Georgia telegraph. (Macon, Ga.) 1844-1858, August 18, 1857, Image 2

Below is the OCR text representation for this newspapers page.

jgy e i dmtmn THE GEORGIA TELEGRAPH. COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS. Cl ancll UinnibM. / Macon, < • • ■ Aogoat I3tli. V REGULAR Mi l-.llHU. "Present—A. U. Adiints. UIvor, AM. KimmUk Ulumn, J.■;.i.':• • i 1 , > ti ■ • absent—AM. Winshlp, Ftaadan. The minutes of the last meeting were read, and '^heBrtdge Keeper reported tolls for the week to cUi,-. $180,90. ., ... , . i'ne Clerk of Msrket reported fi s for the jreek to ^*lhG^ Guard Hoose Keeper reported fees for the to dnU'i $7,50. The Finance Committee reported in favor or A. B. Rosa’ account, 4 l 50. On motion Aid, IVAtick, Resolved. That in aecordnnce with the recommon- Hat ion of the board of Health* that his honor the Mayor direct the marshals to examine the different cellars in the City, and report promply all that have standing water in them ; and that the marshal urge it upou parties, where such nuisance exists, to abate the same without delay. Passed. On motion Aid. Ellis, Resolved, 'Hint the Agent of the estate of Thos. Gibson be notllied to remove the stagnant water on the vacaut lot near the Medical College, by tilling it up. or otherwise, within five ilays, and on failure that the city have it done at bis expunse. Passed. ^ The committee on City Hall lieg leave to report, Vthat they have contracted for the purebaso nud do livery of the brick for the building, as shown by the following contracts with H. M. Hailey und Collins A Hardy ROBERT FINDLAY, Ch'mn. GEORGIA, Rmn Coo.ntt.-~Tho City Council of Macou liaa this day eutered into contract with Col lins and Hard), for furnishing and delivering six hundred thousand (600,000) brick, at the corner of Poplar and Second streets, for the purpose of build ing a new City Hall. 8aid brick to be a fair mer chantable article; i. e., two thirds bard burnt brick, one third salmon do., and delivered in quantities as follows : one hundred thousand, (100,000( by tho 15th day of Oct. next; one hundred thousand (100,000) t>y tho 1st day of Nov. next. The remaining four hun dred thousand, (400,000) to be delivered iu quantities of about one hundred thousand, (lOO.OOO) per month, between 1st of June and lat of October, for which the City Connell agrees to pay seven, (7) dollars per thousand, in 7 per et. City Bonds, as made and provi ded for on FebiiinrySth, 1 856, as per Ordinance pass edat that date. The payments to be made as each one hundred thousand, (UO.uuO) brick are delivered, out of tho five hundred dollars (#500) bonds falling due in November, 1866, and two (2) one hundred dol lar bonds, tailing due in November, 1«S4. (For the faithful performance of Ibe foregoing contract. Each party binds itself unto the other in the sum ot one thousand dollars) as stipulated damage* and notes n penalty, in case cither party fails or ret uses to comply with theforegoing contract.^ & ROBERT FINDLAY, - ) - A. B. ADAMS, ) THUS. B. ELKE, 5- A. G. BOSTICK, F. S. BLOOM. City or Macox, August 13, 1857. Similar Contract made with H. M. Railey. Alu. Bostick moved the ratification of the con tract. Which was carried by the following vote : Yeas—Findlay, Bostick. Bloom amiElfe—4. Nays—Johnston and Ellis—2. Ou Motion Aid. Blootn, Resolved, That the subject of the crossing of tho Railroad on Mulberry Street be referred to the Street Committee. Micheal Lawler's Petition to indemnify him for the loss sustained by the recent raio3, received and re ferred to tbe Street Committee. Council then adtournca R. CURD, C. C. Itrigmiiu Voting—Him Auleccdeuts. AGON, GA., Tuesday IiTorning. Aug. 18, 1857. Democratic Nominations. FOR GOVERNOR, JOSEPH E. BROVX. FOR CONGRESS, 1st Ditlr, icf—JAMES L. SEWARD. 2 <1 “ MARTIN J. CRAWFORD. 3d DAVID J. BAILEY. 4th “ L. J. GARTRELL. 5fA “ A. R. WRIC.nT. 6th “ JAMES JACKSON. 7 th LINTON STEPHENS. 8th “ A. H. STEPHENS. jf The Buffalo Commercial Advertiser furnishes the following nee,mnt of the life of Brigham Young while a residei.tnf New York. It says: Roth Brigham Young and Jlcber C. Kimball are New Yorkers. Brigham lived near the line dividing Ontario and Monroe counties, in the town of Victor, at tbe time he became a Mormon. He always manifested a proclivity to religious fanaticism^ or rather lie was a lazy rapscallion, good for nothing except to howl at a camp-meeting, llo lived in n log shanty, with a dilapidated, patient, sufli-rii.g wife, surrounded by a host of tow-beaded chihtren.— Occasionally he made up a lot of axe helves and trad ed them off tor sugar and tea. In other (its of indus try, he would do a day's work in the hay field for n neighbor, boe the potatoes in his own little patch, or pound clothes for his wife, on a wasliing-dny. rcBnt his special mission was to go to «v nip ine-t- iugs and revivals where he managed to get his dai v, bread out of tbe mure wo.Jtliy biethron. in considi r- alien of the unction with which he shouted "ga-lo- rab!” On uch occasions Brigham took no thongbt on tbe morrow, but cheerfully puttiug on bis wool hat, without a morsel ot flour iu the barrel, or wood at the door, and tulliog l.is wife that “the Lord would provide," he would put out for a week's absence. Poor Mrs. Brigham managed along by burrowing from her neighbors, with small hopes of r. paying— chopped the wood herself, ami with an old suu bou rn t. Navarino style, went to the spring after water —thoroughly couvinccd that her lot was none of the easiest, aud that her husband was, to use n western expression, an "or'nary cuss," iu which sentiment all who knew him Joined. People were getliug tired of Brigham, whoR Mor- nionisin turned up. He was just the man for the re ligion, aud tbe religion was jus("hd»pted for him. He became an exhorter, and held neighborhood meetings—ranted and bowled his doctrines iuto the miuds as weak as himself, and finally went west with the rest of them. There be has developed, until the miserable rustic loafer is Governor of a Territory, and chief prophet of an important religions sect.— He has just the mixture of shrowdness and folly that is requisite for success in fanaticism or quackery.