Newspaper Page Text
THE ATLAOTA GEORGIAN AND NEWS.
WIDXMIUr, FBBgUAUI U, IK.
Bad enm an best cured by the famous Sr. Bull's Cough Syrup. It is
— a aure pro7ontivn of whooping oouyn
and croup. Thousand* of mother* Bare
their children from hours of torture and
threatening death by It* timely use.
. - -
{TrirrtfldAe.iiid.lt cured
two or
i have
DR. BULLS
COUGH SYRUP
DANCED WITH JOY
WHEN TOLD HE HAD
I
ESTATE
•MOPU «ent riouc
Brannen & .Anthony’s,
THE NEAREST DRUG STORE’
Orphan Boy Made Happy
By News of Wealth He
Would Receive.
gpsrlsl to Ths ftoorflii
Washington, (Is., Frliruarr U—Tbs la
formation ,-nrrled to Tb. Ooorsiaa at
tho food foftuno wblrb bn* rome to naor*.
and Kiln Hmltb la tbr olin|o’ of a largo
inherited rstnte la bwltsrrlsnd wan tb.
first DOW. rmluf by tho Motor, of St.
In (hi. i liy. wbsra one
Joooph srsdemr,
of tko rblblrru. Oeoffs Smith, bao boo.
taboo .gw of Mono the death of hla motbor
I* UN.
Tko sisters were r.ry miii-h plot sod with
_ _ word of tb _
orphanage In tbl. <-liy slnr* ho wao tbroo
roam of 1*0. while tho mtio follow boo
‘ raarhed Iho ago where ho ran fully
— tho'algnlflo.noo of llio nnnour
• °S
_ i|h|i
f Urrd In th«* *• ar»~ *»f th© (%lboUc
... ...
0f Atlanta*
ft lila father
•*With our special attention to telephone orders and
mpt delivery service, every family in this city can mu'™. of 1
prompt
consider ours “the nearest drug store.”
irtllfltrfy ifteMhc ilrpartura
to tli*» Philippine#. Ho far
llte alatera "f St. Jiwnh of-
' ‘ lit any oth#r ratatlrfa
Wl»« waa placed In
home, in Havannar
bit n.mlug to Waal
Dr.Lvra’s ^ hohe uo children
^ TO BE DISCUSSED
PBRFKOT
Tooth Powder
Used by p*oplo of refinsmaat
fox over a Quarter of a
oeatuzy.
Convenient for tourists.
pnssAaio py,
LJJfTT. -
riwx::
of Mid (tita and
for themselves, (half
associates, aonrwaaara aad assigns. .to bo-
o incorporated a ad or I bo atria tad
A. R ADAMB COMPANY
foil ton* of twenty ftOT y*»
tC*l Ilia
renews! at the. expiration
(SlOOt dolltra noli.
P a unnii ui m luamiii, scwiuin.
r Toluo of tbecspltal. stock, to a mm not
thousand .
'otltlooera do.tr. the right tab*-
gtn btiilneM wh.n tb* caplt.l atork hag
been aubarribod and M per cent thereof, baa
TELEPHONE US
FOR ANYTHING THAT COMES FROM A DRUG STORK.
AND FOR.
™ ™*XS
' 321 AND 323
WHITEHALL.. ST.
OPIUM and WHISKY * nd ,n b ' ,y and dru ‘ * dd,f
tfon* nclentlfloiilly treated with-
out ahork or never© Buffering
after. A homelike, pleaaant.
Comfort of patient* carefully looked
sanitarium, not a prtnon. Treatment entirely free from any harmful re
quite. Our thirty yearn' experience mIiown thexo dii'emtr* are vurabiw. K<*t
full partlcvlara, call or addrean The Victor Sanitarium or B. M. Woolley
Company, 104 North Pryor Strait, Atlanta, Ga.
SUPREME COURT CASES
r_r "FILED FOR MARCH TERM
I V l+?t*~*'**-*4*M»a V
fLong Docket Frorp
$ Every preuit in v ",
the List.
Tuesday wan return day fur
March term of the nupretilc court.
Oconee Circuit.
1. (trace V. Mean, et ul.
2. Ha*board Air Line Railway
‘Couroey.
■ 3. Kin* v.- Kin*.
I. Itrun.wlck and nirniln*hnm Rail-
« road Company v. Huodenpyle.
