Newspaper Page Text
10 Lv Macon Arm 10 10 13
6* Mr I.lz-lla LvIlO 21! 9 cl
37 Lv.... Culloden ....Lv 9 39; 8 i3
Sl|Lr.... Yatenvlllo ....Lv! 9 21! S l»
90. Lv... ThomaRtcn ...Lv 8 55! 8 2".
00{Ar.... Woodbury ,...Lt1 8 10; 7 33
( Southern Railway. |
M Ar... W. Springs ...Lv 7 BO 7 80
^ • A *• V ■ ■ M1 v ■ ■ a T m A vJ
G. G. Coffy.
UNITED STATUS MARSHAL'S SALE.
In the District Court of the United States
for the Western Division of the South
ern District of Georgia.
By virtue of an order of sale Issued out
of the district court of the United States
for the Western Division of the Southern
District of Georgia, dated July K>. MO.
notice la hereby given that I will sell by
public auction to the highest bidder, on
July 92. mu. at IS m.. before the door
of the store bouse occupied by E. D. Ans-
ley. at No. 41S Jackson street. America*.
Georgia, the following property celled
by m»* as the property or E. D. Ansley.
bankrupt, to-wit:
One stock of fancy groceries, to be
divided Into lots or parcels and offered
separately, and then to be-offered * n hulk,
atvl the higher of these bids accepted,
•ubject to conditions stated below. One
horse and two delivery wagons, one set
of single harness and atom fixtures in
store-house of said bankrupt,
i The conditions of said sale shall be the
7 «MAr.
1 SOiLv.
annot
..... 7JWLv...... Harris ...... A r 7SM....,
..... I lfrAr.... LeGra*:ie_.„.Lv 7o®|.....
Nos. U and 31. Sundays; Noe.~3i and
3L dally.
Nos. 21 and 22 connect at Macon with
Central of Georgia Railway to and from
Savannah and Southwestern Georgia, and
with the Georgia Southern and Florida
Railway; at TateavlUe with Southern
Railway for points south of Yatesvilte;
at MGrange with Atlanta and West
Point Railroad for points north of U>>
Grange.
Not a and M .WarniBprin*. Limits,
stop only at Lfsella. Morans Culloden.
YatesYfile. Tbomaston. Crest and Wood
bury. running through solid to Warm
Spring*.
Train * arrive and depart from rr-r
of Fifth and Pina streets, Xseam *?a
JULIAN H. LA NR, Gen. Man.
M R. MEADOWS. f> n . A*t
TH - H. FREEMAN. C. T A, Hotel
Lanier.
J. a aTREYKK r Agl
To •TyLcc II;
Sr*' I «! tr I cf *-'• -
arlor cers leare Mb
leonri* Railway ever
ust 22th .4:* a. m..
i»:JS a. m.. Tybee 11:
arrtvl
i facilities. New p
Boating and fishli
*dlately upon s
i Arm at Ion of u
balance upon
urt. will forfcl
THE MACON TELEGRAPH; WEDNESDAY MORNING, JULY 24, 1901
Supreme Court of Georgia
Continue! Fran I’nttr Threo
1. Proof that tltl. to th» property
Ievl.il on >vaa at the date o! tlie levy In
a peraon other than the defendant fu
execution, and that the claimant :
qulred this alnce the tiling of the claim
•will not authorize a verdict to M* fa
vor.
Judgment reveraed. All concur.
J. C. JtdwaBa and H. T, Perkina, for
plaintiff In error: Hubert BEatea am:
Robert McMillan, contra. ,
741. Johnaon et al. vi. Gilmer, eberlfT.
Injunction. Before Judge Kate,. Hall
auperlor court.
Cobb, J.—1. The extraordinary equi
table remedy of Injunction doe* not lie
In favor of one who haa a,complete arm
adequate remedy at law.
2. A court of equity will not by In*
junction prevent the mleapproprlatlo*.
by officers of another court of fumia
collected from fines nnd forfeitures and
due another officer of such court. Th
remedy of the party aggrieved Is hy
application to the Judge of that court
to have the fund properly applied,
Judgment reversed. All concur.
Hubert Estes and II. H. Perry, for
plaintiffs In error; W. A. Charters and
H. II. Dean, contra.
742. Walker va. State. Before Judge
Crisp. City court of Amerlcua.
