Below is the OCR text representation for this newspapers page.

€£torsi* ©titsroyij ■a.. Oo!J anJ Isand Lotteries. TTER * •1-1 GOLD LOTT Prizes, draw a up to Feb, 11. p|*f_3oh,) Hart-field 357 12; E Shannon 11 1; J J Devine. 106 2l'3; l> Toucbstoues orps : Ill; ll V Vanbibbor 701 J82; Nat ban Ita-| xLPI 17 3; Rt.lit llnrpee-176 I 3- Alex Lear.', G12 4 1; S M'bniup-niu 2J0 19 2; Ju f, 'l'liomas 1711 ii; 1) Mai tin 118-J II IJ.-mi 11 Cady Hod 18 3; Hoar* Grace lie;; 5 1; Isaac Kiuuell 4(13 •1 1; Burwell Giceti ('"95 8 1; Jacob \\ Andrew - 805 17 2; L !•’ Orcushaw 593 17 3; Wards or|)S 509 1 3; Evans Shannon 63 3 2; Derma Guun \v 446 2 2; \\ in Coviugtou 1270 17 3; 1 M'Giuty 3226 14 1; John Leek C>13 1 3; Elias Sharp 146 4 3; J Lawrence 332 19 3; Yeiverton Many 501 23; Wesley Leak dll .16 3; Jas Tiltr.au 1 i3S J9 3; O Hancock-117 131; T Rossoau 1101 19 3; Sul Gliam-y 471 15 2; W Storey •'■1721 5; John Reeves sen 663 2 1; Win .Martin 392 19 3; John Sessions 200 2 2; Win 1' Mapp el? 2 1; S .M Williams 349 16 4; Win Story -on 81 1 3; John Wadsworth sen 751 21 :; J Moody 362 1 2; G IV Shnrp 1001 3 4; Wm Vaughn 117012 1. 'land lottery Prizes drawn, up to Feb 14. 'Bibb-Wm Mobley 196 5 2; Ubas Plumb 311 9 4; Wesley Varhrow - orps 125 14 3; .W Riley 166243; D J Carr 4-1 22 2; Jas 15 Johnson 191 7 2; J Warners orps 0 14 4; Champin Butler of Twiggs 279 12 2, Geo Piockard 27 7 li -1; Z T Honour 177 14 2; John Turner26 14 2; M II Wnlli! 2947 1; M B Piuman J27 202; Jas Bas se! 17711 2; F G Brown 165 24 3; L Simpson 1106 1; M Chisholm 2-1 0 1; Win Hightower 66 4 1; Mary Croesi w 101 11 3; Grey Harrell 287 23 2; Penelope 1 inch u 1-17 14 3; Green lilils orp-310 Il l; A Daniel 127 9 4; Eliz Wood w 2-i9 25 2; Washington Brady 2110 2; Kobt Kir- bou 55 10 2, A Edwards orps 10 9 1; Jos Bos wells orps 110 8 4: Alex Bryan 131 18 1; Carl ton Nunn 269 9 2; J W Caluonn 26.4 80 3; Al bert Ku.-e 312 0 i; J C Jtoiigers 30 C 1; Scott Cray 201 25 3; J A Darnel orp 96 20 3; C A Blaun 302 18 1; T ltauew 322 lo -1; John Jones’ orps 63 14 2; C 51‘Kinney sr 132 4 4; YV m Wilde 21710 1, Jos Wilson 143 0 2; Jc-se 51‘Neil ri 14210 4, Bcnj F Lum: 8U0 1 i 3; D Turner oi Jones 11 27 2; D Irwin 101 12 2; Win B ilani- son 104 28 3; S A Miller h a 206 22 2; John Green 9 28 3; Wm II Klisou orj»20911 4; John Al Sbrhuau s 31328 3; John Mi reland 125 5 4; Johu Worthy 107 14 3; Wm Smith 13 19 1; T Grubbs 207 0 1; G Capers 25-127 2; EdwD Tracy 6019 l; Johu Moguer 257 lo 1; N "Bridg es nrps 45 25 3; WmH Cnlluiue20l 53; Nancy Wilson w 134 25 2; V* in Freeuy.112 0 2; It K Carter 709 2; Eliz Parks w 28 27 2; E Long w 170 6 1; J Hatcher 25 13 3; Benj M‘Kinney jr *338123; Wm Bond 1627 4; Jordan Tapioy 179 28 3; Titos lticksousorps 29o 7 1; Jas G urge mis 11 1 28 3; Samson Al‘C..rty lo? 10 1; Jno \X Hydes 150 9 4; Tboe Martin3U2 25 2; Isaac Newberry 339 133; Thus \V Dwight 7 20 3: J Lamb 158 1; Thus Gardner 46 0 1: D II Will iams 226 02; A E F-arucst s 140 10 2; NOAluii- roe 296 Id 2; Al Ungers lu6 13 3: A Haimnill 169 2-12; W in Carlisle 170 213; T II Mnuu s 131 17 1. lluth— Rolit Smith sr r s 221 8 3; N B Bar nett 104 5 3; BF Collier 155 20 2; Gales Jinks 13326 2; A*ney Kilcrcasc w 05 8 1; John Du- kin sr 119 6 2; John Floyd 1159 4; Stew.in Lee 261 13 3; Jsanc W Smith s 1 w 159 20 3; Ste phen D Mays2?0232; S Jackson 01123; Win M Hart er Id 24 2; It N Young 295 7 3; G Roi ly 24025 2, Jos Byars 230 13 4; John Draper 2-4 4 2; G ill .Michael 135 12 3; Hugh Goen 120 7 2; Emit i llli--its orjic 145 14 3; Jo.-i.di Crain 28 6 2; O Payno w 228 27 2; .\, Stcpi ens w 203 2.2; Writ Wallaces97 1; A Cleavclund 61 11 2 ll Hamilton 274 9 1, Wm Harrison 9 10 3; M Yi.'J -cnt w 110 20 2; \Y W Gaither 2/1 11 2; A :.ou htoaslw9d6 1; J Hull 16 16 1; Kobt Heodorst fl 109 lo 3; J It M Mabau 108 19 4; L Jester2357 2; J.isG .Mays 10 4 4; '1 hoa Braunn 331 11 4; R 11 Kclcresise 175 9 4; \\ m Harmon 27 7 J; W urn a 1’ Ivcnuvu J4 5 2; Robl Thnith ir 54 11 -i; Win Phillips237 4 4; J Carter 300 10 3; J L Hairston 214 7 3; J Drcskiils orps 254 9 3; Alien Gray 23622 3; L Jester r i 2/3 li 2; It N Ma k in 86 15 3; Jos Higgins 13 25 2. CampLiJl—i otni Love .25010 1; Win M 4 il- vaine 131 171; Wm Mullins jr 240 7 1; Josiah Van s 07 11 2; Jos Beaver- orps lOo 14 4; Clai- borno Gorman 2 ~3 3" ran-h 99 5 3; Wm B l.oveliless2ol 27 2; W in J Crow 22 103; John F. Findley 511.11 2, Sa/ali Beck w 143 Id 1; P Htfoler 20] 7 1- C A Heard I4i 22 2; 5 I) B(d- fiugton i'9 7 4; J W Lumpkin 103 10 3; .Seth L Allen 297 20 2; Thus Moguu |9<J 11 3; J Har dy 215 31; Q, i aylorOO lo 4; J W offord 51 17 1; Milledge Barney 165 10 3; Win' Glassun 152 101; Guriaud Jinks orps2538 1; Elbe Smith 177 13 3; E Hammond jr 211 13 5; Jesso Miller25 4 4; Gc« Stephens - 183 242; l.iiz Jinks w tl9 !04; J 11 Dent234 9 1; J 8 Colquiitc 67 13 3. Com hi—Wm Brock s ! w 139 1-1 4; (as Hasty 278 6 4) Wm S .Mayo 13728 3; J:» Arnold 40 9 1; J Lees 1 w 103 9 3; Gilbert Gay 291 17 1; J II Jtccd 99 20 3; llcuj Smith r s 31023 3; Philip Wares I w 20-1 22 2; Jos Smith 141 14 2; Jas 3 Miller 125 27 2; John *'«p*229 7 1; J II Smith 87 5 -!; Jas Bell 23 10 1; Win J1 Kelly 26 13 3; B J Weld. 15.) 1! 