Below is the OCR text representation for this newspapers page.

from Mr. liaj s Speech, he. ' the whig committee of one of the wards issued Ex; -a t. from the speech of Mr. Clay, nj Ken- electioneering handbills, calling on the “Native lucky, on the pre-emption bill, delivered in Americans” to put down “ignorant, bloatf.d the Sniati, Wednesday, Januruy (3, 1S41. babble, UNPRINCIPLED Scotch, French non- Mr. Clay saiJ he also believed, bevond the I,Ens > Jew thieves, Dutch and Ir.isn vaga- mouiitains, aliens were allowed to h .)d land ; bo »ds»” and to support a ticket “not POLLU- but he also believed that there was some condi- TED with foreign blood.” lion required in almost .all the States—in some We 'night go on and fill columns with evi- of them a rcsi iencc oftwoor three veurs. Now deuce like this going to show, that this “Native it might be a question whether they should ex- ; Americanism” in its principles and in its action tend the privilege, except to those holding by is iJbt another name for federal whiggery.— state authority—and aliens who hold, are not The whig paper and die whig meeting which entitled to a vote; but he {Mr. Clay) was op- ha= ■ ondemnedthe views and objects with and posed on principle, to the proposition that r ° r "'hieh it has sprung into existence, is yet ALIENS should ha. incited from every portion unknown to us; we have seen none, heard of of the inhabitable globe, to take possession of the | nono > aI, d know of none. public lands, on terms so peculiarly favorable!. AnJ t } » s whig hatred of foreigners is notli- aiwere proposed by this bill. ' ’ mg new. It has existed since the commence- *»***♦ There j n ' ent of •1'° government. The federalists un- was another point, on which thero ought not to l ^ er the administration of Joint Adams passed D i any diversity of opinion. Though it might i ihot^act of infamous immortality—THE A- bc the practice of our government to sell, the soil LIEN LAW—which required a residence of of our country alike to aliens as to citizens, J.fourteen years to qualify foreigners for nature- there should not be extended an invitation t® j l®Mt°n. Jn his first annual message, Prt si- aliens to come and purchase our lands; and yet j dent Jefferson alluded to the law in the follow- uucA wo'(Id be the effect of this bill. | ' n {J terms :— We doubt if the author of such illiberal and j “ I cannotomit recommending a' reversal of tne laws on American sentiments will find much favor T 6 of nntnraliiation. Considering the ordinary anil-American sentiments wniniia muen mvor Uhaoeeaof human life, .denial ofcWswwhip BrfMfouneeo with the naturalized citizens of this country.— i years is adenial toa great proportion of those who ask it; They will find more satisfaction in the iust, and con _ tr °' 8 » p°l'ry pursued from their first settlement by , ! many ot these states.and still believed of consequence IS their prosperity. And shall ice refuse the unhappy fugi- T JE Zr JE a JR P MI. 3IACON: liberal, and magnanimous sentiments of Mr. Buchanan, on the same occasion, uttered in re ply to Mr. Clay: Air. Buchanan, in reply, said: Now, in re gard to aliens, the Senator bus admitted that, from the origin of the Government until the present tims, they have been permitted to pur chase the public lands of the west, either by public sale or by private entry. This fact is incontrovertible. Then why make an odious d sanction against foreigners in this particular care ? If you permit them to purchase in eve ry < il>' r form, why deny to them the privilege of purchasing as pre-emptionors. The alien who flies from oppression at home, and makes his way into the Fur West, and there fixes his habitation, at the same time, places his body as a barrier against the attacks of the savago foe, which your policy has collected on the frontier. Such aliens thus furnish stronger evidence of their fidelity to the country, and of their inten tion to become citizens, than they could do by a mere declaration to this effect under the na turalization law; though he presume-*, such a declaration was made by them in almost eve ry instance, A man who merely does this, may change his intention before he becomes a citizen ; but the man who makes a settlement on the public land, and purchases it from the government, thus identifies his own fate and that of his family, for weal or for wo with our government. From such men wo have noth ing to apprehend. And shall we suffer even the ulien speculator, who has no intention of ever becoming a citizen, to purchase the hum ble dwelling of this poor man and drive him out of possession ? Such might often be the cose, if it were not for your pre-emption laws. For my own part, 1 shall always most cheer fully, as long a I shall be honored with a seat in the Senate, grant this trifling privilege to the actual settler, whether he has emigrated front the old to the new states, to improve his condi tion, or