Newspaper Page Text
MORE VARIETY
nuTABHrn «t lower Prices
fl H f ill to el
taw SIRLOIN<£B9*
RBJS2SJS . LB -.89« j/r WHOLE FRESH
t-bone f EDVEDC >
BOSTON BUTT 7W Z 49'f FK "J2 1
Tenderay ® Round, Rump, Sirloin Tip, Heel-O-Round —— W CUT UP n c B
Som&m BEEF ROAST “ 95 1 -29 c■> ®R f
FRYER An FRYER — wk I R JISf —I ■ JS?
BREAST - 49' LEGS -47 % /
When you look for Frying Chickens at Kroger,
1)| E88888ftlfr' < . y° u find freshness . . . and savings. Fresh,
Flump and tender and so reasonable.
CARDINAL TENDERAY® EAV
SLICED BOSTON ROLL WHOLE FA I
_~ _ SMOKED
BACON BAkCR FRYER BREAST FRYER LEG
— rIUNIto QUARTERS .’.35* QUARTERS... _...£31«
4RA >. oM jiffy breaded
Ib WU LB r>M QQt lb. raU perch fi11et........ b .39* veal cut1et....?..”.89«
H Jn REDFERN CHOPPED
W W B W > ■ W BOLOGNA «“49* SIRLOIN. ~..5 . .”.29*
REDFERN Chitteding - 2 lb. 69c
KROGER FROZEhn-TlwßaolThlnflfrarn Florida — *JL 6OZ Bre*
ORANGE JUICE O /3
EARLY JUNE PEAS 4-" $ l
__ r COFFEE %
CLOROX BLEACH &L 29* g ONE LB. VAC PAC
WABOMVAEC E N - 303 0®* i ■
TOMATOES 5 cans 8V 1 ■■ ■
DOG FOOD 15'^ s l \Jiy OjEf
MARGARINE 4 69’
RIGHT GIIARD-Rph tl Si™ ‘ LIMIT 2 WITH $5.00 PURCHASE OR MORE. . ■
DEODORANT ° 59 jj .
A 13OZ. CWw CHICKEN OF THE SEA LIGHT HOME PRIDE
**WWEL FWM kAIVC W7 CHUNK TUNA 3 , 2s 9) FABRIC SOFTNER.?. 49<
MODESS REGULAR TOOTHPASTE-Reg. 95c Size
CANITADV MAPKIMC 12CT - PI EE 11 6% oz. alo? detergent kroger chili with
NS ? “ x Xj? ® 9 COLD P0WER...... :.67 < BEANS....
SCOn TOWELS.—3^ 9S’ HEAD & SHOULDERS.....’.”.?!’ 4
VAUIVA flllFP KROGER SKIM KROGER
IPJATOSAUa —4 49< AWAKE.... .’..?f.39* MILKSItIO* PRUNE JU1CE......5L39*
COOKING OIL .'“”.B9* STRAWBERRY HALVES 3 &79*
FLOOR FINISH . P L.I9« KROGER TEA
KROGER FRESH MAINE I <nfttatw
FROM FLORIDA RUSSET IN HUSK ~ AB* *
ORANGE JUICE POTATOES SWEETCORN & >
3«1 10 59 g. 59 [*» “*««>“" 1
GREEN SALAD red juicy ® * H W
CABBAGE TOMATOES STRAWBERRIES B "> U! ■
2 29* 3'69*
abw WIU IWB COV9ON m WITH 7WISOOM9OW . _.¥■ *LHL n
T"* FVNVMASS OFNI tnb M M AN* YU FVBCN4M 99 ■ T * B rUBCNIIB 99 ■
■ One 4 oz. KROGER n Two innve«9n#>» ** ■■ 3—LBS OR MORE •• rM iadtcd ci m■■ ANY TWO n ■ Anv Baa GRASS SEED ■
• VANILLA EXTRACT ■ . buttercrust bread Z ■ chuck!ground W!!d •• Q PORK LOIN •• ROSE BUSHES ■■ or W,LO BIRD SEEO ■
■ C APRIL N B EX I I 967 S ■ COUPON EXPIRES /*—\" COUPON* EXPIRES L< COUPON EXPIRES • C ?of° N O EXP J”^ S f'u'X* C ?o^? N « EX 19A7 S / < 7 > \
■■■• •• ■ ■ APR,L 8 ' 1967 (V) - APRIL 8, 1967
KROGER SHOPPERS GET
Wednesday, April S, 1967
Griffin Daily News
Commentary
Filipinos
Shrug Off
Huks Threat
By DON C. BECKER
United Press International
MANILA (UPI) —Despite
rumblings from the sugar and
rice lands of poverty-ridden
central Luzon, most Filipinos
still shrug off the threat of the
Communist Huks movement.
