Landmark banner & Cherokee Baptist. (Rome, Ga.) 1859-186?, October 05, 1859, Image 2
BANNER&BAPI’IST.
J. M. WOOD, Editor.
ROME, GA. OCTOBER 5, 1859.
All communications pertaining to the Paper and
Office, should be directed to the “Banner & Bap
tist,” Rome, Ga. ; all private correspondence direct
to J. M. Wood.
Money due the Office, may be sent by mail at our
risk —always mail it in presence of a friend, (other
than the P. HL,) or procure a friend to ntail it for
you —never register.
A word to our Readers.
First of all let us ask your prayers for
the cause of our common Saviour; for
the Landmark Banner and for your un
worthy brother, whose lot it is to edit it.
Will you pray that he may have grace,
wisdom and patience, to work night and
day for you, your children and especially
I for the cause of his Lord and master.
Fathers and mothers in Isreal! To
you we look for counsel sympathy, and
encouragement. Your gray hairs we
honor, your love and forbearance we
crave, your opinions we hope ever
to respect and your heart Theology,
learned by long experience and years of
study, the Bible being your text book,
we long to possess, You are. too near
the spirit land to be influenced by the
temptations of place or position, which
’ is too nearly over to trifle with time and
to be turned aside by worldly influences.
Too near the grave for unholy compro
mises, or to take time to enquire the way
of expediency. You simply wish to know
what is truth, what is right, and then say,
“Little children this is the way, walk ye
in it.” The wave that bears you near
the throne of God and will soon carry you
to our loved Canaan, has borne you safe
ly too long to stop and enquire for the
popular current which has engulfed so
many thousands. Bright garlands await
you, they are almost in sight; will you
pray foriand counsel your brother, tell
ing him what is Bible truth, not what will
Injure or profit him. God bless the old
pilgrims in the way to heaven.
Brethren in the ministry, you have up
on you the vows of ordination and, if
possible, the more sacred vows made up
on your knees in secret, before our com
mon father; yes in that never to be for
gotten hour when you decided the great
question whether it was your duty to
preach the Gospel, you talked with the
Saviour and the Holy Spirit as an hum
ble beging child, and you vowed to your
father that you would preach the'truth,
the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.
You thought not then that many had
itching ears and could not bear the truth,
and that error would kiss you, pay you
poor man. and hug you almost to
to take the sharp edge off your sword and
let it live and sweep the earth as upon a
mission of mercy.
You are the gift ofGod to the churches,
artd arc we prepared, by the grace of God
to say that wcjyill be a blessing to the
t'llil rclif.k,
one to help us lead them in the right
way? We look upon your calling with
sacred awe, and regard it ns the most
solemn and responsible that has ever been
imposed upon a mortal. Those of you
that know us, need not be told that we
love you and your work. Over hill and
dale you go through storm and sushine,
through heat and cold, bearing the glad
tidings of salvation. Holy men of God
work on until the end comes.
Will you pray for us and work for a
paper which you have helped to start ?
You know its object, and what our
Churches want. Brethren and friends all,
this paper, this Baptist paper, is to be a
blessing or a curse to you und your chil
dren. Time is too short with us all to
trifle, especially with God’s word and
things which pertain to the kingdom of
Christ. You honestly believe that the
principles, of the Baptist Church, are
scriptural and that all contradictory prin
ciples are not scriptural and you want us
to say so. You love consistency and
firmness; you love to hear the truth spo
ken in love; you want your children
properly educated—you wish to see the
benevolent resources of Churches devel
oped arid you wish to have a religious
paper whose editorials and articles shall
be full of the spirit of Christ, Then
pray and work for us. All the promise
we shall make is to do the best we ran,
remembering that for all we write God will
bring us into Judgment and that the ter
minus may be wry soon.
For the vein of ine lane holly in this
introdudion to our renders we offer this
apology. The responsibility weighs
heavily upon us ; the future looms up be
fore us und our brethren one at a time
are going off the stage of action, and now
while we write we are entertaining an in
vitation to attend the funeral of a brother
deacon, a most endeared friend who has
passed to his reward, and we are forcibly
reminded of the time when we shall end
eur toils, and when we hope to lay down
our pen at the feet of Jesus.
Who religiously says of this paper?
•Our Beumer;” long may it wave,
O'er tin' land of the tree —the home of the brave." I
The Holy Spirit.
