Below is the OCR text representation for this newspapers page.

£ No. 149 .Vol XXII. v - SAVURMr EVENING, JULY 10, 1824 Whole No 4469 m tali lfd'rl ento ES. bed jiy jUTtioiurr. A.N cr. , . rev ive, amend and continue in force an act entitled an act, to exta-nd the lime of tu ■ out grants on surveys made on head rights Phnurttv warrants. V it enaotid by the Senate and House of He- Lntntives uf the state «jf Georgia, in General Imblv met, and it is hereby enacted try the Inritv of'the safde. That where a-y person or , 'have heretofore had surveys made on ■ iirhis, bounty warrants and grants there m . not been obtained, it shall and may be law Lr such person or persons, to apply for and | n .soW-gnui» w».«nu. aeaoy ..time, pre- i to the 2.5th tif October, i824, on payment ,c usual fees ,, lc 2 And be it further enacted by the :*u [tv aforesaid, That where any surveys have lorore been made on head rights or bounty T,. ts d grants theveon have not been ob ,1 such land shall nut be subjeot to a re. ey until three months from and after the on or persons claiming under the original ev shall have been notified that such re-sur- is intended to be made, a V that in all eases, jierson or persons claiming under the ongi- kurvey, shall be entitled to the preference l iking such re-survey, until the expiration |ree months frmn the time of such notifica- , and iu the event of there bein* no claim- .esiding on or near the land to be thbs re- Lved, such notice shall be perfected by giv- Inee months notice |>y public advertiseine t, [e Court Uouse of tue county where such jnii.y lie, and in one of tile public Gazettes 13 And be it further enacted, That it shall ,, duty of ah surveyors who shall make any Fre-sumy. to, certify on his return to the i yor General, that due notice according to provisions of this act bail been given, an Vain obtained ob such at-survey shall be va- JmlnSs feCObmpa'iied with 9ucli eertificute i lidid, nothing in this act shall affect ilu L i.f orphans or peisons under tlieage of 21 V, and that all such .persons shall he allowed y hr after they arrive at the age of 21 years |k<: out their grunts. |e 4 And e it further enacted, That it shall le duty of the Governor.to cause this act to lulhislied in one of the newapapei9 io Md | vi|le, Augusta und BaVunnah, once in each m, until Hie expiration of the time appoint lie same for taking otit grunts. S fhd be it ioi.tlier enacted, that all law*. Iparl* of laws militating against this act be the same are hereby repealed. DAVf» AI)AMS, [ fpeakcr oftliu House nl'biuireseutatlves THOMAS STOCKS, i'resideid of the Senate, knted to. Dec. 2,1823. • G.M. Tl;OUt\ ‘ Governor. Testimony and Documents, ON THb MEMO . I ,VL < >E NlMAN iiuWAUUS [tONTIMUKO ] Sl.fU •vhs heforegolngto.be published monthly )v. next, in the ••Odhstittttjjmalist” and nah Ittnublican,” ■ io, '■ • - - .. •;. [Nov toft irch.J rater tj Bon. Ninutn Edwards sworn by order oj the Committee, Q by Mi Livingston. You staled in an deamination before a funner eo'iimit'ce in y<pir answer to the 8lh interrogatory, ihat you hail prevailed upon Cul .Stephensun to write ujttiter to the Secretary ot the'IVea tiiiry relative tn llif prop iety ol uoniuu- mg deposited of public money in the l)ank ol KtlwartUville, arid that yam saw him write the letter, and enclose a publication made by you therein. The committee wish to k ow whether y u cad that letter im mediately after it was written, and, more particularly than is sta etl in that deposi (iun.what cashed between yourself and Col. Stephenson on that occasion. A. The circumstances und“.r which it Was written werd these} Col. Siephanson Wbs, at that time, the Receiver of Public Moneys, and also the President of the Bank. He wus very ui.wi ling that I should withdraw from the B.mk, and sup posed tnat .«.y doing so Would be likely to impair ita credit, and increase the respon sibility upon him for the deposits in it. 1 was myself glad of the opportunity of cir- tuinstances so, favorable to my advising him with success to write the letter to the Secretary, and he was very easily prevail ed upon to do so, and applied io me tu write such ;i letter for him, as I thought lie 'ought to write to the Secretary} and I ac ct.rdingly wrote the draft of such letter— Went to his office—remained there until he had copied it, and afterwards compared tlm copy, made by him with the draft. At 'll • same time that he wrote the letter, he enclosed, to be. sent witit it, as 1 believe was hts intention,,a printed copy of my publication