S. Plnnebad v. I'lnnetuul.
t. Hall v. Davis.
4. Atlantic and Rlrmlngham Railway
Company v. Roberaon. by next friend.
5 Hrantley Company v. Huutherand,
aheriff.
(. Southern Railway Company v.
Thompson.
7. Atlantic Coa.t Line Railroad Com.
pany v. White. ■_
* Wadley Lumber Company v. Lott.
9 Atlunttc and Hlrmtnirham Railway
Company v. Kirkland ct al.
10. Atlantic Coa.t Lino Railroad
Company v. Harrl..
II. Baxloy Tie Company v. Simp.on
& Harper.
11. Curry v. Curry, lulmx
13. Murray et al. v. Mctlulre.
■ • Atlanta Circuit.
L Atlanta Ict> and Coal Company v
Rarnee.
3. Morrlo Storage and Tran.for Com-
• pany v. Wilke.,
I. Lelnkauf v. Wellhotue
nkibiirnTTH
4. Craddock v. Kelley, iilmr, et al.
’'•-^TMrAj&v, JJAmey. i
■ h.^3t*3A (jpi. CoropkpxV Treat
*<* w# • T« \
7. Htarne* et SI. V. Atlanta lt>Ilce Re
lief AaMM'letlon.
0 Lyndon v. Georgia Unllway and
KleoUii* C.'ompaoy.
10. Georgia Hallway and Electric
Company v. Hamer, by next friend.
. 11. Uulnn v. Allen.
12. City of
friend.
»• fiiirn,
► c4P At^npt v^arper. by next
Trin.ii; caoatfMf.. . Company
n et al.
Viaduct Place
14. Georgia Railway and Electric
Dbvtew Company
Houchln Mf*. CO, •*
A flwafbv.. Harper
l«. City of
1J. Morila et al., admra.. v. tiunran
li. fia.llnga A-Co. v. Chrl.topher.
13. Itrook. v. City of Atlanta et al.
30. Mt-Uarry et al. v; Sel« et al.
31. (leorala Railway ami F.leelrlc
Company v. Town of Ouklund city et
Stone Mountain Circuit
I Georgia Uranlte R. Co. v. Venable
et al.
3. Neal et al. ve. Roykln
3. and Andaman v*. LouIrvIIIo
and Nashville Railroad Company et .il.
4. Atlanta and Went Point Railroad
Company v. Camp.
Alexander v». Thompaon.
0. Weaver vr. Davta ct nl.
?. Weaver vs Pavla el nl.
s. Vlrglnla>i'itrollna chemical Com.
patiy va. Young.
0. Georgia Railroad and Ranking
Company ut nl. va. Town of Decatur.
lo. Htone vr. Gurrclt a- IluaaGlt.
Middle Circuit.
1. Southern llell Telephone and Tele,
graph Company va. Smith
3. Boatwright va. William*
3. Wrtghtavllle and Tennllle Railroad
t'omiainy va Oornto.
4. ciaxton, executor, va. Lovett.
r>. city of Stateahoro va. Slmmona.
«. Ilendrlx va. • Daughtry.
7. Pariah va. Cowart.
s. Cahb va. Wrtghtavllle and Tennllle
Railroad Company,
a. Carter va. Tapley.
10. Macon, Dublin and Savannah
Railroad Company va. Joyner
11. Jones va. Roughlon *t al,
13. Walkhr va. Hodges et al.
13. Joyner vs. Macon, Dublin nnd
Havnnnnh Railroad Company.
14. Consolidated Portrait and Frnni,
Company va. ciaxton et al.
IS. Haahlnakl, aurvlvot, ve. Western
Cnlon Tclegraidi r'ompeny.
13. White va. Like*.
17. Aetna Insurance Company '
Llpalt* ,
13. Wldlncamp va. James.
Augusta Circuit.
1. Reynolds et al. vs. Norvell et al.
2. Nugent vs. Watkins.
3. Lucas vs. Southern Railway Com-
4. Gibson va. Wilson.
E. Gibson, by next friend, va. Wilson.
8. Johnston, by next friend, va.
terprlae Manufacturing Company.
9. Harley va. Riverside Mills.
10. fulhreath va. Martin.
11. Downey va. Pogerty.
12. Phlnlay vs. Bush.
13. Dugiu va. Hammond.
Eastsrn Circuit.
