Below is the OCR text representation for this newspapers page.

nanHignMnnHBHHniiiHMnMi ■wnHRppqii THE MACON TELEGRAPH: WEDNESDAY MORNING, AUGUST 8, 1894 SUPREME COURT OP OEOROIA. Doclslons Rendered Monday, August 5, R9«. Aherns ft Ott Manufacturing Company , vs. Patton sash. Door and Building Company et al. Before Judge Tutn- bull. City court Df Floyd county. L Where It affirmatively appears both from the bill of exception* and from the certificate of the Judge thereto that no part of lb- r.:-onl \* m-i'-mviry to be neen hero by tnonecrlpt, the writ of error will not be dismissed because there is no transcript. 2. While successive garnishment!! may Issue In a pending esse commenced by attachment, yet after the case has ter minated In a judgment against the de fendant in attachment no further gar nishment can Issue founded upon the same attachment, notwithstanding un Issue may atlll 4>e pending between the plaintiff and a former garnishee touch ing the troth of the answer made by 'the latter to a garnishment issued In due time. 3. As the defendant in attachment, as well as the Karnlshee Is Interested, the question of whether the garnishment has legally Issued the garnishee does not, by answering tbo garnishment, waive his right to have dbe proceeding* dismissed St the hearing of an Issue traversing his answer, the ground to Ihe motion to dismiss being that there was no legal authority for Issuing the garnishment because judgment had pre viously been rendered against the de- fendant In the attachment suit, and thus the suit us a basis of summons of garnishment was no longer pending. Judgment affirmed. Henry Whlger, by brief, for" plaintiff In error! Dean & Smith, J. E. Dean, by brief, contra. Hamilton ft Co. vs. Moore. Before Judge Henry. Floyd mperlor court. There was no abuse of discretion by the 'trial court In denying a continu ance. The evidence of general cn/noin was admissible and the vcrdlot of the jury sms nbt without evidence to sup port It. Tho superior court did not err In overruling the certiorari. Judgment affirmed. /'■’at Harris und C. A. Thornwell, for plaintiff In error! no appearance contra. Boos vs. Batty. Before Judge Henry, i’olk superior court. Ufter the defendant In e suit upon n promisery note, brought and tried m n Juetico court, has established In that court the defense of payment, failure to reduce tho defense to writing be fore tlia Jury la strict In the superior “uet to try an nppi.nl taken by the plaintiff, will not preclude the tiling of a proper plea of payment then ten- dersd unless it afflimatlvoly appears that some Injustice will be dons the Plaintiff by allowing the plea to bo Hied. Where, on tho contrary. It of- flrnfitlvely appears thut ths same de- fenso sought to bo act up by the same defense sought to be eel up by the plea litigated in the Justice court it was not proper to permit the plea tc be filed. This ruling Is made In full view of tho aols of September Sd, 163,1 (Acts 1662-13. 1>- 10U October ID. 18SD, (Acts 1684-86. p. M7), and October 10, 18al, (Acts 1BS0-S1, P. JI>. Judgment reversed. Colville Noyes, for plaintiff In error; Irwin Bunn, by brief, contra. iVstice vs. MoHurnett ft Price. Before JlAlge Janes. Haralson superior court. n. Where one purchased promleory notes given for tho purchase money of lund und took a conveyance dt the land Itself, knowing at the time that the makers of th<* notes had surrendered the bond for titles to the maker there of, nnd aftorwnrds took pOfeMtdoo of the land by his tenant, ho when doing so having tho title to the land in him self In consequcnco of Uio conveyance nude to him when he purchased tho notes, he should too treated, relatively to third peraons, as having rescinded the oontraet of salo mude by the orig inal vendor, especially where no poasos- Bfon under that contract hod ever ex isted. If, subsequently to such reels- Ion nnd while having possession to tho land by his tenant ho sells the notes to others lor value, and makes a con veyance of tho land Itself so -that these pttrmssre may convey title to the orig inal