Columbus sentinel and herald. (Columbus, Ga.) 183?-1841, June 20, 1840, Image 1
COLUMBCJS SENTINEL AND HERALD.
VOL. X.]
PUBLISHED EVERY lITVRDA V BI
JOSEPH STURGIS.
ON DROAD STREET, OVER ALLEN AND YOUffO's,
ROW.
Vi-.KiVlS— Subscription, three dollars per an
num r >avabte tn adwHico, or foua dollars, (mail
ca-e, evicted) where (MiynKUt is not made before the
expiration of the year. No subcrptioa received for
css than twelve months, without payment in advance,
and no paper discontinued, except at tne option ot
the Editors, until all arrearages are paid.
\ DVERTISEMENTS conspicuously inserted at
one dollar per one hundred words, or less, for
the first insertion, and fifty cents for every subse
quent continuance. Those sent without a specifica
tion of tbo number of insertions, will be published
until ordered out, and charged accordingly.
-d. Yearly advertisements.—For over 24, and
not exceeding 36 lines, fifty dollars per annum ; for
ovr 12, and not exceeding 24 lines, thirty-five. dollars
jut annum-, for less than 12 lines, twenty dollars
jut annum.
■'■■■l. All rule and figure work double the above p: ices.
Lklal Advertisement* published at the usual
i At -s. and with strict attention to the requisitions ol
the law.
Ai;. Sai.es regulated by law, must be made before
the. Court House door, between the hours oflO in the
morning and 4 in the evening—those of Land in
llie county where it is situate; those of Porsona!
Property, where the ietters testamentary, of adrnin
i ‘i .not! or of guardianship were obtained—and are
roquired to b ■ previously advertised in some public
1 1 a/elte, as follows:
;ikki y t s’ Sales under regular exCWifions for Tttin
■rv day.-, under mortgage fi fas sixty days, before
thc.dav of sale.
r'w.us Land and Negroes, by Executors. Ad
inims'ri’ rs or Guardians, for i v and before
the dav of sale.
ft \ i.es of Personal Property (except Negroes) forty
!)/. \ S.
(j, . , ions bv Cl -r’it of the Courts of Ordinary, upon
ait me vs inv. for letters of adfhiuistration, must
iihlishedfor thirty days. .
C, rat ions noon avvlication for dismission, by
t ‘.\” -;;t >rs. Administrators or Guardians, monthly
for six MONTHS.
Order* of Courts of Ordinary, (accompanied with a
cony of the bond or agreement) to make titles
to i. and, must he published three months.
Noth r> bv Executors, Administrators or Guardians,
of apple n'ion to the Court of Ordinary for leave
to sei i. the Land o Negroes of an Estate, roi'it
months.
Not icr.s by Executors or Administrator?, to the Debt
res and Ore li.ors .*( ap Estate, for six wr. j
Clerks of Court, No., will be allowed ;
the usual deduction.
p Letters on business, must he tost paid,
to entitle them to attention.
BANK REPORTS.
AY LSTERN BANK OF GEORGIA.
Rome, 2d May, 1840.
llis Ida o cy Ch: rlc” J. M< Donald.
: I I -v the heir r huewi.h to send your Ex
cel. ncy the report of the cor.dita nos ibis in. -million,
ii..-id*; up to Monday, the Gih tilt.
The U-tt r f the flashier, which I hope your Ex
c.elb nov has 1 e etofire received, will account satisfac
ton v fir the del iy iri forwarding the repor .
Very respectfully,
Your obedient s-rvan ,
YVM. SMI I 11, President.
Si dement “f th- condition of the / l r c:;t'rn Dank of
licjTgia on .1 Ininluy .1 pnl 0, 1810.
DU.
Capital stock paid in 139.335
Di-c.nnt account and reserved fond 9.4C4 01
Balance !ne to individuals and companies *30,745 42
I >i’e to oil., r banks 3,853 71
I livid uid> unpaid 286
Girona't m 47,780
3.-31,496 14
TV ayjr-'i'e amount of indebtedness to tXo Wes
tern ibi ‘ . *f Georgia by tbo Stockholders hereof, is,
..n iiic t.ay hi making Hus report. ?1S! Ik'S 62—no one
individual owing us much as §I(),(.C0
T!i • und T.-ig.ied, president ai;d ra Dior of the Wes
tern It ink of Georgia hnvi.tg l-een appointed to exam
i.i ■ ;!).■ uu.s an bd.-i ot •
r t up m ‘heir solvency, as required by the . ct of
util 1 inh-T, 1832. do cv.lily. that according lo
I'ieir j id ; ii. n . I'irr is §iGl -176 21 god, §l-1 297 88
dwuUii.i, <4,719 50 ot lu.d paper.
WM. SMITH. President.
U. \. GREENii,Cashier,
*. >f this §30,747 -2, about $20,000 are at !h.‘credit
of in.liu-I.mis indebted to the hank, and (her. fore cm
---n-il be <i h ihm'.i’ used by (hem than in the settlement
of their notes.
OR.
Notes ni; n ng to maturity 20,683 90
.in Ivitig o er and not in u t 35 682 75
do in stu 93,4?0 61
l!i!ls of i xhhongc due at Mobile B.SCO
do do lying over-?i
not in suit. ‘2,896 33
do do lyingover &
in >mt 13600
Due hv other banks and agents 25 609 19
}ranking house and lot 3 000
Expel!e and interest accounts 6,712 SC
Hubion 133 25
Specie in vau't 1 755
Specie certitieii e ] 2,1100
Gut rent bank notes and ca-h
Hems 2 892 71
$231 496 14
Grtreh, Flt'jo count'/. — William Pmith, pr'-si lent,
an i K.A. G*vu f, cut hu'r, bung duty sworn, pay,
jh.it Jin’ forig"ing statement < t the condition of the
Wes’ern B.itik of Georgia ip true, to the best of their !
kn >vle gj and belief. WAI. StMTII,
U. A.GIibIENK.
S.vorn to before tne, this first ;;v of May. ißto.
