Below is the OCR text representation for this newspapers page.

*9l\A vtf-* ‘ r ' # ’ 1 VT 1 -i<? f to oe found the power in C-.iiucls o j prescribing the tin-.e, place and thannc of mskmg returns ? That such a p wcv cxifted fonrewhere could not he denied, a? without it an eleftion would he nu j *, y. Will it be contended that this power 7s vetted in the genera! govern ment : when it is not recognized by a tingle word of the coulltlutton ? It is citdt, then, that as the conililui.iou is pcrfcdFy silent as to bellowing such a power in the general government, it does not belong to that government ; nei ther wa it necessary to carry into effcdl any power fpecifieally given to the ge nera! government- If, th- n, the pv er docs not belong to congress, 2 j it, niuft reside somewhere, it follows front the theory of our government that it must belong to the Hates ; auu that the only i>owrer in this house on the fubjcfl isvlo judge of the returns ; not to utcide the time, place, and ma after in which tne\ flu 11 be made, much lei's to dispense with the regulations which the dates irav uvke relative to them. But it may peihaps b afice.l, b w the judicial power of this houie can be exercised without unit.ug with it the power con-, tended for on this occafioti ? i'o this en qu y the aniwt • is eaty—the light to judge and 1 tie: luic of decifiou aie ddlinCt things, and while the right to judge may be in one body, the piefo-iption of the rule may be in another. The rule in such cases is theie mutt b: a itate re gula’ion, when it relates to pi iute on which the flutes have exclusive lcgifla tion. If this case -relate to a buiinefs i;i which Ge-irgia has the exclulive right to legifl.ite, there can be 110 oilier ruic than fitrlegiflatioa. In order to illus trate this tab , luppofe good votes tnouiu be offered after the expiration of the time within which the eicifftoi was di rected to be held by slate laws ; will it be contended that this house would have a right to direct them to be received ? Or that the constitutional rights of the house would be impaired by being obh ged to refpeCt the regulations of a slate *3 to the time, place, and manner of holding elections? jult so a3 to returns. The conftitutionai right of the house to judge of them is not impaired becaute a rule of judging is preferred by andtner authority. Nothing is more common than this ; it is indeed, a leading fea ture in all the political in dilutions of the United Ste. T-.e power to judge being velted in one body, and the pres cription of the rule in another. All of cur political writers have contidered this as one of the m.dt important feature* -in our inffitutiona. If we can dispense in this in flan ce, with the tme fixed for receiving returns, we may chfpenie with slate regulations in other cases. If we tan dlfpenfe with one rule, we can uis peofe with ail; and while the Hates are lunftitutionally fixing rules, we may be •thfpenfing with them; a conciuliori at which common fenfc revolts. With regard to tbe prevalence of the ’tyitU-tpieffed by a majority of the good given, it was observed, that that could be only ascertained by tome legal provision, and that the only way of guar” lmg it from afcufe was to preserve the, laws of the Hate inviolate ; and that al tho’ in lome few instances a rigid adhe rence to t era might be prouudtive of lome hardthip, yet in its general effedt* it would be produ&ive of much greater good : and, it was added, tnat that lpe ctes of reatoning was as novel as uufouud, which went to protect the rights ot the citizens of a Hate by proltiaiuig the law* made to secure them. To Ihcw that the law of Georgia, li miting the time within which votes liiould be received, was obligatory up on the house, an elaborate argument was gone into, to prove, by a minute dilLc. uon of the constitution, that inaimuch cs all powers not expielsly given to the general government wcrcreterved to the people or the tlateb, and inaimuch as the inly powers fpecitkatly given related to the time, place and manner of holding eftftious, and not to the time, place and manner of making returns, no luch pow er resided in congress. From all this leatoning it was conten ded, that though the house had a right to judge of the returns of its members, A that righ’ unuit be exercised in obedience to the rules fixed by the Hate of Geor gia, which