Bumpkin, P. J.-There wue ample ov-
Idenco to warrant the verdict, nnd con
sequently no error In denying a mo.
tlon for a new trial based on the gem
oral grounds.
Judgment affirmed. All concur.
741. Clarke et nl. vs. Wheatley, recit
er. Equitable peTltlnn. Before Judge
Reagan. Sumter superior court.
Bumpkin. P. J.—t. It Is not the right
of n stranger to a pending case to In
tervene therein, unless It Is ne
to his protection that h» l>e allowed tq
he-nine a party to the litigation and
thus afforded at opportunity to rtsUt
the rendition of a Judgment whlct
would operate to his prejudice.
2. On.. Who, though acting In entlr
goo,I faith. Illegally disposes of prop
e.ty belonging to another |,i liable
account therefor: and If under any c|r.
circumstances he has an equitable right
to demand that his unauthorised dispo
sition of such properly be ratified, he
must st least fnake a proper tender
of the proceeds arising therefrom, and
assume thu burden of showing that
the value ot the property was, not
greater than the amount reallitc
therefor.
3. Th# decree entered by the court
in the pr**«ont. eato being more favor-
ab,f th « lowing party than he hn.r
«ny right to expect, It afford# him nd
Juat caune for complaint.
Judgment affirmed. All concur.
W. I. Clarke, W. M. Hnwkos, and
Bacon. Miller A Brunson, for plnlntirr
in error. Allen Fort otid W. P. Wallis
conlrn. " ’
dent to sustain the verdict; and the
discretion of the trial j Mi;o in refusing
o grant a new trial ill not be con-1
trolled.
Judgment affirmed. All concur.
C. D. Maddox, for fdalnllff; Rosser
& Carter, for defendant.
746. Ray vs. state. Before Judge Par
ker. City court of Baxley.
Fish, J.—Upon the trial of one charged
with the offense of using profane lan
guage, without provocation. In the pres
ence of a female, the accused may de
fend by showing that he was provoked
to use the language by one other than
such female, the sufficiency of the pro
vocation being a question foe the Jury
under all the circumstances of tho cat
Judgment reversed. AH concur.
E. P. Padgett & Son, for plaintiff In
error: J. II. Thomas, solicitor, contra.
747. Holmes vs. State. Before Judge
Felton. Bibb superior court.
Bumpkin, P. J—Tho charges except
ed to embraced famlllnr ond welt setl-
tled rules of law, all of which were, in
view of the testimony adduced at tho
trial, appropriate and applicable. No
error of law was committed, and tho
evidence, while warranting the verdict
of Involuntary manslaughter which tho
Jury returned, was sufficient to sua-
taln a conviction of a higher offense.
It follows that the overruling of th*
motion fqr a new trial affords th<
plaintiff In error no Just cause of coin'
plaint.
Judgment affirmed. All concur. (
John It. Cooper, for plaintiff In er
ror; William Brunson, solicitor-gener
al, contra.
748. Vince vs. State. Before Judge Ad
ams. City court of Dublin.
Bumpkin, P. J.—Merely refuslng.upon
te demand of a levying officer, to un
lock a door of a house In order to en
able him to enter the same for the pur
pose of levying a luwtul process upon
goods therein contained Is not a Vlbla
tlon of section 306 of the Penal Code,
which mokes It a misdemeanor
"knowingly and willfully obstruct, re
slst or oppose any offeer ot the state, or
other peraon duly authorised, In serv
ing or attempting to servo or execute
any lawful process or order." .
Judgment reversed. All concur.
Akerman & Akorman, for plaintiff lit
error, F. O. Corker, solicitor, contra
A TEXAS WONDER.
5 VERY*
3 Great-DI«-
nd ' bladder
gravel, cure? dla-
emisflfjn#, weak and
:umutism and all Irreg-
kldneya arid bladder in
women, regulate# blad-
chlldren. If not fold by
will be «ent by mail on
(ALL'S Gil RAT I>IS<
• small bottle of Hall'
covery cure.* all kidney :
troul s, remove# gravel,
betes, seminal emission*
lame back-*, rl
ularftles of th*
both men and
der trouble# in
your druggist,
receipt of $7. One email bottle la two
months' treatment, and will cure any
case above mentioned. Dr. E. W. Hall,
sole manufacturer, P. O. Box 629, St.
