Below is the OCR text representation for this newspapers page.

ifit should eventually , '.Hippek, >v .r’i that of t e Bank of the TV.vcri ; fates, of other banks, ami of itulivititrals, arising in the same part of the country, from similar causes, the committee is of opinion, that the result does not shew in the Treasury Department any want either of fideli ty or prudence in the management of tnepublic funds. The other division of the charge contained,in the address, relates to the alledged suppression, or withhold ing of papers called for by different resolutions of the Houses of Congress* One specification under this head is that relating' to the correspondence between the Secretary and Mr. Ste. phensnn, the President of the Ed* wardsville Bank. The opinion of the committee on that subject has been already given, and need not be re peated. Another relates to the correspond cnee with the s-’V: r. W banks, gene rally The charge is, that material parts of it were retained, when all was called for by the House. The first call was made on the 9th of January, 1«22, and was, as the committee tliinir. limited in its proper construction to a requisition for the correspondence relative to the con tracts for making depositee. In this way, the Secretary says, he under stood it but that he did, nevertheless transmit letters not directly embraced by the resolution, but which, lie , thought, were necessary to elucidate the subject. The nest resolution was on the 12th of arch in the same year; and the only correspondence it called for.was that with tne Missouri Bank, and ■ there is no reason to believe that this was not substantially complie with* A third call was'made in the same year, on the 8th of May, requiring the correspondence with all tne banks that had not before be communica ted. The committee have not been able to discover, in the last very volumin ous return to this last resolution any material letters not before coinmuni cated, e cept a circular instruction to the western Banks, directing them to note, on the back o each return of the Treasurer’s account, a descrip tion of the moneys credited in such return, and the amount of each ac cording o a form of return therein given*. This form is the same with that in which the return referred to in Mr. Edwards’s address, marked E, is made out This.circuniBtanee would seem-to give a greater weight to the evidences to bedrawn from that paper considering it as an official document intended tor the treasury, undo the agreement. Another charge of suppression, in cidentally made, but which the com mittee deem it proper to notice,relates to a report made by the Secretary, in obedience to a resolution of the House of the 31st December. 1«19, calling { for such information as he possessed - in relation to the introduction of i and twenty thousand dollars from the other, r those hanks, appears tohttve acted ac cording to iVhat he supposed to Mb the rights ofihe parties, nod with a proper re gard to tilt interest ol the United Stales, •inder the citcotmtanccs which then cxis ted. Third. 1 That no ialcntiarur misstate went has been mode to the House-, of the ataount of uncut-rent bills received from the banks; although a sum of two hundred and eighty dollars of such bills was omitted •liWugh tnUtuke. Fourth. That, although the Sccrc ary may have misconstrued the effect of some if the cotitrarts with the banks to ihe extent before mentioned, the committee find no grounds for tho charge that he has misre presented them, inasmuch as the-contracts •hemselvcs were submitted, with the re port, to ths Hotise. Fifth. That the Secretary did omit to communicate to Congress the reasons which led him lo direct the depositc of public mo neys in the three local banks of Uhillicothc, Cincinnati, and I> utisviilo, where the Bank of the United States had branches, but there is no reason for supposing that any concealment was intended, or that the om iasion wes occasioned by design. Sixth* That, in some instances papers called for by resolutions of the House have not be. n communicated with other papers sent in aiiswer to such calls, but that these omissions have happened either fromacci dent, or from a belief (hat the papers so o mitted Wore immaterial or not called for : and that there is no evidence that any doc- u > ent or information has been withheld from improper