The People's party paper. (Atlanta, Ga.) 1891-1898, September 30, 1892, Page 6, Image 6
6
THE TENTH DISTRICT.
[continued frcm third page.]
Mr. Black. Suppose that I admit
ihat the government lends money to
the whisky men at five per cent. That
is wrong, ain’t it?
Voices. Certainly it is wrong.
Mr. Black. Why of course it is
wrong. Well, I say this, that if there
is not a wrong of that kind on the
statute books that I will not go as far
as any man in the land to remove ;
but how do you propose to right it ?
You can do nothing until you have
control of the government. Now, sup
pose that you had the lower house,
and that Weaver was in the Presi
dential chair, what is the first thing
you propose to do ? To commit the
same wrong—the same iniquity that
you say has been committed in favor
of the whisky ring.
A voice. That is right: You
want to help the monopolists; we
will help ourselves.
Mr. Black. Now, if we want to do
right, let us do right, and not if we
get into power, enact bad laws be
cause somebody else has enacted,
when they had power, another bad
law.
Your platform says that you want
fifty dollars per capita, at least. You
do not say how much more. I asked
my friend before if he issued money
on the cotton product of the United
States, if he issued money on the
corn product, if he issued money on
the wheat product, if he issued
money to buy the railroads of the
country, if he issued money to re
claim the lands, how much the per
capita circulation would be to do all
this? Suppose a man came along
who was running a saw mill and
said, “1 want money on my lumber,”
and then a man who owned a mine
came along and said, “I want money
op my mine,’' would it not be just as
reasonable as for the man who
raised wheat, or corn, or cotton ?
Suppose that the laborer wanted
money on his muscle, or the manu
facturer on his manufactured pro
ducts, would that not be just as
reasonable as the other? Why, my
friends, in the first place, there is no
more likelihood of such a law as that
ever being put in force as there is of
you getting paid for your emanci-
Cated slaves, and if you had such a
kw it would bring the direst disas
ter to every industry—to the farmer
and the laborer as well as to the
merchant and the banker; to the
professional man and the mechanic,
all alike.
Now, my competitor may enter
tain you. He may make you laugh.
He may say many things, and doubt
less he will, that is pleasing. He
may indulge in his gifts of retort
and repartee; but come, let us reason
together. I call a halt on this mad
current of public opinion into which
the public has been lashed. I appeal
to their reason, to their intelligence
and better judgment; to think well;
to not put their feet in uncertain
ways; to feel their way ere they
start on a road the end of which is
not peace and prosperity, not justice
or happiness. It would flood our
country with a currency which
would inflict its greatest curse upon
the poor and the helpless laborer of
the country. That is the prescrip
tion that these wise, latter day phy
sicians prescribe for the sick body
politic. You say that here is an un
just law, here is iniquitous class leg
islation, and what remedy do you
propose? You say, “You infernal
scoundrels when you were in power
you went into an unholy alliance
with the whisky men and passed bad
laws, attd have arisen in our might
and cleansed the temple of these
devils—
[The speaker’s voice was drowned
amid a babel of approval and disap
proval of what was anticipated. The
concluding words could not be heard
by your reporter, and I doubt very
much whether the speaker heard
them.]
Mr. Black. Now, Ido not know
that it is necessary for me to say a
word about the sub-treasury bill.
The only reason I have heard ad
vanced in its favor is that the Gov
ernment has done things as bad.
Now, my friends, the only way to
remedy these evils after you have
cleansed the temple, is to repeal
these bad laws.
A voice. Put in the right men
and they will do it.
Mr. Watson. Boys, be quiet. My
time is coming directly. [Laughter.]
Mr. Black. Why, the sub-treas
ury is not fair even to the farmers of
the country. A man sits down here
in Georgia and says, “I will rai-e
cotton and I can borrow so much on
it, and the same is said by the man
that raises corn and wheat. Now
did you ever think of the proposi
tion ? It gives nothing to the man
that raises hay, and I am informed
that the hay crop of the United
States amounts to more than the cot
ton crop. Do you think that this
thing is right? Do you not know,
fellow-citizens, that that is unjust.