Louie. Mo. Send for testimonials. Sold
by all druggist*, and II. J. Lamar &
Son*, Macon* Ca.
HEAD THIS.
MARTIN. Tenn.. June 5, 1901.
Dr. E. -W. Hall, St. Louie, Mo.—My
Dear Sir: I take pleasure in saying
that I have used your Hall’# Wonder
with much benefit, having suffered for
year# with kidney trouble, and most
heartily recommend it to all sufferer#
from kidney diseases. Respectfully,
J. W. LOWRANCE,
Member of the Mephi# Annual Confer
ence, M. E. Church, South.
WAYMAN COTTON
MILL CASE ENDS
for a given time a# rent if the house#
had been occupied is competent proof
of #uch value.
4. Where In such a case damage to
houses on the lot* 1# #hown a# an ele
ment of recovery, and It appears that
this damage was occasioned, not only
by the action of the water confined on
the lot, but also by natural d*cay not
Incident thereto, and by trespasser# a#
well, and the amount of damage sus
tained by the action of the water alone
is not clearly Indicated by the evi
dence, such proof of damage without
more doe# not afford a legal basis for
recovery.
Judgrhent reversed. All concur.
Mlnt*r Wimberly,for plaintiff In er
ror; Hardeman, Davis, Turner & Jones,
contra.
f44. Kline vs. Russell, nofore Judge
Lumpkin. Fulton superior court.
Cobb, J.—1. Where a Uobtor claimed
that a sum which his crodltur wai
keeking to reach by a process of gar
uiMliment was duo to him aa a lubor
and therefore not subject to such pro
11 not, upon th*? trial ot at
IhHuo thus arising, erroneous to charge
If thu contract of employment con
template* that the clerk's service
wrjt to consist mainly of work re
(lulling mental *kill or business cu
parity, and Involving the exercise of
hi* Intellectual faculties, rather than
work th# doing of which properly
would depend upon a mere physical
power to perform ordinary manual In
bor, ho would not bo. a 'laborer.' If, on
the other hand, the work which the con
tract required tho clerk to do was, li
the main, to be the performance of such
labor a# that lant above Indicated, h
u*>uld bo a 'laborer.' Oliver va. Macon
Hard wan* Co., 98 (la. 949.
3. According to the rule laid down In
the case cited, and In vlow of tho evi
dence appearing In the record, the
plaintiff In error was not a laborer
whose wage# were exempt from the
process of garnishment. 8ec Kneel vs,
Adler, 1flu. 328; Rtuart va. Poole,
749. Spark#, receiver, vs. Georgia
Southern and Florida Hallway Com-
x pony. Before Judge Felton. Bibb
auperlor court.
Little, J.—l. Leaving out of consid
eration u 11 question# a# to the state of
account# between the parties, It result#
a# a matter of law, from the terms of
the various order* and dqcree* of the
court disposing of the assets of the
compnry of which the plaintiff In er
ror was receiver, that tho title to the
claim against th# defendant in error,
upon which hi# cross-net Ion was based,
had, before tho Institution of the pres
ent action ngalnst him, passed to the
purchasers of the property, franchises,
etc., of the company first above indi
cated, otid accordingly that such cross
action wus not maintainable. And tho
cross-action was not maintainable for
the further reuson that such receiver
had not in duo time filed a notice of
this claim, as required by tlie court's
decree.
lie rulings of the court, which
are conclusive of tho issues Involved,
upheld us correct,
Tho m uter of charging the costs
meh a cnee ns this. It being an In
tervention In an equitable proceeding.
Is one largely In the discretion of the
trial Judge; and therefore there was,
In passing the order directing tho coats
accruing In this case to be paid from
tho funda In tho hands of the commis
sioner. no abuse of tho discretion with
which that officer was Invested.
Judgment affirmed. All concur.
Guerry & Hall, for plaintiff In error
llall A Wimberly, contra.
X The preceding notes deal with the
only question# presented In the motion
for a, now trial, In no far aa th** grounds
thereof are verified by the trial court.
Judgment Affirmed. All concur.