With what sacred awe should we speak ,
and write of thi? Divine Being! With
out Hun what would poor mortals do?—
Before tune began the precious Saviour
covenanted to die for his people, poor lest ;
man! In the fullness of time He came
to our sorrowing world and poured out
his life blood upon Calvary to redeem us
to God! The Father was pleased with
the sacrifice of His Son and smiled upon
His people. And yet without the Holy
Spirit what would poor mortals do!
Dead in tresspasses and in sins until,
by Him made alive.
I'rayerless, ttnpenetenu unbelieving
until led by Him to the Cross. And al!
of us snav sar :
AnJ *.» «- V> st- tjJJ
and all of us have the same answer to
the question,
“Why was I made to hear his voice
And enter while there’s room’ ’
While thousands make a wretched choice
And rather starve than come 1”
W e all need his holy precious influence.
Ministers need to feelas’was said of the Sa
viour bj- the Prophet; “The Spirit of the
Lord God is upon me ; because the Lord
has anointed me to preach good tidings
to the meek ; he hath sent me to bind up
the broken heurted, to proclaim liberty to
the captive and the opening of the prison
to them that are bound.” Brethren we
need the unction of the Holy spirit, yes
we do, and without it our preaching is “as
sounding brass and a tinkling cymbal.”
Praying Christian you need Him to make
“intercessions for you with groanings
which cannot be uttered! Bereaved, mourn
ing, weeping, Christian, you need Him to
soothe your aching heart and cheer your
sad hours. Hungering, thirsting sinner,
you need Him to break to you the bread
of life and to lead you to the fountain of
living waters. Blessed, precious spirit
come and dwell in the heart of thy peo
ple! Almighty friend leave us not to
ourselves to grope in darkness and des
pair as lost children, homeless and friend
less, but guide us, cheer us, sanctify us
and lead us to glory.
!_■. .--l
3
As a matter of taste every one will of
course, have the right to form and express
his opinions. But as a matter of right
we suppose no one will think of raising
the question. Out side of taste we have
some reasons for the selection. There
are certain popular terms which designate
principles. The terms whig and demo
crat, in political circles, are well under
stood. Hard shell, Free will, and Camp
hellite Baptist are as well understood in
religious circles, So is the term Land
markism. We wish our position clearly
and unmistakably known at the very be-
I ginning so that no man may be deceived.
I We are perfectly willing, yea, anxious to
discuss all issues involved in Landmark
ism with our brethren, in love and good
P humor. We say now that our columns
are open to a fair discussion of all de
nominational questions. But discussion
must be conducted with Christian pro
priety and free from offensive personalities.
There is no reason why brethren should
fall out and fight because they disagree,
for a time, upon matters of opinion. You
do not wish us to sit upon a Kail in our
editorial course, for there will be labor
enough to stand fiat-footed, or sit, when
j we have time, in an easy chair. The
“Landmark Banner” then is the name
’ under which we shall work fora common
cause trying to keep in mind our motto
i “His Banner” over us “is love” and the
expression of the Psalmist, “Thou hast
given a Banner to them that fear thee,
that, it may be displayed because of
I Truth." Maj' the great and holj' One
give you such a Banner.
# - ♦
r ” TWf/WX , III lU.V.
t
The great question involved in Land
markism, and the one about which there
has been most feeling and most public
agitation is whether Baptist chrches can.
consistently recognize Ministers of other
denominations, as regular Gospel Minis
ers.
Our readers of course wish to know
our exact position, upon this great ques
tion.
We say that Baptist churches cannot
consistently with their old and cherished
principles affiliate with Ministers of oth
er denominations,as regular Gospel Min
isters. The following is the process by
which we come to this conclusion; God
has given but one revelation to man
This revelation is a unit. Being a unit it
■ teaches the same thing to every man. in
all ages, and will so continue until time I
shall end.
e believe it teaches what is a Gospel ;
church or organization, its ordinances, I
subjets, and government. That its prop
er members must believe on Jesus, to the
saving of the soul—that thej' must be im
mersed upon their declaration of faith,by !
a proper administrator, in the name of |
, the Father, Son and Holj r Ghost. We
I believe that the Sacraments of the church 1
are Immersion and the Lord’s Supper.
, | That the Ministry is the gift of God to
( j the Churches holding membership with j
I ; them, and accountable to them, as well for ■
, I what they teach, us for their Christian de-
| portment.