1. Drought et al. vs. Poage.
2. Southern Railway Company
Rosenheim A Son*
3. Rater-va. Baler. - -
4. Iloltsendorff vi. DeUenne
.agd Casualty
Atlantic Circuit.
I. Zlpserbr vat Seaboard Air Line
Ballwdjt Company. ■ *"
S j - Maotin Circuit.
RedtngtlsM & Co. vs. Hates Ad-
vortl-ln* Company.
3. Thomas & McCafferty vs. Selael.
aprvlvor.
Dunlap Hardware Company v
Tliurue..
Si-hofleld v. Little.
Durden-ct nl. v. Soulltern Railway
Company.
’ Harris v. Raitllisni Railway Com-
pany.
7. Mr ran v. Benlt of Forsyth ct al.
s. Thomas et al. v, Rosa, et al.
». Wiley, orrty., for u*e, etc., V. June*
et nl. • *
it. Wollf, for use, etc.,, V. Southern
Railway Company.
II. Smith et al. v. mayor., et al , of
Marietta. » -
12 Dennarfl S Co., v. Rptler.
13. Newberry v. Johnson
14. Rogers v. American Guild et al.
13. Willingham \- Cone v. Hilgueuln
HI. Fidelity ami Dc|»>*tt Company of
Maryland v. Butler, receiver.
17. Emerson v Knight, for use, etc.
18. Fair v. Metropolitan Life Insut-
anco Company.
19. Tabor v, Macon Railway nn l
Light Company.
20. Central of Georgia Railway Com
pany v. Grlgg.r.
tl. Belfert v. Western Cnlon Tele
graph Company.
‘ Central ul tleotgln Railway Com
pany v. Ray.
23. Robinson v. Southern Railway
Company.
24. Hendlrv v. Adams.
Northern Circuit.
1, Pearson v. t'out-son ot al,
2 Hank of Sparta v, Rutts.
3. Palmer v Ingram.
4, Harden et nl., next friends, V.
, and „ ,
‘TVKUbfct or mi
perauUrj gain and |»rom ok iib ■iw»noia-
eta. and for that Mrpoor they pFopoao to
carry on a bnslaeaa of bayihff. arllfng and
manufacturing all kinds of dry goods, no-
ds, ooreltJes and knit
Ilona. Idttkcr -goods,
tho :
vest the proceeds of thr corporation In ancji
manner as *" “ “—
ers, lo iris!
f or tho government <>r the corporation and
t« officers, ami geuernlly to do any and all
tblu^r* usual, necessary and expidl^nt in
rled on.
C. The prluclpnl nfrico nnd boms of aatd
ror|M»rstloii wilt l>e In Fulton county, Goar*
gtn. hut petitioners desire for said corpora
tion the right go do business lu and to os-
All Intonated In the klafergertob. the
bane end (be children of AUesU are la-
*1t«t to sites,] IS- Mat la*.flag of tk.
AtUktx •odologlr.l Sotlsty which win be
bald la Carnegie library oa Tbaradsy svau-
Isg at d o'clock. Bavanl ldletaeUng peyera
M the relation of tbs Madwgxftaa to the
koaie will
riBSUARY 8HIPMBNT8
MAY BRRAK ALL RECORDS.
•tfectal la Tbs Gcnglam.
Brunswick, da* Fob. II.—It le Very
probable that the February (hipping
record tar the port of Brunswick will
unusually targe one, notwith
standing Iho fact that a strike ha*
ob during the month. If this
maintained during the ra
il will far ex-
malndar of tbs month
oee* that of January, which was con
eidtred to ba unusually good.
Many vessels have come .Into port
Isoe the first of the month, WHIle over
twenty which arrived during January
will dear apd sail duriag February.
DEBATERS ARE SELECTED
AT BMpRY COLLEOE.
Special to Tbs Georgies.
Oxford, as, Feb. It,—May debaters
have been chosen a*, follows:
Phi 6eminW—w. C. Cooper. Nor
wood. Oa; A. L Moore, Condor, Oa,
and Horace Bandlford, Oxford. Oa
Few—l. T. Pearson, Richland. Oa
8. C. Morgan, Tusculum. Oa.. end J.
N. Townsend. Tlfton, Oa
The February-debate has been post
poned until March 1.
