Newspaper Page Text
THE MACON TELEGRAPH ; SATURDAY ' MORNING, JULY 20, 1901
A
^iW
SUNDAY AT THE SEASHORE. #
“Tybee by the 5ea.”
Cool and Invigorating Sea Breezes. Delightful Surf Bathing.
Improved Hotel Facilities. Season Orchestra.
-VIA-
$2 Special Sunday Outing
New Pavilion.
\ 4 Saturday Night
good returning
Monday Night.
Palace Sleeping Cars.
Elegant Day Coaches,
Parlor Cars.
Leave Macon 4.45 a. m.
“Seashore Special.”
Telephone 305 for Sleeping
or Parlor Car Reservations.
J. M. Mallory, T.P. A., Macon. E. P. Bonner, U.T. A., Macon. J. W.Blount, P. A., Macon.
1
TUB WRONG MAN.
Manly Tripp, Who Killed J. J. IIooil
lu Lauretta, Not Arrested.
DUBLIN, On., July 19.—It developed
that the perron arrcMted In Alubama,
supposed to be Manly Tripp, who in
April, mu, nhot and killed Mr. J. J.
llood in this city, turned out to bu the
wrong man.
Some months ago a man turned up
at Enterprise, Ala., which answered
tha description of Manly Tripp. At the
Instance of City Court Sheriff John D.
Supreme Court of Georgia
(Continued From 1'itge Three.)
conflicting, warranted a finding that
the plaintiff's husband was killed by a
train operated by the defendants, In
consequence of the negligence of the
employes in charge of the same; and
„ . , . ... . ... . there was no abuse of discretion in re-
639. Brunswick and Western Itallroad fusing to grunt a new trial.
Company vs. Wiggins, Action for J Judgment affirmed. All concur,
damage.. Before Judge Huneell. Bcr- | Erwin & Brown and Vaaaer Woolley,
rlen superior court. ; for plaintiffs lu error; Arnold & Ac-
Llttlo, Jc—L While a Jury trying a: sold and Hamilton Douglas, contra.
cnao should give to the evidence of a
witness only the weight to which It Is, 1 643. Smith vs. Ferrarlo. Before Judge
In their opinion entitled, yet they can- Held. City court of Atlanta.
Prince of "this* county, Tho man" "was i?.fr nlr V a V2 n 5! i 11 ?, , 7 U * I, I ¥ lile ‘ Since the fact of the
arrested. As noon as Mr. Prince was J JJlX?l2S*k P i h f« f ?»? 1 thut , , t •*i»tence of a partnership can not, ng
advised that the arrest had been made' P a P lnst ^ on e denying it, be lawfully
he left for Alabama to bring the man 2i22L?L !l? m °£LVJ2 R,Jf „ B J./ r . b lrar y *h°Wn by deelnrittlons of another al
to Dublin, first obtaining a requisition' JiUhS -„ i. 1 !? 1 ”"?• a l d f ,eRed member of the firm, an Instruct-
from Governor Candler op the governor) ilJ u £TSJ l iL}£ fl nr *5 n effect HhoxiUl I ,on which warranted the Jury In giving
of Alabama. The officer at Enterprise , 55.'... . | evidence of this character such an ef-
met Mr. Prince at Montgomery; Ala., n«!l e?L?. ef ? ndo i?e & lo the | wi * erroneous,
with the prisoner, whom Mr.* Prlnco! fi? *2L l i C V of orgu*) Although the evidence In the pres-
pronotinced to be the wrong man ns i * n *. C “ H0 *!*•/ . h * v ** required a finding
soon as he got a good look at him.
He states that the resemblance of the
rnnn under arrest and Tripp is very
‘riklngnnd that one who did not know
rtpn well would bo deceived.
Tripp shot down Mr. Hood without
any provocation
Trip,, well would be deceived. ‘J® eomrolMlon of the act which
Tripp .hot down Mr. llood without “ i? ‘‘.'iT'}. T.™ ' vronK , f ! 11 ' V,'!i n . , f°
Id there le iimeh rn.' ru h ,llllir »nl« a. would entitle the
.ret that It turi ■ 1 out that he had not ,(> ! ' R vti 11 verdict without proof
fen 'captured.™ There lei rewardof/ 0 : «»• »nwu>it claimed In the petition.