The Bible being a unit, teaching the
. same thing to all men, cannot be tortured
. | to teach that many diverse organizations 1
. j have equal claim to the apostolic pattern, j
. ■ Hence, ifwe beafterthat pattern,all others
j differing from us are not, if they are not, i
when tried by our platform, then we cannot I
. consistently nor truthfully say so, by re- i
’ cognizing the Ministry of an unscripturai i
organization, ns being regular Ministers
>of the Gospel. This is eol saying that j
we are beyond all question the New Tes
tament Church, but simply that Baptists
I hpncstly believe it, and believing it, we
j shall act upon the belief, until convinced
j to the contrary.
That this is the old notion of Baptists,
will be seen by all who take the pains to
search their history. Whoever heard of
a Baptist church in any age or any coun
try that would receive an applicant, from
any denomination whose principles differ
ed from their own, upon a certificate ot
membership in another organization ? In
variably Baptist churches receive such
upon an experience of grace, and then
immerse them, through the agency of
their own Ministry. If they do not ever
recognize the membership of other or
ganizations. how can they consistently
acknowledge the Ministry ! Besides the
very Ministry publicly recognized by our '
brethren who favor adiiliation, could not <
Cain membership with them, except by '
an experience of grace, and immersion, i
an-l w nil th n gain a fosilLn amont? i
Baptists, as Ministers, by submitting to
re-ordination. The plain truth is, the
Baptist church is after the New Testa
ment pattern, or it is not. If it is, then
all others are not, for certainly the Bap
tist church is verj’ unlike all others. If
it is not, then some one of all others maj r
but not more than one. for the unity
of the Bible forbids plurality. One Spi
rit, one Lord, one Faith and one Baptism.
For our own part, if we were a Methodist
or" Presbyterian, or any other kind of a
church member, we should be a Land
marker. It by no means follows,'that we
are to hate and disrespect others. We
are required to to love all men—even our
enemies. Nor do we interfere with the
freedom of opinion and action of others,
but on the contrary w r ould ’ encourage it.
If all converted persons would agree to
let each other alone upon this question,
and pray, and investigate the bible upon
the subject, we should not be long apart,
as regards the principles involved.—
Business transactions, and social inter
course have nothing to do with the great
church question.
We are willing to publish any well
written article on the other side of the
question, and hope always to respect the
feelings and opinions of those who favor
affiliation.
TIIE SOITHERA BAPTIST SAB
t-a io
This organization was perfected at
Memphis, in November last. The ob
, jects sought are to encourage in every
proper way, the formation of Sabbath
Schools, and to furnish a Southern Bap
tist Literature for our people, especially
for our children and posterity. The
Board of Managers has done much,
verj' much, for the time it has been
at work. The Lord has singularly
blessed the enterprise, and we believe he
will continue to do so.
As this is the first vigorous movement
in the South, to furnish our people with
suitable Sabbath School books, to teach
our children what we as a denomination
honestly believe, it has appeared to us
profoundly strange, that any Baptist in
Georgia, or anj’where else, could find it
in his heart or head to oppose it. But we
predict that the opposition is about
over, and those who were once bold to op
pose will, (if they have not already made
the discovery,) find that the masses of
Georgia Baptists will favor the claims of
the Union, and will use their books.—
And we further predict, that some who
have opposed, and who have regarded
some of the chief workers as excluded Bap
tists, will hereafter be mutn, or will find
out their former mistake, and. fall into the
proper current. That we should depend
upon Pedo-Baptists, or Northern Baptists
to think and write for us, is a burning
shame, and a grievous sin, and when our
people begin to think, and write,and work,
that there should be those amongst us, who
would puff into notice Northern compet
itors, is lamentable in the extreme.
•ftui die Board oT I ii"ii'W4v
us to say, that in our opinion, we have
made one mistake. The people, the Bap
tists of the South, at annual, semi-annual,
and mass meetings of the Union, would
freely' furnish all the means accessary to
carry forward the enterprise, without the
employment of a single agent to collect
funds. We do not say this byway of
blame, to the Board or Agents, nor to jus
tify attacks which have been made upon
them, but because it is our honest and set
tled conviction. Just as soon as present
engagements can be honorably termina
ted, we most respectfully suggest that the
Board employ no more collecting Agents.
Money will come whenever it is needed,
through the voluntary agency of those who
have a heart to work for posterity. Do
not be afraid to trust Him who moves the
hearts of His people.
I Baptist Sc hools in Cherokee, Ga.
. Hearn School at Cave Spring. This
' is the oldest school in this section of the
State. It has an endowment of 812,000
or more which is in the hands of the
' Treasurer of the Georgia Baptist Conven
tion. As a pioneer in Cherokee Ga., this
school has done much for our people and
and is destined yet to do much. Several
ministers have been educated here who
are now working hard for the cause of
i the Saviour.