conHitutionady poffcffed the power of preferibing them, and that they mull be coulidered as conciufive, Ufiltfs revoked or modified by congress. The friends of the np.rt remarked tiiat the powers of the House on this fulj dt was veiled, by that part of the contluu t'on which oeelares that “ each House inall be the judge ol the elections, teturns and qualification* of its own members ;” and that this power was diftiuct from that which gave ultimately to the legis lature, in case they saw fit to exercise it, the power of determining the time, place and manner of holding tleftiori*. The words, judging of te utns, were cemp r e- henfive, uureltnCted, and inclufire of eve ry Hep incidental making returns. The power could not be confined to the mere judging of authenticity of the cer tificate of the returning officer, as that would be nugatory. It inu;t iikewife include ti.e manner in which the vote* were counted, in diffrifts ; the manner in v nich they were tranfmirted ; the place jppointed for receiving them ; and the a leer; tilling of their aggregate number. 3. haO been truly said, that where the* bufir.ets of the election ceases, that of the returns begins ; which, therefore, mutt b’ coniiaercd as embracing every ttm , ai.cr t.i. vatc* were given. A, 10-m .. aiiclictiou termi. atis, the candidates is euctrd, the ouly thing rcth-.i,!.. .* to -? P the re'ilt ; ntr J Go •he retuiii6 made. What, then, is the right if this House to judge ? Accoiding this e-er let. n, they have nut a right t judge o the certificate of the cffic- rs ct G'-gia; t! ;y have not a right to judge how tlie votes are tranimitteri ; but 01 afl th’S ‘he govrrno’ - is to judge, under a law of Georgia. But such a law would be a mere nullity, as it would be in diic.it opposition to the words of the ccnftitu t ion, which give to this House the entire right of judging of the returns of its members. The sass was that the law of Georgia could only be considered as con diluting the governor the oigan of in* formation to this House, which is the on.y tribunal, to which the returns can ultimately he made So conudering the fuhjcdl, there was no realon for the re mark, that the principle contained in the report went to fctafiJe the law of Geor gia. SiKMild the power of the H -use, in this cate, be denied it woul-i prevent us from investigating any case, however charadler.fed by fraud, and would pto flrate, at the teet of an executive officer, the power so guardedly bellowed on each House. It ‘5 enquired whether we wiil set aside the law of Georgia by thedeci fion we are about to make; but it docs not fodoiv 1 fiat the adoption of the re port will have this effett. The law of Georgia lay-- that the governor lhall count the votes motived at a certain day s but it does not lay that the House lhall not count thole received afterwards. We, in fa£t,tiieu carry into effect the law of Georgia as far as it goes, and only, in cate of a failure, supply the deficiency. Couid there be a doubt of the principle assumed in the report, it would Lit’ remo ved by a denial of it giving the power to any petty officer of the flute, by fuupres liug tue votes, to deprive the member, legally elected, of his feat. Would this be a juit principle i Is it notour pnn eiple tp*. a majority fliali govern? And is it nft ii.rai.ge 10 fay, that a slate lhall have die right ofviolat mg fuels a prmci Witn regard to a return, it might im i y two tilings ; tfie original certificate o* the preTiding officer in each election diitrici. , and the general certificate of the whole dcCtion, the several p uts of which’ woe lieid in different places. It was ncc.-ffary tfiat these several ceriiti car s Ihi.tlu Le examined by lomc general au' !j’ ■. As 4 matter, then. tore o ne ceffi.y, fome authority ain't r.iide 111 the flutes, to count up tne whole number ot votes, b.l to certify the pctlon* elected, riua poeer was veiled in different ways 111 tile it feral lutes. Whoever ex I. filed it Could le or. iy contidered as tht certi lying ofitter, wnofe certificate was not a <Jec.Uou,3ut limply a return, fubj.ct to the contioi ofthis House, which u made by the con flit ut ion, tile ju ige of it. Ihe confliiuton fays the Houl. arc to judge of ttie returns. Can thole tetui ns, tiiere tore, be eonclulive and binding upon the Houle? It so, the power of judging la altogether