Newspaper Page Text
THE MACON DAILY TELEGRAPH.
BY CLISBY & REID.
The Georgia Telegraph Building, Macon,
&ATKS OF flUBBCMPTION:
Daily Trlkorafh—for one r+*r «jo aa
!)aily TRijtORArH—for rix month* 5 00
ort v,r r ,crir>, k One Dollar j cr mi,nth.
Tri.SGk.irH—six m’tha 2 CO
iliMMOTR JVkikltTKLKGRAfH—onoyear..3 00
Mammoth WekiltTiuomPH-<ix monliu.-. 1 50
^ ?*<*volte always i t Advance.
Hook ana Job Prlntlna
JZFtssr'" mail with Postmaster's certificate
MACON, GEORGIA, FRIDAY MORNING, JULY 30, 1869.
No. 2831.
Itrrl.sioiui of the Supreme Court of
Georgia.
DDJ.uu) AT ATLANTA, TUESDAY, JULY 27.
[ Reported Expressly for the Constitution, by if. J
Hammond, Supreme Court Reporter. j
Killed Brown plaintiff in error, vs. Wm. Wrioht
* defendants in error. Motion for now
trial from DaKalb.
Brown, O. J.—A Guardian who acted with tho
caution of a prudent roan, and loaned tho money
of hid wards, prior to the adoption of tho Code,
first of January, 18G3, and took n note well sc
ented, by a mortgage upon negro property,
which was lost by reason of tho emancipation of
the tlavea, ianot liable to his wards for tho
amount so lost.
2. A guardian who acted in good faith, and
received Confederate Treasury notes in pay
ment of debts, duo his wards, at a timo w hen
prudent men generally received them, in pay
ment of all debts due, acted under color of law,
and is protected by tho act of 18GG; and tho
Ordinances of the Conventions of 18C5, and
I stIll. And if he loaned ont tho funds, so re
ceived prior to the 1st of January, 1863, npon
what was at tho time good security, and they
were afterwards lost, by tho results of tho war.
ho is not liablo.
3. A guardian who loaned ont or invested tho
funds belonging to his wards, after tho adoption
of tho Code, without an order of Court, did so
at his own risk, unless tho investment was, in
the stocks, bonds or other securities, authorized
liy law, and ho is liablo for tho valuo of tho
money or currency received by him, and so in
vested or loaned, allowing him a reasonable
timo to invest it, whether he lost it or nob
4. Where the guardian loaned out tho money
of his wards, after tho adoption of tho Code,
without an order of Court, and took a note for
♦ 1,5(10 for its payment, and tho Court on the
trial refnsed to allow tho note to be read in evi
dence, because it was not stampod. Held:
That tho Court did not err, aa tho guardian was
liablo in any evont in such caso, for tho valuo
of tlio currency when received, allowing him a
reasonable time to ro-invest, and tho note
wlicthor stamped or not, was proporly rejected.
Judgment revoreed.
Wm. Ezzard, for plaintiff in error.
Hill A. Chandler, for defendants in error.
Ellen 1). Dieken, plaintiff in error, vs. II. T.
Dickon, defendant in error. Action for divoroe,
and motion for temporary alimony, from Spauld
ing.
Brown, C. J.—On tho bearing of- a motion
for temporary alimony, pending an action for
divorce, tho merits of the cause are not in issue.
But under section 1733 of the Code, the Judge,
in fixing tho amount of alimony, m»j/ inquire
into the causo and circumstances of tho separa
tion, rendering tho alimony necessary, and, in
hia discretion, may refnso it altogether; or he
may gnut finch alimony, including thp expenses
of tho litigation, aa tho condition of the husband
end tho fart* of tho case may justify. But tho
Jmlgo should exorciso a sound discretion, and
should be careful that he docs not so nso this
discretionary power as to enoourago tho separa
tion of lmsltands and wives, and increase litiga
tion of this character.
2. After looking into the cause and circum
stances of this separation, wo are satisfied tho
Judgo did not abuse the discretion vested in
him by tho statute.
Judgment affirmed.
Boynton and Dismuka for plaintiff in orror.
,!>. J. Bailey for defendant in error.
Martha F. Smith, plaintiff in error, vs. Thos.
J. Cranberry, defendant in error. Injnnction
from Monroo.
Brown, C. J.—1. Tho will of James Ilogan
gave to his wifo, during her natural life, all his
estate, both real and personal, and at her death
tho estate, with its increase, to he equally di
vided, and one-half given by hla executors to
tho lawful heirs of tho body of one of his <laui
tors, and the two of tho other half to his otl
daughter during her natural life, and at her
death to go to tho lawful heirs of her body..
The will then contains this clause: “If my wifo
should, at any timo, think proper to give any
portion of my eatato, thus bequeathed, to tho
legacy abovo named, I wish hor to do so only at
her own discretion, through and by my execu
tors.” Held, that tho assent of tho qualified ex-
ntor to tho life estate of Mrs. Hogan, did not
divost him of further control over the estate.