»:oo f..r the capture of Tripp.
Mr. J.IIIM Finn hue gone.to Savan-J^
V 7 V V V..OV IM.1,1 BO I c (P.|UIICU U IIIItJillK
delicto, when tho act complained of | that the plaintiff In error held himself
was not one which, under tho law, could; out to the payee of the promissory noto
be Justified, It la necessary, that'the de-1 sued on ns the partner of him who
P ro P er . Pl®wlinga admit not signed the alleged Arm name thereto.
and there was sufficient evidence that
the payee acted thereon In the transac
tion represented by such note, yet as
not be ascertained whether the
dlstr
Mr
N. Ainsworth and Mr. K. J.
are in Wrightavtlle attending
jal conference of the Dublin
Iilshop Candler Is presiding.
Edward D. Wade has been up-
postmaster at Mont
Mr. It. W. Wynne has returned from
a visit to Pulitnkl county.
Mins I/>la Bolomon Is visiting friends
at Moxley.
Mrs. T. O. Adamson of Banderavllle
la visiting In the city, guest of the
fumlly of Mr. W. C. Floyd.
Miss Mary Bolomon of Jeffersonville
Is visiting In the city, guest of Mr*.
W. D. Walker.
Mm. J. O. Ilyrnea la visiting Colston.
H. C.. guest of her daughter, Mrs. H. W.
Mrs. II. P. Davis, who has been visit
ing In the family of Col. J. M. Stubbs
for several months past, has returned
to her home at Port Huron, Mich.
Miss Maggie Harp of Cusseta is vis
iting in the city, guest of Mias Annie
Hello Matthews.
He
>WX IN WAYNE,
niUes to lie quite
July It.—It Is said
town Is to be built
>untjr, it being
trunswlck and
id from J?sup
land In
WAYCUOSB. Os
that quite a little
at Hnrtcnse In Wayne <
at the Junction of the
Birmingham and tho rc
to Fnlkstun. II. O. Middleton
Atkinson own about alt of tl
that section, and havo air*
me need business there. A gentleman
from that section says that Hartcnao
L'n county, hluh
and healthy, amt the people generally
am talking of building the new court
*hnt place, tie also saya that
ity linn between Pierce and
syne will be changed one of these
?*• ?,!L W ¥ >wa ago. between the
t and little Kitlliu rivers to the lower
iters of the Croat swamp.
i:ncoi\nti:uiji> nia rattle it.
the trial of an action brought to
recover damage* ngulnst a railroad
mpany for Injuries sustained by tho
running and oitcration of a train of
cars, it was error to charge In such
manner as to convey to the Jury the
impression that If they should believe
that both the company and the person
Injured were equally negligent the
plaintiff could recover.
4. In nn action Instituted by a widow
for tho homicide of her husband, caused
by the negligent operation of a train
of cors by a railroad company, evidence
going to show that the deceased, at the
time he was killed, left no estate or
property was Inadmissible.
Judgment reversed. All conour.
D, H. Pope, for plaintiff In error.
•40. Fisher et al vs. Graham. Before
Judge Huberts. Wilcox superior court.
Cobb, J.—Under the allegations In
the pleadings and the facts disclosed
at the hearing, the court did not abuse
lta discretion in granting an injunc<
tlon and appointing a receiver.
Judgment affirmed. AH concur.
Etdrldge Cults and Hal Law*>n, for
plaintiffs In error; William C. Worrill,
contra.
641. Wells et al vs. Coker Hanking
Company. Appeal. Practice.
Fish, J.—The mere fact that several
separate and distinct cases "arising un
der the same contract,** and Wing be
tween the same partb's. were "by agree
ment tried together" before the Judg*.