purahyuters of the land when the notes shaft ho paid off, concra ling “tho fact of recession and tho facts front" which the reolsslon results, namely the surrender for the toond of miles and tho taking possession of the land, and also presenting tho makers of the notes to be solvent when In truth they were utterly Insolvent, the concealment nnd the representation, tnken together, will amount to tho warranty of tho notes, both as to title and solvency; nnd in an action sotting forth the warranty and alleging Its breach, he Ik liable to damages for -the amount, whether paid In money or property, which ho received for the notes, tho notes themselves toeing worthless. 2. A recovery on the warranty 1m not tendered toy the fact that the title to ihv Und \» vnnv.'.wil t.. the plaintiff* lit the time they purchased the notes, the object of this conveyance being not to invest them with title as owners, tout us creditors ns makers of the notes, and as security merely. If these notes toad been extinguished ns debts against the makers by mason of tho iseUon of the original contract of salo and the resumption possession toy the de fendant as successor In title to the ven dor, there no ddbt to be secured toy the conveyance made toy the latter to the ptaHMffs. and all that would be necessary to adjust the equities be tween the par Oort would 'bo -tor the plaintiffs to recover on the warranty und reinstate ’the defendant In his title to the land; all of which tons toeen pro vided for In the verdict, the suit being one In which equitable relief could toe and has been administered. 3. In a sale of property at an agreed price, the seller having received In pay ment other property u; «u agreed price and In addition thereto {promisor? notes on third persons also at an agreed price, in an .action against him «upon a warranty of the notes neither the mar ket value of the property sold nor tho market value of that received, exclu sive of the notes, 1« relevant In measur ing the damages, unless It appears that the price* fixed toy the partis* themselves In -the course of the trans- action were Axed, not with reference to <'A*h an a starMard, tout with some special reference to the medium of pay ment, and rontoequenmly that tMN prices were different from what they would have been If uninfluenced by the element of barter. Where price Is fixed toy special contract of the ppttlea, market value Is generally immaterial, 4. Neither upon the merits, nor upon any of the numerous small points. In- eluding the newly «!i-«*v-n*d t*\ ;.!«-no«\ Is there any cause for a new trial. Judgment affirmed. Ostoto A nnd W. F. Brown for plaintiff In error. | Adamson & Jackson contra. NVatson vs. Long et al. Before Judge J mee. Douglas superior court. Where the first order fixed the time for bearing the motion for a new trial and granted leave •’until the hearing'’ to make out and file a brief of the evi dence, an i by subsequent successive or ders different times were fix**d for the hearing and It was expressly provided tbht within « time limited by «*ch the brief of evidence should be approved. It not appearing that any brief wua presented for approval until after nil these limitations had expired, a further continuance granted at it term succeed ing that to which the hearing had last been continued did not necessarily car ry with It the right on the part of the movant to have the brief of evidence approved, t the time fixed tor the bear ing by this last order, ns against an unwillingness of the Judge then to £ VISIT Inff cards, wedding invita tion*. leceptlon caitla, etc., engraved promptly In Pur own establishment In this city. Samples anil price* sent free. J. P. Stevens ft Bro.. Jew- elt-re. 47 Whitehall atree't, Atlanta, Ga. erclse the power of approval. Hla re fusal to approve the brief after a lapse of nearly eighteen months from the date of trial was not error. Whether, aa a mere question of legal power, his aoprirval would have been valid or not. tt was certainly not an abuse of discre tion to decline to approve the brief af ter such ii lapse of