announcing mv intention to withdraw torn the Bunk of Edwardsville. I have no dnubMhni ho sent the letter.be* cause from the conversation I hid witii him, it appeared to be his desi elo send it, so far as i could discove.; and his subse quent cohversuti'iu left no doubt on my rtiuyl tha' he did send it I have no recol lection of having seen the original draft nbnvementiuned from the time it was copied by UbhStephenson until the lime of my late return io Hdwatdsville. It was tlteh shown to me by Thus. Lippituui, who wav employed in doing business in the Land Office, arid who took it in my piesence from'atnoug tiiefiles of that . fiic.e, The copy nftW presented was mode out, I think, by himself, and is either sworn or ..fiinned tons a tauo one. Mr Lippincot is a gentle man of fair and respectable character, and as I u .d'T'.taod and believe.-was secretary or clerk to one brunch of the last legitia of Illinois. Although I cannot swear that this is a liter-.il copy of tye original draft, I know it to b? substantially correct, not have I the 'cast doubt of its being literally so. Upon the original draft, as found iin the files of thfe office, was an endorsement, in the hamf writing of Mr Stephenson, the tyords uf which Were, a« far its I recollect', the fo|!«win»: " Vupy to the Treasury De A I havei Q. Was the copy for that publication furnished by you ? A. I vubinit to che commit ee whether that is a voper question, [Mr Pm »yih here stated that ho had a tiling of this, however, was done wi'h a view to show Mr. Ciawfmd the danger to gnve'iiineut of continuing (he depnsitos in th it bank, but rather to induce him not to draw upon it at that particular time. The difficulties uf- ttie bank I cooftiilcred. a' pantculni reason for making the - inquiry. IK time, but temnorory i l thought it could bu Cite lc ter as published contains a put t in inducted through them, and did not feel my it»lir«i whinl. ... Sr-lt at Idlt rtV to wil*”> ** - 1 -' L italics which corresponds to tlie port un dersepred in the copy nuw presented 5 and he wished to ask whether the types of the publication .were set from this copy ? A I have no objection to answer, provi- ded’the comoiitlee tltink it a pmpei ques tion. Tins copy is that fr in which 1 sup- jose flic publication was made, as it was I’urni-hed by myself for that purpose. Q II w long wus it out uf your hands; A. Not more than adgy or two, as well as I c n recollect. Q. Was it sent to the Editors of tho pa* >pr i" which it was published, or was it tie- ivered personally ? W I tlo not recollect which. My im pression is, t delivered it to some person to take it to, the printers—probably Mr Cook, Whoever took it, 1 consider the act as equivalent to a personal delivery of i' by myself. Q. ‘I)id you search, or cause search iobe made, in the office of the Receiver at Ktl wiirdsville, for' tlie answer of the Tieasttry Department to tho Igttei of which you now piesent a copy? *d I went to the office for the special purpose of endeavoring to ascertain inhere was m>t a letter in it from Mi Crawford to the la'e Receiver, directing him to contin ue the deposites in »lte Bank of Edwards- villc. Q Did you find the answer to the letter the i iperior Cou’t—Chatham County. loh'u Hetan ~) I tw. ^ Rifle Nisi. fluu Itttkcr 3 I tic p i.ion i.f Jno. ltctsa stating that kiithS'i baker died on tfie first d'jy of May L the better to secure thb payment oi liis |u prooilsmvy nolo ol' tliat date for the sum i thousand dollars, ' uyabte to tile said .lohn , or ,.rder, on or before the tlay gf 11824, witli iotbrest at 7 percent perao- |by his indenture, tinder his seal, bearing Ihe day and year first aforeaoid, mortg'iged > said John Hetan, all the undivided moiety teS'um Sy t df^!5&l>!i e kS?n 'zzz'fM 'ztv ,ine u * [iStinguished in the plan thereof by ,!ie P fn tme>lt, Wct. lSlD, oi woid- to th.it ef- F - - - leef. An addrioiialreason which induces me to believe thal the letter was o s r. I l lit)'I sdto'l er one (1) Tyrcimnell tyihiog Oarby ward, her with the appurtenances, and further “ that the said promissory npte remains unpaid, and the said morteaife>.in full and pniyilig the foreclosure of the said t»ge. --•* ' i. , > |inotion of \V. W. Gordon, attorney for the aner, it is ordered that the said Nathan lla- > pay into this court, within twelve months i ifatc,' the principal and interest due on id note ai)d live costs of the said application, default thereof, tliat the equity of rodemp f the said Nalhai\ Baker of and to the auid agt d premises, be thenceforth