INVITATIONS FORWAROED
TO PROMINENT GEORGIANS
lories sail po«*c*»loas of the Uni.
Wherefore- ncillloncra pray Utst they ba
ode a laxly corporate uimer tb* UBS autl
style aforskald, with all ut the rlgbta prlri-
leges heroin prayed anil to which they
ad f.y Inw.
W. It. TKilENOIt.
I'.tltJontr* Attorney.
of Feb-
uiay lie eSIltlod
Filed In offl,
il.ry, 1,07.
Clerk Huperlor Court, Fulton Coanty, On.
Special to The Georgian.
Macon, Oa, F>b. lit.—Thousands of
invitations have been forwarded
prominent business men In Georgia by
W. J. Dontan, secretary of Hie Geor
gia Immigration Association. These In
vitations ore directed to men In all the
-Aqlk- of business |tf« and enclosed
with ?ach Ibvltntton ls ti private curd
upon which the twply may be written.
From the Interest that has been dis
played throughout the stats In the con
ference 4n Macon on life 13th. one of
the largest end most representative
gatherings ever seen In this city Is to
be exiiected.
I, Arnold Broyles, clerk
trm- anil correct,copy of the spirt
chartsr In the matter ot the A. H. Adams
psuy, bs the same appears of file In this
C orpin
Witness niy hand and seal of office this
the Dtb itay of February, 11817
ARNbf.D RROYI.ER.
Clerk Huperlor Court, Knlton County, Gs.
IHeeb.
stockholders of the Georgia tlranltc Hull
CnniUer building, Atlanta,
Gs.. .on the »tli day of. February, 1307. al 10
o clock a. tii., at xrmetnm tssnsare of Ik*
tmnd* —f th* rood wUl Uc C'Jti*Mcrcrt_ hjr Its
Becrehiry
stockholders. W. U. FAIT
Ueorgla Rallrmul Company.
S. Hinton v. Brower.
fi. Harrison, ailmr., V. Hnrrlaon.
7. Bowen, Jewell A Co., v. Adams.
8. Mellon v. Browr. Bros
Western Circuit.
1. Gresham v. Hewolt.
2. ‘ Pylant v. Webb.
3. Lively rt nl. v. Hunter, cxr.”
4. Stocking v. Moury. *
E. Gower v. Fowler.
ti Edwards V. Hale.
7. cable ?oni|>any v. Hancock
8. Van Winkle Gin and Machine
inks v. Pittman et at.
3. Van Winkle Oln and Machine
Workn v. Mathews et nl.
10. Jordan v. Dooly.
11. Western Union Telegraph Compa
ny v. Cooper.
12. Bank of Lawrencevllle v. Rock-
inure A Co.
13. Rucker. r"o river, v. Williams.
14. Harris v. Clcghorn.
15. Harris ct ul. v. Equitable Securl-
rs company.
Nsrthsastsrn Circuit.
1. Tallulah Falls Railway Company v.
Purls.
2. Paris v. Tallulah Falls Railway
anpnny.
3. Williams v. Tallulah Falls Hall-
,iv Company.
t. White et al. v. North Georgia
Electric Company et al.
Mayor, etc., of Gainesville v. Mll-
Cornclla Planing Mill Company
Wilcox.
Capps v. Edwards.
Hawkins v. Tanner.
Brackett et nl. V. Etowah Gold
pps v. Eduards.
11. Roberta V. Dot-kins.
12. Roberts v. Docklns.
13. Tallulah Falls Railway Company
Harris.
Blua Ridgs Circuit.
1. Brooks v. Day et ak
2. Center v. McKinney.
3. Venable v. Burton.
Venable .
Ratclirre V. Smith ot al.-. commis
sioners. •
Chsrokss Circuit. -
1. Western and Atlantic ttbllroad
Company v. Clark, ndmlntatrator.
Z' Western and AtUn “
Company v. Loughiidfie.
3. Baker V. Keever.
4. Southern Railway Company
Puryaar.'
antic RaMroad
5. North Georgia Milling Company v.
Henderson Elevator'Company. '
rt. Loutsvllls and Nashville Railroad
Company et al. v. Hurt.
7. Western and ’Atlantic Railroad
Company v. Tate ct al.
Roms Cirouit.
1. -Shahan v. Love.
2. (lavender v. Atkins.
