The Christian index. (Atlanta, Ga.) 1892-current, February 02, 1893, Image 2
ISW KINGDOM IS NOT OF THIS
■ft WORLD.” JOHN 18:36.
RKof. Rutherford quotes these
jWIB of the Lord as a text in sup-
S W't an artic '° written by Bro
9. J. Webb in the Index of Decem-
BerSth, |1892, under the caption of
[“Wrong and Dangerous.” That
[correspondent offered a criticism of
the action of an association in pass
ing a resolution to memorialize the
Legislature, then in session, “to de
feat the effort to give incorporated
cities and towns control of tho liquor
question in their bounds, independ
ent of the counties in which they are
situated.”
This is the “dangerous wrong’’
which Bro. Webb criticises. This is
in my judgment, neither a “wrong’’
nor “dangerous,” and for reasons
offered in a subsequent issue of the
Index, which Prof. Rutherford
chanced to see, which he says ho
read carefully, in the Index of
January 19th, 1883. He says he is
sure I do not understand the point
made by Bro. "Webb. Prof. R.
may be right. He says the examples)
quoted from Armitage’s History, do
not apply to Bro. Webb’s criticism.
Let us see. Bro. Webb said “a town
council, a grand jury or a political
convention may invoke the State to
enact certain measures. But a church,
I repeat, is no part of the govern
ment, is not amenable to that govern
ment, nor the government to it,” and
his logic is, that a church and an as
sociation cannot memorialize the
legislature, touching the liquor ques
tion. I understood—and to my sat
isfaction did show—that Baptists
have in the past memorialized con
stitutional conventions, congresses
and legislatures, and I will not hero
quote further authorities as to the
abstract tight of “memorializing.” If
I remember correctly, those authori
ties memorialized, not only against,
but for certain legislation, and that
there is nothing in Prof. R’s sugges
tion, that “Baptists in all ages have
held that no human authority had
the right to dictate to any man, what
form of religion ho should support.
To enter a solemn protest against
government requiring Baptists to pay
tribute to a state religion, is perfect
ly consistent with their doctrine of
entire separation between church and
state.” AV hat does Prof. 11. mean
by this declaration, so well worded
and plainly stated. Certainly, that
for government to establish a state
religion or to compel any man to pay
tribute to a state religion would be a
great political and social wrong, and
1 agree with him in this conclusion)
and because it is wrong, therefore it
is right to memorialize touching such
a wrong. Now let us extend his
logic, upon this line of ratiocination
I assert that the whiskey trnfic is the
monster evil of this day and nation.
It is evil, only evil and that continu
ally. It is the prolific mother of in
dividual, political and social disasters.
Is it a withering, blasting curse to
body and soul, for time and eternity.
It is “wrong and dangerous” for a
church and association, in the con
templation of this dreaded evil, to
protest against unwise legislation,
touching this subject. ?
Are we to understand Prof. R. and
his student to say, your churches and
associations may “memorialize” the
law-making powers of government
against unwise legislation upon the
subject of a state religion, but upon
no other subject. This is certainly
the trend of their criticisms. I can
not see why a resolution of a church
or an association, memorializing the
law-making powers of government
against uuwiso legislation touching
whiskey, tends to the consolidation
of church and state, any more than
memorializing these powers touch
ing a state religion. Our associations
have committies appointed to report
on intemperance—when made, a
discussion follows in unmistakable
and unmeasured terms of condemna
tion.
Prof. R. says I know Bro. Webb,
well, having taught him.” Suppose
Prof. R. does know him well, what
has that to do with the subject under
review? Nothing so far as I can
discover, unless it is an assurance
that Bro. Webb, having studied
mathematics under so able a man,
could not go astray in theology.
Did Prof. R. rightly understand
his own student? Speaking of the
action of the association, Prof. 11.
■ays, “that body, as a Christian body*
proposed to petition the Legislature
to pass a law to suppress what is
considered an evil.” The Student
really said, “the association passed a
resolution to memorialize the Legis
lature to defeat the effort to give in
corporated cities and towns control
of the liquor question in their
bounds, independent of the coun
ties.” There is quite a difference in
the two statements, and Prof. R. was
not so critically correct, notwith
standing his careful reading.
