Weekly constitutionalist. (Augusta, Ga.) 185?-1877, May 13, 1868, Image 1
She Wccldn (Constitutionalist
BY STOCKTON & CO,
OUR. TERMS.
The following are the rates of Subscription:
Daily, one year $lO 00
Weekly, one year I 3 00
The Answer.
BY JOHN G. WHITTIER.
Spare me, dread angel of reproof.
And let the sunshiae weave to-day
Its gold-threads in the warp and woof
Os life so poor and gray.
Spare me a while ; the flesh is weak;
These lingering feet, that fain would stray
Among the'flowers, shall some day seek
The straight and narrow way.
Take off thy ever watchful eye,
- The awe of thy rebuking frown ;
The dullest slave at times must sigh
To fling his burdens down.
To drop hie galley's etrsining oar,
And press, in summer warmth and calm.
The lap of some enchanted shore
Os blossoms and of balm. ,
Grudge not my life its hour of bloom,
My> eart its taste ot long desire;
This day be mine; be those to come
As duty shall require.
The deep voice answered to my own,
Strutting my selfish prayers away;
To morrow is with God alone,
And man hath but to-day.
“ Say not thy fond, vain heart within,
The Father’s arms shall still be wide
When from these pleasant ways of sin
Thou turn’st at eventide.”
“Cast thyself down,” the tempter saith,
“ And angels shall thy feet upbear;”
He bids thee make a life of faith,
A blasphemy of prayer.
Though God be good, and free be Heaven,
No force divine can love compel;
And, though the song of sins forgiven
May sound through lowest hell.
The sweet persuasion of Hie voice
Respects thy sanctity of will;
He giveth day; thou hast thy choice
To walk in darkness still.
As one who, turning from the light,
Watches his own gray shadow fail.
Doubting upon his path of night,
If there be day at all 1
No word of doom may shut thee out,
No wind of wrath may downward whirl,
No swords of fire keep watch about
The open gates of pearl.
A tenderer light than moon or sun,
Than song of earth a sweeter hymn,
May shine and sound forever on,
And then be deaf and dim.
Forever round the Mercy seat
The guiding lights of Love shall burn ;
But what, if habit bound, thy feet
Shall lack the will to turn I
What if thine eye refuse to see,
Thine ear of Heaven’s free welcome fall,
And thou a willing captive be,
Thyself thy own dark jail ?
O, doom beyond the saddest guess,
As the long years of God unroll,
To make they dreary selfishness
The prison of a soul I
To doubt the love that fain would break
The fetters from thy self-bound limb :
And dream that God can thee forsake
As thou forsakest him I
Little Giffen.
The following beautiful and touching poem, written
bv Dr. F. O. Tichnor of Columbus, Ga., is taken
from that excellent periodical, “ The Land We Love.”
The writer hopes tha- the following lines may em
body as much poetry as truth, for they are, he fears,
the sole monument to
LITTLE GIFFEN.
Out of the focal and foremost fire—
Out of the hospital, walls as dire;
Smitten of grapeshot and gangrene,
(Eighteenth battle, and fie sixteen ;)
Spectre, such as you seldom see—
Little Giffen, of Tennessee i
“ Take him, and welcome 1” the surgeon said;
“Much your doctor can help the dead 1”
And so we took him, and brought him where
The balm was sweet on the summer air;
And we laid him down on a wholesome bed
Utter Lazarus, heels to head.
Weary war, with the bated breath,
Skeleton boy against skeleton death ;
Months of torture, how many such I
Weary weeks of the stick and crutch I
Still a glint in the steel-blue eye
Spoke of a spirit ihat wouldn't die 1
And didn’t —nay more I in death’s despite,
The crippled skeleton learned to write 1
“ Dear mother,” at first, of course, and then,
“ Dear Captain,” inquiring about the “men.”
(Captain’s answer:) “Os eighty and five,
Giffen and I are left alive.”
Johnston's pressed at the fiont, they say;
Little Giffen was up and away 1
A tear, his first, as he hade good-bye,
Dimmed the glint of his steel-blue eye;
J’U write, if spared!" ’I here was news of fight,
But none of Giffen—he did not write 1
I sometimes fancy that when I’m king,
And my gallant courtiers form a ring,
And each so thoughtless of power and pelf,
And each so loyal to all but self,
I’d give the best, on his bended knee—
Yea, barter the whole for the loyalty—
Os little Giffen, of Tennessee I
Flowers on the Battle-Field.
