Newspaper Page Text
ambili ou i*, to live under equal law*.”
/ * * . * N.
/ # ~# * # \
a \D STATE KIGIIT’S ADVOCATE.
MAY 22, 1833.
We are authorised to announce
JOEL CRAWFORD,
OF HANCOCK COI’TTV,
• candidate for Governor, at the eusniug
lectio*!. We heartily respond Auien !
The Proceedings of “ The Union Democra
ic Republican Meeting,” held in this place last
neck.and SYDNEY, shall appear in our next. ji
the VOLI STEEItS’ EKAMPMEST.
Nothing that we can say in commendation of the
isiitisoine and well disciplined brigade of Volun
tcrs, which lately adorned our metropolis, would
x adequate to their merits. The citizen-soldier
*as sever exhibited in more captivating colours, or
ums borne by those more capable of exercising
hem. The companies made an encampment witli
is tor four days, during which time they were under
itrict camp and field duty; the admiring specta
ors will l>ear us out in the assertion, that to such
oluntcers, arms are capable of the best use. Dur
ngthe Encampment, a splendid medal was con
ended fur, as a prize to the best marksman, and as
in incentive to emulation. The ineed was award
si to private McCall, of the Macon Volunteers.—
‘reviews to their departure, a splendid an.l sumptu
11s collation, was provided on the Court-house
rrecn. by the hospitality and liberality of Messrs,
fcnan & Howard. Suitable compliments were re
located between those gentlemen and the com
uanders of the respective corps. The sparkling
jlass was drank in pledges of fraternity and good
rill On Friday morning, the tents were struck,
md the Macon Volunteers and Washington Guards
ook up their return march, and left us under the
nos! gratifying impressions. On their way, the
ir of •• Sweet Home” was struck up by the splen
lid Hand, which had added so much to the milita
y character of the encampment, and credit to
hcmselves. Gen. Sanford and suite who had parta
enin the service of the encampment, testified their
ipprobation and esteem, as will be seen by the gene
ral orders in to-day’s paper.
The Convention.
Assembled for the purpose of reducing our cnor
nous and expensive Legislative body, closed their
ession last Wednesday, and it would be particu
larlv proper at this time to call the attention of the
people to their proceedings, which will be iound in
to-days paper. They have proposed a method of
reduction it is true : so far they have accomplished
the object for which they were convened. Hut a
reckless nnjority in that body have shaped their
dan so exclusively to the single object of acquiring
lower to be wielded by the minority in the State,
iiatits action on so important a matter has been ut
crly useless and unavailing. We cannot pass them
>y, however, without complimenting the dexterity
with which they have arranged the Senatorial Dis
torts.
Where they knew their party to be barely in the
minority in one county, they have combined it with
mother in which they had an overwhelming majori
ty: where two decidedly Troup counties were con
tiguous, they are thrown together, and instead of a
froup majority in two counties, we have it now in
only one district, and instead of two Troup Sena
tors we must look only for one. This is to us, a
new definition for the word reduction. With
them it means reducing the number of their oppo
nents—with us it means reducing the number of rep
resentatives of the people. They have projected
an admirable theory, but like all Utopian schemes, it
be lound difficult in practice. The Senate as it
15 contemplated to be arranged, is not a representa
tion ofthc people, but of the Clarke party, and they
nave oniv admitted a few Troup Senators, that their
apposition to their mad ambition may spin out the
session and thereby increase the amount of the pay.
would illustrate the matter by placing before
our readers a single instance— -‘Ex hoc uno disce
•rones." Our present Senate has heretofore had a
fliajorityen the Troup side of three or four—in
fee projected arrangement, the Clark party will
tave 29 members, and the Troup party l(i, leaving
a majority oil the other side of 13. Has the Clark
party so large a majority in the State that they i
must be represented by 29 members, while the
Troup party must be content with 10?
It has been our impression, (and wc think we arc
fortified by facts) that the doctrines of George M.