But at her doatb, it was the right and duty of
tho executor to toko possession of the eatato,
with its increase, if any, and to administer it
according to tho directions in tho will; and as
there were no speciflo legacies, tho ordinary, on
tho application of tho exeentor, had jurisdiction
to ordor a sale for the purposes of distribution
in conformity to the will; tho vested interest
of each remainderman, being an interest in a
certain proportion of tho estate, and not a
vested interest in nny particular tract of land
or piece of personal property.
2. The executor, after tho death of the widow,
'having taken possession of tho lands of tho
• estate, and having obtained an order from the
ordinary for tho sale of tho same for the pur-
poso of distribution among tho legatees; and
nftor legal advertisement no having sold the
snmo at tho proper timo and place; and having
through A purchased the land at his own sale,
nnd after making a docil to A, tho land, on tho
second day thereafter, having beon conveyed to
him by A, by regular deed. Held, that tho
pnrcha80 by tho executor was not void, bnt was
only voidablo at the option of the legatees:
provided, they so elected within a reasonable
time. And the executor after said sale having
claimed and occupied tho land aa his own, there
by acquired an adverse possession of the feame
and a tenant placed npon the land by the execu
tor after his purchase, was his tenant, and such
tenant conld not change hia landlord by attorn
ing to tho administrator de bonis non of the
estate of Hogan.
3. Tho executor, after his purchase, whilo he
i|,.i a tenant upon tho land, entered into a mar-
riago contract with tho plaintiff in error, and
oonveyed to her a life ostate, after his death, in
consideration of marriage, without notico to her
of the nature of Ins pnrehaso ; tho marriage was
then solemnized, tfnd in a few months ho died,
leaving tho tenant upon tho premises, and his
widow commenced action against the tenant for
tho rent, and a proceeding to dispossess the ten
ant holding over. Held, that the tenant became
her tenant on the death of her husband, and the
administrator de bonis non of the estate of Ho
gan had no right to interfere in this litigation,
or to maintain a hill in equity to enjoin her ac
tion against tho tenant; tho more especially as
she resided in Bibb county, and tho litigation
between her and her tenant was ponding in
Monroe, where the bill was filed. If he, or the
legatees of Hogan, had paramount title tho liti
gation between plaintiff in error and her tenant
did not in any way interfere with their right to
commence their action of ejectment, or other
proper proceeding for tho recovery of tho land.
Judgment reversed.
Warner, J., concurred in tho judgment, bnt
not in the reversing of the Court. Ho furnished
no written decision.
McCay, J., concurred in tho judgment for the
following reasons: {■ ...
1. If property be demised to A for life with
remainder to B and C, and the executor deliver
possession of the estate to A, who enters upon
the full enjoyment of the Ufe estate, she holds
it for herself and the remaindermen. And any
duty, (as to divide the estate, or the like,) put
upon the executor, by the Will, after the ter
mination of-the life-estate, is a special trust,
and forms no part of his duty as executor, and
tho supervision of it does not belong to the
Court of Ordinary, but to the Superior Court.
2. Where one is in adverse position of land,
against the true owner, and rent* it to a tenant,
avowedly, in his character of adverse holder,
cannot attorn to the true owner, or deny the
adverse possession of his landlord.
Lanier & Anderson, R. P. Trippe, for plaint
iff in error.
Cabaniss & Peeples, for defendant in error.
fremDeiX nT8 - 8eabOniCr0ley -
H. B purchase from A two parcels
or land at the same time, and when they come
to draw the writing*, A suggests that B, to save
the writings of two deeds, take a deed for one
of the parcels from C, from whom A had pur
chased it, but had not yet got titles, saying it
would do just as well—and B consented, and
Uiere was, in fact, amortgago on the land, given
T B - was ignorant: Held, that B,
who had the mortgage to pay, might, in a suit
i a °T *?? 0 i* 1 ® notes, given at the time,
a fauuro of consideration to the amount
of his ajQmflKT- • ■—
•1 udgment affirmed.
Hill Sc Candler for plaintiff in orror.
M m. Ezzard for defendant in error.
Alfred Wooten, vs. Perry Wilkins, Cose from
Spalding.
McCay, J.—In an action by a father for the
seduction of his minor daughter, the dying de
clarations of tho daughter, as to who was the
father of her child are inadmissable, as ovidenco
for tho plaintiff.
?■' this Court may not be entirely
satisfied with a verdict of a jury, yet if tho able value aga insi the rent doe the landlord.'
Court below refuse a now trial, this Court will Bnt it is obj
not interfere to grant a new trial, unless the
verdict bo manifestly, tho result of prejudice
mistake or corruption in the jury.
Judgment affirmed.
B. D. Irwin from plaintiff in error.
Doyal & Nunn ally for defendant in error.