Do you not know that when you
start in to such a scheme that you
will have a Government that, instead
of helping one class you will have
succeeded in establishing a central
ized despotism ?
There are a great many other ob
jectionable features in this platform
which I have not time to take up in
detail. But it seems to me that the
people have allowed themselves to
be carried away with a perfect trans
port of passions, and prejudice, and
feeling, by the sub-treasury plan.
They seem to have forgotten that
there is another plank in this plat
form, and that is the plank about
the railroads. My competitor said
the other night in Augusta, I be-
I
PEOPLE’S PARTY PAPER, ATLANTA, GEORGIA, FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 30. 1892.
lieve, that that plank was put in
there, if not at the instance, in the
interest of the country.
Mr. Watson. No, I said that the
distinctive feature come down
through Knights of Labor and they
agreed to tight for those principles
irrespective of party. That one of
the planks which your party, and
yourself, so strongly condemn was
that the government should own and
operate the railroads.
Mr. Black. Well, my point is that
the financial plank of the sub-treas
ury plan was in the interest of the
man that had something, and against
the interest of the man who had
nothing. W here is the poor man
who has not a foot of land—not
even enough to bury his child—-
where are you going to raise the
cotton to borrow money on this sub
treasury plan? Why, it helps no
one but the man with the land. It
is not in the interest of the black
man; it is not in the interest for any
man. It is at w*ar with every in
terest, it is class legislation and
ought to be condemned by every
man. If you get into power the
first thing you propose to do is
something for which you have curs
ed the party already in power. I
say no. No party can pass a law
until it comes into power. You
have to get both houses of Congress,
and you have to get the Presidency,
before you can pass a single law.
Have you as good a chance to do
tnat as the Democratic party?
Voices. Yes, we have only to
vote right.
Mr. Black. My friend, you are
mistaken. You will never live to
see that day. Now listen. Let us
be practical. There is no use in
having impracticable theories. lam
assured that you want something
practical. Something that you can
use to benefit you. Well, will any
man tell you confidently, that he
expects to see your party get into
power at the next elections. Now
don’t you know that you have only
nine or ten members of Congress
out of 333, and do you expect to get
a majority? When do we expect
the Senate? Do not consult your
prejudices against rich men, against
city men, against right and justice.
Sit down and consult the reason
with which your Creator has en
dowed you. How is it possible if
you cannot have the faintest hope of
getting control of the government.
Now I do not believe in abandon
ing principle because you are in the
minority any more than my compe -
titor. I say that a man ought to
stand for principle, without compro
mising or swerving if he was the
only man in the world who was for
that principle. (Cheering and laugh
ing.) I say this, we ought not to
lose our senses.
Voices. We ain’t going to.
(Laughter.)
What is the use for us to try to
do something that is impracticable,
that is impossible,when there is a fair
chance to obtain, possibly not so
much, but a great deal ? *
Now listen. He talks about in
come tax, taxing the millionaire. I
am as much in favor of taxing the
millionaire as he is. (Laughter.) I
will go as far if honored with your
suffrages, as any just and fair man
will go. I will not be controlled by
any prejudice against the rich man,
I will tell you that.
A voice. We know that without
you telling us. (Renewed laugh
ter.)
Mr. Black. I would not do the
rich man an injustice any sooner
than I would do the poorest man in
your midst an injustice. I would do
all men justice alike. And no pub
lic clamor could swerve me from the
path of rectitude. No,not if it was as
loud and terrific as the thunder that
shook the base of Sinai or as vivid
as the lightning that played about
olympias sacred summit, would I be
moved to do injustice to any man,
rich or poor. But while I say that
I will say this also, that I will go as
far as any just man can go to im
pose upon the wealth of the country
its just and fair proportion of the
burdens of government. I admit
that there is no plank in our plat
form demanding an income tax. I
say what I said before, that I go on
the Georgia State platform, and that
I will go as far as I can to carry the
platform out. I say, too, that there
are more Democrats in the Congress
of the United states that will vote
for the income tax than there are
Third party men.