''presiding as Judge and Jury," did not
hava the effect of consolidating thee
case* Into one. »o as to authorise the
losing party, by a single bill of excep
tions. lo bring to thin court for review
th<
Id to Hr
With IIlu Hnttle
WAYORC
nUr
Infected
July
19.—Mr.
, . x — ^..ckley In
tbla county hod a severe fright a day
i’t twoMSgo by driving on to a big rat-
*lng the snake, he sprung
ok the hnrneaa from
verdict In favor of the plaintiff
rendered on tho proof of a general
partnership or because of such repre
sentations, it must, because of. the
error above pointed out. be set (isItSlo.
Judgment reversed. All concur.
Charles T. Hopkins and Daniel W.
Rountree, for plaintiff In error; Slaton
& Phillips, contra.
644. Woodsldo et Al. vs. Llppold et al.
Equitable petition. Before Judge
Lumpkin. Fulton superior court.
Fish. J.—Where a mortgagee, to
uvold the expense of a foreclosure, took
from the mortgagor. In settlement of
the debt secured by the mortgage, n
conveyance of the mortgaged property
at Its full valuation, retaining h!a mort
gage uncancclled. and subsequently
conveyed the property to u third per
son, at the same time delivering to
him. without any assignment thereof,
the mortgage still uncanrell»d; and
where the mortgagee afterward, at the
Instance and request of his grantee,
made an entry of satisfaction upon
his mortgage, and bad the same can
celed of record, both the mortgagee and
his grantee having at the time actual
notice qf nn Intervening mortgage, but
acting under, a misapprehension, for
which the holder of tho Intervening
mortgage was In no wise responsible,
that he would not Insist upon the en
forcement of the same, the lien of the
tlrst mortgage was extinguished, and
equity will not restore It to priority
over the Intervening mortgage.
Judgment affirmed. All concur.
Ellis A Ellis. Gray. Brown A Ran
dolph and C. W. Smith. for plaintiffs
In error; Charles A. Head, contra.
io in»« court tor review •. - —
Judgments severally rendered in 615. Wright vs. McCord. Before Judge
such casea in the court below. Lumpkin. Fulton superior court.
Writ of error dismissed. AH concur. Little, J.—1. One who. for the pur
lieu J. Conyers, for plalttffs In error; | pose of Inducing another to lend money
John L, Hopkins & Buna, contra, to a third person upon land ns security,
w ~ . , represents to the person from whom
642. Raleigh and Gasion Railroad Com-1 the lain la sought that the land of-
pany et al va. Bradshaw. Action for fered us security belongs to. the pro
damages. Before Judge Calhoun, posed borrower, and who thus procures
UiT c 2 ur ! i the loan to be made. Is. In a proceeding
h tan. J.—L Under the rule laid down: l*y the lender to subject the land to his
In liarrki vs. Central Railroad, Com-, debt, estopped from thereafter deny-
pany, 74 Ua. MS. when a petition against! Ing that title to the same was In the
two railroad companies charges that; borrower at the time the deed was exe-
| *-“• * cuted. and asserting that title was at
the time In himself.
2. Where under such circumstances
from his bugg;
the plaintiff's husband was killed on a
designated public crossing, by a pas
senger train of the defendants, in con
sequence of the negligence of the de
fendants In dlvem named particulars,
and amendment which alleges that,
"without reference to whether the de-
•ased wsa killed on or off the crossing.
the lender reduces hie claim to Judg
ment and rcconveys the land to the
borrower and causes It to be levied
upon. an | the ptrwu who so procured
. . ** roade Wes a claim, the
emptoyca failed to exercise ordi
nary care, failed to give warning, failed
to check or slow up. and thereby were
guilty of gross and wanton negligence."
docs not Introduce a new cause of ac-
WAYCROgS
SOS, mother t
Ware county,
the past fiftee
uly !».—Mrs. WII-
D. A. Wilson of
ia been blind for
' v -
*. Whet. «L Juror *», cxcuMd for
provlu.ntlal cauao. and one of tho par-
<lo* conaontKl that the trial rhoutd
: proceed before the rematutnt eleven
Jurora, auch party cannot complain
that, before in lkh:« auch conM-nt. the
court had overruled a motion for a ml.*
I 1 . ; rifht lo make auch complaint
not bavin* been rewrved.