EmHy T ; Jackson, et al, vs. Jas. W. Corbin,
(u. Motion to dissolve injunction from Spald-
Waracr, J.—When J sold a tract of land to I,
for fourteen hundred dollars, receiving five
hundred dollars of tho pnrehaso money, and ta
king tho note of I for tho balance of tho pur
chase money, and mado a warranty deed to I,
tho purchaser, and afterwards died insolvent;
and within a short timo after the death of J, C,l
a judgment creditor J, levied an execution npon
the land in satisfaction of a judgment obtained
against J, anterior to tho sale of the land to I,
and a Bill was filed by tho widow of J. in behalf
of herself and her minor children, alleging tho
insolvency of her deceased husband, and mim
ing a year’s support out of the nine hundred
dollar note i i I
The Code, section 2949, defines a nuisance to
be “anything that worketh hurt, inconvenience
or damage, to another: and the fact that the act
done may otherwise be lawful does not keep it
from being a nuisance.”
If, then, the filling np of the gutter, which
was perfect in itself, was caused by the negli
gence or the wrongful act of the tenant above,
and was a nuisance; and it was not so filled
when the tenant below took the second lease,
tho decision of this Court in the case, Vason vs.
the City Council of Augnsta, not yet reported,
clearly fixes the liability on the tenant who
maintained the nuisance, and not npon the
landlord. In that case, this Court says: “A
landlord who has leased the premises to k tenant
is not liable for a nuisance maintained npon the
premises by the tenant, during the lease. If
the nuisance existed npon the premises when
the lease was made, the landlord is liable. But
if the tenant continues the nuisance after he
obtains cxclusiro possession and control, ho
alone is liable for its continuance. As tho
landlord, under our statute, is liable for neces
sary repairs on the premises, if the nuisance
grows out of his neglect to make the repairs, the
tenant may make them, and set off the
90 CHERRY ST. 90
GliOTIIINIi,
given for the land, as being tho only
_ _ _ lolt tor that propose, and also alleging
that if tho land sold shonld bo sold by the judg
ment creditor in satisfaction of his debt, tho
purchaser of tho land would successfully de-
1 end tho note as against her and her children,
on tho ground of failure of title, and thereby
defeat her claim to her year’s support out of the
note given to her deceased husband for the land
which is unpaid, and which is the only remain
ing estate left out of which aho can obtain hor
year’s support. Held, That it was error in the
Court in dissolving tho injnnction npon tho fore
going state of facts, inasmuch, as the widow
was entitled to her year’s support ont of the
nine hundred dollar note, and that the sale of
land should have been restrained until the rights
and equities of tho parties could be adjusted
upon tho final hearing of the cause, the purcha
ser of tho land having been mado a party to tho
bill.
Judgment reversed.
D. J. Bailey, 8. D. Irvin, for plaintiffs in
error.
Center & Treadwell vs. L. II. Davis. Caso,
from Fnlton.
Warner, J.—Where Davis, tho landlord, on
the 4th day of June, 1839, entered into a writ
ten contract with Center Sc Treadwell to rent to
them a storeroom, then in tho process of bnild-
ing, in the city of Atlanta, for tho tenn of one
year, for the sum of eight hundred dollars per
annum, with the privilege of renting said atore-
room for three additional yearn at the Rome rate,
and Davis, tho landlord, stipulated on bis part
to have said storeroom “icell fitted up and rea
dy for net, by the second Monday in August,
1805,” nnd tho tenants went into possescion of
the storeroom after its orection, occupied it
for one year, and' in pursuance of the original
contract between the parties, rented tho store
room for another year. It also appears, from
the record, that after tho making of the rent
contract, Davis, the landlord, proceeded to erect,
over the storeroom rented to the plaintiffs, and
over tho adjoining storeroom, rented to another
tenant, a boarding house and kitchen, the
boarding house, in front of the building,
and the kitchen over tho back part thereof,
But it is objected, that the case just cited
a criminal proceeding against Yason, the land
lord. So it was. But what difference does that
make ? What reason applies in favor of the ex
emption of the landlord in the ono case, that
does not in the other. U he who maintain, a
nuisance is subject to indictment and punish
ment for so doing; and is also subject to an ac
tion for damages by a person injured by tho
nuisance; where is tho reason for the distinction
between tho two cases? With what propriety
can it be contended that Davis was not liable to
indictment for this nuisance, if it had resulted
in general public injury, because ho did not
maintain it; and that his tenant was alone sub
ject to punishment because he did maintain it;
but that Davis was liable in damages to a par
ticular individual injured by it ? Are we to lay
down tho rule of law, that tho tenant is liable
criminally, because he alone maintains the
nuisance ; bnt that the landlord is liable civilly,
to an action for damages in caso an individual
is injured by tho nuisance, which is maintained
by the wrongful act of the tenant alone ?
It is said the contract and the statute of the
State, makes tho landlord liablo for the
sary repairs. Grant it But how does this avail
tho plaintiffs in error? What repairs were
wanted? There is no evidence that either the
roof or the gutter was out of repair in the place
where the injury oocurred. They were perfect,
and the damage resulted from tho obstruction
of the gutter, by the wrongful act of the tenant
above. If there had been no obstruction in the
gutter, there would have been no damage.
