Southern literary gazette. (Charleston, S.C.) 1850-1852, November 06, 1852, Page 210, Image 8
210
quiries of him concerning George Harris,
and being told of his flight to Canada, ex
claims with fervour “Thank God !” She
then explains that George Harris is her
brother, that she had been purchased
many years before by a West Indian
planter who had emancipated and married
her, that her husband had lately died, and
that she was now on her way to Kentucky
for the purpose of setting George at li
berty. We shall not stop to comment
on this string of unnatural incidents, for
something stranger is about to transpire.
George Shelby in speaking of George
Harris mentions his marriage with Eliza.
We quote the rest of the conversation—
“ ‘Was she born in your house V said
Madame de Thoux.
“ ‘No. Eather bought her once, in one
of his trips to New Orleans, and brought
her as a present to mother. She was
about eight or nine years old then. Fa
ther would never tell mother what he
gave for her ; but, the other day, in look
ing over his old papers, we came across
the bill of sale. He paid an extravagant
sum for her, to be sure. 1 suppose, on
account of her extraordinary beauty.’
“George sat with his back to Cassy, and
did not see the absorbed expression of her
countenance, as he was giving these de
tails.
“At this point in the story, she touch
ed his arm, and, with a face perfectly
white with interest, said, ‘Do you know
the names of the people he bought her
ofT
“ ‘ A man of the name of Simmons, I
think, was the principal in the transac
tion. At least, 1 think that was the name
on the bill of sale.’
“ ‘O, my God!’ said Cassy, and fell
insensible on the floor of the cabin.”
Os course Eliza turns out to be Cassy’s
child, and we are soon entertained with
the family meeting in Montreal, where
George Harris is living, five or six years
after the opening of the story, in great
comfort.
Now, the reader will perhaps be sur
prised to know that such an incident as
the sale of Cassy apart from Eliza, upon
which the whole interest of the foregoing
narrative hinges, never could have taken
place in Louisiana, and that the bill of
sale for Eliza would not have been worth
the paper it was written on. Observe.
George Shelby states that Eliza was eight
or nine years old at the time his father
purchased her in New Orleans. Let us
again look at the statute-book of Louis
iana.
In the Code JVoir we find it set down
that
“Every person is expressly prohibited
from selling separately from their moth
ers, the children who shall not have at
tained the full age of ten yearsf
And this humane provision is strength-
SOUTHERN LITERARY GAZETTE.
ened by a statute, one clause of which
runs as follows—
, “Be it further enacted, That if any per
son or persons shall sell the mother of
any slave child or children under t'e age
of ten years separate from said child or
children , or shall , the mother living , sell
any slave child or children of ten years of
age or under , separate from said mother ,
such person or persons shall incur the
penalty of the sixth section of this act.”
This penalty is a fine of not less than
than one thousand nor more than two
thousand dollars, and imprisonment in
the public jail for a period of not less
than six months nor more than one year.
Vide Acts of Louisiana , 1 Session, 9th
Legislature , 1828-9, No. 24, Section 16.
What will be said now of the story of
Cassy and her children ? Really Mrs.
Stowe should be more cautious in the
construction of her works of fiction. And
yet we know not but the fancy-sketch of
the separation and the reunion was the
best finale “Uncle Tom’s Cabin” could
have had. There is a fitness, a sort of
epic unity in making a book of the most
absurd improbabilities wind up in an im
possibility that we can not think open to
criticism.
We have devoted a much larger space
to the plot of “Uncle Tom’s Cabin” than
we designed, when we commenced this
review; it only remains for us to consi
der briefly those points upon which the
authoress rests her abuse of the South
ern States, in the book as a whole.—
These may be reduced to three, —the
cruel treatment of the slaves, their lack
of religious instruction, and a wanton dis
regard of the sacred ties of consanguinity
in selling members of the same family
apart from each other.
We have already shown, by a reference
to the laws regulating Slavery in the
Southern States, that many of the alle
gations of cruelty towards the slaves,
brought forward bv Mrs. Stowe, are ab
solutely and unqualifiedly false. As for
the comfort of their daily lives and the
almost parental care taken of them on
well-regulated plantations, we may say
that the picture of the Shelby estate,
drawn by Mrs. Stowe herself, is no bad
representation. The world may safely
be challenged to produce a labouring
class, whose regular toil is rewarded with
more of the substantial comforts of life
than the negroes of the South. The
“property interest” at which the author
ess sneers so frequently in “Uncle Tom’s
Cabin,” is quite sufficient to ensure for
the negro a kindness and attention which
the day-labourer in New England might
in vain endeavour to win from his em
ployer. But we surely need not elabo
rate a point which has been settled so
well by Southern writers before.
The lack of religious instruction for
slaves is a charge aga^ s t the South, in
great favour with Northern fanatics, many
of whom are deplorably in Want of “reli
gious instruction” themselves, ab-3 vastly]]
beneath the pious slave in that low f or
their neighbour which is the keystone
the Christian arch. Yet never was there
a charge more extravagant. We can tell
these worthies that throughout the South
ern States a portion of every house of
worship is set apart for the accommoda
tion of slaves ; that upon very many
plantations may be seen rude but com
fortable buildings, dedicated to God,
where stated preaching of Ilis Holy
Word is ordained ; that Sabbath schools
for negroes are established in several of
the Southern cities; and that in every
Southern family, almost without an ex
ception, where morning and evening pray
ers are held, the domestics of the house
hold are called together to unite in them.
Instances of fervent and unaffected piety
among the negroes, where they have not
been tampered with by Abolitionists, are
by no means rare. The entire absence
of anxiety of mind, with the negro, aris
ing from the perplexities of business and
the lack of employment, and the practice,
habitual to him from his birth, of resign
ing all care for the morrow to his master,
are favourable to the reception of reli
gious truth, and we believe that statistics
would show a larger proportion of pro
fessing Christians among the negroes than
among the whites. Writers like Mrs.
Stowe, in treating of this snbject, assume
that there can oe no acquaintance with
gospel truth among a class who are not
permitted to learn to read. But how
many of the early Christians were igno
rant and illiterate persons? The fisher
men of Galilee were men without in
struction when they first followed the
fortunes of the lowly Nazarene. As for
Mrs. Stowe, she is answered upon this
point in her own pages. Uncle Tom
was no scholar, and after many years of
diligent application could at last read his
bible with difficulty. Yet where shall
we find a nobler and purer exemplifica
tion of the “beauty of holiness” than in
him ? It is, indeed, a triumphant vindi
cation of the institution of slavery against
Mrs. Stowe’s assaults, that in a slave
holding community a character so perfect
as “Uncle Tom” could be produced. We
have, it is true, intimated that “Uncle
Tom” is somewhat overdrawn, not one
dash of human frailty entering into his
composition. Yet making due allowance
for this, and relying solely upon his bi
blical lore, we may take “Uncle Tom”
and deny, in the face of New England,
that there can be any serious lack of re
ligious instruction in a society of which
he was a member. Mrs. Stowe is, we
believe, peculiarly favoured in the way of
spiri ml advantages. Daughter of one
clergyman, wife of another and sister to
[.November 6,