— A wiser man cuuld not hold his place. A man must be half fool aud half knave, to be a successful quack. To Correspondents. We are forced to omit several favors this week. They corno upon us thick and heavy, and as the Telegraph Is necessarily very much occupied with advertisements, we would suggest the importance of great brevity in communications. Strike direct ly at ymirlde;, in the very first line, without preimi- to;*.' u. lutiouuetory remarks. Judge Brown. Tlic Democratic nominee for Governor ar rived from Savannah and adjacent counties, and will address his fellow-citizens of Bibb, on this Monday night, (17th inst.,) at Concert Hall. The Judge is in fine health and brings tho most cheering reports. Ho is a gentleman of tine, frank and cordial address, with a countenance beaming with intelligence and bearing tho impress of character and ability* lie will make friends wherever he goes, be yond the limits of his own party. The “Goodwood Cnp.” Halifax, Ang. J2. The result of tho “ Goodwood Cup” races, in which tho American horses. Prior and Pri oress, were beaten, 1ms already been tele graphed. Tho French horse Monarque won the race. The English boric, Riseber, was second, and Fisherman third. Prior was fifth and Prior ess sixth. SoutIi*weatern Rail Road. I Saratoga Springe, Wo have seen proof sheets of the 10th An- August 14th, 185' nual Report of operations on this Read for the Dear Telegraph The weather is extreme rear ending 31st July, aud below append tho ]y warm—yes—awful. "Hot, hotter, hottest Treasurer’s Abstract of earnings as compared hottentotissimus, hot as an oven, hot as tw with those of the previous year, showing a net [ omi3i hot Qg seven ovcnSi » hot as the “Spay increase of $12,121.46. notwithstanding a net ten ^yffil.” We have panted and foamed decrease in Cotton freight, owing to the short an j t r ; e( j t0 keep cool with but little success crop and increased river transportation of j Last night wc rejoiced itl a finc shower, rather last year, amounting to 10.,35 bales. Yi c too muc h lightning and thunder, but the rain append, also, a table showing the number of was , very wclc0lne . since I have become the passengers transported on the road-an average digI)ified ,. Professor „ of tbe horse rakibus, of 240 per day, against 194 last year. 1 ,1C have not found a spare moment to write you pnssenger business on this road is wonderful. however, you find my penmanship dccidely When the enterprise was projected the engi- gjjgky, and if tny sentences don’t “ascertain” ncer’s estimate of this item was an average of a3 Kingman” would say, please give the twenty passengers a day! manuscript to the Devil (of your office—icheUitr The Road has now in operation on the main black or and hc wiU it c i ear as line towards Albany ninety five miles,—from mud- Fort Valley to Butler twenty-two miles-117 in | But , Jny dcar Tc i cgrap h, "The top of the all. The extensions towards Eufaula and Fort Gaines are in rapid progress. Southward, the Road will reach Albany about 1st of Oc tober next. ,»_ The South-western Company is ono of the morning to you, be Jabcrs.” Just call by and wc will repair to tbfi meadow; and if you are not skilled in tbe scientific use of that ‘ag ricultural implement,’ the scythe, I will ‘cut your corns’ for you. The very heavens arc Snpcrior Court—-Hlacon Circuit. We learn that Judge Powers, in consider ation of special reasons, has been induced to recall his letter of resignation, and will con tinue for a time the discharge of Judicial func tions in this Circuit. The Knoxville Commercial Con- VEXTION. This body met on the 10th and adjourned on the 14th, to meet in Montgomery, Alaba ma, next May. Over one thousand delegates were in attendance, and Mr. J. B. DcBow of most prosperous and prudently managed cor- fragrant with tb(J smel , of ha y. Ag wo pass porntions in tbc wide world, and t crearc ew in down lbe j anCj j e {. ug s t 0 p a t itbc spring,’ and the country which have before t lcm sue 1 a cei 0 f ^ cr y S fc a | t health-giving waters that tainandbrilliant future. Its business is bound to bubbleforthat our feet . grow rapidly with the devc opment o t e er limpid and pure is this mountain dew, tile region through whic it posses, ant as 1 pro jis^iUed fresh from yonder rocky height. Here grcsscs South and V est, it 18 6*J 'enngcieiv J Qnder tbc coo jj n g B h a (l e of these thrifty crau month new acquisitions and " n na } c ic I bcrl y bushes, is my Sanctum. Take that great outlet of ono of the best an ar a es o I roc j C( jj a j or —Kot quite as soft as the splendid ton growing regions in the United States. | otto mans at the‘Lanier House,’but good e- nough for a King—so be seated. Don’t be ce remonious. Not as easy as the Editor’s chair ? My dear Sir, ‘Mine Host, Col. Logan,’ can’t boast of a better one. Elongate the 16wer ex tremities of your corpus, recline your caput against the jutting bank,'and for once shout Eureka. * Yes, you have found it for the first time since you ‘followed in the footsteps of your illustrious predecessor, Phil Tracy.’ With nothing but the sparkling beverage, we will regale and ‘sing tbe days of Auld Lang But, dear Telegraph, the 3 o’clock E. c “ sTSe o e | - *&«.§§fait p c —t cr r From the Richmond (Va ) Examiner. The Northern Democracy—By their FRUITS YE SHALL KNOW THEM. *At a time when so many infatuated hot- blpods of tbo ultra South arc conspiring to rend tho National Democratic party in twain, atid to erect ou its ruins a sectional organiz ation, whoso only know n principle of warfare shall be indiscriminate hostility to every tiling Northern—at a time when discord reigns su preme, and the dissolution of the great nation- al.party of the Union seems ; ^mminent and inevitable—at a time when < iftP.iost trusted and prominent men are taking counsel of fac tion and discontent, and fanning flames which, from their age and position, the country ex pected that they would help to subdue; it may not be improper to remind the South of what that Northern Democracy which they are making so much haste to repudiate, have done in-co-operation with the South on memorable occasions in tho past: *•When Florida was an applicant for admis sion into tho Union os a sovereign State in 1&J5, with slavery, the vote on her admission stood thus: In tho House, Northern Dtmo- etali. yeas 58, nays 4. All tbe members of all other parties of the Xqyth, numbering 37, voted in the negativo. In tho Senate all the IVorthern Democrats numbering 13, voted in tho affirmative, while all the Northern Men be longing to other parties, numbering 9, voted against it. But for the votes of these North ern Democrats, Florida would not have been admitted into tho Union ft a State. •• Take now tho question ft the annexation of Texas. Who in the North voted for it? who against it ? In tho House of Representa tives 87 northern Democrats voted for it. and only 3 against it; while not a tingle man from the North of any other party voted for it. All others, numbering 4t>, voted against it. But for Northern Democratic votes Texas would nof have been annexed. *• Now, let us take tbo fugitive slave law. On the adoption of this law the vote stood thus —northern Democrats, yeas 28, nays 14 ; all others from the North yeas 3, nays 63. But three Northern voters outside of tho Demo cratic party. Thus it is clear that tho fugi tive slave law would never have been passed without tho aid of Northern Democrats. "Let us now consider tho Nebraska hill— that most trying and tcrifie of all measures to tho Northern Democracy—that measures un der which courage qualified and viftuo was seduced—that measure which, in the North, made npostacy a virtue and fidelity a crime— which made an Abolitionist an angel and a Democrat a devil—an erdeal the most fearfuf of all to which the Northern Democracy have ever been subjected. Ou this question how did the vote stand ? The northern Democrats who voted for it iu the House were 45 ; those who voted against it were 38. not one North ern man of uny other party voted for it.