3. Van DyltC V. Menlo Fruit'Co.
12. Irey et al. r. (illy.of Rnjno at al..
4. Johnston v. Oeorgla Loan A Trust
No
Need
To
Suffer
WRITE US FREELY
and frankly, la strictest confidence
troubles, and Mating your age.
mi ADVICE, in pistn Mated envelope, and a vsl-
teUInc sH your
We «1U send you
l M-tugt Back an “Homs Tree to-, cot for Women
Address; Lbdtet* Advisory Ocptriswitt, The
Chattanooga MoSdne Co., CbstUnoo*s, Tsuo.,
Why Be Sick?
\
Ladles, do you suffer from headache, backache, sldeache, waist-
pains, Irregular habit, weakness, nervousness, irritability, general mis*
erableness and lack of ambition? If so, much of your pain and
suffering Is needless, for It Is due to diseases peculiar to your sex,
which can be cured by proper treatment For over 50 years
Wine of a0
Cardin’^
’S
has been beaol|tlng the** disease! In the parsons of over a million women, of whom Mn.
W. H. Gage, of 232 N. Clark St.. Chicago, la one. She writes; ‘I waa taken sick
three years ago and was In bed six months. Since than I have been troubled with head
ache, backache, leg-ache and avfut bearing-down palm. I could get no relief until I
began ta take Wine of Cardul. I have now been taking It about six weeka and f feel
like a new woman. My friends hardly know me." Tiy It for you r trouble.
At Every Drug Store in $1.00 Bottles
5. 8lm» V. Rchcusslcr.
6. Hill A Moqltrle v. Wheeler.
7. Smith ot Al. V. Moore, admr.
8. Chtdsey et ul. V. Brookes et nl.
9. Brookea et al. v. Chldsry et nl.
10. Gordon v. West.
it. Town of East Rome v. City of
Roma et al.
12. Walker v. Hlllyer.
13. Danmond V. Hlllyer. for use. etc.
Tallapoosa Cirouit.
1. Whlsenant v. Southern States
Portland Content Co.
2. (Ydartown Cotton A Export Co. V.
Miles.
3. Stewart v. Marietta Trust A
Banking Co..
James v. Cooledge A Bro.
Southern Railway Co. v. Harde
man.
Cowata Circuit.
Atlanta A West Point R. Co. v.
Hudson.
2. sterling v. Park.
3. American Beverage Co. v. Atlanta
Beverage Co.
Flint Cirouit.
1. Woolsey at al. va, Lawehe.
2. t-RWshe vs. Woolssy si al.
3. Thornton at al. va. Jackson, exr.
4. Southern Railway Company i
Poi>e.
J* fttn BBWTMve
N6(l - AlcofeoHc
TONIC
of the day, made entirely of native
medicinal roots and without a drop of
alcohol in its composition, is known a$
DR. PIERCE’S
GOLDEN MEDICAL DISCOVERY.
There are no secrets about its com*
position—all its ingredients being
printed on the bottle-wrappers.
The "Golden Medical Dacovery”
not only builds up the strength of
the feeble, debilitated, languid,
nervous and easily fttigtftd, wheth
er young or aged, but it enriches
and purifies the blood, thus making
the improvement lasting.
It corrects and overcomes indi
gestlon, dyspepsia, biliousness, tor
pid liver, chronic diarrhea and
kindred derangements of the stom
ach, liver and bowels.
Bronchial, throat and laryngeal
affections, attended with hoarseness,
persistent cough, and all mariner of
catarrhal affections are cared by the
"Golden Medical Discovery."
Inf Chronic Nosdl Catarrh, it is
well to cleanse the Basal passages
ont freely with Dr. Sage's Catarrh
Remedy fluid while ' taking the
"Golden Medical Discovery’’ ax a
constitutional treatment. Old ob
stinate cases of catarrh yield to this
thorough count of treatment.
Through enriching And purifying
the blood, the "Discovery" cures
scrofulous affections, also blotches,
pimples, eruptions, and other ugly
affections of'the skin. Old, open,
running sores, or nlcers, are healed
by taking the “Golden Medical Dis
covery" internally Brid applying
Dr. Pierce’s AlWHeallrig Salve ak
a. local dressing,'- The Salve can
by return mail on receipt of 5*
cents in stamps. Address Doctor
Pierce as below for it.
In short " Golden Medical Dis.
covery ” regulates, purifies and in*
vigurates the -whole system and thus
cures a very large range of diseases.
