The banner of the South. (Augusta, Ga.) 1868-1870, September 19, 1868, Page 3, Image 3
] 10 1(1 could bo roused. Would it, Cousin ?’
Then, suddenly changing her manner, she
exclaimed: ‘‘Away! away, before I fol
]mv my impulse, and call on the servants
t 0 seize you. Oh.” she cried, her eyes
gleaming tire, as she fastened them on his
faltering face—“oh, I could see you drag
red to Jail like a felon, and witness against
you without mercy, were you not of my
hwn blood! Since it is so, 1 spare you.
but do not think that Robert will be so
merciful. The papers that you have stolen
from this room, have been missed; the
ghost’s errand is clear to me now. Away,
instantly, and never see my face again!”
As Laura stood thus, in her white dress,
her golden hair unbound, her lithe figure
raised to its full height, and her graceful,
arm outstretched, she looked like a beau
tiful angel of Justice. Richard glanced at
her, and his eyes glared like those of a
wild beast; but be saw his game was up,
and drawing his cloak around him, he
stealthily, but swiftly glided from the room
and crept down the stairs; the house door
closed softly, and we heard the clatter of
bis horse’s hoofs die away.
But Laura did not wait to hear all this,
before she released me. Her little white
lingers had a hard time with the rough
knots; hut she untied them with wonder
ful speed.
As she loosened my hands lastly, I
clasped hers within them, and in a mo
ment all was said that I had so vainly tried
to write, and all was answered that I had
so fondly hoped.
We agreed that it was best not to men
tion the night’s adventure; “for Dick’s
sake,” said Laura, and added, “I can
easily get the papers from his desk, and
no one need know it. I only suspected
him, and I don’t want Mother to know I
sat up all night waiting to hear you scream,
and ran in when I did hear your voice.”
“Oh, indeed! ” said I; “that’s the se
cret, is it? Well, I’ll promise secrecy on
that point.”
And I never did mention it before; but
yesterday, Laura told me, laughingly, that
I might write the story of how, ten years
ago, she and I laid the ghost.
What’s a Wife. — A wife (says Mr.
Lofty,) is a woman that belongs to a man.
She’s a pretty little creature, made to
tickle his fancy, his vanity, and his self
love, and to sing, laugh, and dance,
through his otherwise dull habitation.
But upon her dance, mind you, she must
see that the house is kept in order; that
the dinner is well cooked ; that the but
tons and the hose are all right, and that
nothing in the whole household economy
ever interferes with his comfort.
In short, a wife is a pleasant sort of
universal servant to her husband’s will
and pleasure—a most agreeable provis
ion made by the Creator for man’s good.
She is a compound of flowers, music, and
domestic animal—very useful and very
ornamental—all the more desirable for
her lack of mental powers ; because, were
she not in this respect so much inferior
to her lord and master, she might become
so presumptuous, as to think that a shoe
which fits one foot ought to fit the other;
that good rules work both ways; and
that just so much comfort as she gives,
she has a right to demand in return;
and just so much honor and respect as
she pays she should receive; in short,
that she is, in number and importance of
rights and r privileges, the peer of her
husband.
Thus soitli Mr. Lofty. And now hear
the response of Mr. Common Sense :
Nay; but a wife is given—neither for
a toy, nor for a servant, but lor a stead
fast friend.
She is, indeed, a fount of joy and pleas
ure, such as, to a true heart, there is not
elsewhere on earth.
bhe is the brightencr of liis house and
the wise and careful manager of her
lamily—of her family, for whatever is his
ls 'also hers ; and between wedded hearts,
the words “mine” and “thine” are impu
dence and absurdity.
Hut she is more than all that—she is
lis confidant, his adviser, his ever-sym
pathizing friend—his able and most ten
der consoler—his strength, even, when
his courage droops.
She is the voice of God’s love and corn
t'Ut to him as he toils, and struggles
through the world.
AH of this, is what a wife is, if she
answers to her Master’s ideal.