— They all voted against it to the number of 54. In tlic Senate the Northern Democrats who voted for it were 14, against it, i Xo North ern Whig or (of course) Abolitionist voted for it.” presided. We find the following synopsis its proceedings: Tho Business Committee of the Comt$ft Convention have reported against free-trade and direct taxation; ngainst the South’s re ceiving goods coming from States that refuse to uphold the Fugitive Slave law, and against discrimination by the government in favor of foreign mail lines from Northern ports. They have reported in favor of the exemp tion of one slave to eneh slave-holder from seizure aud sale for debt; in favor of erecting Arizonia into a Territory; in favor of recover ing certain land lost by the recent treaty with Mexico. They also reported that the time has not yet nrrived for tho Convention to eonsid cr the subject of rc-opening the African Slav irade. A resolution has been ifdopted re commending the withdrawal of our squadron from the African coast—also n resolution naming Montgomery, Alabama, as the place for tho next meeting of the Convention. Worse mid Worse. MR. REX. HILL AT ATHENS. Tho Banner’s comments upon .Mr. Uill speech and his discussion with Judge Brown at Athens, disclose npon the part of the champi on of Know Nothiugism, n degree of reckless ness in statement, without a parallel. The fact is, Mr. Hill’s case is so desperate, that he knows it can't be damaged by temerity. Ac cording to the Banner, Mr. Hill asserted that Hr. Walker and the President had actually proposed to the people of Kansas to organise a non-slave-holding State! He asserted that the resolution in the Knnsas.democratic Con vention, expressing confidence in Walker passed only by a majority of one—41 voting for and 40 against it! He announced that the President read and approved Walker’s iuaugu- ral before it was delivered—and that Mr. Bu Buchanan had since declared that Walker has ac(jd "with wisdom and justice,” and that he "justifies, sustains and upholds him J” He dc nied that hc had said last year Kansas could never be a slave state, but only it could nev cr be a slave State under the Kansas bill Whnt then, Mr. Hill, has become of those ral- uable principles in the Kansas bill, opposition to which, is enmity to the South and the Con stitution ? But. he cannot damage his cause in Georgia. That is beyond bis power to do. It is as safe from mortal barm as anything past vital breath can be. Judge Brown treat ed him to a thorough exposure and won golden opinions from all present. Tennessee anti Kcntacky. The following arc lists of members elect in these States: 1 Dial. A O Watkins, D 2 •• W W Wallace, D. 3 “ Samuel A Smith, 1). 4 “ Jao H Savage, D. 5 " Chae. Heady, A. 6 “ Geo W. Julies, D. 7 •• Jao V Wright, D. 8 " .Ino Zollicoffer. A. 9 “ J D C Atkins, D. 10 “ W T Avery. D. 1 Dist. H C Barnett, D. 2 •• S O Peyton, D. 3 “ W L Underwood, A. 4 •• A G Talbot, D. 5 “ J II Jewett, D. (i J M Elliott, D. H Marshall, A. J B Clay, D. JnoC Masrn, A. j 10 “ Jno W Stevenson D 8 Eight Democrats and two Know Nothings in Tennessee, and seven and thVec in Ken tucky—a democratic gain in both of seven! The popular democratic majority in each State was not far from 13.000.' The Dev.-s ok Palestine.—“In tho Scriptures, frequent allusion is made to the dews l:i l.iiesUne. Daring the months of J une, .1 uly and August, the atmosphere is mild and serene; s cloud is seldom seen, and e'e.dy a drop of mill (le-eeiuls; but, to supply in some measure this deficiency, the earth w moistoued by nocturnal dews, wliieii are so eopiousa> to resemble small, thick, penetrating rain, and a person ex posed to them would soon be wet to his skin. . The next House of Represunta TIVES. All elections have been made to the next House, with tbe exception of members from Maryland, Georgia, Mississippi and Louisiana, and two vacant districts—one in Pennsylva nia and one in Indiana. The members elect are classified by tbe Washington Uniou as fol lows : Democrats 110: Black Republicans 91; Southern Knownotliings 8. If the four States where elections are yet to be held return as before, the House will then stand Democrats J25; Black Republicans 91 ; Knownotliings 16. The Union, however, anticipates a gain of 2 in the vacnntdistricts, which will secure to the Democrats 18 clear majority, without count ing upon gains in the remaining States. The country, therefore, may be safely congratula ted upon the fact that all chance of manoeuver- ing a Black Republican into tho Speaker’s Chair again, is precluded in the next Congress. CiiuEigu iii the order of Ibiltlc. The J lines & Sentinel says a plan is whis pered about tho'streets to takedown "Our Beu” as an unpromising inve-tmeut, and to run in his stead an “ independent democrat,” with a view to dividing the Demociwlic party. The plan is a good one and let them take Messrs. Gaildenor Simmons, and organize at once a " Discontented Party.” p JZ p to ao *4 *a a *o"to - r~ C O Li CS U O C n* IP « Sr 35 o *o*ei u u'T ao « « * ?*© 19 U A Cl T •»> CO ®_©J—_■» *V*»t9*o o »se*ggg i "to « 00 gi s M 06 OP ta O. wo_sr »S to to MW* UUM Vj a ®o'ob -J m m’ - c c g y “ * *J » m c O.O-JO to CO iJ O <0 CM « - | y*uVo«a-ijbe* a I ww wm a o ci o * y «- UJS tO JO tO tO tO to to »5. M to b m y V m Vj b b b b b a ®^*u40-i-yaB«o 0®na«it9 0i9 0«i-*u 8hg|¥«h-VVlj-6 > C Cr Ci Cts QD C* ; cm*-m i:jo y uuuu to m» ®*«»®b c ubb *b wc. A j— )0 QUUQD Mocobci wbb«M*M OOl9*lfO«4l9 t a;Ht> cicac. Ohoo cb ti* T: ooftcoyaam _CJ j;T5 ^^XODOD W CJ -- o c* M b> c* ”o Is — o 1-» bi bi iv®a»m®yoc» o cr o w to JO I9UUU cr •- mm^ ^ u ®b c eb e a V* * » » -jo a to <x>~t ao ® ccbb® b* #9 b **i c o wwmaSbiy u « COQCOCCISCOOU *r»acie.cj-ooccc y m c j- at p act cj p MtrlrVibbcCK cr cc Z. « - C » U O CJJatJJvCJN- C VCMtSUM - 5 - M^J V? is " w k u M c b b M rrP^^^esoooMy o rT £■ S? J? 2 2 M M 19 »9 { JUUuU- * ® J - 5* ^9 * - O ebb ® g M C c C L’ 15 Ri a K 91 .® « mm (,r ® M 6. y Ii #* *• o | b ® 1 ub*-%b wV) u *i c.. * I w* r.® tpmuvw - o_ — CJM "re 50 pBi Ys « o u u » i s?n **. e ft -V g S' SL S* =• 'A >■ 'A 33 £< 0^0 g- >- F c--« O' 2 © . o c •< 5^ 2.3 ? • • • r yd p 2. ; : : • f p .3. M 19 c - o Cfl Ci y x o — -4 -i» ic a—» oe C9 cr O 35 ® c M 4. ‘I OC tz «U IC — m C* J. C- ir 91 c m 19 t- t9 It 19 ti to C7 Ct p 19 im C9 OS K, M M MWtor M to to Sk IC mm ro 0 to CC — tc SO Ct ic co ic ao —r —r 10 OD - m 00 O » 19 • CO mm to > O ©r » ■ 5 ** c % I Syne. &5 train of yesterday, from Rutland, has chang ed the date of this letter from Castleton, to Sa ratoga Springs. Almost before I could say ‘Jack Robinson,’ old ‘Bird’s eye’ faded from our view, and ‘Presto,’ here we are in the love ly village of Saratoga. The ‘United States’ looks inviting as ever. The annual throng of visitors are swarming through well furnished j I parlors and beautiful pleasure grounds, while ky I excellent 'Bands discourse enchanting strains § j of‘fairy like music.’ There is a sound of reve- ly here, and bright the lamps shine o’er fair women, and brave men; a thousand hearts beat happily; aud when music rises with voluptuous swell, soft eyes look love to eyes that speak again, and all goes merry as the I marriage bell.’ The beauty and chivalry ‘Congress Hall’ presents the same gay ap pearance and activity as in days of yore. But what shall I say of ‘Congress Springs’—that glorious old fountain, sparkling—babbling— gushing forth the delicious nectar ? Not ma ny generations ago, the red man drank of these waters, and looking up to the Heavens pray ed the ‘Great Spirit’ that they might ever a balm of Gilead to the tribe. Alas! the fates had decreed otherwise; and the tawny war riors have passed away before the onward march of their pale faced brothers. ‘Sic vol vere pareas.’ Old Congress went on a ‘bust’ a few diwssincc, utterly refusin'? to sparkle fnrtt iU •Matchless Sanative’ for almost every disease that affects the human race. But Clarke and 551 White succeeded in recapturing this fugitive son of Neptune, and effervescing draughts now await its many anxious devotees. CONGRESS SPRING WATER As analysed by Dr. John H. Steel at the Spring. Chloride of Sodium ..grains, 385,000 Hydriodate of Soda Bi Carbonate of Soda Bi Carbonate of Magnesia Carbonate of Lime Carbonate of Iron Silex and Alumina Hydro Bromate ofPotash a trace.... 3.500 8,982 95,789 98,099 5,075 1.500 — ta CT ^ Solid contents in a gallon 597,943 CarbonicliUid gas 311 Atmospheric Air 7 Gaseous contents in a gallon......318 cubic inches. Analysis made in London by Sir Humph rey Davy and Prof. Faraday, from Congress Water bottled seven months: Chloride of Sodium 385,44 grains. Hydriodate of Soda 4 02 Carbonate ot Lime 116,00 Carbonate of Magnesia.... 56,80 Oxide of Iron 64 Carbonate of Soda - 56 Hydro Bromate ofPotash a trace.... 00 Solid contents in a gallon 563,46 Dr. N. Bedortha’s elebrated water cure es tablishment affords a fine opportunity for any wishing to receive Hydropathic treatment His institute is full of boarders and patients from all parts of the country. We don’t get such a variety of the flesh pots of Egypt as the ‘Bon vivants’ at the Union Hall; neither do we imbibe ‘Bonum vinum* like unto a fol A National Party. The JVationa/ Know-nothing Party now numbers one Senator in Congress, one Governor and some dozen or so Representatives. “Americans” they say I lower of Bachus, but ptain uatural fare, such must rule America,” but as these arc the only A- I as will satisfy a good Democrat and Christian. merieant in office duly sworn and qualified, as such Two regular bred physicians, and about thirty it must be confessed the chances look slim. They assistants are uuder his supervision. It is a havtyliminished during tho last two years by death great resort for invalids believing that water defiSjanddefection to Black Republicanism morc « 8 the cnre-a l, no matter what the disease; and ♦h«n i iftAnanoanr __ 1 * 4 » . * r , they generally depart swearing by the consti- than ISOOpcrcent., and, at that rate of progress who tutfonand Latin Vulgate, ‘the like was never will fix the day when Knownothing Americans must kaown .> Yours, &c. MACK, rule America? The motto, however, says they ll must Second District. Hon. Wm. H. Crawford, in response to a letter notifying him of his nomination to Con gress as tbc Knownothing candidate of the 2d District, declines, on tbc ground that he is phy sically too feeble to # endure tho labors of the canvass. An Indefensible Post. Under the rules of War the attempt to maintain .do it, and if they don’t set about it soon, absolute I monarchy will follow; for it is a plain case that go* I ing on this way they will soon get reduced to ono man. Like cousin Sally he ought to “gin a treat” before hc commences tbc arduous undertaking, of ruling America.” Suicide of Gen. Rusk. We see nothing more explanatory of this singu lar and deplorable event, than the following from th^Phcogdoches Chronicle of tho 80th ult.: L t W , . ,, . .... .. I an indefensible post involving tho useless effusion of Gen. Rusk has, ever since the death of his wife, I , ■ ... suffered under a mental depression which at times Wood is death to tbs commander. 5\ hat shall be done bore him down beneath its weight. Ho has to a Knownothing leaders, who arc keeping up this farce great extent, secluded himself from society, and of a fight in Georgia? Messrs. Ben Hill and Ransc lately that despondency has been more marked and Wright arc clever gentlemen and must not be apparent to those familiar with him. A severe ill- shot; but it is a pity to waste so much time and from a rising back of his neck. ' cnterta,Ils for »moment, home of the papers a - Oa yesterday evening, about 2 o’clock, his f«n-1 broad are speaking of the osaWvt in Georgia. They ily hearing the report of a gun and the fall of a do not understand the case. It is only a Kansas. body, ran to the spot, and found him lying dead More Black «pnnbiiciniisin. upon the ground, behind the gallery at the hack of , 15,1 , Republicanism, tho house, with a rifle under him. A coroner’s ju- I The 1 clcgrapl, under date of the loth inst. ry was summoned, from whoso verdict wc extract from New York, says that Ellen, a slave, be 1 i» ,. , ,, , . , .. . I longing to Miss Louisa Kerr, of Savannah, was “The cause of his death was a gun-shot (rifle) b & , wound on the fore part of his head, inflicted from declared free yesterday iu Westchester Coun a rifle gun held in his own hands and discharged ty, by Judge Robertson. by himself.” No further clue can be given to this mystery. I Judge Brown and the Admlnisira- Xo papers or writings of the same day have been TIOX W o Y l - r niJdrCsS , cd . 