time. Juilcmvnt affirmed. McBride ft Brown and W. T. Rob erts, for plaintiff in error: Adamson ft Jackson, contra. Martin vs. Kendrick et *1. Before Judge Harris. Carroll superior court. The evidence warranted the verdict. The newly discovered evidence, If true, would only tend to discredit tlfe plain tiff’s witnesses awl would throw no di rect light of It* own upon the contro versy. The court did not err In deny- nlg a new trial. Judgment affirmed. G. W. Austin, by brief, tor plaintiff In error: Oscar Reese. W. F. Brown, W. C. Adamson and C. P. Gordon, contra. Hun* v*. Hunt. Before Judge Harris. Heard superior court. 1. A warrant against a father on a charge of kidnapping his own minor children, It not appearing that he had ever parted with hi* paternal right to their custody Is a nullity; and a writing executed by him while under arrest, purporting to surrender to the mother his paternal authority, la not binding, the same being procured by duress. 2. Where the husband ami wife are living In a state of separation, the county bf the husband's residence la the county of the minor children unless he has consented to their acquiring a residence elsewhere, or has voluntarily relinquished his paternal authority over them, or has been otherwise legally de prived thereof. 2. Under the evidence In the present case, the ordinary, adjudicating upon a writ of habeus corpus, did not abuse Ifs discretion In awarding the custody of the children to their paternal grand parents. and the superior court erred, on certlnrarl. in revemlng the ordinary's decision. Judgment reversed. P. H. Whitaker ft Son. by brief, for plaintiff in error; W. H. Daniel, contra. Formby vs. Shackleford. Before Judge Harris. Heard superior court. Until an execution issuing from a Justice's court tvas been properly ''backed," a constable of a county other than that In which the writ was Issued has no authority to make any levy or return by virtue thereof. Con- nequsnfly, an entry of no property to be found, mode by such a constable, on an execution before it was "backed" will not suffice to keep the” Judgment on whlah uhu Judgment was founded from booomlng dormant. Under sec tion 2614 of tne code, the entry mutt be made by an officer authorized to ex ecute and return. Judgment affirmed. V. II. Lofton, by brief, for plaintiff In error. W. H. Daniel contra. Moore vs. Drawer & Co. Before Uudgo Brown. Oily court of Carroll county. 1. Although, upon the trJ«l of n trav erse of tho ground of »n attachment, the burden of proof be on the plain tiff, yot, where he successfully carried the burden, a charge uf the court that the burden was upon the defendant sviiu harmless. 2. An attachment being amenable, the affidavit und bond may bo looked to In iafd of the writ Itself,- when it la wanting In certainty as to the person against whom It was Intended the writ should Issue. And where with such aid tho Mentlty of the person can tw as certained beyond all doubt, tbo attach ment should not 'bo dismissed because it merely dlecrlbed tne debtor us having in hla possession tho property to bo seized, and does not designate him ns a debtor or as tho defendant in the proceedings. 3. Tli* sheriff's return of levy does not negatlvo tho possession of the de fendant in attachment toy stating that the property was aclxed at a specified railroad depot. 4. A -motion to rule out the evidence* without stating upon what specified ground the motion was rested or -What objection was made to the evidence, is not for review. 'A statement th.1t the ©videnco umi '•illegal.” Without disclosing »why it was illegal, is too general. 5. The evidence warranted tne ver dict, both as to the ground of the at tachment and as to tho main oaro. 0. Where the attachment aim. -h« traverse to the ground of attachment were tried together and the verdict found for the plaintiff a specified sum for principal and another for Interest; with coets. and ngnlnet the travenie, the signature of the foreman follow ing both findings but fccparatcd from the latter about one inch in space, and the two findings themselves being sep arated by a like apace, the signature wus MUfliclent bo. authenticate tho whole verdict, nothing appearing which indicates or suggests that it was not meant to apply to tho whole. Judgment affirmed. Q. \V. Austin, toy brief, for plaintiff In error; S. lloledrnesa, by brief, contra. Perryman, odmlnlntrator, vs. Pope. Be fore Judge Harris. Carroll superior court. 