Tiik Population of Kome.— The
annual census is just completed in the
Jittj-four parishes of Rome. The city
a Abating population of 217,378 souls
—30,000 more than 1859. The popula
ti' n would soon be double, if the large
hMi.ontial swamps were cultivated.
Ihe inhabitants are classed as follows:
-9 Cardinals, 28 Patriarchs, Archbishops
and Bishops, 1.372 Prelates, Priests of
lerici ; 790 Seminarians, 2,947 Monk*
and 2,191 Nuns. There ’are furth e ;
-•>1)4 Jews, and 2,208 Jewesses, who
uve near their Synagogue, and 488 here
'Hio attend service at the Russian.
Prussian, English, American, or Pres
bvterian Chapels, situated outside of Rome,
1 ;* { h° Via Flaminia. Instruction is
gi\en to 14,067 boys, and 11,860 g’irls,
a fourth part of these it is gratui
tous.— Ex.
[For the Banner of the South.]
A Tomb and a Ruin.
Does it stand like a phantom, dark and wild,
To blacken the mirth of a fair young child ?
Or, does it stand, with its dark, grim frown,
By the dreary way-side, with moss o’ergrown,
To teach a lesson, or, to point to the stone,
That stands in the picture, so dreary and lone?
A child lies there of the sixth oeutury,
And her life was a cold sad destiny;
A false-hearted lover, and a murdered fame!
A woman’s weakness, and a mother’s shame!
Two children there are, who were laid beneath
The stone that marks that wayside heath.
There, the ghosts of the child and the mother,
Arc standing as stark in wintry weather,
As when the moon, with soft, silvery light,
Bhed its pure rays upon the summer night;
And they point to the ruin, dark and wild,
The mother one side, and the other, the child.
I was traveling on over hillside and plain,
When I heard before me a plaintive strain ;
It came with a pleading and earnest appeal,
And sunk in my heart like a silver seal ;
“ We must breathe our burthens to mortal ear,
Oh! banish, dear lady, all terror, all fear,
“What lesson does the marble teach to you,
O, passing traveller, fearless and true?
Listen and learn, and the lesson will tell,
If moral, or mind, or the mind’s deep cell,
Or, if all combined, form the Spirit's mark,
That makes mother and child stand stiff and stark.
“Thou shalt see the stone and the sculptured verse,
And from its sides the sad tale rehearse—
The talc of a love, though plighted and won,
Yet, ending in blight, and a fate undone ;
And this was the fate of both mother and child:
‘Pointever to the ruin, dark and wild.’
“Not one of the sculptured letters are lost,
And the marble liauds on the bosom crossed,
Are laid there—still, as cold and meekly sad,
As her own, on the day she was known bb dead,
Were laid, in their beauty across her breast,
Asa sign of quiet, and a long, long rest.
\
‘ ‘Turn, lady, thy thoughts to the olden time,
Whan years were numbered by century’s chime ;
The lost, the learned, and the strong,
Alike to ages of the past belong;
And I bloomed in the morn of life, like ye,
Born of the flower of Eternity.
Oh! would that my father and mother had kuown,
How sad a fate on my heart was thrown,
When they brought to my homo a Cousin fair,
With dark brown eyes, and silky hair,
And coupled him oft, iu our household ways, '
With their only child, in our childish plays.
“My heart throbbed soft, to his softened voice,
When lie said to me: ‘ Rachel, thou art my choice.’
And it ended thus, with a plighted love—
A love, which penance alouc could prove,
Was a blight to the flower that gave me birth,
And a noisome plant, on the face of earth.
“Iu that ruin, lady, I have lived, and there
My parents thought me, of all, most fair,
Till they heard, with pain, that my troth was given
To the one who, of all, they would have striven
To have me regard with a sisterly love,
Which nothing in Heaven or Earth could disprove.
“We wandered away from the laud of our birth,
To the sea—o’er the ices—far away to the North.
In Iceland, we found a sad, fugitive home,
With yokuls of ice and the blue surges foam.
And oft times wo wept, when, far over the strand,
We saw visions of home, in this fair, blooming land.
“Bull many a day did wo wander together,
In cold, and hunger, and wintry weather ;
Full many a day we journeyed iu light,
And thought it, of ail, the darkest night.