BY H. ». MORTON.
One tranquil eve in May alone I wandered,
Where late had pealed the solemn notes of war ;
All strife had ceised—no sights of discord rising,
The holy beauty of the scene to mar.
Peace reigned o’er all. The rosy smile of evening
In glory lingered on the earth and sky ;
Sweet were the vesper-hyms the birds were trilling,
And soft the music of the South wind’s sigh.
Around me lay the grim and ghastly trophies
Which Death, the conqueror, had won from Life ;
The ruined shrines of man’s immortal spirit,
Cold, trampled, shattered, on tre field of strife I
But lo! as if with tenderness concealing
The blighting ills which War’s dark angels bring,
O’er shells and human skulls were gently bending
The bursting buds and fragrant flowers of Spring.
And thus in mute, though eloquent appealing,
Doth Nature speak unto the human heart,
Whose passions strew with wrecks our world of
beauty,
And only woe and wretchedness impart.
Thus doth she symbal forth that radiant future,
When white-robed Charity shall lead the van,
And Peace he victor in the march of Progress,
And guileless Love the perfect law of man.
When war is known no more among the nations,
And buried all shall belts blood-stained spears;
When Want and Famine stalk no more in noonday,
And cease the widows’ and the orphans’ tears;
When o’er the dark and melancholy ruins
By human folly, human passion wrought,
Shall b'oom to hide their dreariness forever
The fadeless flowers of Mercy and of Thought 1
HA seven-year old boy was lately heard to
use profane language. On being reproved
by his parents, and directed to ask God’s
forgiveness, he retired to his room and was
overheard to say: “ Oh, God, I am very
sorry 1 said that naughty word, and won’t
say it any more ; but please hurry and make
me grow up to be a man and then I can
■wear as much as I want to, like pa, and
nobody will notice it.”
[From the National lntelligencer.
The Alta Vela Matter—lnfamous Conduct
of the Impeachers;
We find the following in the Washington
correspondence of the New York Tribune-.
“ Judge Nelson, in his argument in the sum
ming up to-day, took occasion to advert to a
certain recommendation by General Butler on
the Alta Vela case. The paper was written
some time before the impeachment proceed
ings were initiated, and had no date whatever
affixed.”
This is a feeble effort by a positive mis
representation of the fact to avoid the
odium attaching to the conduct of those
who were engaged in the transaction al
luded to. The allusion to it by Mr. Nelson
was elicited by a remark of Mr. Manager
Boutwell in regard to the abandonment of
the President by Judge Black, who was
originally one of the counsel for the de
fense. The exposure of the affair, made
with careful delicacy by Mr. Nelson, start
led honorable Senators, and occasioned
earnest inquiry as to the facts. A simple
recital of tfcese is sufficient to exhibit the
disgraceful charactei - of the whole affair.
They’ are as follows:
The ttnpeachinent resolutions were passed
in the House, and the managers appointed
February 24th.
The articles of impeachment were laid
before the Senate March 2d.
The summons to appear and answer on
March 13th was served upon the President
March 7th.
On the 9th of March the following letter,
dated of that date, and signed by four of
the managers of impeachment—Butler, Lo
gan, Thad. Stevens and Bingham—was de
livered to the President by Chauncey
Black, Esq., a son and law partner of Judge
Black, strongly urging immediate action
by the President in regard to the Alta Vela
case, of such nature as to amount to an
actval declaration of war against St. Do
mingo.
Again, on the 16th of March a copy ot
the same letter, dated March 9th, with the
additional names of Messrs. Garfield,
Koontz, Blaine and Moorhead, the willing
witness for the prosecution, was delivered
to the President by Judge Black.
During all this period Judge Black was
acting as one of the counsel for the Presi
dent, and in such capacity conferred with
the other counsel for the defense, and ac
tually prepared a portion of the President’s
answer to the articles of impeachment.
The copy of the letter of March 9th,
which was delivered to the President
March 16th, is as follows:
“ Washington, March 9,1868.