4; Wm li < ..wen 2117 6 2. J ‘G Fry 53 12 3; Solomon Lee s 1 w 131 101; Nancy Bay w 124 9 3; Jos Bebton 63 9 1; Ma son Morris 18522 5; Sarah Jones xv 157 04; Jes se stepiiens 968 2 2; K<lw<l .Vi storey J-9 i 2; Jr.i 1. .Sinifli .'{(Hi IJ 3; Join Dean JB1 l 2 .lo. Kandolpk 299 6 I; I. Sparks 77 6 3; Wm Hull 35 13 4; Sine Bell 148 11 3; Johu Goldsmiths i w 26 54; J Watsons orp- 72 8/ 2; Joan Davis 10 7 3; John G Frys 1 w 258 2°2; John \V lloh- toson 3 lit 1; John Watsons orps216 212; Win Scot! r s 215 10 3; J Fielding 324 26 3; Samuel Barrett 245 27 3, M Smith si w t.2<> 7 J; Green Wood s 1 w 277 202; A C Boon 60 7 1. Crawford—1) M‘l arty 33238; RNorthernw 1056 4; M arlha J Abhott orp 114 6 2; Jiixiiau ADKiiiney w 1825 4; Jas T Car*;ajiheu 251 4 2; 1- ham Pittman 14816 1; s Ca-tleberry tv J26 2i»3. Bcnj White si w 279 21 3; T Jackson 70 1!< J; Eliz Raines b a 140 5 2; Win F Young 135 25 2; 1. Tn.-.uums orps 68 7 3; Dolly Owens w 309 27 2; J B Hancock22Q10 1; W m Gassett26 30 3; John Brown312 223; T LSatlenvhito 18 14 4; Jesse Matthews 157 10 J; li Harvey 126 263; Sma Bus.cl tv 221 7 4; Thus D Harrison 25 ft 4, J Prossers orps 22U 12 2; Al-on M Gratc- iiouso 97 2/ 3; Jos VV il.lcr 105 23 3; 1) .M tstew- art 248 23 3. , I'ajjdti—Wn» Davis 1S5 13 2; Lindsey Hol land 212 143; Isaac Waldrop 1-.7 7 J; J Jiani-s 2- 177 >r DrrSvry Banks 12-17 Jd 2, Jos II Cun ningham 11711 1; JRobt Higginbotham 20 3 2; 4Vm Ivy J9I 03; IDnry Mitchell 231 101; Hilas Turner 6 3 2; Eliz Guntrv de.d ri 12 2: Su-an- Jtah M‘A rty w 4 20 2; Stafford Gibson 212 8 2; Bcuuet Youngblood 2r3 6 1; Elijah J’ Allen 296 7 2; Jus E Bb.n 17 11 3; Peter 1 ,.tes 145 25 2; 11 D Payne s 50 10 I; Elijah P Allen 197 7 2; Wm Jack 293 14 2; Wm K Patton 5 22 3; Sie- J hm I.il.s jr 107 II 3; S I) Vaughan 25 22 3, M‘Elroy 222 Hi 4; IV |> W illiford 257 7 2; 11 Ogle tree 2.52 8 2; Jas E Vev 242 5 2; J Meeks 2>Of 3; C M’Kih.vion 17 4 2; Jas M‘.Mullen 214 7 I; J-s En!.-,;)!., 5; -2f» I; ii BaMbford J09 2. Bhub-ruri.T 61 «M; Robl Y M Tucker U dnidcr 3? 28 8; J WhahNY 102 24 U >/' Tl 3 - 1 W rV ‘ ~ 7 * C 220 .'I :,; ' Johnson w r s 70 6 3; Mark Tun>r 1 ■clT*’ : '4-332; H .Moseley 160 62- J R*k»u 13909 Ik Mhn Nieh,.k iu 7 Arkitis r sCOI 12 2; IloitS ColoJlOO 4 2; Edw il ii ji 215 17 L; i-li W L 1 ley 12-1 i‘2 4; L Eason .. 2-> 6 3. Uriah Carter 2U->.0 3; David .Miles 128 253; 1. Penniugien - 2'."o 10 1; Citizen Sparks 4 • 3: E *J V, mipc-y 59 10 4. Hrnr-- Geo.ge Jiotz 254 12 3; G Hodman l! ' ,: <■/ 2; Joseph I.ites 2lit 7 8; Alex Lemon 1~9 V 1; s SV Stephens 100 19 I; \\ Stewart s 1 « 11819 4; Jo- Tommcs orps 175 10 3; Pleasant A Cates 2?' Is 1; Johu Cullals orp-85 9 I; li 1 \\ Tindall 199 10 1; Alien l.-te- 117 9 8; Kobt j K TurneroL/0 9 4t Giaham to9 6 4; Truvi. j Johnson 63 26 3; D Gillespy 74 27 3, JS J ester j 130 10 3; A W Tipper 83U 13 4; Jus Bridges jr 210 -1 1; Jus Murray 1 161; John .Murray 197 6 1; Jos G Higginbotham 165 13 4; Jas Baxters orps 13 11 3; Isaac Hand ir 49 26 2; Sarah Cook w207 11 3; Jas Love 40 34 3; A Hiusley 94 19 1: L Brotvn 117 27 3; Alex Harris 152 11 3; J M‘Council 122 14 2; S W Stephens 311 86 3; E W Jackson 45 4 4; 11 Stoke-293 7 1; Isaac Langston 136 22 2; Geo Nolen 93 6 4; Pyent E Jackson 103 4 2; Jn- F Gibson 52 4 4; vliarlcs Kersey 293 6 4; Lavinia & Jauc Porter orps 298 82 2; WinV Crew 103 25 3; Win A Crumble 2^5 11 4; E Arnold 308 25 2; Jus Sowell 15910 3; M Anderson 8-10 4 2; ’1 hos Baker 808 0 o; M Holland 183 11 t; Hannah Baxter w 80623 3; F itussel 200 9 2;. Thus Jackson 1.12 14 3; E Cloud s I7el—97 89/ 23 3; J Bankston 50 6 3; M llyleys orps 80u 134; Alary Beepers w 22 6 1; Jemima Fincher tv r s2I9 9 4; J .U‘Culley 104 7 2; Jas L Brock 94 28 3: Wm Hall 76 25 2; 11 Brotvn tv r s 149 18 2; L II Turner 15 23 2; 1 Edge 300 20 3; Jas Grizzel 2t0 12 2; A W hite 4225 2; Jas Rogers 31 7 4; Isaac Coker r s >123 20 3; J D Parish 97 8 3; I> Campbell 147 18 1; John Sappington r s 88*9 10 1: J C Latig 95 4 4; Jas Love 70 19 4; Davi.l Griffin 4l 5 2; 1 Muore r s 59 8 2; T J Turner 126 15 3; Alary D Kent f a 262 6 3; J P Bukelew 151 16 4; Isaac Weldeu 57 0 4; Jas W rigtn :i23 223; Jackson tinnih 302 253; Johu Thompson 20? 22 3; Eliz Daniel d 60 d 105 15 4; U in 11 Uatford 31 80 2. Houston—Eliz Liudsty h a 72 17 1; - 5 Lit- tleBeJdsorp 191 23 8; Wm Sanford 11822 3; H Hand s zM 0 4; Alex Smith 154 14 3; A Pages not afraid of responsibility. That was true,] moment for friendship. In return for the rn- too, Mr. G. said. Every body knew it to be' mors of contentions and hostile feelings, wlncn so. But, in asking of him for information, ir have so often come to us from South Carolina, outrht to lie so asked as not to seem to require! 