1. it was not error to charge the Jury In addition to section 2637 or tho Code, or as preliminary to giving that section in charge, that a threat on the part of the creditor (to whom the note in suit was made payable) or hla attorney, to resort to law would not amount to duretw, the only throat disclosed by the evidence being one to l«vy on the debt or's property. 2. When an attachment CAM come* on for trial and there is a pending traverse of the ground of attachment, not pre viously disposed of tor the term by con tinuance or otherwise, the whole case should be tried together; and It was error for the count to exclude legal and competent evidence offered by the de fendant *to establish the truth of hla traverse. the exclusion being rested on the theory that the ground of attach ment woe not open to traverse after the property attached had been re ceived. A* was ruled In Brumby vs. Kickoff. October term, IteS, the right of traverse Is not lost or affected by repley. Judgment reversed. Kec*e A Grow and lteld & Stewart, for plaintiff in error; Adamson A Jackron, contra. Shelton vs. Hokierncee. Before Judge Harris. Carroll superior court. L When husband and wire ore sued Jointly, but not as partners, there is tvo implitd authority in the husband to em ploy counsel in behalf of the wife on her credit. 2. Whe*% In employing an attorney m such cuxe. the hiuband did not profe#e to be the agent of his wife or to have, any authority from her. but stated that he fetnsatt was Insolvent and did not dealre to make any defense, but hla wife did, the attorney cdukl wot rightly Infer lt»t tho defen** was to be made on the joint credit of huebund and wife, and no joint action Is maintained again* them for his compensation, although the attorney en tered a defense for ths wlfs alone and rroaecuted It successfully, end the defend. afetS both knew that he rendered these eervtcea and the wife era* present at the trial, consulted with the attorney and tnotified as a witness, she saying nothing to him touching bis employment or fee; and he saying nothing to her on tne tub- [j*ot *»d It afflnuAUvety appearing by Smiling as the Egyptian Sphinx is the Suit man. This is his money losing time. If you buy as you ought to buy from today’s offerings we’ll be poorer by some hundreds of dollars tonight. It’s a matter of pride with us to lose wisely. All that ought to be yours, not oiirs, come under drastic prices. Cost counts but little, quality pleads in vain. We can offord to drop money now in order to be rid of cer tain lines and we no. MACON, GA. 351 to 353 - - - CHERRY STREET |iiluU| UU1UUUJ SAW MILLS. Machinery All Kinds. $100 HBBM worm of ihe undisputed evidence ot herself and her husband that no authority to employ the attorney liud been given by ber. ana the husband testifying that bis under standing was. that the employment was by himself alone and on his own credit, though'IOr his wife's benefit. Judgment reversed. Cobb ft Reese, for plaintiff In error; no appearance contra. THE NEGRO'S OPPORTUNITY. From the Memphis Commercial. The following article has appeared In the Liverpool (England) Post of the 7th Inst.: "Aatmuylwa, native prince of Jebu Remo, West Africa, whose striking ap pearance lus created some little sensa tion as he has driven about the cl'ty Utfa week, la still at the Northwestern Hobel. He is visiting this country on a dJplomtlc mission, hla hope being that he may induce our government to de clare Un* tirrtory of Jebu Romo an In dependent state.protected by tba Brit ish power. He Is to huvo an interview wltn'Lord Rlpon next week, lit' recog nition of the services rendered the col ored race by Miss Idu B. Wetla, for merly of Tennessee,whose eloquent ud- voiucy of tho claims of the negro to humane atmeut has been frequent ly noticed In these coCumns, Prince Adcmuylwa entertained her to'dinner at the Northwestern Hotel, and invit ed several of Uw> African merchants re.