O. W. itrook*. for plaintiff In error;
It. J. II ut. « k. contra.
rm*by Company v». Hhewmnkt
phy. Attachment. Before Judgp
ipkln. Fulton superior court.
!>. J.—l. When under a contract
9 the articles which are the sub
matter of sale are to be
?lual receipt
irehaser of the articles will not
le him from refusing to accept
in the ground that they are not
quality stipulated tor In the con-
whent an Inspection and ekatn-
7B0. Bruhl vs. Coleman et al. Case
Before Judge Kvans. Emanuel supe
rlor court.
Fish, J.—Where one had given a gen
•rtl order to an express company that
all matter addressed to him should be
delivered by It to the conductor of i
named rjrtlroad, and, In a particular in
stance, a package of goods which had
been received by the conductor from the
express company under such order was
tendered by an agent of the railroad
company to the peraon who had given
the order, and he declined to receive
it because It was not Intended for him
and was not hla pmperty.nnd the agent
of the railroad company thereupon de<
llvercd the goode to an Impostor wh-.
pretended to be the rightful consignee,
nnd loss to the consignor was thus oc
casioned, both the person giving the
order nn.J the railroad company becnnii
liable to th»* consignor for the value
of the goods; and this Is so though the
Imposter exhibited to the agent of the
I railroad company, before the L
wrere^ delivered, some evidence tending
w that the goods were really In
tnallon of »uch art
refusal to adopt the
by a tender of the
within a reasonabl
are received. 6
netfa 7th Am.
7W; Clark. Con.
logg. 44 111. HA
BenJ.
tended for hlr
Judgment reveraed. All concur, «
rept I.lttl*\ J., who dlaaenta a# to I
liability of the person wh<9 gave the .
comp.nlcU I df . r , **Pr*«* company.
. I* maj.- “• C - Kill, nnd
liter ttaf T*"- for P(»* n *l*T: Fuffold
Mitchell, contra.
142; Dtveray va. Kel
l. c. 99 Am. Dec. 134.
t. In s ease of the character abov*
referred to, the fact that some ot th*
articles (a very small part ot the whole |
number were loet or stolen from the j
purchaser without negligence on hla I
part, or Inadvertently Add by him be-1
fore It was discovered that the articles
Were not of the quality required by the I
Contract of sale, v would not alone In
terfere with his right to refuse to ac
cept the balance; the purchaser helm
chargeable with the market value o
•uch of the articles so were not offer*
to be returned for the reasons abov
mentioned.
S. The verdict of the Jury sufftclentl
covered the issues made In the ptraO
Inge, and, when construed In the llgt
thereof, la capable ot exact enforce
menL
4. A new trial will not be granted be
cause a verdict In favor of the defend
ant, in a case where several pleas an
filed, does not tpedfy ui*on which pl«
It Is found, when there was no request
to Instruct the Jury to met frame the
verdict, and no objection waa nude to
th* verdict on this ground when the
same was *vndi r**d. Ventresv Ros
ter, 78 Qa. 334; Little vs. Rogers, 99 Ga.
on va
'51.—Mayor and Council of Ma
Dannenberg. Action for d«
Judge Nott'ngham. City Court
Betor
of M
Af,um *«g lhat the city
xaa liable to respond In damages ■
Lh# plaintiff because of negligence
permitting a drain or culvert, pla
leroe# the street for the purpose
Blowing the surface-water to flow fre
hla lot, to become obstructed, the
which may be recovered are only
ed by vt
<3 of the wa
752.—Tindall v*. NIebet, clerk. Rule
for contempt. Before Judge Candler.
Tindall vs. Westcott, sheriff. Habeas
corpus. Before Judge Lumpkin. Bibb
Superior Court.
Little, J.—l. A person who has, by
the order of a court of competent Ju
risdiction, been appointed receiver of
Hi property of nn Insolvent debtor, be
comes an executive officer of the court
hich appointed him, and the property
received by him, or the money arising
from It# sale, In In curtodla legis.
