think in social, rather
than m narrow class terms.
appointment by Governor
r l ‘velt of our Lieutenant-Governor,
nel Herbert H. Lehman, who was
tman of Governor Smith’s board
' the 1924 strike, augurs well
speedy and just settlement. It
a particular meaning from a Jew-
h point of view when it is remem-
ared that the welfare of almost 30,-
1 Jewish families directly affected
I about as many indirectly inter-
l^tcd, is at stake.
I A house cleaning in the New York
die industry has even greater im-
po'tance from a Jewish political point
r tw \ ^he outstanding feature in
Jewish mass immigration to the
; States during the beginning
< ne twentieth century was the com-
' l y, rapid transformation of a
l.n ", oumber of our people from the
menschen” class into a health>
Productive factor in the economic
a 0ric of American life.
‘te, alarming signs of an in
I he Garment W orkers Strike Draws Attention to a Weighty
Problem—The Sweat Shop Is Here Again—The Ameri
can Communists Have a Trotsky of Their Own—
Light on the Good-will Movement —And
\\ hat INext i—Dr. Boris I). Bogen
Passes Away
emphasis of difference, is a mistake,
particularly when there may be
ground for an assumption that the
good-will movement is parallelled by
proselytizing attempts.
Dr. Boris D. Bogen passed away.
By WILLIAM Z.
creasing exodus of many workers and
their children into the ranks of the
lower middle classes were beginning
to be noted. This fact not only tended
to undo the work of the first genera
tion of pioneers, but also to raise
many weighty economic and social
questions.
The elimination of the sweat shop
evil and the raising of the standard
in the needle industry may be a step
in a direction perhaps beyond the pro
gram of the International Ladies Gar
ment Workers’ union and the Ameri
can Federation of Labor which lends
to it its support.
Jay Lovestone, formerly the “Amer
ican Stalin” in the Communist party
in the United States, small and insig
nificant as it may be, has now been
turned into the “American Trotsky.”
He has been expelled from the party
at the order of Moscow. He is said
to be a brilliant man, a former stu
dent at the College of the City of New
York.
It is difficult to follow the Commu
nist phraseology and to know definite
ly what led up to the development but
one thing is clear, Lovestone disobey
ed the Moscow dictatorship and has
its heartiest disapproval.
In this regard he must be right.
Considerable time has elapsed since
the question of the good-will move
ment, as sponsored in recent years by
the official religious organizations,
has been reopened with the publica
tion of the astounding and no less in
structive correspondence between
Louis Marshall and the Rev. Alfred
Williams Anthony.
The question of whether good-will
is consistent with Christian missionary
propoganda among Jews has been
squarely raised. The representative of
the Good-Will Committee of the Fed
eral Council of Churches of Christ in
CANDY STORE OWNERS, LARGE
PERCENTAGE JEWISH, FACE CRI
SIS IN CIGARETTE WAR
New York (J. T. A.)—The war now
raging between the large cigar store
companies and the chain grocery stores
over the cut in the price of cigarettes
has caught in its vise the small sta
tionery and candy store keepers
throughout the country, eighty per
cent of whom are Jewish.
The 400,000 small stores and stands
throughout the country and the 40,000
of this number in New York City are
facing a crisis due to this rivalry, es
pecially between the United Cigar
Stores and the Great Atlantic and
Pacific Tea Company. The small store
keepers find their difficulty in meeting
the slashed prices on cigarettes offer
ed by the A. & P. and the counter
reduction of the cigar company, bring
ing the price down to the wholesale
cost to the small dealer.
SPIEGELMAN
America, though he was not speaking
in behalf of the Committee, as it was
later explained, decidedly insisted on
the continuation of missionary propa
ganda among Jews. He not. only saw
no inconsistency, but, to the contrary,
emphasized the obligation resting on
every professor of Christianity to
propagate the gospel among the non
believers and the Children of Israel
in particular.