and forever mbia. I uJtnoi M of flfJti will I I. CCO.I I it is further ordered, that a copy oi this be served on lire said Nathan Baker, at least [innths before the time appointed for the ent ofsaid money into court, or published e of the public Gazettes of this slate, at once iii every month, unlil the time ,ap. ed for the payment thereof, and that such pj* and other proceedings be hud as are ribed by, tlie statute in such case made and ; frotn the minutes this 24th May, 1824. A. u; FANNIN, , ( i Clerk r 27 \ m ii niy I Valuable Medicine. ippi lied I ,,f I y\ On Oi' ■ e of G’ 1 ! lonisl' vs gj fany'i t rati"" uf J" or b 1 ! lettcs ne of 'l of [), c c “ I tong' n ri yat 1.1 lip that' tore, -.am 1 ,i! tional * u < comp^;] iale «r P* pe «,i j the Uq ANTI DI8P P I IC PILLS, Prepared by Henry James. [approved remedy for Dyspepsia, or Indi pstion, IJahiiual C'-ttiveness, and Piles ? well known that Dyspepsia,is one of the frequent and formidable diseases of our ^ Its commencement is'indicated in difr tients by various sympkoma, of which st remarkublc are^- k . Igularity of the bowels, obstinate costive- peadach, commonly called nervous or sick, jdach, yellowness of the eyes and skin, * |of stomach after eating, often called heart flatulence or wind on ,t|)e stomach, bitter Mhe mouth in the morning, foclid breath, pt alter dinner, debility, lassitude,' e (‘on. depression of spirits, &o. I s being connected with indigestibn and r jjjjji are certainly and spedily removed PPly of the shove valuable Medicine has : H received frora the Patentee, and ban I'ncdofihe subscribem, who have been agents for the State of Georgia. / LAY ft HENDIUCKSON, lists and Chemists,Shad's Buildings, ' Savannah. 124., ca9$ sent, is, that tin* sti<l Mr Lippincot also shewed me the copy of'nn'-ther let ei whiidv he took from the files of (he office, wjtirlt wasin the hand writing of Cul. 5itc#en on, the late Receiver, and purported to be u letter from the said Receiver to “Mr Crawford, dated, I think, the 22d Oct, 1819, which, ft om the subject of it, appears to refer to the before de»cl ibeil le'tei . Q by Mr Forsy!!). Was (here nny part of the oiiginal draft of tin*letter from Mr Stephenson of Oct^lS,. l8t9. undeiscoml? A. I do md recollect that there waa I prpccive that there is an.underscoring ton' part of the copy now presented, which may have been done in consequence of the ob jectfor which this copy was taken; Which, originally, was not that it might be sworn to, but that it might be published. It was sworn to subsequently to the arrival of the summons from this Committee to myself. Q. by Mr Forsyth. Was that underscor ing made by you, oral your request? A. I do not think.it was made by me and I do nof: remember that it was made at my request. Ido suppose it was made by -thegentleman w|in took the.cnpy, and that it was done by him in consequence of hik' knowledge of my object in searching for the letter. - ; Q^y Mr ForsytH. You say that you perceive a partof the copy is underscored II this the’first time you have noticed the circumstances? ti A Ido not recollect , noticing it hereto 4 fore,.* but think it is highly probable that I did, as file copy was intendei) for pub iication, and 4 this is a point to which 1 should naturally haye Wished to call the a c attention, and of which wish the eman who matte the copy was well apprizgjj; . , Q liy Mr Forsyth, Your belief is that this uiiflcrscoring was dope before theaffi* davit was attached to the copy? A; Such in my belief. 1 have no doubt of,it. _ > ■ t Q. This copy has been Already published H.ivftyou seen th > publication of it in one of the public,newspapers of this city ?, of Tviiich you now pr sent a copy ? Jl I found a letter from Mr Cr of the 6th uf August, 1819 1 think , ther of the 1st of November, of the same lib* rty to withdraw from it until this had been done, which finally was effected, as I con ceive, in a great measure, by my own diiigem management of, and my assistance to the bank- I do not recollect tost I did particularly advise the iteceiveia of Public Money to withoold de- posiusin the Edwardsville Bank at that lime, nor until after I had made my publication iu the St. Louis Enquirer. Q. Aft. t*your publication, and when you'con siurred tlie hank as out of danger, you ihep ad vised (Ik Uecejver to withhblct depOBites? • A Yes. My object in that publication was to free myself from all responsibility for the bank —to state a ha< I believe to be the real truth concerning it, and to lyave the public and the Secretary to