If a receiver has been directed by
the court to deposit a fund arising from
the pale of the property of the debtor,
banks, subject to be withdrawn only
his check when the same has been
countersigned by tho Judge presiding in
the court which appointed him, and in
violation of his duty, and In dlrregard
the order of the court, the receiver
obtain# such fund from the bunks on
checks not countersigned, and appro
priates the mm# to hia own use, then,
regardless of the question whether or
not the bank Is liable for such wrong
ful payment,, such receiver Is in direct
contempt of the court whoso officer he
und he may be attached and punish
for contempt In disregarding the
of the court, nnd also for a fail
uro or refusal, when so ordered, to pay
Into court the fund so misappropriated.
creditor prhxm facie entitled to par
ticipate in the fund so withheld Is
proper party to move an attachment
against the defaulting receiver; and. in
the absence' of any such motion, tho
Sge prodding, on Information deriv
ed from any source, should cause prop
inquiry to be made as to the facts,
nnd, If found to bo true, take proper
stepa to compel the return of the
money.
X The high degree of care proper to
xereined in the preservation of
funds arising from the selxure of tho
property of a cttlsen requires that a
•celver entrusted with such' ttf'tund
should be held to a rigid accountublll
ty; nnd If, on proper order, he falls
or refuses to deliver the same. It is the
duty of the court to compel him to do
by the use of all lawful means, and
to that end It Is not illegal to adjudge
him .to bo In contempt for $uch failure,
nnd Imprison him, nor to continue such
Imprisonment for the? continuing con
tempt In refusing to deliver the money,
for auch a tlrpe at may be necessary
to compel Its production.
(a) After.he has been adjudged in
contempt and Imprisoned for a refusal
to deliver the fund, ho will not be die-
charged under a writ of habeas corpus,
sued out before another Judge, on the
ground that he la unable by reason of
his poverty to comply with such order,
but It rests In the sound legal dlscre
tlon of the Judge who committed him
to determine whether it is or is not in
the power of the receiver to restore
the fund.,
(b) Whether a receiver Is or Is not
unable, by proper effort, to restore a
fond entrusted to his keeping os nn
officer of tho court, ond which he ha#
wilfully misappropriated, Is, both at
common law and under our statute, a
question which may be determined by
presiding Judge, and Is not one
which la required to be submitted to a
Jurv.
4. The receiver In effect having ad
mitted a misappropriation of tho fund
committed to his safekeeping, was. In
any event, in contempt, and, without
regard to the fact of the disqualifica
tion of the presiding Judge who passed
the order requiring him to pay the fund
Into court, was subject to be held
therefor by the Judge who heard the
case. Under the facts of this case
shown hy the record, the receiver will
not be heard to urge such disqualifies
tlon.
Judgment In each case affirmed. All
concur.
John P. Ross, for plaintiff in error;
N. E. Harris, C. P. 8teed, Anderson &
Grace, O. J. Wimberly and John I.
Hall, contra.
Abundantly euffi-
thereof by pe
property.
<b). Even If
permitting th
culvert to be
carry sway 1
the owner le i
the doty of t
his property a
and the eons*
FORSYTH, Ga., July 23.—Messrs.
Persons & Persons have returned from
Atlanta, where they have been engaged
in aiding to secure a settlement of the
famous Wayman cotton mill case.
The settlement baa been reduced to
writing and filed in the office .of the
clerk of the superior court of Upson
county. The terms of the settlement
are substantially that J. H. Huddleston
and John H. Andrews of this cltif are to
own one-half Interest in the mill and
the old stockholders the remaining
half. . The old stockholders paid 37,500
to perfect this arrangement. The mill
will be taken out of the hands of the
receiver, and Mr. J.. H. Huddleston
will assume the active management.
The largest creditor, the Bonded
Warehouse Company, who held claims
to the amount of some 320,000, have
been paid all but about 33.000. The
other creditors will be paid as soon as
some minor arrangements can be com
pleted. The mill will soon be out of
debt, and as soon as the receiver Is re
lieved of his duties and the owners
take charge, the credit of the mill will
be restored.
All the cases pending in the state and
federal courts will be dismissed. Judge
Speer has been seen and has consented
for this settlement to be made. Ah soon
as Judge Reagan, who Is now out of
the Flint circuit, returns, he will be
asked to sign an order relieving his
receiver and turning the mill's affairs
over to the owners.
While Mr. Huddleston will go to Way-
manvllle to manage the mill, his fam
ily will remain In Forsyth.
“WHOCANCUREME?”
A Vital Question Which is
Frequently Asked by
Those Who Suffer
With aChronic
Disease.