To wander along in this world of «ire,
With nought to relieve us of grief and despair.
“ ‘No cottage—no home—shall be thine,’ said my heart
‘ Till the sin of thy soul from thy side shall depart;’
And I knew, and I felt, that the doom was upon me,
Unshrived and unpitied, to droop and to die.
Too soon, alas, lady, too soon for my soul,
Came the waters of sorrow—the deep billows’ roll.
“When, coining, at last, to the downhill of life,
The condemned and the culprit were often at strife,
I earnestly tell thee, I, alone, am to blame
For all that has happened—the sin and the shame:
I would, if I could, hide my face in despair,
Nor breathe this sad record to your mortal oar.
“And this was the sentence that fell on my soul :
‘ Go to your parents’ home —there make your dole;
Breathe it over and over in some passing ear,
Till, excited by pity, they listen with care;
And tell them to teach to the child at their side,
That God, and the Church, are their proper guide.’
“But, come to the ruin, and see it with me,
It stands by the root of the old chestnut tree ;
It bears in its image a blighted look,
Since from its walls, the Virgin they took
And put her within the cloister deep,
Which stands alongside ot the citadel keep.
Come to the orchard, the grove, and the dell;
Come to the brook, which we loved so well;
Come to the bower, and come to the shade
Os the Eglantine vine, which grew in the glade:
Come to the virginal; come to the choir;
Come to the Mother; come to the Sire.
“Mv Sire was gone; and my Mother laid here;
And I, by her side, was to stand in despair;
Till, centuries past, I might lighten my load
By Confession—the seal to the Heavenly road.
And now, in the moonlight, the sunlight, the storm,
You maj no more behold me, iu my spectral form.”
A curious phenomenon recently oc
curred at St. Paul. A shower of ants
fed upon one of the streets, the sidewalk
being nearly covered with them. Some
of them had large wings, while on
others the wings were only visible by
close observation. It is supposed that
these winged ante were flying over the
city, when a change of the wind, or the
s !ght storm, drove them down upon the
treet. *
> 1 AifBIB ©F fEI
Spoilt Men.
BY' ELZEY HAY'.
That implacable woman-hater, the
Saturday Review, is down upon the sex
again, with all its usual venom, hut with
out its usual wit. Not satisfied with be
rating one class in the person of its imagin
ary “Girl of the Period, it turns against
another, and iashesspoift women as fiercely
as if there were no such things iu the world
as spoilt men—and much things
they are, and more frequent, too, than
spoilt women.
lour spoilt man, unlike the spoilt
woman, is more amiable to his own sex
than to the other, for the reason that his
narrow susceptibilities are incapable of
grappling with important affairs that
would bring him in conflict with men,
while his contracted mind occupies itself
with the small concerns of life that bring
him chiefly in conflict and collision with
women. He sets himself up as a sort of
social Juggeruaut, before whose chariot
wheels the heads of adoring mothers, sis
ters and wives must bow, grateful for the
privilege of being crushed beneath the
triumphal car of their god. He thinks all
women were made to worship him, and
will only tolerate them in proportion as
they admire and believe in him. A clevef
woman he detests as an insult to himself.
He is usually a man of small intellectual
powers (a man of enlarged views is
above spoiling) and, therefore, bitter
ly resents intellect in others, especial
ly in women.. No man ever forgives a
woman for being more clever than himself,
if he has the penetration to find it out,
but the spirit man is peculiarly intolerant
of female excellence. If “ the spirit wo
man of the mental kind is,” as our re
viewer declares, “ a horrid nuisance gen
erally,’ the spirit man of the mental kind
is ten times worse. He will suffer no one
about him to hold opinions of their own,
and to argue with him, is like speaking
.against inspiration. With him, emphat
ically, “ orthodoxy is my doxy, and heter
odoxy is your doxy”—especially in politics.
He lays down the theses in law, rostheties,
or religion, and if you presume to quote
Story, Ruskin, or Chalmers against him,
he stares at you for an audacious fool, as
it you had cited a funny novel against the
Bible.