“ Col. J. W. Shaffer, Washington, D. C.:
“ Dear Sir : In answer to your question re
lating to the validity of the claim ot tbe United
States to the jurisdiction over the island of Alta
Vela, upon considerable consideration ot tbe >
subject, I am clearly’ of opinion that, under tbe
claim of the United States, its citizens have the
exclusive right to take guano there.
“This is clearly indisputable, both by the law
of nations and our municipal law. I have never
been able to understand why the Executive did
not long since assert tbe rights of the Govern
ment, and sustain the rightful claims of its citi
zens to the possession of the island in tbe most
forcible manner consistent with the dignity and
honor of the nation. I am, yours truly,
“ Benj. F. Butler.”
“ I concur in the opinion expressed above by
Gen. Butler. John A. Logan.
“And we concur i J. A. Garfield, Thaddeus
Stevens, W. H. Koontz, J. G. Blaine, W. Moor
bead, John A. Bingham.”
Col. Shaffer, to whom this letter is ad
dressed, was formerly chief of staff to Gen.
Butler, and is now counsel for the Alta
Vela claimants.
At the time of delivering this letter,
(March 16,) Judge Black urged with great
earnestness immediate action in the pre
mises ; but the President, at this same in
terview, firmly and positively declined to
act in the matter, and Judge Black with
drew, evidently offended at the refusal. On
the 19th of March Judge Black transmitted
to the President his letter of that date,
withdrawing from the defense of the im
peachment case. On the 22d of March he
sent a second letter, of that date explaining
his action, and subsequently another of a
later date of the same tenor. In the mean
time the counsel had inquired of the Navy
Department the mode of procedure in re
ference to sending United States war vessels
upon such service as was desired, and
urged this information to strengthen his
appeal to the President for immediate ac
tion. The President felt most keenly the
desertion of Judge Black, and only the allu
sion to it made by Manager Boutwell would
have induced any reference to the details of
the circumstances.
This is a plain, unvarnished statement of
the facts. It will be seen that this letter of
the managers and. witnesses for the prose
cution, urging the President, under the
menace of desertion by his counsel, to do,
at that moment and under existing circum
stances, an act of at least very questionable
propriety, at any time, was not, as stated
by the Tribune correspondent, written
“ some time before the impeachment pro
ceedings were initiated, and without date,”
but was actually dated and written after
the summons to the President to appear
and answer had been served upon him, and
that another copy of the letter, with addi
tional signatures, was delivered to him after
his appearance by counsel to defend himself
against the charges exhibited against him
by these very managers, whose signatures
are appended to the letter.
Comment upon these facts is not needed
to show the character of this transaction,
in which it appears that the principal pros
ecutors of the President, having charge of
the prosecution against him, and actually
engaged in it, are found endeavoring to
take advantage of their relative position
towards the accused to compel his assist
ance in carrying out an immense lobby
scheme, failing in which, they proceeded to
push the prosecution with a degree of vin
dictiveness attributable only to personal
rancor, instead of devotion to public duty.
It will hardly be credited anywhere that
the man who had the firmness and unswerv
ing fidelity to duty to decline, as Mr. John
son did, such overtures from his prosecu
tors under such circumstances can be guil
ty of any of the charges made against him,
or be injured in any way by the malevo
lence ot the prosecution, unmistakably
prompted by his refusal to aid its managers
by the unlawful use of executive power in
promoting their great lobby scheme.
The spectacle is presented of men prose
cuting articles of impeachment against the
President for acts of the most trivial char
acter, and at the same time urging him to
the commission of an act which would
be clearly and undeniably a usurpation on
*
AUGUSTA, GA., WEDNESDAY MORNING, MAY 13, 1868.
his part of the war-making power of Con
gress while that body is in session, for
which he would have been justly liable to
impeachment and conviction.
[From the New York Times (Rep.), 24th.
Belief from Disabilties.
The Constitutional Convention of Geor
gia has appointed Messrs. Blodgett and Par
rott a committee to visit Washington and
confer with the Republican leaders on ques
tions of importance to the party in the State.
The presentation of certain names whom
the convention recommended for relief from
political disabilities, was one of the duties
with which they were charged; and thus
they refer to it in a published address to
their constituents:
“ Congressmen seem to be somewhat cau
tious about relieving persons in rebel States
from political disabilities, and we are in
duced to believe that very few, if any, will
be finally relieved until our election is over
and it is known how the election has gone,
and how those desiring and needing relief
have stood in the contest.
