The forest news. (Jefferson, Jackson County, Ga.) 1875-1881, September 03, 1880, Image 1
: oB EKT S.
1 gditor and Publisher. i
OLUMK VI.
PUBLISHED EVERY FRIDAY.
: S. HOWARD, Editor and Publisher,
V jEFFFIt SON, JACKSON CO ., OA. .
S. E. COH. PUBLIC SQUARE, UP-STAIRS.
TERMS OF SUBSCRIPTION.
. copy I*2 months $1.50
■ l.OO
“ 3 “ 50
every Club of Ten subscribers, an ex
s opy of the paper will be given.
HATES OF ADVERTiSING.
(ISE Dollar per square (of ten lines or less)
tirst insertion, and Seventy-five Cents
| a oh subsequent insertion.
xpiare is a space of one inch, measured
..jfld lown the column.
jgf All Advertisements sent without spcciiica
jjofthe number of insertions marked thereon,
ho published till forbid, and charged
fjrdingly.
jjrliusiness or Professional Cards, of six lines
< s?, Seven Dollars per annum; and whore
f r do not exceed ten linos, Ten Dollars.
£cgal' Jlitaertisements.
pEOKCiIA, Jackson County.
Whereas, J. W. U. Hamilton and T. K. Smith,
iiministrators on the estate of Dailey Chandler,
lute of said county, deceased, applies for leave to
blithe lands belonging to said estate—
This is to cite all concerned, kindred and cred
, to show cause, if any they can, at the regu
i-tenn of the Court of Ordinary of said county,
Bthe first Monday in October, 1880, why said
jjvc should not be granted the applicants.
Given under iny official signature, August ‘22d,
aug*27 11. W. BELL, Ord’y.
rtEOIUxIJ, Juclckou County.
IT ———.
Whereas John F. Evans, Executor of the last
nil and testament of Daniel Evans dec’d rep
ents to the court, by his petition duly filed,
hat he has fully administered the estate of said
itceftscd, and is intitled to a discharge —
This is to cite all concerned, kindred and
"editors, to show cause, if any, on the first
londay in November, 1880 at the regular term
fthe court of Ordinary of said county why the
liters of Dismission should not be granted* the
pplieant.
Given under my official signature, this August
11,1880. H. W. BELL, Ord’y.
UIORCiIA, Jackson County.
Whereas, W. A. Watson, Administrator upon
lie estate of Anacliy Hopson, late of said county,
leccaied, applies for leave to sell real estate of
aid deceased—
This is to cite all concerned, kindred and cred
itors, to show cause if any, on the first Monday
it September, next, at the regular term of the
s'irt of Ordinary of said county, why said leave
mould not be granted the applicant.
Given under my official signature, this August
11880. 11. W. BELL, Ord’y.
(jEORUIA, Jackson County.
Whereas, S. P. Higgins, Administrator upon
Restate of Polly Simmons, late of said county,
applies far leave to sell the land belonging to
Restate of said deceased—•
This is to cite all concerned, kindred and cred-
Mrs, to show causo, if any, on the lirst Monday
a September next, at the regular term of the
' art of Ordinary of said county, why, leave to
■ >aid land should not bo granted the applicant,
dived under iny official signature, this August
kISSO. H. W. BELL, Ord’y.
Georgia, JackNou County.
J'hcreas, C. M. Wood, Administrator upon
-estate of Amanda M. Loggins late of said
>nty. deceased, applies for leave to sell the real
and Ga .It. It, Stock, belonging to said
state—
i; s is to cite all concerned, kindred and cred-
; N - to sliow cause, if any, on the lirst Monday
- ' ptember next at the regular term of the
Y of Ordinary of said county, why leave to
real estate and Georgia R. R. Stock
: 'JhI not be granted the applicant.
~ lvon under my official signature, this August
11. W. BELL, Ord’y.
WHITE LEAD
AND
OILS,
Garnishes & Colors,
DRUGS,
SEDICIXES and CHEMICALS,
Grass and Clover Seed.