motives Having already exrcssed the opinion that his investigation ought not to be tormina ted, until the person preferring tho char ges shall have been examined, and regret ug the circumstances which render such n examination impracticable during the present session of Congress, and thinking i at Mr Edwards may be expected at Washington, within a lew days, the com utcc fuel it their duty to recommend to - e House that they be required to sit nfier ■»e adjournment, for the- purpose of taking ■T« examination, if an opportunity shall be presented. [Here follows documents respecting denot es f money in the western bntikr.and Mr. Edwards’ ■ • iblicntion, made at the time of his withdrawal i-om the b*„k of Edwar;lsvi!Ic, the substance ol which have already bepn published.] / E. TueaIjukt Department, 20/A March 1824 The Secretly ol the Treasury has had tho honor to receive the letter addressed to him, on ihe 12th insl by tho Hon. Mr. Livingston, on behalf of a select Commit cc of the House of Representatives. \a-the correspondence with Mr. D. B. VthclKil, to which the Committee refers, .ough relating partly to public transac tions, was unofficial; it was not placed on ecord In trie Treasury Department. And on examination, it appears that only two of tne iectleis included in it have b^en pre •erved These are Mr Mitchell’s letters I the 19’.li of February, and 28th of April 818; the former of wnich lias been found n the files ol the Department, and the lat- slaves into the United States. On Iter among the private papers of the Se this point, the committee add eased ‘ -ertary. They are both transmuted here- an inquiry to the Secretary, and re-! with. ceiveu frofn.him the answer annexed T>> explain the circumstance of public to this report, marked E> Although they m ot upimofi that there were papers in tt.-c Department cont-unuig ' information cull'd .for by the refutation, and which ought to have been communi cm. -., yet, Judging f-otrt the statement male by the Secretary, in hisinswe , c. n- m eted with the fact, that the paper* in question were c .-•vmur.ci.t «l to the Attor- nev Gt-nmal, it is the opinion of the com mitter t in *he omission was not caused by.a U -sign to screen the person implica ted from punishment or blame. As to the other esses in which the Sec retary is oharged in the add.ess, wit > hav ing suppressed or withheld papers or in formation call: d f< r by the Houses of Con- K s, the committ -e is of opinion, that, al ough papers c» ning within the scope of the resolutions, or call, were not, in some instances, rommunioued, such omissions were et her the result of accident, or of a belief on the part of the 9ecr< tars, or of the persons nec-sBarily employed bv him on such occasions, that the papers so omit ted were not called fir , or were not mate rial i and the committee have seen no evi dence that any documents or information has been withheld fro n the House, from the operation of any improper motive or design. Referring to what has been said in thfc introduction to this report, and repeating that Mr Edwards has not bad ah opportunity of supporting his chatges by his presence and testimo ny, ihe result bl the fiats which have appeared to the committee, thus lur, in this investigation; and of' their de ductions from them, when applied to the recapitulation ol charges,as stated at the end ol the address, is: First, That the evidence referred to and examined, does not support the charge of having mismanaged the public funds. Second. That the uncurrent notes; mentioned in the second charge, ap pear, by ^evidence satisfactory to the committee, to have been received and deposited by the Public Receivers, at a time when they were recivable der the resolution of Con gross of 1816. That, in the principal case, that of Missouri, the bank did not make itsd ^responsible for such notes as cash, and, the-efore, the Secretary was bound to receive them from the bank : that, although the banks olTombeckbe and Ed wardsville were liable to account for such deposites as cash,if the construe lion which the committee gives to. their contracts be correct, yet, that both the Secretary and the banks ex pressed a different opinion as to the meaning of those contracts, and that the Secretary, in receiving fif men thousand dollars from (he one, natters being introduced into an unofficial