Below is the OCR text representation for this newspapers page.

Cattstitutianalist so lU-ptthlir.! B” JAMBS OARDITBR. | Tniß „ ON mointosh-steekt, door f<o n run morth-wkst corner of broad-street. TER MS * <“ P a 'd in advance)... .per annum.. $8 00 W < f y „ llf^ aid H nadV! r UCe) P er annum..s 00 »> delay (if paid m advance) per annum.. 2 00 Mr. Marcy’a Letter. [concluded.] It is not contended that this initiatory step in the process of naturalization invested him with all the civil rights of an American citizen • but it is sufficient for all the purposes of this case to show that he was clothed with an American nationality ; and in virtue thereof the Govern ment of the United States was authorized to extend to him its protection at home and abroad Mr. Hulsemann, as the undersigned believes, tails into a great error—an error fatal to some of his most important conclusions—by assuming that a nation can properly extend its protection only to native-born or naturalized citizens, i his is not the doctrine of international law, nor is the practice of nations circumscribed within such narrow limits. This law does not, as has been before remarked, complicate ques tions of this nature by respect for municipal codes. In relation to this subject it has clear and distinct rules of its own. it gives the na tional character ot the country not only to na tive-born and naturalized citizens, but to all residents in it who are there with or even with out an intention to become citizens, provided they have a domicil therein. Foreigners may, and often do, acquire a domicil in a country, even though they have entered it with the avowed intention not to become naturalized cit izens, but to return to their native land at some remote and uncertain period; and whenever they acquire a domicil international law at once impresses upon them the national character of the country of that d< micil. It is a maxim of international law that domicil confers a national character; it does not allow any one who has a domicil to decline the national character thus conterred; it forces it upon him, often very much against his will and to his great detriment. International law looks only to the national character in determining what country has the right to protect. If a person goes from this country abroad with the nationality of the United States, tt is law enjoins upon other na tions to respect him, in regard to protection, as an American citizen. It concedes to every country the right to protect any and all who may be clothed with its nationality. These are important principles in their bearings upon the questions presei.ted in Mr. Hulsemann’s note, and are too obvious to be contested; but, as they are opposed to some of the positions taken by Austria, the undersigned deems it respectful in such a case to sustain them by reference to authorities: The position is a clear one that, if a person goes into a foreign country and engages in trade there, be is, by the law of nations, to be consid ered a merchant of that country, and a subject for all civil purposes, whether that country be hos tile or neutral.”—l Kent Com , 75. Again: The same authority says that— “ In the law ol nations, as to Europe, the rule is that rnen take their national character from the general character of the country in which they reside.”—lbid, 78. It Koszta ever had a domicil in the United States, he was in virtue thereof invested with the nationality ot this country, and in this char acter continued as long as that domicil was re tained. There are cases in w hich i is difficult to settle the question of domicil; but that ol Koszta is not one of them. The mo3t approved definitions of a domicil are the following : k ' A residence at a particular place, accompa nied with positive o. presumptive proof of con tinuing there for an unlimited time.”— (i Bin ney s Reports, 349 ) If it sufficiently appear that the intention of removing was to make a permanent settlement for an indefinite time, the light ol domicil is acquired by s. residence of a few days”—(The Venus, 8 Conch, 279 ) “ Vattel has defined domicil to be a fixed lesi dence in any place, wirh an intention of always staying there. But this is not an accurate state ment. It would be more correct to say that that place is properly the domicil ol a person in which his habitation is fixed, without any pres ent intention of removing therefrom.”—(Story’s Con ot Laws, § 43.) ** A person who removes to a foreign country, settles him-elf there, and engages in the trade ot the country, furnishes by these acts such evidence of an intention peima- Hently to reside there as *o stamp him with thf national character of the State where be re sides”— (Tin. Venus.B Cranch,279 ) Ap >ly thes principles to the case under con sideration. nod the inevitabe result is tbai Kosz'a had a domicil in the United States. Hr came to and resided in this country one year anc eleven months. He came here with the inten tion of making it his future This inten tion was manifested in several ways, but mosl significantly by bis solemn declaration upon oath. There can be no better evidence of his design ot making the United States his future home than such a declaration ; and to this kind of evidence of the intention, the indispensable element of true domicil, civilians have always attached importance. (Phillimore, § 188) In the case ol Koszta we have ail that is required to prove he had a domicil in the United States— the concurrence of an actual residence with the intention to make this country his future home. The establishment of his domicil here invested him with the national character of this country, and with that character be acquired the right to claim protection from the United States, and they had t'.e right to extend it to him as long as that character continued. The next question is, was Koszta clothed with that character when he was kidnapped in the streets of Smyrna, and imprisoned on board of the Austrian brig-of-war Huszar? The na tional character acquired by residence remains as long as the domicil continues, and that con tinues not only as long as the domiciled person - continues in the country of his residence, but until he acquires a new domicil. The law as to the continuance and change of a domicil is clearly stated in the following quotation from an eminent jurist: “ However, in many cases actual residence is not indi pensable to retain a domicil after it is once acquired ; but it is. retained, animo tolo by the mere intention not to change it, or to adopt another, if, therefore, a person leaves his home for temporary purposes, but with an intention to return to it. this change of place is not in law a change of domicil. Thus, if a person should go on a voyage to sea, or to a foreign country, for health or for pleasure, or for business of a tempo porary nature, with an intention to return, such a transitory residence would not constitute a new domicil, or amount to an abandonment of the old one ; for it is not the mere act of inhabi tancy in a place which makes it the domicil, out it is the fact coupled with the intention of re maining there, animo manendi” —(Story’s Con. of Laws, 4 44.) * At the very last session of the Supreme Court of the United States a case came up for adjudica tion presenting a question as to the domicil of Gen. Kosciusco at the time of his death. The decision, which was concurred in by all the judges on the bench, fully sustains the correct ness of the foregoing propositions in regard to domicil, particularly the two most important in Koszta s case: first, that he acquired a domicil in the United States ; and, second, that he did not lose it by his absence in Turkey.