Troup arrayed under their banner a majority of
3900 of the freemen of Georgia. How potent must
bare been the magician’s wand that could have
'‘fought ii:C conversion of so great a number ol
protriots to tiirUi--serving politicians in the short
?P*ce of 10 days. .The proposed plan of reduction
'sofa piece with the notkbi'c scheme of 1825, and
15 doomed to meet the same execration from the
indignant people. The utter shamelessness
this modest majority challenges a parallel in the
“'story of the State. They might have left them
sclvesa bare majority in the reduced Legislature
ln fact, we expected no less from them, but they
''ave not minced matters at all—they have put tfic
"■air of political ascendency beyond contingencies ;
modestly placing two-thirds of their own drilled par
toous in the seats of the honest and bona-fide repre
vntatives of the people of Georgia. The marvel
J? not that they have done this, but that they did not
y> more. And will the people sutler it ? The ques
•uon need not be asked. The broad mark will be
fdaced on the foreheads of these traitors to the
r ust. The Mene Tekel Upharsin of an insulted
■*ve C alr '-a<ly been recorded against them.
'' e cannot conceive of a motive that could have
this extraordinary display of selfishness,
'he majority in that convention had been con
with awarding to themselves simply the politi-
ck power of the State, rs they had satisfied them
selves by thujjiing the pack and stocking the cards.,
to usen phrase somewhat rife in the circles of haut
ton. they might possibly have succeeded in deceiv
ing those who are not practised gamesters. Hut when
they have thus openly turned up the knave, we must
be simple indeed it we permit it with impunity. If
the Troup party having the majority in the state suf
fer their wily adversaries to overreach them in the
approaching struggle, they are delivered over,
bound hand and foot to the tender mercies of their
ancient enemies; and they have moulded the prima
ry work with such an unsparing fury, kindly leav
ing us one third of the senatorial representation, that
we may consider it an earliest of our fate if they suc
ceed. Wc rejoice however, that they have cast olf
the mask and are boldly girding themselves to strug
gle, not for principle, not for the public welfare, but
tor party ascendency.
The efficacy of State Interposition-—The
necessity oi a resort to it-Tlic Federal par
, compared with the Jesuits.
No. 3.
” e are now about to enter upon the most inter
esting part of this examination, inasmuch as we shall
endeavor to unfold and point out the great struggle
the political Jesuits of the South have been making
to unite, by their sophistical argumentation, the peo
pie of this great and powerful State with them, and
to induce them to renounce the faith in which her
sons have so frequently and so gloriously triumph
ed. \\ e hope the good people of Georgia, soon
er or later, wifi point out to them that what wc are
about to say is true, and needs but little observation
ol the movements of the Jesuits of the South, to
remove every doubt. Hut here let us call the atten
tion of our to a lact in the history of the
Jesuits of Lur«pc, to show how minutely the poiiti
eal Jesuits of the South have followed the tracts of
their prototype in their scheme to enlist the people
of Georgia under the banner of the Jesuits, and
thereby destroy the political influence of the State
in the course in which she has hitherto directed it.
It appears that there existed an excessively ignorant
sect in Lurope, called the Dominican Friars, who
were truly and devotedly pious, but whose doctrines
ol Christianity differed from the Jesuits. This sect
contended that men must have efficacious g race from
the Almighty to be saved. From this doctrine a
large majority oi the Jesuits dissented as being to
tally subversive of Christianity, according to their
ideas. Hut the leaders ol the Jesuits, ever crafty
and fruitful of expedients to overleap difficulties,
were not long in devising a sophistical argument toy
deceive the Dominicans, by appearing to agree in
opinion with them, whilst at the same time they
could preserve their own creed and avoid the im
putation of having renounced their opinions.
r lhe Dominicans would not coalesce with any as
sociation that did not acknowledge and believe that
men must have “ efficacious'’ grace to be saved
The Jesuits declared that this was their doctrine,
but took care to add, to save their creed and con
sistency that all men have “ siifficient” grace.
Here then is a declaration of the. Jesuits, when de
nuded of the deceptive covering thrown overit, that
all men have not sufficient grace and that all men
have sufficient grace, and yet, it seems, the Domini
cans could not sec through the artifice of the Jesuits.