ROBERT WARE, j. i. c.
jVjetr : f S‘o kholdtr* in the IFe stern Bank nf Geor
gia, on Jla'uioj morning ,6th day of April, 1 810.
No. Shas. Ain’t pi.
Ambr ster \V G 5 1 i~>
Anderson G VV o 175
Anderson Nktliaa 10 Out)
Bailey * Hodge 20 700
Barry A L 10 850
Brinlec Asa - 70
B ason It D 5 175
Brvin ihoaias *lO 1400
Bryson J 11 10 850
Dryers W lv 5 175
Burnett John G 1 85
Burnett John S 10 SSO
]3mke Francis,deceased 6 210
Oamden M J 20 70U
Oavewder J II 5 175
Clay o:i John 2 701
Cleghorn Wm II 15 5-5:
11 ohb J 17 5 1 75 1
Coldwell John 74 25V0!
Copeland (.leo W 10 36U \
Davis N 10 850 1
Diaksan, A. 18 630,
Dickson Hoag & Kelly 5 178,
Dik's George J 5 175 1
KinteyS , y 10 350]
Fort Tomlinson 130 4550
Foster J K 11 385
Gordon T F 5 175
lladin Wni C 33 10355
Hardin A T 75 2825
Hargrove AN 180 6300
Hargrove Z B 460 16100
Harrison Wm G 10 850
HanisSt MePadden 20 700
Hamilton AM A 175
Hendri k Thomas 5 175
Henry Wm 10 850
Holland John G 10 300
Hopkins T T 1 4 490
Howeth Thomas 2 60
Hoyle A 10 350
Hoyle, Levy & Cos 10 350
Hoyle, Jones & Cos 10 SSO
Hubbard & Edison 20 G 75
Hunt F S 1 35
Jacobs John 10 325
Kerrs & Hope 40 I4uo
King J H 22 770
Lathrop B G 99 3465
Lay Wm 20 700
Lane & Perry 20 700;
Liddell James 30 10501
Lloyd Thomas 10 350!
Lumpkin John H 20 700 j
Marsh Spencer 20 7 0 1
McConnell Eli 10 350,
McConnell John 5 175
Miller Andrew ZJ 700
Meier J C 2 70
Mitchell DR 10 350
Montgomery M 30 1050
Morrw David 5 175
Newman S C 3o 1260
Newman & Cunningham t* flO
Niaholson L M 1 10
Patten, Chum. &. Cos 10 350
Philips J jo 350
Puc 3 5 175
Pulhi-n Thofna* Ju 350
Pyle John o,y 700
Roden S W g CO
Roden J Ii 2 70
Rogers James II ’ 151) 5250
Rogers Job jfj 350
Rut! Ml. j,, 350
Scales Wm 5 175
Scott J-& A 10 350
Smith Wm 3 :1 11235
Smith John no 3850
Smith E HA 65 2275
Spy Hock James M 1,57 5495
Story C l 2 70
Story J T 21 735
TerhitheC D 20 700
Wall bail Turman 63 2205
Waters Joseph 30 1050
Ware Robert 221 7735
I Ware Robert, trustee 205 7i75
White John A 2 J 700
Whom* Isaac 30 JOSO
Wheeler N B 10 350
Williams <i W 20U 7000
Williams S 159 5259
Williams G & S 35 1225
Wilson Hugh 10 350
Witherow Wm 10 350
Wood John 5 175
Wyly Wm C 5 175
Forfeited stock unsold 59 1545
4000 §139,335
An exhibit of the in doited nest of the Directors of the
!Vestern Bank of Georgia, respectively. as shown by
the books cf sand bank, on Monday, the bth day of
April, 1841).
William Smith 2 25
Spencer Marsh 604 47
John T. Story 1 .500
James Liddell 1 552 88
* James M. Spuiloek 4 122 18
& 7.681 73
W! en the above named Directors were elected in
1 January last, this aggregate amonnt was greater, and
| has been reduced s nee their election.
*Mr. Spuiloek is absent from the State.
Georgia, Floyd county —The above named Direc
tors of the Western Bank of G orgia, towit: William
j Smith,tSpencer .Vlarsh. John T. Story, James Liddell,
) and James M. Spuiloek, being duly sworn, say, dial
die above statement, showing their respective indebt
edness to said bank, is true, to the best of their know
ledge. WM. SMITH,
S. MARSH,
JNO. T. STORY,
JAMES LIDDELL.
Sworn to and subscribed before me, this 2d day of
May, 134*. A. PATTERSON, Notary Public.
BANK OK DARIEN.
April 23, 1840.
Sir:—ln compliance with the requisitions of the
Legislature, I have the honor to furnish your Excel
lency with the semi-annual report of this institution.
inad up to and including the first Monday of this
month. Very respectfully, your ob’t. serv’t.
N. J McDONALD, President.
To His Excellency, Charles J. McDonald, Gover
nor, MiHedgevilie, Ga.
Consolidated Report of the. Hat” and condition of the
Bank of Darien, and of its Branches, on Monday,
the bill day of April, 1840.
Dll.
To Bai k Notes issued, 772,190
On hand, 526,572
In circulation, ** 245,618
Capital Stock paid in, 651,050
Less redeemed, 2i5,865 135,185
Dividends unclaimed, 1,349 11
Deposits?,
Due to other Banks, 18 667 37
Time checks, 32,662 04
Balance reserved fund aferdedueting all
losses, depreciations of Ileal Estate,
and expenses to date, 20,438 5-1
§784 737 96
Cll.
By Cash balance, competed of specie :
In Gold, 5.801 97
In Silver, 13,795 86
§l9 697 3
Bills of other Banks, 4,546
Due by other Banks, 8 108 67 •
S.iiitnues due by Branches and agents 67 263 47
Exchange discounted, deducting ali bad, 23 243 74
Notes, do do do 569,913 21
Stocks of other Banks, 9.000
Real Estate, deducting depreciation, 82 058 G 4
Protest account, 906 50
§784.737 96
Bank of Darien, April 23 1840.
N. J. McDONALD,President.
EBEN. S. REES, Cashier.