But it is not alone in intellectual mat
ters that the spoilt man must assert his
own superiority. His tyranny descends to
the minutest concerns of every day life;
none of the details of housewifery are se
cure from his interference, and he always
interferes in (he wrong place. He scolds
his wife because nurse lets the baby cry,
quarrels with his maiden sister because
cook made milk toast for his breakfast,
instead of dry, and grumbles to mother
all day because the grocer sent a pound of
bad cheese last night. He has a thousand
whimsical theories about cooking and
will no more tolerate a palate that
differs from his own, than the men
tally spirit man will tolerate a dif
ference of opinion. I know one who will
pout a week if anybody presumes to touch
cabbage in his presence, while another of
the same stamp pronounces all eaters of
spinach to be no better than heathens and
barbarians. If the spoilt man has a fancy
for high seasoning the whole family must
suffer with dyspepsia to gratify has taste,
or if plumb pudding gives him the gout,
it must never appear on his table for the
benefit of any one else. I have seen a
man so intolerant of any dish he did not
eat that, if his wife took the liberty of
preparing it for a guest, he would snatch
it up and set it under the table. Now, I
am no advocate for woman’s rights— at
least not for the sort that Mrs. Elizabeth
Cady Staunton aud Miss Susan B. An
thony would have—but I do think every
woman has a right to be absolute mistress
of her own kitchen and pantry —yet even
here your spoilt men must assert Lis sway
—he must be prying into every nook and
corner, and is always telling his wife how
his mother used to do. Thackeray makes
living mothers-in-law a terror to husbands,
but these spoilt men make dead mother*
in iaws a terror to wives. I know a lady
who has been trying, for twelve years, to
cook potatoes for her husband, like his
mother used to have them, and I have
never yet seen a loaf of bread so perfect
that the spoilt mau would not say: “Oh,
but you should have seen the bread my
mother used to make.” Their shirts,
too, when mothers have been so
inconsiderate as to make those in
tricate garments at home, are a
standing nuisance to wives, and I have
heard of a wretch—though I am happy to
say I never knew such a one—who petu
lently tore the cuff from his sleeve be
cause the button was not sewed on exactly
as mother used to do it. This grievance
of not having things the way mother used
to do them, is very convenient to men who
must always keep a grievance on hand,
especially if the old lady happens to be
dead and gone, because then there can be
no appeal to her, and if one of her own
loaves could be resurrected and set before
him, the spoilt man would still shake his
head and say, “Ah, but you should have
seen the bread my mother used to make.”
Os course it is all very right and proper
for a man to honor the memory of his
mother, but in justice to the old lady we
must protest against his making a bore of
her.
There is nothing too trifling for the frivo
lous mind of the spoilt man to make a
nuisance of. If he has a prejudice against
this or that color, he goes into the saiks if
any one wears it in his presence. Not
content with grumbling at the milliner’s
bill —which of course all men have a right
to—he must meddle wfth the dress of his
female dependent, and even presumes to
criticise the fashions. Has he a fancy for
straight.smoothe hair, he takes it as a per
sona, injury that any woman should wear
cnmps, and if he likes short dresses, no
woman about him has a right to wear long
ones. Other people must be comtortable ex
actly in his way or not be comfortable at all;
they must enjoy themselves in his way or
not enjoy themselves at all. Il‘he is dis
posed to be silent, he thinks it preposter
ous that other people should care to talk;
if he affects the recluse, he is outraged that
others should seek the pleasure of society.