With the Jesuits, the words “ efficacious'’ and “suf
ficient” had precisely the same signification. They
took advantage of the ignorance of the Dominicans
and they could, without detriment to themselves,
adopt the former as being in no wise inconsistent
with the latter.
Let us recur again briefly to the State of politi
cal parties in the Southern country. There is a
party here opposed earnestly and heartily to the ar
bitrary exactions of Congress, and more especially
to the Tariff as a system ruinous to the prosperity
of the people of the South. The party in Carolina,
after having exhausted every argument which could
be made to the reason and justice of the party fa
voring the measure—after having used every term
of expostulation with which their wits could supply
them—after having supplicated Congress in vain to
relieve them from the burdens of the Tariff, were
of opinion that each State in the opposition should
throw herself upon her Sovereignty and thus resist
the Tariff. Another party (the political Jesuits)
rose up and said to the people, “this was not the
true doctrine nor the rightful remedy—that if it
were pursed it would lead to disunion.” What then
is the rightful remedy, asked the State Rights party?
The political Jesuits, (miscalled the Union party)
answered, “ Secession.” And pray what is seces
sion ? Here they were struck dumb. They dared
not answer the question before the appearance of
the Proclamation. Secession is now said to be, and
rightfully is, disunion. Only observe the sophistical
reasoning of these Jesuits before the President de
clared against the right of secession.. They said
that nullification was not an “ efficacious” reined}',
because it was supposed to be the harbinger of dis
union, but yet they declared secession to be the
proper and efficacious remedy ! These political Je
suits, who were opposed to nullification because it
would lead to disunion were yet in favor of seces
sion, a favorite phrase of theirs at one time. What
contemptible sophistry was here ! Why did they
oppose nullification, if in their opinion it would lead
to disunion, when they pretended to be in favor of
secession ? The nullifies said their remedy was a
peaceable one. Well, if it is, so much the better,
the Jesuits would have said, it they had not been
Jesuits, and had been sincere in their opposition to
the Tariff. They said they were in favor of seces
sion and.opposed to nullification because it would
lead to disunion I This was Jesuitism for you !
The nullifiers proposed to get rid of the Tariff and
save the Union. This at least was their purpose.
The Jesuits, in truth, wished to keep up the Tariff,
and doubtless to save the Union, after a manner—
.for nobody believed them when they said they were
secedcrs. It was to gull the people that they said
so. To dissolve the Union ever would be to defeat
the ulterior views of the Jesuitical party, being the
same party known in the Federal Convention as the
monarchy party. They there advocated the estab
lishment of a limited monarchical government at
once. It was a favorite maxim of these political
Jesuits, “ that in countries of wide and extended
territory, the Republican form of government could
not exist, or if it could for a limited period, it must
prove inefficient” —for their purposes we have no
doubt. Therefore to dissolve the Union is no part
of their policy. It would be a death blow to the
very power by which they hope to achieve their ob
ject. The national government is to be supported,
cherished and invigorated until, with Sampson-like
strength, it can bring the States under its dominion
and subjection. Thon Abe States will be consolida
\ ted into one grand Empire, ami the inevitable con-
I sequence will be that we shall have a despotic King
to rule over us. Can it lie expected that they will
ever lend their countenance to any principles or
! measures which will cither cripple the jsjwerof tbo
i general government otdestroy it entirely and thus
[make it impotent in its hostility to the State govern
ments ? We hope no republican has so much fatuity
as to encourage the opinion for a moment. Let
them beware then of the Jesuitical cant o r this
party.
We come now to consider the part the political
j Jesuits of the South have been trying to play of!'
upon Georgia, as did the religious ’Jesuits upon the
poor Dominicans. Georgia has declared that a
State can arrest the operation of an unconstitution
al law within her limits and has carried these prin
ciples into practice. In a word, she has nullified. —
Well, how did the political Jesuits get over this ?