Voices. Oh, oh!
Mr. Black. I repeat it, and I
challenge successful contradiction.
A voice. That is because you
have so many more, but wait till af
ter November and then where will
your party be?
Mr. Black. Listen. There is no
more prospect of your party getting
in power than of taking wings and
flying. You want to know the party
that will serve you best, and that has
the best -opportunity to serve you.
That will bring you the most pros
perity. Here is one that is willing
to concede some of your demands,
and has some prospect of getting
into power. Here is another full of
promises, but mixed up with so
much that is impracticable that it
does not illuminate the sky of your
demands with the first ray of hope.
Now listen! I wish that I had
time to go into this State bank ques
tion. He says that Jefferson ap
proved the financial scheme of your
platform. From that proposition I
dissent. 1 have no’; time now to
take the work and read it,
but I have raad it. I have
put. as fair an interpretation
noon it as any moi could. But I
do say that the most distinterested
and best financial authority in the
United States to-day has put its
seal of approval upon that plank,
which recommends State banks. • He
says that the money will not be
good outside of Georgia. What is
the trouble with you now? The
money has been hoarded at the
north and east. Money has found
its center there and there it goes.
Do you colored men think, do you
toilers think, do you farmers think
that it would be something in your
interest if you had a currency that
did not have to circulate so far
away? Do not you think it would
be a good thing to have a currency
that would not go to the men who
are so covetous that they lay their
hands on everything within reach?
If the currency pays your tax and
grocery bills, what do you care
whether the men in these money
centers want it or not? It has done
it in the past. lam not a very old
man and I recollect, and I have no
doubt but there are many men who
recollect when the bank of Hamburg
South Carolina, had a credit from
one end of the world to the other.
I know that it was the same in my
own State of Kentucky.
Mr. Watson. Will you allow me
to ask you a question?
Mr. Black. Certainly.
Mr. Watson. Can a State make
it legal tender?
Mr. Black. No, sir, but a State
can throw proper safeguards around
it, like the government protects its
bonds. The State can protect it
and make it legal tender to all in
tents and purposes for buying your
clothing, groceries, boots shoes, etc.,
and what do you care whether a
man on the other side of the Ohio
river wants it or not?
Mr. Watson. What is your plan?
Mr. Black. Secure it by bonds—
by good municipal bonds deposited as
security—and it would furnish you
with a currency practically sound,
practically flexible, and it is a better
currency for all interests than a cur
rency secured by the agricultural
products of this great country that
would flood the country, as I said
elsewhere, with money as thick as
the leaves of autumn and about as
worthless. No man is more inter
ested in a sound, stable currency
than the farmer, the man who lives
by his toil. Why do you recollect
the Confederate times, when the
money was so thick that men had
baskets of it—cotton bags of it—
enough in some places, I suppose, to
roof their beds at night, but what
was it worth ? You must look to the
character of the money as well as to
the volume. And now when my
competitor comes in in his fifteen
minutes’ reply I want him to tell you
how much he proposes to issue on
the land, how much he proposes to
issue on |he railroads, how much he
proposes to issue on the telegraphs
and telephones, and how much upon
the land in the hands of aliens and
corporations. He has been putting
questions to me, and I respectfully
ask him to answer those. He says
in his book that he is going to issue
money to buy the railroads of the
country; he is going to issue notes
to buy the telegraphs and telephones.
Did he ever think what that scheme
would put on you ? Thousands of
Federal officers. Every railroad en
gineer, every railroad fireman, every
railroad train hand, every railroad
superintendent, in a word, every
railroad employe, from the highest to
the lowest. Did you ever think of
that, men, in your sober senses ?