corrc*pondcoce between two public officers, it is’prnper to stale that Mr Mitchell, hav ng been Governor of Georgia, and having for many years taken an active part in the public affairs of that state, had long been personally well known to the Secretary; and that during the Secretary’s residence at Washington, though his own duties left him but hi ie leisure for private correspon dettee, Mi Mitchell had been in the habit ol wri'ing to him freely and frequently ; in* inducing into his letters, as may naturally he supposed from the former and actual sit uation of the parties, a variety of topics, both of a public and local character. It is. also, to be ohserved, that, although Mr. Mitchell, us Indian Agent, was not preclu ed from any official correspondence with the Secretary of the Treasury, yet, as it was the War Department to which, under me President, he was officially accountable, it was to that Department that hts commu nicauons, in relation to his public duties, were properly to he addressed. And it ap pears by a a publication, which has since been made by Mr VliicheU, that, on the 3d and 18th of February, 1818, he commum cated ifificially to the Secretary of War, the saute information!), in substance, res pccting his conduct in relation to the Afri cans, us was contained in his private letter of the I9ih of February, to the Secretary of the Treasury. An examination of Mr Mitchell’s letters, of the 19th of February and 28th of April, will shew 'hat they were not merely unof fici.d. but, in part, at least, private and c ufidehtial Tho letter of the 25th of December, 1817*, wnich is the only other letter of Mr Mitchell requited by the com mittee, is believed to have been of the same character; but, in what degree, is not now recollected. Although it was no part of the duty of Secretary of the Treasury to have taken of facial cognizance of the subject of Mi. Mitchell's letter, of the twenty-fifth of December, even if the letter had been offv cial, yet he submitted it to the Ptesidcm and as the circumstances communicated in it appeared to show a delect in the existing I-tws on the subject, he submitted it, also, lo a Committee of the Senate which had been appointed to inquire into the expedi ency of making further provisions by law for preventing the introduction of slaves Whether the letter was returned to the Secretary by that committee, or what dis position was finally made of it, he is now unable tn state, lie has written, however, to Mr Roberts, who was Chairman of that committee, for-such information as he can furnish; and when the answer it received it shall be communicated to tho Commit? tec. Thq additional r.irrnmstnnccs disclosed in Mi* MncficlP* letter of thp I9 h >.f Ft", induced the Secretary to submit it,, to the \ttorney General; and while it was* before him, tho letter of the Collector of Dario'.', of the Sth-of Marclv Ittk8, containing hi*, official report of the seizure of the Africans <vas received, and was also submitted to the •Attorney General, As the Opinion of tin Attorn -y General recommended that the cose should be.left to ihe decision of the Courts, before which it was then supposed to be pending, the Secretary informed Mr. Mitchell of the fact; presuming that, as far as the Secretary was concerned, the affair was then terminated: as, indeed, it soon al- tai* was, by the delivery of the Africans to the executive authority of Georgia. As this letter was written in answer to unoffi cial letters, and, probably, contained ally sions to some of the private matters notic cd in those letters, ^ was riot made official: and, conscquently v .yvas not placed on thc're- cords qf the Treasury Department. C> pics of unofficial letters are rarely retained by the Secretary!"and, of this letter, none was taken. The opinion of the Attorney General, however, was filed in the Department: and, it appears, that with it were filed the pa pers upon which the opinion was founded, viz Mr Mitchell’s letter of the l9.hofFeb. and the letter of the Cullrptor of Darien of the 9th of March. Thorc is reason to believe that it was owing to the circumstance of these papers having been filed with the opinion of the Attorney General, that the letter ot the Collect r ol Darien was overlooked when the papers were collected to be transmitted under the resolutionof the H. of R. of tho 31st of December, 1819 It will be seen by the endorsements made on the original resolution | which is herewith transmitted by the Secretary and Mr Jones, the Cltiel Clerk of the D-purtmcnt, that the duly of collecting the papers called lor by the reso lotion was assigned by the Secretary to the Chief Clerk, and was performed by him. And, by the interlineation in his hand wri ing , in the original rough draft of the Se cretsry's report, under that resolution [which is herewith transmitted'] it will be seen that the report passed through his hands from the Secretary to the House.