The Huks—short for “Hukba
lahap," meaning People’s Liber
ation Army—have been regard
ed as something of a sick joke
in some circles since being
crushed in the 1950’s by the late
President Ramon Magsaysay.
“It must be budget time
again,” Manila columnists inevi
tably cracked following Huk
"incidents,” the implication
being the Communist threat
was overblown to justify the
defense budget to congress.
Lately, the situation has
sobered up some of the jesters.
The Huks have reliably been
reported gaining strength.
150 Strong
The full tike Huk guerrilla
force is only about 150, virtually
all of them tough, hard core
killers they operate under
“Commander Sumulong,” who
has risen to the top as a result
of the capture or surrender of
his predecessors.
Sumulong is a shadowy figure
and there is little Castro-type
romanticism about him.
Yet the Huks, by associating
themselves with the problems of
the rural masses and terroriz
ing public officials, many of
them corrupt, have been
winning an increasing number
of sympathizers.
Reports that the Huks already
control “in varying degrees”
some 500,000 people and 1,400
square miles in central Luzon,
the main Philippines island, are
considered somewhat mislead
ing by intelligence sources.
Lighter Side
He Liked
Old Model
Typewriter
By DICK WEST
United Press International
WASHINGTON (UPl)—This
year we are observing the 100th
anniversary of tile invention of
the first practical typewriter.
Observing but not necessarily
celebrating.
The centennial should be an
occasion for unrestrained rejoic
ing among penmanship drop
outs, parties in need of aid,
quick brown foxes, and count
less others who have benefitted
from the writing machine.
Yet for many of us the
commemoration is marred by
what we regard as a disturbing
trend in the typewriter industry.
More, as they say in television,
about that in a moment. First,
a word from your historian.
Inventors have been tinkering
around the idea of typewriting
for more than 250 years. The
first patent was issued in 1714
to one Henry Mill of England,
but nothing came of it. And
small wonder.
Typographical Terror
Mill called his invention “an
artificial machine or method for
impressing or transcribing of
letters singly or progressively
one alter another, as in writing,
whereby all writing whatever
may be engrossed in paper or
parchment so neat and exact as
not to be distinguished from,
print.”
A description like that would
impede the progress of almost
anything.
It was about a century later
before inventors recovered en
ough from Mill’s definition to
get close to a practical
typewriter. The trick finally
was turned in 1867 by Christo
pher Latham Sholes of Milwauk
ee.
Sholes not only licked the
problem of jamming; it was he
who composed the immortal
line “Now is the time for all
good men to come to the aid of
their party.” This has done
more for typewriting than any
other single development, in
cluding the lazy dog’s back.
Good Old Ways
I have at home an old
Underwood (circa 1935) which
for my money (circa $32.50)
represents the high point in
typewriter development.
Since then, in my opinion,
typewriters have been going
steadily downhill.
Manufacturers undoubtedly
will claim this is nostalgic
nonsense. They will insist that
typewriters have been getting
more efficient, durable and
functional.
If I were alone in my view, I
might be persuaded that I am
merely getting crotchety in my
old age. I find, however, that
most of my colleagues who play
the typewriter for a living share
my aversion to the newer
models.
In a subsequent dispatch, I
shall analyze the reasons for
our disenchantment. Don’t miss
it if you can.
19