L» A wltaeu cannot ba Impeached
toy proof of contradictory atatementa
without laytn* th. foundation for the
same, by callln* hi. attention "with
w much certainty aa pomtble to the
time, place, persons and
attending the former stai
rule Is not varied wh**rv
of the witness wws tak<
tlons. and the alleged
Judgment affirmed- All concur.
T- C. Battle and W. I. Heyward, for
Plaintiff in error; C. W. Smith and Ar-
mlniuB Wright, contra.
•e afte
•41 Board of trustees of the Gate City
Guard va city of Atlanta. Applica
tion for Injunction. Before Judge
Fite. Fulton superior court.
Cobb. J.—I. Public property, wltbln
the meaning of that clause of the con
stitution which authorizes the general
assembly to exempt from taxation "all
public property," embraces only such
property as is own«d by the state or
some political division thereof, and title
to which I# vested directly in the state
or one of Its subordinate political dt-
v fS n*. or in some p«T»on holding ex
clusively f ’r the ^neflt of the state
‘umstancea J °r a subordinate public corporation,
ent." This t It follow* from the ruling stated
testimony | In the preceding note that that portion
by depost - > of the act of the general assembly an-
Jlctory | proved October IS. 1SS5, and now em-
rd cind befo
btalted In the political cede, section
list, which declares that each armory
»ony la I "owned** and occupied by any command
trial. of the volunteer military forces of the
alt of I state "ritiaU be. to all intent* and pur-
nds of .public property. . . . * n ,j
ng spe- I ouch pabt'.-- prererty . , . ^
plained • xempt frem any taxation, state, eonn-
*■ urate, jty. or muni 'ipaL** is in violation of the
I have — tut. n. and therefore nu!l*aai
■u : y Judsment aS-rm-'
cone or.
James V. O'Neill, for plaintiff In er
ror; J. L. Mayeon and W. P. Hill, con
tra.
647. Johnson vs. StancllfT, receiver.
Equitable petition. Before Judge
Candler. DcKalb ruperior court.
Lumpkin, P. J,—1. An answer. In the
nature of a cross-bill, which sets up
matters of defense not germane to the
case made by the plaintiff’s petition, is
not maintainable.
2. In view of the pleadings filed In
the present case and of the facts dis
closed on the hearing thereof, the trial
Judge gave to it the proper direction.
Judgment affirmed. All concur.
Burton Smith, J, W. Moore and J.
D. Kilpatrick, for plaintiff in error;
King & Anderson, L. W. Thoma-9 and
W. W. Braswell, contra.
648. Almand et al. vs. Whitaker, ex
ecutor, et al. Petition for direction.
Before Judge Reagan. Uockdfte su
perior court.
Lumpkin. P. J.—-Under the general
rule of construction, a will whereby
property is given to the named "chil
dren" of A, to the named "heir**" of
B, and to C, with provision for un
"equal division," must, when there is
nothing to indlcato a contrary Inten
tion on the rart of the testator, be so
interpreted and carried into effect as
that the beneficiaries shall take per
capita and not per stripes.
Judgment reversed. All concur.
A. U\ McCnlla and J. It. Irwin, for
plaintiffs in error; G. W. Gleaton, con
tra.
649. Overstreet et aU .vs. Sullivan et
al. Equitable petition. Before Judge
Kvann. Screven superior court.
Lumpkin, P. J.—1. By a deed exe
cuted in PG4 realty was conveyed to a
hufibnnd "for the use, benefit, and ad
vantage in trust of (his wife) for life,
exempt from the marital rights of
(himself or any future husband), for
her sole and separate use, and on h*r
decoxiv? to such child or children as
she may have In life." Ueld: (a) Thut
the trurt for the life tenant was exe
cuted by the married woman’s law of
1866, or became executed a* soon aft6r
its enactment as the attained her ma
jority. (b) That no trust at aU was
created for the children of the life ten
ant .but that they took a** remainder
men a legal and not an equitable es
tate.