1 hope we shall now send back to her tidings o from him more than he ought to communicate, peace, the offerings of good will, a tribute o What is it, said Mr. G-, that we wish not to be concession, not extorted by her menacing attt- eommunicated? Only that the names ofpri-[ tude, Iter marshalling of troops, and trumpeting vate individuals, if any sucii arc connected with forth of proclamations, but yielded to.lici out o the information in possession of the president, our abundant love for her as a sister, and ivoir mav not be exposed. There was no necessity a spirit of conciliation, and a sense of the de*‘p for any such disclosure. Whatev utive bad done, lie would communicate; and 1 why he had done it. It was merely to prevent private individuals from being compromitted, that Mr. C. wished to limit this call. W r ns not party excitement already high enough in South Carolina! W r as it not already high enough throughout the na tion! Did gentlemen want to add fuel to the flame; If they did, Mr. G. said he was opposed toil. He would rather see peace and good will and harmony prevail, than by-any act or vote of his increase the .discord: Air. Callmnn here apologizing for interrupt ing Air. Grundy, suggested that it would per haps save him some time to apprize him that the mover of the resolution was not present in tbd Senate at lliis time. Air. Grundy said he should soon finish what jittle he had to say, when the resolution might belaid over till the mover was present'. He wished that the resolution, without being the means of any unnecessary excitement, should be promptly- acted upon, because lie believed that it would elicit information which would go in a great degree to allay; the public feelingi and to remove groundless apprehensions; that it would indeed abate rather than increase the existing excitement in the South. The Senator from South Carolina, had seemed vesierdv to intimate that the infohna- was no necessity a spirit 01 coucmauuu, w. 1 Mover the Exec- .and enduring obligation which wo feel topre- nmunicate; and) serve tne integrity ol this hallowed Union. WASHINGTON, FEBRUARY 12. Mr. Clay said he had, oh the proceeding day given notice that he should ask leave to offer to the consideration of the Senate, a bjll to modi fy the act of the 14th July, 1832, and the other acts of Congress ihiposing duties on imports— ail d,that with permission of the Senate, he would make some explanation of its provisions. In taking this step, he had no personal views to gratify—his course had been exclusively gov erned by ti deep sense of the duty winch he owed the ebuntry, in its present distracted, con dition. When, he surveyed the face of the coun try, evidence of the highest degree of prosperi ty was every where to be seen—and yet through out its whole wide-spread extent; gheat dissen- tions and divisions of opuitou. prevailed. In in troducing the proposed measure to the House, he had two great objects in view. Th«* first re lated to the Tariff policy. He would express the opinion which.had not been hastily .termed, that the policy of protection was in the most imminent danger. If it should he preserved for pie present session, it must inevitably fall at the next Session of Congress: The -eauses which had produced this itate of probability »e would not noiV go into! Ho was fully satisfied that the existing-tariff could not be prescribed. not see in this proposition brought forward at iiiis time, and under such circumstances the el- ments of success.—It was too near the close : the session to take up an original proposi tion of this character in the Senate. In ms view it would be better to wait the action ol the ether House upon the bill now before them. There was now but fourteen days ol the ses sion. If the whole ol both houses were unani mous in the wish of passing tnis bill, excepting twenty members gifted with ordinary powets ol lungs, they would have it intrieir power to pre vent its becoming a law at tiiis si ssion. lie re joiced at the proposition which had been made by the Senator—-regarding-it, as lie did, as an offering made by the manufacturing interest up on the altar of peace and concord. 1 he other party to the controversy might regard this bill as either a projet. or011 ultimatum oi that inter- but by the application of forcible measures. Recourse to such a policy cou d not fail to be 23 3; A Auldrhige f s 223 12 2; B Al Os ^ 214 4 4; \txu Holloman 18 18* 3; N E Ducker j gtafQ of Tennessee, and nd other iiulivid- 263 9 1; H L Irwin 382 8 2; D Hawkins orp 57 J lja j was j 0 j, e "affected or committed by what ben he did speak., fol; others ho when he did not say so, he spoke only as one of the Representatives of Tefme? lion which he (Mr. G.) had then given ought to be regarded as semi-official:—Now, Air. G. said he wished that Senator and all others to 1 attended by the most calamitous consequences, understand this: that when lie spoke oil this] \yj, t .n be lookeU to the vast extent and iinpor- lloor, he spoke as one of the Representatives of 263 9 I; 11 I. Irwin 382 8 8; u uhwkids orp 0/ j to i, c j, 0 1; A A Morgan 3U 20 2; iii Holley ji 806 10 . _ • j vim,,. 2; John J Howell 77 1U 1; J Anunoiis 93 16 4; l,c *' ,a * Lewis Ivev 50 8 1; Orps of Alex Smith 259 7 8; would say so . w Ivey 50 8 1; Orps JnsN Taylor 97 8 2; A Barker 183 28 3; Tlio* Brade 141 14 4; S Snilleys orp* 95 26 3; Moses Thompson251 16 1; R Echols oip-50 12 4; Jas J Dii-k-ou 207 5 4; Jas Joues ^9 7 8; K Bigly 303 il 3; Thus Hopkins 268 87 2; J Jordan 410 3 2; AC Clements 1077 II I; Johu Dali?c932; Drury \Y Taylor 175 17 4-, Isaac Juhnsoi! 