nugatory. If we cannot go out ot ttie returns, and judge ot any thing not in them, we cannot be laid to pofleis any power over them. But ihe word* ot the conttuutiuH are precite ; giviug the unreltridtd power iu judge. The House then may receive other evi dence to loiisiy them, than that found on the face ot ttie returns, and on iuch evi dence may either allow that waich is nut in them or dilallow that which it. I A case has been put, of votes received m | contravention of a Hate, after the time , tixed tor receiving tueai ; and it lias been j laid that theie votes ought not to be re ! ceived. Why ? Becaule the time ot hoi- I ding elections being exprelsiy vetted in j the lla.e legislature, in the tirit inttancc, j and Congrcts not Having changed the pre j leribed tune, the ltatc regulation mult j prevail. But let the calc purlued tur- I ther : suppose luch votes are not only J received, but included in returns made to j ihc governor ; —he is not to judge of the j legality oi the votes given ; toe Hate law 5 only uirctts him to count up the votes I rtturned ; whether they ought or ou 6 ht j not to be received he cannot ju Ige ; of this the Houle is the judge. He cannot i receive evidence out oi tne returns ; lie j therefore cvuiuupthe votes; proclaims j the person naving tbe highcit number; and me returns are forwarded to this ,) body. Tile) are in due hum ; but votes j appear to bp admitted which, Ly the law • ot Georgia, ought not to have beeu aj : mitted Is the liouie concluded by tins return ? Are they not, on the coutrarj, go out ot it, and receive evidence oftiie lact, that luch improper votes were admitted ? No one wnt deny ti. Further—luppofe the preliding ot ticer to have refuted voteo offered in time ; suppose he had reiufed all tile votes given tor a candidatein leveral eou .ties, the go veruor could no. pay any attention to ihcle votes ; lor his certiiieate mult be founded exclulively on the votes returned 11 him—He would be obliged, theretore, to certify at duly elettti', the perlon having the highcit numb-rof such votes, although it might be proved that the lupprelfcd votes, if counted, would have given the highelt number to another can didate. Could not the Houle, in this case, go out of the returns oi the gover nor, and allow the votes fairly given, to be counted ? Is the election to be affe&eci by such oaudio i or neglect ! Clearly not. In the prefect calc, the votes in qicition, according to the law of Georgia, were lawfully given, and ought to have beer, returned. Had that iaw been observed, they would have been returned. In otic iclpect ouly was there a neglect of it. — Gan that, then, be Hid to be a violation f the law of Georgia, which corliit* in iving effect to its provisions, which they nave failed to he observed ? The great principle in judging oi cUctions, cwjit ‘o be, that the will of the peopV, fairly cxpitflcd, lhall govern. And that con llvuCtion of the conflitntion and laws of the IT S. ought to prevail, which coufills in giving effect to good votes, rather than deflroying them. This is the principle ot the report. The ftdqption of a hofti'e principle, would be to facrifice the lubflance of election 10 its mere ihadow. The fuggeltion that the principle of ihe report is calculated to alarm the j a lousy of the flate* is ideal. Thejudg ing of the election of members is a joint authority; redding in ;he slates in the firlt mltance, and ultimately in this house. It the controlling power does ; not reside here, it rdides no where ; ‘there is a blank in ihe government. It I cannot reside in Georgia, for the power lis not concurrent, ami it not tiere, ihe j slates mult inevitably submit to every irregularity that may be pradded by subordinate agents. It has been laid that the law of Georgia is in force, but it can have no force at the expeuce of the conftitu.ioual power of the house. But was that law complied with ? It so, the preftnt Conte it would not cxnt. It was true, that the general princi pie is a found one, which 1 paraies exe cutive, legislative, aud judicial power. This might be an arguui. ui for ihe in. ftuution of a fp-eul tribunal for the trial of eouteiteU elections, but it is an abundant anlwer to sh w, ihat this has not done ; but in :t, on the con trary, the constitution 01 .he general go-’ vernmeot ai well as the con dilutions of the several