The mirror. (Florence, Ga.) 1839-1840, September 21, 1839, Image 2
TEm'SliltßOß.
•'•• • - ■: ' . 9 .
Mil nrday, Sept*Sl, £ 839.
For Prc*i.lrnl f
GEOItGE M. TUOUP.
No 12 at! lie ft tio n .
* ¥
For Governor,
cu\ i: lies dof v ni: n t i
FOR THK LEGISLATURE.
SF.XA TE.
LOVER D r. ;vAN.
if r: r n es e v 7 vj nv es.
WILLI VRD BOYNTON,
JOHN WEST.
JOSEPH WOOD.
Our reader- must excuse the hurried
manner in which our paper of today is
in i le up hy the crowding in of old adver
tinnents, &c. The fact is, when one poor
fellow has to act the parts of Editor, f'ore
ii.an, Cos n > isitor, Pressman and Devil,
his patrons should be content with whal they
can get.
At a meeting of the citizens of Florence,
on Hie 17th inst, assembled agreeably to
previous notice, for the purpose of appoin
ting Delegatts to the Colton Convention to
be held iu Macon on the 22d ilist, resolt lions
were passed adopting the sentiments con
tained in the Circular, approving of the
Convention, to be held at Macon and np_
pointing Col. D. P. flillhouse, J. T. 15.
Turner, J. D. Pitts A: M. J. Lnuren ce
Esqrs. as Delegates to reprcsentjthis sec
tion of the county in saitl Convention. We
were requested to publish the proceedings
of this meeting but regret exceedingly, to
state, that it has been entirely out of our
power. Several articles prepared for todays
paper have been nessasarily laid over in
consequence of the circumstances under
which we labor at the present time.
Mr. Galbea Mathews, an eld an I respecta
ble citizen of Stewart, was shot at Lnnna
liassee, on Saturday last and died immedi
ately. The matter appears to be involved in
considerable mystery, and nearly every one
tells a different tale, so we will not att mpt
to particularize until we hear the result of
the judicial investigation that was going on
in the case at Lumpkin some few days since.
JUDGE MCDONALD AND THE TAS
SELS CASE.
We again refer to th.s subject, for the
purpose of noticing the anxiety with which
the Van Buren press are endeavoring to
screen their FEDERAL, SUBMISSION
candidate from the odium and just indigna
tion cast upon him by ihe friends of liberty
and the Rights anil Sovereignty of the State,
in consequence of the detestable vote given
by him in the above mentioned ease, when a
member of the Legislature in 1830.
The greatest exertions that have yet been
made Jo exculpate him from the charges
preferred against him ill this case, and to
wash from his political character the fou'
stain his own conduct, in this instance, lias
iudelibly stamped upon it. arc to be found in
an article emanating from the Standard of
Union, edited : v Thomas 11 ivncs, K-q.
who introduced the Resolutions in the case
of Tassels,sustaining yj:e RIGHTS, S< >VK
REIGNTY AND INDEPENDENCE of
tli ‘ Stale, and against which JUDGE Me-
D )NALD RECORDED A NEC.A I'iVE
VOTE. In the article ju: t alluded to, it i
argued that the reason why Judge M< Don
aid dul not sus'.aiu the resolutions subiuiit. and.
was, th.it he reposed entire confidence in the
Executive and Judicial officers of the State,
and consequently was com n; to leave the
management ot the w ole affair In them,
and tileri ore deemed the. action of the Le
gisia. ire altogether unnecessary.
Lei every man. who wishes to become
correctly igformcd on th s in <tt**r. read th‘‘
extracts iu today’s pa,>• r, from the Journal
■of the H iuse ot R * 'rcsentatives of la3o.
aud iC will perceive the principle at once,
which influenced the tioiiorai ic gent email
au lUi 'Se who acted wiih li.m. Be ieving
in (be ail comm Img power of tin; Supreme
Court, but fearing, in those days of Repub
lican purity to acknow ledge, openly and m
de;e*nJei.tly, his principles, he sustains a
subsiit'ite to the original report, that con
siders the matter “Unfavorable to
OAL ! DieLlßc-RA I !QN.” a.ad that the
“ACTION OF THE LEGISLATURE
is deemed unnecessary.” At
the same time, evidently for the purpose of
sneaking out ol a difficulty, as honorably as
possible, into which his principles were n
bout to involve him, great confidence ix ex
pre-serl in the Executive and Judicial au
thorities, thereby, also, .throwing the entire
responsibility upon me shoulders of these
Officers.