The sacred right of the people,
whether as a church, an association,
town council or grand jury, to peti
tition the government “For a redress
of grievances” has been granted,
and is a high constitutional privilege,
and has never been interpreted as
tending to a consolidation of govern
ment with petitioners; the same con
stitution allows the one and inter
dicts the other; and there is no con
stitutional qualification or limitation
as to classes, associations or societies
of citizens thus petitioning the State
or Federal government.
1 am forever opposed to any com
bination of church and state, and
our peorle are, by a great majority,
a unit on that subject, and there is no
danger from that source as long as
Baptists and Pcdo Baptists (protes
tants) are in control of public senti
ment in this country.
I shall have nothing further to
say. J. G. McCall.
OHUROH MEMBERS AND WORLDLY
AMUSEMENTS.
Unfortunately, as I believe, these
two, church members and worldly
amusements, are often intimately
associated together.
“Worldly.” This word is used
in contradistinction to and as op
posed to tho words, religious, spirit
ual. AVo speak of a worldly “spirit,”
and do so always with the under
standing that it is a non-religious
non-spiritual, spirit. Worldly amuse
ments are those things in which the
worldly spirit manifests and seeks to
satisfy itself.
Just now tho world seems to be
running riot after amusements. AVe
are reminded of the legend of tho
“Jolly earth quake.” An island is
rent by an earth quake. The tragi
cal phenomenon is seen and felt and
heard by the crew of a distant ves.
sei. They draw near, and great is
their surprise.
Instead of finding the survivors
blanched with fear and stricken with
grief, they are boisterously and con
tinuously laughing. It is discovered
that through tho rent earth there
comes a strange gas which when
breathed sots the people at once to
laughing. They laugh around the
bodies of their dead and dying; they
laugh at funerals.
It would seem that tho devil in
casting abotit ' for some additional
plan by which io delude and destroy
had manufactured and impregnated,
the world’s atmosphere with laugh
ing gas, thereby destroying that
seriousness so neccessary to strength,
nobleness, righteousness.
“Nations iu their beginnings are
poor. Poverty is favorable to indus
try, industry loads to thrift and
wealth; wealth produces luxury, and
luxury results in enervation, corrup
tion and destruction.” This is tho
historic round which nations have
run. >
“Behold this was the iniquity
thy sister Sodom. Pride, fulness of
bread and abundance of idleness.”
Ours, though youngest is the rich
est nation of earth. AVe have passed
the points of poverty and competen
cy and have reached the points of
affluence and luxury.
There is a strong drift toward
self-indulgence and dissipation. There
is a popular demand for that which
amuses tho mind and excites the
emotions. The serious is scarcely
tolerated on the stage. Shakespeare
is at a discount. The comedian, tho
clown, tho negro minstrel attract-
Demand governs supply. The stage
furnishes what the people want.
Every city r town and village
ted by troups of questionable morals
furnishing amusements of unques
tionably bad morals. There is a
rapidly increasing volume of litera
ture whose only mission is to amuse
Public parks are being multiplied
and manipulated to meet this de
mand.
This spirit of self-indulgence, this
pleasure-seeking spirit, like many
other things that are of the world,
lias gotten into tho churches.
The plea is sometimes made by
and for such church members as run
in tho ways of the world, that peo
ple, young people especially, must
have some amusement. Perish the
thought that a Christian, young or
old, lives in this world to bo amused.
Such a plea misinterprets and mis
represents the nature and mission of
tho church and disciples of Christ.
The church is not a play bouse nor
a restaurant nor an insurance com
pany.
It is a workshop to build life-houses
for eternity; an army to light the
devil; a ship to send out the life
boats and throw out tho life-lines to
the perishing, and the crow has no
THE CHRISTIAN INDEX: THURSDAY FEBRUARY 2, 1893.
time to go on pleasure excursions or
fiddle and dance in the cabin.
“I came not to be ministered unto
but to minister,” said the Master.
Here is the example for every Chris
tian. To seek worldly amusements
is to indulge self, and self-indulgence
is essentially opposed to that which
is deepest and divinest in Christian
ity.
Indulgence in worldly amusements
is opposed to the example, the teach
ings, and the spirit of Christ.