Bnt admit that the cleaning out of tho <
was understood, by the parties, to bo included
in tho necessary repairs of tho roof; that tho
itrties so understood it, and such was the verdict,
t was not properly speaking right. Tho evidence
was in conflict, but there was positive testimony
before tho jury, that the plaintiffs in error call
ed the attention of Davis, tho landlord, to the
condition of the roof, stating that it needed re
pairs, and that ho told them to have the repairs
mado and charge to him, and theft agreed to
doit.
Now, if the cleaning out of the gutter was
wrt of the repairs, and the tenants agreed to
iavo them made, at tho expense of the landlord,
and thoy neglected it, he is not liable to them
for tho damago resulting from their own negli
gence. And as the jury, whoso provinoe it was
to decide on tho credibility and weight of tho
evidence, havo found this issue for the landlord,
and the Judge who tried the eaae, is satisfied
with the finding, we shonld not, in my opinion,
disturb the verdict.
If this damage was tho result of a nuisance,
tho tenant who maintained the nuisance, and
not the landlord, was liable. But if it resulted
from neglect to make proper repairs, the plain
tiffs in error, who had agreed to nave them
made at tho expense of the landlord, and had
neglected to do so, havo no right to recover
from the landlord damages which resulted from
their own neglect. In either view of this ques
tion, I think the judgment of tho Court below
igbt to be affirmed.
J. M. Calhoun A Son, for plaintiffs in error.
D. F. Hammond, for defendant in error.
too\»ney“ttoo P ^°^™,fieadL fc g IMPROVED AXD WILD LANDS.
from tho boarding houso so built over tho store
rooms to tho kitchen, tho landlord rented tlio
toadUpnoifi, kitchen ami fixtrowscreeled
over tho storerooms to another tenant, who oc
cupied tho same. Theso fixtures were erected
by tho landlord, when tho plaintiffs renewed
their lease for tho second year, npon the original
contract., The ovidenco in the record shows
that, in conseqnenco of tho erection by the
landlord of tho buildings and fixtures over the
storeroom, and tho nso thereof by his tenants to
whom ho rented the some, tho plaintiffs havo
been damaged by the water thrown upon their
*oods in the storeroom, to tho amount of twelve
lundred dollars, as assessed by five merchants
called on for that purpose. Held, that inasmuch
as the landlord stipulated in his contract, to
havo the storeroom teell fitted up and ready for
\the use of the plaintiff*, that if he afterward
erected obstructions over the buildings which
|caused tho plaintiffs to bo injured, either by his
own negligence, or that of hia tenants or agents
in the use thereof, ho is liablo for tho damage
resulting thereform.
Hdd, also, that the agreement of tho tenants
to make repairs, as stated in the record, cx-
tended only to ordinary repairs of tho building,
and did not extend to making repairs by remc*
elandlo:
does not require the landlord to sweep the prem
ises nnd keep them clean whilo the tenant is oc
cupying them this is the tenant’s business if tho
ho£e —■1—I j
and if
resulted, deft
overhead was built after plaintiffs first wentmto
the honso, and thoy received their tenancy with
out objection after it was built, the trouble of
sweeping and keeping clean the premises is no
matter of which plaintiffs conld afterwards com
plain.” Held, that this charge of the Court in
view of tho facts of this case was error, and cal
culated to mislead tho jury. Tho plaintiffs were
only tenants of the store house which they
rented, thoy wore only bound to sweep and keep
that clean, it was not their business, or duty, to
sweep and keep clean the premises above them,
which caused the damage, they had no legal
right to go there for that purpose. Tho land
lord was bound by his contract to keep the
store honse rented to the plaintiffs fit tor the
use tor which he rented it to then£ and if by
obstructions placed there by himself, and used
by bis tenants, such, obstructions rendered, the
store honse unfit for the purposes tor which it
was rented, and damage resulted therefrom, the
landlord is liable therefor, and tho plaintiffs
have the legal right to complain whenever dam
aged thereby, whether they renewed their ten
ancy under their original contract, jffter the
creation of the obstructions by the landlord, or
not.
Jndgment reversed.
McCay, J. concurred as follows:
A landlord who rents a portion of a tenement
to A, is bound, either by himself or his other
tenants, to keep the remainder of tho bnildroo
in such a condition as that the
by A, shall be tenantable, and if he fails, he is
liable for the damages which A may received
from his neglect.
Brown, C. J., dissenting. ... . .
In my opinion, tho venhefc and judgment in
this caso was right, and I cannot concur m the
judgment of reversal, F A
J | The tenants elected to take the second lease
tor three years, with full knowledge that the
kitchen and passway were over the store room,
just as they remained, till the damage was done.
And if the tenant who occupied the rooms over
the store after the date of the second lease, negli
gently and wrongfully obstructed the gutter,so as
to prevent the free passage of the water from the
roof; and there was no defect in the roof or gut
ter but while it was perfect, it was filled np
with trash by the negligenoo of the tenant above,
he and not the landlord, was liable for any
that ensued by his negligence or his
wronSul act In that case, the obstruction
nlaced in the gutter by the tenant above was a
nuisance of which the tenant below had a right
to complain, and if injured by it, he had » ”ght
to recover damages against the tenant above,
tor maintaining it to his injury.