Now, i; ;s quite immaterial *vhrt gruiny
Haynes may s..y of t'ue degree of confidence
reposed io our Cnixl Magistrate by those
»ho opposed th-* resolurions sustaining the
eove-eignty of,the State, or the want of that
Confidence on the p*art of those who sustain
ed tha original report, bs that is aha mere po
litical nvinauvrc, far the purpose of leading
pcopla astray in relation to Judge Mc
course aud principles-; .because,
if there were any in the Legislature at that
tune uho could lack confidence in the Exe
cutive, they must lo ve been those whoop
posed t .e report ol the committee, as iu
them we recognize Federalism ol the deep
est dye and if we are not very much mis
taken, every one of lti<*.:» be ged to the
old Clark :>a ! y—a party that had ever been
• h'uiifieii with Federalism, and to which
the Executive and Judiciary officers had ev
er been opposed.
But the Im t is, there was no one who hail
■my reason to doubt the course the Execu
tive would pursue, as he expressly and dis
iuctly i.dorinetl them, in communicating the
subject to the L gislature, “that any attempt
to enforce such orders, would be RESIST
ED with whati ver force the laws had placed
at his command.” Then, there was no
cau>e for the want of confidence, and no
one could reasonably entertain anv le irs as
to the fidelity of that officer. But, as is
customary in all ca-es m momentous im
portance, it is ihe duty of the Legislature
to give that encouragement to the Execu
tive that the exigency es the times sugges
led; and none tint those who w<*re ready to
acknowledge tiie right ofilie Supreme Court
iu this ease, an I vVILLf ffJ'o SUCCUMB
to her maiidfs, would have REFUSED
to SUSTAIN the report and resolutions.
But why should the Van Bur"n pres* en
tlc.ivorlo screen lodge McDonald from the
odium cas. upon him in this case by the
friends of Slu e Rights and m ite Sovereign
ly] We cannot answer, as tire authority
claimed by ill* .Supreme Court has been re
cognized as one of the fundamental print i
ples of the Van Buren party- Yes, we
c iirgeit upon (Item, an I they DARE NOT
DEN Y IT, that they believe the Supreme
Court is the proper tribunal to decide all
cases arising under the Constitution, be
tween tlie States and individuals, or between
a State and the General Government. It
seems to us, therefore, that to be consistent,
and that the principles of their party be
sustained, they should, instead of endeavor
ingto excuse the matter and palliate the of
fence of ihe Judge, contend for the correct
ness of the position assumed by the Su
prnme Com t. and prove, if they ran, the
truth of their doctrine, that that tribunal
HAS THE RIGHT to COMPEL A
STATE TO YIELD OBEDIENCE TO
HER MANDATES, and ABIDE IIER
DECISIONS.
It may be asked, however, l>y some, i*
tiles; are the principles of the Van Buren
party, why did such a large inajoiity of the
Legislature disapprove of the action of the
supreme Court, i ml sustain the rights, sove
reignty and independence of the Stale ; as
there surely, were more of that party in the
Legislature at that lime, than the twelve
.. ho oppose I the leport and resolutions of
the Committee ?
We answer, and again repeat, that in those
days Republicanism shone forth in its most
bril'iain odors iu Georgia, and .diffused such
a ray of light throughout the land, that the
“wayfaring man, though a fool, might not
err thereinand indeed, lid itinfusesuch
a spirit of patriotism in the breasts of Geor
gians. that had the Supreme Court or Con
gress attempted to wrest from us our rights
and liberties, manv a strong arm would have
been made bare in their defence, and many
a breast laid oppn to the assault, of the ene
my, ere the invaders of our rights could
h ive accomplish and their designs. But re
collect this was iu the year 1830, audbiar
in mind that the celebrated author of that
report and resolutions, in those days, fought
nuder the banner of State Rights and Lib
erty ; remember, also, that all this took place
two years before the immaculate General
Jackson issued his celebrated Proclamation,
which gave such a trerr minus impetus to
FederVism, arid you can readily account
why it was that Judge McDonald stood, al
inost, “sold: rv ami a one,” in the c.isp above
alluded to. Had ihe Proclamation of J ck
son been published to the wor'd—had the
spirit of Federalism, which that document
infused into the hearts of many of our citi
zens, ha.l an existence in that day we should
have found II ivncs, and many others, side
by side with McDonald, ready to yield up
our libc tics to the mercy of the Supreme
C ) ft, or willing to join in the cry tint (lie
•natter was "unfavorable to calm delibera
tion,” and either have desired the Si ne to
bow OB ED! KNCK TOTH E M AND ATE
or eml“avur to s!ii fiie off the respon-ibility
J by expressing m eat confidence in the Execu
tive and .1 mliciurv.