The Cherokee Baptist College This
Institution is located at Cassville Ga.,
■ and is under the direction of the Chero
kee Georgia Baptist Convention. It is
i admitted that the College building is the
best in the State. For a voung institu
i tion it has a strong faculty, consisting of j
a President and three professors. The
course of instruction is thorough and the j
standard high, shall we say as high as ;
. any in Georgia or the South ? But it i
I needs an endowment and must have it. '
It now has about §2o.(KM>of bond s secur- ■
ed, the interest on ten thousand of which
is to be used for the education of poor
, boj-s and young men. There are also
§IO,OOO more of conditional bonds which
will not be available until §50.000 be rais- I
, ed. This amount, we trust, will be raised i
soon and then we may look for rood results :
to our people.
The Female College at Cedar Town
Ga. This enterprise Commenced in I
1851 as a high school and in the Fall of I
1854 the Baptist of Coosa Association |
took charge of it and procured a Charter
and employed a Faculty and Steward to !
to conduct it as a denominational College. I
This school has done much for the edu
cation of young ladies of the up country..
Many in different parts of this state and
other slates have received their education
at this institution. But the truth to tell i
the responsibility of its management be
came to much distributed, as -too many
cooks spoil the broth” and the conse-;
quence is tbe Institution has been under
a cloud. To arid to this, very much the
fundi d/nnted fur its USB has net bet-u
paid in, while every see that its
successful operations vay much depend
ed upon the which this
was done. The distant ie l° cat i° n
from the Rail Road toijjias made it dis
ficult to unite and our people upon it, —
Yet it may be that a kind Providence will
open the way for futur prosperity. If
the Trustees and friers will rally and
procure the services of an efficient work
ing man as principal there could be no
doubt of success. At any rate they can
have a high school of good order. The
Cherokee Baptist Convention with which
it stands connected passed at its last ses
sion the following resilution:
Resolved ; “That should the Trustees,
of Woodland Female"' C^g e , desire to
make any change in reg»rd to that Insti
tution, the executive committee of the
Convention be empowered to confer with
them upon the to ratify the
same.” ’
Female School at t Marrietta. This
school with chartered privileges is under
the management of Eftl. W. H. Roberts
and is reported as having done well for
the cause of education. In connection
with the school there is published a neat
sheet called the “Kennesaw Gem” in
which appear the compositions of the
young ladies .of the seuool. Whoever,
has been to Marriettaz®tf seen their pret
tv, sjree ts andjjgaujj
their pure xvaterz Slid nbtTceTT the' po
t pulation, is obKgcd to admit that it
is one of the bett if not the very best
, locations for a sclool in the whole State.
See advertisement in another column.
Our Missioiarie Operations.
, The duty injoined «in the great
Commission, “g< ye into all world and
’ preach the gospd to every creature,” the
. necessities of a housand million of pre
, cious souls, thepurposes of God to estab
lish the Saviom’s kingdom in the whole
. earth, the preci>us effects of the gospel,
t when preachel, in saving souls; in
( redeeming the lost; in modifying the
woes of earth, md in securing the joys of
heaven, are considerations quite sufficient
i to impress every one with the greatness
. of the subject aid to inspire every Chris
. tian heart withthe enquiry ; Lord what
wilt thou have ne to do?” .
We honestly believe that all Christians
, appreciate this enquiry and desire to
r know their duty in the premises and the
|- will of their Lird and Master. We say
now, that althcugh, we have been a con
, tributor to misiions for twenty years and
i although we hive been indentified with
missionay Baptists since the memorable
day we joined he church, we never have
, found it in our heart to abuse our anti
[ missionary Brehren. Indeed we have
j looked upon than a little like we do up
, on tha Jews wi'h a kind of sacred awe,
. preserved by oir heavenly Father for a
wise purpose, t balance wheel, in the
, Baptist watch —a necessary member of
the Baptist family. And we believe, that if
the missionary question had not been pres
.j;i---- Uy -u-QA-ifelirii driver indiyql
, uals, Churches and Associations had been
the responsible parties, there never would
have been a rent in in the denomination.