Oh ! it only needed a little of the sophistry of the
Jesuits from Smith, Huger, Forsyth, Gumming et
alii to settle the matter to the satisfaction of the
good people of this State, as these sagacious states
men dreamed. The work was commenced. The
people of Georgia were told by these Jesuits that
they had “ sufficient” power to abrogate and nullify
the laws and treaties made with the Cherokee In
dians, hut all the States have not the “ efficacious”
power. That is, Georgia, Virginia or any other
favorite State with King Andrew the first, may
nullify, but none others can. This was the Jesuit
ism attempted to be played off upon the South by
these men. Hut this was too thin a covering for
the minds of the people of Georgia. Thev hap
pened to have more sense than these poor Domini
cans, whose intellects were as dense and as cloudy
as Baeotian atmosphere. The nullification of the
Tariff was Calhoun nullification, but the nullification
of our Treaties and the decisions of the Supreme
Court of the United States was Jackson nullifica
tion. This last is glorious—is indeed a conserva
tion of State Sovereignty, but the former is dam
nable—is the slaughter of all liberty. This lucky
hit out-jcsuited Jesuitism. They struck, as they
thought, the proper chord then. They have knocked
this Calhoun nullification as flat as a flounder by
Jesuitism! What a dangerous club this thing called
“Jesuitism” must be! It is more“ efficient” and
more “ efficacious ” than the celebrated jaw-bone of
the mighty ass with which the powerful Sampson
slew that gigantic race called the Fhilistines.
PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE
CO AST 11’ IT TIO \.
Whereas the third section of the first ar
ticle of the Constitution of the State ot Geor
gia, is in the following words, to wit: “The senate
shall he elected annually on the first Monday in No
vember until such day of election be altered by law,
and shall be composed of one member from each
county, to be chosen by the electors thereof,”
And, whereas, a part of the seventh section of the
first article of the Constitution of the State of Geor
gia, is in the following words, to wit: “ The House
ol Representatives shall be composed of members
from all the counties, which now are, or may hereaf
ter be included within this State, according to their
respective numbers of free white persons, and inclu
ding three fifths of all the people of colour,” and in
the same section, the following, to wit: “ each coun
ty containing three thousand persons agreeably to
the foregoing plan of enumeration, shall be entitled
to two members, seven thousand to three members,
and twelve thousand to four members, but each
county shall have at least one and not more than
four members.”
And whereas, the aforesaid third section, and
the said parts of the seventh section of the said first
article of the Constitution touching the representa
tion in the General Assembly of the State, have
been found by experience, to be defective, on ac
count of the great numbers in the Legislature, and
the enormous expense on account thereof: We, the
delegates ot the people of the State of Georgia, in
general convention assembled, chosen and authoris
ed by them to revise, alter anil amend the said two
sections, and other parts, if any, touching the repre
sentation of the people of Georgia in the General
Assembly, have, after mature reflection and delibe
ration, declared the following to be amendments in
lieu of the aforesaid third section and parts of the
seventh section, when ratified by the people of the
State, shall be taken, held and considered as of the
Constitution of the State of Georgia in lieu of the
aforesaid. »
The Senate shall he elected annually, on the first
Monday in October, until such dav of election bo al
tered by law, and shall be composed of one member
from each senatorial district to be chosen by the e
lectors thereof; which said senatorial districts shall
be formed by adding two contiguous counties to
gether throughout the State, without regard to po
pulation, as is hereinafter specified and defined, the
county of Murray excepted, which shall constitute,
together with such county or counties as may be
hereafter formed out of the territory now compos
ing said county of Murray, one senatorial diJtrict;
the whole number of districts shall be'forty-five
and no more ; and in the event of the formation of
any new county or counties, the Legislature at the
time ol such formation, shall attach the same to
some contiguous senatorial district.
Each Senator shall be a resident of the district
for which he may be elected, as is required by the
present Constitution of residence in the county.—
The following shall be the senatorial districts, viz :
The county of Murray shall constitute the Ist
district.
2d, composed of the counties of Gilmer and Union.
3. do do Rabun and Habersham.
4. do do Lumpkin and Cherokee.
5. do do Cass and Floyd.
6. do do Jackson and Hall.
7. do do Fra.iklin and Madison.
8. do do Gwinnett and Forsyth.