Statement of Bills of Kxchange. and of JVt.t s dis
counted at the Bank of Darien and its Branches,
showing the amount considered bad, doubtful, and
good; also amount in suit, under protest and running
1 1 maturity, on Monday , the 6 th day of April, 1840.
Amount of Exchange discounted, $23,243 74
the above considered good :
Amount in suit, 9,700
Under protest, 7,652 35
Running to maturity, 5,891 39
Amount Notes discounted, §632,778 24
Amount considered bad, 62,865 03
do doubtful 35 157 20
do god, 534.766 01
Amount in suit, 351,526 13
Under protest, 78,091 03
Running to maturity, 203 161 08
” §632 778 24
Bank of Darien, April 23, 1840.
N. J. McDONALD. President,
EBEN. S. REES, Cashier.
I As! oj Stockholders of the Bank of Darien, on Mon
day, the Bth April, 184 U.
Names. No. of Sh’s. Amt. pd in.
A kmsoii George estate of 4 260
Atwood Henry 15 975
Andrews Assistant Cashier 111 7.215 ‘
21
Bowen, Heratia, 22 l.^T
Sarah Ann 100 6,500
Cissna, II Green 15 975
Cooke, A U 25 1,625
Champion, J H 15 975
Collier, John 6 390
Dean, Benjamin 8 ;520
DelanottS Jacob jr 18 1,170
Ely, Charles 15 975
Flournoy, JJ 45 2,925
Field, J 1J 15 975
Fort, William 5 325
Green, AH 25 1,695
Gibs®n, Patrick estate 68 4,420
Harris, Caroline II 715
Hand, B E estate 4 260
Jennings, Thomas J 10 650
Jackson. R B 50 3.250
King, R St W & Cos SO 3,000
Kenan, M J 10 650
King, William 8 520
King, Ralph ?. 130
King. Roswell jr. 2 130
King 11 &W 5 325
King, Thomas cashier 15 975
Hutchison, Robert 110 7,150
Liddle, James 15 975
Me Rea, Robert 20 I,SOO
McConnell, Ely 15 975
Mitchell, Alexander 17 1.105
Mitchell, Henry 10 650
McDonald, J (J 15 975
Mui-, EL 2 130
Muir M Vi 2 130
Muir, J W 3 195
Mclntosh Connie Academy 14 910
Nichols, Alex. Y 20 1.300
Pa 1 mer. Samuel 25 1.625
Parkman, SB 31 2.015
Poe, William 63 4.095
Patrick, A 1 19 1,040
Penfield. Josiah estate 45 4,225
Roll, Luther 15 975
Rogers, George T 15 975
Stubbs, Thos B 10
Snee l, AII 5 325
Street, Samuel M l 1 9,2b0
Troup James 6® 4.420
Tavior, Hugh estate 4S 3.120
Taylor, Thotnas “5 4,87*
Wofford, W B 15 975
Woalaey, W W 20 1 ,*OO
Williams. Ru;herford Ex’rs 15 975
Walton, Robert ItD 6 jOO
Wood, Jacob 15 975
Williams K F 4 360
‘ WE HOLD THESE TRUTHS TO BE SELF-EVIDENT, THAT ALL MEN ARE BURN EQUAL,
COLUMBUS, GEORGIA, SATURDAY MORNING, JUNE 20, 1840.
Yoiige, Ph R 14 910
Individual Stockholders 1694 111 160
Centra! Ba'.k State Georgia 5000 325.000
Owned by the Bank, 3306 214,890
No. of sh’s. and Am’t. p’d. ia 10,000 651,050
♦Owned by the Bank.
Geoegia , Mclntosh coun'y: —Norman J. McDonald,
President, and Ebe.nezer S>. Rees, Cashier of the
Bank of Darien, being duly sworn, sav that the re
turns herewith made and annexed, contain to tfie best
of their knowledge and belief, a true and correct ex
hibit of the state and condition of the said Bank on
Monday, the 6th day of April 1840, as required by the
Legislature ; and that of the amount of notes discount
ed, the sum of nineteen thousand eight-hundred and
ten dollars is secured by pledges of stock at this Bank.
N. J. McDONALD. President.
EBEN. S. REES, Cashier.
Sworn to before rne, this day, April 23, 1640.
HY. T. HALL, Notary Public.
C I R CULAR:
EDWARD J. BLACK TO HIS CONSTITU
ENTS, AND PARTICULARLY TO THE
STATE RIGHTS PARTY OF GEORGIA:
(0 ncluded.)
Permit me, fellow citizens, 10 offer you
another reason why I, as a State Rights man,
cannot support General Harrison. It is ad
mitted that he is now, and has, for some time
past, been in the keeping, and under the
control of a confidential committee of three
known and asccertained Federalists. He has
suftered this committee to throw itsed’ be
tween him and the people; lie is a candidate
lor office, and when those whom he would
make his constituents respectfully approach
him with a request that he will make known
to them his views and principles on certain
questions of vital importance, instead of an
swering them as respectfully as he was inter
rogated, either by a renewed deiliration, tr
by a leterence to liis expressed opinions, ihey,
the people, are told by the committee 1 that
the policy is that the General make no fur
ther declaration ol iiis principles for the pub
lic eye while occupying his present position.’
You are ready to exclaim, ‘ Can this be true ?’
1 cite you to the proof On the 31st January,
1840, Miles Hotchkiss, the corresponding
secretary of the Oswego Association, ad
dressed a letter, in accordance with a resolu
tion of that body, directly to General Harri
son, couched iri respectful terms, and therein
propounded the following important ques
tions :
1. ‘Are you in favor of receiving and
referring petitions fir the immediate abolition
of slavery in the District of Columbia ?
52 ‘Are you in favor of a United States
Rank, or some institution similar to that, for
the safekeeping and disbursing of the public
moneys, and lor giving a currency throughout
the Uninited Stales?
3. ‘ Would you favor the passage of a
genera! bankrupt law by Congress, so that
its operations might be equal in aii the States
of the Union ?’