“ We are assured by leading men in both
Houses of Congress, and high officials in the
military and judicial departments of the
Government, that should Georgia ratify the
constitution and elect sound Union recon
structionists—the regular nominees of the
party— to fill the offices of the new govern
ment, there will be no difficulty in having
any true and worthy man, who used his influ
ence to bring about that result, relieved from all
disabilities. Any man who may be elected
to office on the reconstruction ticket, and
can show that he supported in good faith
the ratification of the constitution, and sus
tained the regular candidates of the party in
the election, will be relieved in time for him
to enter upon the discharge of the duties of
his office. While this is true, we also deem
it proper to state that from what we are
told by controlling members of the domi
nant party iu Congress, it will be entirely
useless for any man to aspire to official po
sition who is ineligible under existing laws;
for such will not be relieved, nor allowed
to hold office, if he opposes restoration or the
friends of reconstruction.'"
What is this, freely interpreted, but a
declaration that the continuince or re
moval of disabilities is a matter to be man
aged with exclusive reference to partisan
considerations ? As a question of justice,
it is not recognized. As a measure largely
entering into the permanent pacification of
the South, it has no place in Congressional
counsels. The only aspect in which it is
entertained is that of a recompense or re
ward, to be doled out with sinister intent
by a partisan majority. Those of the
Southern whites who vote for the ticket
presented by the convention, and for the
constitution it has constructed, will have a
chance of obtaining the party favor. They
may be freed from disfranchisement and
made again eligible for office. Al! others
must make up their minds to remain out in
the cold.
It will be of no avail, evidently, that men
are able honestly to avow themselves favor
able to the Union, or to reconstruction ac
cording to the law, if they are not prepared
to endorse, without reservation or qualifi
cation, the whole work of the convention.
They may plead—as Judge Irwin might
plead—a consistent Union record before,
during and since the war; yet, if they con
demn the provisions of the proposed consti
tution which are intended to prevent the
collection of debts, or if they oppose the
candidates with doubtful reputation who
appear in some instances as nominees of
the convention, they will seek in vain for
relief. To obtain a hearing at Washington,
those who though excluded from office are
not disfranchised, must show that they
swear by whatever the convention has said
and done; w’hile those who have neither
the franchise nor eligibility to office, must
be in a condition to prove that they shouted
loudly for the convention, and helped to
execute its commands.
The case is stated explicitly and emphat
ically. None will be relieved who “ op
poses restoration or the friends of recon
struction ” —the latter comprising the entire
Hunnicut family. On the other hand, any
man who can present the certificate of the
managers of the convention as to his party
zeal and orthodoxy, “ will be relieved in
time for him to enter upon the discharge of
the duties of his office.” The threat and
the-promise are sent forth together; bribe
and punishment are held up in juxtaposi
tion as keys to the position which the party
leaders who for the time control reconstruc
tion have takeff in regard to disabilities.
The exhibition*was scarcely needed after
the discussion which took place recently in
the House ; but it is opportune because of
the light it throws upon the close relations
which exist between the present tactics of
the Southern extremists and the ulterior
purposes of Congress.
The assurances given to Messrs. Blodgett
and Parrott could not be limited to Geor
gia. They are published as applicable to
the whole South. The title to relief, then,
is declared to be party fealty ; and the test
of party fealty is the thick-and-thin support
of everything done by the conventions and
of every candidate whom the conventions
have respectively set up. The conjunction
proves that Congress will be satisfied witli
.10 half-wav support. With mere Unionism
it will not be content. It requires unadul
terated Radicalism. A discrimination be
tween candidates it will not tolerate. It
exacts votes for candidates of the conven
tion, and opposition to all beside. In Geor
gia the conditions might not be intolerable.
Ih Virginia, however, they involve the in
corporation of the test oath into the con
stitution, and the elevation of a host of
Hunnicutts to local power.