lias fled from oppression in the old world, to live under the protection of our repub lican institutions. [Prom the New England Democrat.] “NATIVE AMERICANISM.” Mr. Archer, a member of the Uuited States Senate from Virginia,andono of the Most ultra whigs in that body, at the last session of Con gress pledged himselfto introduce and advocate the change in the Naturalization Laws which has been proposed by the “Native American Party”—That is, to require a residence of twen ty one years as a qualification for the naturali zation of foreigners. This arbitrary and unjust measure we regard as certain to be carried into effect; should the whigs be successful in the ap proaching election, ns that of a National Bank or the Distribution of the proceeds of the Public Lands. Although it has not been deemed poli tic by the friends of Mr. Clay to commit them selves as a party in its favor, there are signs and evidences enough to satisfyany reasonable mind that it meets with their cordial approval and will be carried into effect whoever they obtain possession of the government. At the late charter election in the city of New York the whigs supported the “Native American” ticket, and it was elected l>y their votes. In Philadelphia the same identity of feeling and opinion exists between the two, and in the lawless acts of violence and bloodshed there was, in n moral point of view, neither se paration nor distinction. The whigs as a par ty had applauded and encouraged the spirit of mnlignant hatred which has actuated and gov erned all the the proceedings of the “Native A- mericans,” and they are and ought to bo held accountable &r the consequcuces. And this is true not only in regard to the wh'gs of Phila delphia and New York, but of Pittsburg and every other place where “Native American ism” has assumed an organized shape. The truth of this position rnay be further il lustrated from the sentiments which daily ap pear in the leading whig papers throughout tii Union. lives from distressthat hospitality ichichthe savages of the wilderness extended to our fathers arriving in ths land1 .Shalloppressed humanity find no asylum on this globe 1 The constitution, indeed, has wisely provided that, for admission to certain offices of important trust, a re sidence (hall be required sufficient to develope character and design. But might not the general character and capa bilities o^t a citizen be safely comma nicsted to every one manifesting a bona fide purpose of embarking his life and fortunes permantly with us V The language of Air. Jefferson spoke the sentiments of every democrat in the Union, and with other oppressive laws of the Adams ad- miuistiation this Alien act was stricken with indignation from the statute book. The fed eralists of our day, it would seem have a deep er hatred of our foreign population than was manifested by their forefathers; and they pro pose to make twenty-one years instead of four teen the necessary term of residence to qualify foreig ners for citizenship. Are the people ready for another ALIEN LAW? Are the blessings of this free govern ment to be denied to the oppressed of the old world? Is this the mission of democracy ?— Are we to erect walls and barriers to shut out the subjects of tyrants and despots who seek our shores to enjoy the rights, the liberty they are denied on their own—the men who in the matter are what we ourselves ouce were, and what we still should be but for the sympathy and aid they extended to us in the days of our adversity 1 Was it to establish feelings and doctrines like these that Lafayette, Steuben, Barry, DeKalb, and a host of illustrious forei gners, fought to establish American indepen dence ? Is it right to require of every foreign er who shall come among us all the duties of citizens and deny them tne rights of citizens ? Shall they pay taxes, perform military service, and in ail other respects be neld liable to do the duties of citizeus, and shall they be denied the most valuable rights of citizens l We appeal to every domocrat in the Union, to every friend of human rights, to every lover ofjustice—above all we appeal to the ADOP TED CITIZENS of this land, who are most nearly interested in this right settlement of this question—to come out and oppose by word, bv influence and by deed the party* who are pre pared and ready to deprive them of the rights and privileges for the very purpose of enjoying which they left their own country and came to this—to establish and secure which to all was the purpose and object of the American Revo- lulion. From the Savannah Georgian. Air. W. S. Archer, the legal and known ex pounder and representative of whig principles in the Senate of the United States, and the a- vowed political friend of the great ‘embodiment’ —Henry Clay—uses the following expressive language, in his late very social correspondence with the “Native American Association” ol New York. “At the ensuing