Hates have made the legifla live homes juugts 01 the eleClious of their members. In tlie coutfe of the difeuflion, the fads as Hated 111 the report, wue eithei considered as perLcuy correct, or as par taking lo little of error as not to invali date the conclulions drawn from them. Some imall divcilicy ot opinion exilltd I between the Committee ot je-iecuous and the fitting member, which wa*, However, j reconciled 011 explanation. The debate j whole, and was afierwarus pro), cutcd in ‘tne House. Messrs, J Bindley, ! Btdwell, G. W. Campbell ujid Litner ! advocated: and M.3srs. M 30, Early, | bioan, Ellis, N. YV iliiams, Broome and i (Quincy oppoled uie report 1 In the courte 01 the otfeuflion, vari ous precedents were quoice., from the j Journals of the houie, lonic ot which j were considered as applicable to one h jC, aim teiuic as applicable t# the other ii ie ot the quelt.ou at issue 1 but on a tuil examination of them, tl)ey Hied so faint a light on tne lubj ct tnit w have co. lido u it uuucCefl-.y to nptice them. The tea aud Bays were It he 11 taken on the hr ft member of the rcio'.ution iubnotted Ly the committee of elections, | viz. “ That t>owies Mead, returned to tins houie as a member thereof for the Hate of Georgia, is not entitled to a feat.”—Yeas 68—Nays 53 —as follows. Yess.—Meffrs, And.rfon, Archer, Bard, Barker, Bassett, Bedlinger, Bet ton, Bidwell, Bishop, Blake, jr. Blount, Brown, Bryan, Buttler, G. YV. Camp bell, Chandler, Chirtenden, Claiborne, J. Clay, Ciopton, Conrad, Crownin lhietd, Dana, Dawson, BUiot, Elmer, Eppes, Findley, Fdk, Fowler, Garnett, Gray, Gregg, Hailey, Hamilton, Hoi- I land, Holmes, Jacklon, Junes, Knight, Lewis, jr. Mailers, N. R. Moore, Mor row, Mumtord, Newton, jr. Olin, J. Randolph, T. M. Randolph, Rea, of Pen. Richards, Sammons, Sandtord, Schur.eman Seaver, Snniie, O’B Smith, S. Smith, Stanton, T. YV. Thompson, A. Trigg, Van Rensselaer, Varnum, Walton, Whitehill, M. Williams, Wil son and Winlten. Nays.— MelTrs. Alston, jr. Broome, Boyle, Casey, M. Clay, Clinton, jun. Cook, Cutts, Darby, Davenport, jun. Carle, Early, Ellis, Ely, Guodwyn, Green, Heiins, Hough, Kelly, Kenan, Leib, Livmglton, Ma 6 ruder, Madilon, Meriwether, Morrow, lvlolefly, j. Nel son, K. Nellou, Titken, jun. Pugh, Quincy, K.iea, Ten. Kullctl, banly, bioan, J. C. bmith, Southed, Staulcrd, b.urges, Taggart, Tailmaage, Tenney, Thomas, Tracy, Van Cortlaudt, Verp lauck, VVadlworth, vVtntehill, Wickts, D. R. Wilium*, N. Williams, aud vVynn*. And then the yeas and nay* were ta ken on the remaining members of the refoluiion. “ I’hat Thomas Spalding is entitled t i a feat in mis house, a* a r. prcfentative of the Hate ot G.orgia,”—Yea* 66. Nays yz. WASHINGTON <£ITY, Jan uary (). Our re nters arc to tne enlight ened and indefatigable exertions of Colonel iiawkins to ameliorate the e rndit on of the abong.ues oi the country, by ißirwducing among them the bleiling* of civilization.—— f he tucceis with which these efforts have been attended in he short period often years i.a without a parallel in the hittory of lavage nations. Convinced tiiat whatever rebates to a lnbjr& so intcreiting, and lb deservedly dear to the just pride of our countrymen, wiil oe peruied with plcafure, we offer them a n ch treat in the fol.owing itrikii g specimen ot Indian eloquence. IN the year 1797, ISTEHOCE fcal led by tne whit* people the adjutant) vi fr.ed th agent for Indian affair*. ‘This old man was elleemed by all.who knew inm, being an honed roan communica tive and jocular, and when a boy was ap pointed by the chiefs of the Creek nation to make the fire of welcome for general Oglethorpe on his full atrival to take poffcffiou of and cdablilh the colony of Georgia. There were then at the reh ..ence of the agent, the principal chiefs of tiic twelve town, of the lower Cre-ks. Their o!j cl -.vas to prevail on the a gent to give up the plan of civilization and to conform himlYlf in the manage ment of lr.dian affairs to the caprice and in file nee of the Indians. Their converfatien on this fuHed laded foi three days and became iufolent in tlie extreme on the lafl day. Itlehoche re mained on-his bear skin, iilent beater until the thirJ day, and then had the following dialogue with the agent. Istcbjcke. Father, have not you white people a book which tells when jrou were created, and where, there are two of them, a small one attached to a large one, which 1 remember to have seen when a boy ? stgent. \ es, go on. Ijleboche . 