Stop and think of this mad passion
that has come upon the people and
carried thera away from their moor
ings. Stop! in the name of your
wives
Time called.
The speaker took his seat amid
great applanse, and some handsome
flowers were forwarded to the stand
for him.
When Mr. Watson arose to reply
it was the signal for a fresh outburst
of applause, which lasted some
minutes, when he advanced and
spoke as follows:
MR. WATSON IN CONCLUSION.
Fellow-Citizens : I feel like
commencing this reply in the words
of the battle hymn of the Hu
guenots —
“ Now glory to the Lord of hosts,
From whom all glories are.”
If there ever was a time when
anybody doubted that we had got
them, they do not doubt it now.
(Applause.) If there ever was a
time when anybody doubted that
we could behave better they could,
they do not doubf it now. (Re
newed applause.) I never felt
prouder than I do now at the mag
nificent compliment you have paid
me by complying with my request
and treating Mr. Black with the re
spect in my home that I did not
receive in his. (Great applause.)
We have a platform in which
breathes the spirit of God’s justice,
and we can afford to practice that
line of conduct enjoined by the
Master of returning “good for evil.”
(Applause.)
He asked me how much money I
would be in favor of issuing from
the United States government,
backed by the power of forty-four
States. I tell him that every dollar
that is necessary to do the legitimate
business of the country, and to keep
the capitalists and moneyed kings
from robbing the laborer of his just
dues.
He talks of Confederate money.
What was Confederate money ex
cept a promise to pay, bearing irre
trievable disaster on its face, and
going down in the gulf of ruin ?
Suppose that he had State bank
notes at that time, what would have
become of them?
Cries of Now you have got him !
(Cheering.)
Mr. Watson. Now we have a na
tion of forty-four States with sixty
two millions of people and sixty-two
billions of wealth back of tbe money.
Will not this money be good as long
as the government is good? Will
not that money die as soon as the
government dies? (Cheering.)
He says you must not have the
sub-treasury because it wall help the
landlord and not the tenant; because
it would help the wheat raiser and
would not do anything for the hay
man.
Mr. Black. I did not say that, Mr.
Watson.
Mr. Watson. That is a legitimate
statement of your position. I did
not pretend to quote you literally.
Oh, my friends, I tell you they have
opened the bars.
Mr. Black. You are in conclusion.
Mr. Watson. He says, fellow-citi
zens, that I misunderstood him.
Well, now, I will, with great pleasure,
let him re-state his position.
Mr. Black. I did not say that I
opposed it because it would not help
the hay raiser. I said that it was a
piece of class legislation, and that it
did not lend money on hay, while it
did on cotton, corn and wheat.
Mr. Watson. Now, my friends,
you have heard his own argument
again. Don’t you think that objec
tion ought to come from a hay raiser,
and not from a Central railroad law
year? (Upronrous laughter and ap
pluuse.) He says that we must not
have money that the land owner can
borrow on his land and use to pay
the laborer with instead of orders.
We must not have a currency that
the cotton raiser can use to pay his
store bills. Why ? Because the hay
man can’t get some of it on his hay.
(Renewed laughter.) Why in the
name of God is he in favor of perpet
ating a system by which nobody gets
this benefit but the bondholders ?
A voice. Tell us about Weaver.
Mr. Watson. Oh, I know you
would like to get me off this question
but you can not do it.
One of my friends put it to Mr.
Black that the whisky men got favors
from the Government, and that the
Democratic party was not proposing
to tear that down. Mr. Black denies
that. I have got the law in my
hand and referred it to Mr. Black
and he said that he had read it. 1
say that the law reads, thit for the
first three years the private owner of
that whiskey builds his own ware
house and gets a loan of ninety cents
on every gallon of whisky at five per
cent.
(There was some confusion caused
by the moving of the Lincoln county
band wagon at this point, and 1
mb ,ed a few words of the conclu
sion!)