2. This care as presented la (controlled
by the ruling abovo announced; from
which If results that the Judgment ex
cepted to was erroneous.
Judgment reversed. All concur.
650. Belt et al. vs. Slmklnn et al. Ac
tion for damages. Before H. D. D.
Twiggs, Judge pro hac vice. Emanuel
superior curt
Cobb. J.—A tenant fr life who holds
the estate without Impeachment for
waste Is not liable at law* to a remain
derman for waste committed, though
he may be restrained by a court df
equity at the instance of a remainder
man from committing further acts of
waste In the future, which are destruc
tive of the Inheritance or of a wanton
And malicious nature.
Judgment affirmed. All concur.
It. L. Gamble, Alfred Herrington and
F. II. Snffold. for plaintiffs; Williams
& Williams, for defendants.
651. Georgia Railroad and Banking
Company va. Gardner. Equitable pe
tition. Before Judge Brinson. Rick
mond superior court.
Lewis, J.—1. The verdict was sus
tained by the teatlmonj*. The defend
ant in error having gone Into posses
slon of the land in dispute under a
deed, enclosed It by a fence, and held
the undisturbed possession of It for
. more than twenty years, he had a com-
Iplete prescriptive title, and, therefore,
' the right to resist the trespass of the
employes of the railroad company upon
the land thus held and occupied.
2. A defendant may amend an
answer by withdrawing an admission
therein made, and. after so doing, may
Introduce evidence tending to support
the allegations of auch answer as It
stands after the amendment has been
allowed.
Judgment Affirmed. A11 concur.
Joseph B. A Bryan Cummlng. for
plaintiff In error; William H. Fleming,
contra.
•52. Flnnott et at, executors, vs. Moor*
et al. and vice versa. Equitable peti
tion. Before Judge Brinson. Rich
mond superior couhL
Simmon*. C. J.—L Where th** law
permits the creation of a "spendthrift"
trust and a will or deed creates auch a
trust, the trust Is prima fade valid,
and the burden Is on the beneficiaries
to show that they are not within any
of the classes described In the statute
allowing such trusts to be created.
2. A trust of this character, created
in the state of Pennsylvania, whose
laws allow auch trusts. Is valid under
the laws of this state, provided the
beneficiaries are within any of the
class** for whom such trusts are per
mitted here.
g. Real or persona! property in this
state. deTlecd in a will made In Penn
sylvania to trustees for the benefit of
• * •» • *•- «•' - th v
wtn debit aa BtkMBWk Jiyy to the
tf*'*""•* :v f -r. y of
assdS In Ptnr;«vlvaniA to pay a 1 th-
det>:s of tLs citait, «***>- U-.c a * t,o
creditors of the estate resident In this
state.
A valid trust can be created In
this state for the benefit of a person
sul Juris, for life, with remainder over
In trust for another person sul Juris,
for life; and the fact that there Is an
ultimate remainder over to a third per
son, which la Invalid under the statute
forbidding, under certain conditions,
donations to charities, does not destroy
or execute the trusts created for the
benefit of the life tenants.
5. When a will creating such trusts
was made and produced in Pennsylva
nia, and upon proper proof was admit
ted to probate In this state, and nn ad
ministrator with the will annexed ap
pointed, and several suits were com
menced against him, and he filed nn
equitable petition for a construction of
the will and for direction ns to how to
administer the estate in this state, and
praying that the other suits be en
joined, and, at the Instance of one of
the suitors, a receiver was appointed
to tnke charge of nnd administer the
estate. If the property Is sold under a
proper order of court by the receiver, a
deed by the latter would convey a good
title to the purchaser upon Ills com
plying with the conditions of the sale.
6. The proceeds Of such a sale,
whether treated ns realty or ns person
alty. belong, under the will, to the
trustees.
7. In view of what Is above laid
down, there Is no merit In any of the
osslgnment* of error embraced In the
cross-bill of exceptions.