We again call upon the Ropi h lie an peo
ple ol Georgia, Io examine this mattei tho
roughly— reflect well upon the principles of
the two contending part cs in the State—
llie one battling for the Rights, Sovereignty
and Indejiendrnec of the State, with Judge
Don liorty as its leader; —the other ac
knowledging the authority of the Sui rente
Co'Tt to in erf re with a sovereign Side in
the execution of In r bus; ath fitting the
right of the Federal Goveinm nt to invade
the territory of a Stale with the armed min
ions of power, to COERCE her into a SUB
MISSION 'TO ITS WILL; and contend
in : for all the other vi'e principles of Fed
eralism and Couselo Union, with Judge Mc-
Dmahl, a full blooded blue-light, as its di
rector atid guide.
We are well aware that there are many
who snppor’ the Van Boren party, without
reflecting, fora single moment, upon the a'd
important matters involved in the course
pursued by them. Many, who are as true
Republicans as ever (rod American soil, aie
supporting Federalism of the blackest hue,
I without knowing or consideiing what they
are doing; but having been gulled and de
ceived, in the out set, by the fascinating
charm of UNION, they think of nothing
e!s<*, and seem to be perfectly indifferent
what principles they support, provided the
word Union is attached to them. Such we
are endeavoring to convince, and are desi
ions of doing so by fair, open and.logical
reosjuing; and could we be heard calmly
and dispassionately, we are sure .he most
obtuse intellect would become convinced of
the incorrectness of his course, and, with a
giant’s strength, burst the shackles that had
been unconsciously, thrown around him for
the purpose ol biuding him to the footstool
of Federalism. Take the history of the
party that has assumed to itself the specious
cognomoii of “Union, ’’ and examine the
political character and conduct ol its leaders*
and you cannot find, siuoe the days of the
Proclamation, a single niolher’s sou of them,
who lias ever sustained the rights and sove
reignty of the States, and many ol them who
never did. even anterior to that time; and of
this latter class, we cannot forbear to men
tion the bite and present Fedeal candidates
for Governor, who, if they have ever beeu
ronsistent in any thing, it is their opposition
to Republicanism, and consequent maintain
ance of Federalism, “in the most vulgar ac
ceptation of that term.” Then, how can
any man. who claims to be a Republican in
principle, sustain and support a party, the
rominept leaders of which are so deeply
dyed in Federalism and Coiisoindation ?
We answer, NONE. The man who be
lieves in tlie Rights of the Stales and the
liberties of flie people, as secured to us bv
our patriotic forefathers, cannot act consis
tently, and supiKirt those who maintain such
dangerous and pernicious doctrines.
Then, let every true patriot and republi
can arouse from his lethargy, and examine
the situation lie sustains to his country—let
him look at the principles of those lie sup
ports, and then ask himself: ■ Is this Re
publicanism; and in sustaining these who
thus believe, ami supposing the liberties ol
my country; or am I lending mv suffrages
to those who would crush the fair fabric of
lreed< m, and trample our sacred Constitu
tion under their unhallowed feet ?” Let
questions like these be seriously and ealmlv
asked, and impartially answered, and Geor
gia will still stand triumphant in the ranks of
Republicanism, with DOUGHERTY as
her Chief Magistrate ; norwi'l Federalism,
Consolodation and Van Burenism dare
show the deformed and detestable heads.
FEDERAL TOWER.
We never have the misfortune to get a
peep at that “pink of perfecti m,” the Stan
dard of Union, and therefore many tilings
appear in that paper of which we might
take cognizance did we exchange with it;
consequently, whenever any thing emanates
from that press we never see it unless it is
copied into some other paper with which
we do exchange. In this mai ner we have
seen that celebrated production which has
been going the rounds of the Union press,
boastingly headed, “D fend your candi
date,” in which an effort is made to prove
that Judge Dougherty is not a State Rights
man! This, however, has been so satisfac
torily answered in an article from the Ash
etis Whig, signed “Old Facts,” and the ta
bles so completely turned by our able co
temporary, the Georgia Journal, that it
would be useless in us to pursue that cart of
the subject any farther, our only object is
to rail the attention of our readers to the
following extiact from the Standard, con
tained in the article referred to :
“The people of Georgia want no man for
Governor, who has ever admitted, by word
or deed, the right of the Federal Govern
ment to invade the S'ule with a military
force, to centr'd her in the exercise of her
sovereign Rights.”