Lut the most special and universal ob
ject of spoilt men’s tyranny is the family
mail bag. Indeed, I am not sure but nearly
all men are a little spoilt in this respect,
just.by dint of always taking charge of the
family mail to and from the postoffice,
they look upon newspapers as something
invented for their own peculiar use and
convenience—something with which wo
men have no more busiuess to meddle
with than with prices current or the right
of suffrage. Even among those most
noted for courtesy and good nature, it is
the rarest thipg in the world to find one
who will, under any circumstances, offer a
newspaper to a lady before he has read it
himself., and if he does so, there is always
something in his manner which betrays
plainly enough that he does not expect her
to accept it. I once heard a lady say that
her husband—a man of fine literary taste —
who subscribed for a large number of
papers and periodicals, was so jealous of
his treasures that every day when he came
from the office he would put them in his
chair and sit on them, taking out one at
a time to read, lest his wife should get a
peep into Rome of them before him. How
ever, I have no mind to quarrel with the
men for liking to get the first look at the
papers ; it is a privilege that all women
ought cheerfully to accord them,
but I must protest against the un
reasonable monopoly that some men
make of everything they take out of the
postoffice. They carry letters addressed to
their female relations for weeks in their
pockets, where they lie forgotten till dis
covered and brought to light by the
washerwoman, or by some honest valet
who has fallen heir to his master’s old
clothes. And yet, after being convicted
lime and again of these misdemeanors,
they take it as a mortal affront if a wife or
daughter ventures to doubt the accuracy of
their memory and ask in the meekest tone,
“Have you a letter for me?” They con
sider even this legitimate question an un
warrantable interference with their preroga
tive as autocrats of the family mail-bag.
The worst of it is, they seem utterly in-'
sensible to the enormity of such offences
till someone practices the like upon them;
and then what a domestic thunderstorm is
raised if a paper should bo torn or a busi
ness letter misplaced. Men seem to think
that because women get no business letters
their correspondence cannot be of much
importance, as if stupid business were the
only thing in this world worth attending to.
As our reviewer says that women arc
spoilt by over-attention from men, so men
are generally spoilt by over-attention from
women. The very worst specimen of a
spoilt man is the only son of a widow,or the
only brother of a large family of sisters.
From living alway in a house where wo
men are at a discount, he is very apt
to contract exaggerated ideas of the
importance of men, in general, and
of himself in particular. Sisters are
naturally disposed to over-rate the merits
of their brothers, and mothers of their
sons —an estimate which the son and
brother is always ready to receiye. Where
the adoration of mother and sisters is di
vided among several, it cannot do much
harm, but when they all unite to pet and
coddle and flatter and sacrifice themselves
to one, how can he help learning to think
that all women wore made to wait on and ad
mire him ? Mothers and sisters generally
begin the spoiling of a man, and by a
piece of natural poetical justice, are aG
ways the chief victims of his selfishness.
I have known one or two spirit men who
made tolerably good husbands, but they
are always horribly exacting brothers.
Spoiling makes people selfish, but their
very selfishness sometimes expands so as
to embrace those most intimately connected
with them. A spoilt man may have a sort
of selfish affection for his wife because she
is hh wife, which leads him to consult her
pleasure as far as he can, without inter
fering with his own. For the same reason
a spoilt woman may sometimes make a
good wife. She is not so apt to make an
intolerably bad one as a spirit mau to
make an intolerable husband, because
spoilt people are fussy mainly about trifles,
and as women’s business is to deal with
trifiles, they are best not carried out of
their natural sphere by spoiling—unsexed,
as it were, and made contemptible as well
as disagreeable, like the childish men who
grow fractious at a button sewed on
awry or say bad words over a mis
placed pin. Women, undoubtedly, can
be the most aggravating of crea
tures in a small way, if they are so dis
posed, but then, as "the Saturday Review
declares, a spoilt woman Usually vents her
ill humours on her maid, while a spoilt l
man vents his upon his female relations
and scolds his wife for the fault of his valet
or the fluctuation of his stock exchange.
Besides, a man always has his office and!
club-room where he can take refuge from
the caprices of a troublesome wife, while
a woman has nothing for it but to stay at;
home and submit to the whims of an un- j
reasonable husband.
Now, I don’t say all men are spoilt (ex- |
cept, perhaps, about that little matter j
connected with the post-office); nay, upon |
the whole, I think they are very delightful J
creatures, but the more delightful they 1
are, the more is the pity that any of them
should be spoilt. A withered bay tree
ts a greater blot on the landscape than a
withered rosebush, and so is a spoilt man
a greater nuisance to society than a spoilt
womaD.