-Id-Jit In Liverpool to ntefi her. The Rev. C. F. Akud was alab Zt gueat. Complimentary epeedhes wend made by (the Africans, to which Miss Wells und Mr. Aked respond'd. Prince Ademuyl- w.t, It will be Been from our advertis ing columns, Is to attend a service at Pembroke chapel tomorrow night, wlieii -Miss Wells I» to deliver h-'r fare well noUri r-a tn this country, " and is himself to iiddro.se the congregation. The Africans Inatbendance upon Ade- muylwa twur ordinary English dress, bul. the prince hna not put off the gor geous state lobes wlilelilie wears In hts own country." Wo hsm nlwiys contended, with Site'll rearons ua wo have been tfble to devls.-, against the proposition to lie- port the Southern negroes. But lu view of the Post's utitlrlc, we confess that all our arguments come to noth ing; that our ptvmlsss were altogether wrong, nnd that we labored under a plentiful luck of Information. We have held to the idea that In the Southern stat, » the negroes who behaved them selves enjoyed the happiest possible conditions of life. Wo laive urged tost as long us .they treated the whites well they would be treated well by the whites. We have said that their labor wjtb nppreefafr *1 as contributiJiff to the prosperity of the South. Tlxwfore, wo todvo proLectod fgttlott the deportation to Afrlo*. Now it Is with much cha- grlu Ihnt we are forced to ndmlt our error. Wlw-n wo cont*'*nplate G>e gor- rcoutnees of Axlemuyhva, Prince of Jebu Remo, at lw? travels In state about a rate (Britain; ** we resurd the *kUl with which he employs the knife aud fork at hU meals, instead of hla rtr.Kore; via we porcelvu the futility with which lie accommodates himself to tlv* usases of whut Is heM to bepo- ilte socletyln Great Britain; a* we ob serve the acknowledgement of his so cial equality by the peers ofthe realm us w* hnve nil those futeis before us. we are bound to urant that African civilisation has readied a. development of which wu h.ul not dreamed,»and of which the explorers of khe Dark Con tinent hid fatVed to inform us. Living ston and t*pvke. Stanley nnd Kmin Bey hnve no truth hithem. Behold tho ref- utHtiou In th* v splendid presence of Ad- Amulywa. Prince of Jebu Remo! He Uikos Ida to hi* heart. He welcomes hor as a deliverer of his race fropi the txnofcitre "-he wtolt* man lit the Southern He tcCls her to pro- creM In her noble work, and to count uijvii him :*9 festally. It Is n most en gaging scene, and the. waiting Jeems, all smiles and nutoeerviency. twirls his na|»kln In admiration, while the Rev. Mr. Aked foUi his tyet In thanksgiv ing rant he l« i*c*cm at such a cable, and on HUi'h an occasion. And what an oceatton It la—the meeting of the sub- Hme I'riiiiv ;ind un Am -d in minion*l- ry, rtv* former the representative of n good African civilization, the tatter rhe ♦*ml**ury of a furb irons country! He informs her of Ihe glories of the land rant Males In Ills dispensation. He whljper* to her of tt»> delights of a eocWU *>*st.xn which permits men and RteM to dSipsOss with clothing. He re*la.!e« to her the Joys of tribal war fare and ronints his own victories w!vre*by he wtte enabV'd to sack tho village^ of the neighboring prince, and out of tlie spoils found a university for ttie cultlvstlon of the liberal arts. He Invites her to visit hhn arti to Wm from personal observation bow inviting 1« the land of which he Is the ruler. Why, khen, should not the black* of the Southern statra welcome an opportunity to become the subjects of an African poterttab* who in his own P*f#''n ex«tepttfifs the magnificence of htoi domlnlotM? Why should they toll In tho cotton fields and be coment with the wa^tv of Honest labor, wtm they may g> to Afrks and p«*rchance be- coro>» equerries. tords-in-waitfng, chimbrriiin5 or ministers to hit high- ness Adcmuylwn of Jebu Remo Watches or Jewelry Given Free now and October 1. 