Below is the OCR text representation for this newspapers page.

•;&* 1 * ■Mi , eon* Tress to the House was written, Q Did you not, immediately after Mr Craw- f(.- ,i’j report was made*»;Congress. and ttWbM you left this city, state to Mr Campbell, ot'Ohio, that vou then had twenty nr thirty pages pre- iko-s'I ag-iinst Mr Crawford? Mate What conver- s.ui'.n took place between yott anti ilr. Camp- . bj.ll, .on that sohji-ct . , ' . . .? I think it was tm the morning I leu this city, that l met with Mr Campbell, who intro- duced a conversation concerning this report of Mr. Crawford’s, by asking me whether 1 had " seen the report, and appeared, From the remark* which he made, to consirter that report* its con taining an attack uponrme. He spoke of its be- mg presented at so late a period of the session. to the course of the conversation, I mention* ed t<k.him, that l considered it, on this last ac- V.iuid, a* being very ungenerous, or words to tiiat effect. I stated to him that 1 had, during last summer, received information that I was to be attacked at the then ensuing session of Con- KM-sss arfcl l think it is probable I suted t him the particulars of that information. Thinking it s iv probable that l may have stated it, I will now repeat what tlte information was. In trav elling through Kentucky last summer, In Ilua. aetsrille, I received a confidential communica tion from'Virginia, stating that I was to be at- tacked, as is before alleged; that Gov Coles, of Minot', Was ,-xpected to co-operate in the attack, i d advising me to come on a week or two b'ToreUie meeting oTCongress, to be pre pared hr it. lit consequence of this inlorma- • lion- and not expecting to return homo for •'•me considerable time, I wrote to Mr Cook to call upon Gov. Coles upon the subject. And ‘have since seeii n correspondence between Mr. C»ok hi d *lr. Cole-, on the kobicct, which I mention, Mokiuae it affords to any-win* may be inclined to make a further inquiry, the means of ascertain- ing the troth of the Act. Under sn-expectation 11nis produced, Iliad been engaged in writing, 1 ■ - and in preparing for the warf .re-which I ex pected u aa to come on, and 1 believe t stated that tact to Mr. Campbell. IVru.w that J alluded V it, in speaking to him, but there is nothing copied into my address that 1 had previously written with that view. In consequence of thr impr. -siou which Mr Campbell's conversation fifr up<in my mind, that he thought I orght to tv»s- cr Mr Ctawford’s -tatrmeui, I wrote hack to him, while on my journey, that I siiould dot so -the first leisure time I got, ami intimated that I did not expect to occupy more th to three h.'ur- in.doing it f J.i not know whether he received the letter, but 1 expect that He did Q Did von not stale, in that conversation, to M Campbell, tiiat you had written (tveaijr or thirtyqwgea mgtffost Mr- Cratv- funl which ym» could not complete uftliK Jyuugd- to Wheeling, lor want of docu- nurii's which yon expected tn fi id there? } a. i dll not eco'lect that I made such a ?ii.eut o M Campbrll; but I think i oi ule sotun allusion to what 1 li»«l written, *!-tf. stated'some things, in general term could reach New Origins about the 15th of May; bin iv>it w:is fft cu-lamiy; and, t think sho had not arrived.' . „ • Q. You say it was ejected ” What d volt mean by that expression ? A. I waited upon the President, in con sequence of a wish he had expressed for my early departure; and, ih conversation with him, he requested me to go to the Se cretary of the Navy, and ibquire about a vessel to carry tno out on the mission. 1 called on the Secretary of the Navy, who called iu Oounulore Rogers to coneu't up- on the suiQCt^sndj from them, I under stooiltthat Hie vessel, in which it was con- eluded I should go, had not arrived, but was, shortly thereafter, expected. Coin Rodgers spoke of some repairs which would have to be made upon a vessel; made some calculation* ae to the time these repairs end the voyage to New Orleans Would take; and. in this way. *• it was estimated that ihe vessel could probably reach New Or leans by the middle of Mny.or between that time and the t*t of June.” Q You stopped at Wheeling, then, in stead of at Washington for your own per- sonal convenience r A I left here because it was necessary to attend to my business at Baltimore, and a part of my business at Wheeling, which was in the route to my own home, that I intended to visit previous to my departure. Q. I see, by referring <o your Address, that, in addition to the numeets of the Washington, Republican, there are ten numbered documents, from No.l to No. 