A policy so flagrantly partisan on a ques
tion into which justice so largely enters, is
as unfortunate as it is unwise. Mr. Blod
gett’s own case proves the necessity of lay
ing down some other rule than that which,
for party reasons, he proclaims and ap
plauds. Mr. Butler, in the Court of Im
peachment, eulogized his Unionism—we
dare say deservedly; yet because, as the
captain of a Georgia volunteer company,
he was compelled to serve in the Confeder
ate army, he is under the law ineligible for
office. It is a hard case, Mr. Butler thinks
—and so do we. But it is not harder thau
that of Judge Irwin, whom Gen. Meade
ruled off the track as Conservative candi
date for the Georgia Governorship; nor
harder than the cases of thousands in the
South, whom the law disfranchises and dis
qualifies for some technical—and morally
blameless—participation in the rebellion.
Is it just to consign these men to indefinite
exclusion from the franchise or from office,
unless they join the Radicals, and send ne-
groes or white adventurers to Congress or
the Legislature ? Is it decent to use penal
ties enacted in the name of loyalty as par
tisan appliances, or to degrade and punish
sincere friends of the Union because they
refuse to bow .to the decrees of a conven
tion controlled by negro votes? Is this a
I policy which is likely to promote the only
reconstruction that can last, or even to
strengthen the hold of the Republican par
ty upon the judgment and conscience of
the country, North or South ?
[From the Richmond Ecquirer and Examiner.
The Democratic Nomination for the Presi
dency-
The New York Sun, whose ability is not
questioned, but whose Radical partisanship
is equally we* known, is taking a great
deal of unnecessary trouble to figure up
the “Democratic Prospects” in the Presiden
tial election next fall, and determining who
will be the Democratic nominee. It seems
to have convinced itself at least that Mr.
Pendleton will be the man, and thrown
down the gauntlet of argument to all who
question the accuracy of its calculations.
Now, we do not propose to discuss the con
clusions of the Sun ; that is to say, we are
not prepared to prove that Mr. Pendleton
will not be the nominee, but we do deny the
correctness of the calculation on which the
Sun relies to prove that he will be. For
instance, the entire vote of the Southern
States is put down for Mr. Pendleton, and
failing to find any expression of choice
whatever in the entire South on the subject
of a nominee, the Sun jumps over this diffi
culty at a bound by making the gratuitous
assertion that the Southern delegates “ will
all go for the peace and greenback candi
date in preference to a man who slew their
sons in the war, and who has no platform
at all on tbe all-absorbing question of fi
nance and taxation.”
Now we think that our information in
regard to Southern sentiment is quite as
accurate as the Sun's, and we have no hesi
tation in declaring that the Southern peo
ple are not at all disposed to permit such
feelings as the Sun pretends to suppose ex
ist, but which it is really trying to create,
to exercise any control over the action of
the delegates in the Democratic National
Convention. We will tell the Sun the true
state of the case, and it would be well for
that paper to remember in its future calcu
lations. The Southern people will vote for
any man whom the Northern Democracy
may choose to nominate, whether he be a
so-called Peace Democrat or a so-called
War Democrat. The only questions we
ask are in regard to his course since the
war. If he has supported the Constitution
and the laws thereunder since the war, and
has popularity enough in the North to beat
the Republican candidate, he is our man,
whether his name is Hancock, or Pendle
ton, or McClellan, or anything else. We
are perfectly w'yi!ng to leave “"the all-ab
sorbing questiofi of finance and taxation to
be regulated by a Democratic Administra
tion upon the well-known principles .of
right and justice which have always char
acterized that party. And in considering
all these things we desire to take the
hint suggested in Mrs. Glass’ famous re
cipe for cooking a hare—“ first catch the
hare.” We desire first to get a Democratic
Administration, and everything else can be
attended to afterwards.
In regard to the action of the Democratic
National Convention, our conviction is
that the nomination of that body will be be
stowed upon whomsoever is the dunce of the
Northern Democracy, for we believe that the
Southern delegates will be wise and pru
dent enough to vote en masse for what
ever candidate is known to have a
majority of Northern votes, and we shall
not be surprised if the Democratic nominee
for President is nominated by the unani
mous vote of the convention on the very
first ballot. Does the Sun understand what
that means ?
The Southern people, in common with
the whole country, have too much at stake
upon the issue of the next Presidential
election to permit mere personal feeling for
any man to interfere with the plan of battle
against the revolutionary, proscriptive,
confiscating and general destruction party,
in whose behalf the energies of the Sun are
employed. Let the Sun remember that,
and let it also be informed that when it and
the Tribune, and other such journals want
the Democracy to nominate any particular
man whom they hope the more easily to
beat, the Democracy will be pretty apt for
that reason to nominate some other man
who can the more easily beat them. Does
the Sun understand that ?