— From the lapse of time, that gentleman Is not now able to explain why the Collector’s letter, of the 9th ol March, was not trans mitted with the other letters! but the prob ability is, that; in collecting the papers re S uircd, his examination was confined to the ies of tho several Collectors and officers of tho customs, without recollecting that this letter of the Collector, and Mr Mitch ell’s letter ofthe 19th of February had been put up with the Attorney General’s opin ion, and placed with it on the file set apart for that ofli er’s communications. The o rigiuals, ol tho opinion and of those papers, with the endorsements made on them at the time, arc now transmitted in the same slat as that in winch they were filed: and, it i believed, that their appearance affords in vrinsic evidence that they were so filed. The papers transmitted, include all the correspondence in the possession of the Secretary, or in the Treasury Department, having relation to the subject of the letters required by the committee, not heretofore communicated to tho H, of Representatives It has been insinuated by Mr Edwards, that these letters were wi hheld by the Sec retaty, in violation of the resolution of the Hotise of Representatives of the 31st Dec. 1819, for the purpose of screening Mr. Mitchell. The charge,’however, t3 contra dieted by the facts; end particularly by the facts upon which it purports t« be founded trie letter of the Collector of Darien, ofthe 14th of March; tvhcch was communicated under that resolution, and to which, as welt as the other papers, communicated by the Secretary on the 1 lih ot January, 1820, the committee is respectfully referred, begins thus: “ I had the honor to address you pe: Iasi mail, and to enclose to you papers re- speciingf'rty-seven African negroes, taken Hy the surveyor of Darien,from oneJaredE Groce,on their way to the Alabama!’ erritu ry,through the Indian nation, and forty one others at the Creek agency, from the negro houses of the agent for Indian Afftirs.” Here then, is a disclosure of the very fact, which, if theSecretary’s design was to screen Mr Michell, it was fatal to disclose, viz: Mat a large number of Africans, who had been illicitly introduced, had been seized, net only at MrMitchell’s residence, and at the scat of his authority, but in his own ne gro houses. It will be seen by the comit- teo, that the collector’s iett-r of the 9th though it contains the detail of the seizure, does not more starngely implicate Mr. M than he is implicated by this disclosure. But lector inculpate Mr Mitchell, so, hh the other hand his t<vlh letters jus'ifv nim: ipt though one letter of the Collector., was mitted to be communicated to the House; yet, on the other hand, all the lettets r«f Mr Mitchell were omitted So that, as tar as Mr Mitchell was concerned, the charge was presented without the justification. It is believed, that, while the ctrsumstan- ces stated in this communication explain satisfactorily the reasons why the corn-sport dence referred to by the committee, was 3TO1 -- yKwwvUH POUT OF SAVANNAH. jyo arrivals dure *nr last. , Passenger* in th* »Mp Georgia; sailed yester?.. for Liverpool—Mr Hubert fatu.c and'fnni'v, fci Miller, Messrs Higginbotham Ami Maguire ' Passengers in the ship Ktebecos ti.T I*rirpwi-,,-, suited yesterday—Mrs OlrnMctnl aird cliiid, Mr* Ahern and child, Miss Aboru, Mrs f.ippit; ar,d two children, Master LipP'U, Messrs Kmoyiuxi and one-in t • j stect.igc. not laid before the House, under the reso-j, The Africa, Johnson, and Oglatliorht*, Jiyne, 19 it u From Bswnfiah, hud arrived at Liverpool previous ' In llit. l7ll> A I *1*1. ^ V ,1... t i lution ofthe 31st December, 18 demonstrated by the communications made hy the secretary to the President, to the committee of the Senate, to tho Attorney General, and to the House itself, that there has boen no wish nor. intention on the part of the Secretary, to wiiltiudd from the pro per authorities any itifotmution, whether made known to himbfliciatly^r unofficially of the violation of the law, in the case allu ded to or of Mr Mitchell’s conduct in the transaction. .