~o r of above, or anything in the Drug line,
L C. LONG & CO.,
Wholesale & Retail Druggists,
ATHENS, OrJ±.
October 24th, 1879.
TEETH9R3 A.
(lUKTHIN6 POWDERS.)
♦ Tiros Cholera Infantum. Allays Irritation and
'i rm cas J'* Removes and prevents
of Children mat/he saved CV
- , 'V near by usiny these FoiVtiers.
ior **le at UR. PENDERGRASS, Drugstore.
THE CASE STATED FROM THE MINORITY’S
STANDPOINT.
jin Address, in Which the Ulinovity Narrates
Its Side of the Proceedings of the Late Con
vention—The Selection of Ex-Senator Nor
wood to Lea/1 the Forces.
To the People oj the State of Georgia, ;
The Gubernatorial Convention which as
sembled here under a call of the State Demo
cratic Executive Committee, on the 4th
instant, as you well know, failed to make a
nomination of a candidate for the office of
Governor. The duties imposed upon that
convention wore to nominate a Governor,
State House officers and Presidential electors]
All the duties were performed except that of
nominating a Governor. Before the conven
tion there were four candidates ether than
Governor Colquitt, viz: lions. Rufus E.
Lester, Thomas Hardeman, Jr., Gen. L. J.
Gartreli and Judge Hiram Warner. It was
apparent upon the assembling of the conven
tion that there was a majority for Alfred 11.
Colquitt. I low* that majority was obtained
is well known to you. While all the other
candidates remained at home except Col.
Hardeman and Gen. Gartreli, each of whom
made a few speeches during the canvass, Gov-
Colquitt took the stump, and, aided by his
friends, canvassed the State at large. By
appealing to the people on the ground that
he was persecuted for religion’s sake, and the
hearing being ex parte, he succeeded in getting
a majority of the delegates to the convention.
Wo will not pause at this moment to show
the utter fallacy of the position taken that
he was persecuted, but will content ourselves
by simply referring to the fact that in 187 G
the minority delegates in the late convection,
and their constituencies over the State, now
bitterly opposed to Gov. Colquitt’s adminis
tration, unanimously assisted in electing him
by a majority of 80,000 votes. Nothing was
then said about his religion, and nothing lias
been said since then except by a few in
dividuals scattered throughout the State, who
have made reference to the fact that he has
too frequently left his office to attend religious
meetings in the South and in the North.
The true issue before the people then and
now, which is the incompetency of the Ex
ecutive and the scandals which have grown
out of his official acts during his administra
tion. was not discussed in that canvass. By
earnest s*nd personal appeals to friends
throughout the State, that majority iu the
convention was obtained. We believed that
it was not a fair expression of your opinion,
and yet, though so believing.* if Governor
Colquitt could have obtained a two-thirds
vote of that convention, the minority, rep
resenting the four other candidates named
above, pledged themselves upon the floor of
the convention, that they would not only
abide by the nomination, but would support
him at the polls.
On the assembling of the convention,
General P. M. B. Young, a delegate from
Bartow, in advance of the repart of the Com
mittee on Rules, announced on the floor of
the convention, as the friend of Governor
Colquitt, that the majority desired the adop
tion of the two-thirds rule for nominations,
and that he was authorized to say it was
Governor Colquitt’s wish that it should be
adopted, and that Governor Colquitt would
not accept a nomination unloss it was made
by a two-thirds vote. The committee then
reported the following rules, among others,
and the convention, without debate, adopted
it as the law of the convention :
1. No vote shall be counted for any person
whose name has not been previously placed
in nomination as a candidate for the office
voted for.
2. No name shall be placed in nomination
for any office unless the delegate proposing
shall state in his place that he has the au
thority of the gentleman proposed so to do.
On the first ballot for Governor on Thurs
day, Governor Colquitt received 208 votes.