Self-sacrifice, self-denial and self
crucifixion are enjoined upon every
Christian, and it is only as this law
is obeyed that one can glorify God
in bearing “much fruit,” and be
“conformed to the image of His son.”
But if worldly amusements were
not wrong per se, it would still be
true that no Christian has time for
such. Life is too short and its tasks
are too many and too great and too
serious. For the Christian to be en
gaged in worldly amusements is for
the watchman to go on a spree while
the enemy is stealing upon the city;
to feast while the air is being rent
with the cries of hunger.
"There are lonely hearts to cherish,
While tho days are noing by;
There are weary souls who perish.
While tho days are going by.”
The reaction upon the church and
its work from indulgence in worldly
amusements is fearful. Every Pas
tor meets it and it is about the hard
est thing he has to meet. The say
ing is true, “The world does not read
the Bible; it reads church members.”
The world only sees so much of
Christ as is reflected by his disciples.
What idea does the world get of
Christ and His religion from the lives
of those who indulge in the world’s
pleasure ? Ah! we know too well.
It is a sad but certain fact that
deep down in their hearts, people of
the world have no respect for, nor
confidence in, tho religion of church
members who freely mingle with
them in worldly amusements.
Again the matter of affinity enters
into this question. Character seeks
its level as well as water. A man
will be drawn toward that for which
he has affinity.
The drunkard will find the saloon,
worldly things w’ill attract the world
ly spirit, the gentleman will seek out
tho gentleman, and the Christian will
seek and fiind pleasure in that which
is Christian. Judas goes to “his own
place.” Peter and John, “being let
go, they went to their own compa
ny.”' ( j
A church member indulging in world
ly amusements is simply in his ele
ment, his church membership not
withstanding. “Now if any man
have not the Spirit of Christ he is
none of His.”
I do not believe that the Spirit of
Christ has anything in common with
worldly amusement.
Fashionable society is the curse of
the church, for it is here that world
ly amusements are most followed and
fostered.
I would rather the small-pox or a
cyclone would strike my church than
the influence of society life.
The dance, card table and theater
are tho most popular worldly amuse
ments, and are not one whit behind
the saloon in damage to church life
and prosperity.
R. K. Maiden.
Independence, Mo.
ASKED AND ANSWERED.
BY C. E. W. DOBBS.
The union spoken of iu Leviticus,
18: 18, does it imply nations where
men are permitted to have more than
one wife, alone, or is it a sin, and
maintianed as such by the Bible?
Student.
The marginal note reads “one wife
to another,” instead of|“a wife to her
sister.” Tho references point to
Gon. 4. Il) and 29: 18, which would
seem to show that the King James
translators thought tho passage for
bade polygamy. Others interpret it
as merely forbidding a man to mar
ry two sisters at tho same time, or
during the life of either. Scott says
“Some think this verso contains an
express prohibition of polygamy;
supposing tho word sister merely to
signify a wife, which tho person
spoken of had already married. But
though tho Mosaic law contains no
explicit allowance of polygamy; yet
there is no other passage which fa
vors tho interpretation of this text as
a direct law against it, and many
things in the whole subsequent his
tory imply a connivance at it.” Hen
ry says: “Verso 18, which forbids a
man to take a wife to her sister, sup
poses a connivance at polygamy, as
some other laws then did, (Ex. 21:
10; Dent. 21:16), but forbids a man
marrying two sisters, as Jacob did,
because between them, who had be
fore been equal, thero would be apt
to arise greater jealousies and ani-
mosities than between wives that
were not so nearly related. If the
sister of the wife be taken for the
concubine, or secondary wife, noth
ing can be more vexing in her life,
or as long as she lives.” The Canter
bury Revised Version reads: “Thou
shalt not take a woman to her sis
ter, to be a rival to her,” etc. As a
matter of fact polygamy was allow
ed among the ancient Hebrews (Gen.
4: 19, 1 Chron. 2: 18,) which at a
very early period seems to have
been restricted to two wives (1 Sam.