A great nytriy of my patients have been
treated by some of the most prominent
physicians, and nfn'e times out of ten I
find that such cases are misunderstood.
This *ls not strange when it Is remembered
that chronic diseases are often very com
plicated. and it requires years of the most
constant study and research to acquire
the knowledge necessary to treat them in
telligently.
Th1.- is Acknowledged to be the age of
specialism, and there-is a constant de
mand for the best in every profession.
Especially is this true of the science of
medicine, and so broad is its scope that
no one man can master-al) Of Its branches.
The general practitioner finds that his
entire time Is taken up in the treatment
LAURENS SUPERIOR COURT.
GEORG
^ tfYea
Schedule Effective July 1st, 3901.
annah, Mlllen, Au- |
la and Intermediate |
points i* 3 &am
Tybee 8eashore special, I
Savannah and Tybee,
Sundays only Itl2 25am
Savannah. Mfiien, Au- I
custa. . MI Hedge villa. )
Eat on ton. Covington, I
and intermediate points J
via Gordon i* 3 48pm
Milled Seville,
Jjatonton I
and in tinned late points |
viH G'jrd.in It 1 43am
j Athens, m u$ti m. Mon* I
I ticello and intermediate I
I loom) poinu I* 7 15pm
i*n;
| JJlrrn tign mi. i r-iuim-iia i
1 and Intermediate points f
' 3 E2am[ also Montgomery Via j* 4 Ojprp
1100aml...'..... Columbus I* 12 f>ir*
DR. HATHAWAY.
of acuto lllnezs. so that when he is called
upon to treat chronic diseases, his knowl
edge of them is so limited that he is often
puzzled as to how to treat them prop-
erlv. '
My superior ability in treating diseases
■ ... . ..rllRgton, JP
Hartford. Eufaula. Un-f
lap Springs, Mont- 1
gomery and inter- M2 (On:
•11 g>am| mediate points i* 3 55p:
(Albany. Americus andi
» 7 4Qpm|.. intermediate points ..[• 7 40am
'j Columbia, SollersvTlle, l
►11 nr.nml nnd intermediate points |* 3 55pm
There Are Eleven Capital Cane
lie Tried—Personal Mention
DUBLIN, Ga., July 28.—Judge John
C. Hart convened the July term of the
superior court of Laurens county yes
terday. HI# charge to the grand Jury
was a very strong one litid was very
favorably commented upon. Acting on
the recommendation of the Dublin Bar
Association, Judge Hart will try only
criminal cas*s at this term of the
court and such civil cases cs can be
disposed of without the intervention
of a Jury.
Tho first case called yesterday
that of J. J. Webb, Jack Haskins and
Frank Davis, three white men.
ure charged with W. H. Fordham with
the murder of Oscar Cannon, July 4,
last? Fordham was tried at the July
term, 1900. of the court and Is now
serving a life term in the penitentiary.
Most of yesterday afternoon was taken
striking a Jury for the case.
Counsel for the defense wanted a _
ponement of tho case, but Juufe Hart
would,not grant It.
Altogether there are eleven capital
cases to bo tried at this term of the
court, the others being ns follows:
John Robinson, murder nnd assault;
Jack Graham nnd Dink Fish, arson:
J. L. Graham, murder; Joe Coats, mur
der; Charles Perry, murder; Will Hug
gins, assault; John Snell, murder.
Dr. C. L. Chapman ond Mr. Joseph
B. Daniel spent Sunday last In Dan
ville.
Mr. B. H. Rawls has returned from
a visit to the mountains of north Geor
gia.
Miss Blanche Ridley of Knoxville, I
i Tenn., Is visiting In the city.
Misses Louise und Maude Fisher have J
returned from a visit to Eastman.
Mr. W. Z. Kemp nnd wife have re
turned from a visit to Sylvanla.
Dr. Ernest II. Rawls of Savannah
spend Sunday and yesterday In the |
city, guest ot his parents, Mr. and Mrs.
B. II. Rawls.
Mcsdames M. Nicholson of Attapul-
gus and J. O. Curry of Quincey. Fla.,
are visiting In the city, guests of the
family of Rev. W. N. Ainsworth.
Miss Claudia Prescott has returned
from Balnbrldge.