9. do do Paulding and Cobb.
10. do do Fayette and DeKalb.
11. do do Campbell and Carrdll.
12. do do Coweta and Meriwether.
13. do do Troup and Heard.
14. do do Henry and Newton.
15. do do Walton and Clark.
16. do do Oglethorpe and Elbert.
17. do do Greene and Taliaferro.
18. do do Wilkes and Lincoln.
19. do do Morgan and Putnam.
20. do do Butts and Jasper.
21. do do Pike and Upson.
22. do do Harris and Talbot.
*23. do do Crawford and Monroe.
24. do do Bibb and Houston.
25. do do Jones and Baldwin.
20. do do Twiggs and Wilkinson.
27. do do Warren and Hancock.
28. do do Columbia and Richmond.
29. do do Burke and Scrivcn.
30. do do Washington ami Jefferson.
! 31. do do Bulloch and Emanuel.
j 32. do do Laurens and Montgomery,
j 33. do do Dooly and Pulaski. ,
1 34. do do Marion and Muscoge?.
{ 35. do do Randolph and Early.
36. do do Sumpter and Stewart
37. do do Baker and Lee.
3S. do do Irwin and Telfair.
39. do do Appling and Tattnall.
40. do do Chatham and Effingham.
41- do do Bryan and Liberty.
42. do do Mclntosh and Glynn.
43. do_ do \V ayne and Camden.
44. do do Ware and Lowndes.
45. do do Decatur and Thomas.
1 he House ot Representatives shall be comj>osed
oi ineml>ers from all the counties which now are
or hereafter may be included within this State, ac
cording to their resjx>ctive numbers ot free ichite
persons. The whole number of members in the
House ol Representatives shall be one hundred and
forty-four and no more, except in the case of anew-
county or counties: such new county or
counties shall have one member tor each county
until the taking of the next census thei ealter ; and
the whole number shall be apportioned in the fol
lowing manner, to wit ; The lifteen counties ha
ving the highest number of free white j>ersons shall
he entitled to three members each ; the 25 counties
having the next highest number of free white persons
shall have two members each, and the remaining
49 counties shall have one member each.—When
ever, trom the Creation of anew county or counties,
the whole number of members in the House of Rep
resentatives shall exceed the number of one hun
dred and forty-four, it shall be the duty of the Legis
lature, at its Erst session after the taking of the first
census after the creation of such new county or
counties, in apportioning the members, to take one
member from one of the countieshaving three mem
bers to supply such newly created county, always
beginning With the county that has the smallest-num
ber of free white persons that may he entitled to
three members. The census shall betaken as here
tofore once in seven years, and the Legislature shall,
at its first session after the taking of each census,
apportion the members among the several counties
of the State as is herein before provided: Provided,
each county shall have one member.
Done in Convention, 15th May, 1833.
JAMES M. WAYNE.
President of the Convention.
A ttest, i
WilkixS Hunt, [ Secretaries.
Hamilton B. Gaither, 1
•com MI'NTCATED.]
The following resolutions, were offered by Mr.
Torrance at the Union meeting in Milledgevillc,
and rejected.*
Resulted, That the acts of Congress unless made
in pursuance ol' tlje Constitution are not binding
upon the States or people.
Resolved, That the General Government is not
the exclusive or final judge of the extent of its own
powers, but that as in all other cases of compact
among parties having no common arbiter, the States
have an equal right to judge for themselves, as well
of infractions, as of the mode and measure of re
dress.
Resolved, That w here resort can be had to no
tribunal superior to the authority of the parties, the
partie's themselves must be the rightful judges in the
last resort: whether the bargain made has been pur
sued or violated.
Resolved, That whenever a State believes its
happiness and prosperity will be promoted by it, it
has the right to w ithdraw from the confederacy.
* The last resolution was withdrawn before the question
of consideration was takes.
nr E are requested to announce that Maj. WILLIAM W.
CARN ES ot .Milledgevillc, as a candidate for Comp
troller General, at the next election.
May 20
Kimmon» Crawford
OF Columbia county, is a candidate for Comptroller Gene
ral, at the approaching election.