So far, so good ; and for one time, at least,
in the course of his political life, has old
uncle Tommy told the truth, as far as we
have quoted. But he might have gone a lit
tle farther, and staled that tiie people of
Georgia would not recognize the principles
of a party as Republican, nor be ruled by
surh a party, that admitted that risrht in the
General Government; and yet a little fur
ther and said that the people of Georgia
would s ipport no man for the Presidency
who claims this tyrannical and arbitralv
power.
But what astonishes us is, the brazen es
frontery with which the above paragraph is
penned, as t lie editor, and every bo ly else
knows, that Judge McDonald, the whole
Union party and Mr. Van Buren stand ob
noxious to this charge.
Did not Gen. Jackson claim 'his right in
1832, and not only claim, but threaten to en
force it? Wlio lias forgotten that the arm
ed minionsof the Federal Government were
marched near the borders of South Candi
na to INTIMIDATE, or. if necessary, CO
KRCE hcrinto SUBMISSION? And who
does not know tiiat Judge McDonffil and
ti e whole Union party shouted ‘well done,'
to this stretch of Executive power? Then,
accoidifig to tli * opinion of the Standard ol
Union, the people of Georgia will not have
McDonald forth ir Governor.
Who that is at all acquainted w ith the af
fairs of the country, does not recollect the
passage of the Force Bill, and that tiie pro
visions contained in Unit hill give ti e Presi
dent power to invade the territory of an in
dependent State, with an armed force, *Mi
control her in the exricise of lu r soveieig
rights;” and that the deed was HAILED
and SANCTIONED by JUDGE Me DON
ALD nod ti e WHOLE VAN BURE N
PARTY from Maine to Lnuisianun/
Then, we anr ounce, upon the authority o'
the Standard of Union, that the people oi
Georgia WILL NOT HAVE Charles .1
M. Donald to rule over them.
Anti this doctrine is still held by the Vai.
Bnrcti party, ami the present Foleral Ex
ccittive, “to follow in the footsteps,” claims
the right. We presume the people have
not forgotten the ten thousand minute men
raised ir: Philadelphia, to do the bidding m
the President, and that their services were
ACCEPTED by Mr Van Buren, with the
pledge to hold themselves in readiness to o
bey his commands at a moments warning,
and it necessary, drench their swords in the
blood of all who should dare oppose his will.
The people are awgie, also, that this con
duct met the approbation of Judge McDon
ald, aud therefore, if the Standard of Union
can be relied on in this case, the people ol
Georgia DO NOT WANT, nor WILL
NOT HAVE Judge McDonald for their
Governor.
No, they will not. Things like these are
no* to be forgotten—our liberties are too sa
cred tn thus trampled upon, without oeing
lemcmbered, and when the day of trial
comes, the opponents of liberty w ill find that
the people know hoiv to appreciate their
rights by selecting, those who support theta.
“The Georgia Mirror, published iu that
State, is i cieuitable little sheet—so Ur as
talent goes, but on every political topic it*
Editor wakes it an invariable rule to take
tiie wrong side—it is impossible lor him to
go right even by accident.”—N't. Jose >h
Timet.
We dost our beaver and make our be..t
buw to the 'i unes, tor the -cieditaim:' notice
it lias taken ol the Georgia Alirror. What
a pity it could not embrace the Editors in its
commendation. These things are so com
fortable, you know, to a man who receive*
more “kicks than coppers." Our friend of
the Times would uo doubt have gratified us
in this small matter, had he not lelt a little
of toe Irish iu him. He had just complain
ed ol gelling rush/, and that he would be
compelled, of necessity, to have about wu
somebody. We little thought, howevei
vben he was drawing his coat and rohuu
lif) bis sleeves. :hat he was going to try tin
strengtuof hts muscles on our noddle; bin
we happened to be iu the way, and he ado;*
led the miller's rule, Jirst come, first served.
The Times always receives a hearty wel
come to our table; there is a vein ol good
ho oi in its columns that makes it otien an
agreeable companion. The style too, is pi
thy; I ire Editor appears to be in earnest.
kVelike to see a man, when he attempts to
ik> any thing, do it with his might, but we
are not obliged to believe everything he says
fair commend every tiling he does. This
observation, so true in thecoinmon concerns
«f life, is peculiarly so iu regard to politics.