103 0 J: J Cuh>epper73253; Thos Gilberts 899 3 2; \Vu) Daniel 140 10 l; ll Lawson 880 23 3. Mat see. lie disclaimed any remarks of his being taken for any thing but the dictates of his own judgement, tor which no other person was re sponsible, He woul^I now state to the Senate (that there might be no misunderstanding of the subject) what kind ol a resolution would answer all his tbew Bishop 214 132; Daniel Kirkiand 1389 3; purposes, anxious as he really was, that the Wm Williamson orp31 72: F Cherry 299 JO 1; I whole matter should be spread before the A David Watson 179 25 3; A Johnson s 283 12 4; J S Brooks 737 4. Jonet—R Card 292 17 1; J II ALobrook 3037 2. JiistJamKge J9924 2; J Ricks 274 11 2; Gluts Y Brooks*198 114; JacobAloorc321 7 2; tsmel- ia Seahrook 2194 2; Hiram Ansley27661; J hryaml s224 8 4; Jas 1 looms orp:. 2/0 14 2; J Leghtner I8i 16 1; Jas Martin 384 108; Uesley 1'itte 3(1. 132. John \\ G Smith lo2 87 2; Jas Wadsworth r s212 23 2; Johu Altller 89 9 4; N l’eiiuington re 191 14 2; Thus Willis 3u> 4 2; J Tool s 00 12 1; Alary Watts w 520 13 2; ll » LdwnrcJs 65 102; W in Torlcys orps i/8 14 3; J Alodis-et 224 81; Esau Davis » 87 28 2: W in P Fcrgu.sou 2097 4; Zach Johnson 2t>l 8 2; Alfred W yclifc 181 15 3; Nauey Pi|ts 75 11 3; Kobt Coldvvcll 17 10 (; Botit Ft-nais orps 150 14 3; £> Williams si u 32 lit]; Johu Key 74 9 3; Ala ry Pope w 185 0 4; J 6umners orj>s 127 15 4; W merican People, believing tiiat it would ap pear. to be ol a peaceful and not warlike char acter. The resolution might read thus: that the President ol tiie United States be requested to lay belore the Senate copies of all orders which have been issued in relation to ilnr ope ration of the troops or armed vessels of the .17- riited Stater, in or near tWc State of South Car olina since the lirstday of July^last. (or any ti dier date that geudeuian pleased.) Under such a resolution (said Air. G.) wo should get the whole of the information desired, without re quiring, or appearing to require of the Presi dent any inlormauou winch might injuriously affect anv individuals. ry rope w 103 0 4; J Cmr.iners orps 12/ 15 4; W ~ ~ Lindsey 89092; Sophia w 1758 3; Alar’ 1 GorrtsjtoiuUncc of the Charleston Conner, Holman tv 573 21 8’; Kobt bensle' jg o. W ( ASHING 1 ON; FEBi 11. Sanders 903 22, v) ll Morton 246*19 3; p Phil- “I am liappy to iulorin you that, m const impor tance of thejuteresfs protected by tj.e Tariff policy, he could, not contemplate its sudden o- verthrotv without terror. History furnished no example of such rain and .destruction as would be brought upon the country by a - Sudden re peal of the protective system. The revoca tion of tb$ Edict of Nantz was nothing to it. The complaiuts w^ich now divide and distract the American people are on the one hand, that 'they are ground down by a system of unjust taxation which paralyzed their industry—on theodier, that the vacillating, vibrating policy of Congress in relation to the protection of our own products, ailordii.ig no certain means of calculation. Before a laiV had gone into ope ration—a law, too, passed with extraordinary research and deliberation, it is now to be re pealed before its operation has been tes}ed by any experience of its provis ions. For the pur pose of taking away the occasion of these com plaiuts on the one side and ‘the other, lie had sought for some principle of mutual accommo dation, which might be satisfactory to both par ties—;to afford, on the one hand, the assurance that the fates.of duty should at a future day be brought’ down' to a bare revenue standard— and to promise on the otlter,- .stability and per manency to our policy. The basis upon which the principle of accommodation, which he should propose, was founded, was time. r /’hc extent of time which would form the ingredient of the bill, was long compared with human life—but it was short—very short, in reference to the measures of a wish government. .With these preliminary remarks, he would beg le&vc ta call the attention of the Senate to the provis ions of the proposed.hill. [Here Air. C. briefly enumerated the pro visions of the several sections of the bill.] Air. Clay then went into an elaborate ar gument, in defence of the provisions of his pro posed bill; in anticipation of the objections which might be urged against it by the friends of tho (irotcciivc system. lie contended at Oapulets by Lite motion to re-commit. Should length that it did not yield the principle of pre- it ever return from that “bourne,” it will bo in j tection, but only proposed a forbearance of its by Air. Poindexter calling for j such a changed state, so spiritualized, so freed ■ exercise. He for one was willing to sacrifice lers, &.r. fo Military and Naval! from the mortal infirmities which hate weighed j every thing to peace and union, The State of down the hill which has beeu re-committed, so South Carolina was engaged in making experi- digested, diluted, and mixed tip to meet every m^nts for the purpose of ascertaining whether conflicting taste, that I suppose there cati bo she could not disable the General Government no earthly doubt of its final passage, unless it i from executing its laws within her limits. That State must inevitably fail in those projects. It was a special pleading business utterly unwor thy o f her. It was impossible for her citizens, ingcnious.as..they undoubtedly were, to devise