(fcftu i SATuUttAV BVKNIt NINU, JUNK 5. 1824. to the 17th April. The Lady GuliitU:-, ,-rived there on the 18'h. Annm n mow tips vdiit. At Charleston on Wednesday, tchr T.’try, fi!,i - verick, 1 day; sloop Marls, Porqiiet, 14 hours, csramn foii this r»i:T, At Providence 24th ult. schr Decauir, taunprel!* The Letttr Bag of the ship FLORIDA, tor Uiyrbooi, will be taken from ti,e Counting Hoorn of,Waft GASTON, THIS EVKN- ING si 7 o’clock june 5 133 . Tsssr On By J B. fivrheH Co VilNtV.Y, 7tk inn. at 11 ‘vioc.lt, wha’ever may be the purport and. bearing >f the letter of the 9ih, that letter is partic ularly pointed to in the letter of 14th, as containing papers respecting the seizure of those negroes. And if there had been a to suppress the letter of the 9th, it was necessiry to its success that this reference design to a letter which would have defeat ed the design,should alsahave been sttppres sed. But, tipun what principles that govern human conduct, can the design of favoring Mr Michell, at the expense even of honor •mci of duty, be reconciled with the suppres. sion of papers that tended to his justifies lion? For it will be seen by the committee, that Mr Michcll’s letters, which the Sec retary has been charged with concealing and withholding, represent his conduct in the transaction referred to as that or a «igi lant, intelligent, and faithful public officer And, it is believed that if the gOiltor inno ceiice of Mr Mitchell were to be determin ed on no other grounds that those afforded by the communications made to the Secre tary by the Collector of Darien and himsell, all of which [with the exception of the let ter of the 25th of Dec.’] are now before the committee, Mr Mitchell would be free from suspicion So far, then, from having been •mptoperly influenced by any sentiment-ot partiality towards Mr Michell, in withhold nig these papers, it is believed that if any error h.as been committed by tfic Secretary in relation,.to them, it is on tho other sid If, on the one hand, the letters ofthe C y ■■ :• ' ' |C7* The Savannah Repubmcah will cease to be published daily from this tithe till October next. The days of publics tion will be Tuesday, Thursday and Samp* day. FULTON Nos. 8,9 and 10, are received and shall fie attended to next week. THR IIEPOHT. We publish to day, and at large, the report of the committee of investigation, to whom wa* re ferred the address of Ninian Ruwiirds: we ark fur it an attentive perusal from our reader*. The conclusions of the report ol the committee arc terfectl/ satisfactory to Mr. Crawford and his Viends. As it relates to the Secretary of tin* Treasury, he stands before hi, fellow citizen* a* gold which has thrice passed through the crucible and come out pure. The whole transaction must iear, as to BdwArds and bia coadjutors, in the ligrit of the most atrocious plot, to ruin the go >d name of an emineht citizen, that ever atained the annals of our country or disgrace the American charuoter. The House of Representatives have decided that the committee of investigation may sit during the recess of Congress. To tins Course there ought to be no objection. We hope and trust that F,dwnrds may go to Washington and explain himself if he can. We shall be glad to hear of his arrival. The committee of investigation who intend remaining at the teat of government until the minister arrives, are Messrs Floyd, Webster, Livingston, Taylor, and McArthur. THE “FLYING MINISTER" HEARD OF. Lieut. Chase, of the U, S. corps of engineers, who has arrived at Washington irom New Orleans which place he left on the Bill ult states that Nin ian Edwards arrived there on the 6ih of May. CONGRESS —In the Senate on the 25th nit forty seven bills which hsd been received from tbe H of R. and been read twice, were read the third time and passed In the House of Representatives, the resolution with which the report of the committee on the memorial of Mr. Edwards concludes, was taken up, ayes 83, noes 26, and agreed to with amend ment* which require the report