When the Editor of the Times, therefore,
says, “that on political topics, we make it an
invariable rule to take the wrong side, and
that it seems impossible for us to go right a
ven by accident,” we may believe just as
much ol tiiat as we please,you know. Our
friend may think so, but that does not make it
so. It is a bare assertion, too—perhaps the
argument is left to us; well, how does this
-oood: The Times is attached to the Ad
ministration party, of which the President
ol the United States is the head; and the
Mirror is attached to the opposition party,
or if you please, the State Rights pa-tv, and
the old doctrine being true with tho Times,
ihat the King can do r.o wrong—Ergo, the
Times is right and the Mirror wrong.
We might make the same sweeping deeln
ration ol the Times that it has of us. but
what would it all amount to? We would
just say ‘ o our friend, don’t look cross-eyed
(he uext time you take a look into the Mir
ror. If you should not like the phiz r.-fle -
ted, after yon do your best to see straight, let
us hear some reasons why.
Foil THE Htr.r.Oß.
Messrs Editors —As the first Monday in
October is fast approaching, it behooves eve
ry one to lie upaud doing—if we do but litt'e
let us do it with cheerfulness, and discharge
the high duty we owe to our country for her
future prosperity and happiness.
Our Government, fellow citizens, has been
instituted and laws enacted for our welfare,
to advance our interest in times of peace,
add protect us in times of trouble. Ami !
venture this assertion, without the fear of
contradiction, if our Legislaiive, Executive
and Judiciary officers had, from the time the
Federal Constitution was adopted, kept in
view the interest of the people, both in Gen
eral and State Departments, we would nol
be the people we are. But many have act
ed for self distinction and emolument, to be
called great—perhaps willi gto choose in
famous notoriety, rather than obscurity.—
You have it in your power to say, who sli ill
enact laws ar.d who shall execute laws by
which you are to be governed. Y’ou have
it in your power to improve upon firm fotm
dation, the fair temple of freedom, o» demol
ish it forever. Which of tlie two do von
choose? Let us choose the former. Let
us endeavor to keep tiie foundation of oi r
rights, our privileges, our ail, firm and im
pregnable. Let us not mistake Rail Roads,
and State Banks, and gold and silver, for the
foundation stone for these, of themselves,
compose but a very small portion of the su
perstructure. And we r ay,by imprudence
and folly, build rail road upontai! road, char
ter bank upon bank, amass gold upon gold,
forgetting, all the while, the basis upon
which we build, until the superstructure be
comes too ponderous fertile foundation, and
it falls, to crush us beneath its ruins.
I tell you fellow citizens, that double
faced men, striving lor executive authority,
cannot be honest; and take their example
from the cradle down, if followed by a ma
jority of the people of the United Sta es,
would stain, forever, that bright ortjlamme of
liberty, and leave it a ray less sheet, black as
thei- own hearts, without one star to light us
on to glory. Yet they are called patriots
ay hundreds and thousands, and especially
by many newspaper devils, who put on the
garb of parly, and screen themselves behind
the liberty of the press, to fill their empty
pockets and sound their empty names.
Aristocracy coi- mauds the awe and admi
ration of too many in this country, for the
epublic safety. Ido not mean that sweet
•ieented,jewel-decked, monkey aristocracy,
vhich now and then flits before us, with
hearing mock, heroic and social converse,
the lord of languages; but 1 mean that aris
tocratic feeling, backed by intellectual pow
er, which strives for political promotion, with
gold as a talisman, to accomplish till. We
are too apt to be b aseil by their power, and
hy our suffrages work out our own ruin ; for
it is foul corruption, and destructive to tiie
equality recognized in the Constitution. In
humble obscurity may dwell a being who
could guard our liberties like a once ob
scure Washington, and while the rich and
consequently great, boast of patriotic a
hievemeuts iii sell praise, many a poor wiJ
>wed worn in could bring her sons, in the
s rength of youth and “owi-r of virtue, who
id never walked in the halls of the learned
ior strolled in the saloons of splendor, and
offer litem upon her country’s altar, and say,
ike the good Cornelia, “these are mv jew
ls.” Moral excellence and not riches, be
•evolenf actions, and not pomp and fictitious
iggraiidizement, have sustained ns thus far.
and must alone sustain us until our political
xisiei.ee terminates.
Even now, whenever the true lover of li
'(•ry. with the eye of imagination, tr-ils
hack to kingdoms ~nd nations, once mighty
fid prosperous, now only alive in the poet's
■ raiusa id moralist s tales,and sees the cau
*es of their downfall, lie shudders io think
that the same causesare uo.v in our Imsoms.
to sting and corrode until politic. I life is > \-
t net. Hi trembles to think that I lie same
latent evils which caused ihe sun of other
republics to sit in eternal darkness, -ire now
drawing chose thirteen bright stars down to
the ocean of everlasting ninth., and nought
but the moral power of a Joshua can com
mand them to stand still.