session of Congress I sliail set our ball in motion. It will be driven back for a time, for the slang—“Asylum ot the op pressed of all nations,” is just now ascendant, importing as it really does in all its results, that the oppressed shall be received here without restrain?. “ But we shall subdue the slang. As politi cal men conic to find that they may express their nausea for it with impunity, «$*c. “W. S. ARCHER.” The following is a fresh letter from Mr. Clay. It is, if possible, more explicit in re gard to the Tariff, than his former letter on the same subject. Ashland, 9th September, 1844. “Gentlemen—I this day received your let ter, addressing two inquiries tome—‘1st, Are you in favor of the Tariff Act of 1842’—and •2d, Would you, if elected, support the Act ask is, without modification, or would you be in favor of rQodifying it?’ _ “I have so of.en, gentlemen, expressed my L'lio National YnteUigewer^ thl or- I opinion in favor of the Tariff of ’42, that the gan of whiggery at Washington, in speaking of | on 'y regret I feel is, that you should deem it the New York charter election, to which we ' at a ‘* necessary to request any renewed ex- i rfr | e had pression of it. Nevertheless, 1 take pleasure been one of viktce and vice”—that the “whig con, ply' n S with your request, ill saying that tarty”— hen that! there might ho r.o mistake r.sto the intentions .... whigi: whenever tncy had t;.e power to carry their views into practice, it significantly added, that—“Americans will not allow ANY party to gather around them the MISERABLE, DELUDED, IGNORANT! REFUGEES OF OTHER COUNTRIES.” ; Ami even this language was not plain or bit- ’ ter enough to express all which the Intelligcn- j cer desired to express and wished to have un-! derstood. We q’loto once m re from its col umns:— “ Already ilo we Ceellbe demoralising effects of emigre- • lion. Those foreigners who lmve emigrated to this country tor ihr Inst few veers are of the Inter si "radc of beings.— ,r, TUKY SHOULD UK KXCLUDED FROM PAR TICIPATING IN ELECTIONS.” The Cincinnati Gazette, the leading whig pa- ; per in Ohio, has expressed similar sentimen's in us plain language. It says :— '■ Forei"n emigrants are men whose wants, if not ichose\ the dickcti.,’ such and such places have so great a run of I am of opinion that the operation of the tariff of ’42 has been eminently salutary; that I am di ided/y opposed to its repeal; that I should regard its repeal as a great national calamity, and that I am unaware of the necessity of any modification in it. I am therefore opposed alik e to its repeal or modification. A fixed and stable policy is what the country now most needs, and I sincerely hope that the 1 ariff of 1842 may be maintained, and thus afford a se curity for that desideratum. I am respectfully, Your obedient servant, H. CLAY. Messrs, Miller, Lynch, Donaldson, Moore, Sellers, Blyler, Snyder, PefTer, and Myers. Advertise. There is tf great deal of truth in the follc-wing remarks fr. in the Caiskill Recorder: • t-how us," sets that paper ■•die man among u*>, who is not continually complaining for want of ira<le. ai.d and at the same tims i* wondering ‘how ; Tl’K.SDAV .MOliM.NC, OCTOBER 8. ISO- FOR Pit K SIDE XT, Of VrMHessee* FOR VICE-PRESIDENT, 2Y3, Of I’cnnttjlratiia. Democratic Electoral Ticket. ALFRED IVERSON, of M uscogee. Charles j. McDonald, of Cobb. R. M. CHARLTON, of Chatham. BARZILLAI GRAVES, of Stewart, GEORGE W. TOWNS, of Talbot, WM. F. SAMFORD, of Meriwether, CHARLES MURPHY, of Cass, WM. B. WOFFORD, of Habersham, H. V. JOHNSON, of Baldwin, ELI H. BAXTER, of Hancock. [Elected by General Ticket.J “Under thes ce3sity for the it extremely. •Had yr rself and We are forced to defer the publication of Gen. Tarver’s communication, in vindication ofliimself from the foul charges made in certain quarters a- gainst him, in relation to certain “Northern Whig papers,” subscribed for by bim the past summer. It will appear in our next, and will place the whole matter in atruc light before the public. Poetry. Those of our readers who arc off times frightened at the sight of verses in a newspaper, will find themselves most agreeably disappointed by the pe rusal of the lines in to-day’s columns. They are from an esteemed correspondent, and breathe in terse poetic strains, the burning lore of freedom with the pure spirit of patriotism. ELECTION RETURNS. THE GLORIOUS THIRD ! The following arc the returns, so far as received up to the hour of going to press. Tito democratic gain, it will be seen, although not sufficient to elect Col. Chappell—with the gain in the other counties, are sufficient to show that the constituen cy who elected him—the people of Georgia—would again return him, if the election was in their hands, and not in a district gerrymandered by the whigs. To our friends throughout the State and UnioD, we say be of good cheer. The democrats of the Third District, if beaten, ate not