No doubt many Baptists religiously be
, lieved that there was too much human
, machinery in the plans propossed to car
ry out the Great Commision —machinery
-for which they failed to find a scriptural
warrant and which removed the work too
far from the bosom of the church, Say
what we may, Christians will do more for
a known, specified object than they will
for an indefinite one. But it occurs to
us, on the whole, that the missionary
work is in a better condition now than
ever before, Those who are willing to
put their means in a common treasury
to be disposed of, by others, without fur
ther trouble on their part, have ample
opportunity to do so,
Those churches and Associations
whose members prefer to select their own
field and their own men, and to hear di
rectly from them, have the world be
fore them the means in their posses
sion and we trust, the “Commission”
in their hearts, We confess a preference
to the latter plan of operating, and yet
we would not question the right of others
to operate as they choose nor throw an
impediment in the way of the Gospel.—
. For missions we stand pledged during life,
unless convinced of wrong; and our purse,
prayers, soul and body arc at the com
mand of our Lord and Master. Brethren
study the great question “Lord what
wilt thou have me to do?”
Pastoria! Talk.
Con-
I ference Meeting, and did yon take part in all the
| business of God’s house? Or did you allow things
I to pass without voting, and then go off and com-
I plain at the action of the Church' Have you
' tried prayerfully and in good faith to correct all
the wrongs in the Church of which you are a
member, and to promote every good work ' Were
you at the Sabbath School and preaching on Lord’s
day. or did you go on Saturday simply to save
oppearance! While at the Church on Sabbath, if
there, did you pray for your preacher and listen
to his teaching'—or did vou take your scat far off
j from the pulpit and sleep half your time, and the
I other half, w, re you thinking of cotton, merchan- •
: dise. medicine, law. or politics.' Have you any I
I everyday religion! When did you pray in your:
family and talk to vour children? How long has ,
it been since you have talked to a sinner about his 1
condition, and told him of his blessed Jesns?
Do you indeed love your brethren and forgive. I
I from your heart, their trespasses’ How do you l
i stand in your personal relations to Christ? Re
i member, brethren, we are soon to pass away.— '
i An- you even acquainted with the members of |
i your own Church! I; not. seek them out and be
; strangers do longer The good old apostle who
i leaned upon Jesus' bosom, said “Little children.
: love one another."
Pulpit and Ministry S®. 1.
We feel no closer identity with any i
class of men oa earth than the Baptist !
knew how to write a
Jew articles for their benefit we would ,
gladly do so and as we feel great anxiety
for their.usefnlness, happiness and sne
cess in their n.sp?aaibk- work we will
furnish a few thought forthem as we maj'
have time. No other men have such
solemn work to do, such trials, such trou
bles, such persecutions, such sorrows and
after all such joys and such hope. True 1
ministers of the blessed Jesus do more for •
mankind, more for civilazation—for the 1
poor, the broken hearted, than any other '
class of men and ought to be the best *
men in the world. But as they are hu- '
man beings they have faults and imper- 1
sections and as they are called of God to 1
preach. He endows them with peculiar
gift and rare excellences. In writing
about you then brethren, let us save the '
best for the last and speak first of faults
and imperfections.
Envy and Jealousy are by no means
angelic traits as pertaining to men of any
profession, and are not sanctified because
they may attach to Baptist ministers. —
These unlovely traits are developed in a
a disposition to speak evil one of another
and to detract when others would praise
when ministers are under the influence
of envy and and jealousy they are the
Devil’s play things his toools to injure
the cause of Christ, and they ought to
to take their sword (which is the word of
God) and chop off the old serpents claws
and “each esteem other better than him
self.” Mose anon.
fatJEL'Jjord’a l>eacqn%f
used to say that “the Lord had Deacons, and so
had the Devil.”
Though this brother is to earth no more, “he
yet speaketh.” The Lord’s deacons are humble,
devoted, God-fearing men, who pray in their fam
ilies, help their pastors, look after the poor, and
in this way strengthen their churches. The De
vil's deacons are worldly minded, care not a great
deal about pastors, except to get clear of
those who are faithful and act generally so as to
be great curses to the Churches. The Lord de
liver his people from such deacons.
Mercer University.
It has been thought by some that the Baptists
of the up-country feel no interest for this our
. “Nursing Mother.” We say for ourself, that oth
er ties cannot losoen the hold which our “Alma
Mater” has upon our affections and memory.—
1 Indeed we feel towards it as the Jew feels towards
Jerusalem, the city of his fathers, yet like the
Jew, who Wanders to other lands, will help to
build Synagogues for himself, his children and
his brethren. So we must be allowed to work for
the cause of education in the best possible way.—
' There is room for all our schools and as many
more, and all must stand or fall upon their own
merit, and none must expect us to puff or praise
, beyond our convictions of propriety. It is the
great aggregate to which all liberal minded men
look, and such will rejoice that our people are ed
ucated, whether it be done in a warm, mild or
■ cold climate.