May 15 lrt—3t
-- ' S lIY-XIISTItY. “
I t KO. 1,. BAlvFit respectfully informs the residents of
* M Milledgeville, that he will deliver a lecture, or probably
more than one, on this important science
TO NIGHT,
The lecture will lie concluded by the administration of the
Nitrous Oxide, or Exilerating Gas.
May 15
Speeches
iDiaTfryj-rjrjLD an warn
co\vi;\vio\
OF THE
HELD n COLUMBIA
is
MAKCH, 188*.
To which is prefixed the Journal of
fETO '*) cs. r»«r« m «
Fit ICE FIFTY* CE.VTS.
Just received, and for sale by
81. D. .1. SLADE.
FOU SALE—LOTS OF LAID
T|J’OS. I S3, Gilt District -fill Seel ion.
I.XI 252, 2<l “ *d do
ai, 2«ii» “ “ and»
17, nth « “ do
AIso—GOLD LOT 1187, 3d Dist. 4th Section.
•Apply to JOHN M. CARTER.
Mflledgeville, May 20
Head Quarters, Camp CutliDcrt, i
Near Milledgeville, May 17, 1833. $
ORDEBS.
The Maj. General in relinquishing the command of
the Encampment, which, at its commencement was so
courteously tendered him, would do injustice to his own
feelings, were he to suffer the several Corps’ of which
it was composed to seperatc without bearing his testi
mony to the soldierly deportment, exact discipline, and
military skill evinced in their several drills ami evolu
tions under his superintendnnee. In every point ot
view he regards them as worthy of his highest commen
dation, and cannot permit the occasion to pass without
expressing his conviction that the system of Volunteer
Encampments as introduced by themselves, is the only
efficient plan of diffusing military knowledge, of excit
ing military feeling, as well as the only sure means ol
furnishing a military force, at once prompt and compe
tent upon every emergency.
Under this impression, he cannot btrt hope that the
Legislature will extund its fostering hand in aid of a
projectof so much importance and benefit to the public.
The Major General tenders to the Officers and men ol
the Macon Volunteers, Washington Guards and Geor
gia Guards, his best wishes for their collectivo and indi
vidual welfare.
By order of Maj. Gen. Sanford.
WM. S. ROOKWI'LL, Aid-de.Carnp.
NOTICE.
pTVIE subscriber offers for sale a valuable settlement of
l l Land on Long Cane Crock, (j milt* south of LaGrange.
There is on said premises’* large improvement with u Saw
and Grist Mill, (in good order) commodious buildings, good
orchards, a cotton machine, &c. Persons wishing to pur
chase will please call on me.
ELIJAH HARALSON.
Troup county, (la. May 4, 1833. 13 2ln
•fie.deface's Prize Office.
r T , H E following are the Drawn Numbers of the NEW
, YORK CONSOLIDATED LOTTERY, Extra Class
No. 12, for 1*33.
50—30 13—54 18—23—53—6 9—9—35.
“ But oli! ambrosial cash, ah who would lose thee,
\\ lien we no more can use, or even abuse thee.”--Bvron
4 PRIZES OP *IO,OOO
•ind Tickets only 5 Doiis.
fBMIE NEW.YORK CONSOLIDATED LOTTERY
, , „? Xtra nJ aM ’ N u’ i* [° r ’ Tl,c drawing is expec
ted at my Ofl.cc on the .10th or 31tt of May. 1
«« Number Pottery— 1C Drawn Ballets.
SCIIF.TIF.
1 prize of 810,000 is 10,00<V
10,009 is 10,000
10,000 is 10,000
10,000 is 10,000
1 “ “ 2,200 is 2,260
1,1)00 is 1,000
1 , “ “ 500 is 5,000
13 “ “ 300 is 3,000
“ * “ ,200 is 4,000
100 is ti,SQO
“ “ 40 is 2,240
“ “ 30 is 3,360
11 2 “ 25 is 2,800
“ “ 20 ‘S 4,480
* 1° is 19,600
1 5,400 “ “ 5 is 77000
PRICE OF TICKETS. ,
iWholes 85—Halves *2 00.-Quarters SI 25.