discouraged. The sun of democracy will shine on every battle field in November. We have already reduced a majori ty of 857 down to almost nothing—one. other pul! and we will work that ofF. THIRD DISTRICT. Majorities. Dem. Whig. Pike, 211 Bibb, 123 Twiggs, 103 Crawford, 70 Monroe, 31 U pson. supposed 280 Harris and Talbot, yet to be heard from 1 , which will probably render Poe’s majority fro'm 200 to 250. FIRST DISTRICT. Chatham county—Democratic majority, 10. SECOND DISTRICT. Houston, the only county heard from in this dis trict, gives Jones a majority of 80. FOURTH DISTRICT. Copy of a lettci from Lagrange, Troup county: “All’s well! I send you a list of the polls at this place; no returns frout precincts received yet. .Floyd 550 Harralson, 221-^-335 for Floyd. In 1843 the whig majority was 022. Copy of a letter from Greenville, Meriwether county: “Principles will prevail over party dictation.— We. have sufficient tetums from the different pre- cincts of this county, to give Harralson a majority over Floyd of 250 votes certain. Is not this a triumph over the southern whigs with northern principles.” SEVENTH DISTRICT. majorities. Dem.’ Whig. them their gains on the Pennsylvania line, and thev are defeated. This is a fact which will ena ble any person to draw a correct inference. The" Democratic vote in the State is thousands ; larger than it ever was before, We believe it is larger than any party'ever polled before in the Stale. We are confident that the W bigs have not now the institution ot si the means—we mean the money—to bring as ma ny to the polls in November as they have Drought I up, or bought up, at this election; and that the Dem- j ocrats can defeat them in the State at the l icsidcn- I tial election, if they are vigilant along the lines. ! We have never claimed Maryland ; but this elec- ■ tion lias convinced ns that vigilance and industry I will bring her into the Democratic line, and bring ! Mi - . Clay down to the “forties”—that is, will pre- ! vent him from getting fifty electoral votes. Every Democrat that we have seen is ready and eager for the fight. ireumatnnees, there v e which 1 publish.*.!. hs an absolute '.though I reg-et it as not lo vroi .d 1 hope I did her friends ; be well aw .. ltd have roneurred nking it indispehsahl f the very great de acy of FOll THE TELEGRAPH. Democratic Meeting on Saturday Night. The Democracy of Bibb assembled in full represented as an ultra-sopporter of •y, whilst at the South I am described Abolitionist; when I am neither one nor the other. '•As we have the same sir-name, and are, moreover, related, great cse is made at the Splith against me, of whatever falls from you. There, you are even represented as being my son ; (rerice ihe ne<:es'*iry of the greatest circumspection, and especially that you should avoid committing me. “You are watched wherever you go; and every won! you publicly express will be tortured and perverted as my own are. “After all, T am afraid you are too sanguine in supposing that ffny cpnsiderable number of the liberty men can be in duced to support me. How can that be expected after they have voted against Mr. Slade? “With assurances of thankful ness for your friendly purposes, and with my best respects for Mrs. Clay, fl am truly, and faithfulfv, your friend, * “H. CLAY. “C. M. Clay, Esq." The New York Democrat, in an article introductory ter this letter, saya: myself up aa a teacher'of i snail ’ * T c* i • I u lVcfeel it due to Mr. Cassius M. Cloy to slate, that stren g l ‘i °n Saturday evening last, to welcome | on Saturday afternoon he called atony office in com- Col. S. T. Bailey, who by „ q „o s , of. copy. After perusing it. ana examining the signature thereto, he in the most manly and honorably manner, admitted that it was a genuine letter from Mr. Cloy to Jones county, Baldwin, Wilkinson, 25 lS 212 or more EieilTH DISTRICT* Washington county—Whig majority, 5. From the Federal Union, Extra. Bnldwin Election. The result of the election to-day in this county, for Representative to Congress, from this (7th) District, is— For STEPHENS. (Fed.) 280 “ JANES, (Dem.) 258 Scattering, (Dem.) 4 262; Stephen’s majority, 18 The vote in this county 6tood in October last, be tween Crawford and Cooper for Governor— Majority for Crawford, 62 “ “ Stephens, 18 -* Whig lo<s, 44 votes. The vote to-day is about 100 less thau the usilal poll of the county, a majority of which is Demo cratic. ber of his fellow citizens, addressed them on the present state of parties at the North, and the dan gerous consequences of the alliance between Nor thern and Southerq Wliiggcry. Previous, to his arrival, the meeting was addressed by H.. J. La mar, in a speech replete with sound argument and convincing eloquence, proving himself a “chip of tlie old Block,” and satisfying all that the reputa tion of this talented family had lost nothing in bis debut. Mr. Lantar was interrupted, however, by the arrival