A Man Commits Suicide Because His
Wife Kissed Another.—A Mr. Bnced, of
Union City, and who was well known to the
citizens of Memphis, committed suicide by
taking laudanum, a few days ago, under the
following peculiar circumstances: Sneed was
a man forty years old, and had recently mar
ried a young lady of Union City. Having oc
casion to visit Mobile on business, on his re
turn he pressed his wife fondly to his bosom,
kissed her, and expressed satisfaction in know
ing that he was the only man that had ever en
joyed that privilege. Upon which his wile re
plied : “ You are very much mistaken ; I have
kissed divers and sundry men in my life.”—
Sneed replied, in a kind tone, “You told me I
was the only one, and I believed you.” To
this bis wife made answer, “ 1 told you that I
loved ; I have kissed and hugged him of-
ten, and felt just as free with him as if we had
been married.” After this cruel confession,
Sneed wandered about town like one deranged.
He disappeared on Friday morning, and was
found, a short time afterwards, dead, having
committed suicide by taking laudanum.
The Crops.—From all the information we
can get from the farmers of this and the adjoin
ing counties, the wheat is doing very well. The
wet weather made corn planting backward, and
fears were entertained that some of the corn
already planted had rotted, but the clear
weather of tbe past few days has enabled the
farmers to get most of their corn in. Fruits
are doing very well, and from present prospects
there will be a fair yield. In Washington
county, the Jonesboro’ Flag says that about
one-half of the fruit was killed by the frost in
the blossom. This leaves plenty, and will make
the fruit larger and finer, without breaking the
k trees to pieces, as is tbe case when there is a
more prolific crop. The editor of the Flag
says that he has traveled through two-thirds of
the counties of East Tennessee —from Johnson
to Hamilton —and can safely say he never saw a
more excellent prospect in his life tor a splen
did wheat crop, it looks rank and green, and
although thin in some places from being frozen
out by the severe winter, it will only make the
grain larger and better. Unless we have some
unforeseen blight, the wheat harvest will be
most abundant. Although very poor in poli
tics, our readers may safely take his word about
crops.— Chattanooga Union.
[Correspondence of the Charleston Courier.
The Latest Presidential Favorite.
New York, April 25.
Democratic efforts to find a suitable man
to act as the party standard-bearer during
the coming Presidential campaign are tak
ing some shape at last. After having pass
ed in review Pendleton, Seymour, Commo
dore Vanderbilt and General McClellan,
and dismissed one after another from their
thoughts, the leaders, who make the Man
hattan Club their headquarters, have at
last secretly decided upon a candidate, and
he is none other than Senator Hendricks,
from Indiana. The reasons in his favor are,
that although a Western man, he is not bit
ten with the greenback mania, his votes on
this point, in the Senate, having always
been most j udicious. He does neither share
the odium which rests so heavily on Pen
dleton, of having opposed the war during
its progress, neither has he committed any
sins since the close of the war. He is a
man of talent, fine presence, pure personal
character. With Hendricks placed in the
field, the West can take no umbrage at the
non-nomination of Geo. H. Pendleton. After
carefully considering the subject from all
its bearings, the Democratic leaders think
it best to stick to a straight party nomina
tion, leaving all shoulderstraps aud dissat
isfied Republicans to find comfort in the
Radical camp the best way they can. At
the same time they fully appreciate the im
portance of placing on the ticket men who
cannot possibly be objectionable to the
mass of moderate Republicans, now await
ing a chance to vote outside of their own
party. Such a ticket, it is thought, will be
found in the nomination of Senator Hen
dricks, of Indiana, for the Presidency, and
of Governor English, of Connecticut, for
the Vice-Presidency. Governor English
has twice made a most gallant fight in Con
necticut, and he has equal strength in the
great State of New York. His vote while
in Congress, on the abolition of slavery, has
helped him considerably with the Republi
can party, and ever since his elevation to
the gubernatorial chair he h is, by an up
right and fair administration, increased the
number of his Republican friends even in
Radical New England.