Wake up! wake up!! for corruption’s
fang has dar ed venom to our heart’s blood.
The hour of revolution, 1 awfully fear, is
last approaching, and when it comes it will
come in thunder and in tire, amid .>roans aud
curses; dissolution’s struggle will leavens a
lifeless corse, with blood our winding sheet,
our grave oblivion.
I speak not wild conjecture. A great na
tioti, in ages past, boasted of freedom aud
glory, and battle fields, and heroes, and tri
umphal cars, aud other circumstances oftri
uinnh and splendor; but corruption entered
—the rose on the cheek of the tfneeo of the
world, withered aud died and she now lies a
sad memento of for ner greatness—the mo
ther of dead emnires, blasted and scathed
by tempest and fire, aud earlliq lakes, and
war and pestilence, the throne of desolation’s
lord, the despot’s footstool, the home of fan
cy not of freedom.
With the history of the past before us,
(), fellow-citizens, let us be wise to guard the
foundation of our country’s greatness.—
The call of your country is imperative
ob*y the mandate with all your energy : be
up and adoing; preserve, pure and uupolu
e I, the fair temple of liberty, m youih, that
i old age you may enter withm, aud enjoy
he fruits of yogr labor iu peace anil happi
ness. STEWART.
From the Southern Recorder.
TO THE STATE RIGHTS PARTY
OF GEORGIA.
The election of Chief Magistrate is
rapidly approaching, and you will be shortly
called on to say for whom your suffrages
stiall be. cast. You have now the decided
majority in the State. You can elect your
candidate by a majority of four thousand
votes, and return a majority of thirty mem
hers to the next General Assembly, il you
are but true to your interests and to ' our
country. Will you, my friends, improve
the occasion and gloriously triumph in the
struggle, or will you lie down in fatal se
curity and permit your opponents to tic you
hand and foot, and thus fettered, fasten the
galling yoke upon you again ? Georgia
expects every man to do Ids duty. Your
opponents are anxious to ensure you. iftliev
can. Every cause for disaffection is care”
lully hunted up by them, and thrown into
•>ur ranks. And when none can he found,
• heir overweening affection for yon induces
them to fabricate those which mav serve to
distract. Knowing that we were strong and
that they were weak, they early corn men red
they work of distraction. First, they said,
• hat incurable divisions px sted amongst us.
from tii- fact that Col. Lamar had not bein
nominated as our candidate. Tim devoted
patriotism of that gentleman and I is friends,
smm sealed the late of that malieioue slan
der. Next, it was said, that fie friends
ol Mr. Dawson vould not support our
candidate because he had not been n' initi
ated. Eoon that base fabticaiiofl was nailed
to the counter. Soon came the truth-login g
facts of vcorrs ol letter writers from Cherokee
that Judge D'unrt ertv would tor unite
his political friends in that region of country !
When this wonderful fad was analyzed, it
appeared that o e gentleman had expressed
.I'hter uitiation nit to vote far him; but
yet in his stead there were hundreds of his
political opponents who so much admired
the nnm, that they would he found his
efficient and zealous supporters. Thus Las
detraction been employed to divide aitd
prostrate your party; but yet our phalanx
is unbroken, and we will go on most glo
riously to triumph iu the principles we have
hitherto silt ported.
Another low aud despicable effort has
been made to mislead us : Seizing upon the
strong excitement in reference to the license
law, it has been curiently reported, that
•fudge Dougherty had signpii th« notable
petition! Upon enquiry it appeals that
neither of the candidates had signed it; nor
had it been nor would it be presented to
either of them. Tilts was this wicked
misrepresentation stript of all its mischief,
and row, as a last resort* when everv other
falsehood has failed, it is urged as a ground
ol objection, that Judge Dougherty present
ed a petition to the last Legislature, which
edition sought a repeal of the license law!
How desperate must that cause be wi ich
has to resort to such alternatives to sustain
it! Admit the charge to be true, what does
it prove ? Judge Dougherty was President
of the Senate, as sucli, a petition is placed
n his hands directed to the body over which
he presides, could lie, dare be withhold its
presentation ? Did the discharge of his
official duty determine his opinions either
way ? I say it did not. Now at the ses
sion of the Legislature Mr. Speaker Du
presented. as 1 am informed, a petition*
forwaided from Hartis county, on the same
subject. Did that commit him to the sup
port or opposition of tiie measure? No:
and it would be gross injustice to him it
urge such an argument against him. A' and
y p t why is it that these Union men censure
in Judge Doueher’y what they silently pass
over in Mr. Day! This shows you. mv
friends, that they’only seek t > divide vour
ranks, and elevate their own candidate to
office. Power and office, and hs profits are
a.I they desire—give them these and they
will trample on your necks, and laugh at
your simplicity in being duped by tin in.