'Every cuibmer given an ojh Uiii yi/L GEO. T. BEKLAZiD, S:0 Second SL TICKET FOR THE LILLY WHITES. Dullns, Tex., Aug. 7.—That division of the Republican party of Texas known as tho Lilly Whites placed the following ticket tn the Held for stato officers: Governor, J. D. Smith Donton county; lieutenant-governor, W. 21. Mann of Dallas; attorney-general, W. H. Atwell of Dallas; comptroller, Tom Johnson of Snn Antonio: treas urer, A. A. Davis of Hearn; chief Jus tice, Lock McDaniel of Harris. “At 30 Man Suspects Himself A Fool; Knows It At Forty, And Reforms His Plans; At Fifty Chides Hlj Infamous Delay- Resolves and Re-Resolves, Then dies The Same. 1 * Whee The Poet Young Wrote These Lines, The Man Was, Perhaps. More To be Pitied Than Blamed. But Since The Const! tutloe Offers The Great Encyclopedia Britannlca At Ten Cent* A Day There is J No Excuse For Such A Failure In Life. Order While Introductory Rates Are On. Write to The Constitution,. Atlanta, Georgia, For Application Blank.' Paints, Oils, Glass, Sash, Doors, Blinds* LIME, CEMENT and BUILDERS’SUPPLIES. T. C. BURKE. Write for Quotaiions_^Maaai Before Placing Your Orders. o. P. & B. E WILLINGHAM, MACON, GA. SASH. DOORS, LUMBER. MW K LIME UNO CEMEHT, AT LOWEST MARKET PRICES. LMDIIG WHOLESALE HOUSES. G. Bemd & Co. Manufacturer* and l>osisr«,4 BAJUfEti* SADDLER*. LEATHER AND SHOEFlDINQl MAOOW. OA. am. 45J.464SM «8 CherryStresL L. Cohen & Co., J “lUuol*"—Boat So. Cigar lu Mscoa. J. L. MACK. Msnsssr. | Disttlkte and Whoissols Dealers in 461 Cherry Street, Mxooa. Gfc 1 UQUOBS, TOBACCO sad OlOiat Prtefifl Always the lowest. j Parlcnlar attention paid to Orders. MACOH SASH, DOOR b LUMBER CO., INCORPORATED CAPITAL, $60,000. CONTRACTORS and BUILDERS, AND MANUF JLCTURERS OF Sash, Doors and Blinds, Scroll and Turned Work. Dealers in Paints, Glass, Cement, Putty, Lime, Plaster, Hair. BUILDERS’ HAltDWAE, Em | Queen of the Mountains. PORTER SPRINGS, so universally and so favorably known for years as Queen of the Mountains, is open under the same management (Us owner) as hereto fore, with same unsurpassed table fare and low rates. Board by month H per day; by week, 4L60 per day; lees than week, $2 per day. . . y New hack line contractor, with new hacks and new teams, leaving depot, Gainesville. Ga„ on arrival of morning train from Atlanta every Tuesday, Thurs day and Saturday, going through In seven hours. Fare 22; trunks, $1 per 100 pound*; valises, 25 cent*. Altitude 3,000 feet above sea level; 2,00® feet above Atlanta, 1.500 feet above Ma rietta and Gainesville, 1,200 feet above Mt. Airy, Clarksville and Tallulah Foils; 1,000 feet above Lookout Mountain and Asheville—affording the greatest change of climate possible south of the Mltchel. Chalybeate water, the strongest in the state. Baths, billiards and ten pins tree. Music for dancing every evening. Physician al ways in attendance. Dally mall. Refer ence confidently made to all visitors 6f the past ten years. For further inform** tlon address HENRY P. FARROW, Porter Springs, Lumpkin County, Qa, SALE OF COLLATERALS. The Exchunge Bank of Macon, Ga., will sell before the court house door in the city of Maoon, for cash, to the high est bidder, during the legal hours of sale on rae first Tuesday of September next 167 1-2. shares of the capital stock of the Planters’ Real Estate Cbmpany of Macon, Ga., of the par value of one hundred dollars each, and represented by certificates numbers 11, 12 and 13 of aaJd real estate company; certificate number 11 being for. ten shares; certifi- 12 being f)r 100 shares; certificate 13 being for 57 1-2 shares. The said shares Of stock standing on the books of said company In the name of H. T. Johnson, late of Bibb county, d^co-ased, and hav ing been by the said Johnshn- during his life time delivered to the said Exchange Bank and pledged by the said Johnson («s collateral to the said bank to secure certain indebtedness due to the said Exchange Bank toy the firm of Johnson & Harris, of which firm the said H. T. Johnson was the senior member. The sale of the collateral stock ibtove