10. Were not all these documentsiti jour pos sesion at the time Mr Crawford’s report was made to Congress? A. They-ware not. I had oo expects tinn of such an attack as was contained in Mi Crawford's report—and had made no preparation in anticipation of such an at tack as constitutes the subject of that re port in relation to myself. Q. Which of these documents were then in your possession? . AirXhsd No, eleven (ll}—I had, also, Nn f—Ihad the paper from which No. 3 is taken —all among tny pane's, but hut collected for any purpose of attack. I may have had some of ihein in the published documents but, I think I had,at that titne, none of diosedocuments in my possession. I was preparing to leave the city, and, if I had had any printed documents but tny own. presume 1 must have returned them; and, my own, (had sent to Mr. Cook. Nu lling was collected or prepared for the Admitting.my preMiaUm* to meet, and Hu- j subject of my memorial, or to be used for •fer‘itiinatio:i tv repel, an attack that I had ary such prorpftsejUU after Mr Cook fur nished roe-Hte copy of the report. Q Did you send your address by from Wheel in-? «x;*ect:d o'dtFIntve Ueen made upon me; tfii '. I cannot suppose that 1 could have at* •ted’ti him any thing like preparation hir Wie pi ticolar casern Mr Crawford’s report, wii.cb was aiiRifty uuexpscted to mr. Q. by M- F«r*v"th. in one of Ihe A- B. publications,which ompuny yuui memo,' rial to tb<*House of tteiiresentatives, you r efer-t arirsiwtH-wt i cL csUiog'thirpublic at tcition to suppression* by 'he Secretary of T'essury, which produced an mvestig.v mad the Treasury, which prV tion in that tlosse. Do v«o allude, in this pa t ofiyour publication, tu the snide which was the foitndsttou of what you eail. ia your add eif, the A. B. phd ? ■ £THe Committee d cided that this ques- it«*fww> ins-imissiMi-J Question by~ Mr rVsyth, When did Jai * *rh iVafidingi after leaving this city, on the 44lli of March last ? '/ Answer My impression is, that I arriv- V'd 1'iere uq die first Sunday in April, W.h'.yh .was 'he 4ih day oft hat month. Q Wliei* dill yob leave Wheeling ? A I. have no distinct recollection of the jv -vi-' 1 A»y, hut tniak it was on or about WS—f April. ,Q Did jus apple to the President of .the rted States nr the Secretary of State be fore ynu left Wa-hington,for permission to '. t reioain here, for a short time, for the pur- «fdefending ymiraeif f om the accu- tcarion wfuch yna und&rstood Mr Crawford tobave brought against you ? A. l.did not- 1 have never seen the Pres- ide<tt;«nce I saw the report of Mr Craw foj4 jo Congress. Q Was there any ‘-hing in your instruc- tio i* whjch prevented you from remaining in. Wasbiogton'which did ont vqii illy ap‘ p»y m y mr retaaioing at Wheeling, on tuis Aw.mesi? A. I had no Written instructions at that- tiaj. Bat the President had 'sprewd giy at anxiety that ( should get iff as s .oi, AST'saible—and the arrangement was, that 1 •diosld leave this city. *o as to attend to ay uvrnburiars-i. tnd be ready to meet the vessel at Near Orleans net the 1st of. June pt farthest, which was to cariy me out- In conformity to which, I left this city on the ®4‘b; went to Baltimore to settle ^ome pri v*te business, sad, also, today in some ar tides which ( intended .to take to Mexico. I af- /vWards went to Wheeling, where I »!*« hid.private buriitent t* attend t«-con aeeted witka part of my busiuess in‘BsUi mono. Q Y et knew then, that you, weie not ex- purred to leave the Coiled States till the ts< Jane. A- T**e arrangetBent wa«, that I should reach New Orleans by the 1st of June at farthest—aad this Jen me but little time. - , COb«d«rw*g the extent of my business, to qrrittge hay private affairs, preparatory to ..;>jgai , »g;|o Meitco. t did not believe, at the fime, nw do I yet believe, that the Presi- deat farivafd have consented to ipr staying fur the purpose suggested by Mr Eprsy th. - Q. Wasnot the vessel in which you were dqea»birk,.