of the committee which is to sit during the recsess, to be published [This promulgation of the duties of the commit toe, (s-iys the Nat. Int V,was recommended and tjreed Jo, apparently, without distinction of per so :al feelings towards the accuser or the accused in the wise. It was the result of an impression,on the one hand, thnt, as Mr Edwards has been sent for, it is due to consistency, that he should, on bis arrival here, be heard by the committee ot the Hotise, as the house cannot itself, with any conve nience, remain in Session to await his coming t and, on tbe other, that no room ought to be left, to the worst enemy of the Secretary of the Trea sury, if he have any, for siying that a report had beem made favorable-o Mr. Crawford, without af fording his accuser an opportunity in person to sustain his charges.] The evening sitting of the two House* conlinu ed to a late hour, and several bills were passed, a.n account of which will be given hereafter. Among them wa* the bill to amend the Naturalization laws ofthe United States. lathe House on the 27th ult. a motion w»s made to add two new members to the committee of Investigation, tu supply -he place of two who were absent; but the motion could not be acted upon in consequence of their not being a quorum ofthe House present. While this resolution was pending an interesting conversation took place on the subject of an expression in Mr. Randolph’s Utter to bis constituents, which we shall take an opportunity to lay before our readers at length — A committee was then appointed to wait on the President and a message v/is sent to the senate to inform them that that House was ready to adjourn, an. I an answer having been received from the President, the House was adjourned by the Spea- tier till the first Monday of December next. Latest from Europe, By the arrival at Charleston of the Br. ship Corsair, Capt. Petris, in 44 days from Liverpool, London papers to the evening of the 16th April, Liverpool to the 17th inclusive, have been re ceived. Will be told at the Store Intelu occtipi.-d litf Uenrt. )Crime U. JS tvcomb, 1'aylor s wharf, .. The' remaining Stock, consisting of t general assortment of Groceries, Store Fixtures^ fife. , / Among which 12 Demijohns Superior Maderla Wine 80 caiks Patent Nails, a sorted *ie a 15 barrel* Prime Pork Le»f Tobacco, Sugars, if a Ac. By older of the Assignee, june 4 132 Termtcasb. ON MONDAY, 14th insl at 11 o’clock, Will he sold at th.- store formerly occupied by Pouyat & Holland, ne w the Exchange, The ontir- Stock -f Drugs and Medicines, Compo n^ * general-tint wtiujbir assortment. -47,-SO, A Soda Fount, Complete, The x-iie will be pot itiv<> june 5 133 Terms ensh. Sheriff's Sales. On the fiv.t fuc nay in July next, W ILL he sold at the Court Knu*e on the i«t Tuesday in July next, oelwcc-i the hours of 10 and 4 o’clock. All thi-t lot and buildings N- 24 in th4 city of Savannah, under a fi fa on foreclosure in favor of M.iry 1-ewdeh against Paul J Vsl’aton, I D’LYON, a o c. june 5 33 Sheriffs Sales. On the fir»t Tuesday in July next, IFY&ILL be sold at the Court House in Riccho- W rough, Liberty County between the u*uul hours ol 10 and 3 o’clock the following prop .ny, viz: Four negroes, Sampson, Sophia, Deity and her child, Caroline, levied on a* the property ot the estate of Haj. John Wion, to satisfy an execution in favor of Uriah Wilcox and one in favor of Joseph S Raker. B. WAY, sac. june 9 133 Sheriff's Sales, On the first Tuesday in August next, W ILL be sold at the court house between the hour* of 10 *n 4 o’clock, All that southern had part of Lot tin 6, Uelilha Tytbing, llesthcute ward with the improvem^nta thereon, bounded north by a lane, east by an ad jacent lot, south by South >r>ad St. and west by Barnard St leWecl on under a foreclo«ur» of a mortgage from George L. Cope, to Wm Whit*. Held. | D’LYON,see. june J 133 W 1 iSheriff’s iales. On the first Tuesday in July idxt, , ILL be sold at the Uoutt House, in Effing ham County between the usual hours. Eighty acres of land in Effingham county boun ded S by land of Shultz, B by land of Metzger, W b- land of McIntosh, l'-vi, d on as the property of Matthew Reiser, to satisfy an execution in favor of John Be^ry. , Also, one negro man named Jacob, levied on aZ the property of Benjamin Morel, to satisfy an exe cution in favor of Handford Knapp