OIILAT lEW-VOHK BCIIERE.
100 Prizes of SIOOO
AEW-VOKK CONSOLIDATED
HOTTER
Extra Class Number 13, for 1533.
'f’oiie drawn in the City of New-York on Wednesday the
29th of May. • The Official draw ing received at McGehee’s
Office on tho 7th June.
66 No. Lottery— 10 Drawn Ballots.
□tfisrji&rjso
1 Prize of 20,000 Dolls.
! ** ‘‘ „ 10,000 Dolls.
5,060 Dolls.
* ‘ 3,000 Dolls.
ItIO OP 1,000
10 “ “ 500 is 8,000
50 “ “ 100 is 5,600
30 “ “ 80 is 4,480
"2 “ “ 50 is 5,600
113 “ “ 40 is 4,480
224 “ .30 is 6,720
13,10 “ “ 20 is 39,200
la 100 “ “ 10 is 154,000
PRICE OF TICKETS.
Wholes lO—Halvess— (Juarter* 2 50.
1 rizes cashed, and prompt attention paid to orders, at
N. AftCEHEE’ti
, , Lottery & Exchange Office.
Milledgeville March 27. 1833.
Milledgevillc r trect Lottery Office.
Oh FILIAL PRILL LIST of the Second Day’s
Drawing continued on the 11th May, 1833.
Those Numbers to which no Brizes are affixed, are
eacii entitled to a Brize of Twelve Dollars.
69 553 491 129 - 95
181 663 496 153 144
222 748 511 177 163
255 757 005 318 203
333—20 704 019 414 278
33f 944 688 401 ”39
394 703—20 544—20 303
415 5115 829 551 390 20
410 136 580 339
420 175 0094—20 092 460 °0
400-20 203 1,7 721 409 ~
499 289 132—20 794 503
06-J 391 162 839 533—20
782 407 335 77a
803 416 355 18il5 954
809 434 374 130 ..
1107 489—20 478—”() 497 oq 21
- 178 514 Old—2o 577 59
342 585—20 712 591 70
302 012 840 033 230
455 695 886 674 381
559 832 899 715 405
624 950-20 g 849 599
643 -a 10102 907 012
717 6017 170 913 838
812 01 292 047 847
870 07 304 963
2007 308 594 11011 241
327 403 620 120 3>9
383 470—20 001 |3G 342
459 490 709 213 557
582 003 734—20 238 576
008 634 892 .383 60S
3*5 663 921 525 642 20
673 005—20 957 000 067
080 784 981 ' 038 870
759 869 059 903
9H5 894 11052 710 924
3011—2 Q 900 138 931 934
281 160 957
387 7078 181 19020
420 371 192 15306 274
412 471 280 25—-20 27$ 20‘
403 4 W I 355 8!) 426
490 —20 629 511 106—*29 261 20
'SBB 701—2;» 092—20 119 470
008 729—20 732—700 347—20 534
721 751 755 460 580
77u 766 750 599 «|4
898 8.10 7m) 624 20 052
853 9)0 79J 631 055
910 912—20 835 053 093
988 983 851—20 602 720
4015 882 710 808
31 8021 Oil) 833 814
129 220 077 903
201 301 yi7
323 300 12011 992
369 819 *4l
436 SOU 62 10020
501 411 99 83
The undersigned, as a Board of Visitors at the draw,
ing of the Milledgeville Street Lottery, held at the-
Court-llouse in Baldwin county, and town of Milledge
villc, on Saturday, the 11 111 day of May, 1833, state
that we saw tiic wheel duly unlocked at the commence
ment of said Drawing, and that we saw them also duly
locked at the conclusion of said Drawing. Given un
der our hands, this the UtU day of May, 1833.
JESSE POPE,
JOHN WOOTAN,
* JOHN W. HAY.
The list examined aud corrected by Joseph SfovaJ/
James F. Smith and A. G. Raiford, Ksqrs. ’
Isy order of the Board
PRYOR WRIGHT,
• *cretnry io the( ’ommissionew.