This letter was closed with the usual civili
ties of respect and obedience, and on the
the 29th February following, David Gwynne,
J. C. Wright, and O. M. Spencer, styling
themselves General Harrison’s confidential
committee, answer it under their own proper
signatures.
‘ Cincinnati, February 29, 1810.
‘ Oswego Union dissociation :
‘Gentlemen: Your 1 iter of the 31st u!t.,
addressed to General Harrison, Ims been
placed in our possession with a view to early
attention. This is unavnidat le in consequence
of of the very numerous letters daily received
by the General, and to which his reply in
person is rendered absolutely impracticable.
As from his confidential committee, you will
look upon this response, and if the policy ob
served by the committee should not meet with
your approbation, you will attribute the error’
rather to ourselves and his immediate advi
sers than General Harrison. Tlffit policy is,
that the General make no further declaration
of his principles for the public eye while occu
pying his present position. Such course has
been adopted, not for purposes of concealment
nor to avoid all proper responsibility; but
under the impression that the General’s views
in regard to all the important and exciting
questions of the day have heretofore been
given to the public fully and explicitly; and
that those views, whether connected with
constitutional or other questions of very great
interest, have undergone no change. The
committee are strengthened in regard to the
propriety of this policy; that no new issue
be made to the public, from the consideration
that the National convention deemed it im
politic at the then crisis to publish any gene
ral declaration of the views of the great Op
position party, and certainly the policy at the
present remains unaltered. In the meantime,
we cannot help expressing the hope that our
friends every where will receive Ihe nomina
tion of General Harrison with something akin
to generous confidence. When vve|'eflect
upon the distinguished intelligence of the
nominating convention—how ably all inter
ests were represented in that body, we cer
tainly have a high guarantee that, should
General Hariisou he the successful candTdaie
lor the Presidency, that office will be happily
and constitutionally administered, and under
the guidance of the same principles which
directed our Washington, Jefferson, and
Aladison. Believing you will concur with us
In the propriety of the policy adopted, we
[have pleasure in subscribing ourselves,
Your friends,
DAVID GWYNNE,
J. C. WRIGHT,
O. M. SPENCER.
11. E. SrENCER, Cor. Sec’v.’
This extraordinary committee say that as
the Harrisburg Convention, in which body
all interests were ably ref resented, deemed ii
‘impolitic’ to publish any general declar
ation of the views of the great Opposition
party, they are strengthened in regard to the
propriety of the course they had adopted.
Who, let me ask, represented tl e interests cr
the principles of the State Rights party, or of
any portion of the State of Georgia, in that
convention of bank men, speculators. Feder
j alists and Abolitionists ? When did the State
Rights party appoint a delegate to represent
them in that convention? Was it done at
our meeting in MiHedgevilie on the 17th De
cember, 1539, when Gen. John N. William
son, of Newton, being in the chair, and M.
Spencer, of Liberty, secretary, the following
resolution was unanimously adopted r
‘ Resolved, Unanimously (as the deliber
ate opinion of this meeting,) That neither
William Henry Harrison nor Martin Jan
Bttren, is entitled to the vote of the State
Rights party of Georgia.’
I put these questions not with a vindictive
purpose, but to rescue my character from the
foul calumny of misrepresenting*my constitn
ents. But aside from this, let us look again
at Genera! Harrison in the keeping of his
committee. He is a candidate for the high
est office in the gift oi the people; his views,
principles, and opinions, are of immense im
portance to those who may hereafter become
his constituents—the people demand to be
informed of them— lie refuses to answer, and
a eommittee of three men, two of whom sup
ported the younger Adams, and the other the
elder Adams, take the responsibility of declin
ing to give the information required ; General
Harrison, they say, will make no more new
issues ; ii is * impolitic’ to do so, and that his
views have already been given to the public!
Grant that they have, and that his principles
are engra vedjon ‘monumental alabaster,’ shail
he be permitted to insult and treat with con
tempt ihe constituency of tins country by a
studied neglect of, and refusal to answer their
interrogatories on subjects in relation to
wbieh they have a right to call on him to speak
in his oivn proper pert jn ?
Will such a course as this be tolerated in
Georgia, and by State Rights men too, who
go ail tor principle and nothing for men?
There are many subjects on which General
Harrison has not, so far as I am informed,
pubiicly expressed his opinions; but even il
tie had, there can be no excuse, no palliation
for this immense outrage on the rights and
feelings of the people. Suppose, fellow-citi
zens, I had pursued a couse like this in 1533.
when I had the honor to be interrogated by
the voters of Franklin and Taliaferro in rela
tion to my principles! Would you have tol
erated it? Suppose George M. Troup be
nominated by the June Convention for the
Presidency, and should refuse to answer, as
General Harrison has, would you tolerate it ?
The reply is in every man’s mouth, No, no!
If then, you would not trust your own Troup
upon his preconcerted silence, will you trust
a stranger on his, and that slranger William
H. Harrison? To these questions there can
he but one response from the mountains to
the seaboard, and that respon°e will speak in
thunder in October next to ihe aiders and
abetters of this silent candidate.
General Harrison professes to heheve that
Congress has no constitutional power to
incorporate a bank, and yet is in favor ol such
an institution on the ground of expediency.
This is a starting position. W bile it places
expediency above principle, it lends to open
the door to the general welfare system, under
which a majority can at all times mould the
Constitution to their own wishes. Con
vcnience will soon be converted into necessity.
and every thing like strict construction will
give way to ihe powerful influence of the
great bank interest. If General Harrison is
elected, the Constitution, at least in this par
ticular, will be set aside, and a hank will be
chartered because it is expedient to have one.
It will hardly he claimed that the Stale
Rights party have ever been a bank party :
a tew bank men have been tolerated in it for
the sake of preserving harmony, but the great
mass have ever been, as they are yet, opposed
upon principle and expediency to the estab
lishment of such an institution by Congrqfi*.