of Col. Bailey, and abruptly brought his remarks to a close. Col. Bailey was then loudly called for, and be ing introduced by the Chairman—Col. Henry G. Lamar, gave a detailed statement of his recent ad venture. He portrayed the difficulty he experi enced in obtaining aid to discover where his negro had been concealed. Receiving none from his Whig friends, he applied to strangers, and the first man who carne to his aid was a Magistrate at tached lo the Democratic party. This gentleman, although an officer of the Law, and kuowing full well the hazard he ran, boldly avowed his deter mination to assist him in the recovery of his prop erty, though the penalty if convicted of the offence, was 10 years imprisonment in the Penitentiary of Vermont. With this assistance, on the second day’s seared, they found Col. B’s negro concealed in the garret of a house belonging to an Abolitionist, where she had been carried and was engaged to work for S12 per year. We have not time to follow Col. B’s narrative to < lie end ; it is sufficient for us to state that he was pursued through the New Eng land States by these blood-hounds—his only de fenders, the Democrats, whom he had the good for tune to meet with. Having secured his negro, he returned to .Vermont, where, shortly after he was arrested. And here again the marked distinction between the two parties was most striking. On one hand the Whigs and Abolitionists combined, would have the Sheriff incarcerate him, while he a little more humane, permitted him to enjoy Ins liberty until the Triai. At the trial, the same hos tility on the one side, and warm disinterested friend ship on the other was evinced. Even the Demo crats of that gallant State, New Hampshire, were there, and contended with the spirit of our own dear South for the rights of one ofher children, a stranger to them—but yet bound to them by the lilUly ties of the Union and the Constitution- Col. Bailey was acquitted from the insufficiency of ihb' Jestimony. Nothing else saved him, could they lmvc proved that he had forcibly carried away his slave, (which was the fact,) his conviction and Col. Nutt’s would (five been inevitable. It is to be regretted' .’hat every Whig in'Gcorgia did not hear him ; could they have learned from his lips as we did, all the an.' used to excite public opinion against bim, and not oniV the community generally, but even his aged mother, until she. too was almost ready to believe him guilty pf a hein ous crime, they would have cut asunder the bonds of party and stood up once more for and with’ the South. Col. Bailey then alluded to the efforts made in the last week’s Messenger, to prove that the people of the North were unwilling to disturb the institu tion of slavery. He denied the fact, and stated that in tlirce of the New England States, viz : Ver mont, Massachusetts, anil Connecticut, Laws have been passed, making it penal for any of their citi zens to aid a slaveholder in recovering his properly when it may have "been stolen, or have absconded into one of these states—a right guaranteed to us by the constitution, and which some of their most eminent attorne ys have contended was uull and voijl ; thus virtually enacting Nullification while these base knaves rail at South Catolina, for her disorganizing doctrines. He then briefly alluded to the Texas question, and showed conclusively, that it was the very sal vation of the South and her institutions. He sta ted what he knew, and we all know to be a fact, that opposition to the admission of Texas at the North, atose from their repugnance to any increase of political power at the South, and that all their most intelligent citizens, well knew that the annex ation of Texas, would strengthen and perpetuate slavery, and thus give us greater weight in the councils of the nation. He concluded, by assuring the meeting that so ! long as the Dcmocmtic party pursued tlu-ir pre- i sent course, it should have his vote and support. After Col. Bailey concluded, the meeting ad journed, about 9 o’clock. A SOUTHERNER. him, and that the signature attached therolo uas the genuine signature of Henry Clay. And Mr. M ft rath Site North, And added that they knew the circnstances under which it call i ravc | and tarry the North, ntid '■■not r was sent. With tkesc'circumslanccs’ we have nothing whatsoever to do at present.” seek office nor set political science, I shnit - , • . ~ •— voting with whatever party ^ 1 eve will best secure the ii ter^t 1 i V of the South. Bnt.RemCranowmf j ^ qHOtefl0m *P<*ch of U,e • -Lufus Choate, Senator from Massachu i ;f S '. ‘vereil b. fore the Clay Club of lit ton, in August last. “Does he reflect how v>.