^a jiJ^burse of preparation far * he-^fWge. (irhpa you left this city ? A. vfilte vessel had arrived here, I did itc It .iraa expected that she f The Committee decided this to be an inilirnner question j Q. D • y-»u know when that Address ar rived in Washington? A I do not know, but presume it must have arrived hero the latter part of the week before it wa* presented to Congress- After it was writen in pyrt,it was detained for -owe time, with the hope that I should have been able toi bttin a document I avail ted, from the residence of the Hon. M Ruggles, about ten miles from Wheeling —to which residence I sent twice to pro cure it. It was kept open from the para to j*aph preceding the last on pige 24 of the printed address. ( Had intended to have pursued the subject farther at that time; but,from indisposition, from the want of the document I desired, and from my anxiety not to be longer detained, I concluded no to do so and { referred to the ABpublica tiona in consequence thereof. I had to have a copy of it made, which would of itself, have occasioned some delay, and this wa- increased by waiting for the document a bote alluded to. I sent on the copy of such part as was ready, as I believe, the mail before the original was forwarded. I think I enclosed it to Mr Cook. When 1 left Wheeling, my intention was, to avail my selfbf the earliest opportunity of making an additional defence: and I did not ex pect .to be able to make a full defence un til I could reach Kdataidsville, where ! hoped to find some of the documents that would establi-h t!-e truth of my statements. Oh e*.j journay, at Siiawneemwn, in FI Uiiois, 1 found my publication of 1819 announcing my intention to retire from the Bank of Ed'wArdsvilie, from which place I transmitted that publication this city; and after my arrival at Ed wardsvde, F wrote another address the House of Representatives, and had obtained documents to accompany it, which I was prepared to transmit when the Sergeant at Arms arrived at try house —intending, if Congress bail adjourned, to get the same inserted in the National Intelligencer, if 1 could. Q. Did you transmit the original of your addre-s by mail ? ar d, if so, whendid you put it into the post office at Wheeling? A. I did.hot pul it.into the post office myself; 1 gave it to a gentleman to put in forme—the post office being at a consid erable distance from my lodgings—and I expect he did so, in time for its arrival b^re in the latter part of the week before it was presented to Congress. Q. Who wgs that gentleman ? A. It was some one of the gentlemen a- bout the house where I stayed, but 1 do' not recojlect which one. Q- On what day of your stay at Wheel ing, did you deliver it to him ? At. ( have no recul lection except from the calculation which { thing l then made as to the probable time of its arrival here, sod I. therefore, suppose it must have been about the lOfhor !2th of the moittli. arrive the latter part of lliat week ? ’] 4. I knew from the time l delivered it to be put in.the mail, that it couid not at- rive before that time—and I intended it should arrive by the due course of mail. Q. Do you know when the topy of your Address was finished ? A. ( do not know the particular day} but I think that the copy, so far as one was made, was sent on by the first mail afte> it was finished. And lhat it* was sent in the mail before the’original was sent- Q Please to read this address in the Washington Republican of January 20, 1823, signed A B, and addressed to Gales & Seaton. I* that the publication t< which you refer in one of the A B publications communicated with your AddreBS, (paged- of that Address ) A- It ia Q Werey-m not just about to leave Ed- wvdsville when the messenger fiom the House of Representatives arrii ed ? A 1 expected I should have left it for New Orleans in About three days Q Do) you find, in your examination of the office of the Receiver, any lettei from the Secretary of the Treasury, t<- which that conversation could possibly refer, which you had With Mr Stephen son* after your return from Congress, respecting the letter he is -aid to have written on 12th October, except the let ters of the first of November, 1819, and the 20th April, 1820? A 1 did not Q I remind you that in the 4th quar. ter af 1819, there was a deposite of up. ward* of £50,000, made by Mr Step henson, in the Bank ofEdwardsville.and I ask you whether you think it possi ble he could have referred in that con versatinn. to the letter of the 20th of April) 1820? A. At the time of that conversation I did not know what depositee he. had made after 12th October, 1819 nor to what amount. I think it pos-iblo he may have referred to the letter of April, 1820, al though l consider that the letter of the 1st November, 1819 was t e letter writ ten in consequence of the R ceiver’- Irt- ter of tho 12th October preceding. The letter of November directB the Receiver to deposite the money he should have in his hands nu the last day of the month, iu the Bank of Edwarilsvi1lc ;but I think it contains no express order in regard to future deposites A letter of the same date was written by Mr Crawford to the Csshier of thut bank, with an enclosure, and the paper I hove presented to the committee was delivered to me by the cashier