—(l4 Howard’s .Reports S. C. V. S., 400 ) As to the national character, according to the law of nations, depends upon the domicil, it re mains as long as tbe domicil is retained, and is changed with it. Koszta was, therefore, vested with the nationality of an American citizen at Smyrna, it be, in contemplation of law, had a docnicil in the United States. Tne authorities already refei red to show that, to lose a domic,l when once obtained, the domiciled person must leave the country of his residence with the in tention to abandon that residence, and must ac quire a domicil in another. Both of these facts are necessary to affect a change of dornicil; but neither of them exists in Koszta’s case. The facts show that he was only temporarily absent from this country on private busine-s, with no intention of remaining permanently in Turkey, but, on the contrary, was at the time of his seiz ure awai’ing an opportunity to return to the United States. Whenever, by the operation of the law of na tions, an individual becomes clothed with our national character, be he a native-born or na turalized citizen, an exile driven flora bis early jjome by political oppression, or an emigrant enticed from it by the hopes of a better fortune ! ior himself and his posterity, he can claim the protection of this Government, and it may re spond to that claim without being obliged to ex plain its conduct to any foreign Power; for it is its duty to make its nationality respected by tbei n b*'° n 8 res P ec * ed * n every quarter of 1 his right to protect persons having a domicil, though not native born or naturalized citizens, rests on the firm foundation of justice, and the claim to be protected is earned by considerations which the protecting power is not at liberty to disregard. Such domiciled citizen pays the same price for his protection as native born or natu ralized citizens pay for them. He is under the l»onds of allegiance to the country of his resi dence. and if he breaks them incurs the same penalties; he owes the same obedience to the civil laws, and must discharge the duties they impose on him ; his property is in the same way and to the same extent as theirs liable to contri bute to the support of the Government. In war he shares equally with them in the calamities which may belall the country ; his services may be required for its defence; his life may be per illed and sacrificed in maintaining its rights and vindicating its honor. In nearly all respects his and their condition as to the duties and burdens of Government are undistinguishable; and what reasons can be given why, so far at least as re gards protection to person and projierty abroad as well as at borne, his rights should not be co extensive with the rights of native born or nat uralized citizens ? By the law of nations they have the same nationality ; and what right has any foreign power, tor the purpose of making distinction between them, to look behind the character given them by that code which regu lates national intercourse? When the law of na tions determines the nationality of any man, foreign Governments are bound to respect its decision They would have no cause to complain if the protecting power should stand upon its extreme rights in all cases ; but that power, in discharg ing its duties of protection, may, for sufficient reasons, have some regard for the civil distinc tions which its own laws make between the different classes of persons to whom it has the right, under international law, to extend its pro tection. It will naturally watch with more care and may act with more vigor in behalf of na tive bom and naturalized citizens than in behalf of those who, though clothed with its nationali ty, have not been so permanently incorporated into its political community. Giving effect to these well established princi ples and applying them to the facts in the case, the result is. that Koszta acquired while in the United States their national character, that he retained that charactei when he was seized at Smyrna, and that he had a right to be respected as such while there by Austria and every other foreign power. The right of a nation to protect and require others to respect, at home and abroad, all who are clothed with its nationality, is no new doctiine now for the first time brought into operation by the United States. It is com mon to all nations, and has had the sanction of their practice for ages: but it is new that at this late period, when the United States a-sert a claim to it as a common inheritance, it should at once be discovered that it is a doctrine fraught with danger, and likely to compromit the peace ot the world. The United States see no cause lor alarm ; no reason for renouncing for them selves what others have so long and so harmless ly enjoyed. There may be a reluctance in some quarters to adopt the views herein presented relative to the doctrine of domicil and consequent nationali ty, lest the practical assertion of it might in some instances give a right of protection to those who do not deserve it. Fears are entertained that this doctrine offers a facility for acquiring a na tional character which will lead to alarming abuses ; *hat under the shadow of it political agitatois, intent U|>on disturbing the repose of their own or other countries, might come to the United States with a view to acquire a claim to their protection, and then to return to their for mer scenes ot action to carry on, under a chang ed national character, their ulterior designs with greater security and better success. This appre hension is believed to be wholly unfounded. The first distinct act done by them towards the accomplishment of these designs would disclose their iraudulent purpose in coming to and seek ing a domicil in this country. Such a develop ! ment would effectually disprove the tact that : they acquired a domicil here, and with it our na i tionality. Without that nationality, they could not be considered as standing under the protect ing arm ot the United States, and consequently could have no right to claim, and no reason to expect, it would be exerted in their defence. . Their fraudulent intent would defeat all they