During Thursday, Friday, Saturday, Monday
and Tuesday thirty-two ballots were had, and
from the first to the thirty-first ballot Gov
ernor Colquitt's vote fluctuated between 205
and 212 and a fraction. The last ballot,
which was had under peculiar circumstances,
which we will hereafter narrate, gave him 220
and a fraction, as reported by the clerk,
though the minority claim that there was an
error in the count in his favor.
You will observe that by one of the above
rules of the convention, and which were stren
uously objected to by all the opposition to
Governor Colquitt, the convention was limited
in its balloting to a choice of one of the live
gentlemen first named for Governor. These
rules were, of course, adopted by a majority
vote, and that majority were the friends of
Governor Colquitt. Their object in adopting
that restrictive rule was clearly to compel the
minority in the end to accept Governor
Colquitt or nobody. They believed they
would and could thereby force the minority
to abandon their convictions of right and
duty and to accept a candidate whom the
minority opposed on principle. The minority
saw their purpose as the sequel proved, anu
solemnly resolved that, as freemen charged
with a high trust by you, they would never
surrender so long as they were denied the
right which belongs to every freeman in
America, to cast his ballot for any man he
may prefer. That undemocratic, tyrannical
rule enforced the gag law and denied to the
minority who opposed Governor Colquitt
freedom of the ballot —a right which, even
under Bullock's administration, was never
denied to a citizen of this fetate.
On the second day of the balloting Dr. H.H.
Carlton, a delegate from the county ofClarkc,
presented to the convention the following list
of names of distinguished gentlemen in the
State, every one of whom you will recognize
at sight of his name, to be a man ot the
highest character and in every way fit for the
office of Governor: General Lawton. General
Jacksen. T. M. Norwood, J. B. Camming,
J. C. C. Black, J. M. Smith. M. H. Blandford,
P. W. Alexander, M. J. Crawford, A. 0.
Bacon, Cliff. Anderson, H. G. Turner, .James
Jackson, Aug. Reese, Geo. Hillyer, G. T.
Barnes, H. D. McDaniel, W. H. Dabney, A.
T. Mclntyre, W. M. Hammond, M. A. Candler,
D. E. Betler, John I. Hall, R. P. Trippe. T.
G. Lawson, H. V. M. Miller, A. H. Stephens,
N. J. Hammond, J 11. Blount, Joel. A,
JEFFERSON, JACKSON COUNTY, GA., FRIDAY. SEPTEMBER 3, 1880.
Billups, and stated to the majority that the
minority wero willing to accept any gentle
man whose name was on the list and vote for
him unanimously, or for any other good man
in the State whom the mojority-would agree
upon. This proposition was repeated times
without number during the balloting for Gov
ernor and was every time met by jeers and
laughs from the majority. On Friday Hon.
Patrick W alsh, of Richmond, the general
spokesman of Gov. Colquitt, made a speech
in which he declared that the majority had
come there “ to nominate Alfred 11. Colquitt
and nobody else !” On Saturday the minority,
through Dr. Carlton, offered the majority the
name of Hon. Alexander 11. Stephens, with
the declaration that if acceptable to the ma
jority the minority would vote for him unani
mously. This proposition was met by the
derisive question, “ By what authority is the
name of Mr. Stephens presented to this
body ?” and no further notice of the offer
was taken by the majority, except the cry of
“ ballot!”
Again on Saturday, Mr. Reid, a delegate
from Putnam, who was earnestly patriotic
and deprecated the possibility of an adjourn
ment without a nomination, put in nomina
tion Judge T. G. Lawson, of Putnam, as a
compromise candidate. He did so with the
assurance of the minority that if Judge
Lawson should receive such a vote from the
adherents of Governor Colquitt as to raise a
hope of his nomination, the minority would
change their votes to him. The ballot re
sulted in only votes actually cast for Judge
Lawson.
On Monday Mr. Imbodcn, a delegate from
Lumpkin and a supporter of Colonel Lester,
made the proposition to the majority that they
might name any suitable man in the State of
Georgia and the minority would accept him
unanimously.