Blit elect McDonald Governor, and give
them a majority iu foe Legislature, and
Judge Dougherty, as Presi lent of the Sen
ate, might present petitions and defend them,
through life, and their tongues, now so
eloquent in defence of liberty, would lie as
silent as the grave.
Now, lor whose benefit tire you called on
to forego till your I'oiuci ] reiiilectici.s <A
party and political principles ? For ulmse
benefit are you to sacrifice your own politi
cal friends, surrender your own polit ctd
power and influence in the State? Why
for the benefit of such men as Mr. Thomas
Ilayues, who has beeu fattening in office or
the last six yeais; rolling in its luxuries, and
reaping, through the public Treasury,
the means by which to support a public
newspaper, in which lie has traduced your
character, as a party, vilified your princi* les,
and denounced your patriotism. And who
becomes the honored object ofyom surren
der of principle? Charles J. McDonald.
And who is he? A man clever and honest
in private life, hut possessing not one politi
cal principle in common with ourselves ; not*
possessing an intellect tiny thing above
mediocrity. Y'oc have seen him at tiie bat,
and iu ihe Legislature; and did you ever
hear Irom hit- at either place, at any time,
a speech which showed the least sharpness
nl intellect ? With a mind weak and in
active hy natxre by commendable industry
he has filled it with many valuable law
principles, until he has become a respectable
lawyer. <>n tiie oilier hand, look at your
own candidate: endowed by nature with a
genius i 1 the highest order, lie never fails to
captivate by his eloquence, »ither at the Bar
or in the Le_i,latm*e. His opponents all
award to him the possession of a highly
elevated genius. Asa lawyer and a states
man, he stands without a rival. Raised .it
the plough ham 1 s, self-made, and almost
self-educated, bis genius has raised him to
the highest distinction. As to his political
sentiments, you know full well that they ac
< ord entirely w ith your ow n. Not a princi
ple which your party advocates, has ever
laded io find in him a zealous supporter.
Indeed, it could not be otherwise, when he
has stood so long in the very front rank of
ynur political associa’es.— Contrast with his
the principles of his opponent. Who can
tell his position, aud where to find him?
At oue time the advocate of a National
Bunk, and at another an advocate es the
Sub-Treasury; aud again the supporter
the Pet Brtiik system. As hi* intert*
has inclined so lias his course been chulj
gtit.
He has been found consistent in butene
thing, and that is Ins opposition to Southern
‘principles ami rights.” When the
Northern fanatics were goading u S wffh
the yoke too heavy to he home, in t| iu
merciless exactions of the Tariff, J L j„ e
McDonald stood -ide hy side with them
defending its constitutionality. AViien that
same heartless power sought to take fiom us
the right of punishing crimes committed in
our State, Judge McDonald united v.nli
them in their crusade against us.—-When
the Supreme Court attempted to prevent
our State Cuniis from punishing a murder
er who had been condemned to die, Jud< e
McDonald took sides against the very peo
ple, aud their laws, over whom he now seeks
to preside as Governor, and in favor of the
enemies of our rights. When culled upon
by his vote iii the Legislature, to act as a
representative ol the people of Georgia, he
denied that our right to punish crimes against
the peace and good order of this State
was an original and necessary part of sove
reignty, which the State of Georgia had never
parted with.—-When asked i! the attempt to
pi event the administration of the criminal
laws of the State was not a violation of her
rights? he said no. When asked, if ;J
Governor am! .ill other officers should not
disregard the mandate of the Supreme
Court, for the puraosc of arresting the
criminal laws of this-State ? he said no.—-
\V lieu asked, il the Governor should tint
resist and repel any invasion upon the ad
ministration ot the criminal laws of the
State? he said no. When asked, if the
State of Georgia s’.iau! I co.n,mount her
s ivereignty, ail independent State, as to
become a party to a ease before the Su
preme Court J uis answer w.u equivalent to
an affirmative.
Can such a man as this receive the r'to
of a State Rights nun? No, never. And
why is *it hoped that any of yhi could be
persuaded to cast your v ites for him?
Because it is said, that u.s l’resident of the
Senate, Judge Dougherty piesented ape.
titisn directed to the body* over which lie
presided, asking a repeal of the licens** law !