However, therefore, the few among us vvtim
have favored a bank either secretly or openly,
may deem it their duty to select General
Harrison because their ‘ principles agree with
his own, to go to the head of the column, and
bear up end advance the flag under which it
is hoped those principles may be maintained
and defended,’ I, as a State Rights man, who
have been consistently opposed to a United
States Bank, cannot be justly censured for
refusing to support a man who not only ad
vocates a bank in the most exceptionable
manner, but who is the selected candidate of
open and avowed hank men.
General Harrison recognizes the power of
Congress to appropriate money fiom the Fed
eral Treasury for the purpose of interned
improvement by the General Government, and
in many parts of the West, particularly in
that region through which the Cumberland
road runs, he is supported expressly on that
ground. He is, too, in favor of a protective
tariff, or at least he would abandon his ad
vocacy of that most ‘ unconstitutional, unjust,
and oppressive’ system, only when fie shall
have seen the streets of Charleston and Nor
folk covered with grass from its ruinous effe cts
and consequences. He has so expressed
himself. 1 have never yet heard it denied,
and if it ever is, the proof is at hand. Shall
l be condemned then for condemning these
principles of the HanwkrfWg nominee? or
shall I be censured (or ho#advocating the
man, while I am permitted, for consistency’s
s i epudiate liis principles'?
•ho-people of Georgia, and particularly
the Slate Rights party, may (eel some inter
est to know what position General Harrison
occupied in the Senate of the Uniled Slates
in 1826, when the old treaty of the Indian
springs was supplanted in that body by the
new treaty of Washington. The contest
whicii ensued between George M. Troup,
who, in behalf of Georgia, contended for the
recognition of the old treaty, and John Q.
Adams, the President, who attempted to sus
tain the new treaty, by which Georgia would
have los) a great portion of her lands, is vet
fresh in your recoiled ions. Out of that con
test Troup brought us with honor and glory :
our rights were gallantly and wisely main
tained; and after a severe struggle, the sur
reptiliouj treaty of Washington was nullified.
Where stood Harrison when the question
between the hvo treaties came up in the Sen
ate? I have the journals before rne, and I
make lrou> them tile following extract:
* Frida t, April 21, 1826.
; Mr. B- nton submit ted the fallowing reso
lution:
4 Resolved, (Tivo-tliirds of the Senators
present concurring therein), That the Senate
advise and consent to the ratification of the
treaty between the United Sl*tes of America
and the Creek nation ol Indians, concluded at
ihe City of Washington , the 2 4th day of Jan
uary, 1820, together with the supplementary
article thereto, dated 31st day of March,
1826.’
This res-lution you perceive ratifies the
new treaty, of course to the exclusion of the
old treaty, and for this resolution William H.
Harrison voted. The Journal proceeds :
‘lt (the resolution above quoted) was de
termined in the affirmative, yeas 30, nays 7.
4 Those who voted in the affirmative, are,
Barton, Bell,Benton, Boligny, Branch,Cham
bers, Chandler, Chase, Clayton, Dickerson,
Eaton, Edwards, Findlay, Harper, HARRI
SON, Hendricks, Johnson, of Kentucky,
Kane, Loyd. Marks, Mills, Noble,
Reed, Rowan, Seymour, Smith, Tazewell,
Thomas, Wiley.
4 Those who voted in the negative, are,
Berrien, Cobb, Hay tie, King, Macon, White,
Williams.’
There is one other curious and important i
fact, relative to this matter which I will not
now state. It does not, however, relate to,
or alter, the vote or position of General Har
rison. I shall have the Journals with me in
Georgia, and the fact to which I allude can
be then made to appear to the satisfaction,
or dissatisfaction, of any one who may desire
to be informed of it.
Whether General Harrison is an Abolition
ist, or not, depends very much upon the sig
nification and meaning you attach to the
word Abolition. If you say that lie who de
nies the right of Congress to aboiish slavery
in the States, is not an Abolitionist, then he is
free of that sin, and so is Mr. Adams and Mr.
Slade, for they, too, however ardent in the
cause, would refer it to the conscientious con
victions of the master. But if he who volun
tarily procures a certificate of his member
ship of an Abolition society’; who expresses
his abhorrence of slavery ; who would appro
priate the surplus revenue of the United States
to effect the abolition of it; who_ thanked his
I God, when he left the Stale of Virginia, that
he had that day got rid of Virginia slaves and
\ irginia politicians, and who hopes to live to
see the day when the North American .Sun
vviil not look down on a slave ; who has vol
untarily expatriated himself !rom his native
siavehoiding State, for the more congenial
clime ol a non slaveholding community ; it lie
who has said and done these things be in your
opinion an Abolitionist, then General Harrison
is most assuredly obnoxious to die charge.
These extraordinary views and opinions on
this vital subject, are attributed to him, and
recorded against him. Neither he nor Ids
committee can or will deny them, tor they are
capable of proof, 1 would insert that proof
in this address, if its unexpected length did
not admonish me to draw it to a close, f
however cannot refrain from submit.ing to
you a short letter from General Harrison
himself, which if it does not prove liitn to he
an Abolition si, at least proves him to be a
member of an Abolition society.
“TO THE PUBLIC,
SO"” Fellow Citizens.— Being called sud
denly home to attend my sick family, I have
but a moment to answer a few calumnies
which are in circulation concerning me,
“ i am accused ol’ being friendly to slavery.
From my earliest youth to the present mo
ment I have been the ardent friend of human
libertv. At the nie of eighteen I BECAME
A MEMBER OF AN ABOLITION SO
CIETY, established at Richmond ; the object
of which was to ameliorate the condition of
slaves, and procure their freedom by every
legal means. My venerable friend Judge
Gatch, of Claremont county, wnsaiso a mem
ber of this Abolition Society, and has lately
given me a certificate that 1 was one. The
obligation which I then came under I have
faithfully performed. * * *
WILLIAM HENRY IIARRISON.”
Now let tire slaveholders ol (lie State of
Georgia, of either party, after having read
ibis letter from under the hand of General
Harrison, even if there were no other proofs
against him, decide for themselves whether
lie is an Abolitionist or not. Talk not u> me
oflns acknowledgment of our naked consti
tutional rights, when he tells you it is a calum
ny to accuse him if being friendly to slavery.