10 a f 1 «Icma.. In Th<J foUowin „ occordin g t0 thc Athens Banner, -\ew Orleans, ordering a tombstone tor his wife, . \ , . T , ,u„, with this inscription: was thc position taken by Judge Brown in that Blessedarethepurein heart, for they shallsee God.” place: He said that if Mr. Buchanan did not carry out From California. the doctrine of non-intervention he would oppose The Empire City brings news of thc nomi- him; if the charges against Walker were true, and n.tln,, iL 117 ii Mr. Buchanan refuses to recall linn he would con- nation of John B. Weller, as Democratic can- demn his administration to that extent; he was not didate for Governor of California, and Edward prepared to cut loose from the administration and anley, late member of the House from North thc national democratic party for this act. In oth- n ... . , er words, Ins election would not be considered a uolma, as the Black Republican candidate! condemnation of the administration as a whole, but lie Empire City brought a million and a half only of thc refusal to recall Walker. This was what of gold, and news of a destructive fire in Val- he “ tated anJ Ben Hill could not understand It-and , , . , . - , . . ranted until he made himself disgustingly ridieul- paraiso, and a desperate revolutionary fight in 0llg bec&uiS he pretended that the Judge would not l’eru, in which both parties claimed a triumph, j answer! Letter from Howell Cobb o£Kou TON. - Pcr.riT, August 14,1 Mr. Clisuy—Having been honored by my politi cal associates of this (Houston) county, with 11. seat in the recent Democratic Gubernatorial Convention and believing that the action of tho Convention, some particulars, 13 either misunderstood, or aVs ally misrepresented, I very respectfully request the privilege of presenting my views of the notion the Convention, through tho medium of the Georgia Telegraph. A correct understanding of that portion of tho ac tion of the Convention to which I refer, requiresthat it should be constantly and carefully remembered —the Convention supposed that a cardinal Democratic principle had been violated.- I do not hesitate to say, that the Convention acted upon that supposition perhaps I had better say, information. In the disens sion of this matter, two questions arise : first, whnt principle of the Democratic party was violated Secondly, by whom was that principle violated I I propose a candid examination of these two qnes tions; if after that, any are disposed still to ques tion the propriety of the action ot the Convention, as one of its members, shall add nothing more, eith erin tbe form of explanation or justification. Permit me to state here, two preliminary consid erations. In speaking of the Democratic party, this connection, I mean the Democratic party of the Union; not a portion ot the Democratic party, as may be found in this or that section of tbe Union— I mean tho Democrat of New Hampshire as well as the Democrat of Georgia. Tho principles of the party are as aacrcd to the ono as tho other—tho one should be as ready to defend tho principles of his party from violation, as the other. The other remark is this, the p. incip'.e of the Democratic party, involv ed in this discussion, is that of kon-intjcrvention that is, that tho people of a Territory, forming a Con stitution for the purpose of being admitted as State into the Union, have the right to proceed in their area vryy, to adopt such institutions as they may think proper, and to reject such as they please, without being interfered with, directed or influenced, by any one whatever. A proper understanding. of this principle, or doctrine, as it is more familiarly 'called, is derived from tho aet of Congress, passed for the organization of tbe Territories of Nebraska and Kansas: tbe full meaning of that act is summed up by Gov, Walker in bis inaugural address, thus— The mode of adjustment,’’ (of the slavory : ques tion,) “is provided in the act organizing your Ter ritory—namely, by thc people of Kansas ; who by a majority of their own votes, must decide this question for themselves, iu forming their State Constitution.’ Governor Walker, in urging this principle upon the people of Kansas, says, " I cannot too earnestly im press upou you tbe necessity of removing tho slave ry agitation from the halls of Congress and Presi dential conflicts. It is conceded that Congress has no power to interfere with slavery, in the States where it exists; and if it can now be established, as is clearly the doctrine of the Constitution, that Con gress has no authority to interfere with the peoplo of Territory on this subject, in forming a Stato Con stitution. the question must be removed from Con gressional and Presidential elections." He becomes exceedingly expjicit with regard to tbe principle in question and says, “ This is the principle affirmed by Congress in tho act organizing this Territory : ratified by tbe people j)f the United States, in the recent election, and maintained by tbe late decision of "the Supreme Coort of the United States. #If this principle can be carried iuto successful operation in Kansas—that her people shall determine what shall be her serial institutions—the slavery question must be withdrawn trom the halls of Congress and from our Presidential conflicts, and the safety of the Union be placed beyond all peril; whereas, if the principle should be defeated here, the slavery agitation mast be renewed in all elections throughout tho country, with increasing bitterness, until it shall eventually overthrow tho government.” It is shown by these quotations, that Governor Walker fully understood the principle, of non-intervention, and urged its ob servance upon tbo people of Kansas. Having made these preliminary statements, I shall now proceed to the direct examination of the questions involved. During the session of Congress of 1818-19, Mis souri mado application foradmission into the Union, ns a State; the bill formed for her admission, con tained a provision forbidding slavery; this bill pass ed the House of Representatives but was rejected by the Senate; consequently the uni f*u.d »t that session. During the session of 1819-20, the applica tion was renewed; upon,this, there arose in Con gress the most animated and stirring debates, for and against slavery, which passed from the halls of Con gress to tbe people, who attached themselves to one or the other side of tho question, as they favored or opposed the institution. As a means of quieting the agitation, which hud assumed a very grave aspect, and admitting Missouri into the Union, the measure known as the Missouri compromise, (a mere expedi ent,) was brought forward, by which slavery was recognized in Missouri, but forbidden in all that part of tho Territory of Louisiana, lying North of 36 degs. 30 mius. north latitude. The Constitution of Missouri was received during the session of 1820-21 and npon the issuing of the President’s proclamation in 1821, MUaouri took her place in the Union as Slave State. Tho restriction of slavery here men tinned, was acquiesced in by the SouJJi; not, howev ever, without tho dissatisfaction of many of her ablest statesmen, among whom, and at tbe head of whom stood Calhoun, unequalled in sagacity, and unsurpassed in patriotism. These contended, from first to last, that tho restriction was unconstitutional. This restriction, however, remained upon thes tatute- book until Congress, in the act organizing Kansas, determined that it had no right whatever, to legis late slavery into, or out of, a Territory; and that the power, in this respect, was with the people of the Ter ritory—thus establishing the doctrine of non-inter vention on the part of Congress. And tbe Supreme Court of the United States, in tho Dred Scott case sustained the action of Congress by pronouncing the restricting act unconstitutional and inoperative. Non-intervention being thus established, was bv the Convention at Cincinnati adopted as a Democratic