Why, in the name of God, can not
the people get money on the same
terms as the whisky men and na
tional bankers? He says the proper
thing to do is to repeal the laws that
the classes have. Does the Demo
cratic party, iu its platform, propose
to repeal either of these laws ?
Voices. No, no, no.
Mr. Watson. No; they make no
promise to repeal those obnoxious
laws; but they tell you to stand out
side the door while the feast is going
on. Yet you furnish the feast and
set the table, but you must not ask
for a mouthful of bread. He says
the Government will never grant
your demands. Who is the Govern
ment ?
Voices. That’s it, that’s it. (Cheer
ing.)
Mr. Watson. He tried to put you
colored people against me by saying
that this Brad well claim, although it
had been paid once, ought to be
heard again in preference to having
a bill reported by which, if enacted
into law, you would have some of
this money that the bondholders
have a monopoly of and then let you
have from eight to any per cent they
can squeeze out of you. The man
that has been paid once ought to be
heard in preference to sixty-two
millions of people.
The other night in Augusta, talk
ing to laboring men, he told them
that they ought not to go with us
because there was not a* plank in our
platform that would do them any
good. All for the farmer.
Voices. He said it. He said it.
I heard him. I heard him. (Great
applause.)
Mr. Watson. Now to-day, in the
country, talking to you farmers, he
says there is nothing in it to benefit
you. (Laughter and applause.)
Fellow citizens, he says that there
never was a time when we had mote
money in circulation than to-day.
Look back to 1856 when we had
eight hundred million in circulation
of paper money. He says you shall
not take medicine out of our spoon
because he objects to the doctor.
The body politic is suffering and he
sits at the door and says, suffer on.
The rich manufacturers object; tbe
railroad monopolists object; Wall
street objects. My friends, no good
woman can call down God’s blessing
upon the Democratic platform any
more than she can pray for God’s
blessing on that vote for whisky m
Augusta. No good man or no good
woman can call down God’s blessing
upon this campaign, that is borne
through this district with a bar-room
attachment on every train. No good
man or .woman, or a law abiding
citizen, can approve of the open
violation ofJJthd laws of Columbia
county, of McDrffie. Where is Boy
kin Wright, the Solicitor General?
I call upon him here, before his con
stituents, to prpsecute these violators
of law. (Great' commotion and ap
plause.) Give I hem free whisky and
the Black flagj Give me pure pol
itics and the?’ white lilies that the
women tw : ne on their pure white
brows.
We will go forward growing
stronger every day ; growing juster
in our demands every day ; growing
firmer in our convictions every day ;
and knowing that we can fall upon
our knees and ask God’s blessing
upon our platform and our purposes.
(Great applause.) He says that you
ought to get together and think
over these things ; to take them home
and compare them; and study them.
Well, you have got together and
studied them until there is not a lab
orer here in this great assembly that
does not know more about finances
than he has shown in his speech that
he knows to-day. (Cheering.) When
we did get together and agreed
upon a platform and the thing we
think is right, he denounced it with
all the vehemence at his command.
He denounced the people that form
ulated it. Now, fellow citizens, we
cannot let them dictate our platform;
we cannot let them dictate our poli
cies. He asks “where is the xMliance ?”
A voice. Solid; solid.
Mr. Watson. I will tell you where
the Alliance is. Although Livingston
and Moses tried to make it a tail to
the Democratic kite it is still in the
middle of the road standing upon the
platform that they, themselves form
ulated. And the Alliancemen swear
to themselves that they will never
abandon the fight until the victory is
theirs.
Voices. Never; never; never.
Mr. Watson. They tell you you
must not have partisan politics, but
I notice they never object to Alli
ancemen being partisan Democrats.
But whenever
Time called.
From Harris County.