laws which could pot be countervailed by the General Government: Ifslie should put her threats of secession from the Union in exccu- tio'n, what would be her situation! She lias a population of about half a million of souls—ol what description a lnrge part of this population was,* he would iiQt. inquire. For her protec tion, site must maintain fleets, armies, foreign ambassadors, and all the expensive establish ments of an independent nation. How are they to bo maintained ? Will she not be com pelled to impose a tariff (pfinite'y more onerous upon her citizens than the present! What will bo the condition of a great portion of the property ofthat State—which now alone gives efficiency to her resources—and the value of which is governed by the price it bears in the South Western States! It would immediately lose a great portion of its value, ifno worse con sequence’s resulted." The failure of that State in her present schemes, was inevitable. But however misguided and rash her conduct had beenf he was unwilling to disgrace her. He could not forget that her citizens valiantly fought side by side with those of the other Mates in those battles which had secured the glory and independence of the nation. Air. C. concluded by moving for leave to introduce the hill modi fying the provisons of the act of July 14th, ijra u«v 4 1; \\ m Stanton 391 32; H f’arteu 351 351 19 2; E Mims 385 171; DiauA He>ier w 85 14 2; BA Todd 197 8 4; Jain mibe/ly 88 62; J llcnfofd 2(*J5^; lieuj Jnmi-s 92 7 2; J L Lew is 160 63; H J B Aloore856 8 3: 11 M Comer r s 237 112; W a Armc-oog n 5 5. Ruth Ei- iund w s i w 218 25 3; b Baker 190 10 1 OOiAi GiiiJisciLO am conse quence cif ajt understanding between the lead ing men ui the Northern and Eoudiern interests, there isjikely to be a modification of the Ta- ritt before the end of the session, not by the passage of tho bill in which the House of Rep resentatives’ have been throwing away their wisdom and their wind lor the last thirty days, but by the introduction of an entirely now scheme of reduction. The pending bill may "indeed be considered as sent to the tomb of the , Washington, Feb. 9. MILITARY ORDERS. The Senate proceeded to consider the res olution offered copies of all orders Commanders at Charleston, &c. Air. Grundy, remarking that a few moments only of time remained before the hour at which the special order was to he called, said, ..he should be brief in what he.liatj to say in reply to the rcinqrks made yesterday upotf the a- mendment proposed by him, having for its ob ject to leave the usual discretion with the Ex ecutive in regard to the papers proposed to bo asked for. Frnni what lie (Air. G.) had said, the gen- | light on the origin ol this new state of tilings, Bemad from South Carolina (Air. Calhoun,) but it will illustrate the aim to which it is tend- had scorned to draw an inference that. some 1 mg." It may not tell 11s who is at the bottom of correspondence, of an exceptionable natur - T ! tho chafge; or the precise why and wherefore had taken place between the President and ; j the men have now stepped forward in it, who/ some individuals in some part of South Caro- I until now, have been passively looking on; but shall be encountered midway, and overthrown and superstded'b-y the bill which Air. Clay is to introduce into the Senate to morrow. There is a prodigious anxiety to hear the. explanation on the subject, which Air.’ Clay has announced it to be his intention to give. If may throw no linn. I have only to say,, upon' that point, said Air. G. that that inference can find no foundation or support in ar.y remarks of mine. I said nothing whatever to w<irrant it. No thing that I say or know must be relied upon as evidence of such facts as the gentleman it may instruct us as to what is to he arconV nltshed overtly t and what is to be covet tly gain ed.' In all this I put S.outii Carolina out of the question, because to presume that her situation, feelings, and Interests," are tQ bp chiefly con- lilted, would he to suppose that certain polit- seems to suppose to exist. What 1 said was irtil men, who ba,ve hitherto been consistent in' this: that, considering the peculiar situation of I their opposition to her policy.and wishes, have affairs in the State of South Carolina, it whs a j suddenly started up from a slumber oft'cars.— thing to be expected that individuals should it is said, indeed, that Mr Clay and Air. Cal- havo written tu the President 6n the subji ct; J houn have had a good deal of intercourselate- iiot that the President had responded to micIi ly,’aad that the modification which is about tq communications, or given information in re turn. I spoke, in spying this, the inference of my own mind,' drawn from mini every one knows to ho the sta'le of things there. When parties were arrayed against one another as they are there, and a great excitf ment existed, it was not to be presumed that every one would moved, and the silence of Air.. Clay reference to the enforcing bill, as well as his ru mored reluctance to support that bill, are all the result of these enterviews, If so,. aTc they to be regretted ! Is it to he matter of reproach to any statesman, or to any Opposing