Again on Saturday a proposition was made
by the minority to raise a conference commit
tee, in which there should be a majority of the
friends of Governor Colquitt, for the purpose
of agreeing upon a name to be presented to
the convention. This proposition also was
met by laughter and cries of “ ballot 1” On
Monday and on Tuesday tnis proposition was
repeatedly renewed and every effort made to
induce the majority to consent to a nomina
tion of someone else than either of the can
didates before the convention.
All these efforts were met by a resolution
offered in the convention Tuesday morning,
by the Honorable Patrick Wal3h, which was
as follows:
Therefore he it resolved, That this conven
tion recommend to the people of Georgia
General A. 11. Colquitt as the Democratic
candidate for Governor of Georgia at the
ensuing election, provided that this resolution
does not go into effect untill three ballots
shall have been taken under the two-thirds
rule and it is demonstrated that no nomina
tion can be effected thereby.
Upon this resolution the majority called
the previous question, thus preventing all
discussion, and it was adopted against the
protest of the minority by a strictly majority
vote, excepting the votes of Colquitt delegates
from twoor three counties who were unwilling
for the convention to adjourn without a nom
ination.
The resolution of recommendation was
adopted on Tuesday afternoon. On Wednes
day morning the electors and Stato officers
were nominated, and the work of the conven
tion, except the nomination of a candidate
for Governor, was finished. The majority,
instead of adjourning sine die, took a recess
until 3p. m. Their object was a caucus
secret, and was unknown by even some of the
Colquitt delegates. The minority supposed
and hoped their purpose was to rescind the
resolution of recommendation and to resume
the ballot for Governor; but after the adop
tion of the usual complimentary resolutions
a Colquitt delegate moved an adjournment
sine die, which the minority opposed, and
demanded a call of the counties on the vote.
Every delegate of the minority voted against
adjournment and all the Colquitt delegates
voted for it except about ten. After the vote
on adjournment was taken and before the
Chair announced the result the delegates from
Harris county changed their four votes to
Governor Colquitt, which, added to the last
ballot for Governor taken the day defore,
gave Governor Colquitt 223 13-30 votes.
These facts are stated that you may under
stand under what pressure that number of
votes was obtained. The object of the recess
till 3 p. m. was not to give the convention
an opportunity to ballot again for Governor,
but it was, as we afterwards heard, to have
time to learn if the minority were intimidated
by the prospect of adjournment without a
nomination for Governor, and with the hope
that they would cravenly surrender to the one
man power and tyranny, which from first to
last subjugated that convention.
Wo have thus laid before you in detail the
actions of the Colquitt delegates and the vari
ous offers of the minority for a compromise,
and to preserve harmony and tiie organization
of the Democratic part}', that you may judge
who are to blame for the schism produced by
the failure to make a nomination for Governor.
We, speaking for the minority, were not sent
to the convention as the tools or slaves of any
man. We came as representatives to nominate
candidates for the united suffrage of the De
mocracy, and not to disorganize and divide
the party, because our claim or preference
was not nominated. We belong to no man.
We set no man above his party. We hold
the unity of our party and the peace and
prosperity of our State dearer to us than the
gratification of the ambition or greed for office
of any one man, or clique, or syndicate. We
loathe and detest one-man power ! We would
not then, and we will not now, submit to it.
When we were put upon notice that the Col
quitt delegates came “to nominate Colquitt
or nobody,” we accepted the defiant declara
tion, and inflexibly resolved, to a man, that
we would never consent to his nomination.
To have done otherwise would have been
degradation and a surrender of your rights.
Gov. Colquitt is your servant, not your master.