Having thus furnished you with the latest
developments in the Democratic inner cir
cles, it will not be out of place to give the
following speculation in regard to the first
ballot as it will take place, with slight va
riations, in the Democratic Convention,
which is to meet in this city on Saturday,
July 4th. I advise your readers to cut it
out, and see how the events will justify the
table hereto annexed, and how easily the
leaders will be enabled to slip in their pre
arranged ticket ns compromise candidates.
For, undoubtedly, the first ballot will be as
follows:
Pendleton. McClellan.
Illinois ...16 Delaware 3
Indiana IS Maine 7
lowa 8 Massachusetts. 12
Kansas 3 New Hampshire.... 5
Kentucky 11 California 5
Michigan 8 Oregon 3
Minnesota 4 Rhode Island 4
Nebraska 3 Vermont 5
Wisconsin 8 Missouri 11
Colorado 3
West Virginia 5
Ohio 21
Nevada ... 3
106 53
Hancock. t Horatio Seymour.
Maryland 7 New York 33
Virginia 10 New Jersey 7
Tennessee 10 Connecticut 6
Alabama 8
Arkansas 5
Louisiana 7
Mississippi 7
North Carolina 9
South Carolina 6
Pennsylvania 26
Texas 6
Florida 3
Georgia 9
115 46
Neither Hancock nor Pendleton can ob
tain the required number of votes in the
Convention. Then will be brought forward
the compromise candidate. Not a man of
the Pendleton stamp, but still a Western
man, and that one with Eastern principles.
Such a man is Senator Hendricks, of Indi
ana. And he will be nominated with the
concurrence of the entire Convention, after
it shall have been demonstrated that neith
er the West nor the East can find any hope
of success for their first choice.
[Woman’s Word Book.
Economy.—Spending five shillings to save
six pence.
Eden.—A garden where bonnets were un
known and scandal uninvented. Woman soon
gave notice to quit.
Employment.—Something that must be
found for the poor.
Engaged.—Occupied for a time in making a
fool of a man.
Enough.—Obsolete.
Eve.—The only woman who never threat
ened to go and live with her mother.
Face.—A sketch given us by Nature to be
filled up in colors.
False.—A stern reality now-a-days— e. g.,
chignons.
Family.—Laurels or olive-branches, as the
case may be.
Fan.—An article without which no lady’s
dress is complete or decent.
Fascination.—The art of nailing an admirer
to bis seat. Part of the Old Serpent’s legacy.
Fashion.—The modern Juggernaut, always
asking for new victims.
Father.—The only author who does not ex
pect his works to pay.
Feather.—The only thing she wants to be
the lightest of creatures.
Female.—As much an insult to a woman as
“ black man ” is to a nigger.
Fiction.—Tales of constancy.
Fig Leaf.—Crinoline before the fall. Eve’s
first dress with a trimming.
Flattery.—A refreshment she can never
have too much of, with or without butter.
Flirtation.—Trotting out the favorites for
the Maiden Stakes.
Future.—Past thinking about for the pre
sent.
I —I
The performance of “ Ten Nights in it Bar
room,” at the theatre in Henry, 111., was an
nounced from the pulpits of that town, and
the respective congregations were recommend
ed to attend.
VOL. 27. NO. 20
Ritualism-
High Church Ritualists and Irish Ro
manists —Letter from the British
Premier.
The following letter, addressed by Mr.
Disraeli to Rev. Arthur Baker, Rector of
Addington, Bucks, a constituent of the
right honorable gentleman, has been for
warded to the London Times for publica
tion :
Hughenden Manor, >
Maundy-Thursday, 1868. )
Reverend Sir : I have just received your
letter, in which, as one of my constituents,
you justify your right to ask for some ex
planation of my alleged assertion that the
High Church Ritualists had been long in
secret combination and were now in open
confederacy with Irish Romanists for the
destruction of the union between Church
and State.
I acknowledge your right of making this
inquiry; and if Ido not notice in detail the
various suggestions in your letter, it is
from no want of courtesy, but from the
necessity of not needlessly involving myself
in literary controversy.
You are under a misapprehension if you
suppose that I intended to cast any slur
upon the High Church party. I have the
highest respect for the High Church party;
I believe there is no body of men in this
country to which we have been more in
debted, from the days of Queen Anne to the
days of Qeen Victoria, for the maintenance
of the orthodox faith, the rights of the
Crown, and the liberties of the people.