statesman, that they have consented to burr political ani- remain sileni, and that the General Govern- mosilies, to forget past squabbles, and to merge mem would have no information" Tl if what took 1 place there. This was a supposition entirely inadmissible by any well-regulated mind. But I he had not intimated that the President had j responded to such comniunical^pns, nor had la* heard t charged that he had. lie had indeed seen something in a South Carolina paper, importing that the proclamation «.f the Presi dent had been known of thei i c before it was known In re; hut lie had seen that rumor con tradicted here by a paper entitled to as much credit as the one which promulgated it, and he had no belief in it. It bud been said, that :he President could withhold any information ho chose, without the qualification proposed to be given to the reso lution. That was very true, Air. G. said. It K19R3J^ Jrifte Niebols24 7 2; James I ha'iaiso been remarked, that the president was have had enough of lend, it is now a favorable all personal rivalry, and all the antagonist im- phl-es of their public ambition, in one gener ous, noble, country from a precipice which yawns'beneath her! 1 do not feel that I can answer these questions in the negative. If 1 love tho Union better than i love South Carolina, 1 also love South Carolina better than I love any individ ual. Il l would not see tho Union" severed by the rashness of South Carolina, so would I not see South Carolina prostrated by the lur- tlvrance of the views of any political leader.— I sincerely It pe that tlu-r will nothing occur in South Car dina, no act </f violence, no outbreak-, in^ against the laws, the effect of which would be to postpone, it not to frustrate the amicable arrangements which are now pending. Wi 18S2, and all other acts imposing duties on inl and combined effort to snatch the 1 ports. The Chair stated the question on grantiii; leax>». Mr. Forsyth said the avowed object of tin Senator wnuld undoubtedly meet with univer sal approbation. In his opinion such a prop- sition could not come mote appropriately Iron any source whatever, for we were indebted t none so much, for the universal discord «hi<- prevailed throughout the country on this sub ject. But a few months siffre, it had been in the power of {fiat Senator, to have settled tin agitating question forever. He would not now go into any discussion of the details ol ihe pro posed bill—it would not be in order. Ahi':oui a jtroj est. Whichever it might be considered, tho best course would be to withhold leave for pre senting it as an independent measure, and when the bill now in the other House comes before the Setrate, to move this as a substitute. It a- ny desire existed to see this proposition carried, this was the most effectual course. Besides, the Senate; by the Constitution, had no power ot 0- rh'inating hills for raising taxes; It he correct ly understood one ot the sections ot tho pro posed bill, it went to increase the duties on a particular description of articles from 5 to 50 per cent. Such a proposition could only' orig inate in the House of Representatives. Before he sat down, lie might ho permitted, to say, that the project; as a whole, did not, in his o- pinion, go lur enough, considering that it was brought forward, alter the admission*of the Sen ator, that his favorite system had received its irremediable wound. I nis Serpent which has crept into our-Ed<-n, is now, according to the statement oi" tho Senator, exposed in al) his na tive deformity and loathsomeness, by the touch of the spear of IllniHei. it was now admitted by tlie great champion of what had been called the American System, that the principle of rev enue alone, in the imposition of duties, was correct. As to, ruin to manufacturers, no one desired to sec it. But the claims of such as hail combined together lor tho .purpose ol'effec ting unlawful purposes, couid not bo recognized. Believing that the Senate had no power to orig inate a bill containing the provision he fiad uL- ludeil to, and that the object migut be bettor cl- fected by moving it as an amendment to the hill in the House, I10 l’clt compelled t<> op'pose tile motion for leave; he would withdraw his opposition if the Scuatorivouldstirikc the prop osition for increasing the duty upon a certain class of articles, from the bill. Air. Smith said, by the practice pf the Senate bills had been usually permitted to he introdu ced and printed for the information ot members Tiiis was not regarded as approving the princi ples contained iit them, either as to expediency or constitutionality;. He should not oppose the introduction di" tiiis bill, though it was pro tection from one end to the other. He was not willing to go beyond four years in the reduction of duties to the lowest point-r-20 ; per.cent. was too low. lie would he satisfied with 25 per cent, after the end of four years.