TO MEETTHR WANTSOFTUKTRADRI HAVB
ROW ON IIAN’II.
DRESS SUITS,
BUSINESS SUITS,
PROMENADE SUITS,
PLAIN LINEN MJITN,
ALPACCA COATS,
SEERSUCKER COATS,
ENGLISH LINEN COATS,
MARSEILLES VESTS.
FOR SALE.
BElUtlEN COUNTY, 9th DISTRICT.
N IMPROVED PLANTATION fourteen mitre
from Valdosta, on the Atlantic AHuir Railroad.
the «ame distance from the Hue of the Allan; &
Jrunswick Railroad, consisting of 2205 acres. There
are two sets ofdwelling-honse* and out-house*. Wit-
ton-stu. etc.; one frame house of at* room*: about
400 acres cleared and gsrtl; under cultivation. A
Isrco quantity of hammock land on the plaeeu Pro
duce* sea Island cotton at well aa upland. Will be
•old low for ca*h.
CALHOUN COUNTY.4th DISTRICT.
Lota Nos. 3M and 365, eontaininc 250 acre* each.
All of the above land* are well selected and among
the richest cotton lands of the State, and moatl;
apr!4 tf
[OFFICIAL.]
Exkcl'Tivs
Wages as. A meaner has occurred and now exists
in the office ef Ordinary of Cobb connty. canted by the
death of Elltiin A. Dobbs, the person bavins been
elected thereto.
Now. Therefore, J, Rufut B. Bullock. Governor and
Commander-in Chier of the Arm; and Navy of this
Stale, and or the Militia thereof, by virtue of the
power and authority in me vested by the Constitution
and lnws or this State, do hereby appoint Charles P.
Shepard, of the county of Cobb. Ordinary thereof to
fill the vacancy aforesaid; and order that he. the *aid
Charles P. Shepard, upon bit exeentinx and filing in
this Department hia official bond as Clerk of Ordinary
in the ram of One Thousand Dollars, with such sur
Hies thereto at the law requires, and at shall be satis
factory to me. bn commissioned.
Given under my hand and the Seal ef the Executive
Department, at the Capitol, in Atlanta, the day
and year first above written.
RUPPS B. BULLOCK.
. Governor.
By the Governor:
R. Pint. Lsstks.
Secretary Executive Department.
jalyg-sUtwit
AGENTS WANTED
rpo sell the AMERICAN BUTTON BOLE. OVER
1 SEAMING and SEWING MACHINE, for every
City. Town and Connty sonta of Nownan and Augus
ta, and in Florida east of the Aralachicola River.
Apply for Samples. Circulars and Tr *“
jqneZMm
T. S. SPEAR, Acant.
LIVERY AND SALE STABLES.
r IE undersigned has taken charge of the well
known “Chapman’s Livery Stables” m AUooa,
1 •“ —Flam street, where ho
* all its
mwirir . _ way of
transportation*! by horse or male, bagrgy, carriage or
hack, will be furnished on abort notice and at —
opposite the passenger shed, on Plum ?trcc:,whe
will conduct a reneml Livery Btaamess iu a
branches. Anythin* you may wont in tho w
able rates. Drovers will find this an old and popular
stand at which to dispose of their 5tork
febU-ly
S. H. HOLMES. Agent.
ELI WAEKXN. **'* QUCt
WARREN & GRICE,
ATTORNEYS AT LAW,
PERBT GA.,
•VT7ILL practice in the eountire of the Maecn and
VV Southern Circuitr. and in the District and Cir
cuit Courts at Savannah.
junel-d2m*
Drs. McKellar & Thompson,
OFFICE ON THIRD STREET,
in CUT BANK BVILSINa,
D O AN Y and all DENTAL WORK, at ffie shortest
notice ar.d at reasonable ficures. Ca^es fr®™-
— w?tl receive prompt attention. aprl6-tf
PHILOSOPHY OF MARRIAGE.
A NKW COURSE OF LECTURES, m delivered
A rtf N« Yort Meseum of Aaartmy. embrac
the subjects: Howto lave and What to Live tor
Yonth. Maturity and Old Aye; Manhood Genersily
Reviewed: The Cause of Indiaretioa;.
Nervous Diseases seeounted for. Mump Phjlawpbi-
eally Considered, etc- These lectures will beforwsrt-
ed on receipt of four stamp*, by ^ddreiwinx becrocary
Baltimore Museum of Anatomy. *4 West Baltimore
Street. Baltimore. Md
T. O. NISBET’S
IRON WOR KS
" MACON, G AJ
ivrinA-n PASSEKTGER. DEPOT.
mwm,
CLOTH VRsTS,
SILK VKSI\S,
BOYS 1 CLOTHING,
YOUTHS’ CLOTHING,
In fset, evervlbins la tbeCIothinf Line, all of which
made in the Latest Style* and of the
BEST MATERIAL.
GENTS’
FURNISHING
GOODS.