You made him, and you have the right to
unmake him. That defiance was to you, as
the convention was only the people of Georgia
j assembled by representation. And had you
! boon unitedly u&6eaibled. even though you
FOR THE PEOPLE.
might have come together unanimously in
favor of Gov. Colquitt, we mistake your man
hood and patriotism and self-respect, if you
would not have met such a demand by a
unanimous and indignant rebuke. If it be
said that Gov. Colquitt was not responsible
for that declaration, we reply that Mr. Walsh
was a recognized leader of the Colquitt
delegates ; that the declaration was known by
Governor Colquitt, and he never authorized
anyone to deny it in the convention; that
lib course during the convention corroborated
the statement of Mr. Walsh, and clearly
proved that he was resolved that no other
man in Georgia should be nominated except
himself. This is proved by the fact that lie
attended the caucus of his delegates on Satur
day -ght, m'.d made apathetic appeal to them
never to desert him and by the fact that the
Augusta Chronicle, Air. Walsh’s paper, an
nounced on Sunday morning following that
caucus that no nomination for Governor
would be made ; and by the farther fact known
to you all, that when Governor Colquitt and
his delegates became convinced that his
nomination by a two-thirds vote was impos
sible, they determined to pass the resolution
of recommendation, and he agreed to go
before you as a candidate on that certificate
alone. Besides this proof we present tiie
further facts that Governor Colquitt had a
brother on the floor, though not a member of
the convention, every hour of its sitting,
closely observing and actively at work, and
that an advisory caucus was held in the Execu
tive office during each sitting, and after each
adjournment.
In view of these facts we submit the grave
question of the responsibility of a failure to
nominate a candidate for Governor to your
decision. The Colquitt delegates proposed
the two-thirds rule, and the convention
adopted it. Mr. Walsh, on the first day of
the convention, offered a resolution declaring
it to be the sense of the convention that the
majority rule should be adopted by ail future
Gubernatorial conventions. On a call of the
counties, which is virtually a vote by ayes
and noes, the convention refused to endorse
the majority rule. Tims the convention de
clared the two-thirds rule to l#e the law of
that body, and that it ought to be the law of
all future Gubernatorial conventions. The
law of the convention, therefore, was that no
man could go to the people as its nominee
unless and until he should obtain two-thirds
of the votes cast. That vote Governor Col
quitt never got. He is, therefore, not the
nominee of the Democratic party, but is a
self-appointed candidate with the endorse
ment of the Colquitt delegates. Those dele
gates insist that as he is almost a nominee,
therefore he is a nominee. They say he had
a large majority in the convention. That is
true ; but they enacted the law that no man
should go out of tlie convention and tell you
he is a nominee unless they gave him a two
thirds vote. That law was not repealed, and
when the Colquitt delegates and Governor
Colquitt claim for him the right to your sup
port as a nominee, they and he are doing so
in defiance of the law of their own making.
For. while lie had a personal following of a
numerical majority, he had a minority and
received a minority vote under the law which
required a two-thirds vote as a majority.
Governor Colquitt, therefore, comes before
you not as the nominee of your delegates, but
as a candidate recommended by a number of
the citizens of Georgia.
After the adjournment of the convention,
the delegates who constituted the minority
remained in the Representative Hall, to con
sider what course should be taken to give you
the opportunity to have a choice of men for
the high office of Governor. With Governor
Colquitt alone in the field, you could not do
otherwise than tamely submint to what we
feel to be a great wrong. We had agreed in
the convention to give you a nominee, as a
candidate for whom a united Democracy could
vote. We were willing and anxious to pre
sent to you any one of over a hundred good
and true men in Georgia. Governor Colquitt
held ins delegates with an iron hand for six
days, and would not consent for you to have
any man in Georgia but himself. Crushed
under his grasp the convention broke up, and
unless another candidate were presented you
wouid have been left with no right to choose.
We believed it to be our duty to you to give
you the opportunity to express your choice
between Governor Colquitt and some other
man. As your representatives had failed to
make a choice out of so large a number of
able and honorable men in the State, it is
your right t.o exercise the power which you
delegated to them, and which they refused
to exerciseforyou. We, therefore,determined
to consult with citizens from different sections
of the State in order to decide, first, whether
you desired another candidate, and secondly,
who would probably be your preference for
Governor. We soon heard an almost universal
demand for a Democratic candidate to oppose
Governor Colquitt, and we decided in a large
meeting of citizens of the State, including
many of the miuority in the late convention,
in the Representative Hall, that the people
for the good of the State, and in assertion of
the manhood of the Democratic party which
personalism had ruled and mastered in the
convention, should have another candidate.