The reason Why it curies such a
varied list of diseases is made clear
in a little booklet of extracts from
the leading medical authorities,
compiled by Dr. R. V. Pierce, of
Buffalo, N. Y„ and which he will
be pleased to send post-paid and
entirely free to any who send him
their names and addresses.
Ypsef'tafMtivx. ept a sub*
stitnte of iMstfimrii "composition
for this non-secret mbdicine of
KNOWN COMPOSITION.
Dr. Pierce’* Pleasant Pellets cure con-
■tipation. Constipation is the came of
many dileases. Cor* the cause end voo
epra the disease. One " Pellet" i* 1
S mtle laxative, and two • mild ctthir-
c. Druggists sail them, and nothing
is "just u good." They ore the original
Little Liver Pill* first put np bv old
Dr. Pierce over 40 year* ago. Much
mg,'- iueoaive can eiotttfconnd oow." Addreta Dr
be had of druggists, or «fll be sehtia* abort. ** ''
imitated, bat never equaled. They in
granules — euy is
tiny sugar-coated
take at candy.
Dr. Plaice’s Medical Adviiar (lOri)
page*) Is sen* Aw on nN^t of n one-
cent stamps (to cover cost of txsailingl
for psper-eoTeird, or 81 stamps for
‘ ~ rlerci
llwny Company
Jordan. •
7. McDonald vs. Siwoll, sheriff
8. Uoortwyn vs. Uentral of Oeorgla
Railway Company.
9. Thompaon va. Recliham.
ID. Beckham et al. va. Beckham.
11. Barham ct nl. vs. Weems et al.
12. Redman Broth -rs va Mays.
II. Houlharn Railway Company vs.
Tollerson.
13. Hodgaa va. City of Jackson el al.
Oomulge* Circuit.
1. Price va. Price al al.
2 Maynard et al. vs. Oreer at at.
3. Brooks vs. Robson.
4. Robert et al. vs. Kslly.
E. Kelly va flobet t et al.
(. Cheney vs. Louisville and Nash
ville Railroad Company at si.
7. Rousch Jrs. Green.
8. Rhodes, Dolvln A Co. vs. Con
tinental FuroflUr* Company.
3. Hall ve;"Co*U et al.
10. Georgia RhlnoEd and Banking
Company-vat Lloyd.
11. Loulavlllg^ aifl Nashville Rail
road Company aval. vs. Varner.
12. Mayor, ate., of Madison vs. Thom
as. by next-Niskid..
13. Mason el al. vs. Terrell, governor.
ChaAahoaoha* Circuit.
1. Baldwin ti Lowe.
2. Swift vs. Swift et al.
1. McDaniel va. ‘twin Manufacturing
Company. *
4. Olddan *1 al. vs. qiddens.
3. Fay A Eagan Company va. Dud
ley A Boos. ,
3. 8lory. vs. Bull.
7. Central of Georgia Railway Com
pany va. toman A Co.
8. Central ot Oeorgla Tlallway Com-
f va. b -- - -
pany va. Inman. Akers A Inman.
9. Eagle A Phenlx Mills vs. Muscogee
Manufaoturlng. Company.
PatsLla Cirouit - ‘
I. Smith vs. 8k*|ipard.
x. Strickland, administratrix, va
Thnrhton A Nosworthy.
3. Randolph County vs. Ellis.
4r-Gftv*F xra^AIIller.
3. Sorrels vs. Matheas.
». Earir county vs. Fain.
7. Hartford Fire Insurance Company
1. Liddell Company. /
(. MaiWllltams st al. vs. Jacobs et al.
Southwestern Cirouit.
1. Vogt Machine Company va. Bai
ley.
2. Hougabook Vs.' Atlantic and
Birmingham Railway Company. v
3. Jackson vs. Williams.
4. Clark, administrator, vs. Mutual
Life Insurance Company of New York.
Cerdols Circuit.
1. Clark A Williams vs. Empire
Mercantile Company.
2. Merchants' and Farmers’ Bank vs.
Seaboard Air Line Railway Companv.
I. Cordcle Sash, Door and Lumber
Company v. Wilson Lumber Company.
4. Glenn, sheriff, v. Graham, solicitor
general.
, Albany Circuit.
1. Glllts v. Pow'ell.
2. Broun v. Brawn.
.1. Britt v. Davis.