of bank , as being that enclosure, from which it would appear that both the Receiver at Kaskaskie and at Edwards ville had been directed to make their fu ture deposites iu the Bank of Missouri, until otherwise ordered And it appears by the letter of the 20th, April, that the Receiver fit Edwardsville’ was specially directed to make his deposits in the Bank of Edwardaville, Being the Presi dent of the Bank, to the cashier of which the letter was' directed, he may have sup nosed he was bound to take notice of the information which it U natural to suppose he must have received concerning the or der contained in that enclosure. But these are all circumstances which have come to tny knowledge since -tlte conversation al luded to, and I cannot undertake to say what Irtter it was the Receiver referred to in that conversation, Q. Do you know that in January amt Februa ry, 18.0, notwithstanding this circumstance, he lid make deposites inthe Itank of Gd-vardsville? A I do not. I was at Congress during the time spoken of, and I have no recollection of having known at.y thing al that time concerning his deposites; all I know on the subject is from reee t publications. I am under the impression that, during the winter succeeding the letter of 1st November, either Col Johnson or myself was written to on the subject of the enclosure above spoken of, but my recollection is so indistinct that I cannot speak with any certainty about it. Qt It is stated in an account current of Benj Stephenson with the United States, printed with Mr Crawford’s publication, ordered to be printed on the 11th of May, No 13, that there was cash depos'ted in the dank of Edwardaville, on the 31st January, 18-0, amounting to £2,526 82, and in another account, No 14, that there was cash deposited in r the same bank, by Ste phenson, on the 29th February, £2,881. If these statements are true do yqu now think it q, Does it emttairt any direction to the He. v tVe. 'io dcpoiitc mumya n, .lift lia: k of Mi souril . .YTthinf not. I have already stated that I believe it is silent as to his futu>• deposite, afu , the one therein specially refe> red-to. Q. The letter to the ltecc-ivei ,'of 1st Novem ber, and the enclosure of which top speak, dif fer in this respect. That part of the ci.closur, which relates to the Bank of Missouri, is not found ia the litter to the lleceiver. Is there not this difference f A The letter which I saw at the Land Office at Kdwurdsvid- from’ Mr. Cray,ford to the Ue ceiver, of Nov. 1st, 18 9, I feel confident con tains no directions to make' the deposite in tin Hunk uf Missouri, but is silent, as 1 have before stated, as to future depos'tes. Q. Could the Receiver, ifhe had seen this en closure, have doubted about the propriety of continuing his deposites, with the letter of 1st Nov in Ins hands? A I think lie could. Q In giving your advice to the Receiv er inMlte Fall of 1819, did you give it in the character of his friend* or as a person holding a high place in the government, with a view to promote the public interest ? A; At that time 1 had lost confidence'll) banks generally, so much so that 1 did not with to be heldrcopossible lor any bank.— I advised, the Receiver as a friend to him, and also with a view to free myself of all esponsibility fur the bank, by placing things in such a situation that Mr Craw ford could act in the case as lie should think fit on his own responsibility, leaving the funds in the Receiver’s hands entirely to his control. [T<» be Continued.2 Latest and impoitnnt from Spain.— We are informed by out uifentlyit corres pondent of the Boston Courier, that the ship Coral arrived at that port on Sunday last, from Gibraltar, bringing letters from Cadiz, dated the 22d of May. In one of these it was stated as certain that 25 000 troops were to enter^ Spain immediately, and tiiat severnl regiments had been urder ed from Carthagena to Cadiz, where pre paratic.ns were making to receive them. “The movements (it is added) m Spain with the recent events in Portugal, lend many to believe that all is not well,' and that war is brewingV jy. Y. Evening Post. jig ..