could hope to gain by a residence in this roun try, and by insincerely professing to make it their home. The intention entertained in good faith to make it such a home would be wanting, and without such an intention neither domicil nor nationality can be acquired. This conside tation should dispel ail suspicions that this doc trine as to nationality ami protection will not be as safely used and as well guarded from abuse by the United States as it has been in times past, or may be in the future, by any other sovereign power. There is nothing in the doctrine herein maintained, or in the history of this government to awaken the slightest apprehension that it is in any way inclined to extend the shield of pro tection over adventurers or seditious propagand ists who may go from this to other countries to engage in enterprises designed to interfere with their politioal institutions or disturb their inter nal quiet. The liberal policy of the United States in regard to receiving immigrants from all nations and extending to them the advantages of their free institutions, makes it an act of jus tice ou their part to maintain the right of nation al protection to the full extent authorized by the law of nations, and to resist with firmness any attempt to impose new restrictions upon it. There is another view of this case which pla ces the conduct of the agents of this Government at Smyrna upon equally defensible giounds. The American Consul there and the American Lega tion at Constantinople acted with great caution in relation to Koszta’s claim to be regarded as entitled to the protection of this Government. As his naturalization had not been perfected they hesitated at first to receive him under their protection ; but the facts show that they ultimate- I*y y‘elded to his application. He received from each a Uzkereh —in effect a certificate—that the ! P ers °n to whom it is given is cared for, and re ! ceived under the protection of the Government | whose agent has granted it. . By the laws of Turkey and other Eastern na tions the consulates therein may receive under their protection strangers and sojourners whose w th‘°tt S ° Cia snanners5 nanners do not assimilate with the religion and manners of those countries. Ihe persons thus received become thereby in vested with the nationality of the protecting consulate. These consulates, and other European establishments in the East, are in the constant I habit of opening their doors for the reeettion of such inmates, who are received irrespective of the country of their birth or allegiance. It is not uncommon for them to nave a large number of such proteges. International law Recognises and sanctions the rights acquiesced by this” con nexion. ‘"ln the law of nations as to Europe, the rule is, that men take their national character from the' general character of the country in which they reside ; and this rule applies equally to America. But in Asia and Africa and immiscible character is kept up, and Europeans tiading under the pro tection of a factory take their national character from the establishment under which they live and trade. This rule applies to those parts of the world from obvious reasons of policy, be cause foreigners are not admmitted there, as in Europe ‘and the western part of the world,” into the general body and mass of the society of the nation, but 1 hey continue strangers and sojour ners, not acquiring any national character under the genera! sovereignty of the country.”—(l. Kent’s Cam., 78-’9.) The Lords of Appeals in this High Court ot Admiralty in England decided in 1784 that a merchant carrying on trade at Smyrna, under the protection ot a Dutch consul, as to be con sidered a Dutchman as his national character (Wheaton’s Inter. Law, 384., 3 Rob. Adm. Re ports, 12 ) This decision has been examined and approved by the eminent jurists who have since written treatises on international law. According to the principle estaulished in this case, Koszta was invested with the nationality of the United States, if he had it not before, the moment was under the protection of the American Consul at Smyrna and the American legislation ot Constantinople. That he was so received is established by the tezkereh they gave him and the efforts they made for his release, j The Cbaige d Affairs ad interim of the U. States at Constantinople, in a letter of the 29th of June, addressed to the imperial Internuncio, states: It was on presenting this declaration of allegiance j to the consulate of the United States of America at Smyrna and to this legation that the said Koszta was furnished with a tezkereh to come to Constantinople and to return to Smyrna, wheuce he was to start for New York. Since his arrival in Turkey he has resided under the protection of my Government, and it is a pleasure to me to be able to state that his conduct has always been irreproachable.” Having been received under the protection of these American establishments, he had thereby acquired, according to the law of nations, their nationality, and when wronged and outraged as he was, they might interpose for his liberation, and Capt. Ingraham had a right to co-operate with them for the accomplishment of that ob ject. Ihe exceptions taken to the manner of that co-operation remain to be considered. in relation to the deportment of the American agents towards Mr. Weckbecker, the Austrian Consul General, the undersigfied cannot conceive that there can be any ground of complaint. Noth ing done to or with him by Mr. Offiey, our Con sul at Smyrna, can possibly imply disrespect to the Emperor of Austria. Neither in his private character nor as a functionary of the Austrian Government did Mr. Weckbecker take an open or an avowed part in the opening scene of the outrage. His agency in that affair at its com mencement was clandestine. This course im plied a consciousness on his part that the act was indefensible. The fact that he sought the aid of the civil authority of Turkey to get Koszta into his possession proves that he knew the mode he resorted to for that purpose was illegal. The application of Mr. Offiey to him to assist in and consent to Koszta’s release was certainly no of fence, and implied no disrespect either to him or his Government. The appeal of Mr. Biown to Capt. Ingraham to interpose for the liberation of Koszta, and his advice to effect it in the way it was done, must be regarded not only as proper but praiseworthy acts, provided Capt. Ingraham’s conduct can be vindicated. The justification of Capt. Ingraham will consequently exonerate Mr. Brown from ail censure. If Capt. Ingraham’s course was right, Mr. Brown’s cannot be wrong. The com mander of the St. Louis was placed in a truly embarrassing position. Charged with the pro tection of the persons and property ot those who had a right to the protection of his Government, it was at the same time no less his imperative duty to respect the authorities of all