-> tintents of civil*— . ' whole sub remember t! . . . five hundred . r . .V Can he no; ft times ? Dot acters traced finished picture the nation hnv England lias do ite not see and fc opinion has l—-- zed wholly new, sight, intolerant Them gentle —the printed se the North and of the ■ .oe blazing char- bodilojs hand as in the un ites he not remember what and especially what in twenty years? Does that interval a public "d, has been organi- c i "C, intolerant of the "f man in chains ■ e thu embodied • Mie Whig party of 1 ■ Democrats of • ’<1 indeed who ’ 1 ' 'able time at th< gathering signs of ,c bodiless hand on be permitted witli- beseech the whole party warfare, and MACON, 30th Sent., 1814. Dear Sir,—We learn that you have re cently returned from a somewhat protracted vi sit to the North, and while there, met with some difficulty in reclaiming a fugitive slave L May we trespass upon your attention for a brief state-1 tbeir ^voca¥le ’ doom" The time is surely meat of the embarrassments under which you coming, when they cannot rcl v on either \Vhi»s labored, and a history of the personal peril i or Democrats nr the North, and when that day you encountered in the reclamation of your | conQ es, happy .wilHt ba for them, if they have properly. You will readily perceive that our the times” nor -‘see hi the wall.” And if I migh out arrogance, I would South to lay aside their squabble for office, and unite llietr best coun- sels, and their best energies to provide for their future safety bef.-re “the bodiless hand” writes object in addressing you this note, is to ascer tain, from a reliable source, the true position of the Whig and Democratib parties at the North, in regard to the great and absorbing question of Abolition . A Georgian by adoption, and identified as you are with the South, in all the interests of a permanent citizen, and so extensively known throughout our limi's, your statement cannot fail to carry with it a most salutary influence. Respectfully, yottr friends, SAMUEL B. HUNTER. WILLIAM SOLOMON. A. P. POWERS. H. K. GREEN. D. C. CAMPBELL. ROBERT COLLINS. Col. S. T. Bailey, Vincville. Vi.neville, 1st Oct. 1S-14. Gentlemen,—Your note reached me last sight, requiring u statement of the trials and perils which I encountered this summer at the North, and the position of the two great polit ical partiesthere, touching abolition. It would require too much time and space te detail half the striking incidents which' occurred in the affiiir to which you allude. Briefly—my ser vant was seduced away from my sick family during mv absence in Canada ; I liaving left them in Vermont. I ascertained on my return, in what part of the country sin was conceal ed; I went with a frtend ahd retook her, and conveyed her to Bal'imore. I was pursued through.Massachusetts. Rhode Island and Con necticut, by the Abolitionists, with the ener gy of blood hounds, bu' w«s saved by a cor- respo: duiir e ergy ml vigilance of a few faith ful friends. O.. my return to my family in Vermont, myself and friend were arrest* don a charge of kidnapping, punishable in that Stale, with ten years imprisonment in the Pen itentiary. T). m*>ns from Hell *-ouM not have manifested more ferocious malice than the gang Who ariested us, and Aet ti e majority of those who had aided and took a part in that prosecution, di: not prof* ss to be Aholi- i;oms's. After a tedious trial, we tvee dis- chitr^ed. and on the groan ; that it was nor pro ven ft'ifd my servant was furred away ugamsl her will, foVd therefore np kideapping. In ibis affair, the difference in no conduct of the yVhigs and De.’ifOc rats was most striking. The Domocrats gathered in from a dist r.ee. even from New Hampshire, although most of them strangers tome, and gave Utterance loud and ° * * _ .1 A. tnctnln From the Globe, of 4th inst. Maryland Election. The Telegraph has brought iu to-day the tlirce counties from which we had no returns last night, ns follows: St. Mary's, 272 majority for Pratt. Somerset, 304 “ “ “ Worcester, 440 “ “ “ fat them Irntn nth* ri.ONDEfl.” r -tale? to seek bread by VICES, have t service if not b; The New Yo.k Courier & Enquirer is an other whig press which has been equally open- mouthed on this su!')trct. It says:— •• Tlie naluralizaiir>*- ’ ,\v* mtm ne changed and tl.e time exvnded to TWENTY-ONE YEAlir 1 ,- : w- ~bnll be over-run w-.iht* LAWLESS IGNORANT FKOJtll- (jAVE.AND 1) R ’-'-n . ’ X SET OF FC . -V h - ' Just before the . . clion in New Yof which we have already once or twice sroken, custom, we wiil s!i< tun or fifteen dolla ‘ who is too penurious to spare for advertising. To Prevent Horses from bring Teased by Flies* or tltree small handfuls of Walnut leaves, upon two or (Bree quarts of cold wtuer, let it infuse nd p'-ur the whole t rvt morning, into a kettle, quarter m it it hi *.r : hen cold it is fit for use. • e with it and ! efore the horse goes out m t- . v'» t.