1: 2; 2 Chron. 54: 3), and which
seems to have been customary with
kings, 2 Sam. 5: 13; 12: 8; 1 Kings,
11: 3; 2 Chron. 11: 21; 13: 21; Jose
phus, Antiq. 17: 1-3), and promi
nent persons (Judges, 8: 30). Al
though the Mosaic law did not for
bid polygamy, and only restricted it
in the case of kings, (Deut. 17: 17),
yet its many enactments tended to
discourage, and finally to abolish,
polygamy (Ex. 21: 8, etc.; Lev. 15:
18). It faded out of Israel without
direct prohibitory legislation. No
direct prohibition of it is to be found
in the Christian Scriptures, yet it is
clearly contrary to the idea of mar
riage as set forth in Gen. 2: 24, and
our Lord’s teachings can be conse
quently interpreted only upon a
monogamic basis. The law of na
ture points to one man for one wo
man, and scripture allusions seem to
sanction this idea of marriage. It
may be added that Christians do not
live under the Levitical law.
Please explain what is meant by
the words “low church” and “high
church.” I see the papers speak of
the late Bishop Brooks as “low
church.” AVas he not a regular
Episcopalian?
Emmerson*'/
Yes, Bishop Phillips Brooks was
the Episcopal bishop of Massachu
setts. AV hen he was elected to his
high office, many Episcopal bishops
and clergyman strongly opposed his
ordination because of his extreme
low church view. This phrase is the
designation of a school or party in
the Church of Englandand the Episc
opal Church of the United Bates>
which in the department of the
sacraments, church governments and
escleslastical ritual, clings to the
principles for which the English re
• formers of the sixteenth century
contended. In contrast to the
school known as “high church,” item-
juqjifiuatioij by faith, denies
the doctrine of baptismal regenera
tion, and holds the Calvinistic (or
Zwinglian) doctrine of the Lord’s
supper, deprecating all approach to
the so-called “Catholic,” or high
sacramental view. Tho low church
party also disregards the doctrine of
apostolic succession, and, while it in
sists upon the Episcopal as the best
form of government, denies that
episcopacy is necessary to the being
of the church. In a word the low
church party is what is generally des
cribed as the “evangelical” wing of
tho Episcopal Church. Some years
ago one of thoir bishops (Cumm
ings) led a party out of tho church,
and organized what has since been
known as tho “Reformed Episcopal
Church.” This church and low
churchmen generally do not materi
ally differ with Baptists and Presby
terians in thoir preaching and teach
ing concerning tho plan of salvation.
They hold firmly to tho Pauline doc
trine as seen in Eph. 2: 8-10. It is
to be regretted that the high church
party is just now in the ascendency
in the Episcopal Churbh.
TO PREVENT THE GRIPP
Or any other similar epidemic, the
blood and tho whole system should be
kept in healthy condition. If you
feel worn out or have “that tired
feeling” in the morning, do not be
guilty of neglect. Give immediate
attention to yourself. Take Hood’s
Sarsaparilla to give stongtb, purify
the blood and prevent disease.
Hood’s Pills cure liver ills, jaun
dice, biliousness, sick headache>
constipation.
The Hove of the Country. —
At the late Baptist State Conven
tion of Alabama, Dr. Geo. B. Eager,
of Annistion, said that the hope of
this country was wholesome Baptist
literature, and that itshould be sown
knee deep throughout the land. The
American Baptist Publication So
city was organized to meet just
this demand. It proposes to send
colporteurs into hedges and bylanes
of city and country alike to take to
tho destitute families the gospel.
•‘Colporlago is preaching the gospel
of Jesus to the poor at their own
homes.”
Wm, McCarthy, 122 E. sth St., Cincinnati,
Ohio, writes: “I used Dr. Bull's Cough Syrup iu
tuy family with good results." We recommend
it to all beads of families as the best."
©he
NEHEMIAH'B PRAYER.
Lesson for Feb. 12th, 1893.
Scripture Lesson. Neh. 1:1-11-
Motto Text:—“Lord, be thou
my helper.” Psalm 80:10.
introduction.
The book of Nehemiah forms the
last link of Old Testament history.
Let us keep the points of the history
after the exile clearly in mind. A
bout 536 B. C, fifty thousand cap
tives returned from Babylon and set
themselves to rebuild the temple.
Twenty years later the temple was
completed and dedicated, B. C. 515.
Ezra at the head of several thousand
Jews returns to Jerusalem about B.