countries in friendly relations with his own. After anxiously considering the case presented to him at Smyrna, he determined that he ought to effect the release of Koszta, and, unavoidable, resort to force to ac complish it. It has excited some surprise here that, after a consideration of the circumstances, an impression should be entertained in any quarter that Capt. Ingraham either committed or mediated hostility towards Austria on that occasion. In passing upon his conduct it is necessary to keep in view the conclusions established, as the udersigned believes, in the preceeding remarks : for he, with out doubt, acted upon precisely the same conclu sions. He believed that Koszta had been seized without authority, that he was illegally impri soned, and that he ought at once to be set at liberty. The first aggressive act in this case was the seizure of Koszta at Smyrna, committed by the piocurement of the Austrian functionaries ; the first improper use of a national ship, the impri sonment of Koszta therein, was made by the commander of the Austrian brig Huszar. That ship was converted into a prison for the illegal detention of a person clothed with the nationali ty of the United States, and consequently en titled to their protection. If Austria upholds, as it appears she does, the conduct of the com mander of the Huszar, she is in tact the first ag gressor. This act of the commander of the Hus zar led to the series of other acts which consti tute the ground of complaint against the United States, l'he alleged authority of Austria under treaties being set aside, no one would have ques tioned Capt. Ingraham’s right, had he been pre sent, to arrest the proceeding of the kidnappers in the streets ot Smyrna, and rescue Koszta from their hands. They were acting without and against the civil authority of the place; they were committing an atrocious outrage upon a person invested with the nationality of the United States. If he could have properly inter lered in the first stage of this lawless transaction, he might do so in the last. The act was, in all its stages, a continuous wrong, and the character of the actors, though there was a succession of persons, was the same—they were all wrong doers; and if they chanced to have the posses sion of a national ship, and converted it into a prison for the purpose of consummating this wrong, that ship, thus desecrated, was not en titled to the privileges of a sanctuary. Those who had the right to claim and the jiower to release the prisoner illegally confined therein might treat it as a prison, and while it was de graded to such an igi.oole puipose might lorget, and be excused tor loigetting, that it was a na tional ship. There is a consideration probably not brought to the notice of Austria, and not sufficiently re garded by others, which places the acts of Capt. Ingraham in a true light, and repels the infer ence of intended hostile demonstrations towards Austria. It was the understanding of the par ties that Koszta should be retained at Smyrna while the question of his nationality was pend ing. Capt. Ingraham received satisfactory evi dence of a design, on the part of the Austrian functionaries at Smyrna and Constantinople, to disregard this arrangemeut and remove him clandestinely from the Huszar on board of a steamer, tor the purpose of takingjhira to Trieste. The information was such as did cot permit Capt, Ingraham to doubt that the commander of the Huszar concurred in this design, and intend ed to aid in carrying it into effect. By this evi dence of the want of good faith on the part of the Austrian functionaries, in which the Capt. of the Hu-zar was implicated, the Captain of the St. Louis was placed in the perplexing alter native of surrendering the captive, without fur ther efforts, to the sad fate which awaited him, or to demand his immediate release, and in case of refusal to enforce it. The Government of the United States exceedingly regrets that he was reduced to this painful alternative; but it cannot find, after a full consideration of al! the circum stances, any good reason for disapproving the course he pursued. It is not just to Capt. Ingra ham to look at the affair as it was at the precise point ol time when the demand for the releaso of Koszta was made. I'he antecedent events qualify and legalize the act. The Austrian functionaries had obtained the possession of the person of Koszta, not i,i a fair or allowable way, but by violating the civil laws of Turkey arid the rights of humanity. Under these circum stances their custody of him was entitled to no respect lrom the agent of the Government w ich, by virtue of his nationality, had aright to pro tect him. Had all the circumstances been as they were, except a change of place—instead of being taken from the territory of the Ottoman Porte, had he been taken from that of the Uni ted States, could a question have been raised as to the propriety of Capt. Ingraham’s conduct? If the conclusions heretofore arrived at are cor rect, the Austrian agents had no more right to take Koszta from the soil of the Turkish domin ions than from the territory of the United States, and Capt. Ingraham had the same right ,° et P ar , ld , enforce his release as he would hav* had if Koszta had been taken from Ameri can soil and incarcerated in a national vessel ot the Austnan Kmperor. I n this question, con the nlaci of H° Umted States and Austria, the rCfn transa< | tlon » immaterial, unless the Austrian municipal laws extended over it. partkof* Mr^Hids y ‘ elds , a assent that part ol Mr. Hulsemann’s note relative to the war making power The doctrine contained in it is sound and well sustained by most approved au honties; but (the undersigned has not been able to discover its applicability to the case un der consideration. The people of the United States, m organizing their Government, have been careful to impose more restrictions upon that power than any of the nations of Europe and it cannot be admitted that these nations have had any occasion to reprove this Govern ment for its abuse. It has as deep an interest and as anxious a desire to maintain international relations of friendship and peace as any of the Europeeti Powers, and will do as much as any of them for public tranquility. The rules tor its own guidence, and tor the conduct of its agents abroad, have that end specially in view. On entering upon the duties of his office the President announced the policy which would be observed by this Government in its foreign in tercourse : " We have nothing in our history or position to invite aggression ; we have every * n = to us to the cultivation of relations o peace and amity with all nations. Purposes, er e ore, at once just and pacific, will be signi inirc marked ,n th** conduct of our foreign af > aVf < [tS V eed be no apprehensions of a departure from this course In pursuance of this policy the agents ot this Government abroad are under