We say for the good of the State, because
the scandals which have grown out of the
very peculiar administration of affairs of the
Stato in Georgia during the last three years call
aloud for action and redress. The incom
petency of tiie administration does not admit
of a doubt. The division of opinion is not
on the incompetency of the present admin
istration, but relates to still graver matters,
and when criticism on the administration
made by a large portion of the Democratic
party is as Severe as was made on Bullock's
administration, it is time for Demoorac} r to
move for reform and purification. What the
acts of the present Executive are that have
provoked such grave charges, are familiar
to you, as they have been published in the
press of the State and undergone review and
discussion, untill the opposition to an Ex
ecutive almost unanimously elected in 1876,
wil, we believe, work his defeat in the coming
election.
In order, therefore, that the facts herein
set forth may be properly represented to the
people of Georgia, and that the voters *tr.<l
tax-payers of the State may have an oppor
tunity to pass judgment upon the administra
tion of Governor Colquitt, it is deemed pro
per and necessary that a candidate bo brought
forward who will reflect, not only the wishes
of our constituents, but of a large number
of the people who have thus far taken no part
in the present contest. Upon this point of
selecting a suitable candidate, we have
happily found but little difficulty. The oc
casion itself indicates the proper person to
be presented to the people for their suffrages ;
but if wo had been in doubt, the manifesta
tions of public opinion in ail parts of the
State would have dispelled that doubt. The
people in the cities and towns, and along the
lines of railways, as well as in the country,
where they could bo reached, have not been
content with a single expression of their
preference, but the}’ have resorted to the rails
and the telegraph to swell the popular voice.
Yielding, then, to the unmistakable voice
of the people of Georgia, and in obedience to
its mandate, we herewith present the name of
that spotless patriot and gifted statesman, the
Hon. Thomas M. Norwood, of Chatham.
Whilst we found no difficulty in making a
suitable choice of a candidate, it is but just
to say that it was only after repeated calls
and earnest appeals that Mr. Norwood gave
his reluctant consent to enter the contest as
the standard hearer in the cause of reform
and good government. lie had no thought
or desire to occupy the position of a candidate,
and it was only at the last moment that he
consented to sacrifihe his personal feeling and
busines interests, and to take the position to
which his fellow-citizens have called him.
Should the call now made be ratified by the
people at the polls, we feel sure thst they will
never find it necessary to “ investigate” Mr.
Norwood's official conduct at ever}’ turn, nor
to submit to such painful scandals as those
at which they now hide their faces; nor will
he. at the close of his administration, come
before the country and ask for a renomina
tion m order to “ vindicate” himself against
the criticism of his friends and supporters
who shall have elevated him to the high and
reaponsihile position of Chief Magistrate of
the State.
Josiaii L. Waiiren, Chatham.
R. F. Lyon, Bibb.
H. 11. Carlton, Clarke.
F. W. Alexander, Cobb.
I). B. Harrell, Webster.
F. G. Wilkins, Muscogee.
J. VC. Staten, Echols.
F. M. Imboden, Lumpkin.
11. T. Hollis, Marion.
Geo. M. McDowell, Pike.
Walter R. Brown, Fulton.
Hon. Thomas M. Norwood, Atlanta:
Dear Sir — As the representatives of the
large and patriotic minority of the late Demo
cratic Convention which assembled in this
city on the 4th instant, and in obedience, as
we believe, to the wishes of a majority of the
people of Georgia, it becomes our pleasant
duty to inform you that you have been selected
as their candidate for the office of Governor
at the approaching election, and to request
that you allow them the use of your name for
that high and responsible position.
We are aware that you do not desire, and
have not sought, the nomination, yet we trust
you will yield to the general wish, and permit
your name to be presented to the people of
your native State for the highest office within
their gift.