Also, 600 acres ofland joining lohrls of Waldia Griffin and on Gowpen Branch, in Kffingh»>it County, levied on as the prop-wty of Jno G I'yner security for Tbos Gi I, to satisfy an execution in f-tvor of James Wilson—returned to me by aeon- stable. THOS. ELKINS,». z c. june 5 133 She iff’s Sales. On the firrt Tuesday m Jultf next, W ILL be sold ut the Court H >use, between the hours of 10 and 4 o’clock, A negro woman named Dianna and her two children Lewis and Sam, levied on by a. con- able to satisfy several executions from a magistr-t -s* t ourt in favor of John B. Wick, and Bhe iezer Jenckcs, again-t Adam Anderson, by hi* gu irdian and turned over to me. I. D’LYON, see. june 5 133 V Mr. Brown, our minister to France presented his credentials to the French King the 13th April The British parliament adjourned on the 15th April, till the 23d May. All accounts from Spain concur in represent .ng that country to be a complete scene of anar chy—murders, and robberies were heard o daily The cause ofthe Greek* continues to prosper— Accounts from Corfii of the 18th March, notice the espture of Arts by the Greek General Bozza- riu*. The fortress of Coron is also ssld 'to have fallen into their hands. ' Preparations were-m iking hy the Turks to open the campaign with an artny of 100,000 men, and a large fleet. „ . “LIVERPOOL. April 17. “During the last'two day*, the demand for cot ton has considerably improved,and the trade have purchased freelv, assisted also by speculators, who have taken 1500 bags uplands off the markeqfair to good qualities. h*ve been ippst, in_ demand, and in some instances f ) advance has been obtained on our last quotations. Sea Islands of low qitali. ties support their price, and are moat in req t-st, but good to fine cottons are difficult of sale, 22,140 sags were sold in the last two we:-ks, and the im- ourts for the same amount to 21,179 bags. “Rice continues to meet with a very dull sale, good \ofinp new Carolina h.is been sqldat 17 a 17 6d. ,The arrivals of.Titcpei>Vi oe h * ve bcen ery considerable; 2000 bushels, l-3ds soft, were 'his week brought to the hammer, of which 200 „>ld at 13* 6:1 a 13»9Jt for. tbe remainder 13s wus offered but refused. Tbe trade hold Ir-rge stockB md shew no disposition to increase them. There is not much doing ia I’ar-HW sates in djmericao. City Sheriff’s? Sales. • On first Tuesday in July next',' W ILL be sold beftir. the Court llouso in tho city of Savannah, between "fllB’usual hours of’’0 and 4 o’clock, All that lot of land known: in the plan of the ci ty of Savannah, as lot No 25 twenty five Brown ward, containing60 feet in front and 90*feet de.ep subject to an annual groundrent to the corppni-- lion of the city of Savannah, together with the buildings thereon, bounded east by lot No 24 twenty four, south by Ilall St. west by Jot No 26 twenty sixand north by a lane, levied’on as the property .of Charles H Hayden, to satisfy xe :u- ti >ns from the court of Common Pleas lnd Oyer <nd Terminer forthe city of Savannah', J <hn p. Williamson vs. Charles II Hayden, Moore <st Ly* man vs. same, and Charles W Ruck w-|[-vs s. in;, and an execution for rent, John B Berthelutt va. *ttme. . • : Also, sundry articles of furniture, consisting of two mahogany Sophas, one dozen st&w bottomed chairs, one pair mahogany card tables; four ma hogany. tea tables, one beodsteSd undone *ide" board, levied on as the property of Gear lie S ow,' to satisfy an execution tmm the court of Common i Pleas and Oyer & Terminer forthe city of Savan nah, Douglass Si Sorrel vs. George Stow. Also, one Horse and Gljf, levied on ‘.lie pro. petty of Wm. Joor, to Htttijfy two exeettflons frotu the Court of Common Pleas nd Oyer Q I'ermin - er for the city of Sa.vttnqtth, Charles VV4lockwe!l vs. Wirt. loor and Geo, IV Coe ys, samcV Also, all those two lots of luttd, knu^n in thd plan of the city Of Savannah, as lots Nos 17 arid 18, old Franklin Ward sub-ect to a ground rent to the corporation of the city of Savannah, bounded east.by Jefferspn atveet, west by Montgomery at,, north by Bryan'street anti voutij by Si Julian sV- levied oti a* tbe property of F. S te.l, to s ti-fy sundry executions’ from the Ooun of- Common Pleas aniQyer and Terminer for the gity -d' Sa vannah, JnoCfahe and N.B -ker, va, FS Full i Whitjock vs. Same andJas Weds vs -.ame. juneS >33 A f fD’J^N,cs.