instructions to respect the rights of all nations ; and any de viation from that course would be promptly dis avowed, and proper reparation made for any in jury or insult which they might offer to a friend ly Power The application made by Austria to the prin cipal Powers of Europe, to warn and admonish the United States in regard to the conduct of their agents on the occasion before-mentioned, implies that this Government has adopted and is acting upon some principle hitherto unknown to the law of nations and dangerous to public tran quillity. The communications to the Govern ment in compliance with this appeal, though re spectfully made and doubtless well intended, im ply a distrust of its good faith and fair inten tions. The undersigned is confident that, after due consideration of the views here taken of the af fair at Smyrna, those Powers which have been so prompt to censure will be equally prompt to correct any precipitate judgment they may have formed in regard to it. He indulges the belief that after a full and lair examination—not mere ly of a detached fact but of the whole series of facts—they will be abundantly satisfied that the agents of this Government in that transac tion have respected international law, and in no particular transgressed the restrictions it im poses. The vindication of these agents is not placed upon any principle new to the international code or unknown in the practice of enlightened nations. These nations do not hesitate, in the exercise of the right of protection, to extend it to |persoris (not always subjects according to their municipal laws) who are clothed with their nationality; and in some instances they have carried this right of protection to limits which this Government would not venture, because it would not feel justified to approach; nor have any of these nations been disposed to abandon the ex ercise of this right from a timid apprehension that it might possibly bring them into an occa sional collision with other Powers. Is there any thing in the character or condi tion of this Government which restricts it in the use of this right—-a common inheritance to all —within narrower limit than are allowed to other? In relation to international rights, the United States ask no more than has been conce ded to others, and will not be contented with less. They put forth no new principles, but claim the full benefit of those which are estab lished. Before closing this communication, the under signed will briefly notice the complaint of Aus tria againt Capt. Ingraham for violating the neu tral soil of the Ottoman Empire. The right of I Austria to call the United States to an account I for the acts of their agents affecting the sovereign | territorial right of Turkey is not perceived, and they do not acknowledge her right to require any explanation. If any thing was done at Smyrna in deroga tion of the sovereignty of Turkey, this Govern ment will give satisfactory explanation to the Sultan when he shall demand it, and it has in structed its Minister resident to make this known to him. He is the judge, and the only rightful judge, in this affair, and the injured par ty, too. He has investigated its meiits, pro nounced judgment against Austria, and acquitted the United States; yet, strange as it is, Austria has called the United States to an account tor violating the sovereign territorial rights of the Emperor of Turkey. The conclusions at which the President has arrived, after a full examination of the transac tion at Smyrna, and a respectful consideration of the views ot the Austrian Government thereon, as presented in Mr. Hjlsemann’s note, are, that Koszta, when seized and imprisoned, was inves ted with the nationality of the United States, and they had, therefore, the right, if they chose to exercise it, to extend their protection to him ; that from international law—the only law which can be rightfully appealed to for rules of action in this case—Austria could derive no authority to obstruct or interfere with the United States in the exercise of this right in effecting the libera tion ot Koszta; and that Capt. Ingraham’s inter position tor his release was, under the peculiar and ext,aordinary circumstances of the c|se, right and proper. These conclusions indicate to Mr. Hulsemann , the answer whicti the under-igned is instructed by the President to make to the Emperor of Austria totne demands presented in Mr. Hulse mann’s note. [ The President does not see sufficient cause for disavowing the acts of the American agents which are complained of by Austria. Her i claim for satisfaction on that account has been carefully considered and is respectfully declined. Being convinced that the seizure and impri > son merit ol Koszta were illegal and unjuslifia i ble, the President also declines to give his con sent to his deliveiy to the Consul General of , i Austria at Smyrna; but, after a full examination ; °f the case, as herein presented, he has instructed j Hie undersigned to communicate to Mr. Hulse ; rnann his confident expectation that the Empe ror ot Austria will take the prop«-r measures to cause Martin Koszta to be restored to the same condition he was in before he was seeized in the : streets of Smyrna on the 21st of J une last. The undersigned avails himself of this occa sion to renew to Mr. Hulsemann the assurance of his high consideration. W. JL. Marcv, I Telegraphed for the Baltimore Swn.J Arrival of the Steamer Baltic. The Eastern Question. —No change what ever had occurred in the aspect of the Eastern question fence tbe sailing of ttie America The Vienna Conference was still in session, attempt ing to sooth difficulties. It was reported that a new modification, conciliatory both to Russia and lurkey, would be made, but it was feared in the meantime that the opposing armies might come in collision. The Servian Charge had notified the Porte that in the event of war Servia would remain neutral. The King of Prussia had concluded not to meet the Emperors of Austria and Russia at OJmutz. The Paris Pays states that the French gov ernment entertains confident hopes that the Turkish difficulty will be settled without an ap peal to arms. The Patrie adds that Russia will not, under any circumstances, commence hos tilities. The definite decision of Turkey cannot be known in England before the first or second week in October. Egypt. Ihe Pacha of Egypt has sent Kouch oy Bey as commissioner to the New York Ex hibition. India and the East.— The overland mail Irom India brings intelligence that the U. S. ex pedition, comprising the Susquehanna, Prince ton, I lymouth, and Saratogaj had sailed on July 3d from Shanghai lor Japan, followed by two Russian frigates. The Susquehaua and Saratoga had touched at several islands and distributed live stock. On the Island of Bonian the com modore found European settlers, and purchased ten acres of land and a fine harbor, suitable for a coal depot. The China revolution was extending, but no decisive action was reported. T range,— Nothing new had transpired in f rance.