—liis experience oi protective measures of this kind, had not been fortunate. When he had been once cheated, lie was unwilling to expose himself io the same snare. In 181G it had been proposed to con tinue protection for three years only ; 1618 it was proposed to extend it to I81G; Before that period arrived, the bill of 182-4 came. When the bill of 1828 was passed, all that was asked of its friend^ was to insert the true object and de sign of the? .hill in it,s title, in order that the ques tion of constitutionality might be brought be fore the Supreme,C.ourt. This was refused. As to the proposed hill,,there.could he no as surance that the scheme would ho permittod to go through. The time was altogether too long. Four years was quite long enough to [iring the duties down to the revenue standard. Air. Holmes said, this was a mere question of leave to introduce a bill—it was the first time he had ever, known it denied—it was a case of or- dinary courtesy. Ifleave to introduce a meas ure of this kind—introduced on the principle Ol conciliation was to be refused—he should wish lie had resigned his seat in obedience to the de mand of those, who called themselves his con stituents, before it had happened. Air. Forsyth said; if tho Senator from Ken tucky, [Mr. Clay,] had not explained tho pro visions of the bill, he should not have objected to its introduction. But, as its provisions as tet forilt by the mover, appeared to be such as could not constitutionally originate in the Sen ate, lie could not assent to the violation of that Constitution which he had sworn to support. As he had.before stated, he would most cheer fully withdraw • his objection, if the provision in question was struck from the biil. Air. Poindexter sttid lie should give his votc_ in favor of leave to introduce the bill. We had arrived at a most .singular state of tilings.— Here were gentlemen loudly' denouncing all ta riffs—who wore vef perfectly willing to vote fleets and armies l’qr'enforcing them. The ol ive branch of peace had been offered by tho pat riotic Senator from Kentucky—shall we .refuse ! him leave to introduce it, because forsooth the \ bill which contains it must, like most other bills • be amended? If one of its provisions could i not constitutionally he adopted here, is it worse j than a precious hill now under discussion which i violates the Constitution from beginning to end I and ought to he kicked out of the Senate? lie ! hoped the proposed hill, which looks to a state i o’f peace and concord, will be heard. The j Senator from Kentucky had his thanks for pro- | posing it. He regarded it as a more salutary | panacea for the disord. rs which now pervaded, the nation, than gunpowder, bails and cannon. He was willing to accede to any proposition which approached towards conciliation, rati.er titan clothe the Executive with the whole phys ical force of the nation. Mr. Spiague would.not undertake to sav tvheth erhe should he able to support the biil ptoposed by die Senator from Kentucky or not. The que>- ion before the Senate was whether its provisions iiould l»e ex-iininpd.— lie was willing to do this, ud regretted that a proposition of peace tu d been eeeived with sarcasm by the Senator from Geor- . in. Mr. ('lay rose,hot gave way to Mr. Forsyth, who would not make so ill a re urn to file courtesy ol the Senator, as Ur detain lie Senate more than a moment or two. He had een so unfortunate as to draw upon him-;elf the re of the opposite side of the Senate. The par ies who had waged the most violent war a: portions of tliem met itis approbation, he con;H T-ach other, had suddenly turned their fore>?4 upon him. U» had been told that he had received a proposiJi'iti of peace with sarcasm." It v.as a complii’leut to the Senator front Kentucky, [M r Clay,]: to say that gentleman stood at tho head of the champions of the policy of protection that ww bis proudest boast, lie could not be ac cused of sarcasm, for alluding to tv hut was re garded by that Senator and his friends as consti- •tutingj)j» strongest claim to the gratitude of his country. Tho Senator from Miss. [.Mr. Poindex ter,] had referred to air thcr measure before ih 0 Senate. Atu proper time he trusted to be able to defend tho vote he should give Upon the bill all he would now say was that the bill referred to proposed the only mode that could lie adopted for preventing the citizens of the State,of S. Carolina Ir on butchering otic another. Iii saying tiii.-. ho only .expressed the universal opinion, so far ns he was informed, of all tho moderate and intelligent eitizeus of the Southern State":. Mr. Clay said flint whether the Senator from Georgia intended his remarks .as a compliment or sarcasm was equally indifferent to him, when he had so great an object if\ view as the peace and harmony of the Union. But ho felt bound to dis abuse that gcutlemaU and the Senate as to his suggestion that the measure he had proposed had come from theorrkmifacturiug interest. Had ho lhtened to them, the proposition would not have been made. As to constitutional objection rais ed by the geiitlcmen, the bill proposed from I'erin* ning to end, to reduce the duties. He did not think the Constitution could be fairly interpreted so as to interdict the introduction of a bill modifyiuir a clau e of au act which h.ul not yet gone into op eration, .Mr. Calhoun said he entirely approved of the object of the bid proposed by the Senator front Kentucky [Mr. Clay.] Every mail w ho loved : the Union must ardently desire to' ^de'this distract ing question terminated. Until" thi- vriis douq, ' there never could he pence at.d hnruicuy atnoiih its several members. He verily believed that th„ pre-out degraded political condition of the country was principally owing to discord with i haa arisen out, of this subject. The principle upon j which the proposed bill was bussed, mr-t his entire ! approbation. If the Tariff was ever adjusted, it j could oiflyhe by gi.