C. 457. This period of 80 years
from the return of the first company
to the coming of Ezra is covered by
the book of Ezra. After 12 years
perhaps uneventful, Nehemiah
takes up the thread of the history in
natural order and follows it on to a
bout 431 B. C. He gives a record
of the building of the walls of Jeru
salem and their dedication.
The ninety years since the return
under Zerubbabel have brought a
new generation upon the scene.
The temple was built with great dif
ficulty. The walls and gates are yet
unmended, so the people are expos
ed to every danger that may threat
en. A yet greater lack is in the res
toration of those teachings and prac
tices directed by Moses of which the
city and the temple are only an aid
and an outward expression.
Explanation.
Nehemiah.—A Jew who is cup
bearer to the Persian king, a position
of high honor very close to that of
the king. Chislen.—The Jewish
month corresponding nearly to our
December. Twentieth Year.—Of
the reign of Artaxerxes Longimanus,
being 445 B. C., 91 years after the
return from Captivity.
V. 2 I asked them concerning
. . . . Jerusalem. He did not wait
to be told. Nehemiah, though in a
foreign land, and in the enjoyment
of great honor and priyilege, is not
forgetful of his brethren in their
wretched condition. All honor to
the man who in the midst of success
and worldly promotion is yet true to
his religion, and has such religion as
shows strong sympathy for all weak
and suffering oneu.
V. 8. Affliction and bs
proach. Sad is the picture present
ed to his view. “Hard times” were
those through which the remnant
were passing. Dark clouds were
about them, through which came no
rays of light or hope. From a most
unexpected source a bright beam
will now burst upon them.
AL 4. Mourned and Wept.
Their sorrows he makes his own.
Perhaps he has not known before
how great are his people’s sufferings.
His sorrow soon finds a right outlet-
He takes the matter to God in
prayer.
V. 5. That keepeth covenant
and mercy. “All the power of God
which strikes terror into the hearts
of those who oppose him will be
used in the fulfillment of his prom
ises.”
Vs. 6,7. AVe have sinned.
Confession of sin must ever be a
part of our prayer to God. Here
there is real confession, no excuse
or palliation.
Vs. 8, 9. Remember. AVe know
not what to pray for as we ought.
God has promised many things.
Let us remember them and know
they are good. The threat has
been fulfilled. He now looks for
the fulfilling of the promise.
Vs. 10, 11. God's part, care and
mercy, are taken as a pledge of fu
ture help and blessing. And right
ly so, “He that spared not his own
son, but delivered him up for us all,
how shall he not with him also free
ly give us all things?” Prosper
thy servant. Herein Nehemiah
reveals to us that he has a mind to
work for things for which he prays,
that some plan of action is already
outlined in his mind. The earnest
ness of this prayer is thus attested
by his being willing that the Lord
shall work through him the things
desired.
SOME ELEMENTS OF REAL PRAYER,
AS ILLUSTRATED BY PRAYER
OF NEHEMIAH.
1. Prayer must be the expression
of a real need, a felt need. Much
that goes among men for praying
may bo but a saying of prayers, a
repetition of forms, an idle mockery
from which no good can come.
2. Prayer must involve some cor
rect and adequate apprehension of
him to whom it is addressed. God
is “ten ible,” as well as “remember
ing mercy.” Not regarding him
aright there can be no proper hu
mility or reverence or sense of un
worthiness and guilt Without
these what is to be our plea?
3. It ought not to seem necessary
to insist that there can be no right
approach to God without confession
of sin. Yet we do sometimes forget
the emphasis Christ himself has
placed upon the duty of repentance
and confession of sin. Let us be
ware.
4. Prayer should be a pleading
of God’s promises. All our wants
need to be tested by his word. That
for which we seek we should have
God’s warrant for in as nearly every
case as possible. AVhat has he pro
mised? Let us search his word and
test our wants thereby.
5. For one to pray aright he
must be willing to help answer his
own prayers. He must be ready
that God may use him as the means
through which his desires may be ac
complished. If he pray for the re
lief of the poor he must go and min
ister personally to them. Prayer
for the sending forth of more labor
ers iuto the harvest must be attend
ed by the spirit that can say. “Here
am I, Lord, send me.”
Let us be more constant in pray
er, observing these essential elements."