Vermont True to her Ancient Faith.
Vermont, by the election returns, gives
evidence that her vote will be cast, at the
Presidential election, for Grant and Col
ax. Kali for Vermont ! She is where
she always was, and where she ought to
Twice she voted for the elder Adams,
and his Alien and Sedition Law Admin
istration, and twice her vote was cast
against Mr. Jefferson.
During the entire war of 1812, and
the discussion that led to it, Vermont,
true to her faith, took the part of Eng
land against the United States, and cast
her electoral vote against Madison and the
war. When Mr. Monroe had a com
petitor, the vote of Vermont was cast for
Rufus King, the bitterest of Federal
leaders.
Vermont voted twice for John Quincy
Adams for President against General
Jackson. In 183*2, the State cast her
vote for the anti-Masonic candidate, be
cause Henry Clay happened to be a
Mason.
\ erinonthas never given a Democratic
vote, and, in all human probability, never
will. The isms of New England are “to
the manner born” of Vermont, and, verily,
the people cling to them until displaced
by anew one, for, except being Demo
cratic, they are everything by starts, and
nothing long. Like the Atheist with*the
Bible, the Vermonter has a terrible
hatred of Democracy —Columbus ( O.)
Statesman, Sept. 9 th.
A Republican State. —Ostensibly,
and only ostensibly, the reconstruction
measures were intended to afford the
Southern States Republican forms of
Government. Here is the sort of Re
publican Government given to Arkansas :
“Memphis, September 4. The Ava
lanche's Little Rock special to-day says
that Governor Clayton, of Arkansas, has
prepared instructions for his Registers for
Registration, now about to commence.
He says that, among these powers, the
duties of each Registration Board is to
reject any one whom the Registrars
think not entitled to register, even though
the applicant has already taken the oath;
to make arrests, 'find call upon Sheriffs for
a sufficient number of armed men to assist
him, and if not furnished them, to call
upon the commanding officer of any
troops of the State guard, (which means
Negro militia), who is directed to furnish
promptly such aid. The applicant for
registration is also required to prove his
innocence by evidence satisfactory to the
Registrar that he lias not been guilty of a
number of specified acts during a sum of
years, one of which is that he did not
sympathize with the rebellion. If he
fails to establish this, he cannot register,
his oath to the contrary notwithstanding,
unless he voted for the present Constitu
tion. Another is, to reject any one who
has taken the franchise oath, if the
Registrar is satisfied, or thinks he ought
not to be registered; and, before being
allowed to register, the applicant must
subscribe to an oath that lie accepts the
civil and political equality of all men, and
agrees not to attempt to make any
changes.
“Ten days before the election, the
Boards of Registration will meet in each
county, with power, upon their own
knowledge or information, to strike from
the list the names of voters thev consider
disqualified by the registration law. The
Courts are forbidden to issue any manda
mus,or other process against Registers.”
This is the Radicals’ conception <4 a
'model Republic, for they made it. and
denounce Blair as a revolutionist for do
manding its overthrow. We doubt if a
respectable Radical can read the above,
and not, in his secret soul, applaud Blair s
declaration. —Paducah Kentuckian.
Moßft Repudiatoßs or Repurlican*
ism.— A correspondent, writing from
Fronesta, Forest comity, Pa., under
date August 31, informs the Cleveland
Plain Dealer that Col. P. I). Thomas, a
life-long Republican ; Col. J. F. Gaul,
who commanded one of the Pennsylvania
Reserve Corps during the late war, and
hitherto a strong Republican; and Lt. D.
W. Clark, late Quartermaster of the 83d
Pennsylvania Volunteers, and since the
war an active member of the Republi
can party, have come out for Seymour
an<l Blair.
And Still Another. —Major Gen.
E. 1). Keys is stumping California for
Seymour and Blair. General Keys was
one of Mr. Lincoln’s warmest partisans,
and one of the oldest Major Generals in
the Army of the Potomac. He says he
will vote as lie fought--for the preserva
tion of the Union, and Constitutional
Liberty.— Col. (O.) Statesman, Sept. 9.
3