described is had for the purpose of en forcing the collection of the Indebted ness which It is pledged to secure. The notice required by law bf the intention of said Exchange Bank to sell Fold stock as herein advertised has been giv en to all the parties at interest. THE EXCHANGE BANK OF MA CON. GA. Macon. Ga.. July 31, 1894. MACON SAVINGS BANK 67S, Mulberry Street, Macon, Os. Capital and Surplus IU0.M0.0I Faya 6 per cent. Interest os deposits ot |1 and upward. Real estate loans on tbs monthly Installment plan, end loans on good securities at low rates. Legal de- pojitory tor trust fund*. Will act at administrator, executor, gutrdlan, receive, and trustee. H. T. POWELL President H. G. CUTTER ..Vice-President J. W. CANNON .Cashier Directors—Geo. B. Jewett, A. E. Board- man. H. C. Tindall. H. G. Cutter, 8\ SL BrubI, H. T. Powell. Samuel Altmayer. EXCHANGE BANK, OF MACON, GA. 5 H. J. Lamar, __ Geo. B. Turpin, President. Vice-President* J. W. Cohen 1m. Cashier. We solicit the business of mwah ant* planters and book* offering them courtesy, promptness^ safety mad liber ality. The largest capital and •\upl\m of any bank tn Middla Georgia. THE UNION SAYINGS BANK & TRUST CO M1COIT. GEORGIA. H. 1. Lamar, President; Geo. B. Ture ptr. Vlce-Preaklent; J, w. Oabanla* Cashier; D. M. Nelllgan. Accountant CAPITA!* 1200,000. SURPLUS moot Interest paid on deposits l per cent! per annum. Economy 1* the road to wealth. Deposit your asrlnga say they will be Increased by Interest. Com pounded semi-annually. Madison Avenue HOTEL, ... Hadlson Ave. and 58th St.; NEW YORK. Sj/rr day end uf. . American rim. Fireproof and first-class (n every par- ticular. Two blocks from tho Third and Sixth Avenue Elevated railroads. The Madison and 4th Ave. and Belt Lino cars pass the door. * H. M. CLARK, Psos. Passenger Elevator runs all night. WARM SPRINGS. MERIWETHER COUNTY, GEORGIA, On a spur of Pine Mountain, 1,200 feet above sea level; delightfully cool cli mate; no malaria, dust or mosqultoa. The finest bathing on the continent; swimming pools 15 by 40 feet, and In dividual baths for ladles and gentle men. Temperature of water 90 de grees—& cure for dyspepsia, rheuma. tlsm and diseases of the kidneys. Nets hotel, with all modern Improvements. Dlreofc' ccnneotion made via train* leaving Macbn at 4^5 p. m. und 4:15 a m. on the Central. Terms moderate. For Information apply for circular! at C. R. R. office or to CHAS. L. DAVIS, Proprietor. LAW SCHOOL Mercer University. Full faculty, unequalled advantages. Fall term opens October 1. For catalogue, etc., address CLEhl P. STEEP, ill ;.| Secretary Daw School. Macon. Ga. I end Whiskey Habl’.a I cured nt home mth* I outpaln. book of pa:* W. Z. JOHMtTOS, W. A. Dara, FrosidsaL Vico FreaitlcaL Bowub IC. extra, Ooarstary and Trouaf« The Guarantee Co of Georgia. Writs* bonds for ea*M«ret treasurers i aatnl.tr* tore, sxtautors. aturdlans. carers, ut «o*a s (ntrsl ttduoh OIBcs Mi Isooaft itrxt. PROFESSIONAL CARDSL. DR. J. J. SUBERS. Prrmabently located. In the >i cUltlss venereal. Lost energy : stored. Female Irregularities a pot-on osk. Cure guaranty Andress In conlldencs, with Stan 110 Fourth street Maoon. Ga. I , DR. C. H. PEETE, ETE. EAR. THROAT AND NOSE. Hours, t to 1 and 2 to 5. Telephone M. Office, 672 Mulberry, oorner Second street Macon. Ga. I.J I DR. t. EL SHORTER. . j DTE, BAR, NOSE AND THROAT. I Office 646 Cherry St, Maooo. Oa. CHARLES L. TOOLE, DENTIST, 418 SECOND ST. J. M. Johnston. President J. D. Stetson. Vies President L. P. Hillyer. Ckehler. The American national Bank, MAOON, GA* CAPITAL..wr y .. .r ..$250,000 00 BURPLU3., * r „ „ ..$25,000.W Largest capital of any national bank lit Central Georgia Accounts ot banks, corporatAoas and indi/iduals will rtceivs careful attention. Correspoo*, cente invited. l OF MACON. GA. CAPITAL 1 SURPLUS, $260,000 R. H. PLANT, PRESIDENT. W. W. WRIGLEY, CASHTBP L C. PLAIT'S SOI, BANKER ESTABLISHED 13SJ BACON, GEORGIA. Banking is all its branches. Interest allowed on Tima Deposits We handle foreign exchange and arrange travellers credits on Messrs. Rothschild of