I. Worth County v. Sikes, treasurer.
5. Georgia Southern and Florida
Railroad Company v. Greer.
3. Simpson A Harper 8. Handers A
Jenkins ct ul.
7. Martin, executor, v. Monroe.
8. Varner V. Thompson et al.
9. Allen A < o. V. Hastings Industrial
Company.
10. Commercial Union Assurance
Company, limited, of London, v. Chut-
lahoochee Lumber Company.
II. i.tvlngiton & Stawurt v. King.
13. Askcv.- v. Thompson.
Southern Circuit.
1. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Com
pany v. Hart Lumber Company.
2. Bell v. Foss.
3. Hand Trading Company v. Jones.
4. Austin v. Feral'* Sons A Co.
6. Taylor v. Chambers.
6. Gress Company v. Berry Bros,
'limited.
7. Clarke v. Knowles.
8. Monk v. Oay.
3. Supreme Lodge Knights of Pvthlss
v. Crenshaw.
10. Gray r. Swindle.
11. Cortor *4 al, v. Carroll, executor.
12. Dulum Grocery Company v. Ty
son A Vickers.
13. Melnhard, Bchaul A Co., V. Fol
som Bros.
14. Durant Lumber Company v. Sin
clair A 81ms Lumber Company.
13. Ford, administrator, v. Clark.
16. Penn v. Georgia Southern and
Florida Railway.
17. Clark v. Clark.
18. Walker v. MrCant, guardian.
19. Crosby v. Putman.
20. Drawdy, administrator, v. Hes-‘
tar*, guardian
21. Green et oL v. Hutchinson. T. &
Certified byjCourt o* Appeals.
COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA
dir,
Cam Argued and Submitted Mi
February 11, 1W7. /
78—E. W. Rucker vs. Tabor A Al
mond. from City court or .Elberton
»—W. D. Perktdx AV al, vs. J M.
Terrell, governor, from city couri of
Washington.
10—F. C. Austin vs. N. O. Long, frora
court ofWushlngtnn.
*1—M. E. Chapman V*. O. F Con-
wsll, from Elbert.
82— D. At. Ferry A Co. vs. Slattox h
Turner^Trom Elbert.
83— Houthern Cotton Oil Company va
Jim Gladman, from city court of Wash
ington.
80
rtfy
84— C. N. Bond ct al. vi. C. I. Kidd,
from city court of Elberton.
85— George Williams vs. Fain A
Stamps, from Wilkes.
86. 17—R. L. Moss Manufacturing
Company v«. Carolina Portlnml Ce
ment Company and vice versa, from
city court ot Athens.
88— W. R. Hearn at al. vs. I!. H.
Oower, from city court of Monroe.
89— Bouthern Railway Company vs
Chestnut Mountain Merchandise com
pany, from Hall.'
90— Houthern Railway Company va
Oliver A Morrow, from Hall.
91— Joe Landrum vs. W. II. Smith,
from Hall.
93— Houthern Railway Company *t
al. vs. W. M. Miller, from'cliy court »
Hall.
91—Houthern Railway Companv va
J. E. Rowe, from city court of Hall
county.
94— J. L. Landrum Vi. A. Y. M"*A
from Cobb.
*5—W. A A. Railroad Company va
J. W. Clark, administrator, from < »•
loos a. , „ „
86— H. E. Chapman at at. v* M. E.
Taliaferro, from Catooaa.
87— J. C. Johnson VS. Mrs
Douglas, from Gordon.
38—J. T. Payne vs. J.
from Gordon. . ...
89—Mack Charles v». H. L. Brooke.,
from Whitfield. ,
101—J. F. Oraaa vs. Barry Wrlgh.
from city court of Floyd county
1*2—R. Underwood at al. vs B***
A Heard, from Walker.
101—J. H. Reynold* vs. J. B.
from Floyd. ,
lOI-Jess. Beck vt. Standard m««
H.
Sirv*nt
Mills, from city totlrt bt Polk oonnty-
1U—Lot Favors vs. M. I-. Hath! oca
from Douglas. ' ,, ,
106— City of Codartawn v* > ■ '
Brooks, from city court of'l'olk c ' un '-'
107— Atlanta and Blrmlngh
Lina Rallwpy Company vs
Manus, from-etty court of Poll,
Me
1