Encouraging Incidents.
We had the pleasure of attending the Noonday
. Association, held in Marietta, including the 3d
Sabbath in September. The brother who had
been appointed to preach the Missionary Sermon
on Sabbath, not being present, and his alternate
declining to pleach, the lot fell on Jonah! This
1 same Jonah, alter presenting the general claims ]
F of Missions, towards the close of his talk, said
. that the Cherokee Indian Mission was very dear
to his heart, and that, should the good Lord spare
■wiiu im, i., iwiimu iu nt H mwl< lt .
hilly established. While the brethren were tak
king up a collection, a young lady, not having
• any money with her. took a pure gold ring from
• her finger and put it in the hat.
i After the Congregation was dismissed a widow
. sister, who was then an entire stranger to us.
, came up and said that she had sympathy for the
mission mentioned above, and placed a purse in
our hand which she wished appropriated to it.—
' The purse contained twenty-four and a half dol
lars in gold. This incident is worth the more be
cause the donor did not wish her name known!—
[ God bless our sisters in Christ Jesus! But that
( purse, brethren,-—what shall we say of it? Our
Lord and Master intends much good to come of
it. We have a good notion to call it the Ladies’
1 Cherokee Indian Mission Burse, and let our sis
-1 ters make up enough to pay a year's expenses to
some good brother who will go to the red man of
the West and proclaim the unsearchable riches of
Christ. Already the amount has been increased
at home by our better half and little daughter six
years old. who says she will give one of her
dollars to the little Indians. While speaking of
the praying woman in Jesus, we had as well say
■ a little more now, (for it is bound to come.) The
turning point in our decision to edit the Banner,
was on learning that about the first one who sug
gested the name was a praying sister in the up
country. The first advance payment was by a
young lady at Fort Valley, Ga., and we heard three
weeks ago, that a lady in Alabama, whom we !
baptised a few years ago, had obtained thirty sub
scribers and that she said she didn’t intend to
stop until she got a hundred. Some of these
things may appear trifling, but to us they arc of
priceless value.
May the great Jehovah grant us the use of
brother Mallary’s Battle-axe that we may worth
ily fill the place assigned us.
Brethren not taking the Paper.
We have a considerable number of
friends in Georgia, who have not sent in
their names as subscribers. Some of
these differ with us, no doubt, upon some
questions great and small, but we know
not how brethren are toget together with
out a free and brotherly interchange of
thought, and it might be of service to any
one to read on both sides of all questions.
I Besides, if anj' of our brethren know that
j they are right, and that we are wrong, j
thej' might be doing a good work-by show- i
ing it by scripture, and logic, and “convert !
us from the error of our ways.” Be as
i sured that any article scripturally and lo
: gically written, shall have a place in the
“Banner,” for we have profound respect
; for both. 1
There is one brother especially, that we 1 1
i wot of, who works in the Potato Creek [ 1
i country, bj' the name of K , from whom I'
; we hoped to obtain a long list,, who has I 1
| not yet come up to our expectations— , ’
Now, this brother is a great transgressor, 1
andasthisisadayofexposures, if he stands
off, we shall hunt up his transgressions. *
As we must be allowed to do things in :
l our own way, we have some thought of !
j publishing transgression No. l,this week, ’
! but as we do not wish our sanctimonious j ■
readers to see it, we shall give direction 1
to have it put off in a comer, on the third ’
page.
Remember the Sabbath day to keep it (
holy, . • (
[For the Banner & Baptist.]
Church Independence.
Circumstances have led lately to much
discussion of what some brethren call the
sovereignty of the churches, I will say, at
the outset, that I think the term, sovereign
is utterly misplaced when applied to a
church, which by all consent is subject
in all things. We may as well say that
a justices court is sovereign. Jesus Christ
is the only king, the only sovereign.—
But under Jesus Christ, I not only admit,
but maintain the independency of the ,
churches; and I presume, this is all that
brethren generally mean when they speak
of church sovereignty.
Dr. Dawson in an article on “Editorial
Troubles” in the South Western Baptist
has defined his position with great clear
ness and force. Dr. Mallary has in the
same paper, sanctioned the views of Dr.