• FREDERICK S, FELL, ctrt eiURTKn. V UAL. SAVANNAHY *ATUR»>Y EVENING, JULY- io l8 ,| iril " -'ft. skilW- The i-.Bsis drums at the diptier. tV . j ville. Liberty Couirty,*mthe 5th in.t L'll •eceived, aud shall appear in uur nett. ^ The Baltimore Morning Chronicle , transferred to Mr. William Pechin. f 1 veteran at tho bnnines*, having been the ri, etor and publisher, many years ago, of the i! more American, The Chronicle hRsbecnj* Ionian. MrPcchis, we understand, " to make it an independent print. prop- * Not a word from Washington has been s bout Edwards returning the £ 11,225, f ur , he has rendered mv service. Would it well for the Attorney General-of the States to commence a suit against the «. t ter for the recovery ofthis money f Mr. Crawford left Washington on the nit, on his wsy to tlis North. Ills speedy a tation to perfe l health is now certiun l llK j] will be 4bie to tak , upon •himself thr high <U the people sre about calling upon him toperfd with a renovated constitution, ^ Yellow Fever.—A strong case, in proof that the Yellow Fever is contagious, is given in the London papers, in'the chse of the British vessel of war, (be Banm She went from Sierra Leona with 107 E trot peons, iu apparent gobd health,*and before her arrival at the island of Assenaion, where she was bound, she lost 13, and af terwards 20, by the ywllow lever—and 99 were seized with it She found the islami in health, and there had been no death tor two years. Soon after she arrived the Yel low Fever broke out, and of 20 men in one fort, 16 died, besides 4 women and 5 child ren. Selected frcm Tontit drank on the FOURTH OF JULY. At St Aunnsw's Parmu Gklkbiutiox Jj The St Andrew’s Company, enpt Smith, nssemblcd at their mutter i whence they walked in procession to the' accompanied by visitors from Churlestc Oration complete ‘with ardent patriotiin finished eh.quenae, was delivered by Mn lip*, Esq The procession then returned tot In- House, a sslu e of twenty-four guns wm and at 3 o’clock the party sat down to an lent dintiei provided for the occasion Among the tonsil drunk mere the fothuinf, d partment, has saved millions of dollars tm United Mates , Albert Gallatin - The experienced and profound fi-inncier; the fVlen’ tliU fell nL bottrer of Jeff' rson and Madlcdii.in th«c*J Republicanism. In this' lan'd of equal right), meets opposition as a.candidatn for iSe t Presidency, because *nit a .Ydtive " The ( stitutlou makes i.o surh distinction, the nti fri-wn onitsiUtberabiy , v r- • > Ottr~Kx SinUtbr, Judge Smith.—Me has cl the state -ome ser iCt> i’he mist w.ilchfan has contrived to throw around him will sodu dissipated, and he will appear in ids true li^iv Having heretofore had occasion to tqen lion the state of Mr Secretary Chawford’*. heallh.it may be proper to say, that he re moved, with his family, yesterday, to «i country residence, three miles f>otn the City; that he is rapidly recovering, and expects to set out in* day or iwn on a jour ney, from which the complete re-establish ment of his hfcallh is confide-fly anticipa ted. JYat. Int 1st June. the Missouri question, be w.-s lumve'.Vohj anil his • t piitr\ is anxious Id vu.du tee itsU< fi the chm-tr-.-of iii;:ratitude totvaids him. J\finian.Ediaaid*,- tb icrgus of the Tree It is t- him we t o mdub'ed for the investip into the,conduct of tie Secr .Ury of the Tr ry, tl»r resiittoF which has terminated so i oly to Mr C'rswjnWl and the nntiou ! IVm K Crawford— Like the Quaker’^ pence, the harddr he is rubbed the brig shines . |j I’UIU.IO SENMAtSmi rostorI The Washington light iufun.ry CompMj.l Boston Statc-Bman represents, ‘*ffiunp9«.fI most entirely of Republican young men, J through good and through evil report, lot and in peace. i<s members have always sup?, ed the constituted admici-trutnrs of air iuhm| government.’ paraded in One Hundred Thousand Dollar Prize. Various have been the person’s named, as the holdor-t of the great prizo of One II,in dred 'Thousand Dollars, drawn ou Thurs day last in the Grand State Lottery, and citizens Were invited llr Ingalls preaidedj anl.t in oh.r a . ■» M.d.» Diltno sisted by Col. Gerry Fairbanks, David Hem sold in shares at Messrs. Cohens’ 'Office. We are now enabled tb inform uur renders, that one of the shares (n quarter^ is owned jointly by Mr. A. Hickerson hod 3«>hn H Clarke of Fauquier County Virginia, wlto oo their arrival in town yesterday after noon, realized their good fortune by re ceiving the cash at MesservCohens’ Office, on presentation of their ticket. Baltimore Jim’r. 2nd inlt. possible that the letter of the 20th April was ihe letter alluded to in that conversation before mentions with Stephenson? , A 1 still think it oossible. Hi* own letter be ing silent on tlte subject of the future deposites, he may have thought that that would iiave justi fied him in continuing to make those deposites; and yet, from the enclosure above referred to, Mr Crawford may have intended to prohibit their being made there I have already stated that my-impression is, thatCol. Johnson, or my self,^-received aletter on the subject of that en- closure, and 1 