— Ihe increased activity in the Navy i ard indicated the critical condition of Eastern affairs. The movement in breadstuff's continued, and prices were advancing. i Austria— l be Hungarian regalia were to be lodged in the Vienna Museum. Spain.— Letters from Madrid say that another Ministerial crisis is close at hand. The propriety of deposing the Queen was freely discussed in private political circles. England.— Nothing new had transpired. The cholera was rapidly spreading. Markets.— Liverpool, Sept. 21.— Cotton was as dull as ever, at prices further favoring uyers. Qualities below low middlings were ?‘ m n °nn “ n f ale “ ble - .Sales of the three days only inrfHv b f®’ °l hlch s P ecu fotors took nothing and exporters 2,500 bales. Breadstuff!—The market for breadstuff's con mues animated at a further advance of 3d on wheat, and Is per bbl. on flour. Corn was in emarid at an advance. The quotations vary in e diffeient circulars, but the following gives a fair average : White corn 35 a 365; white wheat Os a 9s sd; red and mixed 8s 5d a 8s lid; West ern Canal flour 3 Is 6d a 32s 6d; Philadelphia and Baltimore 32s 6d a 33s 6d; Ohio 33s 6d a 34s 6d, the latter lor choice. London Money Market— The funds have been Or *sols cfosed at 95 J a 95J for money, und .95* a 95 2 for account. Money tight, but plenty tor legitimate business. London Produce Market —Coffee is in fair de mand at unchanged rates. Rice firm at full rates. 1 allow quiet at 54s 3d a 54s 6d. Tea more assive at full rates. Scotch Pig Iron 63s a 63s bd per ton. Manchester Market.—— Trade at Manchester was dull and prices of goods and yarns easier; stocks however do not accumulate, anil holders are not pressing. The difficulties with the operatives continue. Havre, Sept. 19 th. —The Arabia’s advices have been telegraphed, anil Cotton is more active at unchanged rates. Sales to-day of 1,000 bales Flour had recovered from the temporary decline, and it is now quoted 44 francs. Sales to-day of 4,000 bbls. at that prfce. Very Latest by Telegraph. UNEXPECTED ATTITUDE OF AUSTRIA. Paris, Sept. 20th, P. M.—A telegraphic dis patch from Vienna announces that Austria had declared that circumstances will no longer permit her to act with the other powers. Instructions had been forwarded to M. l)e Brack, the Austrian Minister, to assure the Sultan that he must ac cept the first Vienna note without any modifica tion. Constantinople dates of the 7th state that the Egyptian troops had been shipped off to Varna and Shumla. Mr. Jackson, the American Minister, had ar rived at Vienna, aud would present his creden tials to the Emperor of Austria at Olmutz. The harvest in Brittany is favorable. 4he Bourse, which was better on Saturday and Monday, has fallen to-day. The three’s closed at 77r. 10 c., four and a half, 1011. 75c. A terrible accident has occurred on the Paris and Bordeaux railroad. Five persons were kill ed and many wounded. Three engines were smashed to pieces. t G~ FRIDAY MORNING, OCTOBER 7. State Agricultural Fair. We take pleasure in stating that the Execu tive Committee of the State Fair, hearing that the Hon. Edward Eevrett, is or will soon be in Nashville, Tenn., to deliver an Agricultural Ad dress there, have invited him to be present at Augusta at the approaching Fair, and to address the people. We sincerely hope it may soon be in our power to announce his arrival among us. He is one of America’s most distinguished and patriotic sons, and deserves a cordial welcome to Georgia. It is rumored that the British parliament will be called together again in November for a short time, and the reason assigned is, that Ministers are anxious to get through the preliminary busi ness, so that the new Reform Bill may be intro duced immediately on the re-assembling of both houses for the regular session in February ; and it is also stated that, should the legislature agree to the proposal fora new and extended franchise, there will be a dissolution of parliament at the close of the ensuing session. The Doar Coal and Mining Company of \ irginia, it is stated, has found another vein on their land in Augusta county, measuring 8 6-12 feet thick, besides one that measures 14 and another 6 teet. The company, which has a capi tal of $1,000,000, is managed by New Yorkers and Virginians, and they claim that they will be able to deliver coal in the Baltimore market at $3 per ton. The distance by railroad, to their coal field, miles. City Mortality —ln New York, last week, there were 396 deaths, being 52 less than the week before; 55 were from consumption, 10 from typhus fever, and 32 from dysentery; 226 were under ten yers, age. In Boston, the number of deaths were 110, or 2 less than the week pre vious; 17 died of dysentery, and only 2 of fevers. There w’ere 198 deaths in Philadelphia last week; of yellow fever 7, malignant fever 6, other fevers 23, dysentery 16. We learn from the Southern Presbyterian that the Rev. C. C. Jones, D. D., has, in consequence of bad health, retired from the office of Corres ponding Secretary of the Board of Domestic Missions, and that on the 26th ult., the Board elected the Rev. G. W. Musgrave. D. D., in his place. Premium for Prize Cotton.— The merchants of emphis have presented Col. John Pope, of that county, with a splendid silver salver, two silver candlesticks, and a beautitul mantled clock ; and vase, costing in all SIOO, being the amoun 4, ! of a prize they had offered for the best bale of Memphis cotton exhibited at the Crystal Palace Fair in New York. The Suit Against Col. Benton for Slan der. Ihe trial ot the suit for alledged slander? brought by Judge Birch against Col. Benton, was commenced at Independence, Mo., on the 26th ult. Ihe question whether defendent was a resident or non-resident of the State was at tempted to be submitted to the jury, but the judge decided that that question had been waived by the defendant, and the trial proceeded. \ Election Returns. 1 COLUMBIA COUNTY. | For Senator. —Stovall, 350: Bealle, 274. For Representatives. —Wilson 372 ; Barnes ' 375 ; L. D. Hays 145. BULLOCH COUNTY. For Senator. —Cone, no opposition. For Representatives. —McLean 234; Hagin For Judge. Henry 205; Fleming 105: De- Lyon 44. For Brigadier General— Jones 12 ; Lawson 11 ; Hayrie 287. BALDWIN COUNTY. For Judge. —Hardeman 548 ; Reese 45. For Senator— Stubbs 293 ; Brown 333. For Representatives —McComb 330 ; Butts 292. HALL COUNTY. For Judge—Jackson 710; Dougherty 385. For Senator— Dunagan 723 ; Simmons 380. For Representatives. — Headen 653 ; Waters 454. PUTNAM COUNTY. Senator. —Griggs 374. Representatives. —Dawson 303 ; Calloway 318 • Gorley 282 ; Carter 264. Judge. —Hardeman 491 ; Reese 91. NEWTON COUNTY. Judge. —Stark 1,094 ; Moore 250. Senator. — Williamson 768 ; Clark 611. Representatives. —Lamar 833 ; Reynolds 662. GORDON COUNTY. Judge Superior Court. —Crook 682 ; Triune 661. 