Tell me not of his vote to admit Missouri in
to the Union, without restriction, when lie is
so solicitous to prove fie was a member of an
abolition society, that he actually obtains
and exhibits a certificate that lie was one.
Believe not the hollow pretence of his devotion
to the South and her domestic institutions,
when he asseverates to you that all the obii
fcg-aJinns he came under when he
abolition society, he has faithfully pefforUftd.
Whether he be an Abolitionist or not, is lor
you to decide; but do not condemn me, as a
slaveholder and a.southern man, for refuisng
to vote for General Harrison, when lie him
self has conclusively proven that he is a faith
ful member of an abolition society.
If General Harrison’s acts and opinions
relative to abolishing negro slavery he so oh- j
jectionable, what will the people of Georgia i
say ofhis vote, while a member of the Ohio I
Legislature, to sell a white man in order to ;
rai*e money to pav a fine and costs of suit ?
Let it be remembered f vve take General
Harrison we must take, his principles with him ,
and that there may be no mistake about this
matter, f will quote to you again from the
record.
Extract from the journal of the stair of Ohio.
Tues ay J, hi, SO 1821.
Senate met pursuant to adjournment.
The Senate then, according to the order of
the day, resolved itself into a committee of
the whole upon the bill from the House enti
tled an act for the punishment ol certain of
fences therein named,’ and alter sometime
therein spent, the Speaker (Allen Trimble) re
sumed the chair.
Mr. Fithian then moved to strike out the
19th section of said bill as lollows:
‘■Be it further enacted, That when any per
son shall be imprisoned, either upon execu
tion or otherwise, for the non-payment of a
fine or cost, it shall be lawful for the sheriff of
the county to sell out such person as a servant
to any person within this state who will pay
the whole amount due, for the shortest period
of service; of which sale public notice shall
be given at least ten days; and upon such
sale being effected the sheriff shall give to the
purchaser a certificate thereof, and deliver
over tlie prisoner to him, from which time the
relation between such purchaser and the pri
soner, shall be that of made) and servant, until
the time of service expires ; and for injuries
done .for either, remedy shall be bad in the
same manner, as is or may be provided by
law in case ol master and apprentices. But
nothing herein contained shall he construed to
prevent persons being discharged from impri
sonment according to the provisions of the 37 th
section of the act to which this is supplementa
ry, if it Ifiall be considered expedient to grant
such discharge. Provided that the court in
pronouncing upon person convicted under
this act, or the act to which this is supple
mentary, may direct such person or persons to
he detained in prison until the fine be paid or
the pers n or persons otherwise disposed of
agreeably to Hie provisions of this act.
Upon this motion of Mr. Fithian to strike
out the above section, the vote recorded as
follows :
‘Yeas—Messrs Boa sly, Brown, Fithian.
Gass, Keaton, Jennings, Lucas, Matthews,
McLaughlin, McMilton, Newcomb, Robb,
Ilussell, Scofield, Shelby, Spencer, Stone,
Thompson, and Womelcof—2o.
Navs —Messrs Baldwin, Ccie, Foos, Fos
ter, WILLIAM H. HARRISON, McLean,
Oswall, Pollock, Reggies, Roberts, Wheeler,
and Speaker.—l 2.
Thus you see that this section has not been
permitted to disgrace the statue hooks of Ohio.
And for the information of sceptical of the
p:ebaid party, we will append the (blowing
certificate, from the Secretary of State which
is endorsed upon its back—to wit:
Secretary of State's Office, }
Columbus, O. Sept. 10. 1836. 5
I certify that the foregoing is a true and ac
curate copy from the journals of the Senate of
the Siate ol Ohio, being the first session of
the nineteenth General Assembly, held at Co
lumbus, Dec. 1320.
See page 303. 30-1, 803,
CARTER B. HARLAN,
Secretary ol'State.
This, then, is the way in which General
Harrison would dispose of a white man,
whose misfortunes may have rendered him
unable to pay a fine and costs of suit imposed
on him for assault and battery, or for any
other violation of the penal code. When he
was Governor of Indiana, he gave his official
sanction to a law of the same character, pass
ed by the leg slature of that territory. If he
is elected President, and Congress should pass
an act in accordance with the above, to sella
defendant for the fine and costs of suit imposed
bv a judge of a district or circuit court of the
United States, tie would be bound, by 1 is
recorded vote, to sanction and give it the force
of law. Valuing my privileges as a white
man, and prepared to defend them to the last
extremity, I cannot, by the remotest indirec
tion, tolerate a principle so abhorrent to rny
feelings and destructive of my rights.
This is the man, fellow-citizens of all par
ties, w’hom the Harrisburg convention recom- *
j mends to you to receive ‘icith something akin
|to generous confidence /’ I know you io be
liigtiminded and generous; but I have yet to
learn that your generosity is to he tested by
your willingness to supports man, who do
| libererately voted to sei.i. a white man into
j servitude to raise money to discharge a line
! and costs of suit.
For William H. Harrison, then, 1 cannot
vote under any .circumstances; of Mr. Van
Buren I have little to say. I have heretofore
been opposed to him, with the hope and ex
pectation of getting a better man. 1 would
gladly have voted lor George M. Troup; I
was among the first in Georgia to propose
him as a candidate lor the Presidency. 1
will yet vote for him in preference to any other
man, it he is nominated with the bona fide in
tention ol electing him. But if he is to be
made the mere instrument of withholding the
vote ol the State from Mr. Van Boren in
order to advance the interests of General Har
rison, I cannot support him. If the June con
vention nominate Harrison, I, with thousands
ol other State rights men, vviil be driven to
the support of the present Administration by
the alternative offered, and from which there
; can he no escape. When 1 came here in
! December last, l was honestly and consci
| entiously neutral between the two great con
tending parties of Whigs and Democrats;
arid ! held myself in roseiv'e, with tire deter
mination to support such measures only as
squared up to my principles, and to allocate
that parly which came nearest to the position
I occupied. To the astonishment of every
i one, General Harrison was shortly afterward
i nominated ior the Presidency against Mr.