judge for themselves, how f-r they could confide in ft without unv responsibility un mv part. Q , You .fate that you enclosed a c py of this publication V* Mr. Crawford; was it accompa nied widi any thing written to him, or simply covered with an envelope, and directed to him f A l think ii was simply enclosed and direct- ed to him, and that nothing was written but the direction. not se« Q. Hid you not write, at Mrs Stephenson's re- .quest, a letter purporting to be from her to the Jg-H-y ef the Treasury, and dated 18th Sept A I submit to the committee whether this is a proper quetttlon I am perfectly willing to’am av er it if they so decide; und I am alao willii.i? to waive the objection i [The Committee having decided that the qhes- tion was a proper one,] A , 1 did wmea letter for Mrs 8tephenson, which I believe she copied, signed, and, I have no Joubt, sent, in reply to a letter from Mr Crawford to Col Stephenson, which was receiv ed during his absence on a journey to Kentucky; - uwforil, and the "oiiginat dralt, which warwtitleir^y of the 6th of August, 1819 l think; ano mysel*, 1 have lately seen on the files of the lie- el*.-*.- C it— « -A !• *.T * M . rtoit'nria nllinn nt U.l,...I• - ceiver’s Office at Edwardsville. year; anil f»ne of April, (probably the 20th.T ,Q' you recollect whether Mr Ste- 1820, The second , f tnese, viz t that of i pnen“°ni was in Etlwarrisville ut the time the 1st of November, it i* my opinion, wa'.!y°“ r publ|e,it|un io the Enquirer appeared? written in ronaiquence of the letter of the! A * ‘ 10 ll0t * Rereiver ofOct. 12th; 1816. ^ You state, iu your examination be f .re the committee of the last Congress, that Col. Stephenson informed you, after he hod written that letter, that he received a letter from the Secretary of the Treasu ry directing him to continue the deposites in the. Bank of Edwardsville In your let ter to the Necrfet .ry, of the 9th Febusrv, 1822, you say that he (meaning Mr htep- iietmon) iiiffined von that, that letter hud been answered, i wish to know exactly wlwt the declaration made to you by Mr Stephenson was; whether lie said lie had received an anewer to the letter, or wheth er he sa’d he had received a letter direct Q. After your publication, and before the writing ol this letter of Mr Stephenson's, which you. liege to have been written, you knew that complaints had been made, tin the part of the Treasury, of his withholding deposites of public moneys in his hands? A. I oave no knowledge of having seen or heard n "« *n„. ...i.: .. . .. • "is him to continue the deposites in the Edwardsville Bank? Jl. The letter o[.the 12th prtober was written previouslv to my coming on toCon- gress. On my return from Congress, af ter the Nesaion succeeding the date of this letter; I asked the Receiver what answer Mr Crawford had given to that letter.— He told me. eitlie that he had received a letter from Mr Ciuwford directing him to continue the deposites, or that Mr Craw ford had written to him directing him to do so; from which I understood bjm that he had received an answer from Mr Crawford. I -tin positive lie told me that he ,hBd re neived a letter from Mr Crawford, direct ing him to continue, the deposites; but, whether he alluded to the letter of the 1st November, 1819, or to that of the 20th April, 18^0, or to any other letter in par titular, I do not know; for 1 do not recol lect to -.ive seen either of these letters ftom Mr.Crawford until my late return to Edwartlgville. Q. Did not you enntider that letter winch you draft d for Mr. Stephenson, as a letter from the Receiver of Public Mo neys to the Secretary of the Treasury? It was certainly a letter from the Re ceiver of Public Moneys, but he was, ai the same time, Piesident of the B tok of Edwardkvillb. I perceive, from the copy, it is dated at the "Receiver’s Office.” f know that the Receiver’s letter was writ ten from the draft alluded to. Q. You state that you returned from Congress in the spring of 1819, and found the Bank of Edwardsville under great pressure. 