-iug time upon the one side; j ami coining down to a genera! system of adva- lorem duties on the other. For himself he xvculj say that bo occupied a position as hostile to the protective system as any man iii America— but he would-never agree to the passage of any bill which would destroy the capital and skill which had groxvii up under it in the Northern .2 tates. At last we must come down to the r-ys'em of ad vx.lorcm‘dntics; but he hoped not so suddenly as towmpair tho v-duc of die vast amount of skill and capital, now engaged iu man ufactures. It would not be in order to advert tu the details of the hill.; but he would repeat that its j general principle n et Ills entire npprobaticu, and 1 under it, he hoped this vexed question would be 1 settled forever. j ’Air. Dickerspn made some remarks upon the ; constitutional question, s to the power of the i Semite to originate Liiis for raising revenue, i He contended that the Senate did not posses* ; this power, whether the duties were increased ( by the biil or not. Raising revenue was a gen- ! oral" term, applicable to all bills by which taxes ! were imposed upon the people, and revenue brought into the Treasury. All such Utils must ; exclusively originate in the House of Rcjn.- Isentalhes. 1 ' Air. Webster said that, according to the j«r- 1 liamentaiy; usage, nothing but the title of ti* bill was before the Senate. The question now was, shall a bill to modify certain acts ol Cou- I gross' be received! The object of the bill Rf» I not stated in the title, and no objection as to the j constitutionality ol its provisions could fcc taken 1 j until the measure w as in possession of the 6cih ate.. He could not forbear making a remark 1 or two upon the principles cf the measure, as j they had been explained hv the Senator fret: j Kentucky; (Mr. Clay-), Considering the iff- ‘ I portance of the proposition—the sensation it I would produce throughout the country—as“ the relation in which lie stood to it, he shw-M ho pardoned for saying a few words ttpoafif, though not strictly in order. He felt hom'd i;> declare, lest his views might be misunderstood, that great and substantial objections existed is his mind, both to the principle and to the de tails of tho pr. posed hill. It entirely surrdt* £ d.ered the power of imposing discriminatfl! duties for the purpose of protection. In <iirc« contradiction to the whole system of protectio ns established by the uniform legislation Congress, for a long series of years, it profffj es that the present duties shall be reduced ata j equal rate per cent bicnially—and the end this process is the establislmu »: of ouc tffliwt rate of duty upon nil articles subject to imp* j i ho Senator from Kentucky [Air. Claj jsuj-py - | sc-s that the doctrine of affording protection* a moderate degree to the productions of Att*i j ican industry is now in imminent danger. | : l;ad seen nothing which went to destroy “ I force of opinion- e.\] ressed b j the Scnucr* i the last session, that public sentiment throy out the nation would fully sustain suebadeg- of protection. If such was not the fact, K ^ been greatly deceived. lie was con a leave the result to the good sense oi the p. pie of tho U. States, lie should ask lelT?* morrow, to lay "upon the table resolution? f -J pressive of his opinions upon thig subject. F Air. Forsyth referred to the journals ia ' port of his views rolut ve to the propriew introducing the bill, and the question vras -’ ther discussed hv Alessrs. Buckner, h-j Holmes, Chambers, Foot and King, when Forsyth said he was unfortunate in not fully understood. HecJid not object to- troductlofi'ri the bill on any other grout' that the Senate could not originate a U • taming the provision lie had ailuded to. objection was sustained by tin* opinion 1 Vice President in 1830. If the Senator Kentucky would strike out the provide ing the duty out of the bill, he would cheerfully assent to its introduduction. Mr. Clay could not strike out the pr®' referred to, which was intimately cos® with the whole principle of the bill. 1 tho provision of the Constitution on tins ss-. ^ a hill could not be said to have Qrigi'' atc " Senate, until it 1 ad passed this body- depending here, it was open to an ; ' The provision objected to, might be stn*‘J While he was up, lie would observe, i' 1 ^ lo the rerparks of the Senator frnni - 'J setts, [Mr Webster,] that he regrctW ti e principle one the details in d |L ‘ approbation of tiiat gentleman.—As to^ <rer that the system ofprot* ction wouU 1 j thrown at the next session of Cont-r< >*•.. he had before stated—that was lib s 1 He Still believed that a ma'crf' / lOn. il*’ aim w* *«v ...... - . . American people were in favor of 1 policy—but while the great diss?^"