So shall we know there is use in
praying and dearer will be the priv
ilege of saying. Abba Father.
OHUROH DISCIPLINE.
I read, in yesterdays Index, the
article on “Church Discipline,” by
brother Law of Texas. It was op
portune and wise. There is nothing
that so hinders the progress of the
gospel as the loose manner of life of
church members. As a rule, church
es have become very negligent in
the duty of keeping separate from
the world.
Allusion was made to the com
mand: “Not forsaking the assembling
yourselves together as the manner
of some is.” Since the days of the
apostles there have been members
who have violated this law of Christ,
Baptist churches have adopted rules
for the enforcement of this law.
Fjity years ago these rules were
more common than now. The evil
has grown very rapidly in the last
twenty year. It has resulted from
the careless manner in which mem
bers are received into the churches.
The religious craze has been, of
late years, to attend meetings of
professional evangelists. A great
crowd is brought together; the larger
part from curiosity. There is always
a kind of mesmeric influence gener
ated by a crowd. At these meetings
all sorts of propositions are made.
Christians present feel that they
must vote for them all, or else, be
considered wanting in true religion.
All are called upon to “testify.” A
large number rise and state that they
love Jesus, and some go so far as to
state that they are perfectly free
from sin. The young are moved by
what they see and hear, and feel
that they ought to join such good
people. The meeting closes with
the publication that from two to five
hundred conversions have occurred-
The greater part of this number
is made up of small boys and girls.
At the first conference held by the
Baptist church in the place, a num
ber of boys and girls belonging to
Baptist families come forward and ask
to be received into church member
ship. They say they love Jesus and
desire to be numbered with his
people and with them to serve the
Lord. It is a rare case that one of
these after baptism ever attend a
prayer-meeting. They become more
and more negligent in attendance
on church services. They prefer the
society of rude boys and worldly
minded girls. Not unfrequently the
boys curse and use bad language,
taking oare that the older members
of the church do not hear them.
They are continued in church fellow
ship as long as they do not commit
murder or burglary or something of
that kind.
AVhen young persons from these
tent meetings apply for membership
let them be told as John the Baptist
told those who claimed baptism on
the ground that they were the des
cendants of Abraham. “Bring forth
fruits meet for repentance.” AVait
to see if there is a change in life
corresponding to a change of heart.
Mr. Spurgeon once asked a servant
girl what evidence she had that she
was a Christian ? She replied, I now
sweep under the door mat.” True
religion makes one more faithful in
his work. For tho want of care in
the reception of members, many
have been baptized who do not take
pleasure in worship and therefore
forsake the assembling with the
worshipers of God. A truly regen
erated soul feels as did David, a man
after Gods heart,: “I was glad when
they said unto me let us go iuto
house of God.” “I had rather be &
door keeper in the house of Go<
than to dweH in the tents of wicked,
ness.
AYorship which has to be enforced
is not acceptable to God.
Instead of passing rules to compel
members to attend church services,
let the church appoint a prudent
committee to see such and by search,
ing questions, find out if they havq
no heart for the public worship of
God. Should it be found that they take
no pleasure in the services of reli.
gion, the committee should recom
mend their-exclusion. Baptists be
lieve in a regenerated membership,
and as soon as it is ascertained that
a member gives no sign of a renewed
heart by his continued neglect of
God’s house, he should no longer be
held in fellowship, and thus allowed
to clog the church in her progress, i
Next week I propose to discuss
the treatment of drinking and gamb
ling members.
AVilliams Rutherford.
Athens, Ga.
NOW “PERFORM THE DOING OF IT."
I have a thought, Would that I could
“wreak item expression!”
W. Cary Crane, when a very young
man, printed a sermon, at the close of
which he told a story of Pericles pro
pounding a policy when Athens was
threatened with invasion, so meeting
universal assent, that nothing else was
added; but an old general drew his sword
and said, “What he says, I’ll do.”
Two men preached, once upon a time*
The text of the first one was, “Preach
the Word,” the other “followed.” ,An
old “hardshell,” remarked, on the yard
“What one said the other did.”
Who can find time to read the half
they send us, telling us how to preach?
If they would send us a real, sure
enough gospel sermon, once in a while,
it might be better.