-e most irritable be tine r- iqt ■!. i-veiv ■•niereifofman’' who u-i-s ig the hot race -ornote hi* comfort 1.016 These returns will give Pratt (Whig) 399 major ity in the Slate, if our returns, and our estimate for the Glades in Alleghany county, published in the Globe last night, were correct. Tiie Telegraph at Baltimore reports the Whig feel grateful for them From the Globe-. Henry to Cassius. Here is another epistle before the ink is dry on tlie paper in which leave was taken of that which we are assured was the last. But this, it seetns, has found its way into the news papers without the least agency of either Cassius or Henry Clay. The public will naturally inquire liow this occurred. It is thus stated m the Albany Atlas : Double Dkalixg.—The following letter, as we leant from the Evening Journal, from which we take it, was written by his kinsman, Cassius M. Clay, ami was sent, un der cover, to the Hon. Willis Green. Air. G. forwarded it from Washington, under cover, to Mr. B. Blum, of New York. Mr. Blunt delivered it to Mr. Greeley of the New York Tribune, for Mr. C. M. Clay, Mr. Greeley, it is said, lost the letter from his pocket, and it was found and publish ed in the New York Democrat. [COHFIDBKTIAL] "ASHLAND, Sept. 18, 1814. “Mr DEAR SIR—I receive.! your favor of the 10th inst., in which you state that you will be in Boston on the 19th, where it is impossible this letter can reach you; and I therefore send it to the Hon. Willis Green, to be forwarded to you. I atn perfectly persuaded of your friendly intentions, at>d provided means of self-reliance. I remain, gentlemen, Respectfully, vours, &c. __ * S. T. BAILEY. Messrs. Hunter, and others. infamous proceeding. Those hNtn IN. Ilntnp shire, swore that no Southern genflemnn c«uld be treated thus in their State, while tlie H bigs, with but few honorable exceptions stood cold- Messrs. Editors :— It Seems that no man can presume to think or act for himself, if he has ever !- kinged tc the Whig party of Georgia, without drawing upon himself, peraonnally, a pack who stand ever ready to bay for the party. ,1. have made their onset upon me in the I ; ‘MY. ti ger, simply because I cared to express my in dividual opinion when civilly asked, and sun dry certificates are given that my opinions are erroneous.—As to the truth or error of those opinions, the future will settle that matter. I might give a host of certificates substantiating the. truth of my statements : nay, I could give extracts from Whig papers at the North, ac knowledging that a majority of tha Abolition ists were from the Whig party. ;n**l that they were thereby in danger *»f defeat; and 1 say again, ite.mo honest man tliere ever denied it to me : but I disdain certificates. The people of the South may believe me or not. as they please;. I shall stand as good a clia cc as others, let what "ill come hereafter. 1 put it to ®very cand d Georgian to say, if this is not a singular state oftltings. Tlie peo- pie of the South atv reviled and denounced as Barbarians, rhieves, Robbers ai d Hypocrites by the wholesale at the North, their property constantly stolen from them, and their citizens imprisoned m the penitentiary if th* y attempt to regam it; and not emm.-nt with tlii.-i, t.ao whole Whig party of the North press upon the National Legislature Abolition petitions, denouncing to the world the citizens of the South as thieves, r fibers :n d hypocritts: and vet, if a citize of the South d res to speak against this imm tculati Wl ig party at the North,or simply give it as his opinion that they are enemies of the South, he must be denounc ed and reviled inst spirit and style of vulgarity that would make ever, the Abolitionists them selves biush ; and this, not by the great Whig leader, John Q. Adams, but by his allies in the South. Here lies all our dancei : the South could defy tbe hostility of the world united, if all hef citizens would be true to her; but such is the delusion of [tarty and the love of office, that in the hour-of peril she will be betrayed to the enemy for “thirty pieces of silver.” But it was unnecessary to certify that the Whig party at the North are not Abolitionists, for 1 never said they were.— IJut I now shy that tin v are Abolitionists as to the Territories. Tht-v befieve, or profess to'believe, that no new Slate ought to fie admitted with Slavery. Does deep to their abhorrence and detestation o! the Judge Holt intend to deny that the extract iitftmnin nrncMilinr. Those Iff* 1 ® N. Ilntnp- Irom Mr. Choate s speech is . not genuine or that, it is not the sentiments of the WLig par ty at the North ? yea or nay ? that speech is circulated at the North as one ol their Text ly aloof or directly aided in the prosecution— ! Books, and can be easily obtained, one of my relatives, a member of the Pres-j .1 now will, however, take up seriatim their byterian church, informed me that whenever several attacks, and dispose of them as they he attempted to vindicate me to the members ] msril, and 1 hope to do it in a better temper of his church, they would utter one united j than has actuated those^vho have so wantonly voice of condemnation, and yet he as well as assailed rue. First, in order, come the Editors they were Whigs. Indeed I found throughout of the Messenger, and the Hon, Judge Strong, the New England and Middle States, a deep ! ce.tainly 1 cat '* <> objt ct:on to the cdilo- rooted hatred of slaveholders amongst the great rial comments ding the t xtruct of a letter mass of the Whig party. 