principle, and is now recognized by the Democratic patty. North and South. Thus established and rec ognized, no ono will question that it is tho duty of every Democrat individually, and all Democratic bodies especially and particularly, to see that this doctrine is prerorved iuviolate; and if violated, to denounce its violator. In view of this doctrine. Southern Democrats (perhaps I had better write, the entire people of the South,) stand ready to, and will sustain as firmly the action of the people of a Territory seeking admission into the Uuion as a State, who may reject the insti tution of Slavery, as they will a Territory which may adopt the institution: provided tho people of the Territory are left to act independently; that is, without beiug influenced or interfered with, by any man, or from any quarter With this distinct recognition of the doctrine of non-intervention, (than which, no doctrine can bo of deeper interest to the South,) the Convention believ ing that it had been grossly violated by Governor Walker, proceeded to resolve, “ That the icaugural address of Governor Walker, in prescribing the terms on which Congress should admit Kansas, into the Union, and in attempting to dictate tbo submission of their Constitution for ratification, and what class of persons constitutes a presumptuous in terference iu matters over which be has no legiti mate control. And that the same address, in expres sing bis official opinion that Kansas would becomo free State, and in presenting arguments to support that side of tho question, is a gross departure from the principles of non-intervention and neutrality which wero established by the Kansas bill. Aud this Convention has full confidence that Mr. Buchan an will manifest his fidelity to tbe principles which carried him into office, by recalling Governor Walker.’’* These charges are grave in their import and dis tinct in their annunciation; they are two in numbly to-wit: 1- Prescribing the terms on which Congn should admit Kansas into the Union h and in attempt ing to dictate the submission of their Constitution for ratification, and to wliat class of persons. 2. Ex pressing his official opinidn that Kansas would be come a free State. The question is, are theso char, ges true 7 Let us see. tree 1. “ Prescribing tho terms on which Con- bLould'hdimt Kansas into the Union, and nt- mnting to dictate the submission of their Consti tution fur ratification, and to what class of persons ” Proof: " I repeat then, as my clear conviction, that unless tho Convention submit the Constitution to the vote of all the actual resilient settlers ot Kansas, and thc election be fairly and justly conducted, the Con stitution will be, and ought to be, rejected by Con- grets.’'--(jov. IP’s Inaug, Add, The Georgia Convention must not ho understood objecting to the Kansas Convention referring their Constitution to the authorized and legitimate voters, for ratification or rejection, as a majority of them might determine; but the objection is, that Gov. Walker attempts by threat and wish, to Influ- nce the Convention to do so; whereas, lie should have been silent on tiro subject. State Constitutions have been formed and referred to tho people--again, they have been formed and gouo into operation, without being so referred; there are precedents bot ways. Now, tbo Democrats of Georgia have no preference to express, as to which of these ways tl Convention should adop - , provided Kansas is fiuenccd in her action ; butthis.it is determined, U question to be settled by tho C'oMtution; and ths with it Gov. Walker had no right to interfere; hav. ing interfered, he departed from tho correct lino of his dnty, violated tho principle of non-intervention and proves him3elf guilty of the charge. Charge “ Expressing his official opinion that Kansas would become a tree State, and in presenting arguments to support that side of the question.”-—- Proof.-" There is a law, more powerful than tho legislation of man; more potent than passion or prejudice; that must ultimately determine the loca tion of slavery in this country, it Is tho isothermal line ; It is the law of the thermometer, of latitude or altitude, regulating climate,labor arid productions; aud as a consequence, profit and loss. Thus, even upon the mountain-hights of the tropics, slavery can no morc exist, than iu northern latitudes, because it is unprofitable, being nnsuited to the constitution of that sable race, transplanted here from the equatorial heats of Africa. Why is it that in the Union slavery recedes from tho North and progresses South ? It is this same great climatic law now operating for or against slavery in Kansas. If, or. the elevated plains of Kansas, stretching to the base of our American Alps, the Rocky Mountains, and iaelndiag their eastern crest, crowned with perpetual snow, from which sweep over her open prairies those chilling blasts, reducing tho average range of the-thermome- ter here, to a temperature nearly a3 low as that of New England, should render slavery unprofitable here, because unsuited to the tropical constitution of the negro race, the law above referred to, mu?f ulti mately determine that question here, and can flo more be connolled by the legislation of man than nny other moral or physical law of tho Almighty.— Especially must this law operate with irresistible force in this country, where tho number of slaves is limited and cannot bo increased by importation where many millions of acres of sugar and cotton lauds are still uncultivated; and from the ever aug menting demand, exceeding the supply, the price of those great staples has nearly doubled, demauding vastly more slave labor for their production.” I have nothing to do with Mr. Walker's rhetorical flourish, so abundantly conspicuous in the above quotation, further than to say, such things to me, ap pear to ba out of place in grave State papers; how ever, this being a matter of taste simply, to it I have no right to object. Mr. Walker goes out of his way here, according to his own showing, for the purpose of violating the doctrine of non-intervention—he is a volunteer in this; for if the causes that ho supposes really exist, every man in tho Territory knew th facts as well as he did, and those things needed not to have been alluded to by him. But whether ho b-3 right or wrong, in his statement, is not the question— the Convention of Georgia condemned him fur say ing any thing at all on tho subject: to him the doc trine of non-intervention interdicted the subject; on it he had no right to say one word ; having discuss ed it he becomes guilty of the charges made against him by the Convention. It is a matter of constant observation, that when a man permits himself to depart from the line of duty, ho is apt to go farther than he at first contemplated. So it is with.Mr. Walker. The notion that Kansas must be a free State, either for the causes stated, or others not stated, has such firm possession of Mr. Walker’s mind that he not only commits the gross outrago of arguing tho matter in his inaugural ad dress, but in bis Topeka speech he permits himself to aay, when speaking of submitting the Constitution to to the “ resident settlers” of tho Territory, at the time that tho Constitution is submitted—" Now, none of yon can regret more than I do, any of those de plorable and calamitous circumstances which have taken place in tho past. For myself, I wish to over look the past and look forward to a better and brighter future. That Territorial legislation (of Kan - sas.) has. in respect to the authority over this ques tion, been recoguized by the acts of 1856 and 1857.