Shipley, Ga., Sept. 21,
There has been a great deal said
in the present campaign on the sub
ject of economy. It has been thtt
advice of nearly every campaign
speaker in the democratic ranks, and
especially has it been the hobby of
Governor Northen. Now, I, for
one, say that it is good advice. Not
withstanding the fact that the far
mers of Georgia have already stinted
themselves almost to the point of
starvation it is still possible that,
being hungry, we can live on just a
little bit less food; that, being ignor
ant, we can become more so by tak
ing the little children from our
school rooms and send them to the
cotton field to labor for money to
pay the tax on a privilege that they
are too poor to enjoy. If there are
any who do not believe this to be
the situation I ask him just to go
into the rural districts of the country
and see for himself. That being al
ready weary, worn and bowed down
with the toil of many burdensome
years our old men, though their
heads are white and hoary, and a
totter in their gait, yet these old men
can still rise a little earlier in the
morning, can wield the spade a little
more vigorously even though they
do it in pain.
I, for one, am perfectly willing to
make these sacrifices, because grim
necessity forces me to make them;
for it is physically impossible for me
to make, on a one-horse farm, enough
money that my family may have
enough to eat and clothes to keep
them warm, and send little Johnnie
and Mary to school, and pay up the
doctor’s bill, pay the preacher, and
then to pay tax to keep up the State
military encampment, the Experi
mental station, and to pension all the
widows.
We accept and keep up the Con
federate home; to give SIOO,OOO to
the world’s fair, and many other
useless expenditures.
Now, as a matter of course, I
would be in favor of all these things
if we were able. Everybody knows
that the farmers of Georgia are Jess
able to pay taxes now than ever be
fore in their history; yet the tax rate
is higher than ever before. So you
see that Governor Northen ought to
economize some, too. He ought not
to want the poor people of Georgia,
distressed and debt-ridden as they
undoubtedly are, to pay tax to keep
up Camp Northen. We have got
State pride enough to be willing to it
if we were only able, but we don’t
think it is right for the State to re
duce us to the necessity of sacri
ficing the education of our children,
home comfort, etc., to pay this tax,
for it is not a necessity.
There is the world’s fair, to which
our economical Governor wanted
us to give SIOO,OOO. Now, we know
we are an ignorant set, but to our
lives we can’t see its benefit
to us. Oh, says the Governor, it will
show to the world what a prosperous
country we have. But, said we, Gov
ernor, we are not prosperous; there
is not one out of every fifty of us able
to pay up his debts and have money
enough left to pay his fare to Chicago.
Then he told us it would turn immi
gration towards thq* South. You
ought to have seen how scared we
old farmers got when the Governor
told us this, for he had just been ex
plaining to us how we had made an
overproduction of everything that
mrde prices so low. and we were
thinking of the competition. In fact,
we old farmers believe the whole
business is nothing short of a scheme
of a gang of rich real estate boomers.
The governor seemed very much
fretted that we did not help him out
in his scheme, but he ought not to
have got mad with us, for we needed
the very money he wanted us to give
to the world’s fair to pay up the
preacher and get our winter clothes,
now didn’t we, Governor ? Be hon
est, and own up.
Now, in conclusion, I want to say
a word to the campaign speakers:
You ought not to abuse we old farm
ers like you do, when you know we
are working all the day and part of
the night to make a living for you ;
and notwithstanding the fact that we
are People’s party men and you are
Democrats, you ought to recollect
that we are all Americans. Just as
“ house divided against itself must
fall,” it is even so with a government.
11. A. Poeii.
The Bloody Shirt.