1 wish to know whether you ap prised the Secretary of the Treasury that such was the fact, or ltd vised the Receiv er of Public Moneys to withhold deposites in that bank on account of it ? Jl. I do not recollect, that I did write directly to the Secretary myself; bqt I am under an impression that the President of the bapk did write him a lerter, the object of which was toiuduce huji to forbeardraw- .ing upon the bank while it wap under dif ticulty. I mhde a communication to Col. Johnson, during that summer, whose bro ther, in law held more stock iu the bank than any other person, of the difficulties with Which the bank was then struggling, and; with a view that, he should, and the expectation that, he would, communicate e h® e » ^y 'nv own ft the same to Mr. Crawibrd- l ani induced 1° lt, | fobfilie^ethathedid so, ; from a letter from Mi*. Crawford’to Col. Johnson, of the/15th Juiy, 1819, which l now submit tp the,coth- mitfee, and which acknowledges the re ceipt of a communication from me to C<>| Johnson, upon the subject alluded to. No any thing on that subject, saving the letter whirl; arrived at EuwardKVille directed to Cul Stephenson, during his ab sence. Q. Do yo U< or not, know that, before or ebou* the time of this transaction, iu the spr ng, summer, or fall of 1819, Col. Ste phenson had loaned large sums of money to different individual* ? A* I do not recol lee of knowing or hear ing of any such loans by him. A list, I uii- derstood, was found after his death, of mo ney*. loaned; but this was subsequent to the time mentioned in the question, nor do I remember hearing the name of more than one individual to wlinrti it was then ascer tained he had loaned money. Q.You insinuate, in your memorial to Congress, that there oasa letter written by M Crawfti'd to the. Receiver at Edwards ville, w'.lth was, in reullity an answer to the letter alleged to by you to have been written by Mr Stephenson, but which was so contrived as to appear not to b> such an answer; can you assign any conceivable motive which could lead to auch a course on the part of M Ciawfmd at that time? A Mr Crawford, as I believe, had recei ved much information against the Bank at Edwardsville, some of which appears it rhe documents, ai d particularly the letter of ihe B k of Missouri, dated, I think, 9th. This was naturally calculated to excjte his fearsfm the safety of the deposites; my withdrawal from the .bank was calculated to confirm thore fears; and I think it highly probable that he mightv' Ot have been wit- l-ngto disclose any circumstance which was calculated to increase his responsibili ty for continuing those deposites in that bank ; and I believe thoki deposites were continued there more through (he influence of Gen. Payne and his connections, than from that of any other persons, Q- i understand you, then to say that Mr Crawford at that .time anticipated the fail ure of that bank, anu sought to provide a screen from thp responsibility of having continued the p'ihjlc deposites there. A. My opinion is, that ihe did receive priy publication and the Receiver’s letter, and that he has withheld them, and I have al ready assigned the motive which I suppos ed might have governed him in doing so; but whether tlTftt insulted- from an actual anticipation uf the failure of, the bank or front an apprehension only, that it migh' fail, I do not undertake to decide- Q Yoti state that you determined to sus tain that bank, and you lay great stress on tH the circumstance ot your withdrawal from it; will you state how you were enabled to sustain it? A*! endeavored,to sustain it by my irifiu tance, if it had -equiied it. * Q. When you * .tied tliat you did thed aft of the Rcceivcr'sleMer ur.-tif»« ymir Uteieturn toEdwaidsville,”ilii| you tifuaft your return in April or May lost ? A. I did. Q Did you see-that draft after it was copied by the Receiver and examined, and previously twits being taken from the files,, by Mr Lippincott? i A. Not that 4'ecol!eot. Q Was a letter-book kept in the office of the Receiver at Edwatdsvillc;. A.' ( believe there, is.' Q. Is this letter from the Receiver cop ied in thgt book ? A I think that, in the letter-book I saw, that letter does not appear, There are al so other letters, and one or more I think from Mr Crawford, which are on the files in the office, which are not recorded in <»he book 1 examined, or if they were I did not see them. Q. Are theie any of the letters from the Receiver to the Department of the Treas ury, of the same year with the alleged let ter, which are not recorded in that book? I include Mrs. Steveusun’s letter in this question A. My examination, of the letter-book was sp slight, that 1 cannot pretend to say whether it wak so of not. 1 do not rec ol lect whether Mrs. Sievenson’s letter ap- bpars upon the letter-book or not:- It is my impression that Mr Crawford's letter.of tho 1st of November, 18l9, is not reco.dpd in the buck tliat I saw ; though I canuot speak with certainty about it. Q. Were you not engaged, prior to your ou.ney to