- That Legislature has called a Convention, to assem ble in September next. That Constitution they will, or they will not, submit to the vote of the ma jority of the then actual resident seitleis of Kansas. If they do not thus submit it, I will rol.v roc, fel low citizens, in lawful opposition to their course. And cannot donbt. gentlemen, that one much -higher than I, the Chief-Magistrate of the Union, will join you in opposition.” Well, Sir. Walker has the per fect right of choosing hia own political associates, and to the exercise of this right we interpose no ob jection whatever. Bnt wo do object to Mr. Walk 's thus disposing of Mr. Buchanan, for in him the Georgia Democracy have an unabated interest. To whom was Mr. Walker addressing himself?-— Was it to dissatisfied Democrats 1—no. Was it to dissatisfied Americans ?—no. To whom then, was speaking ? To men then in rebellion against the airs of Congress and rf Kansas / To the adherents of the Topeka organization ! To the rabble, many of them sent to Kansas by the Emigrant Aid Society, for the purpose of preventing the legal and proper organi zation of the Territory ! To abolitionists ! These were the men he vowed he would join, if the Consti tution was not submitted to all the actual *' resident settlers,” at the time of its submission. And having joined these, against whom was it 7 Against the late- abiding, orderly citizens of the Territory ! Was there ever a more palpable violation of a principle than there was in this ease ? For this the Georgia Con vection condemned Gov. Walker and asked his ro call. The Convention could not have done less ; it would have been justified if it had done more, to-wit demanded his immediate dismissal from office ; fur such a violation of the principle of non-intervention will nrit admit of either apology or explanation. I have seen it stated, in puliation of Mr. Walker's conduct, that “An overwhelming majority of the people now go with Walker for a constitution which shall be submitted to the whole people of the Territo ry.” (Mr. W. then, has been successful in mnrkin, out the oourse which the Convention of September is to pursue.) “The Southern pro-slavery men are satisfied with Walker. Elmore, formerly of Alabama; Stringfellow, one of the leaders of tho so-called bor- der-ruffians; the settlers from South Carolina, Geor gia and tho South generally, declare their entire sat isfaction with the course of the Governor, so do Doniphan and Atchison; Woodard, of South Caro lina, a few years ago one of the ablest representa tives from South Carolina, in Congress, and an esti mable friend of Mr. Calhoun; Locompte, Isaaek, and Whitfield, all sustain Walker’s course. The Missouri people who have large interests in Kansas, also approve Walker’s programme. And even tho Black Republicans—the Topekaites—have been completely subdued by tho skilful management of this shrewd, bold and practical statesman.” (With the truth or falsity of this statement, I do not propose to interfere; bnt, for the present, will allow it all to be true.) I have seen much besides, like this, going to justify Mr. Walker’s course; sometimes by anon ymous writers, sometimes by newspaper editors and sometimes over the proper names of individuals. Now, what I liavo to say, in respect to ail this is, that it has nothing whatever, todowitli the question. If the doctrine of non-intervention, was a question ot expediency, then all this would be applicable; but wt.en that doctrine is shown to be a principle that has been settled in tho most formal and solemn manner by the highest constitutional authorities of the land, then the above, andlike statements become altogether inapplicable. Those engaged iu making these efforts are attempting to reduce a principle down to n qnes- of expediency-, a thing that must not be allowed. Were Mr. Walker and hia apologists allowed to make this a question of expediency; (which always springs from the circumstances of tho case,) npon the organi zation of another Territory, the Governor, in pursu ing quite a different course to that of Mr. Walker, might justify himself upon the circumstances of the case, and thu3, would the doctrine of non-interven tion be completely destroyed. The Georgia Convention, in view of Mr. Walker’s unjustifiable course, said, “And this Convention has full confidence that Mr. Buchanan will manifest his fidelity to the principles which carried him into of fice, by re-calling Governor Walker there is no thing but what is perfectly reasonable and proper, in this. What elso could the Convent Require 1 It could not ask that Governor Walke^nould be rebuked, for rebuke simply, would not be adequate to bis offence. It could not ask that further instruc- ions should bo given Governor Walker, in which n bites to Kansas, my fiiend matter, he has held the balances -mdan upright heart. ever heard him express a desire, one ten. to the institutions of Kansas ” Thi } ,° r ’ the part of Mr. Buchanan, of the priafiS! tervention, cannot but be perfectly J*H C every Democrat, everywhere. BarfCHSu be supposed that Mr. Buchanan would “‘“‘•iifi tv against his administration, because to support a man which his party has a 0fhil W offender? Such a supposition is simol?'^ 8 ^ as such, unworthy of farther attenti-n * kjar ‘ 1 fit But, when should Mr. Walker be , other very important q uestioa The . 1 1 question I, for one, submit to Mr B„ ^ ntio, »of v notBgreo to embarrass his adminkw I '' quiring hitr^o dismiss this officer son^ 0a ’ k .’> circumstan K-s of the case, as they are k '' and unknown to me, will justify. Belis”- 0 * 0 to *i\ Buchanan will vindicate the principle veution, by tbe removal of Mr. Walk 8ou a day as that act can be done, I ahaUnal - * 1 “ ecl ’ having unabated confidence in Mr ■Uelity to the principles which carried But, I will here remark, that under -ny I! 0 ® 1 *’ cumstances and at every hazard, I * ]l 4 tion of the Georgia Convention. 0,<1 ®tae^ I have seen the letter of Judge Thomas man of the committee of twenty-four) *’• 'V the adjournment of the Convention ’ n^'S object of that letter, as I understand it, b, 1 * 11 '* a newspaper for its unwise course, M .^t Georgia Convention—so far as the newsn !