Mrs. T. D. Smith Is visiting her son,
Capt. It. L. Smith, at Sylvanla.
of this kind is the result of years of con
stant study, during which time 1 have
devoted myself exclusively to my special
ty. T have treated more cases of chronic
diseases than any other physician m tho
United States. My wide experience hns
given me a perfect knowledge of every
form of chronic disease, and niy magnifi
cent record of cures proves my ability be
yond question. . . . .
I have? limited my specialty to the treat
ment of Loss of Manly Vigor. Stricture,
Varicocele, Blood and.Skin Dlsesases, Iv.d-
ney and Bladder Complaints, Femalo
Weaknesses, etc., and any one afflicted
with any of the above diseases Is given a
cordial Invitation to Investigate my origi
nal succes* ful methods of treatment. Each
case Is given my careful attention, nnd
a close study is made of its every detail,
and my treatment Is specially prepared
to meet every requirement.
You Can be Cured at Home.
If you cannot see me in person, you aro
invlttd to write mo a full description of
your case and learn nil about my perfect
system of home treatment by which I am
enabled to cure you nt your own home.
Consultation Tree either at office-or by
mail; correspondent confidential.
J. NEWTON HATHAWAY, M. D.,
Suite 39, Inman Bldg., 22tf S. Broad St.,
Atlanta. Ga.
-pally.
~nday
Sleeping cars on night trains. Parlor
cars on day trains between Macon and
Savannah and Macon and Atlanta,
nnd on Tybee Seashore Special.
Through sleepers between Savannah and
Birmingham via Macon^ and_ Columbus.
fit:
Pullman Drawing
Room sleeping cars between Macon. At*
lanta, Chattanooga. Nashville nnd St.
Connection Is made at Savannah with
the magnificent steamships of tho Ocean
Steamship Company and Merchants’ and
Miners' Transportation Company for New
411 Fourth St. '
E. P. BONNER, Union Ticket Agent,
Macon, Ga.
J. C. HATLK. General Passenger Agent,
E. H. HINTON. Traffic Manager.
THEO. D. KLINE, Gen. Superintendent,
i , i ,,i Savannah, Ga.
THE GEORGIA PINE RAILWAY CO.
OF GEORGIA.
“ThroiintccuLii River Route.”
Schedule Effective April 28. 1901.
Northbound. , Southbound.
8S~! n~H Stations.- '( 2 | 1 f 36*
A M|A M'P MlAr. .. Lv
10 15110 001 4 45(. Arlington .
10 00} 9 50 4 33' . Rowena ..
9 3V 9 30' 4 IS!. Damascus .
8 501 9 23! 4 05 “
8 35) 9 141 3 Ki
8 101 9 001 3 40
WHITE MAN TURNED YELLOW.
Groat consternation was felt by the
friends of M a H :arty of Lexing
ton, Kjr., when they saw he was turn
ing yellow. Ills skin changed color,
nlso his eyes, and he suffered terribly.
Ills malady was yellow Jaundice. lie
was treated by tho best doctors, but
without benefit. Then he was advised
to try Electric Bitters, the wonderful
stomach and liver remedy, and he
writes: ‘‘After taking two bottles I
wa# wholly cured.” A trial prove# Its
matchless merit for all stomach, liver
and kidney troubles. Only 50c. Sold by
all druggists.
II SUMMER 1
§ HORSE «
S GOODS j!
” Such ns Sliccln, Coolers
%y Ear Net#, Body Nets, lint#, ||
Q
\\
8 SORE BACK PAD 8
o In n boon for ltorscN with O
/| sore or tender buck*.
8 ,,r,cc 7r ’ e * n '” «
§S. S. PARMELEE, 8
o VEHICLE**. HARNESS, ETC. o
O MACON. GA.
11 U*J O 03 1 w-»
.. Ml ■ 11 121 5 47] 1 50
.... Boykin ....11 27| 5 50 2 33
. Eldorondo .111 401 r, 0Q| 2 2D
.... Lynne .... 11 52 fi 22 3 35
W. Bntnbr*gc'l2 OR R 35 3 50
Balnbrldge .(12 in 0 401 4 00
iV. AriP MIP MlP M
35 and 2
R. B. COLEMAN, Gen. Supt.
... Cordele Lv|
(Via O. & A.>__
Lv....... Cordele .r.....|Ar i BfpS
Wm.. Fitzgerald Lv| 7 03ai
Ar.„... Savannah Lv| 7 25at
Ar...... Americus ......L?