1 1 is true that when E fmgiutb M'Jf-e (the matter of Breath) made you white people, that he madt of you, a man and a woman, and he made a garden for them, and put all the good things in it and gave it to these two while people, and is this in the hook f /gent. Yts, go on, litcbochc. Wnen he made these two people and every thing for them he cal led up the woman and gave her a t,i(k. Woman, lays he, 1 have made all these things for you, and they are all good, but the giapes they ate not ripe, you mud not eat them, and then Ff iuga'ub Mijf e left her. 1* this iu the book ? s/gent. Yu, go on. liteboche. When Efaugatuh MifTe left her and went off, the h ake came up and afk.d what did he fay—that the gmpes are not ripe ? Woman, they are ripe, they are good, eat them. 1* this in the book ? /gent. Yes, go on. litehoche. By and by, Efnugatuh MiHee came back, and looking round hint, exclaims, ha ! ha! who bag Ipoil ed my tables ? who has spoiled my ta bles ? The woman replied, the fnakt has (polled your tables ; he told me the grapes were tipe, advised ine to eat them, and I did eat them. “ Did he fpotl my tables ? Go then, woman, and math Ins head, and tell your children to mash his head.” Is this in the book ? /Igent. Yes, go on, Istehoche. 1, ever since I heard this story, remember it, and that you white people when you fee a fr.ake you kill it. The talk was not given to me or my people s 1 never killed a snake. In my hunting or travelling if I fee them, they generally give way to me, aud if they are cross 1 give way to them I luppofe something has vexed thrm, I leave them, there it room enough foi me and them. I am now an old man a* you fee, can just creep about, and ruy greatest. pleasure is to crawl here to fee and converse with you, and take a dilh of coffee with you. Your plan of civilt zation I think I comprehend, and 1 be lieve it is for the good of my nation. 1 am very* old as you fee, and was a har dy lad when gen. Oglethorpe came fir It to Savannah ; then I was appointed by my father to make a fire for him, and welcome him to our land ; and when grew up to manhood, 1 accompanied him in his attack on St. Auguliiue a gamit the Spaniard*, and from that day I have alfociated much with while peo ple, am greatly attached to them, particu. (arly thofc in authority, from whom 1 have received many aits of kindness, and it is a pleafuri- to be able to fay to you, that I never Hole a fltin’s worth of pro perty in my .life, or did any injuiy to a white man. I am old as you fee, and have seen more than any chief in my land. I have lilteued to your plan, I am pleased with it, and if 1 was young I would soon prove to you tiiat there would be no other difference between us than the color of our Ikin. ] am old as you fee ; and I firmly belirvc that Walh iiigton, like Efaugatuh miffee, has giv. en a talk for the salvation of us red peo ple, that you have brought and delivred this talk to us ; that these people are playing the Inakc, and that unless yon take and inalh their head* (clenching hit fifts and knocking his knuckles together repeatedly) you will not lucceed in your plan—you will not fuected in your olari. After this fpctch, the old man laid himfeif down on lus bear tkin, thelilten ing chiefs fat in file rice for a few minutes, then rote up, and went off without lay ing one word. BENJAMIN HAWKINS. I, Timothy Barnard, atfiffant agent and interpreter for the lower Greeks, do hereby certify the foregoing to be cor rectly reported. TIMOTHY BARNARD. A Jf’t If Interpreter. NINTH CONGRESS. HOUSE or REPRESENTATIVES. Thursday, January 2. Mr. Vurnum, from the committee to whom v<as referred that part of the mes sage of the president, which relates to the organization and clafli Beat ion of the militia, made a detailed and argumenta tive report in part, which concludes with recommending the following resolu tion. Refined, That it is inexpedient so a dopt mealurts for tbe cUnification or new organization of the mil; ta. Referred to a committee cf the whole on Monday. Mr. (Jregg, from the committee o/. public land*, made a report on the peti tion of Geo. ‘Turner, u.navorable to the fame. Wtircupon, Refolvcd, that the prayer of the petition of G-o. Turner not to be granted. i Mr. Sai!