1 travelled through all those States and watched with an anxious desire to learn the truth, I travelled incog, as far as practicable, that they might not know I was a Southerner, and thus give them free But I must say for mo by the et! But you can have no conception, Take tv which one night ; and hoil 1 naiority in the Stele at 550, including an estimate unless vou had been here, of tbe injury which your letter ru | e s ofpolitcness itr the Glades. We .to not know how much they 10 '!’ e "?* dotng; and that was nothing in com- -yj] question nruiB u.aurs. , . . parison to that which it ws» likely to inSut upon the W big a “ fstimate there for the (ritides ;^the estimate ol the cau ., e in tl „. Sti)le , of Tennessee, North Carolina, and j de“'-e to be drawn ' ~ Our Iriend John Speed 8tnilh as well as others, j( -p 0 fiti CS , all I ask, is tO be permitted, as even endangered tlie State ol Kenttteky. This. , _r.,.t;j i : u. li.. Whins here for them is 90. for ibein last night, we did are on tbe Pennsylvania —or rather the great When we Pstimat lot recollect that they ine. Our gieatest losses Georg thought it _ effect resulted from your undertaking to speak of ..... . . . vate feelinga and those of my near and particular iriet;-**, | \\ mg gains—-are in tlie an( ; y Qur ,tateinent that you had been ten vears oper»«.in scope to speak their minds without infrin the rules of politeness, and I came to a settled conviction in my own mind, that a majority of the Democratic party at the North, er= the warm friends of the South, and that a majori ty of the Whigs there are out enemies—that a large majority of the Abolitionists are from the Whig ranks, no honest men at the North pretends to deny. But that there are many Abolitionists front the Democratic ranks, and many good friends among the Whigs is just as certain. This state of things is easily accounted for; the Democratic parly at the North, is with few exceptions, the same that sustained the country during the last war while neatly all the leaders of the Whigs in New England are tlie old Federalists of the worst school. The Democrats retain all their ancient hatred of British arrogance and aggression, and tliere- tore, when lite British slanJ®*" *^ ie Southern people or aggress upon tMr rights, they feel it an insult to thenteel’-os nS Americans, while the Federalists side with Engi ind and join in her slanders of th" Southern people. I trust *r e „i/einen, I have sufficiently an swered you' questions. It is with reluctance that 1 have answered you—nothing but the ness has drawn forth this answer demands a reply. 1 do not into the disturbing current by tlu* count)?? y.hicjj ioin feunsvlvaniq. from ; in the Abolition cans**. I • heretofore, to glide along in an humble station, while others worry each other like dogs, on the mlitical arena, and while I shall neither furnished by Jutli that the respe ere avowee itors is rather equiv< *v n in connect with the scurr'il us pi'-co a gam. • me, ittsei cd by them iu a sufist que-nt part of their |j.*, • - * Now, as to the extract of a letter—certainly that letter is mine. It is to be regretted that party malice is sometimes suffered to interrupt the harmony of the most sacred relations of life, ami urge men to act in a manntv that their cooler judgment would conde Bi: '. On Monday iast, Judge Strong came P m .y house, and in u peremptory tone, demf^F-d il I had a piece coming out in the Tcl<y. i : M’hi 1 replied 1 had ; he replied, well, sir. 1 shall publish your first letter to me, if it *3 against the W bigs, I replied in fubstaueft l hat 1 had nolhmg so con ceal, and that In* was welcome to publish till mv letters tb*i 1 should act in that matter, anti in"all mayors for myself, that if lie chose, lie could s' triiico better evidence of my attacn- me „ ( and fidelity to the Whig party in times p-,st, than that letter, but that ho well knew that 1 had changed my mind as to the policy and principles of rhe’tw o parties—there the mat ter ended. Subsequently the note calling forth my reply iu the Telegraph, Extra, reached me, and now we have the Judge’s threat veri- fied—now, since 1 am to be victimized as tar as party rancor can drag me up from an humble private station to the altar, I shall struggle a little to defend myself, and may hope r,.y ene mies will find there are blows to take as well as blows to give ; certainly it is a wnY-. disgusting tome, but when ut fend myself. Why is that 1 lit” ' gainst me? Only to induce a '■ diet / have since stated is untrue— - me public would hardly expect that when Judge 8trc"g furnished that letter for the press, be bad iu his