supose the enclosure and the Re ceiver’s letter together may have occasioned the latter some uncertainty how he waste act. 2 You speak of your impressions concerning a letter to yourself or Col Johnson. By whom was that letter written? A. My ympremnn is that it was written by the President of t he Bank, who was also the receiv- Q* You iutetided, then, that it should ji. jxjy, ef. Col Johnson’s brother-in-law holding a ve ry large portion of the stockof that bank, he has been principally relied upon for some years past to mske all negotiations with Mr Crawford concerning it tiiat nave been made here, snd-we have generally, had conversation upon the sub ject when he has had to act in those cases. If I received the letter, no doubt it was communica ted to him; and if he received one, ;t is equally probable that it wits shewn to me : Q- Do you know that Uie Receiver at Ed- war.Jsville ever saw that pappr, catted the en closure in the letter of 1st Nov ? . A Of my own knowledge, I do not, but-I should think it very strange if he had not seen it, he being the Presid-nt'ofthe Bank. Q- In examining the records in the Receiver’s office, did you see a letter from Mr.. Craw ford of the 1st November? ' Public indignation.—Di.vid and Robert Shields have be**n tried at Pafis. (Ky.) for the murder of M’Cormatyk. Contrary , to all expectation, they were pronounced not guilty! The trial occupied nine day-.— The Muysville Eagle speaking of this re suit, says, “our respect for the great- palla dium of personal liberty, (the trial by ju ry) induces as. to forbear comment qjuch, however; is the strengthref public feelirij; in Bourbon, that on Friday night last, the jurors were buried in effigy, and the Rogue's March beat over the grave. CHARLESTON, July 8. FIRE.—The sloop I/apiil, Capt Swa SEYj lying at Gibb* <Sj" Hurper’s warf, was discovered to be on fire about. 3 o’clock yesterday morning—fire sopposed to have communicated through the foundation of the chimney in the forecastle; Every ex ertion was made to.extinguish the fames, but in vain—they spread so fast that it was impossible to save any tiling except, some of the sails apd rigging. firm, enlightened and independent cinte-J c Missouri question, Ik- w.-a him* .” Oh the 14th J.une, tbit ecu; f that city, for the purpoieofre ing a standard iron, their distinguished fclf<i« tiien Dr. William Ingalls, a "firm k undrvisj democrat ” Afi^sr tlie coi)cln*ion of the mony.tiie company partook of apelegante tainment r.t Concert Hall, to which alviui and Andrew Dunlap, Esqrs au Vice Presi^j Among the guests Wire the Mayor of llo> Chief Justice Parker, the Hon. William I of Bath, Hon Ashur Ware, of Portland, I Triifton, ed Uapgor, and ltarney.aiitith r “ Among the roasts drank on the ofcasiwl obsi rve the following: National 'Peeling* and National PirtnaA Mai they never be surrendered to local prej Ces, or ’* e Vacriticed i o family aggrandisemu' H'm H. Crawford- lie has.been faitbW every trust; ra«v his rewards equalHVmr wi //• Crav'foril—Hia tongue in nott.' - f lytic to speck trniA, -nor his ; cs too buw nisiinguish b> tween love of country and lonl «//’.. . ... | Win. II. Cro-ir/orJ—The school-mMtcJ Georgia; may lie. soon have the United •' for his tchool, and the citizen* for h' s ,,A yVtn. U. Crawford— \ bii,,ht dtampletop_ lie officers ; his official performances IimJ critical investigation of a well appointed Scr4 nizing Committee—should fate close his I death, which may heaven avert, his /riendi >■ carefully femould him from Clay. We have a strong presentiment, though f indications at present do not seem to just'fjj that another resignation will take place «r the Presidential candidates, and that Mr will reap the benefit of it. If our oonjef should be realised, the election will to cert go to the House of Represedtatives, and « we do not think he can be elected, it bnn'J probable that he will- obtain his full prof 1 uf the 24 voted.—’Nerfttk Herald, The Pilot Boot Gazette returned thin morning, having cruised upwards of 600 miles east and west in search of the ship Delta, from Savannah, withuut success. The steam boat Nautilus, chartered for the purpose, went to sea last evening in pursuitofthe ship Delta, which lost her rudder on Cape Hatteras ^Capt. Rogers, of the Canada, navigator.. ( ,. . . , { Jf. Y;QaHi QOtAu/t. SHIP WK W8: PQRT OF SAVANNA?!. Anniyxu, Schr Flora, Tom$rson, Rieeboro, 2 days- E L ship Louisa Matil^ ,Wood^Nev Vj>J Brig Ocean, Marshall, New Yo&, •'" J®" Tbs ship Louisa Matilda* erased the JW m. ■ iv 0 , i ( ; V , 4 Brig Panthea, Bradley, NewYorV- jgj Schr. Panppe, Norris, Charleston,