The Southern Israelite. (Augusta, Ga.) 1925-1986, September 19, 1930, Image 12
1
Page 12
The Southern Israelite
By DR. JOSEPH RAUCH
Louisville, Ky.
“Reform Judaism lias for a long time
treated Religious Education exactly like
Reform Temples treated the Sunday
School,” I)r. Joseph Rauch said in a recent
address on “The Religious School of the
Rabbi" before the group attending the
Graduate Rabbinical School at the Hebrew
0
Union College in Cincinnati.
“The founders of the Reform Movement,”
said Dr. Rauch, “were concerned with rit
ual, theology and emancipation. Their
philosophy and endeavors centered about
the position of the adult Jew. Children
played a very minor role in their thinking
and striving.
“Reform congregations followed suit and
showed great concern in the kind of Tem
ples they built, the kind of rabbi they en
gaged, the kind of choir they selected, but
not in the kind of religious education that
would be imparted.
“This indifference to and neglect of the
Sunday Schools went on for nearly a cen
tury. The gorgeous and expensive temples
that Reform Congregations built from the
period 1850 to 1000 gave scant attention
to the school facilities. The basement was
good enough.
“Teachers in the sense of trained peda
gogues were non-existent in most commu
nities. Anyone who was willing to teach
or could be induced to teach was accepted.
'The rabbi himself was not trained ade
quately in those days for the kind of reli
gious education the Sunday School needed.
“Then, too, there was no literature to
convey religious school information. The
books, pamphlets, leaflets and cards which
we then put into the hands of our children
neither expressed what we wanted to teach
httnor what the children needed. There were
■ no two religious schools alike throughout
the country. The uniformity of Reform
Temples in religious education was to be
found in the anarchy of method.
"We should bear in mind that this whole
business of Sunday School is a new institu
tion in our midst. The Cheder and Yeshi-
vah have existed for a long time, but their
aim was to give the student a knowledge of
Hebrew and an acquaintance with the vast
mass of Jewish literature. Neither intend
ed to teach Jewish people, young or old.
how to be Jewish and how to live a Jewish
life. These were taken for granted.
“This was our educational heritage when
the Sunday School came into existence.
Obviously it did not fit into the new Jewish
religious life which Reform from within
Dr. Joseph Lunch
l
and occidental life from without were
creating for our congregations.
“Rut we knew no other system, so we
followed our traditions in practically ignor
ing the teaching of Judaism as a religion.
We took a knowledge of it for granted,
though we were no longer warranted in so
doing. We began our instruction with the
creation story and added to it instruction in
Hebr ew. It was history plus Hebrew that
constituted the course of instruction in the
early Reform Sunday Schools just as it
was history in and through Hebrew that
made up the curriculum of the Cheder.”
Dt*. Rauch pointed out in his discussion
that a half century passed before the rabbis
realized how inadequate was the system of
Jewish education for their needs. It took
them a long time to discover that what
could once have been safely taken for
granted now had to be taught, and that the
children of today live in an environment
that is foreign to Judaism.
Our Jewish religious education problem
is unique,” said Dr. Rauch. “It has not
only to impart information as has any other
system of education but has also to create
an atmosphere and religious sympathy
formerly supplied by the Jewish home and
the Jewish environment.
"Orthodox, Conservative and Reform
groups are today studying the whole field
of religious education with great earnest
ness. Retter text books are being pro
duced. The importance of Jewish :
education is being recognized and
the larger congregations are en
educational directors to supervise tin- work
of the religious schools. The smaller com
munities cannot of course, afford this, but
even there, the Sunday School is n<» longer
the Cinderella of the congregational house
hold.
“Our weakness lies in our inability to
give our children that Jewish background
which, in a former age, the home supplied.
For we must admit that the Jewish homes
are highly impoverished in Jewishness.
Their tone, the books and periodicals which
come to them, the conversations, the edu
cational ideals voiced in them are not of
a kind that create and stimulate interest
in things Jewish. The efforts of the rabbis
to improve this have so far produced no
encouraging results. What are we to do?
“I should say that our first duty, as rab
bis, is to enlighten our congregations on the
problems of Jewish education. We can also
urge our temple societies, especially our
Sisterhoods, to aid us in cultivating a Jew
ish attitude in our congregations. At our
teachers’ meetings we can discuss these
problems and devise some means of coping
with them.
“The rabbi must stress more than ever
before the religious motif in all the fact'
that are taught in the religious schools
The assembly period should be largely de
voted to voice worship, prayer, hope, faith.
It may be put to such use as will bring out
some of the religious influences that we ex
pect from the home and the temple.
“We have been allotted too short a period
for religious school work. Iheie i>
movement throughout the country to m
crease it. I believe that before very Dug
we shall have at least an additional lion
a week in many congregations for u-hgiou
work.
“The encouraging part of the whole dit
ficult and vexing problem is that we undtr
stand it much better today than v <. did
generation ago. And not only do " l nndt
stand it better but we are grappling
it. We are not afraid to speak
short-comings or even our failuo
all sides earnest efforts are being
create ways and means to enabh
day' School to become a religion-
ual bulwark to Jewish life. W e
in due time it will become a ' '
religious strength for our child'