National Watchman,
For many years the Democratic
party has soundly abused the Repub
licans for making use of the bloody
shirts in their campaigns. It has
been denounced as unfair, as calcu
lated to stir up strife, and keep the
people of the sections antagonized
over a dead issue. To such an ex
tent have the Democrats of the South,
and for that matter the whole country,
condemned this practice that the in
ference has obtained that similar
methods could find no supporters in
that section. But, alas I now that
the “other ox is being gored,” all
these highsounding protests turn into
the most miserable hypocricy. This
assumed highbr plane of political
ethics sinks cut of sight amid the
unblushing enforcement of the most
revolting methods that depraved
nature can suggest, and reveals the
true status of bourbon Democracy in
its hideous deformity. The present
attack on Gen. Weaver by the domi
nant Democratic element of the South
for brutal viciousness was never ap
proached, even in the palmy days of
John J. Ingalls. It is hard to con
sent, much more to believe, that such
brutality could exist among a people
who have held for years the prestige
of being both generous and chival
rous. This claim must now be sur
rendered, and the plain fact acknowl
edged that for a total absence of
manly instincts, for an absolute want
of manly principles, the average
Bourbon Democrat stands unrivaled
before the world. Not daring to
meet the great issues of the campaign,
and too cowardly to face the people
upon the last political record.these hu
man ghouls, with all the malignity of
their species, attempt to blacken or
destroy the characters of the appos
ing candidates. They have begun a
campaign of mud slinging, filth and
sectional hate that should fill the
lowest and most debased with dis
gust and astonishment. They have,
with studied brutality, dug up every
scrap, every word, and every move
of General Weaver to which an evil
coloring could be attached; these
they have distorted with venomous
interpretations until he is made to
appear as a veritable monster in
human form. These vile and sland
erous statements are printed in every
Democratic paper, read at every
Democratic meeting, and sent broad
cast among the people to rekindle
the almost extinguished flame of
sectional hate, and thereby continue
the South “solid.” Remember this
is not done by the ignorant and lower
classes, but by such leaders of public
thought as Gov. Northen, Speaker
Crisp, Gov. Jones, and the higher
class of political manipulators, assist
ed by the Atlanta Constitution, Char
leston News and Courier, and all the
other great Southern papers. But
thank God, even under this heavy
load, the cause of reform is growing
and strengthening ami ng the people
of that Democratic ridden section.
The people have learned the lesson
of Bourbon Democracy amid the hard
lines of debt, want and unremunera
tive labor. They realize that recently
a cowardly Democratic majority re
fused to grant them relief and struck
hands with the despoiler in Wall
Street. They will not listen, much
less believe, these vile attacks on
their fearless standard bearer, but
will trust him, wmrk for him, and at
the end vote for nim.
Gen. Weaver is a kind-hearted,
true-hearted, Christian gentleman,
lie is intelligent, fearless and a model
of integrity. He is worthy to be
trusted, and if successful in this con
test will give the people a pure, up
right and acceptable administration.
A vote for Weaver is a vote against
tyranny.
Illustration From Alabama*
“As an illustration of some of the
work resorted to to return Jones as
elected, it is only necessary to review
the course of the Bourbon managers
in Dallas county, where, in the city
of Selma, there are but 1, GOO voters.
The returns show 213 for Kolb and
2,4'29 for Jones, while 575 men swear
they voted for Kolb.
“In Boykin’s Beat only twenty-five
votes were polled. The managers
returned 111 for Jones. In Brown’s
Beat only thirty-two voted. Returns
show Kolb 11 and Jones 338. At
Liberty Hill Beat, Kolb voters cast
thirty-two ballots, and Jones voters
thirty-three, yet the returns show
300 for Jones and none for Kolb. In
Mitchell’s Beat only thirty votes
were polled. The returns show 11
for Kolb and 435 for Jones.
“In Orville Beat, where only fifty
votes were cast, the returns show
400 for Jones. In Portland Beat
only twenty votes were polled. The
returns show 300 for Jones. In
Martin’s Beat, where thirty votes
were polled, the returns show that
Jones has 740 and Kolb none. In
Brownsville Beat where Kolb receive
ed 338 and Jones eleven, the Jones
managers certify 338 for Jones and
11 for Kolb. These are some of the
voting precincts m Dallas county,
which county was entirely under the
Jones managers and supervisors, and
gives Jones nearly 6,000 majority.
Let every one endeavor to secure