1 Judge Inferior Court. —Higdon 579 ; Cantrell 357. Senator. —Dabney 635 ; Freeman 610 ; Shack leford 96. Representative. —Mays 878 ; Hargrove 264. WARREN COUNTY. Judge. —Andrews 667 ; Johnson 264. Senator. —Beall 689, Reese 253. Representatives. —Pottle 479 ; Cody 432 • i Hutchins 411; Hallo 411 ; Logue 193. DADE COUNTY. Judge. —Crook 181; Trippe 222. Senate. —Hall 208; Sutton 190. Representative. —Jacoway 191; Parris 206* *This is doubtful. Another report says that the vote should be reversed. HANCOCK COUNTY. Judge. —Johnson 422; Andrews 190. Senator. —Stephens, no opposition. House. —Stewart, no opposition. CLARKE COUNTY. Judge. —Jackson 293; Dougherty 650. Senator. —Hull 510; Bailey sB3. I Representatives —Harden 605; Carlton 605- Sheats 323 ; Robinson 160, Paine 24. JACKSON COUNTY. Judge —Jackson 706 ; Dougherty 460. j ! Senate —Moon 380 ; Hays 260 ; Mitchell 195 • Horton 162 ; Burns 215. ’ Representatives. —McMultin 565; Mintr 404- McCleskey 181. ’ j OGLETHORPE COUNTY. Senator —Willingham. j Representatives— vi c Whorter and Clark. s lumpkin County. j Singleton, Riley and Keeth elected to the Legislature. Washington county. j ® Seuate Craft on 525; Bullard 607. 1 f Representatives—Boa right 597; Hurst 570; Robison 574 Taylor 550. Judge —W. W. Holt 749. 1 \ HABERSHAM COTNTY. Judges Jackson 785, Dougherty 415. Senate. —Trammel, Doubtful Dem. Representatives— Dr. Phillips, (So Rights Dem): Cleveland {So Rights Whig.) SCRIVEN COUNTY. Senate —Jackson 208; Moultry 188. House —Gross 164 ; Herrington 156 ; Thomp son 89 ; Hurst 27. Judge —Holt 275. For Brigadier General—Hayne 304 ; Polhill 48; Lawson 62. WALKER COUNTY. Johnson’s majority, 48 Dickson’s *‘ for Senator, 87 Clement’s “ for Representative, 163 Tumtin’s u for Congress, 23 Trippe’s “ for Judge, 127 In Pike county, Green (Dem) is elected Sena tor. Spaulding.—Moseley (Ind) Senator. Alonroe.—Crowder (Whig) elected Senator. For the House, Woodward (Whig) and W. C. Redding, (Dem) elected. Jenkins majority for Governor 51. Judge J. H. Starke has been elected Judge of the Flint Circuit, and Robert P. Tuppe is elect ed to Congress, from 3d District by 174 to 200 majority. Col. Dent is elected to Congress in the 4th District. Macon, Oct. 6. Trippe’s majority in Talbot 124, Monroe 40, Harris 235, Upson 291, Spaulding 42, Bailey’s majority in Prke, 147, Buits 259, Bibb 85, Hous ton 49, Crawford 56, Taylor 142,—if these re ports are correct, it would leave Bailey’s majori ty 14. Some of the reports give Trippe only 108 in Talbot—Balance considered correct. Macon, Oct. 6 — p. m. Recent corrected returns make Bailey elec ted by seventeen majority. Savannah. Oct. 6. In Tattnall county, the vote is for Johnson 49, Jenkins 340 ; Seward 47, Bartow 324. GEORGIA ELECTION. First District. a ~ sc o q £ g-a a & Counties £__ a _ £ £ £ « Appling 191 133 000 000 000 000 Bryan 76 117 000 60 000 60 8u110ch..;... 408 25 360 23 336 36 Chatham.... 786 666 761 614 548 792 Camden 176 62 060 000 000 000 Clinch 000 000 000 000 Effingham... 124 202 136 200 120 220 Emanuel 307 176 000 000 000 000 Glynn 38 94 000 000 000 000 Irwin 337 41 000 000 000 000 1 Laurens 58 539 000 000 000 000 Lowndes 430 419 000 000 000 000 1 Liberty 146 153 70 000 70 000 ! Mclntosh.... 133 79 130 55 126 56 Montgomery. 53 221 000 000 000 000 Thomas 311 416 158 000 000 00C Telfair 219 173 000 000 000 000 t Tatnall 96 307 000 000 000 ©OC . Wayne 112 62 000 000 000 00 ( ] Ware 217 268 000 000 000| OOt Second District. 5 m jS a . 2 ® a « © > s _§ 3} §• g 5 Counties £ 3 © © "© "3 J Baker 568 273 000 ~000 000 OOt t D°®ly »05 311 000 000 000 00<] Decatur 302 469 000 000 000 00C r Early 457 144 531 253 000 00C Lee 249 330 000 50 000 00C Muscogee.... 857 1039 911 975 912 93S , Macon 340 389 000 96 000 7a Marion 581 517 000 65 000 6a i Pulaski 399 246 000 84 090 OOt l Randolph... 769 777 52 000 000 OOt Stewart 648 824 100 000 000 OOt * Sumter 577 662 000 49 000 55 f Third District. G S W .9 K ® * - S .* £ g i Counties £ 3_ £ | J £ i Butts 411 264 206 " 000 259 000 Bibb 734 634 754 660 712 637 Crawford.... 404 377 52 000 000 OOn Houston 681 568 42 000 000 000 ' Harris 441 748 000 240 000 000 , Monroe 650 732 000 36 000 40 Spalding,.... 000 000 000 000 ’ Taylor 247 000 000 000 , Talbot 786 796 000 113 000 000 ' Biire 895 719 000 000 000 000 Upson 423 620 000 000 000 000 i Fourth District! 5 » © s § * g i g 5 ”3 "© 5 Counties £__ ps £ ® P o Coweta 724 774 826 679 731 693 ) Cobb 1089 888 315 000 000 000 , Campbell,.... 653 311 300 000 000 000 L DeKalb 1014 832 304 000 138 0(K) ; Fayette 697 449 150 000 000 00€ Heard 486 355 000 000 000 00C [ Henry 895 910 000 000 000 000 , Mernweth'r. 834 743 756 657 0001 OOt Troup 406 1006 000 550 0001 000 Fifth District. c M a co © q » „ | 3 " ”3 3 a Cou aGes £ £ 4S oh ' Cass 1461 905 75 000 000 000 5 Cherokee.... 1101 681 000 000 000 000 , Chattooga... 462 396 000 000 000 000 Carroll 891 428 000 000 000 000 ■ Dade 309 67 221 169 210 173 > Floyd 780 738 000 60 000 000 , Gordon 749 658 740 580 l Gilmer 838 289 000 000 000 000 Murray 1177 703 226 000 000 000 Polk 000 000 000 000 Paulding 508 359 000 30 000 000 Walker 918 731 94 000 00 J 000 Whitfield... | I 172| 000|| 000 000 Sixth District. i « " I a "H SI 5 ►> [ 1 g - | m g jU | 3 <2 Counties £_ a jf J £J g j§JJ Clarke 454 584 404 551 110 176 534 102 4 Franklin 974 380 1233 328 277 110 143 39 4 Forsyth 753 496 661 459 39 624 139 247 2 Gwinnett.... 639 730 772 797 81 662 130 574 67 Jackson 732 558 537 570 28 619 249 253 1 Hall • 695 542 645 446 127 569 102 324 000 Habersham.. 771 322 751 440 749 147 30 47 205 Lumpkin 902 522 769 38" 554 319 171 40 8 Madison 375 321 000 99 34 261! 179 164 2 Rabun 330 21 000 00 • 000 000 000 000 000 Union 673 285 000 000 000 000 Oi'O 000 000 Walton 741 536 737 538 37 682 77 421 1 Seventh District. ob O a *3 q J® •*+ g; <x> —i G £4 O 3» £ ~ -a a ta © Counties h o © * Z Baldwin 309 357 336 375 331 345 Greene 128 761 <oo 700! 000 000 Hancock 344 412 226 446 221 419 Jones 434 396 000 000 000 000 Jasper 540 410 80 000 000 000 Morgan 272 379 000 185 000 000 Newton 510 910 516 962 446 933 Putnam 322 374 307 337 287 322 Twiggs 392 330 000 000 000 0)0 Wilkinson... 512 381 110 000 OtO IKK) Washington. 592 612 532 665 527 673 Eighth District. fl «2 O □ M “ S •» oq %. to £ . q a> ~ -o a !► .—» ,T 3 ac; »r* cry 3 Cities £_ 3. J J_ £ ,2 Burke 343|464 325 543 321 516 0(>o Oftl Columbia 22ft 361 281 403 268 395 OftO 06 Albert 195 995 00ft OftO 00ft 0; 0 OftO OOi Jefferson 107 430 OftO 000 000 OOU 000 < 0 Lincoln 172 233 000 000 000 000 00ft ftfti Oglethorpe.. 206 600 216 602 185 605 000 00 Richmond... 542 739 723 938 712 881 OftO o<> Seri yen 251 226 263 179 191 147 000 Ci Taliaferro... 