; Van Buren. This evicted anew state of
i things; and I watched the two parties narrow
| ly for the purpose of ascertaining who were
our friends. The first question which arose,
and on which I was called to act, was the
celebrated New Jersey question. In deter
mining iliat question, I asked not who were
Whigs or who Democrats; ! voted upon
principle to sustain the rights of those who
held the commission of the Governor in order
to organize the House, leaving the ultimate
right to their scats to future investigation.
Since that period, ! have generally voted
| with the Administration, because their meas
i ures were such as commanded my support..
; Let me call your attention to a few of those
; measures ar.d votes. You well recollect
(can you ever forget?) the resolution intro
duced in the House by Cost Johnson, of
Maryland, by which the standing rules were
ti) be so amended as to exclude the reception
of Abolition petitions. Had you any interest
at stake in that question ? I, myself, consid
ered it one of vital importance to the whole
South. Our interests, our institutions—nay,
our very existence as a people—depended on
the vote which was about to be taken. I
had stood by and witnessed for a fortnight a
violent and outrageous attack on onr rights,
I had heard you slandered, vil lied, and abus
ed, by the non-slaveholding Whigs, who alone
participated in the crusade against you.
You were ably and faithfully defended by
Judge Colquitt, Major Cooper, and Colonel
Alford ; and I, with your other Representa
tives. was anxiously endeavoring to obtain
the floor to add our voices to the indignant
replications which had been uttered iti’your
behalf. But the prominent men of the Dcm
osratic party said 1 No—reserve your spcecli
lor another occasion; our friends here are
prepared to sustain by their votes vour rights
and the interests ol your constituents.’ I
scarcely believed them ; 1 feared it was a
i hollow profession. But the critical moment
rame; the forces of the two parties were
drawn np in battle anav, and the conflict was
! about to begin. I stood by, almost breathless
with anticipation and excitement; for I knew
that upon the result of that vote all that vve
held dear and near to us would be immediate
ly a fleeted. Ibe vote was cast; we came
out of ihe fight victorious—safe, butscotched.
Who achieved the victory for us? Who
saved us? Who bore us out triumphantly
upon that ever-memorable occasion? I an
swer, upon my knowledge of the fact, the
Democratic party. Who were our uncom
promising opponents to the last? I answer,
upon my knowledge of the fact, every north
era Whig in the House save one, and four
southern Whigs, among whom was John
Bell of Tennessee, the Whig candidate for
Speaker, ‘i weniy-seven non-sla veliolding
Democrats voted with us, and sustained
even,though it might be at the imminent risk
and hazard of their own political annihilation.
1 frankly confess to you that the action of
Mr. Van Boren's Iriends, on that occasion,
made an indellihie impression on me. i care
not for their previous course, although from
tiie beginning it bas been more favorable to
us than that pursued by the Whigs, as can
be proven by the Journals of the House, I
had witnessed that day an act of pure devo
tion io principle, on their part, which drew
me closer to them, and convinced me that
they were our natural allies. Look, I pray
you, to the course pursued by a Democratic
Senator from Ohio, during this session. He
was charged by some of his constituents to
present certain abolition petitions to the Sen
ate. D,d he, as the Whigs have regularly
done, present them ? No, he refused” to do
it; and, in an able and patriotic speech, no
tijied the Senate publicly ofhis refusal. Look
again to the vote of the Senators, on Mr.
Calhoun’s resolutions relative to the brig En
terprise, introduced during the present session,
in the following words:
‘ Resolved , That a ship or a vessel on (be
high seas, in time of peace, engaged in a law
ful voyage, is, according to the laws of nations,
under the exclusive jurisdiction of the state to I
which her flag belongs; as much so as if con
stituting a part of its own domain.
‘ Resolved, That ifsuch ship or ve-se! should
be forced by stress of weather or other una
voidable cause, into the port, and under the
jurisdiction of a friendly power, she and her
cargo,and persons on board, with their pro
perty, and all the rights belonging to their
personal relations, as established by the laws |
of the Siate to which they belong, would be
placed under the protection which the laws of
nations extend to the unfortunate under such
circumstances.
I Resolved , That the brig Enterprise, which
was forced unavoidably by stress of weather
intol’ort Hamilton, Bermuda Island,while on a
lawful voyage on the high seas from one port of j
the Union to another, comes within the priii- I
cipies embraced in the foregoing resolutions; ;
and that the seizure and detention ot the ne
groes on board by the local authority of ibe
island, was an act in violation of the laws of
nations, and highly unjust to our own citizens
to whom they belcr.g.
These resolutions distinctly recognise our
right of property in our negroes; they were
adopted by a unanimous vote it is true: but
every non slaveholding Whig, with a solitary
exception, absented himself when that vole
was taken. Were all these actual demonstra
tions to make no impression on me? They were
proof to me, as strong as holy writ, that
Martin Van Buren was a northern man with
southern feelings. I had here ofore doubted
his professions: for he and his friends had
given no such actual demonstrations of their
sincerity; to the extent to which I desired them
to go. These are recorded tacts, and against
them bis enemies may array, if they pie- r,
his bygone doubts as io the power ol Cot -
grtes over slavery in the Distici of Columbia.