D. These views are not speculative and
theoretical, but are of immediate, practical
bearing. We can not put them aside.—
We are compelled to consider them ; we
are compelled to take position. As the
question is forced upon us, Bro. IJd-.
itor, let us look at it as beconjj&g'men and
refers to the Nashville
.4ffiicult} r as the “single question which
is now likely to produce destraction.”
Brethren, all over the country, have look
»ng of
evil to that difficult)'.
Bro. Dawson with a firm but not un
gentle hand has raised the curtain and
showed us what is to come.
I will repeat the “facts” as Dr. D. has
stated them. The first Baptist church in
Nashville has passed sentence of exclu
sion against certain members. Notwith
standing this, “some excellent brethren”
consider these members “not excluded
(i. e. not rightfully excluded) and there
fore that they are, both ministers and
private members, to all the priv
ileges of regular church members.” —
he says: “On the other hand
there is a large number” “who think dif
ferently” and adds “of course these breth
ren can never recognize the excluded
until they are rightfully restored, without
the abandonment of a cherished organic
principles." But he goes futher. The
non-fellowship extends not only to Graves,
Dayton, and their company, but to all
who have fellowship for them. He says,
“Zs must come to this, that those identify
ing themselves with the excluded, can no
more be recognized by the other, than
the excluded themselves. This is the ten
dency, and the result." [Mj'
italics.]
This then is Dr. Dawson’s position,
endorsed by Dr. Mallary.
Let us now look at the practical work
ing of the matter. At the Columbus Con
vention, a brother volunteered to go as
correspondent to the General Association
of Middle Tennessee and North Alabama.
Objection was made ; but the difficulty
which threatened the integrity of the Con
vention was avoided by the prevalence of
it up i rit »r ti ii 1 1 ii t ii.ui ; HO- principle
was abandoned or compromised on either
side. Correspondents however were ap
pointed to the Baptist Convention of
Cherokee Georgia. Some of them attend
ed and were received. Dr. Dayton and
at least one other of the [so called] ex
cluded members of the Nashville Church
were also received, and their membership
in the Spring Street Church was specially
recognized. Here then is a body which
represents the fourteen thousand Baptists
of Cherokee Georgia “identifying them
selves with the excluded.” The same
principle which would refuse correspon
dence with the Tennessee Association
will also cut off all correspondence with
the Cherokee Convention ; and Bro.
Dawson’s dictum, endorsed by Bro Mal
lary, forbids any recognition of the mem
bers of that body. I will barely refer to one
other fact. At the Cuthbert meeting,
Bro. Lot Warren presided, and J. R.
Graves was present, and was not merely re
cognized, but welcomed with a special
welcome. Lot Warren then has identi
fied himself with J. R. Graves; and he
and Bro. Mallary are both members of
the Albany church. Willi brother Mal
lary, attempt to enforce the dictum which
he has endorsed ? Or will he practical
ly ignore it ?
These facts show that the question
meets us at our own door, and that wc can
avoid and ignore it no longer.
As “the only remedy” for the evils
which threaten us, Dr. Dawson proposes
“a return to first prinples." I agree to the
proposition. What then do the first and
great principles of Church independence
require? Do they require all other
churches to recognize, respect, and sub
mit to the decission of the Nachville
Church in excluding these members,
whether that decisions is right or wrong?
With due deference to brethren Dawson
and Mallary, 1 think differently. Stripped
of all its personalties the question is
simply this, can one particular, local,
visible church bj' its act bind all other
particular, local,visable churches? If so,
we are bound by the decision of the
Nashvill Church; otherwise we are not.
A church is not bound to receive a
member into its fellowship, because an
other church has so received him. Usu
ally indeed one church receives a mem
ber on a letter certifying his fellowship
in another church, but this is matter of
courtesy and not of right; the church is
not bound to receive him, and I have
known a church to reject such an appli
cant.
Neither is a church bound to receive
as a minister one whom another church
so receives. It decides for itself whether ; 1
it will so receive him or not, and I have
known more than one instance where
churches have refused to receive such.
Again, a church is not bound to reject
a member who has been rejected bj' an
other church. If a man applies to one
church for mcmberAip Bn experience.
and is rejected because his experience
does not satisfy them, he may neverthe
less be received bj' another upon the very
same experience. Nobody will deny this.
Upon the very same principle, one who
has been excluded by one church may be
received by another. The instances just
given show that neither in receiving nor
rejecting members can one local church
bind any other local church.