Best Snglish JEXalf Bose,
Best Plain and Bordered Linen
Handkerchiefs,
Best American, French and English
Suspenders,
Best Linen and Feans Drawers,
Best India Gtanzc Drawers,
Best Lisle Thread Undershirts,
Best Silk Undershirts,
Bes*. Checked SSnslin Shirts,
ALBXAZTOBB. AID GLOVES
ALL RJZZ8 AND SHADES.
Tics, Bows, Stocks,
Silk Week Handkerchiefs,
Paper CoUars,
Linen Collars—all styles.
WHITE SHIRTS
I MAKE A SPECIALTY OF
FULL BOSOM SHIRTS,
Which in.lit, make and style cannot be equaled and ia
of the best material. .
PACIFIC HAH STEAMSHIP CO.’S
THROUGH LINE TO CALIFORNIA,
CHINA AND JAP AW,
TOUCHING AT MEXICAN FORTS. AND CAR
RYING THE U- 8. MAIL.
Through to CsIUbrulu in Twenty-two Days,
STEAMsmrfi os Tnx CoxjvEcttno oh Tnx Fa-
Atlantio: cmowrrnTHx
ARIZONA, \ COLORADO.
HENRY CHATJNCEY, - CONSTITUTION,
NEW YORK, - - - - GOLDEN CITY,
OCEAN QUEEN, - - - SACRAMENTO,
NORTHERN LIGHT, - GOLDEN AGE,
COSTARICA, MONTANA.
One ofthe above large and splendid Steamships will
leave l’ior No. 42North River, foot of Canal Street, at
12 o'clock, noon, on tho 1st. 11th and 21st, of every
month (except when thoso date* fall on Sunday ,nd
then on the prceedine Saturday), for ASPINIVALL,
connecting, via Panama Railway, with one of tho
Company’s Steamship* from Panama for SAN FRAN
CISCO. touchine at ACAPULCO. •
Departures of the 1 ‘ t and21st connect at Panama
with Steamers for SOUTH PACIFIC aud CENTRAL
AMERICAN PORTS. Those of the 1st ouch.at
MANZANILLO. _ , ,
The Steamer of Auxu«t 11th, 1S69, connect* closely
with the Steamer JAPAN, leaving San Francisco
September4tb, I8G9, for Japan and China.
Ono Hundred Pounds of Ihursaxe allowed to each
adnlt. Rack-acc-Mastsrs accompany bacxajto tbrouth.
and sltend ladle* and children without male protec-
tora. Racmu received on the dock the day before
railing, from Steamboats, Railroads, and passengers
who prefer to send down earl
An experienced Surueon board. Medicine and
attendance free.
For Freixht or Passenao Tickets, or farther infbr-
mation. apply at tho Company’* Ticket Office, on the
WharfjroqT_ny CANAL STREET, NORTH ftIVKR.
CAST IRON SCREW, NO. 1.
9-12 FEET 7 INCHES DIAMETER AND 3 INCH PITCH.
Price, ■ • - ■ SB85 OO.
3’inches.
FROM TUB NUMBER OF TESTIMONIALS. TO THE VALUE OF EACH OF THESE SCREWS.
SELECT ttiE FOLLOWING:
DOUBLE BRIDGE. UPFON COUNTY. JUNE 2T. 186B.
Yours of the 17th earn* to hand on yesterday and contents noticed. The Cast Iron Screw I bousht of you
last fall sivea entire satisfaction. I commenced paeklne my crop without weiahins I* the cotton, thinkio*
that f«> pounds was beineput in: hut when I came to sell my eoUon th* bats wel«h«i from (WO to 8ufi pounds.
I sold the cotton tobwatta* Brown, at BarneavUle, and anyone doubtln* the waiahteau bo furnished the
receipts from the above partis*. I have been farmiea alt my life, mad havo used many different Screws, but
this ms I* the best I ever saw. In paekins my crop I never used hut one mule. I take pluaure In recoup
raendin* Ike Screw to planters xenerally. D. W. MUMBLE.
Itcfeeeurr of those sna* the ahooe Streu .*
\V. T. Rsnaar, Houston county. I Haatv F*«L*r. Baldwin eiunty.
JoxlW*i.kxb. Houston county. I Joint Psecsti Putnam county.
W l* on gilt Iron Screw, jST o. 1
4 Inch Wrought Iron, 3 inch Pitch Screw. PRICE, - - - $90 00.
MILLKIXJRVILLK. JUNK 17. 1800.
Dkab Si«:—I run using one of your 4 inch Cotton Pr«»« Scmn*. :* inch pitrh. with lever*. a Uptc J to
male-power* I. however, never use male-power bat run it down by hand. I am satisfied that it will do
more work In the same time, and with much more ease, than the old wood screw, and that it is ten times
as durable. Yea will allow me, at the same time, to recommend your horse power as a volnnbla i»wnr
sin cotton. bour* respectfully. * JOHN JUNES.
PERRY. JUNE 21. IMS.