In saying this I have no wish to intimate
that the obligations of the country to the
other great party in the Church* are not
equally significant. I have never looked
upon the existence of parties in our Church
as a calamity ; I look upon them as a neces
sity, and a beneficent necessity. They are
the natural and inevitable consequences of
the mild and liberal principles of our eccle
siastical policy, and of the varying and op
posite elements of the human mind and
character.
When I spoke I referred to an extreme
faction in the Church, of very modern date,
that does not conceal its ambition to de
stroy the connection between Church and
State, and which I have reason to believe
Ifss been for some time in secret combina
tion, and is now in open confederacy with
the Irish Romanists for the purpose.
The Liberation Society, with its shallow
and shortsighted fanaticism, is a mere in
strument in the hands of the confederacy,
and will probably be the first victim of the
spiritual despotism the Liberation Society
is now blindly working to establish.
As I hold that the dissolution of the
union between Church and State will cause
permanently a greater revolution in this
country than foreign conquest, I shall use
my utmost energies to defeat these fatal
> machinations.
Believe me, reverend sir, your faithful
member and servant, B. Disraeli.
Rev. Arthur Baker, A. M., Rector of
Addington.
Church Choirs.
Both pastors and organists have hitherto
experienced much trouble and annoyance
with the freaks of operatic or concert ar
tists whom they engaged for their choirs.—
Besides the enormous salaries which these
people demanded, they have been constant
ly in the habit of disappointing their em
ployers, and sending incompetent substi
tutes in their stead whenever some lucra
tive concert engagement»might tempt them
from the church. There is a movement on
foot at present in a large number of the me
tropolitan churches of all denominations,
which will not only remove this evil, but
will considerably accelerate the progress
of music in our midst. It is suggested by
some pastors of churches that the organist
shall, for the future, endeavor to organize a
choir composed of members of the congre
gation alone who may have musical tal
ents. The experiment is one attendant in
the beginning with much difficulty, but is
nevertheless worth a trial. The result of
it, premising, of course, necessary ability,
energy and good will on the part of the
musical director of each choir, will be that,
instead of a single quartette of voices, a
church choir will have a double one, with
a large chorus to assist. A desire to im
prove themselves in music and render them
selves worthy of singing the great works
whica composers in every age have writ
ten for the service of God, will be engen
dered among the young people in every
congregation by the opportunity thus af
forded them. Now, it often happens that
persons who are gifted with excellent
voices and great musical talents are kept
entirely in the background, not wishing to
compete with artists whose names are more
prominently before the public. When they
receive the encouragement that is due to
them, and are properly trained, both pas
tor and organist will be astonished at the
success of their experiment. There is a
mine of musical talent lying perdu in this
city, and this is the only available means
to bring it before the public. The expenses
of a choir will be also considerably lessen
ed by such a course; for volunteers may
be obtained by the dozen who will work
more faithfully in the service of the choir
than any of those extravagantly paid ar
tists who regard the church, opara and
concert as one.— N. Y. Herald.
The Virginia newspapers indicate a move
ment on the part of South Carolinians, and re
sidents of other Southern States, to remove
Northward, with tbe view of escaping negro
supremacy. In Virginia they find the whites
already in the ascendant, and plans are on foot
which point to large accessions of population
in that State from Southern sources. The ob
stacle to migration on an extensive scale is in
ability to sell where they are, and to buy where
they propose to go. Partly to meet this diffl
culty, efforts appear to be making in Virginia
to induce the offer of liberal terms bj’ landed
proprietors; and these efforts are not unsuc
cessful, if we may judge by the reported ar
rivals of new settlers from points further
South.
Chambers' Journal relates an anecdote of an
application received by a lady who had adver
tised for a parlor maid. The person who ap
plied in answer to the advertisement appeared
to be quite satisfactory, but the lady, wishing
to say something kind at parting, remarked
“ 1 am sorry to see by your black dress that
you have been in trouble lately.’.’ “O, no
mum, thank you, not at all,” replied the wo
man ; “ it’s only for my late missus. I have
beetr particularly fortunate in service, mum.
My three last missuses have all died while 1
was with them; so I got mourning give me
every time.” It is hardly necessary to say that
the young woman was not engaged.