Judgment on main bill of exceptions
reversed; on cross-bill affirmed. All
concur.
William K. Miller, for the executors;
Frank II. Miller, J. C. C. Black. D. O.
Fogarty. E. H. Cnllawny, J. R. Lumar
und M. P. Carroll, contru.
Wofford and N. L. Hutchins, contra.
656. King Hardwnre Co. vs. Rowden.
Appeal. Before Judge Jones. Hab
ersham superior court.
Lumpkin, P. J —A bond filed for tho
purpore of entering an appeal , in be
half of a partnership or of a corpora
tion must on Its face show that tho
appellant's name was affixed thereto
by. some one duly authorized to do so;
and an offered amendment designed to
make complete an instrument In tho
form of an appeal bond, but defective
In the respect indicated, is properly re
jected if even after its allowance the
paper would still fall to meet the legal
requirements herein stated.
Judgment affirmed. All concur.
H. II. Dean and R. L. J. Smith, for
plaintiff in error; H. H. Perry" contra]
SEVEN YEARS IN BED,
Will wonders ever cease?’* Inquire
the friends of Mrs. L. Pease of Law
rence, Kan. They know she had been
unable to leave her bed In seven years
on account of kidney nnd liver trouble,
nervous prostration nnd general debil
ity. but "three bottles of Electric Bit
ters enabled me to walk,” she writes,
'and in three months I looked like a
new person." Women suffering from
headache, backache, nervousness, sleep
lessness. melancholy, fainting and diz
zy spells will find It * a priceless blesA
sing. Try It. Satisfaction Is guaran
teed by all druggists. Only 60c.
638. Savannah. Florida and Western
Railway Co. vb. Poital Telegrnph-
Cablo Co. Refusal of Injunction. Be
fore Judge Falllgant. Chatham su
perior court.
Cobb, J.—1. This court has no au
thority by mandamus to compel tho
Judge of the superior court to grant a
protective order In the nature of a pu-
persedea*. where he refuses an injunc
tion nnd declines to grant such order.
2. While a r«*coi>d application for an
Injunction may be made whore nn In
junction was refused on the first appli
cation, such second application is ad
dressed to the discretion of th** judge,
and should not as n general rule be
granted unless based upon grounds
which were unknown to the applicant
at the time of the first application,
and which could not, by the exercise
of ordinary diligence, have been dis
covered by him.
Application for mandamus denied,
and judgment affirmed. All concur/
Chisholm & Clay, for plaintiff In er
ror; Garrard & Meldrim, contra.
•54. Ray va Green et al. Equitable
petition. Before Judge Felton.
Crawford superior court.
8tmmone, C. J.—1. In a suit to estab
lish a lost deed, a quit-claim deed ex
ecuted at the same time to the ramc
land conveyed In the alleged lost deed,
to the same grantee, and attested by
the same witnesses, but executed by
a different grantor. Is irrelevant and
not admissible in evidence.
2. If a plaintiff falls to establish the
material allegations of his petition, or
if his testimony is contradictory and
uncertain as to such allegations, the
court, on motion to nonsuit, should
construe the evidence most strongly
against him, and may, if no other tes
timony appears, be authorised to grant
a nonsuit; but If the plaintiff Intro
duce other witnesses whose testimony
Is sufficient to establish the allegations
of the petition, it is error to grant a
nonsuit.
Judgment reversed. All concur.
Hall & Wimberly and L. D. Moore,
for plaintiff in error; Guerry & Hall,
Abbott, Cox & Abbott, and M. |
Bayne, contra.
•55. Scales, administrator, et ftL vs.
Chambers. Equitable petition. Be
fore Judge Russell. Banks superior
court. ,
Cobb, J.—l.When the Issue In con
troversy was whether a crier had
knocked off property without giving
persona at the sale fair and reasona
ble opportunity to bid. It wm compe
tent to ahow by one present that, but
for the premature termination of the
sale, he would have run the (property
up higher.