Dess Si*:-1 am asiax oneofinur tin. Wrousht Iron Screws, 3in. pitch, and it is all you represent it to be.
I pack with hand-power levsrs. and have put HUH pound* in a bale with six hands, t like the press so well
that I want you ti |e*. me up another and shall be in Macon about the 1st of Aujtust^ ROUNDTREE
- Reference of eome of Ihnee usinp the four inch Press, three pitch :
(Itstar Suit*, Houston county. I W. O. Csai.ia, Ilibh county.
John W. WooLroLK. Houston county. I Tims. U. Jon vs. Twixsa county.
WiLLisu Anting. Dooly county. | J. P. Bj^nn.Twi^county.
N. Tuckks. Lauren* county.
J. W. Bimsinna. Washington county.
WROUGHT IRON SCREW, NO. 2.
1, 11-3 AND 3 1NOII PITCH,
PRICE, ----- #80 OO.
CLINTON. Os- 1WS.
T. C. Nik bet. Krq.: -I can safety say your Press l* all. and perhaps tiiore, than yot* claim it to he.
It is the cheapest, easiest and most convenient ptf'kinjc apparatus I have seen. Ihavesecntwo
hand* pack a bale of coital that we supposed to weigh fM pounds.
IIKNRi J. MAILSIIALL.
T. C- NiaitKT, Esq.I am well pleased with yourl’n
cotton weiahins six hundred and forty pounds ia thirty
Jmm Kino, Houston county.
W. A. Atwooo. Putnam county.
Bnnj. Uasrou, Jasper county.
MACON G».. HUM.
a. I have packed with six hands a bale of
minute*.
R. F. WOOLFOLK. 1
RKFEItKirrKS:
I Wa. Sraasnnncon. Monroe county.
Tuns. Basson. Talbot county.
J. A. Srtvxv, Macon connty.
No. 2 CAST IRON SCREW,
Pin 7 1-2 Feet Long, 6 inch DhuuHcr and 2 inch Pitch.
PRICK, $70.
olo-power levers, hut
J. A. MADDOX.
2 Inch.
. . „ FORT VALLEY. JUNE. 1889.
T.C. Nisbit—Dear Sir: I bare been uslnr your Cast Iron Screw Press. 2 Inch pitch, for two season*. I have
on hesitation in recommendin* itaa a simple, compact and durable press. I bare mule-
press altosether by band. . , ,
Reference to a few of thesee metuo the above Preeet
Frantss K. Bassett, Houston connty. I Joan Teal. Quitman county.
H. J. Clark. Houston connty. I A. Dawson, Wilkinson oonoty.
Tho abore Screws are ell warranted for one season. The price does not include Frame and Box, bnt
draft to bnild from wilt be famished.
IRON FRAME. Priee - -....fcS 00
WOOD WORK, complete. 30 (X)
Thc«e Screw* are Iona enouab far a nine foot Cotton Box. as the entire lenatb of the Screw can be used
bnt when alonaer Fcrtw to required it can he furnished up to 12 fact.
Q X 1ST GEAR
EIGHT FEET GIN GEAR. PINION AND B0LT8.
NINE FKKTG1N GEAR
TEN PKET GIN
PORTABLE Ilf
.. harf footo»
NKW YORK.
maylO-Smo
F. R. BABY Azent.
T.
T.
miBERRY TOOTIIWASh.
Preserves and Whitens tho Xceth 1
Invigorates and Soothes tho Qnms!
Cleans and Purifies Artificial Teeth!
Purifies and Perfumes tho Breath!
Prevents Accumulation of Tartar!
Zs a Superior Articlo for Children!
IT IS WARRANTED FREE
Prom Injurious Ingredients!
I T to scientifically prepared in sorer
most valuable formulae known to
It baa been extensively uted far sever
‘ use by I
tested i
accordance with tho
nto tlio profession.
_ gavtral year?, and is
recommended for aenaral use by numerous Dentist,
and Physicians who have tested ita merit*, and who
appreciate the importance of preserviua the Teeth
tbronab tile.
Ptoprielor: A M. WILSON. Vhilatrlnbta
For sale by J. 11. ZKtLIN A CO.. Macon.
LtnoSAlIlKT or PHAlMACtUT'CAt. )
aid Amalytcal CnaainTET. >
Atlanta, Georgia-1
Tbit to to certify that I have examine Treao’s Tea
berry Tooth Wash end Tooth Powder. I find them
free Iroin substances that would aet injuriously upon
the Teeth, and can recommend Treto’a Preparation!
o those In want ora superior dent rides.
maylfi-Cm W. J. LAND. Chemist
R
0
S
A
D
Cane Mill [Prices
ElflnTKEN INCH MILL.
SIXTEEN INCH MILL
FIFTEEN INCH MILL.....
ELEVEN INCH MILL.—
HATS, UMBRELLAS, BTC.
S3. I keep a fall stock of three articles always ON
aides 3 ' HAND'S* <-'•** 7
A CALIj viU CONVINCE EVERYBODY.