Meanwhile, wo remain, dear sir,
Yours, very truly,
Josiaii L. Warren, Chatham.
R. F. Lyon, Bibb.
11. 1L Carlton, Clarke.
P. W. Alexander, Cobb.
D. B. Harrell, Webster.
F. G. Wilkins, Muscogee.
J. W. Staten, Echols.
F. M. Imho den, Lumpkin.
11. T. Hollis, Marion.
Geo. M. McDowell, Pike.
Walter li. Brown, Fuilon.
Atlanta, August 13, 1880.
Messrs. Josiah L. IVarern, JR. F. Lyon, 11.
11. Carlton, P. JV. Alexander, JD. B. Har
rell, F. G. Wilkins, J. W. Staten, F. M.
Lnboden, 11. T. Hollis, Geo. M. McDowell,
Walter 11. Brown:
Your communication inviting mo to boa
candidate before the people of Georgia for
the office of Governor is this day received.
Asa delegate to the late Gubernatorial
Convention, 1 earnestly desired ami hoped,
up to the last hour of its session, that a nom
ination for Governor would be made which
would harmonize the Colquitt and anti-Col
quitt wings of the Democratic party. But
the hope proved illusive, and the people of
Georgia are now left without a nominee for
that high office.
My desire, as you know, was to issue a call
for another convention which could silence
all dissension, but I was met by two objec
tions—first, the want of authority, as the
Democratic State Executive Committee was
the constituted authority to call the people
together; and second, the want of time for
concert of action in all the counties. Your
decision, finally, was to act and request some
Democrat to consent to be a candidate, in
opposition to Governor Colquitt, and leave
the question of another convention and of a
choice between the two candidates to the
people. No man in the State regrets more
thnn I do the position in which the people
of this State arc placed by the refusal of the
majority in the late convention to nominate
a man about whom there would have been no
division or discord. But the lamentable fact
is before us, and the Democratic party must
either meet in convention and heal the breach
by nominating a man who would silence the
discord in its ranks, or the people must ac
cept a candidate, by whose acts in his offi
cial capacity, and during the late canvass
and the late convention, the division in the
party has been caused.
In reply to oour request I will say that
had I net been a delegate in the late conven
tion, and had I not taken so active a part in
maintaining what I conceive to be the rights
of the people ; their right to vote for whom
they please ; their right to freedom of speech ;
their right to rule themselves and to choose
their n' 1 fro— the whole State • ’h.Y -qht
S TERMS, $1.50 PER ANNUM.
( SI.OO For Six Months,
to judgo of the fitness or unfitness of a can
didate, and to carry out their eouviction of
duty ; I should, from oonaid* ratio ns of great
personal moment, deeliut to be a candidate.
But it is urged that tho logical sequence
for me to continue to labor in a good cause
and prosecute it to completion. I consider
the cause worthy of the ambition and patri
otism ot any Georgian. The issues involved
in this contest are of great moment to tha
State, and to every citizen of it. Their ef
fects will reach beyond, and affect for good
or evil, the lives of men in the State now in
the vigor of youth. In assuming this can
didacy I have no motive or purposo or ambi
tion beyond serving my State and in endeav
oring to instill into the minds of ilie young
men of my State who will soon wear tho
robes of otlice, the important truth that she
same circumspection and avoidance evc
*• of the appearance of evil” which should
mark their footsteps in private life should
guard their conduct in public life. If suc
cessful in this alone my reward will be full.
In conclusion it is proper that I should
state the policy I shall adopt should the peo
ple of the State call me to discharge tho
duties of Governor.
As education is the source and support of
gjpcod government, and a3 no people can bo
truly great and free who are ignorant, I
should favor a liberal provision for the edu
cation of the children of both races.
I shall oppose the 9ale of the Western and
Atlantic Railroad, as well as any attempt
that might tic made by any persons or cor
porations within or beyond the State to got
such control of it as would enable them to
use it to tiie detriment of the citizens or the
corporations of this State.
I shall endeavor in all official action to
foster the kindred relations between th+
white and colored races.