L A mere crier employed by an ad
ministrator doe* not control the safe,
but Is simply the mouthp'ece of the
and can not. over his protest,
complete the rale. Certainly not when
there are prerent one or more persons
willing to bt«l higher if allowed an op
portunity to do ft}.
i Applying to the fact* disclosed by
the record the rulings above announced,
tb-ourt erred In refusing to grant a
Judgment reversed. AH concur.
, F }}■ Johnson and H. H. Perry, for
plaintiffs In error; W. l Pike, A. P.
Barbecued pig with French
slaw for free lunch today at
W all Street Bar.
SEASHORE SPECIAL
To <‘Tyt»ce ny the Sen,”
Special train of elexant day coaches and
S arlor cars leave Maccn via Central of
eorgla Railway every Sunday until Au-
Kil!*t 25th ,4:<5 a. m.. arriving Savannah
10:S5 a. m.. Tybee 11:45 a. m.: returning
leave Tybee 5:06 p. m., Savannah 6:30 p.
m.. and arrive Macon 12:23 rnldnlgnt.
Round trip ticket* good on special trains
from Macon 42.00; proportionate rate from
Intermediate points. No baggago checked
on these tickets.
Improved hotel facilities. New pavilion.
Surf, bathing. Boating and fishing. An
Idenr outing.
For further Information apply to
J. M. MALLORY. Trav. Pass. Agt.,
JNO. W. BLOUNT. Pass. Agent,
E. P. BONNER. No. (11 Fourth St.
Union Ticket Agent.
Schedule Effective July 1st, 1901,
Tralnft arrive at and depart from Un
Station, corner Fourth and Plum stre
Leave Ari
Macon. (90th Meridian Tlme.J Mac
I Savannah, Mlllen, Au- i
.. gust* and Intermediate
*12 50am\ points ]• j j*
jTvbee SeaslioVe special.
. . .. | Savannah and Tybee,
t 4 45am 1 Sundays only Jr' 2£
I Savannah, Mlllen, Au-1
cuatv. Mlllo.igovllle, I
Eatonton, Covington, (
and Intermediate points j
S- via Gordon - -
MHledgeviUe, isatoatan
and Intermediate points
vU Gordon
Atbros, Madison, Mon.
Uceilo and Intermediate
pelwU
* 4 50pm
* 7 40pm
*11 Mam
Atlanta. Griffin. Uarnes-.'ii"
vlllt, Rome, Chatta i* 7
nooga and Intermediate
■ patau In
ri r , m ,P.* ham *.. Co,UmD u* i
and Intermediate points f
also Montgomery via ]• 4
Americus, ttaittnviite. Al-t
bany, ArUngton, Dothan,I
Hartford. Eufaula. Pn-I
I Ion Springs. Mont- I
com P ry .. .* Rd lnt «r- j*i2
..... mediate points (• 3
Albany, Americus and,
.. Intermediate point* .. *7
Columbia. Beltersviiie. [
and intermediate points V *
su.^’iV o'inr!" D- " !y " cept 8uno ' iy -
_ ca»? on night trains. Pi
cars on day trains, between Macon
Savannah and Macon and a»1;
S.R'* OR Tybee Seashore gp<
Through sleepers between Savannah
Birmingham via Macon and Colun
Direct connection Is mode at Btrmina
for Memohts. Kansas City and all o!
and Northwest. Pullman Dra
Room sleeping cars between Macon
lanta. Chattanooga. Nashville %nfi
Louts via Martin on train leaving m
at 4:15 a. m. and arriving Macon
Connection Is made at Savannah
the magnificent steamship' of the o
Fteamibtp Company and Merchants*
Miners* Transportation Company for
phi?* Bo0ton ' Baltimore and Phil
^For detailed Information, rates, ■<
J Sf. >fA Vi. ORY. Trav, Para. Art
JNO. W. BLOt’.NT. Pas' Aft.. *
til Fourth
E. P. BONNER. Us!oa T.rV-t Agr
Macon, <
3 r TT*t 7 .Y '"Jrv.r lW A,
E . v,. .
TIU.U. Li. KLU.NB. S ,-. r ....