J. H. HERTZ,
-t SUCCESSOR TO TURPIN A HERTZ.)
aprll-tf
90 Cherry Street.
130 Gal. Price. *#.
too - -dS
90
99
f*
80
pm
.
70
99
t»
60
99
; V. t**. ;
40
9*
j5ff
IS
—
KETTLE PRICES:
INK HUNDRED AND THIRTY GALLONS.
NE HUNDRED GALLONS
HOflTY GALLONS !
JXTY GALLONS
25 Berm Steen Engine, priee,
29 Herne Steam Engine, priee,
Beiiers to Match the above Engines,
Circular Saw Mill,
...432 m
.... 25 00
.... 20 00
.... 17 00
$1090
iooo
500
500
SEND FOjR A CIRCULAR.
T. C. USTISJBIET.
jnly20-2tawAw3m
OSADALISt
'I'llK ORBIT AMERICAN HEALTH
1 JJe.iinrcr. pntinci the blood nn,l cure*
| .ScrdTutn. Syphili •. Skin Diaoues, Hlieuma-
I ttsm. Dbeaaoaof Wqmen. iuol :,ll rhronie
| A flections o'the Blood. Ltrernml Kidney*.
I Itocomruended by th* Medical Fncultynml
I many thousands of oor best eitiicnr. Read
th* testimony nf Physicians and patient*
who have used Ko-adsll*; rend for our
! Kotadalia Guide to Health llook.nr Alma-
I nae far this year, which wo publish lor
gratuitous distribution: it will give you
much raluabie information:
Dr. H. W. Carr, ef Baltimore, fays—I
I lake pleasure in recommending your Ko*a-
dslto as a very powerful altenitivo. I bavo
seen it used in twoeaaea with happy resu Ils;
one in a case of secondary >yphili*. in
which the Patient j.ronuunccd himself
cured after flavin* taken live bottles nf
your medicine. The nlher i* a case of
scrofula of Iona stondinr. which i* rapidly
improvinir under ita use. and the indica
tions areihai the i-atientwilisoonrecover.
I have carefully examined the formnlin
by which your Ro*sdalia is made, and find
■it an excellent compound of nlterativo in
gredients.
Dr. Sparks, of Kieboluville.Ky., say* ha
has used Koeadalisin eases of Scrofula and
Secondary Fypbili* with satisfactory re
sults—as a cleaner ofthe Blood I know no
better remedy.
Hamnel O. McFaddcn, of Murfreesboro.
Tean., says:
I hare naad seven boltlcs of Rosadalis.
and am entirely enred of Rheumatism:
send me four bottles, as I wish it for my
brother, who hss Ferufulous Sore Eyes.
Beniamin Eechtol, of Lima. Ohio, writes:
I have suffered far twenty year* with an
Inveterate eruption over my whole body ; a
short time since I purchased a bottle of
Koeadalis and it effected a perfect cure.
IS SOLD BY ALL DRUGGISTS.
*R.Laboratory, No. 61 Exchange Place.
Baltimore. 0
Drt. Clements. Rives*.Co.,
Proprietors
For sale by
j. h. zmz.inr &. co.
iulxfi-tf
COLQUITT & BAGGS,
Cotton Factors & General Commission
IVIElv CHANTS.
BAY STREET, SAVANNAH, oA.
CPECIAL attention to the sale of Cotton, Lumber
O and Timber. Liberal advances on C< rsirnments.
apr9-tf '
CHANGE OF_SOHEBCLE.
VO CHANGE of CARS BETWEEN SA VANN A H
AUGUSTA AND MONTGOMERY. ALA.
Trakbpobtatioe Office C. K. R., \
Savahxah, Oa.. August 14.1868.J
O K AND AFTER SUNDAY. 16th mar., PAS8KN
GKR. Traini on tho Georgia Central Railroad
will run as follow?:
Aagneta
Milledgeville ^
with train that leaves An-
6:40 t, m
&38 r. m.
8:58 r. if.
11:00 r. m.
Eatonton
OMMttV; - ... W —PP..
gufta at—. - re.... see 8:45 a. m
DOWN DAY TRAIN.
Macon.. ........^..—..7:00 a. u.
Savannah —.... 5:30 p. u.
Augurta........ 5:28 p. u
Connecting with train that leaves Au
gusta at —— 8:46 a. m
UP NIGHT TRAIN.
Savannah - —-7:24* p. m.
Augnsta 3:13 a. m
Connecting with trahm that leave Au
gusta at ih33 r. m
DOWN NIGHT TRAIN.
Macon - 6:25 v. *.
Savannah 5:1G a. m
Augnsta 3:13 A. M
Milledgeville - —-.4:30 r. u.
Eatonton. .....2:40 p. x.
Connecting with train that leaves Aa-
gUfita At™ re re ... ..... jJoli P. If.
«-A. M. Train* from Savannah and AugnMa. and
r. w. Train from Macon, connect with Milledgeville
Train at Gordon daily. Sundays excepted
J»-P M Train from Savannah connect* with
0i, tS tern a3 '‘ ROGERS,
1 General Superintendent.
aag!5-tf