|>Wi % cerned, I agree with Judge Thomas. tion of the letter which relates to Mr B° would have been glad had Judge TboaJ7^ selfjustraed in expressing himself diff we „r ^ upon that Tetter aud its author, I have p, condemnation to utter; for I can very well *** * how a vigilant aud faithfui sentinel; der the conviction of the violation of'the tr"* ol his party, and seeking redress in the tri** zeal may require to be done at cnce, what n* Cfl * ture consideration, he would be willing t 0 • **■ I rejoice to know that Georgia, (my diberate in her conuncils; true to herr ’ • and firm to her resolves, has had devolved the vindication of the doctrine of non inter/" 1 * and that tho stand assumed by Georgia ettWt: is the sure guarauty to the party at"larce^ principles of the party are sacred in her and_will be defended at all hazards. aUfi ® lam your obedient servim HOWELL COBB, For the Macon Telegraph. Walker and Kansas. Mr. Clisby In the Savannah News offe I 8th inst., I find the following piece, aiidrts. pectfully request you to insert it in y 0QrM . per, as it expresses exactly the sentimeiUd those of us, whom the Richmond tool would 1 spit upon. [ Permit me to add a few comments; the oc-1 casion demands it. The unhappy creatcrs states au untruth. He would have it under- ( stood that none but those whom he sneerin;. ly terms “a handful of secessionists,” and tb I tried to save the South from her death wound I in 1850, are dissatisfied with Walker and Ba-*[ chanan, and thereby have it be believed that the complaints, touching Kansas afftin, are not only factious, but unpatriotic; wba' thc creature wells knows, that the first ai I most zealous movants, in this condemnation^ Walker’s conduct in Kansas, are, and but! been from the first, those who were the most zealous leaders in opposition taths Southern Rights party in 1850, calling themselves yar excellence Union men. Doubtless they have acted from patriotic tnc- tives, both then and now. They thought tha that their compeers in tho free States vat really alarmed for the Union, and were ready to do anything that was right to save it. They have found out since, that it was only theakra of the highwayman when he apprehends his victim is about to escape.—Many of them, more over, on deliberate reflection, have changed their opinions upon - the constitutional rights of those measures; and none more remirti- bly than some of the grave Judges of theSa- preme Court, who, iu their zeal for the sncces of the measures of 1850, soiled, somewhat (a wo thought,) the judicial ermine, by drsgjg it in the mud of polities. Yet they have bi to retrieve their error, and vindicate the pr triotism of the Southern Rights party, in tb Dred Scot case. But whnt about Walker? I am not going to insult those that can read!*hy an argumat to show that in his speeches in Kansas he iater- fefled against the South, and sided with thefre* soilers; children can perceive that. Bnt la free to confess, that whatever he said or cas'd say, neither had or could have any effect, it did not change one vote, nor encourage or da- courage anybody; Kansas teas a conqumi province before he went there. Don’t charge tbe loss of the battle to Walker, and thereby dignify a “poor shoat.” The old patriot At chison made a true report, in the words of C*- sar, from the field of—not victory,—bat defat We came and saw, and were conquered.' - - Reason why—the abolitionists have more mo ney than Southerners, and more zeal; sad they, from thc first, have been suffered to com mit murder, arson, and treason withimpnmtji whereby slave holders have been deterred from settling in the Territory.—And this tp pears to have been the result of a deliberate design from the first, on the part of the Feder al Government, in appointing free soil Gover nors for Kansas, where slave holders can H- ( and Southern Governors for Nebraska, where they cannot live. But is it fair to make a soap® goat of Walker, a weakly proconsul, because ho uses words calculated to discourage South ern men, in their struggles in Kansas, andkt off his master, the consul, who thanked Goo publicly that he was raised in a free State • And let off too, his military prototype, G eD ’ Cass, the Sovereign Squatter, who denouia ed on the floor of the Senate, the code ofli'” made by Southern men in Kansas, “a disgra^- to a civilized age;” when I defy him or any e-® else, to point out any law in that code for * 1C , I cannot quote its parellel from the statutes' Georgia. Then, I say again, letuscease • ing at Walker, so long as we fear tobearu betters.—But why bark at, or beard any |- them, since they arc the best wc can get • so far as Governor Walker or his employe- sided with, or countenanced the enemies of the lie should be directed to abstain, for the future, from interfering in matters over which the Convention of Kansas alone, had Control, for that would not reme dy a past injustice. But above all, it would have been criminal in tho Convention ol Georgia to have asked leas, (and it would be crimnal in Democrats everywhere, to be satisfied with less,) than Walker's ro-eall. Wdl he be re called ? is the momentous question— I do not hesitate to say, he will be, he must he. That Mr. Buchanan will permit so gross a violation of tho principle of non-intervention to’go unpunished, Is an unreasonable supposition. Mr. Buchanan’s own course upon this, and concomitant questions, is all that the bitterest enemy could ask—all that liis friends should require. I am in possession of information which I deem altogether unquestionable and satisfac tory, that upon the question of slavery, “Whatever I10 thinks and believes, he keeps to himself, other than tho rights which wo of the South claim uuder the Federal Constitution ; these I10 will stand by and defend to the latest moment of liis existence.’ Th.s is all that the South requires, on that question. And with regard to the doctrine of non intervention, as •lick South, by word or deed, whether it bad 3". effect or not, no honest man can have any 110 ^ that was both wrong and ungrate ini' when they undertake to deceive the Sout an untruth, that Kansas is not s labor, their conduct has another oa 03 ® ' v ‘ can be found in thc dictionary. Nevertheless, why draw off the the Southern people, from their true con 1 by bidding them look at such tiring’ 0 , hour, as Walker and President Buchan^- They are soon to pass away. But wl )0 s ° ^ pid as to believe, that the conditio 0 South is transitory, and that it U e P c ® ^ on who is to be consul or proconsu • , she is hereafter to be other than a C ? D( ?„y 5 ! province in the Union, with miequa ^^ No one of intelligence doubts this- ^ our friends in Kansas are right, iu ma l3 ° best terms they can with their coa ^ >tdiel t Let them take care of themselves-- e turn land speculators—let the® throw up their caps for freedom am 1 ^ cy, and so get office, for this is the j can do. Yet the tools about WasbmS Richmond, are not justified in falsely ^ ing, that they do this of their 5®V oa !J that they would not have slavei'j 11 3