Edwardsville, in preparing a publication with respect to these duett- 1 tnents against Mr Crawfurd ? A. To that question 1 positively object. My communication to the House is here ; it speaks for itself; it cannot be material when, or where, it was written [Tha Committee decided he was noY bou"d to answer.J Q. You hove stated in yopr communica tion to the House of Representatives that you are the author of the A. B. publicationn which atecunpained your address; are you , not also the author of the other A. B. pub- lications which appeared either before or since in the Washington Republican against the Secretary of the Treasury. A To tliat question l olijcct to answer. Y am answerable only for those A. B uublications which I have acknowledged. (The- committei decided that he was not bound to' answer.) Q. Have von not.Mt another time, denied your being the author of the said A. B. publications, which you now avow t A- To th's question I alao object to answer. [The committee decided that lie was not bound to answer ) (?. Tlie packet I now present to you con tains the driginul address presented by you.to the House of Hepreseo)ativcs: Will you pleuho to sepai ate those parts of tliat address which. ,« were sent io this city by mail, from those part3 n hich were supplied after its arrival here ?. A. Tlie communication is before t[ic IJousa as n whole; and as a • liole was referred to this committee 1 do not feel myselfunder any ob-" ligation to state lidw its several parts got here. [Tlie committee decided that he was Hot bound to answer.) • ;• t • Q. 1 wisli to knbw whethet; yop are not tha . auilit r < f the printed letter now shewn to yob, . and which is contained in the Washington’,Gu- zetteof tlie'24tli l!eccmbef,*18T,.anddaied the 1 12th oftli.ii month, and purporting to be written by a gentlemai. in Ohio L. ‘A. I do not consider mysplf bound to answer . the question, unless the committee ahull so di- . rect me; (The' mmitteedecided that fie was not bound >, tom s s» Q .. . u the author of all those A. B. pub lications which accompany, your memorial to Congress ? A. Iam , ’ Q. ft ere not the materials of your memorial to. Congress collected and prepared bv you be fore you had seen that letter of Mr. Ctawfi-rd io Congress which yeu alleg.- to be the ground of tliat memorial t 5 f A 1 had i.o intention last session of attacking Mr Crawford unless it should be necessary ; ti» my own detet ce, or unless 1 .myself had been , attacked—I liad no knowlc.'ge of Mr Crawford’s report until the mbrning after it was made. A copy of ft w;w then brought to ro'y room by; Mr Cook,inconsequence uftwliich .1 changed my determination to have left liere on tli.n day and tndeuvqred theft tt> collect such documents asl thought miglit be useful to me in case I, Should . reply to it. Not one word ot my addres- to the house Was written in the Coy, of Washington,' . nor have J any recollection of having conversed on the subject of 'Mr Crawford’s report, but wi'h three members ofthe House af Kepresen- tatives, viz M. Cook, Colonel Moore, and Mr ( amnbell of Uliio I left the .city the oexi day, the 24ib, v Phout any settled plan of answering it, and, with the aid of no other materials than those I collected here in the city, and my own memory * In %aking tbe tieferehces, which are ence'Vby mv own funds, and by uiy pe son*. Q. Ditl you make any deposite about that tiinb with a view to sustain it‘? and ifsu, to whatfmount ? < A. I aided it by advancing my own mo ney or bills; but camint say to wfiat amount. I held myself ready togiyc i^fgrtlier asais- which contaii ed a reference to thos< documents. I;occasionaliy made some notes op my. i journey '■ v '*-' J ing, v here my Add. ess was written^ ■.. 1.! *1. ..I. •«' „i..o rAitt t n Vltin rtiVnL and from whioh place ft w .s sent to this city— and l expect the documents referred tu by Mr Eor^yth, as hairing been furnished here, were obtained by Mr Coolc, to whom I wrpte'for that * * purpose. I regretted the oecfssKy that I. felt myselfunder townie at ail, and ytouid not have done So, itlcouUi havetioppd, by.any itiore pa cific means, that wobld not.have been degrading to have obtainefta wiihdrawal i.-f au insinuation which l conceived was calculated to injure me. Every single)thing used in.roy address t'o» thb ’■ House w-as cdlfecteci from a mass of mv own pri vate papers, -and' by' i wo- friends as (hey'could gap them else.* he. e, after the report of Mr L>\Vford tvpa i-rn^itsd.. .Th'eve things, ... jjOCHfi' ■ i.." [y- -JXS tc ft. 1 m m. •w