I shall advise such legislation as will Iqk
partially protect tho just results of capital
and labor.
In the matter of transportation, I shalT
seek to establish the equitable mean whicU
imposes no unjust burdens on the shipper
and secures to tho carrier a fair and reason
able return on the capital invested in his road
or other means or transportation.
I shall endeavor in every way to prevent
the repetition of the cruelties growing out of
the convict sytem of the State, which in 187d.
and 1870 were brought to light, and caused
a thrill of horror in every humane beast ia
the State. Any system which works suet*
cruelty and mortality must be radically
wrong and should be corrected.
Thanking you, gentlemen, for the confi
dence in me implied by your request, I re
main, very truly, your fellow-citiien,
T. M. Norwoodv
Judge IBack on Hancock.
THE ATTEMPT TO BASTARDIZE ORDER NO. 40
AN ELOQUENT TRIBUTE TO HANCOCK.
It has otton happened that the best thing*
of the greatest men are attributed to others,
who are wholly incapable of them. The opin
ion was iudustriously propagated and accept
ed by a great many as true that Hamilton
wrote the Farewell Address of
but the evidence is concluaira which aboant
that every word of that ijamortal pjwdkahioft
came from Washington himsalf, and Hamil
ton could not hare written it aay mare than,
he could have made a world*. Some of Jack
eon’s most characteristic papers, bearing th
full impress of his own mind, were habitually
credited to persons of far inferior ability..
When it was charged against Jefferson that,
he wroto Logan's speech he solemnly de
clared that he was unequal to such a compo
sition. lam not affecting modesty when I
claim credence of 1113' present denial for a
similar reason. I could not have written
Hancock's No. 40—not because I pretend to
be dumb or altogether unskilled in the use of
English words, but because if I had under
taken to write it the chances are ninety-nine
in a hundred that my argumentation would;
have marred its majestic simplicity and,
greatly diminished its power. When a pub
lic man, especially a military man, meets a,
grave responsibility, saying no more nor less,
than just the thing ho ought, but sa}:ing that,
with unequivocal clearness, you may be sure
he is the interpreter of his own thoughts. At
any rate tire attempt is unjust to bastardize
No. 40 by assigning to it au origin totally
different from the true one.
Why should m3' opinion be asked or vol
unteered on General Hancock as a civilian ?•
Anybody else who lias watched his life is as
good a judge as I, and there are thousands
who know him much bettor. But since the
question is propounded I will answer, sub
ject to fair correction, that 110 has in him tho
highest and best qualities of a Republican
ruler. I think his fidelity to sound princi
ples, coupled with his sound judgment, will
entitle him to rank well with the great Presi
dents of former times. I do nut compere
him with \\ ashington, for tho grandeur ef
that character is and will remain £or§v*r un
approachable, but I do eay that Washington,
if placed in his situation, would have acted
precisely as ho did. His patriotism has not
the impulsive ardor of Jackson’s, but his
fidelity to the truth, 1113 love of justice and
his scorn of wrong are quite as unmistakable.
He is not a doctrinaire like Jefferson, for his
busy life has left him no time to stud) r tho
abstract philosophy of politics, but hia prac-
tical good sense knows the right intuitively
and al<va3 ; s catches the nearest way to do it.
If he be elected, the ability of his administra
tion will inspire universal respect, and hia
moderation and magnanimity will conciliate
even Lis enemies. I have the fullest faith
that he will not only keep his oath to pre
serve, protect and defend the Constitution,
but will so carry out its provisions that th*
great objects of its framers as expressed h|
the preamble will be fully accomplished t
“To form a more perfect Union, to establish
justice, to insure domestic tranquility, to pr%-
vide for the common defense, to promote tha
general welfare and to secure tho blessing#
of liberty to ourselves and our posterity.”—
Judge Black's Paris Letter to N. Y. World.
A wag said of an egotistical writer :
“ Somebody should lake pity on his readers
and put out his I’s.”
NUMBER 13.