/y , from the commi tee p jr pointed to conltder the expediency o relating the aCt of mitigating or remit* ting finrs and penalties, made a detailed report, with an accompanying bill, to ex end jurffdi&ion in certain cases to the slate judges and slate courts ; which was referred to a committee of the whole house on Tutlday next. The house went into a committee of the whole on the bill for eltablifhing rules and article* for the government ot the armies of the L\ State*.—Mr. J. C. Smith in the chair. The bill was taken pp by feftions. On reaching the 8 h article, which atithorifei a court martial lo pumfh with tlenlh or otherwise any one who, be ing prelcnt at any mutiny or sedition, does not use his ut mod endeavor to lup prefs the fame, or coming to the know ledge of any intended mutiny, does nots without dilap, give information thrr-of to h's commanding officer,” —Mr. C. IV. Campbell moved to fluke the word. “ death or other wifi.” -Meflrs Va. mini and Mel Ton opposed tlk niotion, which was difagired to without a divifinn. ‘lna fabfeq’uent artic!;, Mr. G. l iff. CftmpheH inuveii to Hrike out that pan, ivhu:h authordes a court martial to pun uk with death any one who qffer* vi olence to his 1 lficer. Mess s G. YV. Campbell, Cook, Southard and Talmagc tupported, and Meflrs. Ncllon, Snniie aud Macon op poled it ; when the qurllion wa* put, and the motion loft—Ayes 20. A* the* comm.lite progressed in lead ing the bill, numerous amendments; prin cipally verbal, were made. The committee then rose, reported progress, and a. ked leave to fit again, which was granted. The S/>eiier laid before th - ffeuf a let ter J tom, be Sec: et ary f State , ene-tfrig a report on the memorial of Peter Lamt .is. / petition was pijented /> 0.0 funelry hat lets oj Boston, Jitniiar in tenor to that fioni certain baiters oj Philadelphta , aticl referred. Mr. J. C. Smith, from the committee of (lairs, J'ubmii/ed a bill for tht relief of the governor, feci etarf and judges of the terri tory N. IV. of the Ohio which was refer red to a committee nj t he whole House. utsnatcm. .'wiWJj*iinr>ruß>Maii Trrf.-. wtmmsm RE PUB LIC A N. savannah, January 24, 1806'. ■MnbMM.wva.wiM “ ijifTß mimj-t Having given til? moll of the foreign intel ligence in tin day’s Republican in an Extra ‘beet, on Tuei lay I*ll, our dith of nr an is not In highly seasoned as we c uM with. ‘I he ue hate, however, of the Ilquleof itejirelenu tives of the V. S. on the eontelted eleftoin 1 1 Cowles Mead, el’q. t'r in Ihm lute, together with a few other fclciffions, will, we render our paper of to-day tolerably paUtofle, To correspondents- I The Limner No. 12, is received and flail appeAr in our next. The politicnl essay of Philo* flail Me* Wife have an early insertion. ANFCDO 1 KS* A Jack |Kt tch in It (ted tlpon leading an innocent man to ex petition. While the noose was preparing, the unhappy vidtirn ie with great earned <|efs, and laid there inuli furcly ije fume mirtake, as he had com nitted no crime, and there wai 1)0 warrant for his death. “ l\tc in your neck.” laid Jack - t “ you can complain agaioft me if I am wiong, you know my res ponsibility. An evidence in court speak ing in a very haifli and loud voice, rhe lawyer employed on the ocher fide exclai ned, in an angry manner, Follow, v/hy tlost thou iratk. so furioufiy ?” “ Becauie, (replied the tuilic,) I think I fers a thief.” AUCTION. TOMORROW, THE 2 S th in ft. Win e solij at 12 o’clock, THE SCHOONER Vicl OJiy ’ AS (he now lays aC lluntkr’* wharf, burthen 7 o tons, and well found. CONDI l lONS—Approved notes, at 2 and 4 months. o. H. dtackhoulc, A uct’r. J in. 24 4.3_ (TflTckliF ijiscouN 1 and deposit. Savannah, Jan. 21, 1806. AN cleftion t'.ran afliflant clerk., 111 room of Mr lame* Armltror.g, promoted, will take, ■dace at Bank n WcTih f-s-.y next the 29th !r, t. Candidates are r-quclted ro fend in heir applcattons on or before tiiat day with he riamnut those they mean to oflei a* thier secui tics. Thomas Meridcnhall, fan. 24 2t 1 C • Shier. BibK, < FKERS f>r tale for calh, or ’ arierfor N gro' - i, t ncc houses and ! ds in the vi. age of br. o-u , one vhich wa* inintr'.y oCt vpied oy S/e • | nhci. .Tou.it, la/., of -his t.fy, d t-c. /he 1 ‘|iher /.V3 a*Jj niT: g. Fci par tcoU-s i .ppl to Ir. J .na/han Crue, in h - vini.'.ah, r in Wdvne-fb ‘nugtt to Stephen Rlou’it. Jiil. 24. *Ol. 4^-