Ar Columbus L
Ar.... Montgomery ,...L
Ar.... Birmingham ....Lv
Ar.... Birmingham ...,Lv 4 03pm
Ar Mobile Lv 12 20ngt
Ar.... New Orleans ,...Lv 7 40pm
(Via So. Ry.)
J2”55ngt|Lv Macon ........Ar( 3 OCam
3 20am Ar Helena Lv 11 55pm
5 34am Ar....... Collins Lv 10 25pm
J 32pm|Ar Savannah Lv| 3 00pm
""Close connections made at Savannah
with steamer lines for Baltimore, New
York and Boston and all junction
points with linos conerglng.
Immediate connections at Montgomery
with Loulrvllle end Ohio for all point*
West, North and Southwest.
A. POPE, Gen. Pass. Agt.
General Offices: Savannah. Ga.
753. Conwell & Neal vs. Andrew. Com
plaint. Before* Judge Proffit. City
court of Elberton.
Tzcwts. J.—There being sufftclcent
donee to eue'aln the verdict. fin<1
material error of law having been <
mltted. the supreme court will not In
terfere with the discretion of the trial
JuTse In overruling th# m-'tlon fot
rear trial, the charge he gave the J
fully and fairly covering the material
t,su*« Involved.
Judement affirmed. All concur.
Z. B. Rover* and Rogers .t Rover
for plaintiffs In error; Joseph N. Wor*
lev, contra.
on hand, the partnership was bound b7
the contract so made, although tho
ther partner# sold these goods to other
purchaser# before receiving the order
of the first partner, and although the
latter sold the goods for less than their
market value. Civil Code, section 26M.
2. Evidence as to conversations be<
tween the seller and buyer, prior to the
making of the written contract, were
Inadmissible to show the terms of the
contract or the understanding of the
parties In reference thereto.
3. Limitations on the authority of a
partner to bind the partnership cannot
affect third persons who have no notice
of such limitations.
4. Where the contract Is for the sale
of “about” 147 dox«*n pairs of pants,
with nothing by which the particular
goods sold may be Identified, the con
tract Is to sell the amount named, with
euch accidental variation# a# may arise
from flight and unimportant exc*****
or deficiencies. Brawley va. United
Stat***. 98 U. S. 16$; 1 Am. & Eng. Enc.
U. 199. and note*.
Judgment reversed. All concur.
J. K. McClelland and Rogers A Rog
ers, f<»r plaintiff In error; Joseph N.
Worley, c r.tra.
If Your Eyes
Trouble You
Remember, IMMEDIATE RE
LIEF tnvaits them IIERE—
that PERMANENT relief, so
seldom experienced.
Yon owo yonr eyes proper
care. It's your first duty to
tho foremost blessing of na
ture to have them examined
by a competent optician. Wo
are thoroughly competent nnd
slinll gladly tell you wlmt tho
trouble is, and tho remedy.
Examinations Free.—^
Through Pullman cars between Macon
and New York.
Fff. - April H. !'*■!.
Lv. Macon . . ..19 on.i
Lv. Mlllerireville
Ar. Cams eg. . .
Lv Cnraack.. . .
Ar Augu>ta. C. T.
Lv Augusta, E. T.
Lv Florence. . . .
Lv Fayetevllle. .
Ar Petersburg. . .
Ar Richmond. . .
Ar Washington. .
Ar Philadelphia .
Ar New York. . .
Al N v W 23d at
Trams arrive from Augusta and point:
on main line 10:55 a. m. and 9:23 p. m.
From Camack and way stations 1:00 p. m.
, . A. O. JACKSON. Gen. Pam. Agt.
W. W. Hardwick. Gen. Agt., 409 Cherry
Cb**rry
W. C
Cherry st., Macon. Ga.
McMillin. Soliciting Agent, 4C9
McCrary Jewelry Co.
MACON & III It MI VGII AM RY. CO,
IMne Mountain Route.
Schedule Effective June 30, 1901.
7p i 3i i i aftr
AMT