Watson's weekly Jeffersonian. (Atlanta, Ga.) 1907-1907, July 04, 1907, Image 1
xTSON’S WEEK/ y
1N JEFFERSONIAN I
EDITED BY
THOS/ E* WATSON
Vol. 11.
The Nelv York World Asks—" What is a Democrat?"
. is* IKS3
M »■ ? O\
■■ j=U
■£* /a vs
Jtw»>M|P ,: ‘ l I \\ Tnos. Jefferson S JA—»—•x> jjy f
OißiH=fefr ~ ~
iW’ 1
I.' 1 . W?iiffliffilalMl« I WI- l | M flli
Dear Reader: The World’s question has been a thorn in my side for a long time, and I could stand it no longer. I just had to draw! I started off
bravely to answer the conundrum, but got so twisted and tangled up I had to quit. The question troubles me greatly and I now call for help! ! ! Can
you assist me?—Gordon Nye.
“WHAT IS A DEMOCRAT?”—
Mr. Bryan, in a response to our in
vitation of June. 6, undertakes in
another- column to answer The
World’s question, 4 ‘What is a Demo
crat?’’
In respect to the external aspects
of the inquiry he defines a Democrat
as “one who considers himself a
member of the Democratic organiza
tion, who works with the Democratic
organization and who expects to vote
the Democratic ticket.”
In a broader and more philosophi
cal sense a Democrat is one “who
believes in the rule of the people
and who desires to make the Gov-
' • •*
Atlanta, Ga., Thursday July 4, 1907.
eminent the instrument in the hands
of the people to carry out their
will.”
Under this definition as to prin
ciple, wherein is Mr. Roosevelt less
of a Democrat than Mr. Bryan?
Wherein is Secretary Taft less of a
Democrat than Senator Danid?
Wherein is Governor Hughes less of
a Democrat than Mayor McClellan
or Mr. Hearst? Wherein is almost
any Republican less of a Democrat
than almost any Democrat?
Mr. ißryan’s dissertation on the
distinction between the Hamiltonian
and Jeffersonian theories of govern
ment must be dismissed as not ger
mane to the issue. There is no party
' , ' J' »' ‘ ■, 'U js i-
* ! * ** * > -.TUEi'' ■
at the present time which professes
to distrust the people and none
which can be said to identify itself
in a peculiar way with the people.
The people are the parties and the
parties are the people.
As for the popular election of
United States Senators which Mr.
Bryan presents as an important
Democratic doctrine, it involves
chiefly a question of expediency
rather than of fudamental principle.
As for the initiative and referendum,
we observe that Mr. Bryan does n t
claim that it has yet attained* full
stature as a Democratic measure.
There is not a line, not a word, not
a syllable about Government own
ership of railroads. Mr. Bryan d; es
not mention it as an article of Dem-
ocratic faith.
The World is glad to throw open
its columns to Mr. Bryan’s letter,
but we are bound to confess that we
do not find his answer either clear,
complete or conclusive. No st an
ger to American politics could deter
mine from it the essential differences
between a Democrat and a Republi
can in the year 1907, and an answe
that does not define those differences
is not an answer tdP The World’s
question.
After reading Mr. Bryan’s letter
with the utmost care and prostrating
assurances of distinguished consid
eration to its eminent author, The
World feels bound to renew its in-
*
quiry “What is a Democrat?”—N,
Y. World.
No. 24.