Do our opponents think that we car U-be
divided by such a contemptible insinuation
as this/ Do they think that we will lav
down tiie ptiriciplcs for which we have been
struggling Cor yens! those principles upon
which aie based out* go*eminent and ail
our institutions ? surrender up into the hands
ol Federalists and Consolidatioaists, the
only true doctram sofßepnblicanisin ? No;
tell them not to deceive themselves bv such
idle calculations. Whatever mav be vour
predilections, either l«r or against t e re
tail law, remember that it contains no po
litical piinciple whatever, and has no con
nection, whatever, with political parlies.
'Tiie principles upon which vo ir govern
ment is I);.:.ad, should be the first object of
preservation; and never, my friends, lose
sight of the ii, let uhn'ever siorm of furv nr
interest come that m iy. Si«**re nler them,
and you surrenderffineny an t its blessing*
at once. The U sion party have sounded
tlio rally, in the “S aiiilard of Union,” to
their friends; arid exhorted them net to l e
divided by the excitement. In fit l y
the cunning to which they Live resor
ted.
Your country expects you not to allow
divisions in your ranks It lias been but a
few years wli nyou weie in a hopeless ami
helpless niuordy. With scarce one-third
of the members in the Legislature, (he
thousand votes minority in tit * Sta *, you
have risen safely a.t 1 trill n>h mtly in o
power. The misrule of the Union par's
lias driven the people to yur support;
your loltv patriotism, while in tiie minority ;
the noble dismteicsiedneKs which dis
tieguished you then; the gallantry with
which you rushed to the battle field, when
a savage foe invaded your teni ory; the
wisdom and economy of your legislation,
have all conspired to wit. for you the co. fi
dcticeofa virtuous people. Relying upon
these, they have hope 1 to find in your
goTernmeut and prudence the re lempttou
of their country from the bankruptcy and
misrule which has h ten brought upon it by
the ignorance and cupidity of your oppo
nents. Let your country rev lize its lio| es,
hy your uiuicd *'tul tiinint haul action at the
approaching clection.
You are strong and cannot be defeated, if
you but will it. One false step may now
riv< t for years the strong chains of tyranny
which you have so recently shaken idt.
Remember the treatment ol your political
opponents to you, when they had the
power. The best talents of the State exiled
from office; every member of your p arty
disfranchised, from the smallest postmaster
to the highest office; while inefficient and
puerile men were elevated to power—and
for no otln r reason but that they belonged
to km the party." Remember these things
and take care not 'o be instrumental, hy
your own divisions, in again creating them. —•
Let me entreat you, to dismiss all prejudice
from your minds; railv, to a mau, to your
candidate <nr Governor, whom your oppo
nents both hate and fear; elect to tiie
Legislature your best and most talented
men; and then you will not only triumph
now. but will insure a triumph herealter.
From mv youth i have been unhid with the
State Rights party. 1 have stood by you
“shoulder tu shoulder,” iu the darkest hour
which lias ever surrounded you, and 1 con
jure you, by all the ties of out common
kindred, never to permit your principles to
be trampled beneath the feet of your adver
saries, hy your owe. imprudent divis
ions.
ONE OF YOU.
From the Georgia Journal.
‘DEFEND YOUR CANDIDATE.’
We unhesitatingly and cheerfully cent
ply with the requisition of the Staudaid
of Union ”to publish the whole >) the proceed
ings,' in the celebrated 'TASSELS case.
That JUDGE MCDONALD may have
that reward dealt out to him hy fhevoteisot
Georgia, which is due to him vho bi
perform duty, when the rights of his
State are nsniled hy tie Supreme Court, ni
tiny other creature ot the Government, is.
all that we wi*h; and il tin* resolution intro
duced bv Mr. Turner ol Putnam can. in the
least possible degree, mitigate his offence be
fore the people, we will enable cur neighbor
in giving it t at publicity which he so aDX
iouslv desii es. and so modestly demands.
“The following written eon mumcatioti
was brouelit from the Governor by Mr.
Pierce, his Secretary, to wit:
iExrcuTJVK Dm'abtmfnt. j;
Miliedu-evilie, 22d Dec. I*3o. i
I submit to tlie Legislature, for its consid
eration, tiie copy of a communication re
ceived this day, pm porting to be signed bv
the Chief Justice of the United States, and
to be a citation to the State of Georgia, to
appear before the Supreme Court, on the se
cond Monday in January next, to answer to*
that tribunal, for having caused a peisonw Im
had committed a murder within ihe limits
of the State fobs tried and convicted there
for.