It is a sad comment on the depth
of interest taken in the question when
one observes that this exchange of
opinions has stirred no one to attempt
to clarify the situation. Neither the
Federal Council nor the Central Con
ference of American Rabbis have, of
ficially or otherwise, seen fit to en
lighten the public on the course of
future action. The July weather may
have something to do with this apa
thetic stand, but it does not explain
the matter entirely. The Central Con
ference of American Rabbis happened
to be in session in Detroit several days
after the correspondence came to
light, but its action on the subject was
limited to a platonic statement that
“other arrangements” will be sought
in co-operation with the Federal Coun
cil for furthering the good-will move
ment. This is more than surprising.
Let there be no mistake about it.
The Jews have never rejected any
move to increase and to spread
“peace on earth and good-will toward
men.” Their very existence for cen
turies depended on peace on earth.
Their attitude toward non-Jews was
ever that of good-will. If a movement
for good-will is to be inaugurated, it
is more incumbent upon those whose
lack of good-will creates danger to
those who do not share the beliefs,
views or opinions of the majority. It
seems, however, that to intrust the
furtherance of good-will by special
measures to religious organizations
whose very foundation rests on an
FOURTEEN JEWS ELECTED TO
COMMONS
London (J. T. A.)—Fourteen Jews
were elected to the House of Com
mons in the elections which have just
taken place in England. The Liberal
Party gained three prominent Jews in
Parliament in the persons of Sir Her
bert Samuel, James Rothschild and
Major H. L. Nathan. All previous Jew
ish members of Parliament were re
elected with the exception of E. A.
Straus, Liberal, and Samuel Fin-
bourgh, Conservative, who did not
seek re-election.
The Labor Party gained a Jewish
member, Dr. G. Spero. Three Jews
now represent the Labor Party in Par
liament. There were twenty five can
didates for election on the Labor
Ticket who failed to gain seats, among
them Leonard Stein and Philip Guo-
dalla.
His death will be mourned and re
gretted in many Jewish circles in the
United States and in Europe. It was
he to whom the task of administering
the American Jewish relief fund dis
tribution in Europe during the most
critical moments of the world war and
following it was intrusted. His admin
istration under conditions constantly
changing and under regimes newly in
augurated, amidst conflcts of the local
Jewish groups, parties and interests
which cannot properly be understood
and appreciated by an American ob
server unless especially trained and
dedicated to the task, was not entire
ly free of criticism at the time. It was
to be expected under all conditions
when large groups are administered
to. Complete impartiality under such
circumstances ami fairness to all, Or
thodox and assimilationists, Zionists
and Folkists, Yiddishits and Hebraists,
Socialists and.Communists would have
been beyond human reach. His was the
responsibility and his was the great
privilege to be at helm of the great
est piece of humanitarian work per
formed by American Jewry in behalf
of a large section of our people in
Eastern Europe.
When it is assumed that American
Jewish relief work on behalf of East
European Jews was inaugurated only
during the World War, an error of
historic interpretation is committed.
In reality, the relief work for East
European Jews was started as early
as 1881 when the first wave of Rus
sian Jewish refugees reached these
shores. It was for their sake and, be
cause of the social problem their
presence created for the earlier Jew
ish settlers, that the entire apparatus
of Jewish welfare work in the United
States was developed and extended,
through the Federations system and
their constituent societies, becoming,
in time, one of the major Jewish con
tributions to American life.
When the world war broke out and
the need of East European Jewry,
locked between the war fronts, be
came crying, the relief work was
transferred on a large scale to Eu
rope itself. The work for East Euro
pean immigrants in the United States
was extended to those who had re
mained at home and became the vic
tims of the war and the social upheav
als which followed in its wake.
An outstanding social worker, with
a Russian background, thoroughly
Americanized, a Columbia Ph.D., the
most successful in his profession, Dr.
Bogen was the logical choice for the
tremendous responsibility. His was the
understanding of the American giver’s
psychology as well as that of the East
European Jew who, because of the
world events, was transformed over
night into a recipient of organized
charity. He understood them both and
acted as a bridge between them.
—Copyright 1929 by the Jewish
Telegraphic Agency, Inc.