It has been argued that a majority must
govern, and that its decision cannot be
called in question. But in the cases
♦above refered to, there might be unanim
ity in receiving or rejecting a member in
one church, and still another church
would not be bound by its action. Even
unanimity in error or wrong should not be
respected. It certainly is no new doc
trine among Baptists, that a minority how
ever small, which adheres to the gospel,
is to be respected rather than a majority
which holds to error and violates the laws
of Christ.
If it is admitted that a wrong decision
of one church is not binding on all others
the whole case is yielded, for each church
must then decidrTof~~itself whether the
decision is right or wrong. It is courtesy
to respect the decision of a sister church,
but courtesy should never ovrrrule right.
It the decision of the Nashville church is
vindicated on the. ground of right, it is
easy io show that it is entitled to no re
spect whatever. _
Holding these opinions, I am not pre- "
pared to go with Brethren D. and M. in
declaring nonfellowship with those who
identify themselves with Bip, Graves and
Dayton. lam happy to know that these
opinions have been acted upon in other
cases without producing any harm. In
deed how can the principles of the’gospel
produce harm ? Eight or nine years ago
several members were excluded by Dr.
Cone’s chureh in N. Y. City. They
were almost immediately received by an
other church in the same city. A little
irritation was produced, but the great bo
dy of Baptists moved on, undisturbed by
the difficulty. Act upon the same prin
ciples in regard to the Nashville difficulty
and it will be shut up within the city of
the Rock and die out through mere star
vation. It lives now by aliment drawn
from abroad.
A great deal has been said about the
action of the Concord Association in de
ciding a matter touching the independence
of the churches. If Associationsjexist at
all, they must have power of deciding
who are its own menbers. This is an in
alienable right of every representative
body, when two societies present them
selves claiming membership under the
same title, the Association is compelled
to decide. If there is any thing wrong in
this, it is a wrong that exists in the very
nature of Associations, and can be got rid
of only bj' abolishing them altogether. And
Bro, Dawson would seem to be veering
round to this point. The right in ques
tion was exercised by the Georgia Asso
ciation in 1822 when the minority of the
Williams’ Creek church was received as
the true churchfnul the majority declared
to be no church, but a disorderly faction.
(See Mercee’s History Georgia Baptist
Association page 80 81.) I can not help
thinking that much, if not at all, of the
clamor about the Concord Association
violating church independence is owing
to the fact that their decision is adverse to
the opinions and wishes of those who
consider Graves & Co., excluded mem
bers. The bull has gored their ox.
I am confirmed in this opinion by wit
nessing the manner in which brethren re
ceive the action of the Southern Baptist
Convention. There is current a very com
mon saying that the Si B. C. intended to
ignore the Nashville difficulty. Yet, in
every way in which it was possible for
that Convention to recognize the existence
of that difficulty, they did recognize it;
and recognize it to sustain Howell and
discountenance Graves. Dr. Howell was
elected President for the very pur
pose of sustaining him. That election
and his subsequent election as President
of the Bible Board did recognize his ecle
siastical position. He claims it as a tri
umph; and so do his friend and Graves’
enemies. On the other hand, every thing
was done that could be done to show that
Graves was considered an excluded mem
ber. Why was he not appointed to
preach ? Was it not because of the Nash
ville difficulty? Now while the oppo
nents of Graves and friends of Howell
claim the action of the S. B. C. as con
demning the former and sustaining the
latter. I submit that the Convention did
within its sphere just what the Associa
tion did within its sphere. If the Con
stitution of the Convention had made
membership in a Baptist church a qualifi
cation of membership in the Convention,
the members would have been compelled
to decide whether G. was an excluded
man or not. If therefore a decision of
this kind is a violation of church inde
pendence, we must bid farewell to all our
Associations and Conventions, and recog
nize no other organization than the New
Testament church. We may perhaps be
compelled to consider this question.
In these remarks I have discussed prin
ciples, not personalities. I have alluded
only to facts which are well known and in
disputable. I have discussed a question
which is brought to our very doors, not
as a speculative but as a practical ques
tion—a question which we must meet
and decide each for himself.
The conclusion to which principles
leads me, I am willing to stand by. That
conclusion is that I cannot declare non
fellowship with the brethren of the
Cherokee Convention, or the Cuthbert
mass meeting, or any others who have
identified themselves with Graves and
Dayton. If for this lamto be nonfellow
shipedby Brethren Dawson and Mallary,
I shall bear in sorrow the loss of their fel
lowship ; but I shall bear it,
INDEPENDENT.