Actions speak louder than words; and I am
bound to support him as long as he support-:
us upon the question of abolition; espciallv
wi.e i his opponent, more objection'll,e on th:l,
score than he himself, is supported by th>*
Northern Whig party, whose course >n <!. •
absorbing topic is dead against us.- Mr Va
Buren L opposed to a bank; he i-, in favour of
an independent Treasury; lie is opposed t<
internal improvements by ll e General Gov
eminent; he is opposed to the assumption, hv
hie Federal Government, of the debts of tb.-
Slabs. lam assured that he is opposed to n
h;gb protective tariff; and I reier yoifilo o'-’
i hF messages since the extra session of ISSr
j lor a poweiiul and able exposition of manv <>•
jour own Stale Rights doctrines. I will “in
detain you with tlie abundant proofs of :
those assertions at this time. I have the:.,
with me, and shad, with vour permission, < •
htbii them to you during the next summer.!.
your own satisfaction.
j Previous to our last Congressional election
it was agreed that we might differ in opinion
on any point not affecting our State Rights
principles; and, with that understanding ike
present delegation was elected. But, assoou
as I attempted to am out that permitted d;f
lei cnee of opinion, f was denounced by a !< • •
individucis who would usurp the authority <
the whole party. The election for printer t
the House came on ; I voted for Blair & Rive.-,
in preference to Gales & Seaton ; and, up n
tins vote, ail the charges have been ru;
through the* Siate ol Georgia, as an evidenc
that. I had abandoned my State Rights prn
cip ! es. But, before 2 am condemned for that
vote, let us look at the relative position of
these, the only competent candidates offend
to my choice. I will not go farther back tin <
the days ol Troup and the treaty, when J >k-,
Qoincy Adams, now one of the Whig lead. • s
in Congress, but then at the head of the Fed
era! Government, threatened toiovadc the sod
of Georgia, 3nd to reduce her to obedien-.v.
and an inglorious abandonment of her right ,
by the force and efficacy of Federal bayonet-.
In that memorable contest, when you and t,
led on by George M. Troup, fought, should. •
to shoulder, for the maintenance of our ten -
toriai rights, where stood the National Intelli
gencer, edited by Gales & Seaton? Th -t
paper was the organ of Mr. Adams and sin.
ported and defended him in his vain and.
abortive crusade against the sovereign rights
of your state,
When the Supreme Court arrogantly cited
the State of Georgia to appear at her bar n,
show cause why the Indian murderer Tassel-,
should not be liberated and released, the Globe
vindicated and defended us, and the Inteiligen
cer was agauist us. In the celebrated mis
sionary case, Blair teas for us, Gales S? Seaton
against us. F. P. Blair advocates the Inde
pendent i'rcasurv—Gales &. Seaton oppose
it. Blair is opposed to a high protective ta
riff, to internal improvement, and to a United
States Bank. The editors of the Intelligence r
are the accredited organs of the tariff, internal
improvement, and bank party ; and the bai k
now holds a mortgage, not only on the estab
lishment itseif, but on all the ‘debts due to it,
and io become due.’ So if I had voted for
that paper I should actually have been voting
to make the bank a recipient of Gevernmen
patronage. Let us run out the parallel a little
farther: The editors of the Intelligencer, du
ring this session, have actually published a* I
spread out on their daily page the famous a!
edition speech of William Slade, delivered i.-r
Febuary last; and have consequently knov -
ingly and wilfully promulgated and circulate. .
in the State of Georgia, and throughout b
wiio'e Somh, oi e oft he ablest and most eflei -
live abolition speeches which has ever beer,
delivered in Congress. No! content with that,
they published the same speech in pamphlet
form. How did F. P. Bia r act in relation t->
that matter. He was applied to, and request
ed to publish the same speech in the Globe
newspaper, and he refused. It is trite that the
editor ofthe Globe was opposed to South Car
olina nu'lification, and ss was the Intelligence•
But when Georgia nidified, in the ’Lasses
and missionary cases, the Globe was with j r.
and the Intelligencer teas against us. ’j o
show that the National Intelligencer still mais
tarns and avows its ancient position of lio--
ti’i'v to Georgia, I extract from that paper,
of Febuary 6th, 1840, a portion of its edito
rial:
‘ We are, however, far from regretting that
the Government editor has recalled our at lei
tion to what We tlien said of the contemp
shown by the President ol the United States
and his followers and flatterers, toward <1 -
authority of the Supreme Court. It was w< !f
said ; and, if we mn v be excused the q’uotin.-
it back from the Globe, we will say it ov<.
again; for, at the moment it was uttered, ii
was solemn truth, spoken with sincerity .f
heart. Here it is;
* It is time, fellow citizens, that we come t<>
a pause, and solemnly reflect upon our situ;,
tion. The tariff has l eeu declared to 1 v
unconstitutional by more than one State ; in
ternal improvement has been denounced in
the same manner; the Untted States bank
lias been assailed in the same manr.er; and,
Worst of all, the authority of th* Judiciary is
set at naught—all under the banner of ‘Lib
erty and Reform.’ It is not necessary for us
to add, that,sustain these doctrines, and our
Government is at an end. The sword and
the bayonet will have usurped the oflice ot
appea's and writs of error, and the Supreme
Court will be substituted by some tribunal of
more summary proceeding.’
Here is a distinct avowal that, if the tariff’
interna! improvement, and the lank oj the Hin
ted States, be declared to be unconstitutional,
ana the authority of the Supreme Court, in
arraigninga S ale at her bar, be set at nought,
our government *at an end! Comment upon
ibis reiteration of these ultra federal doctrines
is unnecessary. This paragraph, which
Gales &. Seaton ‘quote back, 5 and appear to
glory in, was one of the numerous elf.irts it
made to prejudice the public mind agaii.st us
in our controversies with the General Gov
ernment, to which I have just alluded. I sub
mit these facts to you, not for the purpose of
criminating otheis who thought it their duty
to vote for the Intel igenrer, hut to show von
that, as a Stale Rights man anti a citizen of
Georgia, I cannot he justly denounced for
preferring the editor of the Globe to Gales &
Seaton, our ancient, consistent, and undevia
ting opponents.
With entire confidence in the rectitude of
my intentions, and the zea! with tvhih 1 have
Discharged the duties vou assigned me, con
scious of having acted on nil occasions, since
l have been in Washington, with an eyceingln
to your interests, I have the honour lo remain,
ns I have been, ymir obedient and faithful
servant, ftDWARD J. BLACK.
CHECKS ON NE W YORK
For sale bv
NORTON & LANGDON.
T une 13. ]? 3 t __
TAX&S.
THE Books of the city ‘fax returns wit! be hand?
e.l over the Treasurer for collection by the Ist.
July next Those who do not make their r- turns by
that time, wl!i be subject to ry 3V a double Tax.
June 13, 17tf C. STRATTON, Clerk.
\XO. 18.