69 328 000 000 OftO ftQft 00ft 00 Warren 417 572 412 574 325 605 8 Wilkes 324 441 000 000 000 ftoft ftfte 06 _ Sbiwmg ARRIVALS FROM CHARLESTON. Steam ship James Adger, Dickson, New York Steam ship Osprey, Bennett, Philadelphia Brig \ ictoria. Julia, Barcelona. Docidida, Pages, Barcelona. Conocida, Millet, Barcelona. CLEARED FOR CHARLESTON. Barque Avola, Kendrick, at Boston. Brig Onward, Tibbetts, at Boston. Schr S. J. Waring, Francis, at New York. LOADING FOR CHARLESTON. Barque Carnatic, Stalker, at Livorpool. Oct 6.—Arrived, harks Ellen Morrison, Gavet, from Baltimore; Flight, Calhoun, from New York. Cleared, schr Mary A. Forrest, Baltimore. Departed, steamship State of Georgia, Garvin Philadelphia. CHARLSTON, Oct. 6.—Arrived, ship Ontario, Holmes, Liverpool; brig Monica, Loud, York schrs Maria L. Davis, Davis, Philadelphia; T. p’. Alston, Hedlund, New York; Isabella, Gage New York; Emerald, Knipo, Boston. In the offing, ship Gen. Parkhill, McKown, Liv erpool. Cleared, barque Jasper, Bennett, New York brig I Moment, Mayo, Boston; schrs B. D. Warner Har non. New York; Maryland, Foxwell, Baltimore. Went to sea, steamship Southerner, Ewan, New i fork. BY TELECRApfSs* Transmitted ’ I —-—- Ke qohn r ARRIVAL A li All| .\ . Charleston, Oct fi The steamship Arabia has arrivJ T 1 *' n with later intelligence from Europe * Hali| n Liverpool Cotton Market —The L \ week are 25,000 bales. The demand » * erate with a decline of eighth penny -'****' Fair Orleans is quoted at 6|d MiHi'r Speculators took 2,000 bales and export bales. ex rotters Trade in the manufacturing distrt » slightly declined. 3 Sfricts N Flour and Rice were active at nn u prices. ’ J nc^W Interest was unchanged. Consols had declined. Further per Arabia. The aspect ol the Turkish difc u l ti .,„ threatening. The Turks are aroused to th i “ est pitch of fanaticism, and fveo M|| tan to declare war or abdicate. I n m H the great porversareendeavuriugmltr: Sultan to accept org.nal Vienna note but r tr.a has backed out of the alliance itLl, France and England to side with R ussia ? Money market was consequently seric Us ,vd pressed, and Consuls quoted at 94j ’ Charleston, Oct. 6- D m Cotton -The sales of the week reach baies The market is unsettled and «,krte dling Fair rs quoted at 10 Jto 101 TU ’ of the week reach 4,927 bales. SJ k exclusive of that on shipboard 9,600 bales Members of the Legislature. senators. Baldwin.— Brown. Burke—Gresham. Builock.— Cone. C hath a m.— Jin dersow. Coweta —Smith. Columbia.—Stovall. £ Dad e.—Hall. Fo rs y t h. — St rickland. Gordon.— Dabney. Hall.— Dunagan. Hancock.—Stephens. Mon roe.—C ro wde r. Ne wto n. —Wi 11 iam so 11 . Pike.— Green. Putnam.—Griggs. Richmond.—Miller. Spalding.—Moreley, (Ind) Scriven.—Gross. Walker.— Dickson . Walton.— Hill. Warren.—Beall. HOUSE OK REPRESENTATIVES. Bald w i n.— McCoombs. Bryan.—Love. Burke.—Shewmake, Jones. Bullock. —Mi Lean. Chatham—H ard, Harrison. Coweta.— Bridges, Dodds. Columbia.— Watson, Barnes. Dade.—Parris. Gordon.— Mays. Forsyth.— Rice. Hall.— lleaden. Hancock.—Stew-art. Liberty.-— Jones , Smith. Mon roe.—U nderwpod, Redding. Newton.— Lamar. Putn&n.—Dawson, Calloway. Richmond.—Walker, Walton. Scriven.—Jackson. Walker.— Clements. Warren.—Pottle, Cody. Walton.— If Uli mis , Hays. Democrats in italic , Whigs in roman. [Telegraphed to the Charleston Courier] Baltimore, Oct. 5 The Wilketbam, Pi, Fugitive Slave Case —-Considerable excitement exists in Philadelphia in consequence ol wai rants having been served upon two Unite: States Deputy Marshals for an alleged assault committed whilst arresting recently a fugitive slave at Wilkesbarre, Pa A writ ol Haim Corpus was applied for before Judge Grier,aci the Attorney General applied for the discharge of the prisoners. An adjournment of the case, however, for one week was agreed to lor tit purpose of procuring witnesses. Baltimore, Oct. 5, 8.57 P. M-DifiinJtybi tween an American i a plain and the Ptrum Authorities. — A difficulty has occurred at Chin cha, between the American ship Defiance, ami "he Peruvian authorities. The Captain of tie Defiance was forcibly taken from his vessf and chained by the feet on board the Peruvia Guard Ship. It was reported that he wasdyin. 7 from the ill treatment he had received. Baltimore, Oct. 5, 8.57 P. M —MottGdr The steamship Crescent City arrived ai.^ l York on Tuesday night, with $1,000,000 in g*i Baltimore, Oct. 4.— The Chevalier Hulsmrn and Setretary Marry The Chevalier Hui*- mann, Charge d’Affaires at Washington of to Majesty the Emperor of Austria, has arrived it Albany, and had a Jong interview with Sew tary Marcy. It is believed that Koszta will k given up on condition of his returning to tie united States. Baltimore, Oct. 4.— Gale on Lake Erit A very severe gale has occurred on Lake Erie, several lives have been lost. Baltimore, Oct. s.—Syracuse Whig Com tion. The Whig Convention met at Syrac® on Wednesday, Washington Hunt presiding. J M. Cook was nominated for Comptroller,® Ogden Hoffman for Attorney General. Baetimore, Oct. s. —Great Fire in Bujf<d~ A great tire has occurred in Buffalo which to s consumed one hundred houses, involving & lO3S of $300,000. -I—- ■■■■ - _ markied. t . On the 6th inst., by the Rev. J. P. Turner, Is**' T, Heard and Mrs. Mary E, Kent, all of®* city. Comntfrriiil. SAVANNAH, Oet. 5, p. n i.-Cotm.-?*'* mand was very limited and tho sales amoonW only 102 bales, viz : 7 at 9| ; 15 at 10 ; 30 f.t * l *' and 59 bales at 10j cents. | LIVERPOOL, Sept, 16 —The Easter qitfjj ) has again assumed a more un(avorab) u ) Bank of England has further raised '.he rate or a ) count J per cent., viz: to per ce-jt.; the B*® ) factoring operatives are still unsettled, ana" 1 1 combined circumstances act prejudicially ® n . j value and domaad for Cotton., the trade ba r ‘ - , again been very sparing purcb asers, and b* w o '■ ) taken 31.190 bales, speculators 3610 bales an • porers 4400 bales, making in all only 88,-W tor the week's business. Prices are about p r lb. lower, and low grades are quite nomiua • week’s import is 66,459 bales. To-day’s sales : 000 bales. ‘ . , Breadstuff* have been in very active and pr c«s have daily advanced. Wbeatan are respectively about 7d per 70 lbs. bbl. dearer than this day week, at whichi ra amount cf business done is extensive. ]nai»n met a further improvement of6d and Is F r 1 ter. . mi t Rice — Of Carolina 220 casks sod at e prices, viz : 22 a 25s per cwt. SAVANNAH EXPOHTS-Oct. 5. ;j Per steamship State of Georg a, for "bi * I —B4caskßßice, 86 bales Cotton. 17do^do_ | 141 bales Domestics, and sundry pkg J M $• Per |schr MaryaA. Forrest, o Bah® 244 feet Lumber, 236 ba'os Cotton, 33 d and 3 packages Cotton Plants. CHARLESTON IMP I Ship Ontario, Liverpool—346l bars Iron, and 600 ?a -ks Salt | [NOTICE. , hij «p | . THE SUBSCRIBERS would embrace' j. ■ portunity of returning their thaiks t *. eT 1 lie for the very liberal patronage whicn m received the last,year, a‘d wonld respec • I a eontinuanco oft,he same We are n°* dqOP Bp large and well eel cted stock of the b V and SHOES whi*h are manufactured. jij[W I wo will sell on as good terms as any ; l0 n yAh. oity. oet 4 ALDRICH A# 0 *