I have known a few persons who said
nothing whatever about it; but men all
the time going about doing good, nota
bly some women, wives and maidens.
Tho American Messenger is, and al
ways has been remarkable for bringing
salvation to the understanding and
the heart. I know of no other such re
ligious paper. Dr. A. W. Chambliss,
once observed that everything in it was
worthy to be written in letters of gold
on the walls of our chambers.!
They sent a young man to an obscene
place in a great city one afternoon, who
however got out of himself into Christ
and our James B. Taylor of hallowed
memory, as he came out of the little
chapel said, “that sort of preaching does
my soul good.” The young man spoke
with an unction from the Holy One, of
the promise that now is and of that
whidh is to como, and not a word of self
or of the little corner supposed to meas
ure his size.
How often the sheep look wistfully
up, aud the hay we offer them is un
palatable! oh, for power to feed the
sheep! to preach Christ instead of preaoh 1
ing about Him. To do his will, seen or
unseen, heartily, joyfully.
E. B. Teasus.
A PURE HOME?
There is nothing on earth for which
we ought to be more thankful than for
having been brought up in the atmosy
phere of a pure home. Such a horn- ’
may be narrowjand even hard. It may
be deficient in material comforts and ut,
terly lack the graceful amenities than
lend a charm to human life! but it has is '
it the forces on which great characters (
are nurtured, One of our best friends—, ‘
a man as sturdy as a forest oak—once
said to me, “I was the son of poor pa.
rents, and from my youth up was inured
to self-denial and hardship; but I do not
remember ever to have' heard a word
from either my father or mother that
was not as chaste as the driven enow.”
Better such a recollection as that than
an inheritance of millions of mouey.
GODS MADE TO ORDER.
A queer expression, to be sure, but i<
only describes a line of business carried
on extensively in heathen lands. Hero
is tho translation of a Chinese adver
tisement: “I will execute to order idols
from two-feet high to the size of a mar
moscl monkey, or the biggest and moss
hideous monster that can inspire the
human mind with awe and reverence for
religion. If the idol is the size of an or
ang-outang, the price will be $700; of tho
sphinx size $400: the size of a bull-dog
with horns and hump s6so;a buffalo size
$800; a dog size -200; and the size of an
ass, in the attitude of braying, SIOOO.
UH 1/C rr(7Hr ’*»» known b, moi.tnre
fl A V£ «N* per.ptraUon. O*U|» uuoh Itching
YOH DEEDING or IboTMUBIMO B k£S
! VU TIIXD AT Oircn TO
CAT OR. BO SAN KO'S PILE REMEDY,
17 £/ / which acta dlraotljr on part* UectaL
_ abaorbatumor*.allayaltohi n<,affaottng
Pl! ITO apcrmanantoure. Frio* &Oo . Dru«ciata
• / <»£ O or mall. Dr. Boaanfco. Philadelphia. Pm
johnsonljrass
AND —
MclilotuH Seed,
Wo hove a good supply of choice, well clean*
o>l Johnson Grass anil Midilotus Seed for sale
Correspondence solicited.
C. YOUNG & BRO.. Solms. Ala
2feb«t cow
UYfIHHWU/ICC S* TS SHE CANNOT SEE HOW
■ I MpnggJ Wirt YOU DO IT FOR THE MONEY.
■ffsauMMfe, tin I. too i ■,.***. o«rwe»*ew
<la sew| O < Msiblrta; perfect wee blag. rababte.
Q&-WiffiH SniEhM. »lat>«e4 «• llfbl aal beery weeb.
1 V IWI - «i«b aaoiaplaM R« sf tba lassat Iwiare*e4aUai*aaa«l
i F.l Kaab emoMm lacamaUM Day
F*f •’*** * ur **•*»»• 4 * u * r *
i »** ”» rKEI T * ,AL w 4 rRU t'ATUouu*
3 t OXFORD MFG CO., DEPT. N CWcsge, HL
Q No Tobacco. oAS*.
(1 { 9 Tha only practicable
M J w\, I way to reach •
fr.J thoroughly and pleasantly.
1 /A positive cure even if all else
F has failed. Sample FREE by maR
I \'Y7 On. J. w. BLOaSER aca.f
1 DALTON »»